Antiochus XII Dionysus

Last updated

Antiochus XII Dionysus
Antiochus XII bust.jpg
Antiochus XII's portrait on the obverse of a tetradrachm, wearing the royal diadem
King of Syria
Reign87 – 82 BC
Predecessor Demetrius III, Philip I
SuccessorPhilip I, Antiochus XIII, Cleopatra Selene
Bornbetween 124 and 109 BC
Died82 BC
IssueCleopatra, Antiochis
Dynasty Seleucid
Father Antiochus VIII
Mother Tryphaena

Antiochus XII Dionysus Epiphanes Philopator Callinicus (Ancient Greek : Ἀντίοχος Διόνυσος Ἐπιφανής Φιλοπάτωρ Καλλίνικος; between 124 and 109 BC – 82 BC) was a Hellenistic Seleucid monarch who reigned as King of Syria between 87 and 82 BC. The youngest son of Antiochus VIII and, most likely, his Egyptian wife Tryphaena, Antiochus XII lived during a period of civil war between his father and his uncle Antiochus IX, which ended with the assassination of Antiochus VIII in 96 BC. Antiochus XII's four brothers laid claim to the throne, eliminated Antiochus IX as a claimant, and waged war against his heir Antiochus X.


By 87 BC, only two claimants remained, both brothers of Antiochus XII: Demetrius III and Philip I. The realm of Demetrius III was initially centered in Damascus but later extended over most of Syria. Demetrius III was defeated by Philip I and went into exile in Parthia, allowing Antiochus XII to gain control of Damascus while Philip I remained in the Syrian capital Antioch. Antiochus XII consolidated his territory within inner Syria and did not seek to expand into the territories of Philip I, who attempted to annex Damascus but was repulsed. Antiochus XII focused his attention on Syria's southern reaches into which the Judaeans and Nabataeans sought to expand.

Antiochus XII reinforced his southern frontier and warred with his neighbors, conducting two campaigns against Nabataea that included engagements with Judea. After several victories in his first campaign, Antiochus XII was killed towards the end of his second campaign against the Nabateans at the Battle of Cana in 82 BC. Damascus was captured by the forces of the Nabatean King Aretas III, and the Syrian throne was claimed by Antiochus X's widow Cleopatra Selene and her son Antiochus XIII.

Name and background

Coin of Antiochus VIII, father of Antiochus XII Antiochus VIII.jpg
Coin of Antiochus VIII, father of Antiochus XII

Antiochus, Greek for "resolute in contention", [1] was a dynastic name borne by many Seleucid monarchs. [2] [3] The Seleucid dynasty's founder Seleucus I named the capital of Syria, Antioch, in honor of his father Antiochus. [4] Antiochus XII was the fifth and youngest son of Antiochus VIII and his Ptolemaic Egyptian wife Tryphaena, [note 1] [6] who married in 124 BC. [7] In 109 BC, Tryphaena was killed by Antiochus VIII's half-brother Antiochus IX, [8] who fought with Antiochus VIII from 113 BC for the throne of Syria. [9] Antiochus XII's brothers were Seleucus VI, Antiochus XI, Philip I and Demetrius III. [10]

Following Antiochus VIII's assassination in 96 BC, [11] his second wife, Tryphaena's sister Cleopatra Selene, [12] married Antiochus IX and then his son Antiochus X, [13] who fought with Antiochus XII's four brothers for the throne. [14] By 88 BC, only Demetrius III and Philip I remained; [15] Demetrius III was originally based in Damascus before extending his authority to most of Syria. [16] He was defeated by Philip I and his Parthian allies in 87 BC and exiled to Parthia, where he died of an unknown illness. Philip I took control of the capital, [17] while Cleopatra Selene, now a widow, took shelter in Ptolemais with her sons by Antiochus X. [18]


The departure of Demetrius III left a power vacuum in Damascus that was filled by Antiochus XII. [19] Coins minted during the reign of Demetrius III are dated to the Seleucid year (SE) 225 (88/87 BC), [note 2] while the earliest coins minted during the reign of Antiochus XII have the date 226 SE (87/86 BC), suggesting there was a rapid assumption of power by Antiochus XII. [17] Monarchs of the Hellenistic period did not use regnal numbers, which is a more modern practice, but instead used epithets to distinguish themselves from similarly named monarchs; [2] [21] Three of Antiochus XII's four epithets, Epiphanes (illustrious)–previously used by his father, Philopator (father-loving) and Callinicus (nobly victorious), served to emphasize the ancestry of his grandfather Demetrius II in contrast to the line of the latter's brother Antiochus VII, which was represented by Antiochus IX and his descendants; [22] Callinicus may have been an echo of Demetrius II's epithet Nikator (victorious). [note 3] He likely used his other epithet Dionysus to associate himself with the Greek god of wine in his role as conqueror of the East. [note 4] [22] Antiochus XII was depicted on coinage with an exaggerated hawked nose in the likeness of his father, as a means of strengthening the legitimacy of his succession. [27]

Policies and territory

Tetradrachm of Antiochus XII depicting the Semitic deity Hadad on the reverse Antiochus XII Houghton 864v.jpg
Tetradrachm of Antiochus XII depicting the Semitic deity Hadad on the reverse

According to historian Alfred Bellinger, Antiochus XII may have received assistance from Ptolemaic Egypt to gain his throne. This view is reflected in Antiochus XII's policies, which were targeted at the south in Nabataea and Judaea, but not towards expansion within the kingdom of Syria. [28] His dominion was limited to inner Syria, centered on Damascus, which served as his capital and primary mint. [note 5] [32] Antiochus XII also ruled over the town of Gadara, governed by an official named Philotas. [33] In 100 BC, Gadara had been conquered by the Hasmonean king of Judea Alexander Jannaeus, who partially destroyed its walls, [34] but it was recaptured by the Seleucids in 93 BC. [note 6] [36] Gadara held great strategic importance for Syria as it served as a major military hub for operations in the south. Controlling it was vital to the war effort against the Judaeans, which led Antiochus to rebuild the city's defenses in 228 SE (85/84 BC). [39] Historian Aryeh Kasher suggested that Antiochus XII dug what the first-century historian Josephus called the "trench of Antiochus" (or valley of Antiochus) to protect Damascus from the Nabataeans; the trench was probably located in the Hula Valley. [40] [41]

Seleucid coins often had depictions of their Greek deities, [42] but the silver coinage of Antiochus XII depicted the supreme Semitic god Hadad on the reverse, possibly in recognition of the shrinking borders of the kingdom, which convinced the monarch of the importance of the local cults. [43] By promoting indigenous deities, Seleucid kings hoped to gain the support of their non-Greek subjects. [44] According to Bellinger, the use of Hadad indicated that Antiochus XII placed focus on his "intention of being first and foremost king of Damascus". [28] During his reign, Demetrius III had also depicted a Semitic deity, Atargatis, on his currency. In the view of historian Kay Ehling  [ de ], the change of coin imagery from Atargatis to Hadad probably served two goals: to imply that Antiochus XII had a different policy focus than his predecessor, and to demonstrate his intention of maintaining a good relationship with the Semitic population of Damascus, who comprised the majority of the inhabitants, to avoid tension with Greek settlers. [24] Seleucid kings presented themselves as protectors of Hellenism and patronized intellectuals and philosophers, but Antiochus XII may have adopted a different attitude; he ordered the expulsion of such scholars. [note 7] [46] [47]

Military campaigns

Syria in 87 BC Syria under the Seleucids 87 BC.png
Syria in 87 BC

Early in his reign, Antiochus XII attacked the Nabataeans and the Judaeans, whose territories both lay south of his own. This conflict was recorded by Josephus, although he made no mention of the name of the Nabataean king. [50] Josephus mentioned two campaigns against the Nabataeans, but did not explain the motives leading the Syrian King to attack them. Modern scholars presented several theories. In the view of Israel Shatzman, Antiochus XII may have feared the growing power of the Nabataeans, who were expanding into southern Syria. [51] Zayn Bilkadi suggested that Antiochus XII wanted to take control over the Nabataeans' crude oil industry, [52] while Alexander Fantalkin and Oren Tal suggested that the Nabataeans actively supported Philip I in his attempts to take control over Antiochus XII's realm. [53]

First Nabataean campaign and the incursions of Philip I

Antiochus XII's first Nabataean campaign was launched in 87 BC, [54] and might have included a battle near Motho, modern Imtan in the region of Hauran, as proposed by the historian Hans Peter Roschinski, who drew on the writings of Stephanus of Byzantium. [51] The Byzantine historian preserved in his book, Ethica, fragments from a lost work by the historian Uranius of Apamea, who wrote a book titled Arabica, which has been dated to 300 AD. [55] [56] In the account of Uranius, King Antigonus I (r. 306–301 BC) is killed at Motho by a king of the Arabs named Rabbel. [56] The name Motho could refer to a northern city in Hauran or a southern city in Moab. [note 8] [57] The name of Antigonus was regularly "corrected" to Antiochus by different scholars who believed that Uranius was referring to Antiochus XII. [note 9] [58] Roschinski considered it conceivable that Stephanus was conflating two events taking place during the reign of the Nabataean King Rabbel I: a battle of Antiochus XII's first Nabataean campaign at Motho in the north, and the battle from the second Nabataean campaign in which Antiochus XII was killed. [54] Shatzman, on the other hand, noted that nowhere in his work did Stephanus indicate that the battle of Motho took place in the north. [51]

Taking advantage of his brother's absence, Philip I seized Damascus, [59] aided by the governor of the city's citadel, Milesius, who opened the gates to him. According to Josephus, Milesius received no reward from Philip I, who attributed the betrayal to the general's fear, leading Milesius to betray Philip I, who had left the city to attend an event in the nearby hippodrome. The general closed the gates, locking Philip I out, and awaited the return of Antiochus XII, who had hastily ended his campaign when he heard of his brother's occupation of the city. [note 10] [61] Modern scholars noted that Seleucid currency, struck during campaigns against a rival (or usurper), portrayed the King sporting a beard. [62] During his first two years, Antiochus XII's visage appeared beardless, but this changed in 228 SE (85/84 BC). This is possibly related to Philip I's attack on Damascus, but this supposition has little support, as Antiochus XII failed to take any action against his brother. [63] No coins were minted during the period that Philip I held Damascus, indicating only a brief occupation of the city. [59]

Second Nabataean campaign, war in Judea and death

Although his territory directly abutted Nabataean territory, for his second Nabataean campaign Antiochus XII instead chose to march his forces through Judaea along the coast, [50] probably to attack the Nabataean-dominated Negev, which would have cut off the port city of Gaza, threatened Nabataean Mediterranean trade, and curbed Nabataean ambitions in the Transjordan. This route would have allowed Antiochus XII to keep Alexander Jannaeus at bay. [64] According to Josephus, the Judaean King feared Antiochus XII's intentions and ordered the "Yannai Line" to be built, which consisted of a trench that fronted a defensive wall dotted with wooden towers. The trench stretched 28 kilometers (17 mi) from Caphersaba to the sea near Joppa. [53] Antiochus XII leveled the trench, burned the fortifications, and continued his march into Nabataean territory. [65]

The account of the campaign, written by Josephus, is subject to some debate; the historian wrote that Antiochus XII's forces defeated those of Alexander Jannaeus, but the eighth-century historian George Syncellus mentioned a defeat suffered by Antiochus XII at the hands of the Judaean king. [note 11] [66] The existence of the Yannai Line has been questioned by several historians, [note 12] [65] and Josephus' explanation of Alexander Jannaeus' attempt to stop the march of Antiochus XII, because of his fears of the latter's intentions, is unsatisfactory. Both the Nabataeans and Syrians were enemies of Judea and it would have been to Alexander Jannaeus' benefit if those two powers were in conflict. [70] Syncellus may have been referring to an earlier confrontation between the Syrian king and Alexander Jannaeus. [66] Thus the statement of Syncellus supports the notion that Antiochus XII's second Nabataean campaign was also aimed at Judea; perhaps Antiochus XII sought to annex the coastal cities of Alexander Jannaeus as retribution for the defeat mentioned by Syncellus. [70] Another objective would be subduing the Judaeans to keep them from attacking Syria while Antiochus XII was busy in Nabataea. [68]

The final engagement between the forces of Antiochus XII and the Nabataeans occurred near the village of Cana, [note 13] [71] the location of which is unknown, but is generally assumed by modern scholars to be southwest of the Dead Sea. [51] Historian Siegfried Mittmann considered it to be synonymous with Qina, modern-day Horvat Uza, as mentioned by Josephus in Book 15 of his Antiquities. [72] Details of the battle, as written by Josephus, spoke of the Nabataeans employing a feigned retreat, [73] then counterattacking the Syrian forces before their ranks could be ordered. Antiochus XII managed to rally his troops and weathered the attack, but he fought in the front lines, jeopardizing his life, and he eventually fell. [71] The year of Antiochus XII's death is debated, [74] but his last coins struck in Damascus are dated to 230 SE (83/82 BC). [59]

Aftermath and legacy

A coin of Antiochus XII with Zeus depicted on the reverse Antiochos XII Dionysos & Zeus Aetophoros.jpg
A coin of Antiochus XII with Zeus depicted on the reverse

According to Josephus, the death of the King resulted in a rout of the Syrian forces, with many being killed in the field or during the retreat. Survivors of the rout sheltered in Cana, where most died of starvation. [71] Antiochus XII was the last energetic Seleucid king. Little is recorded of Philip I after his attempt at annexing Damascus, which was left without a protector after the death of Antiochus XII. Fearing the Ituraean ruler, Ptolemy of Chalcis, the people of Damascus invited Aretas III of Nabataea to take the city. [note 14] [54] The numismatist Oliver D. Hoover suggested that Aretas III did not hold Damascus for long before the city returned to Seleucid possession. [76]

The identity of Antiochus XII's wife remains unknown, [77] but according to the sixth-century historian John Malalas, whose work is considered generally unreliable by scholars, [78] the King had two daughters, Cleopatra and Antiochis. [79] Cleopatra Selene, who went into hiding after the death of Antiochus X in 224 SE (89/88 BC), [80] [81] took advantage of Antiochus XII's death and declared her son Antiochus XIII king [82] [83] with herself as queen regent and regnant. [84] [85] Coins struck during her regency show the marks of the Damascus mint. Archeologist Nicholas L. Wright suggested that Cleopatra Selene's takeover of Damascus took place after 80 BC. [82] Josephus called Antiochus XII the last Seleucid king, [86] and Malalas, according to the translation of the historian Glanville Downey, followed suit; [87] the last Seleucid king was in fact Antiochus XIII, who was dethroned in 64 BC after Antioch was annexed by the Romans. [note 15] [91]

Family tree

Family tree of Antiochus XII
Seleucus IV [lower-roman 1] Laodice IV [lower-roman 1] [lower-roman 2] Ptolemy V [lower-roman 3] Cleopatra I [lower-roman 3]
Demetrius I [lower-roman 2] Laodice V [lower-roman 2] Ptolemy VI [lower-roman 4] Cleopatra II [lower-roman 4]
Demetrius II [lower-roman 5] Cleopatra Thea [lower-roman 6] Cleopatra III [lower-roman 7] Ptolemy VIII [lower-roman 7]
Antiochus VIII [lower-roman 8] Tryphaena [lower-roman 8]
Antiochus XII

See also


  1. Ancient sources do not mention the name of Antiochus XII's mother but it is generally assumed by modern scholars that she was Tryphaena, who was mentioned explicitly by Porphyry as the mother of Antiochus XII's older twin brothers, Antiochus XI and Philip I. [5]
  2. Some dates in the article are given according to the Seleucid era. Each Seleucid year started in the late autumn of a Gregorian year; thus, a Seleucid year overlaps two Gregorian ones. [20]
  3. It could also mean he was portraying himself as an able warrior capable of defending his people against his enemies, the Nabataeans. [22]
  4. Dionysus had many functions, including his role as a god of vegetation, which is probably not the reason why Antiochus XII invoked him in his epithet; [23] several arguments were presented by modern scholars to explain the appearance of the epithet:
    • Since both his mother and grandmother were Ptolemaic, it is also possible that he meant to emphasize his Ptolemaic descent since the epithet was used by Ptolemaic kings. [24]
    • The Syro-Phoenician religious complex was based on triads that include a supreme god, a supreme goddess, and their son; the deities taking those roles were diverse. It is possible that by 145 BC, Dionysus took the role of the son, a view rejected by the historian Jane L. Lightfoot. [25] The numismatist Nicholas L. Wright presented the hypothesis that a Seleucid king appearing on his coins wearing a radiate crown indicated a ritual marriage between the king and Atargatis, Syria's supreme goddess. Hence, the king is considering himself the manifestation of Syria's supreme god. Antiochus VIII appeared with the radiate crown, and it is probable, in the view of Wright, that by assuming the epithet Dionysus, Antiochus XII was proclaiming that he was not just Antiochus VIII's political successor, but also his spiritual heir, being the son of the supreme god. [26]
  5. Ernest Babelon attributed some of the King's coins to the mint of Ptolemais, based on the existence of the monogram Monogram Antiochus 12.png , but this attribution was rejected by Edward Theodore Newell, [29] which is the academic consensus. [30] The monogram appeared on a minority of the coins issued in Ptolemais and it also appeared on coins issued in other cities, making the use of it to determine a certain mint futile. [31]
  6. The Nabataean king Obodas I defeated the Judaeans at some point before 93 BC; this is deduced from the account of Josephus, who stated that following the defeat Alexander Jannaeus was caught in a civil war that lasted six years. Since this war ended only with the intervention of Demetrius III who lost his throne in 87 BC, then the year 93 BC is the terminus post quem for the defeat. [35] Philotas commissioned an inscription, dated to 228 SE (85/84 BC), celebrating the reconstruction of Gadara's defensive walls. [36] It seems that Gadara freed itself from Judea following the latter's defeat at the hands of the Nabataeans. [37] [38]
  7. A letter from a king named Antiochus, regarding the expulsion of all philosophers from the kingdom, is contained in the Deipnosophistae written by the second-century rhetorician Athenaeus. [45] The king wanted the philosophers exiled for corrupting young men; the latter were to be hanged and their fathers investigated. There are indications in the document that this Antiochus ruled during the late Seleucid period; historian Edwyn Bevan, considering the general Seleucid patronage of philosophers, noted that those instructions are "incredible". According to Bevan, this attitude can be explained by the deteriorating fortunes of the kingdom during the late Seleucid period; cities in Syria and Cilicia were asserting their independence, and it would be logical for the king to move against philosophers if they showed signs of "republicanism". [46] Another clue is that the king sent his letter to an official named "Phanias", who seems to have been the highest official in the realm, ordering him to expel the philosophers from the polis and chora (city and its territory). [47] [45]
    Bevan did not believe that Antiochus wanted the philosophers expelled from the kingdom, but maybe from one city, perhaps Antioch. [46] But, in the view of historian Jörg-Dieter Gauger  [ de ], the polis and chora designate the whole kingdom since it would have made little sense if they designated one city and its region; the philosophers could have continued their "evil" business in other cities. If one official, Phanias, whom the letter's language indicates that only he had a higher command and was not a mere city commander, can execute the king's instructions in the whole county, then the kingdom's area is not substantial, indicating a period when the Seleucids ruled a contracted Syria. [47] Bevan suggested Antiochus XIII (r. 82–64 BC), while Gauger suggested either Antiochus XII or Antiochus XIII as the king who ordered the philosophers banished. [48] [47]
    Franz Altheim considered king Antiochus IV (r. 175–164 BC) to be the king who sent the letter. The document's authenticity is questioned: Ludwig Radermacher considered the letter a Jewish forgery to discredit their enemy Antiochus IV, while Michel Austin, ancient history senior lecturer at the University of St Andrews, did not comment on the historical setting of the letter but doubted its authenticity. [49]
  8. In the Notitia Dignitatum , Motho is where the Roman Cohors I Augusta Thracum Equitata was stationed. The city of Mu'tah in Moab, where the Equites Scutarii Illyriciani was stationed, is named Motha in the Notitia Dignitatum. [57]
  9. The historian Józef Milik rejected the practice of correcting Uranius' work. Milik believed that instead of Antigonus I or Antiochus XII, the passage refers to Athenaeus, an official of Antigonus who fought the Nabataeans. [58]
  10. The citadel is called "akra" by Josephus; a word that indicates a garrisoned fortified camp located in the outskirts of a city. Josephus also implied that the citadel was close to the hippodrome of Damascus, whose remains are located under the Dahdah cemetery  [ ar ] just outside the ancient city. [60]
  11. It seems that Syncellus did not rely only on Josephus and had access to other sources; Heinrich Gelzer suggested that Syncellus used the account of Justus of Tiberias. [66] It is possible that Josephus deliberately ignored the victories of Alexander Jannaeus; this can be explained by Josephus' reliance on the first century BC historian Nicolaus of Damascus, whose treatment of the Hasmonean dynasty is hostile due to the latter's role in destroying many Hellenistic centers. [67]
  12. The trench of Alexander Jannaeus was named the "Yannai Line" by Jacob Kaplan in the 1950s. Kaplan interpreted archeological remains from Bnei Brak and Tel Aviv as parts of that line and his conclusions were generally accepted by the majority of scholars. [65] Bezalel Bar-Kochva raised questions regarding the line, noting that it would have taken Antiochus XII ten to fifteen days to march from Damascus to the Sharon plain where the line purportedly stood, which would not be sufficient time for such a project to be constructed. [53] Kenneth Atkinson suggested that Alexander Jannaeus constructed the Yannai Line after defeating Antiochus XII, in anticipation of Antiochus XII's return. [68] Bar-Kochva suggested that the line was erected earlier than Antiochus XII's invasion, perhaps to fend off a different enemy. He suggested that the plain stretching 4 kilometers (2.5 mi) between western Samaria and Tel Afek east of the Yarkon River's source was the location of the line. [53] The archeological remains interpreted by Kaplan as evidence for the line do not fit the time frame of Antiochus XII's invasion and may belong to non-military civilian establishments. [69]
  13. If the account of Uranius is accepted, and if he meant Antiochus XII instead of Antigonus I, then the last battle took place near Motho in Moab. [56]
  14. It is not known if it was Aretas III who defeated Antiochus XII. [56] The identity of the Syrian king's Nabataean enemy is much debated. [74] Albert Kammerer  [ fr ] and Philip C. Hammond used the account of Uranius and asserted that it was Rabbel I. [54] Jean Starcky argued that the Nabataean monarch was Obodas I, [75] whom Maurice Sartre preferred and concluded that he probably did not survive long after his battle with Antiochus XII. [56]
  15. The most complete surviving copy of Malalas' work, who wrote in the sixth century, is the Baroccianus Graecus manuscript from the eleventh century, which includes many abbreviations and missing words. [88] Malalas himself used vernacular Greek, making his language sometimes difficult to understand. [89] Different scholars presented their reading of Malalas' chronicles:
    • The reading of Glanville Downey have "Antiochus Dionysus the Leper, father of Cleopatra and Antiochis". [90] Downey noted that Malalas conflated Antiochus XII with his successor Antiochus XIII, who surrendered to the Romans in 64 BC; the Byzantine historian attributed the act of surrender to Antiochus XII. The Greek version of Malalas' work has the name "Antiochus Dionikous" while the older Church Slavonic version has "Antiochus Dionysos". [91] The German translation by Johannes Thurn  [ de ] and Mischa Meier  [ de ] matched Downey's English reading. [92]
    • In the translation of Elizabeth Jeffreys (et al.), the passage reads: "Antiochus, the son of Dionikes the leper, father of Cleopatra and Antiochis." [93]
    Tigranes II of Armenia conquered Syria c. 74 BC; [94] according to Malalas, Antiochus Dionysos asked Pompey to be reinstated on the throne following the ejection of Tigranes II by the Romans. The Syrian king was granted his wish and in his will, he bequeathed Syria to the Romans, thus ending the Seleucid dynasty. [91] Bellinger noted the contradictions in Malalas' statements, as the Byzantine historian mentioned earlier in his account that Pompey annexed Antioch. In the view of Bellinger, Malalas' account is nonsense. [95] Downey also questioned the account but considered it possible that Malalas used local Antiochene sources that attempted to scale down the humiliation of annexation inventing the story of an abdication, which in itself is not out of question, and the bequeathing had a precedent in Roman history; Attalus II of Pergamon bequeathed his kingdom to Rome in 138 BC. [91]

Related Research Articles

Alexander Balas

Alexander I Theopator Euergetes, surnamed Balas, was the ruler of the Greek Seleucid kingdom in 150/Summer 152 – August 145 BC. Alexander defeated Demetrius I Soter for the crown in 150 BC. Ruling briefly, he lost the crown to Demetrius II Nicator during his defeat at the Battle of Antioch in Syria, dying shortly after. His reign marks the beginning of the disintegration of the Seleucid realm, with important eastern satrapies such as Media being lost to the nascent Parthian Empire.

Demetrius II Nicator

Demetrius II, called Nicator, was one of the sons of Demetrius I Soter. His mother may have been Laodice V, as was the case with his brother Antiochus VII Sidetes. Demetrius ruled the Seleucid Empire for two periods, separated by a number of years of captivity in Hyrcania in Parthia, first from September 145 BC to July/August 138 BC, and again from 129 BC until his death in 125 BC. His brother Antiochus VII ruled the Seleucid Empire in the interim between his two reigns.

Demetrius III Eucaerus King of Syria

Demetrius III Theos Philopator Soter Philometor Euergetes Callinicus was a Hellenistic Seleucid monarch who reigned as the King of Syria between 96 and 87 BC. He was a son of Antiochus VIII and, most likely, his Egyptian wife Tryphaena. Demetrius III's early life was spent in a period of civil war between his father and his uncle Antiochus IX, which ended with the assassination of Antiochus VIII in 96 BC. After the death of their father, Demetrius III took control of Damascus while his brother Seleucus VI prepared for war against Antiochus IX, who occupied the Syrian capital Antioch.

Diodotus Tryphon

Diodotus or Trypho was a king of the Hellenistic Seleucid Empire. Initially an official under King Alexander I Balas, he led a revolt against Alexander's successor Demetrius II Nicator in 144 BC. He rapidly gained control of most of Syria and the Levant. At first he acted as regent and tutor for Alexander's infant son Antiochus VI Dionysus, but after the death of his charge in 142/141 BC, Diodotus declared himself king. He took the royal name Tryphon Autocrator and distanced himself from the Seleucid dynasty. For a period between 139 and 138, he was the sole ruler of the Seleucid empire. However, in 138 BC Demetrius II's brother Antiochus VII Sidetes invaded Syria and brought his rule to an end.

Antiochus VII Sidetes Antiochus VII Sidetes

Antiochus VII Euergetes, nicknamed Sidetes, also known as Antiochus the Pious, was ruler of the Hellenistic Seleucid Empire who reigned from July/August 138 to 129 BC. He was the last Seleucid king of any stature. After Antiochus was killed in battle, the Seleucid realm was restricted to Syria.

Alexander II Zabinas King of Syria

Alexander II Theos Epiphanes Nikephoros was a Hellenistic Seleucid monarch who reigned as the King of Syria between 128 BC and 123 BC. His true parentage is debated; depending on which ancient historian, he either claimed to be a son of Alexander I or an adopted son of Antiochus VII. Most ancient historians and the modern academic consensus maintain that Alexander II's claim to be a Seleucid was false. His surname "Zabinas" (Ζαβίνας) is a Semitic name that is usually translated as "the bought one". It is possible, however, that Alexander II was a natural son of Alexander I, as the surname can also mean "bought from the god". The iconography of Alexander II's coinage indicates he based his claims to the throne on his descent from Antiochus IV, the father of Alexander I.

Antiochus X Eusebes King of Syria

Antiochus X Eusebes Philopator was a Hellenistic Seleucid monarch who reigned as the King of Syria between 95 BC and 92 BC or 89/88 BC. He was the son of Antiochus IX and perhaps his Egyptian wife Cleopatra IV. He lived in a period during which there was a general disintegration of Seleucid Syria characterized by civil wars, foreign interference by Ptolemaic Egypt and incursions by the Parthians. Antiochus IX was killed in 95 BC at the hands of Seleucus VI, the son of his half-brother and rival Antiochus VIII. Antiochus X then went to the city of Aradus where he declared himself king. He avenged his father by defeating Seleucus VI, who was eventually killed.

Philip I Philadelphus King of Syria

Philip I Epiphanes Philadelphus was a Hellenistic Seleucid monarch who reigned as the King of Syria from 94 to either 83 or 75 BC. The son of Antiochus VIII and his wife Tryphaena, he spent his early life in a period of civil war between his father and his uncle Antiochus IX. The conflict ended with the assassination of Antiochus VIII and a quick succession in the Syrian capital Antioch of Antiochus IX then Antiochus VIII's eldest son Seleucus VI.

Antiochus XI Epiphanes King of Syria

Antiochus XI Epiphanes Philadelphus was a Seleucid monarch who reigned as King of Syria between 94 and 93 BC, during the Hellenistic period. He was the son of Antiochus VIII and his wife Tryphaena. Antiochus XI's early life was a time of constant civil war between his father and his uncle Antiochus IX. The conflict ended with the assassination of Antiochus VIII, followed by the establishment of Antiochus IX in Antioch, the capital of Syria. Antiochus VIII's eldest son Seleucus VI, in control of western Cilicia, marched against his uncle and had him killed, taking Antioch for himself, only to be expelled from it and driven to his death in 94 BC by Antiochus IX's son Antiochus X.

Seleucus VI Epiphanes King of Syria

Seleucus VI Epiphanes Nicator was a Hellenistic Seleucid monarch who ruled Syria between 96 and 94 BC. He was the son of Antiochus VIII and his Egyptian wife Tryphaena. Seleucus VI lived in a period of civil war between his father and his uncle Antiochus IX, which ended in 96 BC when Antiochus VIII was assassinated. Antiochus IX then occupied the capital Antioch while Seleucus VI established his power-base in western Cilicia and himself prepared for war. In 95 BC, Antiochus IX marched against his nephew, but lost the battle and was killed. Seleucus VI became the master of the capital but had to share Syria with his brother Demetrius III, based in Damascus, and his cousin, Antiochus IX's son Antiochus X.

Antiochus VIII Grypus Antiochus VIII Callinicus/Philometor

Antiochus VIII Epiphanes/Callinicus/Philometor, nicknamed Grypus, was the ruler of the Syrian Seleucid Empire from 125 to 96 BC. He was the younger son of Demetrius II and Cleopatra Thea. He may have spent his early life in Athens and returned to Syria after the deaths of his father and brother Seleucus V. At first he was joint ruler with his mother. Fearing her influence, Antiochus VIII had Cleopatra Thea poisoned in 121 BC.

Antiochus IX Cyzicenus Antiochus IX Eusebes Cyzicenus

Antiochus IX Eusebes Cyzicenus was a ruler of the Hellenistic Seleucid kingdom. He was the son of Antiochus VII Sidetes and Cleopatra Thea. He left the kingdom in 129 BC and went to the city of Cyzicus, but he returned in 116 BC to challenge his half-brother Antiochus VIII for power.

Hasmonean dynasty Dynasty of Judean region (140–37 BCE)

The Hasmonean dynasty was a ruling dynasty of Judea and surrounding regions during classical antiquity, from c. 140 BCE to 37 BCE. Between c. 140 and c. 116 BCE the dynasty ruled Judea semi-autonomously from the Seleucid Empire, and from roughly 110 BCE, with the empire disintegrating, Judea gained full independence and expanded into the neighboring regions of Samaria, Galilee, Iturea, Perea, and Idumea. The Hasmonean rulers took the Greek title "basileus,, and some modern scholars refer to this period as an independent kingdom of Israel. The kingdom was ultimately conquered by the Roman Republic and the dynasty was displaced by Herod the Great in 37 BCE.

Cleopatra Selene of Syria Monarch of Syria

Cleopatra II Selene was the monarch of Syria from 82 to 69 BC. The daughter of Ptolemy VIII and Cleopatra III of Egypt, Cleopatra Selene was favoured by her mother and became a pawn in Cleopatra III's political manoeuvres. In 115 BC, Cleopatra III forced her son Ptolemy IX to divorce his sister-wife Cleopatra IV, and chose Cleopatra Selene as the new queen consort of Egypt. Tension between the king and his mother grew and ended with his expulsion from Egypt, leaving Cleopatra Selene behind; she probably then married the new king, her other brother Ptolemy X.

Nabataean Kingdom Ancient Arab Kingdom (3rd century BC - 106 AD)

The Nabataean Kingdom, also named Nabatea, was a political state of the Arab Nabataeans during classical antiquity.

Seleucid Dynastic Wars Wars of succession

The Seleucid Dynastic Wars were a series of wars of succession that were fought between competing branches of the Seleucid royal household for control of the Seleucid Empire. Beginning as a by-product of several succession crises that arose from the reigns of Seleucus IV Philopator and his brother Antiochus IV Epiphanes in the 170s and 160s, the wars typified the final years of the empire and were an important cause of its decline as a major power in the Near East and Hellenistic world. The last war ended with the collapse of the kingdom and its annexation by the Roman Republic in 63 BC.

Battle of Cana

The Battle of Cana was fought between Greek Seleucid under king Antiochus XII Dionysus of Syria, and the Arab Nabataean Kingdom. Cana is an unknown village; scholars place it somewhere south or southwest of the Dead Sea.

Battle of Gadara

Battle of Gadara was fought between the Judaean Hasmoneans and the Arab Nabataeans around 93 BC in Gadara in modern-day Jordan.

Antiochus, son of Seleucus IV King of Syria

Antiochus was a Hellenistic monarch of the Seleucid Empire reigning between 175 and 170 BC.



  1. Ross 1968, p. 47.
  2. 1 2 Hallo 1996, p.  142.
  3. Taylor 2013, p.  163.
  4. Downey 2015, p.  68.
  5. Bennett 2002, p. notes 11, 9.
  6. Kosmin 2014, p.  24.
  7. Otto & Bengtson 1938, pp. 103, 104.
  8. Wright 2012, p. 11.
  9. Kosmin 2014, p.  23.
  10. Ogden 1999, p. 153.
  11. Dumitru 2016, p. 260.
  12. Dumitru 2016, p. 258.
  13. Dumitru 2016, pp. 260, 263.
  14. Kosmin 2014, p.  243.
  15. Hoover 2007, p. 295.
  16. Dąbrowa 2010, p. 177.
  17. 1 2 Houghton 1987, p. 81.
  18. Whitehorne 1994, p. 169.
  19. Retso 2003, p.  342.
  20. Biers 1992, p. 13.
  21. McGing 2010, p.  247.
  22. 1 2 Hoover, Houghton & Veselý 2008, p. 212.
  23. Hoover, Houghton & Veselý 2008, p. 213.
  24. Ehling 2008, p. 247.
  25. Wright 2005, pp. 77, 78.
  26. Wright 2005, p. 81.
  27. Wright 2011, p. 46.
  28. 1 2 Bellinger 1949, p. 77.
  29. Newell 1939, p. 90.
  30. Schürer 1973, p.  124.
  31. Kindler 1978, p. 53.
  32. Newell 1939, pp. 90, 91.
  33. Mittmann 2006, pp. 25, 33.
  34. Fitzgerald 2004, p.  361, 362.
  35. Bar-Kochva 1996, p.  138.
  36. Mittmann 2006, p. 25.
  37. Fitzgerald 2004, p.  363.
  38. Mittmann 2006, p. 33.
  39. Mittmann 2006, p. 28, 33.
  40. Kasher 1988, p.  95.
  41. Avi-Yonah 2002, p. 69.
  42. Wright 2010, pp. 193, 199.
  43. Wright 2010, p. 198.
  44. Wright 2012, p. 15.
  45. Ceccarelli 2011, p. 171.
  46. Bevan 1902, p. 277.
  47. Gauger 2000, p. 190.
  48. Bevan 1902, p. 278.
  49. Ceccarelli 2011, p. 172.
  50. 1 2 Roschinski 1980, p. 143.
  51. 1 2 3 4 Shatzman 1991, p. 119.
  52. Bilkadi 1996, p. 107.
  53. 1 2 Fantalkin & Tal 2003, p. 109.
  54. 1 2 3 Roschinski 1980, p. 144.
  55. Retso 2003, p.  491.
  56. 1 2 Sartre 2005, p.  19.
  57. Chaniotis et al. 2007, p. 551.
  58. Bowersock 1971, p. 226.
  59. 1 2 3 Hoover, Houghton & Veselý 2008, p. 214.
  60. Dąbrowa 2003, p. 51.
  61. Josephus 1833, p.  422.
  62. Lorber & Iossif 2009, p. 112.
  63. Lorber & Iossif 2009, p. 104.
  64. Mittmann 2006, p. 31.
  65. 1 2 Fantalkin & Tal 2003, p. 108.
  66. 1 2 Stern 1981, p. 44.
  67. Stern 1987, p.  113.
  68. Atkinson 2012, p.  150.
  69. Fantalkin & Tal 2003, p. 119.
  70. 1 2 Atkinson 2011, p.  19.
  71. 1 2 3 Leeming & Leeming 2003, p.  122.
  72. Mittmann 2006, p. 32.
  73. Shatzman 1991, p. 124.
  74. Shatzman 1991, p. 120.
  75. Starcky 1966, p. 906.
  76. Hoover 2005, p. 99.
  77. Ogden 1999, p. 158.
  78. Scott 2017, p.  76.
  79. Malalas 1940, p. 19.
  80. Hoover 2011, p. 260.
  81. Hoover 2007, p. 294.
  82. 1 2 Wright 2012, p. 12.
  83. Burgess 2004, p. 21.
  84. Houghton, Lorber & Hoover 2008, p. 616.
  85. Burgess 2004, p. 24.
  86. Sievers 2005, p. 35.
  87. Downey 1938, p. 114.
  88. Whitby 1988, p. 270.
  89. Malalas 2017, p.  xxiv.
  90. Downey 1938, p. 112.
  91. Downey 1951, p. 161.
  92. Malalas 2009, p. 218.
  93. Malalas 2017, p.  109.
  94. Hoover 2007, p. 297.
  95. Bellinger 1949, p. 85.


  • Atkinson, Kenneth (2011). "The Historical Chronology of the Hasmonean Period in the War and Antiquities of Flavius Josephus: Separating Fact from Fiction". In Pastor, Jack; Stern, Pnina; Mor, Menaḥem (eds.). Flavius Josephus. Interpretation and History. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism. 146. Brill. ISBN   978-9-004-19126-6. ISSN   1384-2161.
  • Atkinson, Kenneth (2012). Queen Salome: Jerusalem's Warrior Monarch of the First Century B.C.E. McFarland&Company. ISBN   978-0-786-49073-8.
  • Avi-Yonah, Mikhaʼel (2002) [1977]. Rainey, Anson Frank (ed.). The Holy Land: a Historical Geography from the Persian to the Arab Conquest (536 B.C. to A.D. 640) (revised ed.). Carta. ISBN   978-9-652-20502-5.
  • Bar-Kochva, Bezalel (1996). Pseudo Hecataeus, "On the Jews": Legitimizing the Jewish Diaspora. Hellenistic Culture and Society. 21. University of California Press. ISBN   978-0-520-26884-5.
  • Bellinger, Alfred R. (1949). "The End of the Seleucids". Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences. Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences. 38. OCLC   4520682.
  • Bennett, Christopher J. (2002). "Tryphaena". C. J. Bennett. The Egyptian Royal Genealogy Project hosted by the Tyndale House Website. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  • Bevan, Edwyn Robert (1902). The House of Seleucus. II. London: Edward Arnold. OCLC   499314408.
  • Biers, William R. (1992). Art, Artefacts and Chronology in Classical Archaeology. Approaching the Ancient World. 2. Routledge. ISBN   978-0-415-06319-7.
  • Bilkadi, Zayn (1996). Babylon to Baku. Stanhope-Seta. ISBN   978-0-952-88160-5.
  • Bowersock, Glen Warren (1971). "A Report on Arabia Provincia". The Journal of Roman Studies. Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies. 61: 219–242. doi:10.2307/300018. ISSN   0075-4358. JSTOR   300018.
  • Burgess, Michael Roy (2004). "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress– The Rise and Fall of Cleopatra II Selene, Seleukid Queen of Syria". The Celator. Kerry K. Wetterstrom. 18 (3). ISSN   1048-0986.
  • Ceccarelli, Paola (2011). "Kings, Philosophers and Drunkards: Athenaeus' Information on the Seleucids". In Erickson, Kyle; Ramsey, Gillian (eds.). Seleucid Dissolution. The Sinking of the Anchor. Harrassowitz Verlag. ISBN   978-3-447-06588-7. ISSN   1613-5628.
  • Chaniotis, Angelos; Corsten, Thomas; Stroud, Ronald S.; Tybout, Rolf A., eds. (2007). "1907. Petra. Rock-Cut Dedication by a Panegyriarch (?), Late 2nd/3rd Cent. A.D.". Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum. Brill. LIII. ISBN   978-9-004-15630-2. ISSN   0920-8399.
  • Dąbrowa, Edward (2003). The Roman Near East and Armenia. Electrum: Journal of Ancient History. 7. Instytut Historii. Uniwersytet Jagielloński (Department of Ancient History at the Jagiellonian University). ISBN   978-8-323-31792-0. ISSN   1897-3426.
  • Dąbrowa, Edward (2010). "Demetrius III in Judea". Electrum. Instytut Historii. Uniwersytet Jagielloński. 18. ISSN   1897-3426.
  • Downey, Glanville (1938). "Seleucid Chronology in Malalas". American Journal of Archaeology. Archaeological Institute of America. 42 (1): 106–120. doi:10.2307/498832. ISSN   0002-9114. JSTOR   498832.
  • Downey, Glanville (1951). "The Occupation of Syria by the Romans". Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. The Johns Hopkins University Press. 82: 149–163. doi:10.2307/283427. ISSN   2325-9213. JSTOR   283427.
  • Downey, Robert Emory Glanville (2015) [1961]. A History of Antioch in Syria from Seleucus to the Arab Conquest. Princeton University Pres. ISBN   978-1-400-87773-7.
  • Dumitru, Adrian (2016). "Kleopatra Selene: A Look at the Moon and Her Bright Side". In Coşkun, Altay; McAuley, Alex (eds.). Seleukid Royal Women: Creation, Representation and Distortion of Hellenistic Queenship in the Seleukid Empire. Historia – Einzelschriften. 240. Franz Steiner Verlag. ISBN   978-3-515-11295-6. ISSN   0071-7665.
  • Ehling, Kay (2008). Untersuchungen Zur Geschichte Der Späten Seleukiden (164–63 v. Chr.) Vom Tode Antiochos IV. Bis Zur Einrichtung Der Provinz Syria Unter Pompeius . Historia – Einzelschriften (in German). 196. Franz Steiner Verlag. ISBN   978-3-515-09035-3. ISSN   0071-7665.
  • Fantalkin, Alexander; Tal, Oren (2003). "The 'Yannai Line' ( BJ I, 99–100; AJ XIII, 390–91): Reality or Fiction?". Palestine Exploration Quarterly. Routledge: on behalf of the Palestine Exploration Fund. 135 (2): 108–123. doi:10.1179/peq.2003.135.2.108. ISSN   0031-0328. S2CID   162414560.
  • Fitzgerald, John Thomas (2004). "Gadara: Philodemus' Native City". In Fitzgerald, John Thomas; Obbink, Dirk D.; Holland, Glenn Stanfield (eds.). Philodemus and the New Testament World. Supplements to Novum Testamentum. 111. Brill. ISBN   978-9-004-11460-9. ISSN   0167-9732.
  • Gauger, Jörg-Dieter (2000). Authentizität und Methode: Untersuchungen zum Historischen Wert des Persisch-Griechischen Herrscherbriefs in Literarischer Tradition. Studien zur Geschichtsforschung des Altertums (in German). 6. Verlag dr Kovač. ISBN   978-3-830-00107-2. ISSN   1435-6600.
  • Hallo, William W. (1996). Origins. The Ancient Near Eastern Background of Some Modern Western Institutions. Studies in the History and Culture of the Ancient Near East. 6. Brill. ISBN   978-90-04-10328-3. ISSN   0169-9024.
  • Hoover, Oliver D. (2000). "A Dedication to Aphrodite Epekoos for Demetrius I Soter and His Family". Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH. 131. ISSN   0084-5388.
  • Hoover, Oliver D. (2005). "Dethroning Seleucus VII Philometor (Cybiosactes): Epigraphical Arguments Against a Late Seleucid Monarch". Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH. 151. ISSN   0084-5388.
  • Hoover, Oliver D. (2007). "A Revised Chronology for the Late Seleucids at Antioch (121/0-64 BC)". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. Franz Steiner Verlag. 56 (3). ISSN   0018-2311.
  • Hoover, Oliver D.; Houghton, Arthur; Veselý, Petr (2008). "The Silver Mint of Damascus under Demetrius III and Antiochus XII (97/6 BC–83/2 BC)". American Journal of Numismatics. second. American Numismatic Society. 20. ISBN   978-0-89722-305-8. ISSN   1053-8356.
  • Hoover, Oliver D. (2011). "A Second Look at Production Quantification and Chronology in the Late Seleucid Period". In de Callataÿ, François (ed.). Time is money? Quantifying Monetary Supplies in Greco-Roman Times. Pragmateiai. 19. Edipuglia. ISBN   978-8-872-28599-2. ISSN   2531-5390.
  • Houghton, Arthur (1987). "The Double Portrait Coins of Antiochus XI and Philip I: a Seleucid Mint at Beroea?". Schweizerische Numismatische Rundschau. Schweizerischen Numismatischen Gesellschaft. 66. ISSN   0035-4163.
  • Houghton, Arthur; Lorber, Catherine; Hoover, Oliver D. (2008). Seleucid Coins, A Comprehensive Guide: Part 2, Seleucus IV through Antiochus XIII. 1. The American Numismatic Society. ISBN   978-0-980-23872-3.
  • Josephus (1833) [c. 94]. Burder, Samuel (ed.). The Genuine Works of Flavius Josephus, the Jewish Historian. Translated by Whiston, William. Kimber & Sharpless. OCLC   970897884.
  • Kasher, Aryeh (1988). Jews, Idumaeans, and Ancient Arabs: Relations of the Jews in Eretz-Israel with the Nations of the Frontier and the Desert During the Hellenistic and Roman Era (332 BCE–70 CE). Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum. 18. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). ISBN   978-3-161-45240-6. ISSN   0721-8753.
  • Kindler, Arie (1978). "Akko, A City of Many Names". Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. The American Schools of Oriental Research. 231 (231): 51–55. doi:10.2307/1356745. ISSN   0003-097X. JSTOR   1356745. S2CID   163682718.
  • Kosmin, Paul J. (2014). The Land of the Elephant Kings: Space, Territory, and Ideology in the Seleucid Empire. Harvard University Press. ISBN   978-0-674-72882-0.
  • Leeming, Henry; Leeming, Kate, eds. (2003). "Synoptic Comparison". Josephus' Jewish War and Its Slavonic Version: A Synoptic Comparison of the English Translation by H. St. J. Thackeray with the Critical Edition by N.A. Meščerskij of the Slavonic Version in the Vilna Manuscript Translated Into English by H. Leeming and L. Osinkina. Arbeiten Zur Geschichte Des Antiken Judentums Und Des Urchristentums. 46. Brill. ISBN   978-9-004-11438-8. ISSN   0169-734X.
  • Lorber, Catharine C.; Iossif, Panagiotis (2009). "Seleucid Campaign Beards". L'Antiquité Classique. l’asbl L’Antiquité Classique. 78. ISSN   0770-2817.
  • Malalas, John (1940) [c. 565]. Chronicle of John Malalas, Books VIII–XVIII. Translated from the Church Slavonic. Translated by Spinka, Matthew; Downey, Glanville. University of Chicago Press. OCLC   601122856.
  • Malalas, John (2009). Meier, Mischa; Drosihn, Claudia; Priwitzer, Stefan; Enderle, Katharina (eds.). Johannes Malalas: Weltchronik. Bibliothek der Griechischen Literatur (in German). 69. Translated by Thurn, Johannes; Meier, Mischa. Anton Hiersemann Verlag. ISBN   978-3-777-20911-1.
  • Malalas, John (2017) [1986]. Jeffreys, Elizabeth; Jeffreys, Michael; Scott, Roger (eds.). The Chronicle of John Malalas. Byzantina Australiensia. 4. Translated by Jeffreys, Elizabeth; Jeffreys, Michael; Scott, Roger; Croke, Brian; Ferber, Jenny; Franklin, Simon; James, Alan; Kelly, Douglas; Moffatt, Ann; Nixon, Ann; Parker, Brian; Witaboski, Witold. Brill. ISBN   978-0-959-36362-3.
  • McGing, Brian C. (2010). Polybius' Histories. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-199-71867-2.
  • Mittmann, Siegfried (2006). "Die Hellenistische Mauerinschrift von Gadara (Umm Qēs) und die Seleukidisch Dynastische Toponymie Palästinas". Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages (in German). Department of Ancient Studies: Stellenbosch University. 32 (2). ISSN   0259-0131.
  • Newell, Edward Theodore (1939). Late Seleucid Mints in Ake-Ptolemais and Damascus. Numismatic Notes & Monographs. 84. American Numismatic Society. OCLC   2461409.
  • Ogden, Daniel (1999). Polygamy, Prostitutes and Death: The Hellenistic Dynasties. Duckworth with the Classical Press of Wales. ISBN   978-0-715-62930-7.
  • Otto, Walter Gustav Albrecht; Bengtson, Hermann (1938). Zur Geschichte des Niederganges des Ptolemäerreiches: ein Beitrag zur Regierungszeit des 8. und des 9. Ptolemäers. Abhandlungen (Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse) (in German). 17. Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. OCLC   470076298.
  • Retso, Jan (2003). The Arabs in Antiquity: Their History from the Assyrians to the Umayyads. RoutledgeCurzon. ISBN   978-1-136-87282-2.
  • Roschinski, Hans Peter (1980). "Geschichte der Nabatäer". Bonner Jahrbücher (in German). Rheinland-Verlag Köln. In Kommission bei Rudolf Habelt Verlag GmbH Bonn. In Verbindung mit Verlag Butzon & Bercker Kevelaer Rhld. und Böhlau Verlag Köln-Wien. 180. ISSN   0938-9334.
  • Ross, Alan S. C. (1968). "Aldrediana XX: Notes on the Preterite-Present Verbs". English Philological Studies. W. Heffer & Sons, Ltd for the University of Birmingham. 11. ISSN   0308-0129.
  • Sartre, Maurice (2005). The Middle East Under Rome. Harvard University Press. ISBN   978-0-674-01683-5.
  • Schürer, Emil (1973) [1874]. Vermes, Geza; Millar, Fergus; Black, Matthew (eds.). The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ (175 B.C.–A.D. 135). II (2014 ed.). Bloomsbury T&T Clark. ISBN   978-0-567-29891-1.
  • Scott, Roger (2017) [1989]. "Malalas and his Contemporaries". In Jeffreys, Elizabeth; Croke, Brian; Scott, Roger (eds.). Studies in John Malalas. Byzantina Australiensia. 6. Brill. ISBN   978-9-004-34462-4.
  • Shatzman, Israel (1991). The Armies of the Hasmoneans and Herod: From Hellenistic to Roman Frameworks. Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum. 25. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). ISBN   978-3-161-45617-6. ISSN   0721-8753.
  • Sievers, Joseph (2005). "What's in a Name? Antiochus in Josephus' Bellum Judaicum". The Journal of Jewish Studies. Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies. 56 (1): 34–47. doi:10.18647/2582/JJS-2005. ISSN   0022-2097.
  • Starcky, Jean (1966). "Pétra et la Nabatène". Supplément au Dictionnaire de la Bible (in French). Editions-Librairie Letouzey & Ané. 7. OCLC   1010909134.
  • Stern, Menaḥem (1981). "Judea and her Neighbors in the Days of Alexander Jannaeus". The Jerusalem Cathedra: Studies in the History, Archaeology, Geography and Ethnography of the Land of Israel. Wayne State University Press. 1. ISSN   0333-7618.
  • Stern, Menaḥem (1987) [1976]. "The Jews in Greek and Latin Literature". In Safrai, Shmuel; Stern, Menaḥem; Flusser, David; van Unnik, Willem Cornelis (eds.). The Jewish People in the First Century, Volume 2. Historical Geography, Political History, Social, Cultural and Religious Life and Institutions. Compendia Rerum Iudaicarum ad Novum Testamentum. 2. Van Gorcum. ISBN   978-9-023-21436-6. ISSN   1877-4970.
  • Taylor, Michael J. (2013). Antiochus the Great. Pen and Sword. ISBN   978-1-848-84463-6.
  • Whitby, Michael (1988). "Malalas. The Chronicle of John Malalas. Trans. E. Jeffreys [and others]. (Byzantina Australiensia, 4.) Sydney: Australian Association for Byzantine Studies (with Melbourne University), 1986. pp. xli + 371". The Journal of Hellenic Studies. The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies. 108. doi:10.2307/632717. ISSN   0075-4269. JSTOR   632717.
  • Whitehorne, John (1994). Cleopatras. Routledge. ISBN   978-0-415-05806-3.
  • Wright, Nicholas L. (2005). "Seleucid Royal Cult, Indigenous Religious Traditions and Radiate Crowns: The Numismatic Evidence". Mediterranean Archaeology. Sydney University Press. 18. ISSN   1030-8482.
  • Wright, Nicholas L. (2010). "Non-Greek Religious Iconography on the Coinage of Seleucid Syria". Mediterranean Archaeology. Sydney University Press. 22/23. ISSN   1030-8482.
  • Wright, Nicholas L. (2011). "The Iconography of Succession Under the Late Seleukids". In Wright, Nicholas L. (ed.). Coins from Asia Minor and the East: Selections from the Colin E. Pitchfork Collection. The Numismatic Association of Australia. ISBN   978-0-646-55051-0.
  • Wright, Nicholas L. (2012). Divine Kings and Sacred Spaces: Power and Religion in Hellenistic Syria (301–64 BC). British Archaeological Reports (BAR) International Series. 2450. Archaeopress. ISBN   978-1-407-31054-1.
Antiochus XII Dionysus
Born: Unknown Died: 82 BC
Preceded by
Demetrius III
Philip I
King of Syria
87–82 BC
with Philip I (87–82 BC)
Succeeded by
Philip I
Antiochus XIII
Cleopatra Selene