2016 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Last updated

This is a list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in the year 2016. 65 cases were decided and these are ordered by neutral citation.

Contents

In 2016 Lord Neuberger was the President of the Supreme Court, Lady Hale was the Deputy President.

The table lists judgments made by the court and the opinions of the judges in each case. Judges are treated as having concurred in another's judgment when they either formally attach themselves to the judgment of another or speak only to acknowledge their concurrence with one or more judges. Any judgment which reaches a conclusion which differs from the majority on one or more major points of the appeal has been treated as dissent.

All dates are for 2016 unless expressly stated otherwise.

Table key


Delivered a judgment (majority)

Concurred in the judgment of another justice (majority)

Delivered a judgment (dissenting)

Concurred in the judgment of another justice (dissent)

Did not participate in the decision

2016 judgments

Case nameCitationArguedDecided Neuberger Hale Mance Kerr Clarke Wilson Sumption Reed Carnwath Hughes Toulson Hodge
Mirga v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 19-10 March 201527 January
R (on the application of C) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] UKSC 226 October 201527 January
Youssef v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2016] UKSC 318-19 November 201527 January
Re B (A Child) [2016] UKSC 48-9 December 20153 February
R v Taylor [1] [2016] UKSC 515 December 20153 February
Kennedy v Cordia (Services) LLP [2016] UKSC 619 October 201510 February
Shop Direct Group v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 79-10 December 201517 February
R v Jogee [2] [2016] UKSC 827-29 October 201518 February
Knauer v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 928 January24 February
Cox v Ministry of Justice [3] [2016] UKSC 1012-13 October 20152 March
Mr A M Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc [3] [2016] UKSC 1112-13 October 20152 March
PMS International Group Plc v Magmatic Ltd [2016] UKSC 123 November 20159 March
DB Group Services Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 133 December 20159 March
Lynn Shellfish Ltd v Loose [2016] UKSC 149-10 February13 April
In the matter of N (Children) [2016] UKSC 1517 March13 April
R (on the application of Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 1623-24 November 201520 April
Asset Land Investment Plc v The Financial Conduct Authority [2016] UKSC 1713-14 January20 April
The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd [2016] UKSC 1821 January20 April
R (on the application of O) (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 1919-20 January27 April
NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NV v Cargill International SA [2016] UKSC 201 December 201511 May
Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 2125 February11 May
In the matter of an application by JR55 for Judicial Review [2016] UKSC 228 March11 May
PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC v O W Bunker Malta Ltd [2016] UKSC 2322-3 March11 May
Eclipse Film Partners No 35 LLP v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 2413 April11 May
Ministry of Defence v Iraqi Civilians [2016] UKSC 2525 April12 May
PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 2621 April19 May
McBride v Scottish Police Authority [2016] UKSC 273 March15 June
McDonald v McDonald [2016] UKSC 2815-16 March15 June
BNY Mellon Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v LBG Capital No. 1 Plc [2016] UKSC 2921 March16 June
Brown and another, the Joint Administrators of Loanwell Ltd. v Stonegale Ltd. [2016] UKSC 3015 February22 June
Taiwo v Olaigbe [2016] UKSC 3120-21 April22 June
MP (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 3211 May22 June
MS (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 3312 May22 June
In the matter of D (A child) [2016] UKSC 3423 May22 June
R (on the application of Bancoult (No 2)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2016] UKSC 3522 June 201529 June
Goluchowski v District Court in Elblag, Poland [2016] UKSC 3614 March29 June
R (on the application of Ismail) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 3726-7 January6 July
Campbell v Gordon [2016] UKSC 3812 April6 July
R (on the application of The Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [1] [2016] UKSC 3918 April13 July
Edwards v Kumarasamy [2016] UKSC 405 May13 July
Amoena (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 417 June13 July
Patel v Mirza [4] [2016] UKSC 4216-7 February20 July
Willers v Joyce and another (in substitution for and in their capacity as executors of Albert Gubay (deceased)) (1) [4] [2016] UKSC 437 March20 July
Willers v Joyce and another (in substitution for and in their capacity as executors of Albert Gubay (deceased)) (2) [4] [2016] UKSC 447 March20 July
Versloot Dredging BV and another v HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG [2016] UKSC 4516-7 March20 July
Lee-Hirons v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] UKSC 4626 April27 July
Bailey v Angove's PTY Ltd [2016] UKSC 478 June27 July
Hayward v Zurich Insurance Company plc [2016] UKSC 4816 June27 July
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Franco Vomero (Italy) [2016] UKSC 4921 June27 July
Hastings Borough Council v Manolete Partners Plc [2016] UKSC 5023 June27 July
The Christian Institute v The Lord Advocate [2016] UKSC 518-9 March28 July
Moreno v The Motor Insurers' Bureau [2016] UKSC 5212-13 July3 August 2016
MB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 535 July10 August
R (on the application of Ingenious Media Holdings plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs) [2016] UKSC 544 July19 October
R v Mitchell [2016] UKSC 557 July19 October
R (on the application of Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 5625-6 July19 October
Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd (formerly known as Chartis Insurance (UK) Ltd [2016] UKSC 5730 June26 October
R (on the application of Rutherford and another) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [1] [5] [2016] UKSC 5829 February - 2 March9 November
Makhlouf v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland) [1] [2] [2016] UKSC 5912-14 January16 November
Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1] [2] [2016] UKSC 6012-14 January16 November
R v Golds [1] [2] [2016] UKSC 6114 June30 November
R v Docherty [2016] UKSC 623-4 May14 December
R (on the application of Mirza) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 6319 October14 December
Habib Khan v General Pharmaceutical Council [2016] UKSC 6410 November14 December
R v Guraj [6] [2016] UKSC 6517 November14 December

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 An augmented panel of 7 judges sat in this case.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Lord Thomas, the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, also sat on this case. He supported the majority judgment.
  3. 1 2 Lord Dyson, the Master of the Rolls, also sat on this case and agreed with the majority.
  4. 1 2 3 An augmented panel of 9 judges sat in this case.
  5. Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissented as regards the case brought by A.
  6. The Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland, Sir Declan Morgan, also sat on this case. He agreed with the majority.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">J. Harvie Wilkinson III</span> American judge (born 1944)

James Harvie Wilkinson III is an American jurist who serves as a United States circuit judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. His name has been raised at several junctures in the past as a possible nominee to the United States Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court is the highest court in Israel. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all other courts, and in some cases original jurisdiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the United Kingdom</span> Final court of appeal in the United Kingdom

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom is the final court of appeal in the United Kingdom for all civil cases, and for criminal cases originating in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. As the United Kingdom’s highest appellate court for these matters, it hears cases of the greatest public or constitutional importance affecting the whole population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Danny Julian Boggs</span> American judge

Danny Julian Boggs is an American attorney and a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. He was appointed to the court in 1986 and served as its Chief judge from September 2003 to August 2009. Boggs was on the short list of President George W. Bush's candidates for the U.S. Supreme Court.

Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. The case reached the high court after U.S. Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, appealed a ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in favor of LeRoy Carhart that struck down the Act. Also before the Supreme Court was the consolidated appeal of Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, whose ruling had the same effect as that of the Eighth Circuit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Procedures of the Supreme Court of Canada</span>

The procedures of the Supreme Court of Canada for hearing cases is established in the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Supreme Court Act, and by tradition.

The Georgia Court of Appeals is the intermediate-level appellate court for the U.S. state of Georgia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir</span> President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Robert John Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir, is a British judge who has been President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom since January 2020. He was the principal judge in the Commercial Court in Scotland before being promoted to the Inner House of the Court of Session in 2008. He is an authority on human rights law in Scotland and elsewhere; he served as one of the UK's ad hoc judges at the European Court of Human Rights. He was also a Non-Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong.

James L. Dennis is an American lawyer, jurist, and former politician serving as a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, with chambers in New Orleans, Louisiana.

This is a complete list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom between the court's opening on 1 October 2009 and the end of that year. Most of the cases were heard in the House of Lords before judgments were given in the new Supreme Court. The court heard 17 cases during this time; they are listed in order of each case's Neutral citation number.

This is a list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in 2010 and statistics associated thereupon. Since the Supreme Court began its work on 1 October 2009, this year was its first full year of operation. In total, 58 cases were heard in 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom</span> The judges of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Justices of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom are the judges of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom other than the president and the deputy president. The Supreme Court is the highest court of the United Kingdom for civil and criminal matters in the jurisdictions of England and Wales and Northern Ireland. Judges are appointed by the King on the advice of the Prime Minister, who receives recommendations from a selection commission.

This is a list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in the year 2011. They are ordered by Neutral citation.

<i>Jones v Kaney</i> 2011 UK Supreme Court judgment

Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13 is a 2011 decision of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on whether expert witnesses retained by a party in litigation can be sued for professional negligence in England and Wales, or whether they have the benefit of immunity from suit. The case involved a psychologist (Kaney) instructed as an expert witness in a personal injury claim, who was said to have negligently signed a statement of matters agreed with the expert instructed by the opposing side, in which she made a number of concessions that weakened the claim considerably. As a result, according to the injured claimant (Jones), he had to settle the claim for much less than he would have obtained had his expert not been careless. To succeed in the claim, he had to overturn an earlier Court of Appeal decision that had decided that preparation of a joint statement with the other side's expert was covered by immunity from suit. Kaney therefore succeeded in getting the claim struck out before trial on an application heard by Mr Justice Blake in the High Court of Justice. The judge issued a certificate allowing the claimant to "leapfrog" the Court of Appeal and go straight to the Supreme Court to appeal against his decision.

This is a list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in the year 2014. They are ordered by neutral citation.

This is a list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in the year 2015 as of 8 August. So far 57 cases have been decided and these are ordered by neutral citation.

This is a list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in the year 2012. They are ordered by Neutral citation.

This is a list of the 81 judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in the year 2013. They are ordered by neutral citation.

This is a list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in the year 2017. 5 cases have been decided as of 25 January 2017 and these are ordered by neutral citation.

June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo, 591 U.S. 1101 (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a Louisiana state law placing hospital-admission requirements on abortion clinics doctors was unconstitutional. The law mirrored a Texas state law that the Court found unconstitutional in 2016 in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (WWH).