4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitor

Last updated

4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) inhibitors (HPPD inhibitors) are a class of herbicides that prevent growth in plants by blocking 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase, an enzyme in plants that breaks down the amino acid tyrosine into molecules that are then used by plants to create other molecules that plants need. This process of breakdown, or catabolism, and making new molecules from the results, or biosynthesis, is something all living things do. HPPD inhibitors were first brought to market in 1980, although their mechanism of action was not understood until the late 1990s. They were originally used primarily in Japan in rice production, but since the late 1990s have been used in Europe and North America for corn, soybeans, and cereals, and since the 2000s have become more important as weeds have become resistant to glyphosate and other herbicides. Genetically modified crops are under development that include resistance to HPPD inhibitors. [1] There is a pharmaceutical drug on the market, nitisinone, that was originally under development as an herbicide as a member of this class, and is used to treat an orphan disease, type I tyrosinemia.

Contents

HPPD inhibitors can be classified into three fundamental chemical frameworks: pyrazolones, triketones, and diketonitriles. The triketone class is based on a chemical that certain plants make in self-defense called leptospermone; the class was developed by scientists at companies that eventually became part of Syngenta. Bayer CropScience has also been active in developing new HPPD inhibitors.

Mechanism of action

The mechanism of action for HPPD inhibitors was misunderstood for the first twenty years that these products were sold, starting in 1980. [2] They were originally thought to be inhibitors of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (protox). [3]

4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) is an enzyme found in both plants and animals which catalyzes the catabolism of the amino acid tyrosine. [4] Preventing the breakdown of tyrosine has three negative consequences: the excess of tyrosine stunts growth; the plant suffers oxidative damage due to lack of tocopherols (vitamin E); and chlorophyll is destroyed due to lack of carotenoids that protect it. [2] Plants turn white without deformation due to a complete loss of chlorophyll, which has led compounds of this class to be classified as "bleaching herbicides", as are protox inhibitors. [2] [5] [6]

More specifically, inhibition of HPPD prevents the formation of a breakdown product, homogentisic acid, which in turn is a key precursor for the biosynthesis of both tocopherols and plastoquinone. Plastoquinone is in turn a critical co-factor in the formation of carotenoids, which protect chlorophyll in plants from being destroyed by sunlight. [4]

This class of herbicides represents one of the last discoveries of a new herbicide mode of action in the wave of discovery that ended in late 1990s. [3] [7]

Resistance in weeds

As of 2011 very little resistance was known: In 2010 Waterhemp ( Amaranthus tuberculatus ) in two different locations - Iowa and Illinois - developed resistance. [8] [9]

Products and economics

As of 2009, HPPD inhibitors had three fundamental chemical frameworks: [2] [10]

Agricultural use

Pyrazolate, pyrazoxyfen and benzofenap were first commercialized in the Japanese rice market starting in 1980, but became less important when sulfonylurea herbicides were introduced. In 1990 sulcotrione was introduced for post- emergence weed control in corn. Isoxaflutole opened the market more broadly for HPPD inhibitors when it was introduced in 1996 for corn and sugarcane, and for use as a pre-emergence herbicide that could control broadleaf weeds as did sulcotrione, but also additional grass weeds. Benzobicyclon, was introduced in 2001 for control of broadleaf weeds and some sedges that are problems in rice, that had become resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides. Mesotrione was introduced in 2002 and like sulcotrione is a triketone, so it is effective on the same weeds and crops, but is more potent, making it more useful in mixes with other herbicides - an important factor for fully controlling weeds and preventing the development of resistance. It has become the biggest selling member of the HPPD class. [2]

Topramezone was introduced in 2006 for corn and soy, and is the most potent HPPD inhibitor, but has serious carry-over issues especially for soybean in US, where the minimum time from application to planting is 18 months. Tembotrione was introduced in 2007 for corn, and works against key grass species and importantly, kills broadleaf weeds, including glyphosate-, ALS- and dicamba-resistant weeds. Used with safeners there are no crop-rotation restrictions. Pyrasulfotole was also introduced in 2007 for cereals in North America, and was the first new class of herbicide in cereals in many years, and an important advance against weeds that had become resistant to existing herbicides. It remains active in the soil during the growing season and when used with safeners, it does not damage crops and there are no crop-rotation restrictions. [2]

Herbicide risks and toxicities

Tembotrione has low acute toxicity via the oral, dermal and inhalation routes of exposure (Toxicity category III or IV). It is a dermal sensitizer but not an eye or dermal irritant [11] : 3 

Genetically modified crops

To deal with rising resistance to existing herbicides, Bayer CropScience has been developing various genetically modified crops resistant to HPPD inhibitors: in one version, the crops are resistant to both HPPD inhibitors and glyphosate, and in collaboration with Syngenta, crops that are resistant to HPPD inhibitors and glufosinate. [12] [13]

The collaboration to develop the stacked HPPD inhibitor/glyphosate resistant products was first announced in 2007. [14]

Medical use

In Type I tyrosinemia, a different enzyme involved in the breakdown of tyrosine, fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase is mutated and does not work, leading to very harmful products building up in the body. [15] Fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase acts on tyrosine after HPPD does, so scientists working on making these inhibitors hypothesized that inhibiting HPPD and controlling tyrosine in the diet could treat this disease. A series of small clinical trials were attempted with one of their compounds, nitisinone and were successful, leading to nitisinone being brought to market as an orphan drug. [16] [17] [18]

History of the discovery of the triketone class of HPPD inhibitors

The origin of the triketone family of HPPD inhibitors had its beginnings in the curiosity of a biologist about allelopathic weed control of weeds in the back yard of his house. This curiosity led to the discovery and development of the triketone class of herbicides. [19] Investigation of the mode of action of this class of compounds led to the discovery that it could be used to treat patients with tyrosinaemia type 1, a treatment which has been said to "transform the natural history of tyrosinaemia". [20]

All of the herbicidal and pharmaceutical triketone HPPD inhibitors including mesotrione (Callisto)(I), [21] sulcotrione (Mikado)(II) [22] and nitisinone (Orfadin)(III) [23] had their common origin in the observation in 1977 by Reed Gray, a biologist at Stauffer Chemical's Western Research Center (WRC) in California, that few weeds emerged under bottlebrush plants ( Callistemon citrinus ) in the back yard of his house.

I Mesotrione.svg
I
II Chemical structure of sulcotrione.png
II
III Nitisinone structure.png
III

To investigate this effect, he took soil from underneath these plants and extracted and fractionated it. The resulting extracts were applied to soil flats containing watergrass ( Echinochloa crus-galli ) as an indicator species at the very high application rate of 100 pounds per acre (112 kg/ha). There was a herbicidal effect from this test, so the extracts were developed on a preparative thin layer chromatographic sheet. The same Echinochloa crus-galli seeds were placed on this sheet and germinated. The active ingredient was identified by bleaching symptoms on the test species.

The area where the herbicidal activity was seen was extracted and he submitted the isolated active ingredient to Ken Cheng at the Western Research Center who, using proton NMR, IR and mass spectrometry identified the structure as being that of Leptospermone (IV) which was a known natural product [24] that had been derived from the steam-volatile oils of some Australian plants, but which had never been cited as having any biological activity.

IV Leptospermone.svg
IV

He approached a chemist, Ron Rusay, at the Western Research Center who independently synthesized the compound and submitted it for further greenhouse testing. These tests showed that it had modest herbicidal activity against grass weeds at a very high application rate of 100 pounds per acre (112 kg/ha). He prepared a series of analogs in which the alkanoyl group was modified and a patent was obtained on this series of compounds. [25] These compounds had similar, weak herbicidal activity similar to that found with the lead compound. Because of the weak herbicidal activity, work on other analogs was not pursued.

Shortly after this, another WRC chemist, Bill Michaely, synthesized an aroyl triketone (V) as an unexpected byproduct when attempting to synthesize a sethoxydim (VI) [26] analog.

V HPPD aroyltriketone.png
V
VI Sethoxydim chemical structure.png
VI

While this compound did not have any herbicidal activity, it did show activity in a screen designed to show antidotal activity toward other herbicides. When attempting to optimize the antidote activity, several aryl substituted analogs were prepared. What was discovered was that those compounds with an ortho substituent had herbicidal activity but no antidote activity. This observation coupled with the knowledge of the herbicidal activity of the earlier leptospermone analogs was pivotal in formulating an idea of a potential toxophore for this class of herbicides.

A small task force consisting of David Lee, Bill Michaely and Don James prepared a number of substituted triketones with chloro-, bromo- and methyl-substituents in the ortho position. Biological activity remained modest and the task force was disbanded after a short while.

One working hypothesis was that the active ingredient in these triketones was the cyclized tetrahydroxanthenones(VII). Bill Michaely prepared several of these, but the herbicidal activity remained modest and all work in the area was terminated. It was not until David Lee was able to show that these compounds were in equilibrium with the 2-hydroxy triketones(VIII) by trapping the intermediate with methyl iodide that the reason for the biological activity was understood.

VII Tetrahydroxanthenone chemical structure.png
VII
VIII HPPD 2-hydroxytriketone.png
VIII

David Lee had a strong background in quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR) after a post-doctoral year with Professors Manfred Wolff and Peter Kollman where he used the Prophet system. [27] Looking over the QSAR (quantitative structure–activity relationships) of the triketones, David Lee saw a potential discrepancy in the existing structure-activity analysis. Other than the 2-chloro-4-nitro substitution pattern, no other triketones with electron-withdrawing substituents in the 4-position had ever been prepared. He hypothesized that the activity of the triketones could be correlated to the electron withdrawing ability of the substituents. The activity of the 2-chloro-4-nitro analog was an outlier, and it was theorized that perhaps the nitro group was being reduced in vivo. The 4-methylsulfonyl group was then prepared to test this hypothesis, and what was to become the commercial herbicide Mikado (II) was prepared. The prospect of improving the biological activity with new aromatic substitution patterns totally rejuvenated work on the triketones.

A key discovery in the preparation of these compounds was the finding by Jim Heather in the WRC Process Development group that acetone cyanohydrin was a good catalyst for the preparation of the o-chloro analogs. [28] Use of this catalyst allowed for the first time production of the o-nitro triketones.

At this point a very large effort on the synthesis of analogs was commenced with David Lee coordinating the effort. Key chemists participating in this were Charles Carter, Bill Michaely, Hsiao-ling Chin, Nhan Nguyen and Chris Knudsen, although at one time almost every synthesis chemist at the WRC worked on this project. [29] [30] [31] Within a relatively short time, major progress was made in optimizing certain substitution combinations. SC-0051 (sulcotrione) was synthesized and tested in Sept. – Oct. 1983, and SC-1296 (mesotrione) and SC-0735 (nitisinone) were both synthesized and tested in early 1984. Triketones were in widespread university field trials in 1985. [32] The first of the triketone patents was published in 1986. [33]

With a long history of working with bleaching herbicides which inhibit phytoene desaturase [34] including the commercial herbicide flurochloridone(IX), [35] there was some considerable interest to find that these compounds do not inhibit phytoene desaturase in vitro. The fact that phytoene desaturase inhibitors typically have a high log P, whereas the triketones do not, further suggested a different mode of action.

IX Fluorochloridone chemical structure.png
IX

There had been some early toxicological concern about corneal and paw lesions which were observed with rats that had repeatedly dosed with a triketone. Several chemists and toxicologists came upon a paper [36] describing very similar ocular, but not skin, lesions with inhibitors of tyrosine hydroxylase. Linda Mutter in the WRC Toxicology Section used a spot test for tyrosine on the urine of treated rats and had positive results. Plasma tyrosine analysis further confirmed the buildup of tyrosine in treated rats. [37]

Work on the mode of action and toxicology of the triketones took on a broader range of interactions when Stauffer Chemical was purchased by ICI in June 1987. ICI then split off the pharmaceutical and agrochemical businesses as Zeneca and then Syngenta was formed in 2000 by the merger of Novartis Agribusiness and Zeneca Agrochemicals.

As part of toxicology studies, Martin Ellis at the ICI Central Toxicology Laboratory identified triketone inhibition of tyrosine catabolism in rat liver and also found that tyrosine hydroxylase was not inhibited by the triketones. [38] He furthermore found that the urine of rats treated with III showed elevated levels of both p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate and p-hydoxyphenyllactic acids. These results suggested that p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) was the enzyme that was inhibited, a fact which was confirmed by S. Lindstedt. [39] Further tests established that HPPD was the enzyme inhibited in plants as well as mammals. [37]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herbicide</span> Type of chemical used to kill unwanted plants

Herbicides, also commonly known as weed killers, are substances used to control undesired plants, also known as weeds. Selective herbicides control specific weed species while leaving the desired crop relatively unharmed, while non-selective herbicides kill plants indiscriminately. The combined effects of herbicides, nitrogen fertilizer, and improved cultivars has increased yields of major crops by 3x to 6x from 1900 to 2000.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MCPA</span> Organic compound used as an herbicide

MCPA is a widely used phenoxy herbicide introduced in 1945. It selectively controls broad-leaf weeds in pasture and cereal crops. The mode of action of MCPA is as an auxin, which are growth hormones that naturally exist in plants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phenoxy herbicide</span> Class of herbicide

Phenoxy herbicides are two families of chemicals that have been developed as commercially important herbicides, widely used in agriculture. They share the part structure of phenoxyacetic acid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glufosinate</span> Broad-spectrum herbicide

Glufosinate is a naturally occurring broad-spectrum herbicide produced by several species of Streptomyces soil bacteria. Glufosinate is a non-selective, contact herbicide, with some systemic action. Plants may also metabolize bialaphos and phosalacine, other naturally occurring herbicides, directly into glufosinate. The compound irreversibly inhibits glutamine synthetase, an enzyme necessary for the production of glutamine and for ammonia detoxification, giving it antibacterial, antifungal and herbicidal properties. Application of glufosinate to plants leads to reduced glutamine and elevated ammonia levels in tissues, halting photosynthesis and resulting in plant death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase</span> Fe(II)-containing non-heme oxygenase

4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD), also known as α-ketoisocaproate dioxygenase, is an Fe(II)-containing non-heme oxygenase that catalyzes the second reaction in the catabolism of tyrosine - the conversion of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate into homogentisate. HPPD also catalyzes the conversion of phenylpyruvate to 2-hydroxyphenylacetate and the conversion of α-ketoisocaproate to β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate. HPPD is an enzyme that is found in nearly all aerobic forms of life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nitisinone</span> Chemical compound

Nitisinone, sold under the brand name Orfadin among others, is a medication used to slow the effects of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 (HT-1).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Propanil</span> Chemical compound

Propanil is a widely used contact herbicide. With an estimated use of about 8 million pounds in 2001, it is one of the more widely used herbicides in the United States. Propanil is said to be in use in approximately 400,000 acres of rice production each year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Saflufenacil</span> Chemical compound

Saflufenacil is the ISO common name for an organic compound of the pyrimidinedione chemical class used as an herbicide. It acts by inhibiting the enzyme protoporphyrinogen oxidase to control broadleaf weeds in crops including soybeans and corn.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leptospermone</span> Chemical compound

Leptospermone is a chemical compound produced by some members of the myrtle family (Myrtaceae), such as Callistemon citrinus, a shrub native to Australia, and Leptospermum scoparium (Manuka), a New Zealand tree from which it gets its name. Modification of this allelopathic chemical to produce mesotrione led to the commercialization of derivative compounds as HPPD inhibitor herbicides.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mesotrione</span> Chemical compound used as an herbicide

Mesotrione is a selective herbicide used mainly in maize crops. It is a synthetic compound inspired by the natural substance leptospermone found in the bottlebrush tree Callistemon citrinus. It inhibits the enzyme 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) and is sold under brand names including Callisto and Tenacity. It was first marketed by Syngenta in 2001.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acifluorfen</span> Chemical compound

Acifluorfen is the ISO common name for an organic compound used as an herbicide. It acts by inhibiting the enzyme protoporphyrinogen oxidase which is necessary for chlorophyll synthesis. Soybeans naturally have a high tolerance to acifluorfen and its salts, via metabolic disposal by glutathione S-transferase. It is effective against broadleaf weeds and grasses and is used agriculturally on fields growing soybeans, peanuts, peas, and rice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bifenox</span> Chemical compound

Bifenox is the ISO common name for an organic compound used as an herbicide. It acts by inhibiting the enzyme protoporphyrinogen oxidase which is necessary for chlorophyll synthesis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tyrosinemia type I</span> Medical condition

Tyrosinemia type I is a genetic disorder that disrupts the metabolism of the amino acid tyrosine, resulting in damage primarily to the liver along with the kidneys and peripheral nerves. The inability of cells to process tyrosine can lead to chronic liver damage ending in liver failure, as well as renal disease and rickets. Symptoms such as poor growth and enlarged liver are associated with the clinical presentation of the disease. If not detected via newborn screening and management not begun before symptoms appear, clinical manifestation of disease occurs typically within the first two years of life. The severity of the disease is correlated with the timing of onset of symptoms, earlier being more severe. If diagnosed through newborn screening prior to clinical manifestation, and well managed with diet and medication, normal growth and development is possible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fomesafen</span> PPOi herbicide

Fomesafen is the ISO common name for an organic compound used as an herbicide. It acts by inhibiting the enzyme protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) which is necessary for chlorophyll synthesis. Soybeans naturally have a high tolerance to fomesafen, via metabolic disposal by glutathione S-transferase. As a result, soy is the most common crop treated with fomesafen, followed by other beans and a few other crop types. It is not safe for maize/corn or other Poaceae.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fluazifop</span> ACCase herbicide, fop, anti-grass

Fluazifop is the common name used by the ISO for an organic compound that is used as a selective herbicide. The active ingredient is the 2R enantiomer at its chiral centre and this material is known as fluazifop-P when used in that form. More commonly, it is sold as its butyl ester, fluazifop-P butyl with the brand name Fusilade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indaziflam</span> Preemergent herbicide discovered in 2009

Indaziflam is a preemergent herbicide especially for grass control in tree and bush crops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Butafenacil</span> Chemical compound

Butafenacil is the ISO common name for an organic compound of the pyrimidinedione chemical class used as an herbicide. It acts by inhibiting the enzyme protoporphyrinogen oxidase to control broadleaf and some grass weeds in crops including cereals and canola.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aclonifen</span> Chemical compound

Aclonifen is a diphenyl ether herbicide which has been used in agriculture since the 1980s. Its mode of action has been uncertain, with evidence suggesting it might interfere with carotenoid biosynthesis or inhibit the enzyme protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO). Both mechanisms could result in the observed whole-plant effect of bleaching and the compound includes chemical features that are known to result in PPO effects, as seen with acifluorfen, for example. In 2020, further research revealed that aclonifen has a different and novel mode of action, targeting solanesyl diphosphate synthase which would also cause bleaching.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribenuron</span> Chemical compound

Tribenuron in the form of tribenuron-methyl is a sulfonylurea herbicide. Its mode of action is the inhibition of acetolactate synthase, group 2 of the Herbicide Resistance Action Committee's classification scheme.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chlorsulfuron</span> ALS inhibitor herbicide

Chlorsulfuron is an ALS inhibitor herbicide, and is a sulfonylurea compound. It was discovered by George Levitt in February 1976 while working at DuPont, which was the patent assignee.

References

  1. ↑ "HPPD herbicide-tolerant soybeans: new type of GMO". Farm Progress . 2014-10-08. Retrieved 2021-03-15.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 van Almsick, Andreas (2009). "New HPPD-Inhibitors - A Proven Mode of Action as a New Hope to Solve Current Weed Problems". Outlooks on Pest Management. 20 (1): 27–30. doi:10.1564/20feb09.
  3. 1 2 Cole, D.; Pallett, K.E.; Rodgers, M. (2000). "Discovering new Modes of Action for herbicides and the impact of genomics". Pesticide Outlook. 12 (6): 223–9. doi:10.1039/B009272J.
  4. 1 2 Moran, GR (Jan 2005). "4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase" (PDF). Arch Biochem Biophys. 433 (1): 117–28. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2004.08.015. PMID   15581571.
  5. ↑ "Inhibition of Pigment Synthesis (Bleaching Herbicides)" (PDF). LSUAgCenter.com. Retrieved 8 September 2017.
  6. ↑ Wolfgang Kramer and Ulrich Schirmer, Modern Crop Protection Compounds (1)197-276(2012)
  7. ↑ Duke, S.O. (Apr 2012). "Why there are no new herbicide modes of action in recent years". Pest Management Science. 68 (4): 505–12. doi:10.1002/ps.2333. PMID   22190296.
  8. ↑ Hausman, Nicholas E; Singh, Sukhvinder; Tranel, Patrick J; Riechers, Dean E; Kaundun, Shiv S; Polge, Nicholas D; Thomas, David A; Hager, Aaron G (2011-01-26). "Resistance to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides in a population of waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) from Illinois, United States". Pest Management Science . 67 (3). Society of Chemical Industry (Wiley): 258–261. doi:10.1002/ps.2100. ISSN   1526-498X. PMID   21308951. S2CID   31756104.
  9. ↑ Syngenta (2011). "Know the Facts about HPPD Weed Resistance" (PDF).
  10. ↑ George W. Ware and David M. Whitacre. An Introduction to Herbicides (2ndEdition) Archived 2014-05-05 at the Wayback Machine Extracted from The Pesticide Book, 6th ed*. (2004), Published by MeisterPro Information Resources, A division of Meister Media Worldwide, Willoughby, Ohio
  11. ↑ US EPA Pesticide Fact Sheet: Tembotrione
  12. ↑ Gil Gullickson for Crops.com December 5, 2012 Something old, something new with herbicides
  13. ↑ Rhonda Brooks for Farm Journal February 12, 2014. "Seed Companies Pick Up the Pace on Seed Trait-Herbicide Systems"
  14. ↑ Bayer CropScience press release. November 26, 2007 Bayer CropScience, Mertec and M.S. Technologies to Co-Develop New Soybean Trait Products
  15. ↑ National Organization for Rare Disorders. Physician's Guide to Tyrosinemia Type 1 Archived 2014-02-11 at the Wayback Machine
  16. ↑ Lock, EA; et al. (Aug 1998). "the discovery of the mode of action of 2-(2-nitro-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione (NTBC), its toxicology and development as a drug". J Inherit Metab Dis. 21 (5): 498–506. doi:10.1023/A:1005458703363. PMID   9728330. S2CID   6717818.
  17. ↑ "Nitisinone (Oral Route) Description and Brand Names - Mayo Clinic".
  18. ↑ Sobi Orfadin (nitisinone) Archived 2014-05-04 at the Wayback Machine
  19. ↑ Beaudegnies, R; et al. (Jun 2009). "Herbicidal 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors--a review of the triketone chemistry story from a Syngenta perspective". Bioorg Med Chem. 17 (12): 4134–52. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2009.03.015. PMID   19349184.
  20. ↑ McKieman, P.J. (2006). "Nitisinone in the treatment of hereditary tyrosinaemia type 1". Drugs. 66 (6): 743–50. doi:10.2165/00003495-200666060-00002. PMID   16706549. S2CID   24239547.
  21. ↑ MeisterPro Crop Protection Handbook 2011, p.502
  22. ↑ MeisterPro Crop Protection Handbook 2011, p. 632
  23. ↑ Christopher G. Knudsen, David L. Lee, William J. Michaely, Hsiao-ling Chin, Nhan H. Nguyen, Ronald J. Rusay, Thomas H. Cromartie, Reed Gray, Byron H. Lake, Torquil E. M. Frasier and David Cartwright , Discovery of the triketone class of HPPD inhibiting herbicides and their relationship to naturally occurring -triketones, Allelopathy in Ecological Agriculture and Forestry (2000), p.101-111
  24. ↑ Hellyer, R.O. (1968). "The occurrence of β-triketones in the steam-volatile oils of myrtaceous Australian plants". Aust. J. Chem. 21 (11): 2825–2828. doi:10.1071/CH9682825.
  25. ↑ Reed A. Gray, Chien K. Tseng, Ronald J. Rusay, 1-Hydroxy-2-(alkylketo)-4,4,6,6-tetramethyl cyclohexen-3,5-diones, US4,202,840(1980)
  26. ↑ MeisterPro Crop Protection Handbook 2011, p. 618
  27. ↑ Lee, D.L., Kollman, P.A., Marsh, F.J., Wolff, M.E., Quantitative relationships between steroid structure and binding to putative progesterone receptors, J. Med. Chem. , 20 (1977) pp. 1139-46
  28. ↑ James B. Heather, Pamela D. Milano, Process for the production of acylated 1,3- dicarbonyl compounds, US 4,695,673 (1987)
  29. ↑ (8) David L. Lee, Michael P. Prisbylla, Thomas H. Cromartie, Derek P. Dagarin, Stott W. Howard, W. Mclean Provan, Martin K. Ellis, Torquil Fraser, Linda C. Mutter. The Discovery and Structural Requirements of Inhibitors of p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate Dioxygenase. Weed Science,45(5),p.601-609
  30. ↑ (9) David L. Lee, Christopher G. Knudsen, William J. Michaely, John B Tarr, Hsiao-Ling Chin, Nhan H. Nguyen, Charles g. Carter, Thomas H. Cromartie, Byron H. Lake, John M. Shribbs, Stott Howard, Sean Hauser, D. Dgarin, The Synthesis nd Structure-Activity Relationships of the Triketone HPPD Herbicides, Insect, Weed and Fungal Control, ACS Symposium Series No. 774 2000), p. 8-19
  31. ↑ Lee, David L., Knudsen, Christopher G.,Michaely, William J., Chin, Hsiao-Ling, Nguyen, Nhan H., Carter, Charles G., Cromartie, Thomas G., Lake, Byron H., Shribbs, John M., Frasier, Torquil E.M.,The Structure-Activity Relationships of the Triketone Class of HPPD Herbicides, Pesticide Science 54:377-384 (1998)
  32. ↑ (10) Evans, J.O. and Gunnell, R.W. (1986) Evaluation of SC-0774, SC-0051 and SC-5676 in field corn. Research.progress.report. Western Society of Weed Science(USA),130-131
  33. ↑ Michaely, W.J., Kratz, G.W., Certain 2-(2-substituted benzoyl)-1,3- cyclohexanediones and their use as herbicides, US 4,780,127 (1988)
  34. ↑ Sandman, Gerhard, Schmidt, Arno, Linden, Harmut, Böger, Peter, (1991) Phytoene Desaturase, the Essential Target for Bleaching Herbicides, Weed Science, 39:474-479
  35. ↑ MeisterPro Crop Protection Handbook 2011, p. 428
  36. ↑ Kolzumi, S., Nagatsu, T., Iinuma, H., Ohno, M., Takeuchi,T. and Umezawa,H. (1982). Inhibition of phenylalanine hydroxylase, a pterin-requiring monooxygenase, by ouudenone and its derivatives, Journal of Antibiotics 35: 458.
  37. 1 2 (14) M.P. Prisbylla, B.C. Onisko ,J.M. Shribbs, D.O. Adams, Y. Liu, M.K. Ellis, T.R Hawkes, L.C. Mutter, The Novel Mechanism of Action of the Herbicidal Triketones, Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Weeds (1993.) 731-8
  38. ↑ Ellis, M.K., A.C. Whitfield, L.A. Gowans, T.R. Auton, W.M. Provan, E.A. Lock and L.L. Smith 1995, Inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase by 2-(2-nitro-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)-cyclohexane-1,3-dione and 2-(2-chloro-4-methylsulfonylbenzoyl)-cyclohexane-1,3-dione. Toxicol. Appl Pharmacol. 133:12-19
  39. ↑ Lindsted, W. and B. Odelhög , 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase from human liver (1987) Methods Enzymol. 142;139-142
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.