American Revolutionary War

Last updated

American Revolutionary War
Clockwise: Surrender of Lord Cornwallis after the Siege of Yorktown, Battle of Trenton, The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker Hill, Battle of Long Island, Battle of Guilford Court House
DateApril 19, 1775  September 3, 1783
(8 years, 4 months and 15 days)
Ratification effective: May 12, 1784
(9 years and 23 days)
Eastern North America, Caribbean Sea, Indian subcontinent, Africa, the Atlantic Ocean, and the Indian Ocean

American-Allied victory:

  • Peace of Paris
  • British recognition of American independence
  • End of the First British Empire [1]
  • British retention of Canada and Gibraltar

Flag of the United States (1776-1777).svg Thirteen Colonies
(before 1776)
Flag of the United States (1777-1795).svg United States
(after 1776)
Flag of the Vermont Republic.svg Vermont Republic [2]
Royal Standard of the King of France.svg French Empire [3] [4]
Bandera de Espana 1748-1785.svg Spanish Empire [5]



Statenvlag.svg Dutch Republic [6]
Flag of Mysore.svg Mysore [7]

Union flag 1606 (Kings Colors).svg British Empire
Flag of Hanover (1692).svg Hanover [9] [10]

German mercenaries:
Wappen-HK (1736-1804).svg Hesse-Kassel
Wappen-HK (1736-1804).svg Hesse-Hanau
Coat of Arms of the Principality of Waldeck and Pyrmont.svg Waldeck
Coat of Arms of Brunswick-Luneburg.svg Brunswick
Wappen Brandenburg-Ansbach.svg Ansbach
Blason Principaute d'Anhalt-Zerbst (XVIIIe siecle).svg Anhalt-Zerbst

Commanders and leaders

Flag of the United States (1777-1795).svg George Washington
Flag of the Vermont Republic.svg Thomas Chittenden
Royal Standard of the King of France.svg Louis XVI
Bandera de Espana 1748-1785.svg Charles III

Statenvlag.svg William V
Flag of Mysore.svg Hyder Ali
Flag of Mysore.svg Tipu Sultan

full list...

Union flag 1606 (Kings Colors).svg Flag of Hanover (1692).svg George III
Union flag 1606 (Kings Colors).svg Lord North
Union flag 1606 (Kings Colors).svg Lord George Germain

full list...

United States:
Army & Militia:
40,000 (average) [12]
200,000 (total served) [13]
5,000 sailors (peak 1779) [14]
53 frigates and sloops (total served) [14]
State Navies:
106 ships (total served) [15]
55,000 sailors (total served) [16]
1,697 ships [17]

63,000 French and Spanish (Gibraltar) [18] [19]
146 ships-of-the-line (1782) [20]

American Indian Allies:


Great Britain:
48,000 (America peak) [21]
121,000 (global 1781) [22]
7,500 (Gibraltar) [23]
94 ships-of-the-line (1782) [20]
104 frigates (1781) [24]
37 sloops (1781) [25]
171,000 sailors [26]

25,000 (total served) [27]

2,365 (total served) [28]

German mercenaries:
29,875 (total served) [29]

American Indian Allies:

13,000 [30]
Casualties and losses

United States:
25,000–70,000 total dead [12] [31]
6,800 killed in battle
17,000 died of disease [32]

at least 7,000 dead
(2,112 in the United States) [33]
19 ships of the line (1,346 guns) lost [34]
30 frigates (988 guns) lost [34]

5,000 dead [35]
(124 in the American south) [36]
8 ships of the line (572 guns) lost [34]
11 frigates (326 guns) lost [34]

500 killed [35]

Total: 37,000–82,500+ soldiers dead

Great Britain:
43,633 total dead [37]
~9,372 killed in battle [38]
27,000 died of disease [12] [39]
1,243 killed in battle
18,500 died of disease (1776–1780) [40]
42,000 deserted [41]
20 ships of the line (1,396 guns) lost [34]
70 frigates (1,978 guns) lost [34]
2,200 merchant ships (600 to American privateers) lost [34]
75 privateering ships lost [34]

7,774 total dead
1,800 killed in battle
4,888 deserted [12]

7,000 total dead
1,700 killed in battle
5,300 died of disease (estimated) [42]

Total: 78,200+ soldiers dead

The American Revolutionary War (17751783), also known as the American War of Independence, [43] was an 18th-century war between Great Britain and its Thirteen Colonies (allied with France) which declared independence as the United States of America. [N 1]

Thirteen Colonies British American colonies which became the United States

The Thirteen Colonies, also known as the Thirteen British Colonies or the Thirteen American Colonies, were a group of colonies of Great Britain on the Atlantic coast of North America founded in the 17th and 18th centuries which declared independence in 1776 and formed the United States of America. The Thirteen Colonies had very similar political, constitutional, and legal systems and were dominated by Protestant English-speakers. They were part of Britain's possessions in the New World, which also included colonies in Canada, Florida, and the Caribbean.

After 1765, growing constitutional and political differences strained the relationship between Great Britain and its colonies. Patriot protests against taxation without representation followed the Stamp Act and escalated into boycotts, which culminated in 1773 with the Sons of Liberty destroying a shipment of tea in Boston Harbor. Britain responded by closing Boston Harbor and passing a series of punitive measures against Massachusetts Bay Colony. Massachusetts colonists responded with the Suffolk Resolves, and they established a shadow government which wrested control of the countryside from the Crown. Twelve colonies formed a Continental Congress to coordinate their resistance, establishing committees and conventions that effectively seized power. [44]

Patriot (American Revolution) American colonist who rejected British rule in the American Revolution

Patriots were those colonists of the Thirteen Colonies who rejected British rule during the American Revolution and declared the United States of America as an independent nation in July 1776. Their decision was based on the political philosophy of republicanism as expressed by spokesmen such as Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Thomas Paine. They were opposed by the Loyalists who supported continued British rule.

No taxation without representation Slogan of the American Revolution

"No taxation without representation" is a slogan originating during the 1700s that summarized one of 27 colonial grievances of the American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies, which was one of the major causes of the American Revolution. In short, many in those colonies believed that, as they were not directly represented in the distant British Parliament, any laws it passed affecting the colonists were illegal under the Bill of Rights 1689, and were a denial of their rights as Englishmen.

Stamp Act 1765 United Kingdom legislation

The Stamp Act of 1765 was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain which imposed a direct tax on the British colonies in America and required that many printed materials in the colonies be produced on stamped paper produced in London, carrying an embossed revenue stamp. Printed materials included legal documents, magazines, playing cards, newspapers, and many other types of paper used throughout the colonies, and it had to be paid in British currency, not in colonial paper money.

British attempts to disarm the Massachusetts militia in Concord led to open combat and a British defeat on April 19, 1775. Militia forces then besieged Boston, forcing a British evacuation in March 1776, and Congress appointed George Washington to command the Continental Army. Concurrently, the Americans failed decisively in an attempt to invade Quebec and raise insurrection against the British. On July 2, 1776, the Second Continental Congress voted for independence, issuing its declaration on July 4. Sir William Howe launched a British counter-offensive, capturing New York City and leaving American morale at a low ebb. However, victories at Trenton and Princeton restored American confidence. In 1777, the British launched an invasion from Quebec under John Burgoyne, intending to isolate the New England Colonies. Instead of assisting this effort, Howe took his army on a separate campaign against Philadelphia, and Burgoyne was decisively defeated at Saratoga in October 1777.

Concord, Massachusetts Town in Massachusetts, United States

Concord is a town in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, in the United States. At the 2010 census, the town population was 17,668. The United States Census Bureau considers Concord part of Greater Boston. The town center is near where the confluence of the Sudbury and Assabet rivers forms the Concord River.

Battles of Lexington and Concord first military engagements of the American Revolutionary War

The Battles of Lexington and Concord were the first military engagements of the American Revolutionary War. The battles were fought on April 19, 1775 in Middlesex County, Province of Massachusetts Bay, within the towns of Lexington, Concord, Lincoln, Menotomy, and Cambridge. They marked the outbreak of armed conflict between the Kingdom of Great Britain and its thirteen colonies in America.

Siege of Boston the Continental Armys siege of British-held Boston during the beginning of the American Revolutionary War

The Siege of Boston was the opening phase of the American Revolutionary War. New England militiamen prevented the movement by land of the British Army, which was garrisoned in what was then the peninsular city of Boston, Massachusetts Bay. Both sides had to deal with resource supply and personnel issues over the course of the siege. British resupply and reinforcement activities were limited to sea access. After eleven months of the siege, the British abandoned Boston by sailing to Nova Scotia.

Burgoyne's defeat had drastic consequences. France formally allied with the Americans and entered the war in 1778, and Spain joined the war the following year as an ally of France but not as an ally of the United States. In 1780, the Kingdom of Mysore attacked the British in India, and tensions between Great Britain and the Netherlands erupted into open war. In North America, the British mounted a "Southern strategy" led by Charles Cornwallis which hinged upon a Loyalist uprising, but too few came forward. Cornwallis suffered reversals at King's Mountain and Cowpens. He retreated to Yorktown, Virginia, intending an evacuation, but a decisive French naval victory deprived him of an escape. A Franco-American army led by the Comte de Rochambeau and Washington then besieged Cornwallis' army and, with no sign of relief, he surrendered in October 1781.

Treaty of Alliance (1778) 1778 defense pact between France and the United States

The Treaty of Alliance with France or Franco-American Treaty was a defensive alliance between France and the United States of America, formed in the midst of the American Revolutionary War, which promised mutual military support in case fighting should break out between French and British forces, as the result of signing the previously concluded Treaty of Amity and Commerce. The alliance was planned to endure indefinitely into the future. Delegates of King Louis XVI of France and the Second Continental Congress, who represented the United States at this time, signed the two treaties along with a separate and secret clause dealing with future Spanish involvement, at the hôtel de Coislin in Paris on February 6, 1778. The Franco-American alliance would technically remain in effect until the 1800 Treaty of Mortefontaine, despite being annulled by the United States Congress in 1793 when George Washington gave his Neutrality Proclamation speech saying that America would stay neutral in the French Revolution.

Pacte de Famille series of 3 alliances (1773, 1743, 1761) between the Bourbon kings of France and Spain

The Pacte de Famille is one of three separate, but similar alliances between the Bourbon kings of France and Spain.

Kingdom of Mysore historic state in India

The Kingdom of Mysore was a kingdom in southern India, traditionally believed to have been founded in 1399 in the vicinity of the modern city of Mysore. The kingdom, which was ruled by the Wodeyar family, initially served as a vassal state of the Vijayanagara Empire. With the decline of the Vijayanagara Empire, the kingdom became independent. The 17th century saw a steady expansion of its territory and during the rule of Narasaraja Wodeyar I and Chikka Devaraja Wodeyar, the kingdom annexed large expanses of what is now southern Karnataka and parts of Tamil Nadu to become a powerful state in the southern Deccan.

Whigs in Britain had long opposed the pro-war Tories in Parliament, and the surrender gave them the upper hand. In early 1782, Parliament voted to end all offensive operations in America, but the war continued overseas. Britain remained under siege in Gibraltar but scored a major victory over the French navy. On September 3, 1783, the belligerent parties signed the Treaty of Paris in which Great Britain agreed to recognize the sovereignty of the United States and formally end the war. French involvement had proven decisive, [45] but France made few gains and incurred crippling debts. Spain made some territorial gains but failed in its primary aim of recovering Gibraltar. [46] The Dutch were defeated on all counts and were compelled to cede territory to Great Britain. In India, the war against Mysore and its allies concluded in 1784 without any territorial changes.

The Whigs were a political faction and then a political party in the parliaments of England, Scotland, Great Britain, Ireland and the United Kingdom. Between the 1680s and 1850s, they contested power with their rivals, the Tories. The Whigs' origin lay in constitutional monarchism and opposition to absolute monarchy. The Whigs played a central role in the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and were the standing enemies of the Stuart kings and pretenders, who were Roman Catholic. The Whigs took full control of the government in 1715 and remained totally dominant until King George III, coming to the throne in 1760, allowed Tories back in. The Whig Supremacy (1715–1760) was enabled by the Hanoverian succession of George I in 1714 and the failed Jacobite rising of 1715 by Tory rebels. The Whigs thoroughly purged the Tories from all major positions in government, the army, the Church of England, the legal profession and local offices. The Party's hold on power was so strong and durable, historians call the period from roughly 1714 to 1783 the age of the Whig Oligarchy. The first great leader of the Whigs was Robert Walpole, who maintained control of the government through the period 1721–1742 and whose protégé Henry Pelham led from 1743 to 1754.

Great Siege of Gibraltar 18th-century siege

The Great Siege of Gibraltar was an unsuccessful attempt by Spain and France to capture Gibraltar from the British during the American War of Independence.

Battle of the Saintes

The Battle of the Saintes, or Battle of Dominica, was an important naval battle in the Caribbean between the British and the French that took place 9 April 1782 – 12 April 1782, during the American Revolutionary War. The British fleet under Admiral Sir George Rodney defeated a French fleet under the Comte de Grasse, forcing the French and Spanish to abandon a planned invasion of Jamaica.


Taxation disputes

Parliament passed the Stamp Act in 1765 to pay for British military troops stationed in the American colonies after the French and Indian War. Parliament had previously passed legislation to regulate trade, but the Stamp Act introduced a new principle of a direct internal tax. Americans began to question the extent of the British Parliament's power in America, and the colonial legislatures argued that they had exclusive right to impose taxes within their jurisdictions. [47] Colonists condemned the tax because their rights as Englishmen protected them from being taxed by a Parliament in which they had no elected representatives. [48] Parliament argued that the colonies were "represented virtually", an idea that was criticized throughout the Empire. [49] Parliament did repeal the act in 1766, but it also affirmed its right to pass laws that were binding on the colonies. [50] From 1767, Parliament began passing legislation to raise revenue for the salaries of civil officials, ensuring their loyalty while inadvertently increasing resentment among the colonists, and opposition soon became widespread. [51] [52]

French and Indian War North American theater of the worldwide Seven Years War

The French and Indian War (1754–1763) pitted the colonies of British America against those of New France, each side supported by military units from the parent country and by American Indian allies. At the start of the war, the French colonies had a population of roughly 60,000 settlers, compared with 2 million in the British colonies. The outnumbered French particularly depended on the Indians.

The rights of Englishmen are the perceived traditional rights of English subjects and later English speaking subjects of the British crown. In the 18th century, some of the colonists who objected to British rule in the British colonies in North America argued that their traditional rights as Englishmen were being violated. The colonists wanted and expected the rights that they had previously enjoyed in England: a local, representative government, with regards to judicial matters and particularly with regards to taxation. Belief in these rights subsequently became a widely-accepted justification for the American Revolution.

Virtual representation Concept that UK parliamentarians spoke on behalf of all imperial subjects

Virtual representation refers to the idea that the members of Parliament, including the Lords and the Crown-in-Parliament, reserved the right to speak for the interests of all British subjects, rather than for the interests of only the district that elected them or for the regions in which they held peerages and spiritual sway. Virtual representation was the British response to the First Continental Congress in the American colonies. The Second Continental Congress asked for representation in Parliament in the Suffolk Resolves, also known as the first Olive Branch Petition. Parliament claimed that their members had the well being of the colonists in mind. The Colonies rejected this premise.

This iconic 1846 lithograph by Nathaniel Currier was entitled "The Destruction of Tea at Boston Harbor"; the phrase "Boston Tea Party" had not yet become standard. Contrary to Currier's depiction, few of the men dumping the tea were actually disguised as Indians. Boston Tea Party Currier colored.jpg
This iconic 1846 lithograph by Nathaniel Currier was entitled "The Destruction of Tea at Boston Harbor"; the phrase "Boston Tea Party" had not yet become standard. Contrary to Currier's depiction, few of the men dumping the tea were actually disguised as Indians.

Enforcing the acts proved difficult. The seizure of the sloop Liberty in 1768 on suspicions of smuggling triggered a riot. In response, British troops occupied Boston, and Parliament threatened to extradite colonists to face trial in England. [54] Tensions rose after the murder of Christopher Seider by a customs official in 1770 and escalated into outrage after British troops fired on civilians in the Boston Massacre. [55] In 1772, colonists in Rhode Island boarded and burned a customs schooner. Parliament then repealed all taxes except the one on tea, passing the Tea Act in 1773, attempting to force colonists to buy East India Company tea on which the Townshend duties were paid, thus implicitly agreeing to Parliamentary supremacy. The landing of the tea was resisted in all colonies, but the governor of Massachusetts permitted British tea ships to remain in Boston Harbor, so the Sons of Liberty destroyed the tea chests in what became known as the "Boston Tea Party". [56]

Parliament then passed punitive legislation. It closed Boston Harbor until the tea was paid for and revoked the Massachusetts Charter, taking upon themselves the right to directly appoint the Massachusetts Governor's Council. Additionally, the royal governor was granted powers to undermine local democracy. [57] [58] Further measures allowed the extradition of officials for trial elsewhere in the Empire, if the governor felt that a fair trial could not be secured locally. The act's vague reimbursement policy for travel expenses left few with the ability to testify, and colonists argued that it would allow officials to harass them with impunity. [59] Further laws allowed the governor to billet troops in private property without permission. [60] The colonists referred to the measures as the "Intolerable Acts", and they argued that their constitutional rights and their natural rights were being violated, viewing the acts as a threat to all of America. [61] The acts were widely opposed, driving neutral parties into support of the Patriots and curtailing Loyalist sentiment. [62] [63]

Colonial response

The colonists responded by establishing the Massachusetts Provincial Congress, effectively removing Crown control of the colony outside Boston. Meanwhile, representatives from twelve colonies [64] [65] convened the First Continental Congress to respond to the crisis. The Congress narrowly rejected a proposal to create an American parliament to act in concert with the British Parliament; instead, they passed a compact declaring a trade boycott against Britain. [66] [67] The Congress also affirmed that Parliament had no authority over internal American matters, but they were willing to consent to trade regulations for the benefit of the empire, [68] and they authorized committees and conventions to enforce the boycott. The boycott was effective, as imports from Britain dropped by 97% in 1775 compared to 1774. [67]

Parliament refused to yield. In 1775, it declared Massachusetts to be in a state of rebellion and enforced a blockade of the colony. [69] [70] It then passed legislation to limit colonial trade to the British West Indies and the British Isles. Colonial ships were barred from the Newfoundland cod fisheries, a measure which pleased Canadiens but damaged New England's economy. These increasing tensions led to a mutual scramble for ordnance and pushed the colonies toward open war. [71] Thomas Gage was the British Commander-in-Chief and military governor of Massachusetts, and he received orders on April 14, 1775, to disarm the local militias. [72]

Course of the war

War breaks out (1775–1776)

Major campaigns of the American Revolutionary War USMA01 Major Campaigns of the American Revolutionary War.jpg
Major campaigns of the American Revolutionary War

On April 18, 1775, 700 British troops were sent to confiscate militia ordnance stored at Concord. [73] [74] Fighting broke out, forcing the troops to conduct a fighting withdrawal to Boston. Overnight, the local militia converged on and laid siege to Boston. [75] On May 25, 4,500 British reinforcements arrived with generals William Howe, John Burgoyne, and Henry Clinton. [76] The British seized the Charlestown peninsula on June 17 after a costly frontal assault, [77] [78] leading Howe to replace Gage. [79] Many senior officers were dismayed at the attack, which had gained them little, [80] while Gage wrote to London stressing the need for a large army to suppress the revolt. [81] On July 3, George Washington took command of the Continental Army besieging Boston. Howe made no effort to attack, much to Washington's surprise. [82] A plan was rejected to assault the city, [83] and the Americans instead fortified Dorchester Heights in early March 1776 with heavy artillery captured from a raid on Fort Ticonderoga. [84] The British were permitted to withdraw unmolested on March 17, and they sailed to Halifax, Nova Scotia. Washington then moved his army to New York. [85]

Starting in August 1775, American Privateers began to raid villages in Nova Scotia, first at Saint John, then Charlottetown and Yarmouth. They continued in 1776 at Canso and then a land assault on Fort Cumberland.

The British marching to Concord British Army in Concord Detail.jpg
The British marching to Concord

Meanwhile, British officials in Quebec began lobbying Indian tribes to support them, [86] while the Americans urged them to maintain their neutrality. [87] [88] In April 1775, Congress feared an Anglo-Indian attack from Canada and authorized an invasion of Quebec. Quebec had a largely Francophone population and had been under British rule for only 12 years, [89] and the Americans expected that they would welcome being liberated from the British. [90] [91] [92] The Americans attacked Quebec City on December 31 after an arduous march [93] but were defeated. [94] [95] After a loose siege, the Americans withdrew on May 6. 1776. [96] [97] A failed counter-attack on June 8 ended American operations in Quebec. [98] However, the British could not conduct an aggressive pursuit because of American ships on Lake Champlain. On October 11, the British defeated the American squadron, forcing them to withdraw to Ticonderoga and ending the campaign. The invasion cost the Patriots their support in British public opinion, [99] while aggressive anti-Loyalist policies diluted Canadian support. [100] The Patriots continued to view Quebec as a strategic aim, though no further attempts to invade were ever made. [101]

British soldiers and Provincial militiamen repulse the American assault at Sault-au-Matelot, Canada, December 1775 Canadian militiamen and British soldiers repulse the American assault at Sault-au-Matelot.jpg
British soldiers and Provincial militiamen repulse the American assault at Sault-au-Matelot, Canada, December 1775

In Virginia, Royal governor Lord Dunmore had attempted to disarm the militia as tensions increased, although no fighting broke out. [102] He issued a proclamation on November 7, 1775, promising freedom for slaves who fled their Patriot masters to fight for the Crown. [103] [104] Dunmore's troops were overwhelmed by Patriots at Great Bridge, and Dunmore fled to naval ships anchored off Norfolk. Subsequent negotiations broke down, so Dunmore ordered the ships to destroy the town. [105]

Fighting broke out on November 19 in South Carolina between Loyalist and Patriot militias, [106] and the Loyalists were subsequently driven out of the colony. [107] Loyalists were recruited in North Carolina to reassert colonial rule in the South, but they were decisively defeated and Loyalist sentiment was subdued. [108] A troop of British regulars set out to reconquer South Carolina and launched an attack on Charleston on June 28, 1776, [109] but it failed and effectively left the South in Patriot control until 1780. [110] [111]

The shortage of gunpowder had led Congress to authorize an expedition against the Bahamas colony in the British West Indies in order to secure ordnance there. [112] On March 3, 1776, the Americans landed after a bloodless exchange of fire, and the local militia offered no resistance. [113] They confiscated all the supplies that they could load and sailed away on March 17. [114] [115] The squadron reached New London, Connecticut on April 8, after a brief skirmish with the Royal Navy frigate HMS Glasgow on April 6. [116]

Political reactions

After fighting began, Congress launched a final attempt to avert war, which Parliament rejected as insincere. [117] King George then issued a Proclamation of Rebellion on August 23, 1775, which only served to embolden the colonists in their determination to become independent. [118] After a speech by the King, Parliament rejected coercive measures on the colonies by 170 votes. [119] British Tories refused to compromise, [120] while Whigs argued that current policy would drive the colonists towards independence. [121] Despite opposition, the King himself began micromanaging the war effort. [122] The Irish Parliament pledged to send troops to America, [123] and Irish Catholics were allowed to enlist in the army for the first time. [124] Irish Protestants favored the Americans, while Catholics favored the King. [125]

The initial hostilities provided a sobering military lesson for the British, causing them to rethink their views on colonial military capability. [126] [127] The weak British response gave the Patriots the advantage, and the British lost control over every colony. [128] The army had been deliberately kept small in England since 1688 to prevent abuses of power by the King. [129] Parliament secured treaties with small German states for additional troops [130] and sent an army of 32,000 men to America after a year, the largest that it had ever sent outside Europe at the time. [131]

In the colonies, the success of Thomas Paine's pamphlet Common Sense had boosted public support for independence. [132] [133] On July 2, Congress voted in favor of independence with twelve affirmatives and one abstention, [134] issuing its declaration on July 4. [135] Washington read the declaration to his men and the citizens of New York on July 9, [136] invigorating the crowd to tear down a lead statue of the King and melting it to make bullets. [137] British Tories criticized the signatories for not extending the same standards of equality to slaves.

Patriots followed independence with the Test Laws, requiring residents to swear allegiance to the state in which they lived, [138] intending to root out neutrals or opponents to independence. Failure to do so meant possible imprisonment, exile, or even death. [139] American Tories were barred from public office, forbidden from practising medicine and law, forced to pay increased taxes, or even barred from executing wills or becoming guardians to orphans. [140] [141] Congress enabled states to confiscate Loyalist property to fund the war. [142] Some Quakers who remained neutral had their property confiscated. States later prevented Loyalists from collecting any debts that they were owed. [143]

British counter-offensive (1776–1777)

American soldiers in combat at the Battle of Long Island, 1776 BattleofLongisland.jpg
American soldiers in combat at the Battle of Long Island, 1776

After regrouping at Halifax, William Howe determined to take the fight to the Americans. [144] He set sail in June 1776 and began landing troops on Staten Island near the entrance to New York Harbor on July 2. Due to poor military intelligence, Washington split his army to positions on Manhattan Island and across the East River in western Long Island, [145] and an informal attempt to negotiate peace was rejected by the Americans. [146] On August 27, Howe outflanked Washington and forced him back to Brooklyn Heights. Howe restrained his subordinates from pursuit, opting to besiege Washington instead. [147]

Washington withdrew to Manhattan without any losses in men or ordnance. [148] Following the withdrawal, the Staten Island Peace Conference failed to negotiate peace, as the British delegates did not possess the authority to recognize independence. [149] [150] Howe then seized control of New York City on September 15, and unsuccessfully engaged the Americans the following day. [151] He attempted to encircle Washington, but the Americans successfully withdrew. On October 28, the British fought an indecisive action against Washington, in which Howe declined to attack Washington's army, instead concentrating his efforts upon a hill that was of no strategic value. [152] [153]

British warships forcing passage of the Hudson River Forcing a Passage of the Hudson.jpg
British warships forcing passage of the Hudson River

Washington's retreat left his forces isolated, and the British captured an American fortification on November 16, taking 3,000 prisoners and amounting to what one historian terms "the most disastrous defeat of the entire war". [154] Washington's army fell back four days later. [155] Henry Clinton then captured Newport, Rhode Island, an operation which he opposed, feeling that the 6,000 troops assigned to him could have been better employed in the pursuit of Washington. [156] [157] [158] The American prisoners were then sent to the infamous prison ships in which more American soldiers and sailors died of disease and neglect than died in every battle of the war combined. [159] Charles Cornwallis pursued Washington, but Howe ordered him to halt, and Washington marched away unmolested. [160] [161]

The outlook of the American cause was bleak; the army had dwindled to fewer than 5,000 men and would be reduced further when the enlistments expired at the end of the year. [162] Popular support wavered, morale ebbed away, and Congress abandoned Philadelphia. [163] Loyalist activity surged in the wake of the American defeat, especially in New York. [141]

Emanuel Leutze's famous 1851 depiction of Washington Crossing the Delaware Washington Crossing the Delaware by Emanuel Leutze, MMA-NYC, 1851.jpg
Emanuel Leutze's famous 1851 depiction of Washington Crossing the Delaware

News of the campaign was well received in Britain. Festivities took place in London, public support reached a peak, [164] [165] and the King awarded the Order of the Bath to William Howe. The successes led to predictions that the British could win within a year. [166] The American defeat revealed what one writer views as Washington's strategic deficiencies, such as dividing a numerically weaker army in the face of a stronger one, his inexperienced staff misreading the situation, and his troops fleeing in disorder when fighting began. [167] In the meantime, the British entered winter quarters and were in a good place to resume campaigning. [168]

On December 25, 1776, Washington stealthily crossed the Delaware River, and his army overwhelmed the Hessian garrison at Trenton, New Jersey, the following morning, taking 900 prisoners. [169] [170] The decisive victory rescued the army's flagging morale and gave a new hope to the cause for independence. [171] Cornwallis marched to retake Trenton, but his efforts were repulsed on January 2. [172] [173] Washington outmanoeuvred Cornwallis that night, and defeated his rearguard the following day. The victories proved instrumental in convincing the French and Spanish that the Americans were worthwhile allies, as well as recovering morale in the army. [174] [175] [176] Washington entered winter quarters at Morristown, New Jersey, on January 6, [177] though a protracted guerrilla conflict continued. [178] While encamped, Howe made no attempt to attack, much to Washington's amazement. [179]

British northern strategy fails (1777–1778)

In December 1776, John Burgoyne returned to London to set strategy with Lord George Germain. Burgoyne's plan was to establish control of the Champlain-George-Hudson route from New York to Quebec, isolating New England. Efforts could then be concentrated on the southern colonies, where it was believed Loyalist support was in abundance. [180]

"The Surrender at Saratoga" shows General Daniel Morgan in front of a French de Valliere 4-pounder. Surrender of General Burgoyne.jpg
"The Surrender at Saratoga" shows General Daniel Morgan in front of a French de Vallière 4-pounder.

Burgoyne's plan was to lead an army along Lake Champlain, while a strategic diversion advanced along the Mohawk River, and both would rendezvous at Albany. [181] Burgoyne set out on June 14, 1777, quickly capturing Ticonderoga on July 5. Leaving 1,300 men behind as a garrison, Burgoyne continued the advance. Progress was slow; the Americans blocked roads, destroyed bridges, dammed streams and denuded the area of food. [182] Meanwhile, Barry St. Ledger's diversionary column laid siege to Fort Stanwix. St. Ledger withdrew to Quebec on August 22 after his Indian support abandoned him. On August 16, a Hessian foraging expedition was soundly defeated at Bennington, and more than 700 troops were captured. [183] Meanwhile, the vast majority of Burgoyne's Indian support abandoned him and Howe informed Burgoyne he would launch his campaign on Philadelphia as planned, and would be unable to render aid. [184]

Burgoyne decided to continue the advance. On September 19, he attempted to flank the American position, and clashed at Freeman's Farm. The British won, but at the cost of 600 casualties. Burgoyne then dug in, but suffered a constant haemorrhage of deserters, and critical supplies were running low. [185] On October 7, a British reconnaissance in force against the American lines was repulsed with heavy losses. Burgoyne then withdrew with the Americans in pursuit, and by October 13, he was surrounded. With no hope of relief and supplies exhausted, Burgoyne surrendered on October 17, and 6,222 soldiers became prisoners of the Americans. [186] The decisive success spurred France to enter the war as an ally of the United States, securing the final elements needed for victory over Britain, that of foreign assistance. [187] [188]

Washington and Lafayette inspect the troops at Valley Forge. Washington and Lafayette at Valley Forge.jpg
Washington and Lafayette inspect the troops at Valley Forge.

Meanwhile, Howe launched his campaign against Washington, though his initial efforts to bring him to battle in June 1777 failed. [189] Howe declined to attack Philadelphia overland via New Jersey, or by sea via the Delaware Bay, even though both options would have enabled him to assist Burgoyne if necessary. Instead, he took his army on a time-consuming route through the Chesapeake Bay, leaving him completely unable to assist Burgoyne. This decision was so difficult to understand, Howe's critics accused him of treason. [190]

Howe outflanked and defeated Washington on September 11, though he failed to follow-up on the victory and destroy his army. [191] [192] A British victory at Willistown left Philadelphia defenceless, and Howe captured the city unopposed on September 26. Howe then moved 9,000 men to Germantown, north of Philadelphia. [193] Washington launched a surprise attack on Howe's garrison on October 4, which was eventually repulsed. [194] Again, Howe did not follow-up on his victory, leaving the American army intact and able to fight. [195] Later, after several days of probing American defences at White Marsh, Howe inexplicably ordered a retreat to Philadelphia, astonishing both sides. [196] Howe ignored the vulnerable American rear, where an attack could have deprived Washington of his baggage and supplies. [197] On December 19, Washington's army entered winter quarters at Valley Forge. Poor conditions and supply problems resulted in the deaths of some 2,500 troops. [198] Howe, only 20 miles (32 km) away, made no effort to attack, which critics observed could have ended the war. [199] [200] [201]

The Continental Army was put through a new training program, supervised by Baron von Steuben, introducing the most modern Prussian methods of drilling. [202] Meanwhile, Howe resigned and was replaced by Henry Clinton on May 24, 1778. [203] Clinton received orders to abandon Philadelphia and fortify New York following France's entry into the war. On June 18, the British departed Philadelphia, with the reinvigorated Americans in pursuit. [204] The two armies fought at Monmouth Court House on June 28, with the Americans holding the field, greatly boosting morale and confidence. [205] By July, both armies were back in the same positions they had been two years prior.

Foreign intervention

The defeat at Saratoga caused considerable anxiety in Britain over foreign intervention. The North ministry sought reconciliation with the colonies by consenting to their original demands, [206] although Lord North refused to grant independence. [207] No positive reply was received from the Americans. [208]

French troops storming Redoubt 9 during the Siege of Yorktown Redoubt-9.jpg
French troops storming Redoubt 9 during the Siege of Yorktown

French foreign minister the Comte de Vergennes was strongly anti-British, [209] and he sought a pretext for going to war with Britain following the conquest of Canada in 1763. [210] The French had covertly supplied the Americans through neutral Dutch ports since the onset of the war, [209] proving invaluable throughout the Saratoga campaign. [211] [212] [213] The French public favored war, though Vergennes and King Louis XVI were hesitant, owing to the military and financial risk. [214] The American victory at Saratoga convinced the French that supporting the Patriots was worthwhile, [215] but doing so also brought major concerns. The King was concerned that Britain's concessions would be accepted, and that Britain would then reconcile with the Colonies to strike at French and Spanish possessions in the Caribbean. [216] [217] To prevent this, France formally recognized the United States on February 6, 1778, and followed with a military alliance. France aimed to expel Britain from the Newfoundland fishery, end restrictions on Dunkirk sovereignty, regain free trade in India, recover Senegal and Dominica, and restore the Treaty of Utrecht provisions pertaining to Anglo-French trade. [218] [219]

Spain was wary of provoking war with Britain before being ready and opted to covertly supply the Patriots via its colonies in New Spain. [220] [221] Congress hoped to persuade Spain into an open alliance, so the first American Commission met with the Count of Aranda in 1776. [222] Spain was still reluctant to make an early commitment, owing to a lack of direct French involvement, the threat against their treasure fleets, and the possibility of war with Portugal, Spain's neighbor and a close ally of Britain. [223] However, Spain affirmed its desire to support the Americans the following year, hoping to weaken Britain's empire. [224] The Portuguese threat was neutralized in the Spanish–Portuguese War (1776–77). On 12 April 1779, Spain signed the Treaty of Aranjuez with France and went to war against Britain. [225] Spain sought to recover Gibraltar and Menorca in Europe, as well as Mobile and Pensacola in Florida, and also to expel the British from Central America. [226] [227]

Meanwhile, George III had given up on subduing America while Britain had a European war to fight. [228] He did not welcome war with France, but he believed that Britain had made all necessary steps to avoid it and cited the British victories over France in the Seven Years' War as a reason to remain optimistic. [229] Britain tried in vain to find a powerful ally to engage France, leaving it isolated, [230] preventing Britain from focusing the majority of her efforts in one theater, [231] [232] and forcing a major diversion of military resources from America. [233] [234] Despite this, the King determined never to recognize American independence and to ravage the colonies indefinitely, or until they pleaded to return to the yoke of the Crown. [235] Mahan argues that Britain's attempt to fight in multiple theaters simultaneously without major allies was fundamentally flawed, citing impossible mutual support, exposing the forces to defeat in detail. [236]

Since the outbreak of the conflict, Britain had appealed to her ally, the neutral Dutch Republic, to lend her the use of the Scots Brigade for service in America, but pro-American sentiment among the Dutch public forced them to deny the request. [237] Consequently, the British attempted to invoke several treaties for outright Dutch military support, but the Republic still refused. Moreover, American troops were being supplied with ordnance by Dutch merchants via their West Indies colonies. [238] French supplies bound for America had also passed through Dutch ports. [209] The Republic maintained free trade with France following France's declaration of war on Britain, citing a prior concession by Britain on this issue. Britain responded by confiscating Dutch shipping, and even firing upon it. Consequently, the Republic joined the First League of Armed Neutrality to enforce their neutral status. [239] The Republic had also given sanctuary to American privateers [240] and had drafted a treaty of commerce with the Americans. Britain argued that these actions contravened the Republic's neutral stance and declared war in December 1780. [241]

Overseas warfare (1778–1780)


The Moonlight Battle of Cape St. Vincent, 16 January 1780 by Francis Holman, painted 1780 Holman, Cape St Vincent.jpg
The Moonlight Battle of Cape St. Vincent, 16 January 1780 by Francis Holman, painted 1780

Soon after France declared war, French and British fleets fought an indecisive action off Ushant on July 27, 1778. [242] Spain entered the war on April 12, 1779 with a primary goal of capturing Gibraltar, [243] and Spanish troops under the Duc de Crillon laid siege to the Rock on June 24. [244] The naval blockade, however, was relatively weak, and the British were able to resupply the garrison. [245] Meanwhile, a plan was formulated for a combined Franco-Spanish invasion of the British mainland, but the expedition failed due to a combination of poor planning, disease, logistical issues, and high financial expenditures. [246] [247] However, a diversionary Franco-American squadron did meet with some success on September 23 under John Paul Jones. [248] On 16 January 1780, the Royal Navy under George Rodney scored a major victory over the Spanish, weakening the naval blockade of Gibraltar. [249]

A Franco-Spanish fleet commanded by Luis de Córdova intercepted and decisively defeated a large British convoy off the Azores led by John Moutray on August 9 which was bound for the West Indies. [250] The defeat was catastrophic for Britain, which lost 52 merchant ships [251] [252] and five East Indiamen, [253] [254] as well as supplies and crews, [255] making it one of the most complete naval captures ever made. [256] The loss was valued at some £1.5 million (£181 million in today's money), dealing a severe blow to British commerce. [257] [258]


The French blockaded the lucrative sugar islands of Barbados and Jamaica, intending to damage British trade. [259] French troops led by the Marquis de Bouillé captured Dominica on September 7, 1778, in order to improve communication among French Caribbean islands and to strike a blow against privateering. [260] [261] The British defeated a French naval force on December 15 and captured St. Lucia on December 28. [262] Both fleets received reinforcements through the first half of 1779, but the French under the Comte d'Estaing had superiority in the Caribbean and began capturing British territories, [263] seizing St. Vincent on June 18 and Grenada on July 4. [264] The British fleet under John Byron was tactically defeated on July 6, having pursued d'Estaing from Grenada, [265] the worst loss that the Royal Navy had suffered since 1690. [266] Naval skirmishes continued until April 17, 1780, when British and French fleets clashed indecisively off Martinique.

General Bernardo de Gálvez raised an army in New Orleans and drove the British out of the Gulf of Mexico. He captured five British forts in the Lower Mississippi Valley, and they repelled a British and Indian attack in St. Louis, Missouri and captured the British fort of St. Joseph in Niles, Michigan. He received reinforcements from Cuba, Mexico, and Puerto Rico, then captured Mobile and Pensacola, the capital of the British colony of West Florida. [267] At Pensacola, Gálvez commanded a multinational army of more than 7,000 black and white soldiers born in Spain, Cuba, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Santo Domingo, and other Spanish colonies such as Venezuela. [268]

In Central America, the defense of Guatemala was a priority for Spain. The British intended to capture the key fortress of San Fernando de Omoa and drive the Spanish from the region. [269] After inadequate first attempts, 1,200 British troops led by William Dalrymple arrived on October 16, and they captured the fort on October 20. [270] However, the British suffered terribly due to disease and were forced to abandon the fort on November 29, [271] and Spanish troops subsequently reoccupied it. [272] In 1780, Jamaica's governor John Dalling planned an expedition to cut New Spain in two by capturing Granada, which would allow them full control of the San Juan River. [273] A British expedition set out on February 3, 1780, led by John Polson and Horatio Nelson. [274] They reached Fort San Juan on March 17 and laid siege, capturing it on April 29. [275] The British were ravaged by disease [276] and were running low on food due to poor logistics. [274] They withdrew on November 8, the expedition having suffered a decisive defeat; [277] some 2,500 troops had perished, making it the costliest British disaster of the war. [278]


Mysorean troops defeat the British at Pollilur, using rockets against closely massed British infantry Rocket warfare.jpg
Mysorean troops defeat the British at Pollilur, using rockets against closely massed British infantry

The British East India Company moved quickly to capture French possessions in India when they learned about the hostilities with France, and they took Pondicherry on 19 October 1778 after a two-week siege. [279] The Company resolved to drive the French completely out of India, [280] and they captured the Malabar port of Mahé in 1779 [281] where French ordnance passed through.

Mahé was under the protection of Mysore's ruler Hyder Ali (the Tipu Sultan), and tensions were already inflamed because the British had supported Malabar rebels who had risen against him; [282] so the fall of Mahé precipitated war. [283] Hyder Ali invaded the Carnatic region in July 1780 and laid siege to Tellicherry and Arcot. A British relief force of 7,000 men [284] under William Baille was intercepted and destroyed by the Tipu Sultan on 10 September, the worst defeat suffered by a European army in India at the time. [285]

Ali then renewed the siege at Arcot instead of pressing on for a decisive victory against a second British army at Madras, capturing it on 3 November. The delay allowed British forces to regroup for campaigning the following year. [286]

Stalemate in the North (1778–1780)

"Give 'em Watts, boys!" - American troops repulse Wilhelm von Knyphausen's attack at Springfield Battle of Springfield NJ 1780.jpg
"Give 'em Watts, boys!" – American troops repulse Wilhelm von Knyphausen's attack at Springfield

Henry Clinton withdrew from Philadelphia, consolidating his forces in New York following the British defeat at Saratoga and the entry of France into the war. [234] French admiral the Comte d'Estaing had been dispatched to America in April 1778 to assist Washington, and he arrived shortly after Clinton withdrew into New York. [287] The Franco-American forces felt that New York's defenses were too formidable for the French fleet, [288] and they opted to attack Newport. [289] This effort was launched on August 29, but it failed when the French opted to withdraw, and this displeased the Americans. [290] The war then ground down to a stalemate, with the majority of actions fought as large skirmishes, such as those at Chestnut Neck and Little Egg Harbor. In the summer of 1779, the Americans captured British posts at Stony Point and Paulus Hook. [291] [292]

In July, Clinton unsuccessfully attempted to coax Washington into a decisive engagement by making a major raid into Connecticut. [293] That month, a large American naval operation attempted to retake Maine, but it resulted in the worst American naval defeat until Pearl Harbor in 1941. [294] The high frequency of Iroquois raids compelled Washington to mount a punitive expedition which destroyed a large number of Iroquois settlements, but the effort ultimately failed to stop the raids. [295] [296] During the winter of 1779–80, the Continental Army suffered greater hardships than at Valley Forge. [297] Morale was poor, public support was being eroded by the long war, the national currency was virtually worthless, the army was plagued with supply problems, desertion was common, and whole regiments mutinied over the conditions in early 1780. [298]

Hamilton surrenders at Vincennes, February 29, 1779 Vincennes 1779.jpg
Hamilton surrenders at Vincennes, February 29, 1779

In 1780, Clinton launched an attempt to retake New Jersey. On June 7, 6,000 men invaded under Hessian general Wilhelm von Knyphausen, but they met stiff resistance from the local militia. The British held the field, but Knyphausen feared a general engagement with Washington's main army and withdrew. [299] Knyphausen and Clinton decided upon a second attempt two weeks later which was soundly defeated at Springfield, effectively ending British ambitions in New Jersey. [300] Meanwhile, American general Benedict Arnold turned traitor and joined the British army, and he conspired to betray the key American fortress of West Point by surrendering it to the enemy. [301] The plot was foiled when British spy master John André was captured, so Arnold fled to British lines in New York. He attempted to justify his betrayal by appealing to Loyalist public opinion, but the Patriots strongly condemned him as a coward and turncoat. [302]

The war to the west of the Appalachians was largely confined to skirmishing and raids. An expedition of militia was halted due to adverse weather in February 1778 after it set out to destroy British military supplies in settlements along the Cuyahoga River. [303] Later in the year, a second campaign was undertaken to seize the Illinois Country from the British. The Americans captured Kaskaskia on July 4 and then secured Vincennes, although Vincennes was recaptured by Henry Hamilton, the British commander at Detroit. In early 1779, the Americans counter-attacked by undertaking a risky winter march, and they secured the surrender of the British at Vincennes, taking Hamilton prisoner. [304] [305]

On May 25, 1780, the British launched an expedition into Kentucky as part of a wider operation to clear resistance from Quebec to the Gulf coast. The expedition met with only limited success, though hundreds of settlers were killed or captured. [306] The Americans responded with a major offensive along the Mad River in August which met with some success, but it did little to abate the Indian raids on the frontier. [307] French militia attempted to capture Detroit, but it ended in disaster when Miami Indians ambushed and defeated the gathered troops on November 5. [308] The war in the west had become a stalemate; the Americans did not have the manpower to simultaneously defeat the hostile Indian tribes and occupy the land. [309]

War in the South (1778–1781)

British troops besiege Charleston in 1780, by Alonzo Chappel Sullivans-island-1050x777.jpg
British troops besiege Charleston in 1780, by Alonzo Chappel

The British turned their attention to conquering the South in 1778 after Loyalists in London assured them of a strong Loyalist base there. A southern campaign also had the advantage of keeping the Royal Navy closer to the Caribbean, where it would be needed to defend lucrative colonies against the Franco-Spanish fleets. [310] On December 29, 1778, an expeditionary corps from New York captured Savannah, and British troops then moved inland to recruit Loyalist support. [311] There was a promising initial turnout in early 1779, but then a large Loyalist militia was defeated at Kettle Creek on February 14 and they had to recognize their dependence upon the British. The British, however, defeated Patriot militia at Brier Creek on March 3, [312] and then launched an abortive assault on Charleston, South Carolina. The operation became notorious for its high degree of looting by British troops, enraging both Loyalists and Patriots. [313]

In October, a combined Franco-American effort failed to recapture Savannah. In May 1780, Henry Clinton captured Charleston, taking over 5,000 prisoners and effectively destroying the Continental Army in the south. Organized American resistance in the region collapsed when Banastre Tarleton defeated the withdrawing Americans at Waxhaws on May 29. [314]

American and British cavalry clash at the Battle of Cowpens; from an 1845 painting by William Ranney Cowpens.jpg
American and British cavalry clash at the Battle of Cowpens; from an 1845 painting by William Ranney

Clinton returned to New York, leaving Charles Cornwallis in command in Charleston to oversee the southern war effort. Far fewer Loyalists joined him than expected. In the interim, the war was carried on by Patriot militias who effectively suppressed Loyalists by winning victories in Fairfield County, Lincolnton, Huck's Defeat, Stanly County, and Lancaster County.

The British launched a surprise offensive in Virginia in January 1781, with Benedict Arnold invading Richmond, Virginia to little resistance. Governor Thomas Jefferson escaped Richmond just ahead of the British forces, and the British burned the city to the ground. [315] [316] Jefferson sent an emergency dispatch to Colonel Sampson Mathews whose militia was traveling nearby, to thwart Arnold's efforts. [317] [318]

Congress appointed Horatio Gates, victor at Saratoga, to lead the American effort in the south. He suffered a major defeat at Camden on August 16, 1780, setting the stage for Cornwallis to invade North Carolina. [319] The British attempted to subjugate the countryside, and Patriot militia continued to fight against them, so Cornwallis dispatched troops to raise Loyalist forces to cover his left flank as he moved north. [320] This wing of Cornwallis' army was virtually destroyed on October 7, irreversibly breaking Loyalist support in the Carolinas. Cornwallis subsequently aborted his advance and retreated back into South Carolina. [321] In the interim, Washington replaced Gates with his trusted subordinate Nathanael Greene. [322]

Greene was unable to confront the British directly, so he dispatched a force under Daniel Morgan to recruit additional troops. Morgan then defeated the cream of the British army under Tarleton on January 17, 1781 at Cowpens. Cornwallis was criticized for having detached a substantial part of his army without adequate support, [323] but he advanced into North Carolina despite the setbacks, gambling that he would receive substantial Loyalist support there. Greene evaded combat with Cornwallis, instead wearing the British down through a protracted war of attrition. [324]

By March, Greene's army had increased in size enough that he felt confident in facing Cornwallis. The two armies engaged at Guilford Courthouse on March 15; Greene was beaten, but Cornwallis' army suffered irreplaceable casualties. [325] Compounding this, far fewer Loyalists were joining than the British had previously expected. [326] Cornwallis' casualties were such that he was compelled to retreat to Wilmington for reinforcement, leaving the Patriots in control of the interior of the Carolinas and Georgia.

Greene then proceeded to reclaim the South. The American troops suffered a reversal at Hobkirk's Hill on April 25; [327] nonetheless, they continued to dislodge strategic British posts in the area, capturing Fort Watson [328] and Fort Motte. [329] Augusta was the last major British outpost in the South outside of Charleston and Savannah, but the Americans reclaimed possession of it on June 6. [330] A British force clashed with American troops at Eutaw Springs on September 8 in a final effort to stop Greene, but the British casualties were so high that they withdrew to Charleston. [331] Minor skirmishes continued in the Carolinas until the end of the war, and British troops were effectively confined to Charleston and Savannah for the remainder of the conflict. [332]

British defeat in America (1781)

The French (left) and British (right) lines exchange fire at the Battle of the Chesapeake BattleOfVirginiaCapes.jpg
The French (left) and British (right) lines exchange fire at the Battle of the Chesapeake

Cornwallis had discovered that the majority of American supplies in the Carolinas were passing through Virginia, and he had written to both Lord Germain and Clinton detailing his intentions to invade. Cornwallis believed that a successful campaign there would cut supplies to Greene's army and precipitate a collapse of American resistance in the South. Clinton strongly opposed the plan, favoring a campaign farther north in the Chesapeake Bay region. [333] Lord Germain wrote to Cornwallis to approve his plan and neglected to include Clinton in the decision-making, even though Clinton was Cornwallis' superior officer, [334] and Cornwallis then decided to move into Virginia without informing Clinton. [335] Clinton, however, had failed to construct a coherent strategy for British operations in 1781, [336] owing to his difficult relationship with his naval counterpart Marriot Arbuthnot. [337]

Following the calamitous operations at Newport and Savannah, French planners realized that closer cooperation with the Americans was required to achieve success. [338] The French fleet led by the Comte de Grasse had received discretionary orders from Paris to assist joint efforts in the north if naval support was needed. [339] [340] Washington and the Comte de Rochambeau discussed their options. Washington pushed for an attack on New York, while Rochambeau preferred a strike in Virginia where the British were less well-established and thus easier to defeat. [341] Franco-American movements around New York caused Clinton a great deal of anxiety, fearing an attack on the city. His instructions were vague to Cornwallis during this time, rarely forming explicit orders. However, Clinton did instruct Cornwallis to establish a fortified naval base and to transfer troops to the north to defend New York. [342] Cornwallis dug in at Yorktown and awaited the Royal Navy. [343]

Surrender of Cornwallis at Yorktown by John Trumbull, 1797 Surrender of Lord Cornwallis.jpg
Surrender of Cornwallis at Yorktown by John Trumbull, 1797
Washington and the Comte de Rochambeau at Yorktown, 1781 Couder Yorktown Versailles.JPG
Washington and the Comte de Rochambeau at Yorktown, 1781

Washington still favored an assault on New York, but he acquiesced to the French when they opted to send their fleet to their preferred target of Yorktown. In August, the combined Franco-American army moved south to coordinate with de Grasse in defeating Cornwallis. [344] The British lacked sufficient naval resources to effectively counter the French, but they dispatched a fleet under Thomas Graves to assist Cornwallis and attempt to gain naval dominance. [345] On September 5, the French fleet decisively defeated Graves, giving the French control of the seas around Yorktown and cutting off Cornwallis from reinforcements and relief. [346] Despite the continued urging of his subordinates, [347] Cornwallis made no attempt to break out and engage the Franco-American army before it had established siege works, expecting that reinforcements would arrive from New York, and the Franco-American army laid siege to Yorktown on September 28. [348] Cornwallis continued to think that relief was imminent from Clinton, and he abandoned his outer defenses which were immediately occupied by American troops—serving to hasten his subsequent defeat. [349] The British then failed in an attempt to break out of the siege across the river at Gloucester Point when a storm hit. [350] Cornwallis and his subordinates were under increasing bombardment and facing dwindling supplies; they agreed that their situation was untenable and negotiated a surrender on October 17, 1781, [351] and 7,685 soldiers became prisoners of the Americans. [352] The same day as the surrender, 6,000 troops under Clinton had departed New York, sailing to relieve Yorktown. [353] [354]

North Ministry collapses

On 25 November 1781, news arrived in London of the surrender at Yorktown. The Whig opposition gained traction in Parliament, and a motion was proposed on December 12 to end the war which was defeated by only one vote. On 27 February 1782, the House voted against further war in America by 19 votes. [355]

Lord Germain was dismissed and a vote of no confidence was passed against North. The Rockingham Whigs came to power and opened negotiations for peace. Rockingham died and was succeeded by the Earl of Shelburne. Despite their defeat, the British still had 30,000 troops garrisoned in New York, Charleston, and Savannah. [356] Henry Clinton was recalled and was replaced by Guy Carleton who was under orders to suspend offensive operations. [357]

Final years of the war (1781–1783)

The Defeat of the Floating Batteries at Gibraltar, September 13, 1782, by John Singleton Copley The Siege and Relief of Gibraltar (2).jpg
The Defeat of the Floating Batteries at Gibraltar , September 13, 1782, by John Singleton Copley


After hostilities with the Dutch began in late 1780, Britain had moved quickly, enforcing a blockade across the North Sea. Within weeks, the British had captured 200 Dutch merchantmen, and 300 more were holed up in foreign ports, [358] though political turmoil within the Republic [359] and peace negotiations by both sides helped keep conflict to a minimum. [360] The majority of the Dutch public favored a military alliance with France against Britain; however, the Dutch Stadtholder impeded these efforts, hoping to secure an early peace. [361] To restore diminishing trade [362] a Dutch squadron under Johan Zoutman escorted a fleet of some 70 merchantmen from the Texel. Zoutman's ships were intercepted by Sir Hyde Parker, who engaged Zoutman at Dogger Bank on 5 August 1781. Though the contest was tactically inconclusive, the Dutch fleet did not leave harbor again during the war, and their merchant fleet remained crippled. [363]

On 6 January 1781, a French attempt to capture Jersey to neutralize British privateering failed. [364] Frustrated in their attempts to capture Gibraltar, a Franco-Spanish force of 14,000 men under the Duc de Mahon invaded Minorca on 19 August. After a long siege of St. Philip's, the British garrison under James Murray surrendered on 5 February 1782, [365] securing a primary war goal for the Spanish. [366] At Gibraltar, a major Franco-Spanish assault on 13 September 1782 was repulsed with heavy casualties. [367] On 20 October 1782, following a successful resupply of Gibraltar, British ships under Richard Howe successfully refused battle to the Franco-Spanish fleet under Luis de Córdova, denying Córdova dominance at sea. [368] [369] On 7 February 1783, after 1,322 [370] days of siege, the Franco-Spanish army withdrew, decisively defeated. [371] [372]


Spanish troops led by Bernardo de Galvez in combat at Pensacola. Oil on canvas, Augusto Ferrer-Dalmau, 2015. Cuadro por espana y por el rey, Galvez en America.jpg
Spanish troops led by Bernardo de Gálvez in combat at Pensacola. Oil on canvas, Augusto Ferrer-Dalmau, 2015.

Sint Eustatius, a key supply port for the Patriots, was sacked by British forces under George Rodney on 3 February 1781, who plundered the island's wealth. [373] Few operations were conducted against the Dutch, although several Dutch colonies were captured by the British in 1781. [374]

Battle of the Saintes, 12 April 1782 - Admiral George Rodney defeats the Comte De Grasse in the West Indies. Oil on canvas by Thomas Whitcombe The battle of the Saints 12 avril 1782.jpg
Battle of the Saintes, 12 April 1782 – Admiral George Rodney defeats the Comte De Grasse in the West Indies. Oil on canvas by Thomas Whitcombe

After the fall of Mobile to Spanish troops under Bernardo de Gálvez, an attempt to capture Pensacola was thwarted due to a hurricane. Emboldened by the disaster, John Campbell, British commander at Pensacola, decided to recapture Mobile. [375] Campbell's expeditionary force of around 700 men was defeated on 7 January 1781. [376] After re-grouping at Havana, Gálvez set out for Pensacola on 13 February. [377] Arriving on 9 March, siege operations did not begin until 24 March, owing to difficulties in bringing the ships into the bay. [378] After a 45-day siege, Gálvez decisively defeated the garrison, securing the conquest of West Florida. [379] In May, Spanish troops captured the Bahamas, [380] although the British bloodlessly recaptured the islands the following year on 18 April. [381]

In the West Indies, on 29–30 April 1781, a Royal Navy squadron under Samuel Hood was narrowly defeated by the French, led by the Comte de Grasse, [382] who continued seizing British territories: Tobago fell on 2 June; [383] Demerara and Essequibo on 22 January 1782; [384] St. Kitts and Nevis on 12 February, [385] despite a British naval victory on 25 January; [386] and Montserrat on 22 February. [387]

In 1782, the primary strategic goal of the French and Spanish was the capture of Jamaica, [388] whose sugar exports were more valuable to the British than the Thirteen Colonies combined. [389] [390] On 7 April 1782, de Grasse departed Martinique to rendezvous with Franco-Spanish troops at Saint Domingue and invade Jamaica from the north. [391] The British under Hood and George Rodney pursued and decisively defeated the French off Dominica between 9–12 April. [392] [393] The Franco-Spanish plan to conquer Jamaica was in ruins, [394] and the balance of naval power in the Caribbean shifted to the Royal Navy. [395]

In Guatemala, Matías de Gálvez led Spanish troops in an effort to dislocate British settlements along the Gulf of Honduras. [396] Gálvez captured Roatán on 16 March 1782, and then quickly took Black River. [397] Following the decisive naval victory at the Saintes, [398] Archibald Campbell, the Royal governor of Jamaica, authorized Edward Despard to re-take Black River, [399] which he did on 22 August. [400] However, with peace talks opening, and Franco-Spanish resources committed to the siege of Gibraltar, no further offensive operations took place. [400]


The British (right) and the French (left), with Admiral Suffren's flagship Cleopatre on the far left, exchange fire at Cuddalore, by Auguste Jugelet, 1836. Combat naval en rade de Gondelour, 20 juin 1783.jpg
The British (right) and the French (left), with Admiral Suffren's flagship Cléopâtre on the far left, exchange fire at Cuddalore, by Auguste Jugelet, 1836.

Following Dutch entry into the conflict, East India Company troops under Hector Munro captured the Dutch port of Negapatam after a three-week siege on 11 October 1781. [401] Soon after, British Admiral Edward Hughes captured Trincomalee after a brief engagement on 11 January 1782. [402]

In March 1781, French Admiral Bailli de Suffren was dispatched to India to assist colonial efforts. Suffren arrived off the Indian coast in February 1782, where he clashed with a British fleet under Hughes, winning a narrow tactical victory. [403] After landing troops at Porto Novo to assist Mysore, Suffren's fleet clashed with Hughes again Providien on 12 April. There was no clear victor, though Hughes' fleet came off worse, [404] and he withdrew to the British-held port of Trincomalee. Hyder Ali wished for the French to capture Negapatam to establish naval dominance over the British, and this task fell to Suffren. Suffren's fleet clashed with Hughes again off Negapatam on 6 July. [405] Suffren withdrew to Cuddalore, strategically defeated, and the British remained in control of Negapatam. [406] [407] Intending to find a more suitable port than Cuddalore, Suffren captured Trincomalee on 1 September, and successfully engaged Hughes two days later. [408]

Meanwhile, Ali's troops loosely blockaded Vellore as the East India Company regrouped. [409] Company troops under Sir Eyre Coote led a counter-offensive, defeating Ali at Porto Novo on 1 July 1781, [410] Pollilur on 27 August, [411] and Sholinghur on 27 September, expelling the Mysorean troops from the Carnatic. [412] [413] On 18 February 1782, Tipu Sultan defeated John Braithwaite near Tanjore, taking his entire 1,800-strong force prisoner. [414] The war had, by this point, reached an uneasy stalemate. [415] On 7 December 1782, Hyder Ali died, [416] and the rule of Mysore passed to his son, Tipu Sultan. [417]

Sultan advanced along the west coast, laying siege to Mangalore on 20 May 1783. [418] Meanwhile, on the east coast, an army under James Stuart besieged the French-held port of Cuddalore on 9 June 1783. [419] On 20 June, key British naval support for the siege was neutralized when Suffren defeated Hughes' fleet off Cuddalore, [420] and though narrow, the victory gave Suffren the opportunity to displace British holdings in India. [421] On 25 June, the Franco-Mysorean defenders made repeated sorties against British lines, though all assaults failed. On 30 June, news arrived of a preliminary peace between the belligerent powers, and the siege was effectively over when the French abandoned the siege. [422] Mangalore remained under siege, and capitulated to Sultan on 30 January 1784. [423] Little fighting took place thereafter, and Mysore and Britain made peace on 11 March. [414]

Peace of Paris

Benjamin West's painting of the American delegations at the Treaty of Paris. The British delegation refused to pose, and the painting was never completed. Treaty of Paris by Benjamin West 1783.jpg
Benjamin West's painting of the American delegations at the Treaty of Paris. The British delegation refused to pose, and the painting was never completed.

Following the surrender at Yorktown, the Whig party came to power in Britain and began opening negotiations for a cessation of hostilities. While peace negotiations were being undertaken, British troops in America were restricted from launching further offensives. [357] Prime Minister the Earl of Shelburne was reluctant to accept American independence as a prerequisite for peace, as the British were aware that the French economy was nearly bankrupt, and reinforcements sent to the West Indies could potentially reverse the situation there. He preferred that the colonies accept Dominion status within the Empire, though a similar offer had been rejected by the Americans in 1778. [424] Negotiations soon began in Paris.

Washington enters New York in triumph following the British evacuation of America. Evacuation Day and Washington's Triumphal Entry.jpg
Washington enters New York in triumph following the British evacuation of America.

The Americans initially demanded that Quebec be ceded to them as spoils of war, a proposal that was dropped when Shelburne accepted American demands for recognition of independence. On April 19, 1782, the Dutch formally recognized the United States as a sovereign power, enhancing American leverage at the negotiations. Spain initially impeded the negotiations, refusing to enter into peace talks until Gibraltar had been captured. The Comte de Vergennes proposed that American territory be confined to the east of the Appalachians; Britain would have sovereignty over the area north of the Ohio River, below which an Indian barrier state would be established under Spanish control. The United States fiercely opposed the proposal. [425]

The Americans skirted their allies, recognizing that more favorable terms would be found in London. They negotiated directly with Shelburne, who hoped to make Britain a valuable trading partner of America at the expense of France. To this end, Shelburne offered to cede all the land east of the Mississippi River, north of Florida, and south of Quebec, [426] while also allowing American fishermen access to the rich Newfoundland fishery. [427] Shelburne was hoping to facilitate the growth of the American population, creating lucrative markets that Britain could exploit at no administrative cost to London. As Vergennes commented, "the English buy peace rather than make it". [428]

Throughout the negotiations, Britain never consulted her American Indian allies, forcing them to reluctantly accept the treaty. However, the subsequent tension erupted into conflicts between the Indians and the young United States, the largest being the Northwest Indian War. [429] Britain continued trying to create an Indian buffer state in the American Midwest as late as 1814 during the War of 1812. [430] [431]

Britain negotiated separate treaties with Spain, France, and the Dutch Republic. [432] Gibraltar proved to be a stumbling block in the peace talks; Spain offered to relinquish their conquests in West Florida, Menorca, and the Bahamas [433] in exchange for Gibraltar, terms which Shelburne steadfastly refused. Shelburne instead offered to cede East Florida, West Florida, and Menorca if Spain would relinquish the claim on Gibraltar, terms which were reluctantly accepted. [434] However, in the long-term, the new territorial gains were of little value to Spain. [435] France's only net gains were the island of Tobago in the Caribbean and Senegal in Africa, after agreeing to return all other colonial conquests to British sovereignty. [436] Britain returned Dutch Caribbean territories to Dutch sovereignty, in exchange for free trade rights in the Dutch East Indies [437] [438] and control of the Indian port of Negapatnam. [439]

Preliminary peace articles were signed in Paris on 30 November 1782, while preliminaries between Britain, Spain, France, and the Netherlands continued until September 1783. The United States Congress of the Confederation ratified the Treaty of Paris on January 14, 1784. Copies were sent back to Europe for ratification by the other parties involved, the first reaching France in March 1784. British ratification occurred on April 9, 1784, and the ratified versions were exchanged in Paris on May 12, 1784. [440] The war formally concluded on September 3, 1783. [441]

The last British troops departed New York City on November 25, 1783, marking the end of British rule in the new United States. [442]


Casualties and losses

Americans and allies

The total loss of life throughout the conflict is largely unknown. As was typical in wars of the era, diseases such as smallpox claimed more lives than battle. Between 1775 and 1782, a smallpox epidemic broke out throughout North America, killing 40 people in Boston alone. Historian Joseph Ellis suggests that Washington's decision to have his troops inoculated against the disease was one of his most important decisions. [443]

Between 25,000 and 70,000 American Patriots died during active military service. [31] Of these, approximately 6,800 were killed in battle, while at least 17,000 died from disease. The majority of the latter died while prisoners of war of the British, mostly in the prison ships in New York Harbor. [32] If the upper limit of 70,000 is accepted as the total net loss for the Patriots, it would make the conflict proportionally deadlier than the American Civil War. [12] Uncertainty arises due to the difficulties in accurately calculating the number of those who succumbed to disease, as it is estimated at least 10,000 died in 1776 alone. [12] The number of Patriots seriously wounded or disabled by the war has been estimated from 8,500 to 25,000. [444]

The French suffered approximately 7,000 total dead throughout the conflict; of those, 2,112 were killed in combat in the American theaters of war. [33]

The Dutch suffered around 500 total killed, owing to the minor scale of their conflict with Britain. [35]

British and allies

British returns in 1783 listed 43,633 rank and file deaths across the British Armed Forces. [37] A table from 1781 puts total British Army deaths at 9,372 soldiers killed in battle across the Americas; 6,046 in North America (1775–1779), and 3,326 in the West Indies (1778–1780). [38] In 1784, a British lieutenant compiled a detailed list of 205 British officers killed in action during the war, encompassing Europe, the Caribbean and the East Indies. [445] Extrapolations based upon this list puts British Army losses in the area of at least 4,000 killed or died of wounds. [12] Approximately 7,774 Germans died in British service in addition to 4,888 deserters; of the former, it is estimated 1,800 were killed in combat. [12]

Around 171,000 sailors served in the Royal Navy during the war; approximately a quarter of whom had been pressed into service. Around 1,240 were killed in battle, while an estimated 18,500 died from disease (1776–1780). [40] The greatest killer at sea was scurvy, a disease caused by vitamin C deficiency. [446] It was not until 1795 that scurvy was eradicated from the Royal Navy after the Admiralty declared lemon juice and sugar were to be issued among the standard daily rations of sailors. [447] Around 42,000 sailors deserted during the war. [448] The impact on merchant shipping was substantial; an estimated 3,386 merchant ships were seized by enemy forces during the war; [449] of those, 2,283 were taken by American privateers alone. [450]

Financial debts

At the start of the war, the economy of the colonies was flourishing, [451] and the free white population enjoyed the highest standard of living in the world. [452] The Royal Navy enforced a naval blockade during the war to financially cripple the colonies, however, this proved unsuccessful; 90% of the population worked in farming, not in coastal trade, and, as such, the American economy proved resilient enough to withstand the blockade. [453]

Congress had immense difficulties throughout the conflict to efficiently finance the war effort. [454] As the circulation of hard currency declined, the Americans had to rely on loans from American merchants and bankers, France, Spain and the Netherlands, saddling the young nation with crippling debts. Congress attempted to remedy this by printing vast amounts of paper money and bills of credit to raise revenue. The effect was disastrous; inflation skyrocketed, and the paper money became virtually worthless. The inflation spawned a popular phrase that anything of little value was "not worth a continental". [455]

By 1791, the United States had accumulated a national debt of approximately $75.5 million. [456] The United States finally solved its debt and currency problems in the 1790s, when Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton secured legislation by which the national government assumed all of the state debts, and, in addition, created a national bank and a funding system based on tariffs and bond issues that paid off the foreign debts. [457]

Britain spent around £80 million and ended with a national debt of £250 million, (£27.1 billion in today's money), generating a yearly interest of £9.5 million annually. The debts piled upon that which it had already accumulated from the Seven Years' War. [458] Due to wartime taxation upon the British populace, the tax for the average Briton amounted to approximately four shilling in every pound, or 20 percent. [459]

The French spent approximately 1.3 billion livres equivalent to 100 million pounds sterling (13.33 livres to the pound) on aiding the Americans, [460] accumulating a national debt of 3.315.1 billion livres by 1783 on war costs. [461] Unlike Britain, which had a very efficient taxation system, [462] while the French tax system was grossly inefficient which eventually leading to a financial crisis in 1786. [463] The debts contributed to a worsening fiscal crisis that ultimately begat the French Revolution at the end of the century. [464] The debt continued to spiral; on the eve of the French Revolution, the national debt had skyrocketed to 12 billion livres. [465]

Spain had nearly doubled her military spending during the war, from 454 million reales in 1778 to over 700 million in 1779. [466] Spain more easily disposed of her debts unlike her French ally, partially due to the massive increase in silver mining in her American colonies; production increased approximately 600% in Mexico, and by 250% in Peru and Bolivia. [467]

Analysis of combatants

Great Britain

British redcoats at the Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775 Battle of bunker hill by percy moran.jpg
British redcoats at the Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775

The population of Great Britain and Ireland in 1780 was approximately 12.6 million, [468] while the Thirteen Colonies held a population of some 2.8 million, including some 500,000 slaves. [469] Theoretically, Britain had the advantage, however, many factors inhibited the procurement of a large army.

Armed forces


In 1775, the standing British Army, exclusive of militia, comprised 45,123 men worldwide, made up of 38,254 infantry and 6,869 cavalry. The Army had approximately eighteen regiments of foot, some 8,500 men, stationed in North America. [470] Standing armies had played a key role in the purge of the Long Parliament in 1648, [471] the maintenance of a military dictatorship under Oliver Cromwell, [472] and the overthrow of James II, [473] and, as such, the Army had been deliberately kept small in peacetime to prevent abuses of power by the King. [129] [474] Despite this, eighteenth century armies were not easy guests, and were regarded with scorn and contempt by the press and public of the New and Old World alike, derided as enemies of liberty. An expression ran in the Navy; "A messmate before a shipmate, a shipmate before a stranger, a stranger before a dog, a dog before a soldier". [475]

Press gang at work, British caricature of 1780 Caricature-1780-press gang.jpg
Press gang at work, British caricature of 1780

Parliament suffered chronic difficulties in obtaining sufficient manpower, [476] and found it impossible to fill the quotas they had set. [477] The Army was a deeply unpopular profession, one contentious issue being pay. A Private infantryman was paid a wage of just 8d. per day, [478] the same pay as for a New Model Army infantryman, 130 years earlier. [479] The rate of pay in the army was insufficient to meet the rising costs of living, turning off potential recruits, [480] as service was nominally for life. [481]

To entice people to enrol, Parliament offered a bounty of £1.10s for every recruit. [482] As the war dragged on, Parliament became desperate for manpower; criminals were offered military service to escape legal penalties, and deserters were pardoned if they re-joined their units. [483] After the defeat at Saratoga, Parliament doubled the bounty to £3, [484] and increased it again the following year, to £3.3s, as well as expanding the age limit from 17–45 to 16–50 years of age. [485]

Impressment, essentially conscription by the "press gang", was a favored recruiting method, though it was unpopular with the public, leading many to enlist in local militias to avoid regular service. [486] Attempts were made to draft such levies, much to the chagrin of the militia commanders. [487] Competition between naval and army press gangs, and even between rival ships or regiments, frequently resulted in brawls between the gangs in order to secure recruits for their unit. [488] Men would maim themselves to avoid the press gangs, [489] while many deserted at the first opportunity. [490] Pressed men were militarily unreliable; regiments with large numbers of such men were deployed to garrisons such as Gibraltar or the West Indies, purely to increase the difficulty in successfully deserting. [491]

By 1781, the Army numbered approximately 121,000 men globally, [22] 48,000 of whom were stationed throughout the Americas. [21] Of the 171,000 sailors [26] who served in the Royal Navy throughout the conflict, around a quarter were pressed. This same proportion, approximately 42,000 men, deserted during the conflict. [41] At its height, the Navy had 94 ships-of-the-line, [492] 104 frigates [493] and 37 sloops [494] in service.

Loyalists and Hessians
Hessian soldiers of the Leibregiment Hessian jager.jpg
Hessian soldiers of the Leibregiment

In 1775, Britain unsuccessfully attempted to secure 20,000 mercenaries from Russia, [495] and the use of the Scots Brigade from the Dutch Republic, [496] such was the shortage of manpower. Parliament managed to negotiate treaties with the princes of German states for large sums of money, in exchange for auxiliary troops. [130] In total, 29,875 troops were hired for British service from six German states; Brunswick (5,723), Hesse-Kassel (16,992), Hesse-Hannau (2,422), Ansbach-Bayreuth (2,353), Waldeck-Pyrmont (1,225) and Anhalt-Zerbst (1,160). [29] King George III, who also ruled Hanover as a Prince-elector of the Holy Roman Empire, was approached by Parliament to lend the government Hanoverian soldiers for service in the war. Hanover supplied 2,365 men in five battalions, however, the lease agreement permitted them to only be used in Europe. [497]

Without any major allies, [230] the manpower shortage became critical when France and Spain entered the war, forcing a major diversion of military resources from the Americas. [233] [234] Recruiting adequate numbers of Loyalist militia in America proved difficult due to high Patriot activity. [498] To bolster numbers, the British promised freedom and grants of land to slaves who fought for them. [499] Approximately 25,000 Loyalists fought for the British throughout the war, [27] and provided some of the best troops in the British service; [500] the British Legion, a mixed regiment of 250 dragoons and 200 infantry [501] commanded by Banastre Tarleton, gained a fearsome reputation in the colonies, especially in the South. [502] [503] [504]


Britain had a difficult time appointing a determined senior military leadership in America. Thomas Gage, Commander-in-Chief of North America at the outbreak of the war, was criticized for being too lenient on the rebellious colonists. Jeffrey Amherst, who was appointed Commander-in-Chief of the Forces in 1778, refused a direct command in America, due to unwillingness to take sides in the war. [505] Admiral Augustus Keppel similarly opposed a command, stating; "I cannot draw the sword in such a cause". The Earl of Effingham resigned his commission when his regiment was posted to America, while William Howe and John Burgoyne were opposed to military solutions to the crisis. Howe and Henry Clinton both stated they were unwilling participants, and were only following orders. [506]

As was the case in many European armies, except the Prussian Army, officers in British service could purchase commissions to ascend the ranks. [507] Despite repeated attempts by Parliament to suppress it, the practise was common in the Army. [508] Values of commissions varied, but were usually in line with social and military prestige, for example, regiments such as the Guards commanded the highest prices. [509] The lower ranks often regarded the treatment to high-ranking commissions by wealthier officers as "plums for [their] consumption". [510] Wealthy individuals lacking any formal military education, or practical experience, often found their way into positions of high responsibility, diluting the effectiveness of a regiment. [511] Though Royal authority had forbade the practise since 1711, it was still permitted for infants to hold commissions. Young boys, often orphans of deceased wealthy officers, were taken from their schooling and placed in positions of responsibility within regiments. [512]

Grenadier of the 40th Regiment of Foot in 1767, armed with a Brown Bess musket Grenadier, 40th Foot, 1767.jpg
Grenadier of the 40th Regiment of Foot in 1767, armed with a Brown Bess musket

Logistical organization of eighteenth century armies was chaotic at best, and the British Army was no exception. No logistical corps existed in the modern sense; while on campaign in foreign territories such as America, horses, wagons, and drivers were frequently requisitioned from the locals, often by impressment or by hire. [513] No centrally organized medical corps existed. It was common for surgeons to have no formal medical education, and no diploma or entry examination was required. Nurses sometimes were apprentices to surgeons, but many were drafted from the women who followed the army. [514] Army surgeons and doctors were poorly paid and were regarded as social inferiors to other officers. [515]

The heavy personal equipment and wool uniform of the regular infantrymen were wholly unsuitable for combat in America, and the outfit was especially ill-suited to comfort and agile movement. [516] During the Battle of Monmouth in late June 1778, the temperature exceeded 100°F (37.8°C) and is said to have claimed more lives through heat stroke than through actual combat. [517] The standard-issue firearm of the British Army was the Land Pattern Musket. Some officers preferred their troops to fire careful, measured shots (around two per minute), rather than rapid firing. A bayonet made firing difficult, as its cumbersome shape hampered ramming down the charge into the barrel. [518] British troops had a tendency to fire impetuously, resulting in inaccurate fire, a trait for which John Burgoyne criticized them during the Saratoga campaign. Burgoyne instead encouraged bayonet charges to break up enemy formations, which was a preferred tactic in most European armies at the time. [519]

Soldiers of the Black Watch armed with Brown Bess muskets, c. 1790 Officer and Serjeant of a Highland Regiment.jpg
Soldiers of the Black Watch armed with Brown Bess muskets, c. 1790

Every battalion in America had organized its own rifle company by the end of the war, although rifles were not formally issued to the army until the Baker Rifle in 1801. [520] Flintlocks were heavily dependent on the weather; high winds could blow the gunpowder from the flash pan, [521] while heavy rain could soak the paper cartridge, ruining the powder and rendering the musket unable to fire. Furthermore, flints used in British muskets were of notoriously poor quality; they could only be fired around six times before requiring resharpening, while American flints could fire sixty. This led to a common expression among the British: "Yankee flint was as good as a glass of grog". [522]

Provisioning troops and sailors proved to be an immense challenge, as the majority of food stores had to be shipped overseas from Britain. [523] The need to maintain Loyalist support prevented the Army from living off the land. [524] Other factors also impeded this option; the countryside was too sparsely populated and the inhabitants were largely hostile or indifferent, the network of roads and bridges was poorly developed, and the area which the British controlled was so limited that foraging parties were frequently in danger of being ambushed. [525] After France entered the war, the threat of the French navy increased the difficulty of transporting supplies to America. Food supplies were frequently in bad condition. The climate was also against the British in the southern colonies and the Caribbean, where the intense summer heat caused food supplies to sour and spoil. [526]

Life at sea was little better. Sailors and passengers were issued a daily food ration, largely consisting of hardtack and beer. [527] The hardtack was often infested by weevils and was so tough that it earned the nicknames "molar breakers" and "worm castles", [528] and it sometimes had to be broken up with cannon shot. Meat supplies often spoiled on long voyages. [529] The lack of fresh fruit and vegetables gave rise to scurvy, one of the biggest killers at sea. [446]


Discipline was harsh in the armed forces, and the lash was used to punish even trivial offences—and not used sparingly. [530] For instance, two redcoats received 1,000 lashes each for robbery during the Saratoga campaign, [531] while another received 800 lashes for striking a superior officer. [532] Flogging was a common punishment in the Royal Navy and came to be associated with the stereotypical hardiness of sailors. [533]

Despite the harsh discipline, a distinct lack of self-discipline pervaded all ranks of the British forces. Soldiers had an intense passion for gambling, reaching such excesses that troops would often wager their own uniforms. [534] Many drank heavily, and this was not exclusive to the lower ranks; William Howe was said to have seen many "crapulous mornings" while campaigning in New York. John Burgoyne drank heavily on a nightly basis towards the end of the Saratoga campaign. The two generals were also reported to have found solace with the wives of subordinate officers to ease the stressful burdens of command. [535] During the Philadelphia campaign, British officers deeply offended local Quakers by entertaining their mistresses in the houses where they had been quartered. [536] Some reports indicated that British troops were generally scrupulous in their treatment of non-combatants. [537] This is in contrast to diaries of Hessian soldiers, who recorded their disapproval of British conduct towards the colonists, such as the destruction of property and the execution of prisoners. [538]

The presence of Hessian soldiers caused considerable anxiety among the colonists, both Patriot and Loyalist, who viewed them as brutal mercenaries. [539] British soldiers were often contemptuous in their treatment of Hessian troops, despite orders from General Howe that "the English should treat the Germans as brothers". The order only began to have any real effect when the Hessians learned to speak a minimal degree of English, which was seen as a prerequisite for the British troops to accord them any respect. [540]

During peacetime, the Army's idleness led to it being riddled with corruption and inefficiency, resulting in many administrative difficulties once campaigning began. [541]

Strategic deficiencies

The British leadership soon discovered it had overestimated the capabilities of its own troops, while underestimating those of the colonists, causing a sudden re-think in British planning. [126] [127] The ineffective initial response of British military and civil officials to the onset of the rebellion had allowed the advantage to shift to the colonists, as British authorities rapidly lost control over every colony. [128] A microcosm of these shortcomings were evident at the Battle of Bunker Hill. It took ten hours for the British leadership to respond following the sighting of the Americans on the Charlestown Peninsula, giving the colonists ample time to reinforce their defenses. [542] Rather than opt for a simple flanking attack that would have rapidly succeeded with minimal loss, [543] the British decided on repeated frontal attacks. The results were telling; the British suffered 1,054 casualties of a force of around 3,000 after repeated frontal assaults. [544] The British leadership had nevertheless remained excessively optimistic, believing that just two regiments could suppress the rebellion in Massachusetts. [545] [546]

Debate persists over whether a British defeat was a guaranteed outcome. Ferling argues that the odds were so long, the defeat of Britain was nothing short of a miracle. [547] Ellis, however, considers that the odds always favored the Americans, and questions whether a British victory by any margin was realistic. Ellis argues that the British squandered their only opportunities for a decisive success in 1777, and that the strategic decisions undertaken by William Howe underestimated the challenges posed by the Americans. Ellis concludes that, once Howe failed, the opportunity for a British victory "would never come again". [548] Conversely, the United States Army's official textbook argues that, had Britain been able to commit 10,000 fresh troops to the war in 1780, a British victory was within the realms of possibility. [549]

William Howe
A 1777 mezzotint of Sir William Howe, British Commander-in-Chief from 1775-1778 WilliamHowe1777ColorMezzotint.jpeg
A 1777 mezzotint of Sir William Howe, British Commander-in-Chief from 1775–1778

Historians such as Ellis and Stewart have observed that, under William Howe's command, the British squandered several opportunities to achieve a decisive victory over the Americans. [549] [548] Throughout the New York and Philadelphia campaigns, Howe made several strategic errors, errors which cost the British opportunities for a complete victory. At Long Island, Howe failed to even attempt an encirclement of Washington, [550] and actively restrained his subordinates from mounting an aggressive pursuit of the defeated American army. [147] At White Plains, he refused to engage Washington's vulnerable army, and instead concentrated his efforts upon a hill which offered the British no strategic advantage. [152] [153] After securing control of New York, Howe dispatched Henry Clinton to capture Newport, a measure which Clinton was opposed to, on the grounds the troops assigned to his command could have been put to better use in pursuing Washington's retreating army. [156] [157] [158] Despite the bleak outlook for the revolutionary cause [551] and the surge of Loyalist activity in the wake of Washington's defeats, [141] Howe made no attempt to mount an attack upon Washington while the Americans settled down into winter quarters, much to their surprise. [179]

During planning for the Saratoga campaign, Howe was left with the choice of committing his army to support Burgoyne, or capture Philadelphia, the revolutionary capital. Howe decided upon the latter, determining that Washington was of a greater threat. When Howe launched his campaign, he took his army upon a time-consuming route through the Chesapeake Bay, rather than the more sensible choices of overland through New Jersey, or by sea through the Delaware Bay. The move left him unable to assist Burgoyne even if it was required of him. The decision so angered Parliament, that Howe was accused by Tories on both sides of the Atlantic of treason. [190]

During the Philadelphia campaign, Howe failed to pursue and destroy the defeated Americans on two occasions; once after the Battle of Brandywine, [191] [192] and again after the Battle of Germantown. [195] At the Battle of White Marsh, Howe failed to even attempt to exploit the vulnerable American rear, [197] and then inexplicably ordered a retreat to Philadelphia after only minor skirmishes, astonishing both sides. [196] While the Americans wintered only twenty miles away, Howe made no effort to attack their camp, which critics argue could have ended the war. [199] [200] [201] Following the conclusion of the campaign, Howe resigned his commission, and was replaced by Henry Clinton on May 24, 1778. [203]

Contrary to Howe's more hostile critics, however, there were strategic factors at play which impeded aggressive action. Howe may have been dissuaded from pursuing aggressive manoeuvres due to the memory of the grievous losses the British suffered at Bunker Hill. [552] [553] During the major campaigns in New York and Philadelphia, Howe often wrote of the scarcity of adequate provisions, which hampered his ability to mount effective campaigns. [554] Howe's tardiness in launching the New York campaign, and his reluctance to allow Cornwallis to vigorously pursue Washington's beaten army, have both been attributed to the paucity of available food supplies. [555] [556]

During the winter of 1776–1777, Howe split his army into scattered cantonments. This decision dangerously exposed the individual forces to defeat in detail, as the distance between them was such that they could not mutually support each other. This strategic failure allowed the Americans to achieve victory at the Battle of Trenton, and the concurrent Battle of Princeton. [557] While a major strategic error to divide an army in such a manner, the quantity of available food supplies in New York was so low that Howe had been compelled to take such a decision. The garrisons were widely spaced so their respective foraging parties would not interfere with each other's efforts. [558] Howe's difficulties during the Philadelphia campaign were also greatly exacerbated by the poor quality and quantity of available provisions. [559]

Clinton and Cornwallis
General Charles Cornwallis led British forces in the southern campaign. First Marquis of Cornwallis.jpg
General Charles Cornwallis led British forces in the southern campaign.

In 1780, the primary British strategy hinged upon a Loyalist uprising in the south, for which Charles Cornwallis was chiefly responsible. After an encouraging success at Camden, Cornwallis was poised to invade North Carolina. However, any significant Loyalist support had been effectively destroyed at the Battle of Kings Mountain, and the British Legion, the cream of his army, had been decisively defeated at the Battle of Cowpens. Following both defeats, Cornwallis was fiercely criticized for detaching a significant portion of his army without adequate mutual support. [323] Despite the defeats, Cornwallis chose to proceed into North Carolina, gambling his success upon a large Loyalist uprising which never materialized. [560] As a result, subsequent engagements cost Cornwallis valuable troops he could not replace, as at the Battle of Guilford Courthouse, [325] and the Americans steadily wore his army down in an exhaustive war of attrition. Cornwallis had thus left the Carolinas ripe for reconquest. The Americans had largely achieved this aim by the end of 1781, effectively confining the British to the coast, and undoing all the progress they had made in the previous year. [561] [332]

In a last-ditch attempt to win the war in the South, Cornwallis resolved to invade Virginia, in order to cut off the American's supply base to the Carolinas. Henry Clinton, Cornwallis' superior, strongly opposed the plan, believing the decisive confrontations would take place with Washington in the North. [333] London had approved Cornwallis plan, however they had failed to include Clinton in the decision-making, despite his seniority over Cornwallis, leading to a muddled strategic direction. [334] Cornwallis then decided to invade Virginia without informing Clinton of his intentions. [562] Clinton, however, had wholly failed to construct a coherent strategy for British campaigning that year, [336] owing to his fractious relationship that he shared with Mariot Arbuthnot, his naval counterpart. [337]

As the Franco-American army approached Cornwallis at Yorktown, he made no attempt to sally out and engage before siege lines could be erected, despite the repeated urging of his subordinate officers. [347] Expecting relief to soon arrive from Clinton, Cornwallis prematurely abandoned all of his outer defences, which were then promptly occupied by the besiegers, serving to hasten the British defeat. [563] These factors contributed to the eventual surrender of Cornwallis' entire army, and the end of major operations in North America. [564]

Like Howe before him, Clinton's efforts to campaign suffered from chronic supply issues. In 1778, Clinton wrote to Germain complaining of the lack of supplies, even after the arrival of a convoy from Ireland. [565] That winter, the supply issue had deteriorated so badly, that Clinton expressed considerable anxiety over how the troops were going to be properly fed. [566] Clinton was largely inactive in the North throughout 1779, launching few major campaigns. This inactivity was partially due to the shortage of food. [567] By 1780, the situation had not improved. Clinton wrote a frustrated correspondence to Germain, voicing concern that a "fatal consequence will ensue" if matters did not improve. By October that year, Clinton again wrote to Germain, angered that the troops in New York had not received "an ounce" of that year's allotted stores from Britain. [568]

Campaign issues

Suppressing a rebellion in America presented the British with major problems. The key issue was distance; it could take up to three months to cross the Atlantic, and orders from London were often outdated by the time that they arrived. [569] The colonies had never been formally united prior to the conflict and there was no centralized area of ultimate strategic importance. Traditionally, the fall of a capital city often signalled the end of a conflict, [570] yet the war continued unabated even after the fall of major settlements such as New York, Philadelphia (which was the Patriot capital), and Charleston. [571] Britain's ability to project its power overseas lay chiefly in the power of the Royal Navy, allowing her to control major coastal settlements with relative ease and enforce a strong blockade of colonial ports. However, the overwhelming majority of the American population was agrarian, not urban. As a result, the American economy proved resilient enough to withstand the blockade's effects. [453]

Black Loyalist soldiers fought alongside British regulars in the 1781 Battle of Jersey, from The Death of Major Peirson. John Singleton Copley 001.jpg
Black Loyalist soldiers fought alongside British regulars in the 1781 Battle of Jersey, from The Death of Major Peirson .

The need to maintain Loyalist support prevented the British from using the harsh methods of suppressing revolts that they had used in Scotland and Ireland. [572] For example, British troops looted and pillaged the locals during an aborted attack on Charleston in 1779, enraging both Patriots and Loyalists. [573] Neutral colonists were often driven into the ranks of the Patriots when brutal combat broke out between Tories and Whigs across the Carolinas in the later stages of the war. [574] Conversely, Loyalists were often emboldened when Patriots resorted to intimidating suspected Tories, such as destroying property or tarring and feathering. [575] [576] The vastness of the American countryside and the limited manpower available meant that the British could never simultaneously defeat the Americans and occupy captured territory. One British statesman described the attempt as "like trying to conquer a map". [577]

Wealthy Loyalists wielded great influence in London [578] and were successful in convincing the British that the majority view in the colonies was sympathetic toward the Crown. Consequently, British planners pinned the success of their strategies on popular uprisings of Loyalists. Historians have estimated that Loyalists made up only 15–20% of the population (vs. 40–45% Patriots) [579] and that they continued to deceive themselves on their level of support as late as 1780. [580] The British discovered that any significant level of organized Loyalist activity would require the continued presence of British regulars, [581] which presented them with a major dilemma. The manpower that the British had available was insufficient to both protect Loyalist territory and counter American advances. [582] The vulnerability of Loyalist militias was repeatedly demonstrated in the South, where they suffered strings of defeats to their Patriot neighbors. The most crucial juncture of this was at Kings Mountain, and the victory of the Patriot partisans irreversibly crippled Loyalist military capability in the South. [321]

Upon the entry of France and Spain into the conflict, the British were forced to severely limit the number of troops and warships that they sent to North America in order to defend other key territories and the British mainland. [233] [234] As a result, King George III abandoned any hope of subduing America militarily while he had a European war to contend with. [583] The small size of Britain's army left them unable to concentrate their resources primarily in one theater as they had done in the Seven Years' War, leaving them at a critical disadvantage. [231] The British were compelled to disperse troops from the Americas to Europe and the East Indies, and these forces were unable to assist one other as a result, precariously exposing them to defeat. [236] In North America, the immediate strategic focus of the French, Spanish, and British shifted to Jamaica, [584] whose sugar exports were more valuable to the British than the economy of the Thirteen Colonies combined. [389]

Following the end of the war, Britain had lost some of her most populous colonies. However, the economic effects of the loss were negligible in the long-term, and she became a global superpower just 32 years after the end of the conflict. [585]

United States

1st Maryland Regiment holding the line at the Battle of Guilford Battle of Guiliford Courthouse 15 March 1781.jpg
1st Maryland Regiment holding the line at the Battle of Guilford

The Americans began the war with significant disadvantages compared to the British. They had no national government, no national army or navy, no financial system, no banks, no established credit, and no functioning government departments, such as a treasury. The Congress tried to handle administrative affairs through legislative committees, which proved inefficient. The state governments were themselves brand new and officials had no administrative experience. In peacetime the colonies relied heavily on ocean travel and shipping, but that was now shut down by the British blockade and the Americans had to rely on slow overland travel.

However, the Americans had multiple advantages that in the long run outweighed the initial disadvantages they faced. The Americans had a large prosperous population that depended not on imports but on local production for food and most supplies, while the British were mostly shipped in from across the ocean. The British faced a vast territory far larger than Britain or France, located at a far distance from home ports. Most of the Americans lived on farms distant from the seaports—the British could capture any port but that did not give them control over the hinterland. They were on their home ground, had a smoothly functioning, well organized system of local and state governments, newspapers and printers, and internal lines of communications. They had a long-established system of local militia, previously used to combat the French and Native Americans, with companies and an officer corps that could form the basis of local militias, and provide a training ground for the national army created by Congress. [586]

Motivation was a major asset. The Patriots wanted to win; over 200,000 fought in the war; 25,000 died. The British expected the Loyalists to do much of the fighting, but they did much less than expected. The British also hired German mercenaries to do much of their fighting. [13]

At the onset of the war, the Americans had no major international allies. Battles such as the Battle of Bennington, the Battles of Saratoga and even defeats such as the Battle of Germantown [587] proved decisive in gaining the attention and support of powerful European nations such as France and Spain, who moved from covertly supplying the Americans with weapons and supplies, to overtly supporting them militarily, moving the war to a global stage. [588] [589]

The new Continental Army suffered significantly from a lack of an effective training regime, and largely inexperienced officers and sergeants. The inexperience of its officers was compensated for in part by a few senior officers. The Americans solved their training dilemma during their stint in Winter Quarters at Valley Forge, where they were relentlessly drilled and trained by General Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben, a veteran of the famed Prussian General Staff. He taught the Continental Army the essentials of military discipline, drills, tactics and strategy, and wrote the Revolutionary War Drill Manual. [590] When the Army emerged from Valley Forge, it proved its ability to equally match the British troops in battle when they fought a successful strategic action at the Battle of Monmouth. [591]

Population density in the American Colonies in 1775 Population Density in the American Colonies 1775.gif
Population density in the American Colonies in 1775

When the war began, the 13 colonies lacked a professional army or navy. Each colony sponsored local militia. Militiamen were lightly armed, had little training, and usually did not have uniforms. Their units served for only a few weeks or months at a time, were reluctant to travel far from home and thus were unavailable for extended operations, and lacked the training and discipline of soldiers with more experience. If properly used, however, their numbers could help the Continental armies overwhelm smaller British forces, as at the battles of Concord, Bennington and Saratoga, and the siege of Boston. Both sides used partisan warfare but the Americans effectively suppressed Loyalist activity when British regulars were not in the area. [498]

Seeking to coordinate military efforts, the Continental Congress established a regular army on June 14, 1775, and appointed George Washington as commander-in-chief. The development of the Continental Army was always a work in progress, and Washington used both his regulars and state militia throughout the war.

Three current branches of the United States Military trace their institutional roots to the American Revolutionary War; the United States Army comes from the Continental Army, formed by a resolution of the Continental Congress on June 14, 1775. The United States Navy recognizes October 13, 1775 as the date of its official establishment, the passage of the resolution of the Continental Congress at Philadelphia that created the Continental Navy. [592] The United States Marine Corps links to the Continental Marines of the war, formed by a resolution of the Continental Congress on November 10, 1775. However, in 1783 both the Continental Navy and Continental Marines were disbanded.

Intelligence and espionage

Soldiers and sailors

At the beginning of 1776, Washington commanded 20,000 men, with two-thirds enlisted in the Continental Army and the other third in the various state militias. [593] About 250,000 men served as regulars or as militiamen for the Revolutionary cause in the eight years of the war, but there were never more than 90,000 men under arms at one time.

About 55,000 sailors served aboard American privateers during the war. [594] They used 1,700 ships, and they captured 2,283 enemy ships. [450] John Paul Jones became the first great American naval hero, capturing HMS Drake on April 24, 1778, the first victory for any American military vessel in British waters. [595]

Armies were small by European standards of the era, largely attributable, on the American side, to limitations such as lack of powder and other logistical capabilities; and, on the British side, to the difficulty of transporting troops across the Atlantic, as well as the dependence on local supplies, which the Patriots tried to cut off. The largest force Washington commanded was certainly under 17,000, [596] and may have been no more than 13,000 troops, and even the combined American and French forces at the siege of Yorktown amounted to only about 19,000. [597] By comparison, Duffy notes that in an era when European rulers were generally revising their forces downward, in favor of a size that could be most effectively controlled (the very different perspective of mass conscript armies came later, during the French Revolutionary and then the Napoleonic Wars), the largest army that Frederick the Great ever led into battle was 65,000 men (at Prague in 1757), and at other times he commanded between 23,000 and 50,000 men, considering the latter the most effective number. [597]

George Washington's roles

General Washington assumed five main roles during the war. [598]

First, he designed the overall strategy of the war, in cooperation with Congress. The goal was always independence. When France entered the war, he worked closely with the soldiers it sent – they were decisive in the great victory at Yorktown in 1781. [599]

Second, he provided leadership of troops against the main British forces in 1775–77 and again in 1781. He lost many of his battles, but he never surrendered his army during the war, and he continued to fight the British relentlessly until the war's end. Washington worked hard to develop a successful espionage system to detect British locations and plans. In 1778, he formed the Culper Ring to spy on enemy movements in New York City. In 1780 it discovered Benedict Arnold was a traitor. [600] The British put a low value on intelligence, and its operations were of poor quality until 1780, when it finally inserted some spies with Congress and with Washington's command. Even then, however, British commanders ignored or downplayed threats that were revealed. The most serious intelligence failure came in 1781 when top commanders were unaware that The American and French armies at both left the Northeast and marched down to Yorktown, where they outnumbered Cornwallis by more than 2 to 1. [601]

Third, he was charged selecting and guiding the generals. In June 1776, Congress made its first attempt at running the war effort with the committee known as "Board of War and Ordnance", succeeded by the Board of War in July 1777, a committee which eventually included members of the military. [602] [603] The command structure of the armed forces was a hodgepodge of Congressional appointees (and Congress sometimes made those appointments without Washington's input) with state-appointments filling the lower ranks. The results of his general staff were mixed, as some of his favorites never mastered the art of command, such as John Sullivan. Eventually, he found capable officers such as Nathanael Greene, Daniel Morgan, Henry Knox (chief of artillery), and Alexander Hamilton (chief of staff). The American officers never equaled their opponents in tactics and maneuver, and they lost most of the pitched battles. The great successes at Boston (1776), Saratoga (1777), and Yorktown (1781) came from trapping the British far from base with much larger numbers of troops. [604]

Fourth he took charge of training the army and providing supplies, from food to gunpowder to tents. He recruited regulars and assigned Baron Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben, a veteran of the Prussian general staff, to train them. He transformed Washington's army into a disciplined and effective force. [605] The war effort and getting supplies to the troops were under the purview of Congress, but Washington pressured the Congress to provide the essentials. There was never nearly enough. [606]

Washington's fifth and most important role in the war effort was the embodiment of armed resistance to the Crown, serving as the representative man of the Revolution. His long-term strategy was to maintain an army in the field at all times, and eventually this strategy worked. His enormous personal and political stature and his political skills kept Congress, the army, the French, the militias, and the states all pointed toward a common goal. Furthermore, he permanently established the principle of civilian supremacy in military affairs by voluntarily resigning his commission and disbanding his army when the war was won, rather than declaring himself monarch. He also helped to overcome the distrust of a standing army by his constant reiteration that well-disciplined professional soldiers counted for twice as much as poorly trained and led militias. [607]

African Americans

1780 drawing of American soldiers from the Yorktown campaign shows a black infantryman from the 1st Rhode Island Regiment. Soldiers at the siege of Yorktown (1781), by Jean-Baptiste-Antoine DeVerger.png
1780 drawing of American soldiers from the Yorktown campaign shows a black infantryman from the 1st Rhode Island Regiment.

African Americans—slave and free—served on both sides during the war. The British recruited slaves belonging to Patriot masters and promised freedom to those who served by act of Lord Dunmore's Proclamation. Because of manpower shortages, George Washington lifted the ban on black enlistment in the Continental Army in January 1776. Small all-black units were formed in Rhode Island and Massachusetts; many slaves were promised freedom for serving. Some of the men promised freedom were sent back to their masters, after the war was over, out of political convenience. Another all-black unit came from Saint-Domingue with French colonial forces. At least 5,000 black soldiers fought for the Revolutionary cause. [608] [609]

Tens of thousands of slaves escaped during the war and joined British lines; others simply moved off in the chaos. For instance, in South Carolina, nearly 25,000 slaves (30% of the enslaved population) fled, migrated or died during the disruption of the war. [610] This greatly disrupted plantation production during and after the war. When they withdrew their forces from Savannah and Charleston, the British also evacuated 10,000 slaves belonging to Loyalists. [611] Altogether, the British evacuated nearly 20,000 blacks at the end of the war. More than 3,000 of them were freedmen and most of these were resettled in Nova Scotia; other blacks were sold in the West Indies. [612] [613]

American Indians

A watercolor painting depicting a variety of Continental Army soldiers ContinentalArmy LeffertsWatercolor.jpg
A watercolor painting depicting a variety of Continental Army soldiers

Most American Indians east of the Mississippi River were affected by the war, and many tribes were divided over the question of how to respond to the conflict. A few tribes were on friendly terms with the other Americans, but most Indians opposed the union of the Colonies as a potential threat to their territory. Approximately 13,000 Indians fought on the British side, with the largest group coming from the Iroquois tribes, who fielded around 1,500 men. [614] The powerful Iroquois Confederacy was shattered as a result of the conflict, whatever side they took; the Seneca, Onondaga, and Cayuga tribes sided with the British. Members of the Mohawks fought on both sides. Many Tuscarora and Oneida sided with the Americans. The Continental Army sent the Sullivan Expedition on raids throughout New York to cripple the Iroquois tribes that had sided with the British. Mohawk leaders Joseph Louis Cook and Joseph Brant sided with the Americans and the British respectively, and this further exacerbated the split.

Farther west, conflicts between settlers and Indians led to lasting distrust. [615] In the Treaty of Paris, Great Britain ceded control of the disputed lands between the Great Lakes and the Ohio River, but the Indian inhabitants were not a part of the peace negotiations. [616] Tribes in the Northwest Territory banded together and allied with the British to resist American settlement; their conflict continued after the Revolutionary War as the Northwest Indian War. [617] [618]

Early in July 1776, Cherokee allies of Britain attacked the western frontier areas of North Carolina. Their defeat resulted in a splintering of the Cherokee settlements and people and was directly responsible for the rise of the Chickamauga Cherokee, bitter enemies of the American settlers who carried on a frontier war for decades following the end of hostilities with Britain. [619] Creek and Seminole allies of Britain fought against Americans in Georgia and South Carolina. In 1778, a force of 800 Creeks destroyed American settlements along the Broad River in Georgia. Creek warriors also joined Thomas Brown's raids into South Carolina and assisted Britain during the Siege of Savannah. [620] Many Indians were involved in the fighting between Britain and Spain on the Gulf Coast and up the Mississippi River, mostly on the British side. Thousands of Creeks, Chickasaws, and Choctaws fought in major battles such as the Battle of Fort Charlotte, the Battle of Mobile, and the Siege of Pensacola. [621]


Nancy Morgan Hart captures six British soldiers who had entered her home Nancy Morgan Hart.gif
Nancy Morgan Hart captures six British soldiers who had entered her home

A few women fought in the American Army in the war while disguised as men. [622] Deborah Sampson fought until her sex was discovered and she was discharged, and Sally St. Clare died in the war. [622] [623] Anna Maria Lane joined her husband in the Army, and she was wearing men's clothes by the time of the Battle of Germantown. [622] According to the Virginia General Assembly, Lane "performed extraordinary military services, and received a severe wound at the battle of Germantown", fighting dressed as a man and "with the courage of a soldier". [622]

Women also accompanied armies as camp followers, selling goods and performing necessary services. They were an official and necessary part of 18th century armies, and they numbered in the thousands during the Revolutionary War. [624] Some women accompanied their husbands when permitted. Martha Washington was known to visit the American camp, for example, and Frederika Charlotte Riedesel documented the Saratoga campaign. [625] Women also acted as spies on both sides of the Revolutionary War. [626]

Race and class

Pybus (2005) estimates that about 20,000 slaves defected to or were captured by the British, of whom about 8,000 died from disease or wounds or were recaptured by the Patriots. The British took some 12,000 at the end of the war; of these 8000 remained in slavery. Including those who left during the war, a total of about 8000 to 10,000 slaves gained freedom. [613] About 4000 freed slaves went to Nova Scotia and 1200 blacks remained slaves. [627] [628]

Baller (2006) examines family dynamics and mobilization for the Revolution in central Massachusetts. He reports that warfare and the farming culture were sometimes incompatible. Militiamen found that living and working on the family farm had not prepared them for wartime marches and the rigors of camp life. Rugged individualism conflicted with military discipline and regimentation. A man's birth order often influenced his military recruitment, as younger sons went to war and older sons took charge of the farm. A person's family responsibilities and the prevalent patriarchy could impede mobilization. Harvesting duties and family emergencies pulled men home regardless of the sergeant's orders. Some relatives might be Loyalists, creating internal strains. On the whole, historians conclude the Revolution's effect on patriarchy and inheritance patterns favored egalitarianism. [629]

McDonnell (2006) shows a grave complication in Virginia's mobilization of troops was the conflicting interests of distinct social classes, which tended to undercut a unified commitment to the Patriot cause. The Assembly balanced the competing demands of elite slave-owning planters, the middling yeomen (some owning a few slaves), and landless indentured servants, among other groups. The Assembly used deferments, taxes, military service substitute, and conscription to resolve the tensions. Unresolved class conflict, however, made these laws less effective. There were violent protests, many cases of evasion, and large-scale desertion, so that Virginia's contributions came at embarrassingly low levels. With the British invasion of the state in 1781, Virginia was mired in class division as its native son, George Washington, made desperate appeals for troops. [630]

See also


  1. This article primarily refers to the inhabitants of the thirteen colonies who supported the American Revolution as "Americans", with occasional references to "Patriots" or "Revolutionaries". Colonists who supported the British and opposed the Revolution are referred to as "Loyalists" or "Tories". The geographical area of the thirteen colonies is often referred to simply as "America".

Related Research Articles

American Revolution Revolt in which the Thirteen Colonies won independence from Great Britain

The American Revolution was a colonial revolt which occurred between 1765 and 1783. The American Patriots in the Thirteen Colonies defeated the British in the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783) with the assistance of France, winning independence from Great Britain and establishing the United States of America.

Siege of Yorktown last major battle of the American Revolutionary War

The siege of Yorktown, also known as the Battle of Yorktown, the surrender at Yorktown, German Battle or the siege of Little York, ending on October 19, 1781, at Yorktown, Virginia, was a decisive victory by a combined force of American Continental Army troops led by General George Washington and French Army troops led by the Comte de Rochambeau over a British army commanded by British peer and Lieutenant General Charles Cornwallis. The culmination of the Yorktown campaign, the siege proved to be the last major land battle of the American Revolutionary War in the North American theater, as the surrender by Cornwallis, and the capture of both him and his army, prompted the British government to negotiate an end to the conflict. The battle boosted faltering American morale and revived French enthusiasm for the war, as well as undermining popular support for the conflict in Great Britain.

Henry Clinton (British Army officer, born 1730) British army officer and politician

General Sir Henry Clinton, KB was a British army officer and politician who sat in the House of Commons between 1772 and 1795. He is best known for his service as a general during the American War of Independence. First arriving in Boston in May 1775, from 1778 to 1782 he was the British Commander-in-Chief in North America. In addition to his military service, due to the influence of his cousin Henry Pelham-Clinton, 2nd Duke of Newcastle, he was a Member of Parliament for many years. Late in life he was named Governor of Gibraltar, but died before assuming the post.

History of the United States (1776–1789) aspect of history

Between 1776 and 1789, the United States of America emerged as an independent country, creating and ratifying its new constitution and establishing its national government. In order to assert their traditional rights, American Patriots seized control of the colonies and launched a war for independence. The Americans declared independence on July 4, 1776, proclaiming "all men are created equal". Congress raised the Continental Army under the command of General George Washington, forged a military alliance with France and defeated the two main British invasion armies. Nationalists replaced the governing Articles of Confederation to strengthen the federal government's powers of defense and taxation with the Constitution of the United States of America in 1789, still in effect today.

New York and New Jersey campaign

The New York and New Jersey campaign was a series of battles in 1776 and the winter months of 1777 for control of the Port of New York and the state of New Jersey during the American Revolutionary War between British forces under General Sir William Howe and the Continental Army under General George Washington. Howe was successful in driving Washington out of New York, but overextended his reach into New Jersey, and ended the active campaign season in January 1777 with only a few outposts near the city. The British held New York harbor for the rest of the war, using it as a base for expeditions against other targets.

Siege of Charleston major engagement fought between March 29 to May 12, 1780 during the American Revolutionary War

The siege of Charleston was a major engagement and major British victory, fought between March 29 to May 12, 1780, during the American Revolutionary War. The British, following the collapse of their northern strategy in late 1777 and their withdrawal from Philadelphia in 1778, shifted their focus to the American Southern Colonies.

Boston campaign opening campaign of the American Revolutionary War

The Boston campaign was the opening campaign of the American Revolutionary War, taking place primarily in the Province of Massachusetts Bay. The campaign began with the Battles of Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775, in which the local colonial militias interdicted a British government attempt to seize military stores and leaders in Concord, Massachusetts. The entire British expedition suffered significant casualties during a running battle back to Charlestown against an ever-growing number of militia.

South Carolina was outraged over British tax policies in the 1760s that violated what they saw as their constitutional right to "no taxation without representation". Merchants joined the boycott against buying British products. When the London government harshly punished Massachusetts for the Boston Tea Party, South Carolina's leaders joined 11 other colonies in forming the Continental Congress. When the British attacked Lexington and Concord in the spring of 1775 and were beaten back by the Massachusetts Patriots, South Carolina rallied to support the American Revolution. Loyalist and Patriots of the colony were split by nearly 50/50. Many of the South Carolinian battles fought during the American Revolution were with loyalist Carolinians and the part of the Cherokee tribe that allied with the British. This was to General Henry Clinton's advantage. His strategy was to march his troops north from St. Augustine, Florida, and sandwich George Washington in the North. Clinton alienated Loyalists and enraged Patriots by attacking a fleeing army of Patriot soldiers who posed no threat. Enslaved Africans and African Americans chose independence by escaping to British lines where they were promised freedom.

Yorktown campaign 1781 military campaign of the American Revolutionary War

The Yorktown or Virginia campaign was a series of military maneuvers and battles during the American Revolutionary War that culminated in the decisive Siege of Yorktown in October 1781. The result of the campaign was the surrender of the British Army force of General Charles Earl Cornwallis, an event that led directly to the beginning of serious peace negotiations and the eventual end of the war. The campaign was marked by disagreements, indecision, and miscommunication on the part of British leaders, and by a remarkable set of cooperative decisions, at times in violation of orders, by the French and Americans.

Philadelphia campaign

The Philadelphia campaign (1777–1778) was a British initiative in the American Revolutionary War to gain control of Philadelphia, which was then the seat of the Second Continental Congress. British General William Howe, after unsuccessfully attempting to draw the Continental Army under General George Washington into a battle in northern New Jersey, embarked his army on transports, and landed them at the northern end of Chesapeake Bay. From there, he advanced northward toward Philadelphia. Washington prepared defenses against Howe's movements at Brandywine Creek, but was flanked and beaten back in the Battle of Brandywine on September 11, 1777. After further skirmishes and maneuvers, Howe was able to enter and occupy Philadelphia. Washington then unsuccessfully attacked one of Howe's garrisons at Germantown before retreating to Valley Forge for the winter.

Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War The military conflicts in then-Southern United States during the American Revolution

The Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War was the central area of operations in North America in the second half of the American Revolutionary War. During the first three years of the conflict, the largest military encounters were in the north, focused on campaigns around the cities of Boston, New York, and Philadelphia. After the failure of the Saratoga campaign, the British largely abandoned operations in the Middle Colonies and pursued peace through subjugation in the Southern Colonies.

George Washington in the American Revolution

George Washington commanded the Continental Army in the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783). After serving as President of the United States, he briefly was in charge of a new army in 1798.

David Fanning (loyalist) American Revolutionary War militia leader and Canadian politician

David Fanning was a Loyalist leader in the American Revolutionary War in North and South Carolina. Fanning participated in approximately 36 minor engagements and skirmishes, and in 1781, captured the Governor of North Carolina, Thomas Burke, from the temporary capital at Hillsborough. Additionally, Fanning was captured by Patriot forces 14 times throughout the war, each time escaping or receiving a pardon. After the British defeat in the war, Fanning fled to Canada, where he was elected to the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick from 1791 to 1801 representing Kings County. After being convicted of rape in 1801, Fanning was expelled from New Brunswick, and settled in Nova Scotia, where he lived the remainder of his life.

African Americans in the Revolutionary War

In the American Revolution, gaining freedom was the strongest motive for black slaves who joined the Patriot or British armies. The free black may have been drafted or enlisted at his own volition.

Charles Cornwallis, 1st Marquess Cornwallis British general

Charles Cornwallis, 1st Marquess Cornwallis,, styled Viscount Brome between 1753 and 1762 and known as The Earl Cornwallis between 1762 and 1792, was a British Army general and official. In the United States and the United Kingdom he is best remembered as one of the leading British generals in the American War of Independence. His surrender in 1781 to a combined American and French force at the Siege of Yorktown ended significant hostilities in North America. He later served as a civil and military governor in Ireland, where he helped bring about the Act of Union; and in India, where he helped enact the Cornwallis Code and the Permanent Settlement.

1777 in the United States USA-related events during the year of 1777

Events from the year 1777 in the United States.

Cornwallis in North America

Charles, Earl Cornwallis (1738–1805) was a military officer who served in the British Army during the American War of Independence. He is best known for surrendering his army after the 1781 Siege of Yorktown, an act that ended major hostilities in North America and led directly to peace negotiations and the eventual end of the war.

Virginia in the American Revolution

The history of Virginia in the American Revolution begins with the role the Colony of Virginia played in early dissent against the British government and culminates with the defeat of General Cornwallis by the allied forces at the Siege of Yorktown in 1781, an event signaled the effective military end to the conflict. Numerous Virginians played key roles in the Revolution, including George Washington, Patrick Henry, and Thomas Jefferson.

Loyalists fighting in the American Revolution Overview Article of the Wikipedia

Colonists who supported the British cause in the American Revolution were Loyalists, often called Tories, or, occasionally, Royalists or King's Men. George Washington's winning side in the war called themselves "Patriots", and in this article Americans on the revolutionary side are called Patriots. For a detailed analysis of the psychology and social origins of the Loyalists, see Loyalist.

British Army during the American Revolutionary War time period of the British Army

The British Army during the American Revolutionary War served for eight years in campaigns fought around the globe. Defeat at the Siege of Yorktown to a combined Franco-US force ultimately led to the loss of the Thirteen Colonies in eastern North America, and the concluding Treaty of Paris deprived Britain of many of the gains achieved in the Seven Years' War. However several victories elsewhere meant that much of the British Empire remained intact.


  1. Brendan Simms, Three Victories and a Defeat: The Rise and Fall of the First British Empire, 1714–1783 (2008)
  2. (from 1777)
  3. (from 1778)
  4. The term "French Empire" colloquially refers to the empire under Napoleon, but it is used here for brevity to refer to France proper and to the colonial empire that the Kingdom of France ruled
  5. (from 1779)
  6. (1780–84)
  7. (1780–84)
  8. (until 1779)
  9. Hanover supplied troops per Personal union treaty, not as mercenaries
  10. Lowell, Edward J (1884), "The Hessians and the other German Auxiliaries of Great Britain in the Revolutionary War", Harper and Brothers Publishers, New York, Chapter II. Quote: "Five battalions of the Hanoverian subjects of George III were despatched to Gibraltar and Menorca"
  11. (from 1779)
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Duncan, Louis C. Medical Men in the American Revolution (1931).
  13. 1 2 Michael Lanning (2009). American Revolution 100: The Battles, People, and Events of the American War for Independence, Ranked by Their Significance. Sourcebooks. pp. 195–96. ISBN   978-1-4022-4170-3.
  14. 1 2 Jack P. Greene and J. R. Pole. A Companion to the American Revolution (Wiley-Blackwell, 2003), p. 328.
  15. Paullin, Charles Oscar (1906). The navy of the American Revolution: its administration, its policy and its achievements. The Burrows Brothers Co.
  16. "Privateers or Merchant Mariners help win the Revolutionary War". Retrieved May 25, 2017.
  17. Howarth 1991, p. 16
  18. Montero, Francisco Maria (1860), Historia de Gibraltar y de su campo (in Spanish), Imprenta de la Revista Médica, p. 356
  19. Chartrand & Courcelle 2006, p. 79.
  20. 1 2 Jonathan Dull, A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution (Yale University Press, 1985), p. 110.
  21. 1 2 "Red Coats Facts – British Soldiers in the American Revolution".
  22. 1 2 "The British Army 1775–1783" (PDF). orbat. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 27, 2013. Retrieved September 23, 2013.
  23. Chartrand & Courcelle 2006, p. 63: "Of 7,500 men in the Gibraltar garrison in September (including 400 in hospital), some 3,430 were always on duty"
  24. Winfield, Rif, British Warships in the Age of Sail: 1714–1792 (Seaforth Publishing, 2007) ISBN   9781844157006
  25. Winfield, Rif, British Warships in the Age of Sail 1714–1792: Design, Construction, Careers and Fates (Seaforth Publishing, 2007)
  26. 1 2 Mackesy (1964), pp. 6, 176 (British seamen).
  27. 1 2 Savas and Dameron (2006), p. xli
  28. Knesebeck, Ernst von dem (1845), "Geschichte de churhannoverschen Truppen in Gibraltar, Menorca und Ostindien", Published by Im Verlage der Helwingschen Hof-Buchhandlung. Note: The strength of a Hanoverian battalion is listed as 473 men
  29. 1 2 Lowell, Edward J (1884), "The Hessians and the other German Auxiliaries of Great Britain in the Revolutionary War", Harper and Brothers Publishers, New York, Chapter II
  30. Greene and Pole (1999), p. 393; Boatner (1974), p. 545.
  31. 1 2 Howard H. Peckham, ed., The Toll of Independence: Engagements and Battle Casualties of the American Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974).
  32. 1 2 Burrows, Edwin G. (Fall 2008). "Patriots or Terrorists". American Heritage. 58 (5). Archived from the original on March 23, 2013. Retrieved November 29, 2014.
  33. 1 2 Dawson, Warrington. "The 2112 Frenchmen who died in the United States from 1777 to 1783 while fighting for the American Independence". Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route. Journal de la societe des Americanistes. Archived from the original on June 5, 2017. Retrieved June 4, 2017.
  34. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Clodfelter, Micheal (2017). Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Encyclopedia of Casualty and Other Figures, 1492–2015, 4th ed. McFarland. p. 133. ISBN   978-0786474707.
  35. 1 2 3 "Spanish casualties in The American Revolutionary war". Necrometrics.
  36. Otfinoski, Steven (2008). The New Republic. Marshall Cavendish. ISBN   9780761429388.
  37. 1 2 Annual Register, 1783 (1785), pp. 199–200.
  38. 1 2 Parliamentary Register (1781), pp. 263–65.
  39. "Eighteenth Century Death Tolls". Retrieved January 7, 2016.
  40. 1 2 Parliamentary Register (1781), p. 269.
  41. 1 2 Mackesy (1964), pp. 6, 176 (British seamen)
  42. Burrows, Edwin. "Forgotten Patriots: The Untold Story of American Prisoners During the Revolutionary War." Basic Books. New York, 2008. p. 203.
  43. Modern British writers generally favor "American War of Independence", rather than "American Rebellion" or "War of American Independence". "National Curriculum England" . Retrieved April 21, 2016.
  44. The colony of Georgia joined later.
  45. Brooks, Richard (editor). Atlas of World Military History. HarperCollins, 2000, p. 101 "Washington's success in keeping the army together deprived the British of victory, but French intervention won the war."
  46. Chartrand, René (2006). Gibraltar 1779–83: The Great Siege. Osprey Publishing. ISBN   978-1-84176-977-6., p. 9
  47. Colin Bonwick, The American Revolution, 1991, pp. 71-72 ISBN   0-8139-1346-2
  48. Gladney, Henry M. (2014). No Taxation without Representation: 1768 Petition, Memorial, and Remonstrance (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on May 13, 2015.
  49. Dickinson, H. T (1977). Liberty and Property: Political Ideology in Eighteenth-century Britain – H.T. Dickinson. p. 218. ISBN   978-0-416-72930-6 . Retrieved January 7, 2015 via
  50. Charles Howard McIlwain (1938). The American Revolution: A Constitutional Interpretation. p. 51. ISBN   978-1-58477-568-3.
  51. Paul Boyer; et al. (2014). The Enduring Vision: A History of the American People. Cengage Learning. p. 142. ISBN   978-1-285-19339-7.
  52. Knollenberg, Growth, 48; Thomas, Duties Crisis, 76
  53. Young, Shoemaker, 183–85.
  54. Knollenberg, Growth, 69
  55. "What was the Boston Massacre?". Boston Massacre Society.
  56. "Boston Tea Party".
  57. "Avalon Project – Great Britain : Parliament – The Massachusetts Government Act; May 20, 1774".
  58. Ian R. Christie and Benjamin W. Labaree, Empire or Independence, 1760–1776 (New York: Norton, 1976) p. 188.
  59. Ammerman, David (1974). In the Common Cause: American Response to the Coercive Acts of 1774. New York: Norton., p. 9
  60. Ammerman points out that the act only permitted soldiers to be quartered in unoccupied buildings—although they were still private property. (Ammerman, In the Common Cause, 10)
  61. Ammerman, In the Common Cause, 15.
  62. Gary B. Nash; Carter Smith (2007). Atlas Of American History. Infobase Publishing. p. 64. ISBN   978-1-4381-3013-2.
  63. Peter Knight (2003). Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. pp. 184–85. ISBN   978-1-57607-812-9.
  64. Georgia did not attend
  65. Ferling, John. (2003). A Leap in the Dark. Oxford University Press. p. 112.
  66. Kindig, Thomas E. (1995). "Galloway's Plan for the Union of Great Britain and the Colonies". Declaration of Independence. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: Independence Hall Association, publishing electronically as Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 14, 2015. The plan was considered very attractive to most of the members, as it proposed a popularly elected Grand Council which would represent the interests of the colonies as a whole, and would be a continental equivalent to the English Parliament. After a sincere debate, it was rejected by a six to five vote on October 22, 1774. It may have been the arrival of the Suffolk County (Boston) resolutions that killed it.
  67. 1 2 Kramnick, Isaac (ed); Thomas Paine (1982). Common Sense. Penguin Classics. p. 21.
  68. "Resolved, 4. That the foundation of English liberty, and of all free government, is a right in the people to participate in their legislative council: and as the English colonists are not represented, and from their local and other circumstances, cannot properly be represented in the British parliament, they are entitled to a free and exclusive power of legislation in their several provincial legislatures, where their right of representation can alone be preserved, in all cases of taxation and internal polity, subject only to the negative of their sovereign, in such manner as has been heretofore used and accustomed: But, from the necessity of the case, and a regard to the mutual interest of both countries, we cheerfully consent to the operation of such acts of the British parliament, as are bonfide, restrained to the regulation of our external commerce, for the purpose of securing the commercial advantages of the whole empire to the mother country, and the commercial benefits of its respective members; excluding every idea of taxation internal or external, for raising a revenue on the subjects, in America, without their consent." quoted from the Declarations and Resolves of the First Continental Congress October 14, 1774.
  69. Cogliano, Francis D. Revolutionary America, 1763–1815: A Political History. Routledge, 1999. p. 47
  70. Cogliano, Revolutionary America, 47–48
  71. Alan Axelrod, The Real History of the American Revolution: A New Look at the Past, p. 83
  72. Fischer, p. 76
  73. Fischer, p. 85
  74. Chidsey, p. 6. This is the total size of Smith's force.
  75. Ketchum, pp. 18, 54
  76. Ketchum, pp. 2–9
  77. Ketchum pp. 110–11
  78. Adams, Charles Francis, "The Battle of Bunker Hill", in American Historical Review (1895–1896), pp. 401–13.
  79. Higginbotham (1983), pp. 75–77.
  80. Ketchum, pp. 183, 198–209
  81. Hugh F. Rankin, ed. (1987). Rebels and Redcoats: The American Revolution Through the Eyes of Those who Fought and Lived it. Da Capo Press. p. 63. ISBN   978-0-306-80307-9.CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
  82. Lecky, William Edward Hartpole, A History of England in the Eighteenth CentuIry (1882), pp. 449–50.
  83. McCullough, p. 53
  84. Frothingham, pp. 100–01
  85. John R. Alden (1989). A History of the American Revolution. Da Capo Press. pp. 188–90. ISBN   978-0-306-80366-6.
  86. Smith (1907), vol 1, p. 293
  87. Glatthaar (2006), p. 91
  88. Glatthaar (2006), p. 93
  89. Quebec was officially ceded in 1763
  90. Smith (1907), vol 1, p. 242
  91. Gabriel, Michael P. (2002). Major General Richard Montgomery: The Making of an American Hero. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press. ISBN   978-0-8386-3931-3., p. 141
  92. Mark R. Anderson, The Battle for the Fourteenth Colony: America's War of Liberation in Canada, 1774–1776 (University Press of New England; 2013).
  93. Alden, The American Revolution (1954) p. 206
  94. Willard Sterne Randall, "Benedict Arnold at Quebec", MHQ: Quarterly Journal of Military History, Summer 1990, Vol. 2, Issue 4, pp. 38–49.
  95. Davies, Blodwen (1951). Quebec: Portrait of a Province. Greenberg. p. 32. Carleton's men had won a quick and decisive victory
  96. Lanctot (1967), pp. 141–46
  97. Thomas A. Desjardin, Through a Howling Wilderness: Benedict Arnold's March to Quebec, 1775 (2006).
  98. Stanley, pp. 127–28
  99. Watson (1960), p. 203.
  100. Arthur S. Lefkowitz, Benedict Arnold's Army: The 1775 American Invasion of Canada during the Revolutionary War (2007).
  101. Smith (1907), volume 2, pp. 459–552
  102. Selby and Higginbotham, p. 2
  103. Levy, Andrew (January 9, 2007). The First Emancipator: Slavery, Religion, and the Quiet Revolution of Robert Carter. Random House Trade Paperbacks. p. 74. ISBN   978-0-375-76104-1.
  104. Scribner, Robert L. (1983). Revolutionary Virginia, the Road to Independence. University of Virginia Press. p. xxiv. ISBN   978-0-8139-0748-2.
  105. Russell, p. 73
  106. McCrady, p. 89
  107. Landrum, John Belton O'Neall (1897). Colonial and Revolutionary History of Upper South Carolina. Greenville, SC: Shannon. OCLC   187392639., pp. 80–81
  108. Wilson, David K (2005). The Southern Strategy: Britain's Conquest of South Carolina and Georgia, 1775–1780. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. ISBN   978-1-57003-573-9. OCLC   56951286., p. 33
  109. Hibbert, C: Rebels and Redcoats, p. 106
  110. Bicheno, H: Rebels and Redcoats, pp. 154, 158
  111. Field, Edward (1898). Esek Hopkins, commander-in-chief of the continental navy during the American Revolution, 1775 to 1778. Providence: Preston & Rounds. OCLC   3430958., p. 104
  112. McCusker, John J (1997). Essays in the economic history of the Atlantic world. London: Routledge. ISBN   978-0-415-16841-0. OCLC   470415294., pp. 185–87
  113. Riley, pp. 101–02
  114. Field, pp. 117–18
  115. Field, pp. 120–25
  116. "Declaration of Taking Up Arms: Resolutions of the Second Continental Congress". Constitution Society. Retrieved September 23, 2013.
  117. Ketchum, p. 211
  118. Maier, American Scripture, 25. The text of the 1775 king's speech is online, published by the American Memory project.
  119. Middlekauff, Glorious Cause, 168; Ferling, Leap in the Dark, 123–24.
  120. Maier, American Scripture, 25
  121. Andrew Jackson O'Shaughnessy, The Men who Lost America: British Leadership, the American Revolution, and the Fate of the Empire (Yale UP, 2013).
  122. Frank A. Biletz (2013). Historical Dictionary of Ireland. Scarecrow Press. p. 8. ISBN   9780810870918.
  123. Lecky (1891). A History of England. pp. 162–65.
  124. Vincent Morley (2002). Irish Opinion and the American Revolution, 1760–1783. Cambridge UP. pp. 154–57. ISBN   9781139434560.
  125. 1 2 Ketchum, pp. 208–09
  126. 1 2 Frothingham (1903), p. 298
  127. 1 2 John C. Miller (1959). Origins of the American Revolution. Stanford UP. pp. 410–12.
  128. 1 2 Scheer, p. 64
  129. 1 2 Jackson, Lowell, Edward (July 23, 1884). "The Hessians and the other German auxiliaries of Great Britain in the revolutionary war".
  130. David Smith (2012). New York 1776: The Continentals' First Battle. Osprey Publishing. pp. 21–23. ISBN   9781782004431.
  131. Christie and Labaree, Empire or Independence, 270; Maier, American Scripture, 31–32.
  132. Maier, American Scripture, 33–34
  133. Boyd, Evolution, 19
  134. Maier, American Scripture, 160–61
  135. Fischer (2004), p. 29.
  136. Maier, American Scripture, 156–57
  137. Encyclopedia of the American Revolution Mark M. Botner III, (1974) p. 1094.
  138. Liberty's Exiles; American Loyalists & the Revolutionary World. Maya Jasanoff (2011)
  139. The American Revolution; Colin Bonwick (1991) p. 152
  140. 1 2 3 Encyclopedia of American History. Richard B. Morris and Jeffrey B. Morris, eds., 6th Edition (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1982), p. 130.
  141. Flight of the Tories from the Republic, The Tories of the American Revolution. North Callahan (1967) p. 120.
  142. Land confiscation Records of north Carolina, Vol. 1 (1779–1800) Stewart Dunaway, p. 9
  143. Fischer, pp. 76–78
  144. Fischer, pp. 89, 381
  145. Ketchum (1973), p. 104
  146. 1 2 Adams, Charles Francis, "Battle of Long Island", in American Historical Review (1895–1896), p. 657.
  147. Fischer, pp. 88–102
  148. Ketchum (1973), p. 117
  149. Thomas J. McGuire (2011). Stop the Revolution: America in the Summer of Independence and the Conference for Peace. Stackpole Books. pp. 165–66. ISBN   9780811745086.
  150. Fischer, pp. 102–07
  151. 1 2 Fischer (2004), pp. 102–11.
  152. 1 2 Barnet Schecter, The battle for New York: The city at the heart of the American Revolution (2002).
  153. Ketchum pp. 111, 130
  154. Fischer, pp. 109–25
  155. 1 2 Ridpath, John Clark (1915). The new complete history of the United States of America, Volume 6. Cincinnati: Jones Brothers. OCLC   2140537., p. 2531
  156. 1 2 David McCullough (2006). 1776. p. 122. ISBN   9781451658255.
  157. 1 2 Stedman, Charles, The History of the Origin, Progress and Termination of the American War Volume I (1794), p. 221.
  158. Larry Lowenthal, Hell on the East River: British Prison Ships in the American Revolution (2009).
  159. Mary Tucker (March 1, 2002). Washington Crossing the Delaware. Lorenz Educational Press. pp. 22–23. ISBN   9780787785642.
  160. Stedman, Charles, The History of the Origin, Progress and Termination of the American War Volume I (1794), p. 223.
  161. Schecter, pp. 266–67
  162. Fischer, pp. 138–42
  163. Lecky (1891). A History of England. pp. 70–78.
  164. McCullough 2006 , p. 195.
  165. Ketchum (1973), pp. 191, 269
  166. Charles Francis Adams, "The Battle of Long Island," American Historical Review Vol. 1, No. 4 (Jul. 1896), pp. 650–70 in JSTOR
  167. Schecter, pp. 259–63
  168. Fischer p. 254. Casualty numbers vary slightly with the Hessian forces, usually between 21–23 killed, 80–95 wounded, and 890–920 captured (including the wounded).
  169. Fischer (2004), pp. 206–59.
  170. Wood, W. J (1995). Battles of the Revolutionary War, 1775–1781. Da Capo Press. ISBN   978-0-306-80617-9. ISBN   0306813297 (2003 paperback reprint), pp. 72–74
  171. Fischer p. 307
  172. Ketchum p. 286
  173. Ketchum (1973), pp. 388–89
  174. Schecter, p. 268
  175. McCullough p. 290
  176. Lengel p. 208
  177. Fischer (2004), pp. 345–58.
  178. 1 2 Lecky, William, A History of England in the Eighteenth Century, Vol. IV (1891), p. 57.
  179. Ketchum (1997), p. 84
  180. Ketchum (1997), p. 84.
  181. Ketchum (1997), pp. 244–49
  182. Gabriel, Michael P. (2012). The Battle of Bennington: Soldiers and Civilians. The History Press.
  183. Ketchum (1997), p. 283
  184. Ketchum (1997), pp. 337–78.
  185. Ketchum (1997), pp. 403–25.
  186. Edmund Morgan, The Birth of the Republic: 1763–1789 (1956) pp. 82–83
  187. Higginbotham (1983), pp. 188–98
  188. Stedman, Charles, The History of the Origin, Progress and Termination of the American War Volume I (1794), pp. 287–89.
  189. 1 2 Adams, Charles Francis. Campaign of 1777 Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society, Volume 44 (1910–11) pp. 25–26
  190. 1 2 Higginbotham, The War of American Independence, pp. 181–86
  191. 1 2 Adams, Charles Francis. "Campaign of 1777", Massachusetts Historical Society, Vol. 44 (1910–11), p. 43.
  192. Ward, Christopher. The War of the Revolution. (2 volumes. New York: Macmillan, 1952.) History of land battles in North America. p. 362
  193. Stephen R. Taaffe, The Philadelphia Campaign, 1777–1778 (2003), pp. 95–100 except and text search.
  194. 1 2 Rose, Michael (2007), Washington's War: From Independence to Iraq, , Retrieved on May 24, 2017
  195. 1 2 McGuire, p. 254
  196. 1 2 Cadwalader, Richard McCall (1901). Observance of the One Hundred and Twenty-third Anniversary of the Evacuation of Philadelphia by the British Army. Fort Washington and the Encampment of White Marsh, November 2, 1777:. pp. 20–28. Retrieved January 7, 2016.
  197. Freedman, 2008, pp. 1–30
  198. 1 2 Noel Fairchild Busch, Winter Quarters: George Washington and the Continental Army at Valley Forge (Liveright, 1974).
  199. 1 2 "A Concluding Commentary" Supplying Washington's Army (1981).
  200. 1 2 "The Winning of Independence, 1777–1783" American Military History Volume I (2005).
  201. Paul Douglas Lockhart, The Drillmaster of Valley Forge: The Baron de Steuben and the Making of the American Army (2008).
  202. 1 2 Frances H. Kennedy (2014). The American Revolution: A Historical Guidebook. Oxford UP. p. 163. ISBN   9780199324224.
  203. Text incorporated from Valley Forge National Historical Park website, which is in the public domain.
  204. Freedman, 2008, pp. 70–83
  205. Reid, Authority to Tax, 51.
  206. Stockley (2001), pp. 11–12
  207. Terry M. Mays (2009). Historical Dictionary of the American Revolution. Scarecrow Press. p. 7. ISBN   9780810875036.
  208. 1 2 3 Jones, Howard (2002). Crucible of Power: A History of American Foreign Relations to 1913. Scholarly Resources Inc. p. 5. ISBN   978-0-8420-2916-2.
  209. Hoffman, Ronald, and Peter J. Albert, eds. Diplomacy and Revolution: The Franco-American Alliance of 1778 (United States Capitol Historical Society, 1981)
  210. "Journal of the American Revolution, The Gunpowder shortage (September 9, 2013).
  211. James Brown Scott, Historical Introduction, pp. 8–9 in Samuel Flagg Bemis, Ed. The American Secretaries of State and their diplomacy V.1–2, 1963.
  212. "Springfield Armory". April 25, 2013. Retrieved May 8, 2013.
  213. Georges Édouard Lemaître (2005). Beaumarchais. Kessinger Publishing. p. 229.
  214. Thomas G. Paterson; et al. (2009). American Foreign Relations, Volume 1: A History to 1920. Cengage Learning. pp. 13–15.
  215. Perkins, James Breck, France In The Revolution (1911).
  216. Corwin, Edward Samuel, French Policy and the American Alliance (1916), pp. 121–48.
  217. Morris, Richard B. (1983) [1965]. The Peacemakers: The Great Powers and American Independence., p. 15
  218. Renaut, Francis P. (1922). Le Pacte de famille et l'Amérique: La politique coloniale franco-espagnole de 1760 à 1792. Paris., p. 290
  219. Caughey, John W. (1998). Bernardo de Gálvez in Louisiana 1776–1783. Gretna: Pelican Publishing Company. ISBN   978-1-56554-517-5., p. 87
  220. Mitchell, Barbara A. (Autumn 2012). "America's Spanish Savior: Bernardo de Gálvez". MHQ (Military History Quarterly). pp. 98–104., p. 99
  221. E. Chavez, Thomas (1997). Spain's Support Vital to United States Independence, 1777–1783. United States. Dept. of Defense. pp. United States.
  222. Sparks, Jared (1829–1830). The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution. Boston: Nathan Hale and Gray & Bowen., p. 1:408
  223. Fernández y Fernández, Enrique (1885). Spain's Contribution to the independence of the United States. Embassy of Spain: United States of America., p. 4
  224. Clarfield, Gerard. United States Diplomatic History: From Revolution to Empire. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1992.
  225. Stockley, Andrew (January 1, 2001). Britain and France at the Birth of America: The European Powers and the Peace Negotiations of 1782–1783. University of Exeter Press. p. 19. ISBN   978-0-85989-615-3 . Retrieved August 28, 2015.
  226. Chartrand, René (2006). Gibraltar 1779–83: The Great Siege. Osprey Publishing. p. 9. ISBN   978-1-84176-977-6.
  227. John Ferling (2007). Almost a Miracle: The American Victory in the War of Independence. Oxford UP. p. 294. ISBN   978-0-19-975847-0.
  228. Syrett (1998), p. 17
  229. 1 2 Scott, Hamish M. (1990). British Foreign Policy in the Age of the American Revolution. Clarendon Press. ISBN   978-0-19-820195-3., pp. 264–72
  230. 1 2 Cf. Richard Pares, (1936): 429–65
  231. Syrett, David (1998). The Royal Navy in European Waters During the American Revolutionary War. Univ of South Carolina Press. ISBN   978-1-57003-238-7., p. 18
  232. 1 2 3 Ketchum (1997), pp. 405–48
  233. 1 2 3 4 Higginbotham (1983), pp. 175–88
  234. Trevelyan (1912), vol. 1, pp. 4–5.
  235. 1 2 Alfred Thayer Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783 (Boston:Little, Brown, 1890), p. 534
  236. Edler 2001 , pp. 28–32
  237. Edler 2001 , pp. 42–62
  238. Edler 2001 , pp. 95–138
  239. Edler 2001 , pp. 62–69
  240. Edler 2001 , pp. 88–91, 151–152, 164
  241. Nickerson, Hoffman (1967) [1928]. The Turning Point of the Revolution. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat. OCLC   549809., p. 412
  242. Chartrand, René (2006). Gibraltar 1779–83: The Great Siege. Osprey Publishing. ISBN   978-1-84176-977-6., p. 9
  243. Harvey, Robert (2001), A Few Bloody Noses: The American War of Independence, London, ISBN   978-0-7195-6141-2, OCLC   46513518 , pp. 385–87
  244. Chartrand, René (2006). Gibraltar 1779–83: The Great Siege. Osprey Publishing. ISBN   978-1-84176-977-6., p. 37
  245. Selig, Robert A; et al. (1999), "5, sect 3", Rochambeau in Connecticut, Connecticut Historical Commission, retrieved December 7, 2007[ permanent dead link ].
  246. Patterson, Alfred Temple (1960), The Other Armada: The Franco-Spanish attempt to invade Britain in 1779, Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, p. 3
  247. "Bonhomme Richard". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships . Navy Department, Naval History and Heritage Command . Retrieved June 2, 2017.
  248. Black, Jeremy (1992). "Naval Power, Strategy and Foreign Policy, 1775–1791". In Michael Duffy (ed.). Parameters of British Naval Power, 1650–1850. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter Press. pp. 95–120, here: p.&nbsp, 105. ISBN   978-0-85989-385-5 . Retrieved April 12, 2013.
  249. Volo, M. James. Blue Water Patriots: The American Revolution Afloat, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. (2008) ISBN   9780742561205, p. 77
  250. Campbell, Thomas. Annals of Great Britain from the ascension of George III to the peace of Amiens, Printed by Mundell and co., for Silvester Doig and Andrew Stirling (1811). p. 56
  251. Gordon, William. The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the Independence of the United States of America, Books for Libraries Press (1969) ISBN   9780836950243, p. 4
  252. Campbell p. 36
  253. Syrett, p. 136
  254. Parkinson N, C. The Trade Winds: A Study of British Overseas Trade during the French wars, 1793–1815. Routledge; Reprint edition. ISBN   9780415381918, p. 38
  255. The encyclopaedia of London, p. 483
  256. Guthrie, William. A New Geographical, Historical And Commercial Grammar And Present State Of The World. Complete With 30 Fold Out Maps – All Present. J. Johnson Publishing (1808), p. 354, OCLC   222956803
  257. Ramsay, David. Universal History Americanized, or an Historical View of the World from the Earliest Records to the Nineteenth Century, with a Particular Reference to the State of Society, Literature, Religion, and Form of Government of the United States of America. Vol. VI (1819), p. 184
  258. Mirza, Rocky M. (2007). The Rise and Fall of the American Empire: A Re-Interpretation of History, Economics and Philosophy: 1492–2006. Trafford Publishing. ISBN   978-1-4251-1383-4 . Retrieved November 14, 2015., p. 185
  259. Boromé, Joseph (January 1969). "Dominica during French Occupation, 1778–1784". The English Historical Review. 84 (Volume 884, No. 330): 36–58. JSTOR   562321.
  260. Mirza, p. 185
  261. Mahan, pp. 429–32
  262. Colomb, Philip (1895). Naval Warfare, its Ruling Principles and Practice Historically Treated. London: W. H. Allen. OCLC   2863262., pp. 388–89
  263. Colomb, 389–391
  264. Castex, Jean-Claude (2004). Dictionnaire des batailles navales franco-anglaises. Presses Université Laval. ISBN   9782763780610., pp. 196–99
  265. Mahan, pp. 438–39
  266. James W. Raab (2007). Spain, Britain and the American Revolution in Florida, 1763–1783. p. 135. ISBN   978-0-7864-3213-4.
  267. "General Bernardo Galvez in the American Revolution".
  268. Chávez, Thomas E (2004). Spain and the Independence of the United States: An Intrinsic Gift. UNM Press. ISBN   978-0-8263-2794-9. OCLC   149117944., p. 151
  269. Chávez, p. 152
  270. Chávez, p. 153
  271. Chávez, p. 158
  272. Southey, Robert (2007). The Life of Horatio Lord Nelson. Teddington, UK: Echo Library. ISBN   978-1-4068-3003-3., p. 9
  273. 1 2 Southey p. 10
  274. de Saavedra de Sangronis, Francisco; Francisco Morales Padrón (2004). Diario de don Francisco de Saavedra. Madrid, Spain: Universidad de Sevilla. ISBN   9788447207824., p. 73
  275. Coleman, Terry (2004). The Nelson Touch: The Life and Legend of Horatio Nelson. London: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-517322-2., p. 32
  276. Linebaugh, Peter; Rediker, Marcus (2005). La hidra de la revolución: marineros, esclavos y campesinos en la historia oculta del Atlántico. Editorial Critica. ISBN   9788484326014., p. 307
  277. Sudgen, John (2004). Nelson: A Dream of Glory, 1758–1797. New York: Holt. ISBN   978-0-224-06097-4., p. 173
  278. Riddick, John F. (2006). The History of British India: A Chronology. Greenwood Publishing Group., pp. 23–25
  279. Barua, Pradeep (2005). The State at War in South Asia. University of Nebraska Press. ISBN   978-0-8032-1344-9., p. 79
  280. "History of Mahé". Archived from the original on December 30, 2013. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
  281. Almon, John; Deberett, John; Stockdale, John (1793). The Parliamentary Register; or History of the Proceedings and Debates of the House of Commons. New York Public Library., p. 56
  282. Cust, Eduard. (1862). "Annals of the Wars of the Eighteenth Century, Compiled from the Most Authentic Histories of the Period" Volume 3, University of Lausanne. p. 222
  283. Dalrymple, William (October 1, 2005). "Assimilation and Transculturation in Eighteen-Century India: A Response to Pankaj Mishra". Common Knowledge. 11 (3): 445–85. doi:10.1215/0961754X-11-3-445 . Retrieved June 2, 2017. As late as 1780, following the disastrous British defeat by Tipu Sultan of Mysore at the Battle of Pollilur, 7,000 British men, along with an unknown number of women, were held captive by Tipu in his sophisticated fortress of Seringapatam.
  284. Ramaswami, N.S. (1984). Political History of Carnatic under the Nawabs. New Delhi: Abhinav Publications. p. 225
  285. Barua, p. 80
  286. Morrissey, p. 77
  287. Daughan, George (2011) [2008]. If By Sea: The Forging of the American Navy – from the Revolution to the War of 1812. Basic Books. ISBN   978-0-465-02514-5. OCLC   701015376., pp. 174–75
  288. Morrissey, p. 78
  289. Dearden, Paul F (1980). The Rhode Island Campaign of 1778. Providence, RI: Rhode Island Bicentennial Federation. ISBN   978-0-917012-17-4. OCLC   60041024., pp. 102–06
  290. Hazard's Register of Pennsylvania: Devoted to the Preservation of Facts and Documents, and Every Kind of Useful Information Respecting the State of Pennsylvania, Volume 4. W.F. Geddes. 1829. p. 54.
  291. Eaton, Harry (1899). Jersey City and its historic sites. Jersey City, NJ: The Woman's Club. OCLC   6340873.
  292. Nelson, Paul David (1990). William Tryon and the course of empire: a life in British imperial service. UNC Press. ISBN   978-0-8078-1917-3., p. 170
  293. Bicheno, Hugh (2003). Redcoats and Rebels: The American Revolutionary War. London: Harper Collins. ISBN   978-0-00-715625-2. OCLC   51963515., p. 149
  294. Fischer, Joseph R. (2007). A Well Executed Failure: The Sullivan campaign against the Iroquois, July–September 1779. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. ISBN   978-1-57003-837-2.
  295. Alfred Creigh (1871). History of Washington County. B. Singerly. p. 49.
  296. Tolson, Jay (July 7–14, 2008). "How Washington's Savvy Won the Day". U.S. News & World Report.
  297. Jonathan Chandler, "‘To become again our brethren’: desertion and community during the American Revolutionary War, 1775–83." Historical Research 90#248 (2017): 363–80.
  298. Fleming, Thomas (1973). The Forgotten Victory: The Battle for New Jersey – 1780. New York: Reader's Digest Press. ISBN   978-0-88349-003-7., pp. 174–75
  299. Fleming, pp. 232, 302
  300. "July 15, 1780 – Benedict Arnold to John André (Code)", Spy Letters of the American Revolution – from the Collection of the Clements Collection, archived from the original on April 8, 2013, retrieved May 30, 2017
  301. Willard M. Wallace, Traitorous Hero: The Life and Fortunes of Benedict Arnold (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1954), pp. 263, 270
  302. Downes, Council Fires, 211; Nester, Frontier War, 194; Nelson, Man of Distinction, 101.
  303. James, James Alton, ed. George Rogers Clark Papers. 2 vols. Originally published 1912–1926. Reprinted New York: AMS Press, 1972. ISBN   0404015565, pp. 144–48
  304. Lowell Hayes Harrison, George Rogers Clark and the War in the West (2001).
  305. Grenier, John. The First Way of War: American War Making on the Frontier, 1607–1814. Cambridge University Press, 2005. ISBN   0521845661, p. 159. Grenier argues that "The slaughter the Indians and rangers perpetrated was unprecedented."
  306. Nelson, Larry L. A Man of Distinction among Them: Alexander McKee and the Ohio Country Frontier, 1754–1799. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1999. ISBN   0873386205 (hardcover). p. 118
  307. Gaff, Alan D. (2004). Bayonets in the Wilderness. Anthony Waynes Legion in the Old Northwest. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN   978-0-8061-3585-4.
  308. Scaggs, David Curtis, ed. The Old Northwest in the American Revolution: An Anthology. Madison: The State Historical Society of Wisconsin, 1977. ISBN   0870201646, p. 132
  309. Henry Lumpkin, From Savannah to Yorktown: The American Revolution in the South (2000).
  310. Morrill, Dan (1993). Southern Campaigns of the American Revolution. Nautical & Aviation Publishing., pp. 46–47
  311. Morrill (1993), pp. 48–50
  312. Wilson, David K (2005). The Southern Strategy: Britain's Conquest of South Carolina and Georgia, 1775–1780. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. ISBN   978-1-57003-573-9. OCLC   232001108., p. 112
  313. John W. Gordon and John Keegan, South Carolina and the American Revolution: A Battlefield History (2007).
  314. Peterson, 1970, pp. 234–38.
  315. Meacham, 2012, pp. 133–35; Ellis, 1996, p. 66; Gordon-Reed, 2008, pp. 136–37.
  316. "From Thomas Jefferson to Sampson Mathews, 12 January 1781 Founders Online, National Archives," last modified July 11, 2019, [Original source: The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 4, 1 October 1780 – 24 February 1781, ed. Julian P. Boyd. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1951, p. 343]
  317. Bryan, Charles (October 25, 2014). "Richmond's Benedict Arnold". Richmond Times Dispatch. Richmond, Virginia. Retrieved July 11, 2019.
  318. Hugh F. Rankin, North Carolina in the American Revolution (1996).
  319. Buchanan, John (1997). The Road To Guilford Court House: The American Revolution in the Carolinas. New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-0-471-32716-5., p. 202
  320. 1 2 Buchanan, p. 241
  321. Buchanan, p. 275
  322. 1 2 Clinton, H.; The American Rebellion; 1783
  323. Buchanan, p. 326
  324. 1 2 McGrath, Nick. "Battle of Guilford Courthouse". George Washington’s Mount Vernon: Digital Encyclopedia. Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association. Retrieved January 26, 2017.
  325. Lumpkin, From Savannah to Yorktown: The American Revolution in the South (2000).
  326. Greene, Francis Vinton D. General Greene, Appleton and Company 1893, p. 241
  327. Pancake, John (1985). This Destructive War. University of Alabama Press. ISBN   978-0-8173-0191-0.
  328. C. Cate, Alan (2006). Founding Fighters: The Battlefield Leaders who Made American Independence. Greenwood Publishing Group., p. 162
  329. Reynolds, Jr., William R. (2012). Andrew Pickens: South Carolina Patriot in the Revolutionary War. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc. ISBN   978-0-7864-6694-8.
  330. Pancake, John (1985). This Destructive War. University of Alabama Press. ISBN   978-0-8173-0191-0., p. 221
  331. 1 2 Bicheno, H: Rebels and Redcoats: The American Revolutionary War, London, 2003
  332. 1 2 Cornwallis; An Answer to Sir Henry Clinton's Narrative. Note: Cornwallis wrote this pamphlet shortly after the war in explanation of his actions.
  333. 1 2 Cornwallis Correspondence, Public Record Office
  334. Clinton, H.; The American Rebellion. Note: This lack of notification was one of Clinton's main arguments in his own defense in the controversy which followed the surrender at Yorktown.
  335. 1 2 Grainger, John (2005). The Battle of Yorktown, 1781: a Reassessment. Woodbridge, NJ: Boydell Press. ISBN   978-1-84383-137-2. OCLC   232006312., p. 29
  336. 1 2 Billias, George (1969). George Washington's Generals and Opponents: their Exploits and Leadership. New York: Da Capo Press. ISBN   978-0-306-80560-8. OCLC   229206429., pp. 267–75
  337. Dull, Jonathan R (1975). The French Navy and American Independence: A Study of Arms and Diplomacy, 1774–1787. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN   978-0-691-06920-3. OCLC   1500030., pp. 247–48
  338. Grainger, p. 40
  339. Dull, p. 241
  340. Ketchum, p. 139
  341. Grainger, pp. 43–44
  342. Michael Cecere, Great Things are Expected from the Virginians: Virginia in the American Revolution (2009).
  343. Johnston, Henry Phelps (1881). The Yorktown Campaign and the Surrender of Cornwallis, 1781. New York: Harper & Bros. OCLC   426009., p. 101
  344. Middleton, Richard (2014). "Naval Resources and the British Defeat at Yorktown, 1781". The Mariner's Mirror. 100 (1): 29–43. doi:10.1080/00253359.2014.866373.
  345. Duffy, Michael (1992). Parameters of British Naval Power, 1650–1850. University of Exeter Press. ISBN   978-0-85989-385-5 . Retrieved February 8, 2016., p. 110
  346. 1 2 Ketchum, p. 205
  347. Ketchum, p. 214
  348. Lengel, Edward (2005). General George Washington. New York: Random House Paperbacks. ISBN   978-0-8129-6950-4., p. 337
  349. Davis, Burke (2007). The Campaign that Won America. New York: HarperCollins. ISBN   978-0-8368-5393-3., p. 237
  350. Fleming, Thomas (1970). The Perils of Peace. New York: The Dial Press. ISBN   978-0-06-113911-6., p. 16
  351. Greene, pp. 307–08
  352. Ketchum, p. 241
  353. Richard Ferrie, The World Turned Upside Down: George Washington and the Battle of Yorktown (1999).
  354. Lewis Namier and John Brooke (1985). The House of Commons 1754–1790. p. 246. ISBN   9780436304200.
  355. Mackesy, p. 435.
  356. 1 2 Greene, p. 325
  357. Dirks, J. J. B. (1871), De Nederlandsche Zeemagt in Hare verschillende Tijdperken Geschetst. Deel 3 (in Dutch), Rotterdam: H. Nijgh, p. 291
  358. Edler, pp. 169–76
  359. Edler, F. (2001) [1911], The Dutch Republic and The American Revolution, Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of the Pacific, ISBN   978-0-89875-269-4 , pp. 193–98
  360. Edler, pp. 200–03
  361. Davies, Charles Maurice. The history of Holland and the Dutch nation, Volume 3
  362. Syrett p. 131
  363. Maj Gen Porter. History of the Corps of Royal Engineers. p. 208.
  364. Chartrand, Rene. The French Army in the American War of Independence (1994), pp. 54–56
  365. Stockley, p. 19
  366. "Bajas españolas de las baterías flotantes del ataque a Gibraltar el 13 de septiembre de 1782", Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish), Todo a Babor, retrieved March 11, 2010.
  367. Chartrand p. 84
  368. Fernández Duro, Cesáreo (1901). Armada Española desde la unión de los reinos de Castilla y Aragón. VII. Madrid, Spain: Sucesores de Rivadeneyra. p. 329
  369. (3 years, 7 months and 2 weeks)
  370. Syrett (2006), p. 105
  371. Chartrand, René; Courcelle, Patrice (2006), Gibraltar 1779–1783: The Great Siege, Gibraltar: Osprey, ISBN   978-1-84176-977-6, archived from the original on September 27, 2007, p. 86
  372. Edler, p. 184
  373. Edler, F. (2001) [1911]. The Dutch Republic and The American Revolution. Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of the Pacific. ISBN   0898752698.
  374. Nester, William R (2004). The frontier war for American independence. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books. ISBN   9780811700771, p. 291
  375. Nester, p. 291
  376. Bense, Judith Ann (1999). Archaeology of colonial Pensacola. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida. ISBN   9780813016610, p. 36
  377. Dupuy, R. Ernest; Hammerman, Gay; Hayes, Grace P (1977). The American Revolution: A Global War. New York: David McKay. ISBN   0679506489, p. 151
  378. Caughey pp. 209–11
  379. Chavez, Thomas E. Spain and the Independence of the United States: An Intrinsic Gift, University of New Mexico Press, 2003. p. 208
  380. Marley, David. Wars of the Americas: A Chronology of Armed Conflict in the New World, 1492 to the Present, ABC-CLIO (1998). ISBN   0874368375, p. 346
  381. Castex, Jean-Claude (2004). Dictionnaire des batailles navales franco-anglaises. Presses Université Laval. ISBN   9782763780610. pp. 175–76
  382. De Grasse, François Joseph Paul. The Operations of the French fleet under the Count de Grasse in 1781–2