Related Research Articles
Niklas Luhmann was a German sociologist, philosopher of social science, and a prominent thinker in systems theory, who is considered one of the most important social theorists of the 20th century.
Georg Simmel was a German sociologist, philosopher, and critic.
Karl Mannheim was an influential German sociologist during the first half of the 20th century. He is a key figure in classical sociology, as well as one of the founders of the sociology of knowledge. Mannheim is best known for his book Ideology and Utopia (1929/1936), in which he distinguishes between partial and total ideologies, the latter representing comprehensive worldviews distinctive to particular social groups, and also between ideologies that provide outdated support for existing social arrangements, and utopias, which look to the future and threaten to transform a society.
Ferdinand Tönnies was a German sociologist, economist and philosopher. He was a major contributor to sociological theory and field studies, best known for his distinction between two types of social groups, Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. He co-founded the German Society for Sociology alongside Max Weber and Georg Simmel and many other founders. He was president of the society from 1909 to 1934, after which he was ousted for having criticized the Nazis. Tönnies was considered the first German sociologist proper, published over 900 works and contributed to many areas of sociology and philosophy.
Robert Michels was a German-born Italian sociologist who contributed to elite theory by describing the political behavior of intellectual elites.
Verstehen, in the context of German philosophy and social sciences in general, has been used since the late 19th century – in English as in German – with the particular sense of the "interpretive or participatory" examination of social phenomena. The term is closely associated with the work of the German sociologist, Max Weber, whose antipositivism established an alternative to prior sociological positivism and economic determinism, rooted in the analysis of social action. In anthropology, verstehen has come to mean a systematic interpretive process in which an outside observer of a culture attempts to relate to it and understand others.
Gottfried Boehm is a German art historian and philosopher.
Alfred Vierkandt was a German sociologist, ethnographer, social psychologist, social philosopher and philosopher of history. He is known for a broad and phenomenological Gesellschaftslehre promulgated in the 1920s, and for his formal sociology.
Hans Sedlmayr was an Austrian art historian. From 1931 to 1932 and from 1938 onwards, he was a member of the Nazi Party.
Leo Kofler was an Austrian-German Marxist sociologist. He ranks with the Marburg politicologist Wolfgang Abendroth and the Frankfurt school theoreticians Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno among the few well-known Marxist intellectuals in post-war Germany. However, almost nothing of his work was ever translated into English, and he is therefore little known in the English-speaking world. Kofler had his own, distinctive interpretation of Marxism, which connected sociology and history with aesthetics and anthropology.
Alois Riegl was an Austrian art historian, and is considered a member of the Vienna School of Art History. He was one of the major figures in the establishment of art history as a self-sufficient academic discipline, and one of the most influential practitioners of formalism.
Albert Salomon was a German-Jewish sociologist. He was the nephew of Alice Salomon.
Julius Alwin Franz Georg Andreas Ritter von Schlosser was an Austrian art historian and an important member of the Vienna School of Art History. According to Ernst Gombrich, he was "One of the most distinguished personalities of art history".
The Budapest School was a school of thought, originally of Marxist humanism, but later of post-Marxism and dissident liberalism that emerged in Hungary in the early 1960s, belonging to so called Hungarian New Left. Its members were students or colleagues of Georg Lukács. The school was originally oriented towards developing Lukacs' later works on social ontology and aesthetics, but quickly began to challenge the paradigm of Lukacsian-Marxism, thus reconstructing contemporary critical theory. Most of the members later came to abandon Marxism. The school also critiqued the "dictatorship over needs" of the Soviet states. Most of the members were forced into exile by the pro-Soviet Hungarian government.
The Sonntagskreis was an intellectual discussion group in Budapest, Hungary, between 1915 and 1918. The main focus of the group was on the relationship between ideas and the social and historical context of those ideas, a line of thought that led towards the later concepts of "social history of art" and "sociology of knowledge.
György Lukács, also Georg Bernard Baron Lukács von Szegedin, was a Hungarian Marxist philosopher, aesthetician, literary historian, and critic. He was one of the founders of Western Marxism, an interpretive tradition that departed from the Marxist ideological orthodoxy of the Soviet Union. He developed the theory of reification, and contributed to Marxist theory with developments of Karl Marx's theory of class consciousness. He was also a philosopher of Leninism. He ideologically developed and organised Lenin's pragmatic revolutionary practices into the formal philosophy of vanguard-party revolution.
Alabert Fogarasi, also known as Béla Fogarasi was a Hungarian philosopher and politician.
Martin Warnke was a German art historian.
Anna Lesznai was a Hungarian-born American writer, painter, designer, and key figure in the Hungarian avant-garde.
M. Rainer Lepsius was a German sociologist. A particular interest was in the work of Max Weber: he was prominent among the co-compilers of the (eventually) 47 volume edition of the Complete Works of Weber.
References
- Harrington, Austin (2004). Art and social theory: sociological arguments in aesthetics. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 64–68. ISBN 0-7456-3038-3
- (in French) Alberto Tenenti: Hauser, Arnold: Art, histoire sociale et méthode sociologique. In: Annales. Economies, Societes, civilisations. Paris: 12(1957)3, S. 474–481.
- Zoltán Halász: In Arnold Hauser’s workshop. In: The new Hungarian quarterly. Budapest: 16(1975)58, p. 90–96.
- (in German) Ekkehard Mai: Kunst, Kunstwissenschaft und Soziologie. Zur Theorie und Methodendiskussion in Arnold Hausers „Soziologie der Kunst“. In: Das Kunstwerk. 1/1976, S. 3–10.
- (in German) Jürgen Scharfschwerdt: Arnold Hauser. In: Alphons Silbermann (Hrsg.): Klassiker der Kunstsoziologie . Beck, München 1979. S. 200–222.
- (in German) K.-J. Lebus: Eine sozialhistorische Sicht auf Kunst und Gesellschaft. (Annotation zur Herausgabe der Sozialgeschichte... im Verlag der Kunst, Dresden, 1987). In: Bildende Kunst. Berlin: 35(1988)12, p. 572.
- (in German) K.-J. Lebus: Zum Kunstkonzept Arnold Hausers. In: Weimarer Beiträge. Berlin 36 (1990) 6, p. 210–228. (online)
- Jim Berryman, “Gombrich’s Critique of Hauser’s Social History of Art,” History of European Ideas, vol. 43, no. 5, 2017, 494–506.
- Csilla Markója, “The young Arnold Hauser and the Sunday Circle - The publication of Hauser’s estate”, Journal of Art Historiography, 21, 2019, 1–20.
