Bow porcelain factory

Last updated

Bow parrot, c. 1760. The green and the crimson-purple on the base are two of Bow's distinctive colours. Parrot MET DP252735 (cropped).jpg
Bow parrot, c. 1760. The green and the crimson-purple on the base are two of Bow's distinctive colours.

The Bow porcelain factory (active c. 1747–64 and closed in 1776) was an emulative rival of the Chelsea porcelain factory in the manufacture of early soft-paste porcelain in Great Britain. The two London factories were the first in England. [1] It was originally located near Bow, in what is now the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, but by 1749 it had moved to "New Canton", sited east of the River Lea, and then in Essex, [2] now in the London Borough of Newham. [3]

Contents

Designs imitated imported Chinese and Japanese porcelains and the wares being produced at Chelsea, at the other end of London. From about 1753, Meissen figures were copied, both directly and indirectly through Chelsea. Quality was notoriously uneven; [4] the warm, creamy body of Bow porcelains is glassy and the glaze tends towards ivory. The paste included bone ash, [5] and Bow figures were made by pressing the paste into moulds, rather than the slipcasting used at Chelsea. [6] Bow appears to have been the largest English factory of its period. [7] After about 1760, quality declined, as more English factories opened, and the dependence on Chelsea models increased, perhaps aided by an influx of Chelsea workers after 1763, as production there decreased. [8]

Inkwell, inscribed "Made at New Canton 1750", one of about 40 dated pieces known. Inkwell, dated 1750, Bow factory, soft-paste porcelain with overglaze enamels, gold - Gardiner Museum, Toronto - DSC00663.JPG
Inkwell, inscribed "Made at New Canton 1750", one of about 40 dated pieces known.

Both Bow and Chelsea catered for the luxury end of the market. One of the earliest records is in the Pelham Papers, the private accounts of the Duchess of Newcastle, showing the Duchess 'Pd. For China made at Bowe £3.0.0.' [10] Bow also produced a good deal of cheaper sprigged tableware in white, with the relief decoration applied in strips after the main body is formed. There are blue and white porcelain tablewares with floral underglaze decoration imitating Chinese wares. [11] Japanese export porcelain in the Kakiemon style was popular at Bow, as at Chelsea and continental factories, especially a design featuring partridges for tableware. [12] The style of large bold "botanical" designs for flat pieces, derived from botanical book illustrations, were borrowed from Chelsea, and for smaller European flowers Bow had a distinctive style with similarities to French Mennecy-Villeroy porcelain that is "remarkably soft and delicate", though only seen on more expensive pieces. [13]

Wares

Stand for a tureen, c. 1755, in Bow's version of Kakiemon style. Tureen and Stand (Stand), c. 1755, Bow factory, soft-paste porcelain with overglaze enamels, gold - Gardiner Museum, Toronto - DSC00672.JPG
Stand for a tureen, c. 1755, in Bow's version of Kakiemon style.

The chaser and enamellist George Michael Moser, a key figure in the English Rococo and a founder of the Royal Academy, modelled for Bow, the sculptor Joseph Nollekens was told years later; [14] the sculptor John Bacon may have modelled for Bow in his youth. [15] The large white figure of the Farnese Flora, a high point in the Bow production, was taken, it has been suggested, from a terracotta by Michael Rysbrack.

A pair of Bow figures of Kitty Clive and Henry Woodward as "the Fine Lady" and 'the Fine Gentleman" in David Garrick's mythological burlesque Lethe, 1750–52 "are probably the earliest full-length portrait figures in English porcelain"; [16] Some figures bear the incised date 1750, the earliest dates on Bow porcelain. [17] Some were enamelled by William Duesbury. [18] Some Bow figures were imitated from Chelsea models, but many more from Meissen. The largest figures are of General James Wolfe and the Marquess of Granby, no doubt to celebrate their victories in the Seven Years' War, respectively in 1759 and 1760–62. Granby is 14 1/2 inches high. [19] Most factories copied from other porcelain, book illustrations for animals and plants, and prints for people, but a note in the Bowcocke papers to buy a partridge "dead or alive" suggests some modelling, or at least colouring, from real models was undertaken. [20]

Bow porcelain adopted the newly invented technique of transfer printing from Battersea enamels in the later 1750s, although it "was never well-established as a mode of decoration", and sometimes mixed with painting on a single piece. [21] As with other factories, some figures were apparently simply painted, rather than enamelled (followed by a second firing). The paint on these will normally have become damaged over the years, until the remainder was scraped off to give a plain white glazed figure. Duesbury's account book distinguishes between figures that are "painted" and "enhamild". [22]

History

A covered sauceboat, ca 1750, in a fully rococo style owing a debt to contemporary silver Bow sauceboat.jpg
A covered sauceboat, ca 1750, in a fully rococo style owing a debt to contemporary silver

Early patents applied for by Thomas Frye and his silent partner Edward Heylyn [23] in December 1744 (enrolled 1745) and a totally different patent of 1 November 1748 (enrolled March 1749), both apparently intended broadly to cover the uses of kaolin, [24] were traditionally believed not to have resulted in any actual manufacture before about 1749, though Frye's published epitaph claimed he was "the inventor and first manufacturer of porcelain in England." "Heylyn and Frye do not appear to have had a factory of their own, but probably carried on their experiments at a factory already existing at Bow, having first secured the services of a well-skilled workman whose name has not been preserved, and who may have been the real inventor of English porcelain," a writer noted in 1911. [25]

But although the scale of production hardly amounts to a successful commercial enterprise, in recent years scientific analysis of various pieces, some excavated, that do not fit the traditional narrative of the earliest days of English porcelain, have suggested to some researchers that not only was there earlier production of porcelain, but that one formula produced the earliest hard-paste porcelain made in England, some two decades before Plymouth porcelain. [26]

Busts of a "Mongolian" couple, c. 1750 A Mongolian man MET ES2027 (cropped).jpg
Busts of a "Mongolian" couple, c. 1750

The earliest Bow porcelains are of soft-paste incorporating bone ash, forming a phosphatic body that was a precursor of bone china. By 1749–1750 the business had moved from Bow to 'New Canton', a new factory on the Essex side of the River Lea, close to Bow Bridge, just west of Stratford High Street and beside Bow Back River. This move is evidenced by inkstands at the British Museum and at the Museum of Royal Worcester bearing the year 1750 and the inscription "Made at New Canton". [27] Another example in the Gardiner Museum, Toronto is illustrated here. Also by 1750 Frye was serving as manager of the factory, under new owners, John Crowther and Weatherby. In 1753 they were advertising in Birmingham for painters and a modeller. Sources for the early history of the Bow manufactory were collected by Lady Charlotte Guest in memoranda, diaries, and notebooks, including the diary, account books and other papers of John Bowcocke (d. 1765), who was employed in the works as a commercial manager and traveller. [28]

About 1758, the manufactory's high point, 300 persons were employed, 90 of whom were painters, all under one roof. "An account of the business returns for a period of five years shows that the cash receipts, which were £6,573 in 1750–51, increased steadily from year to year, and had reached £11,229 in 1755. The total amount of sales in 1754 realized £18,115." [29] The firm had a retail shop in Cornhill and a warehouse at St Katharine's near the Tower, though a West End shop that was opened in 1757 in the Terrace in St. James's Street closed the following year. The part-owner Weatherby died in 1762 and his partner Crowther was listed as bankrupt the following year. Three sales dispersed his effects in March and May 1764. Though Crowther continued in business in a small way, in 1776 what remained of the Bow factory was sold for a small sum to William Duesbury, and all the moulds and implements were transferred to Derby: see Chelsea porcelain factory.

There are hints in the history that much of the decoration, especially the overglaze enamelling, may have been done outside the factory, as was quite a common practice at this date. [30]

Newham's Heritage Service owns and curates a significant collection of items from the factory as well as from archaeological digs on the "New Canton" site in 1969. [31] The New Canton site was also excavated in 1867 (discovering kiln wasters which were tested by a chemist at the direction of Lady Charlotte Schreiber [32] ) whilst another dig occurred in 1921 on the opposite side of the High Street. [33]

Marks

No consistent factory marks were used at Bow, but there are a confusing number of marks that appear on some pieces or at some period, especially an anchor and dagger in the 1760s. [34] Various suggestions have been made as to the meaning of other marks and letters that sometimes appear, with attempts to relate them to the names of possible modellers and other theories. [35]

Notes

  1. Spero, 121
  2. Powell, W R, ed. (1973). "'West Ham: Industries', in A History of the County of Essex: Volume 6". British History Online. London: Victoria County History. pp. 76–89. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
  3. The two sites for the factory, now both swallowed by London, were in the 18th century firstly "Bow, Middlesex" and then "Stratford-le-Bow", Essex ("New Canton").
  4. Charles Truman, reviewing exhibitions of Bow porcelain in The Burlington Magazine124 No. 952 (July 1982), p. 465; J. V. G. Mallet: "The wares of Bow do not, even in the years of Frye's association with the factory, show much consistency either in design or in execution." Mallet 1984:238; Spero, 123.
  5. Honey, 82; Spero, 122
  6. Spero, 123
  7. Spero, 121–122
  8. Honey, 123–124; Spero, 123
  9. Spero, 123
  10. Anton., Gabszewicz (2000). Made at New Canton : Bow porcelain from the collection of the London Borough of Newham. English Ceramic Circle. London: English Ceramic Circle in association with the London Borough of Newham and the Newham Millennium Celebrations 2000 Committee. ISBN   0953510298. OCLC   44058298.
  11. Honey, 121–123
  12. Honey, 114–116
  13. Honey, 112
  14. J.T. Smith, Nollekens and his Times 1828; Honey, 106 is dubious.
  15. Honey, 106 is again dubious.
  16. J.V.G. Mallet in Rococo: Art and Design in Hogarth's England (London: Victorian and Albert Museum) 1984 (exhibition catalogue) O14 p 248. However, some of these figures are non-phosphatic (so not using bone), and may not be made at Bow. See Honey,
  17. (Rackham 1914:33).
  18. Duesbury's London account book, noted by Mallet 1983; Honey, 96–100.
  19. Honey, 108–110
  20. Honey, 110
  21. Honey, 116–121, 120 quoted
  22. Honey, 98–100
  23. Heylin, a merchant of the parish of Bow and freeholder of the land on which the "china works" were built, appears to have dropped out of active involvement in the venture at an early stage.
  24. The first discovery of China stone and china clay in Great Britain were made by William Cookworthy of Plymouth, and appeared in Cookworthy's Plymouth porcelain and Bristol porcelain.
  25. 'Industries: Pottery: Bow porcelain', A History of the County of Middlesex: Volume 2: General; Ashford, East Bedfont with Hatton, Feltham, Hampton with Hampton Wick, Hanworth, Laleham, Littleton (1911), pp. 146–50. Retrieved 17 May 2007.
  26. The Bow Porcelain Research Site, contains a comprehensive account of this line of research, including published papers.
  27. Bernard Rackham, "The Chronology of Bow Porcelain" The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs25 No. 133 (April 1914, pp. 33–35 + 38–40), p 33.
  28. Honey, 84. Other papers are in the British Museum, but those collected by Lady Charlotte Guest had been lost by 1977.
  29. A History... 1911
  30. Honey, 86–88, 123–124
  31. Site Map of Bow Porcelain Factory, from newhamstory.com Archived 16 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  32. Bernard Rackham, Catalogue of English Porcelain, Earthenware, Enamels and Glass collected by Charles Schreiber Esq., M.P., and the Lady Charlotte Elizabeth Schreiber, and presented to the Museum in 1884, Volume I, Porcelain. (London: Victoria and Albert Museum Department of Ceramics, 1928), cited at Fitzwilliam Museum: 'Columbine Dancing'
  33. Aubrey J. Toppin, "Bow Porcelain: Some Recent Excavations on the Site of the Factory" The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs40 No. 230 (May 1922), pp. 224 + 228–230 + 233.
  34. Spero, 123; Honey, 125
  35. Honey, throughout his chapter, especially 100–108, 125–126
  36. Metropolitan Museum of Art page: "These popular actors are represented in their roles in David Garrick's farce Lethe. The figure of Henry Woodward is modeled after his portrait by Francis Hayman (1708–1776) taken from a mezzotint by James McArdell (1728–1765). The figure of Kitty Clive (see 64.101.691) is modeled after an engraving of 1750 by Charles Mosley (1720–1770) taken from a drawing by Thomas Worlidge (1700–1766)."
  37. Compare a Chinese beaker of the previous century

Related Research Articles

<i>Kakiemon</i> Style of Japanese porcelain

Kakiemon is a style of Japanese porcelain, with overglaze decoration called "enameled" ceramics. It was originally produced at the factories around Arita, in Japan's Hizen province from the Edo period's mid-17th century onwards. The quality of its decoration was highly prized in the West and widely imitated by major European porcelain manufacturers during the Rococo period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Famille rose</span>

Famille rose is a type of Chinese porcelain introduced in the 18th century and defined by pink overglaze enamel. It is a Western classification for Qing dynasty porcelain known in Chinese by various terms: fencai, ruancai, yangcai, and falangcai. The colour palette is thought to have been brought to China during the reign of Kangxi (1654–1722) by Western Jesuits who worked at the palace, but perfected only in the Yongzheng era when the finest pieces were made, and famille rose ware reached the peak of its technical excellence during the Qianlong period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soft-paste porcelain</span> Porcelain material consisting of clay and other materials

Soft-paste porcelain is a type of ceramic material in pottery, usually accepted as a type of porcelain. It is weaker than "true" hard-paste porcelain, and does not require either its high firing temperatures or special mineral ingredients. There are many types, using a range of materials. The material originated in the attempts by many European potters to replicate hard-paste Chinese export porcelain, especially in the 18th century, and the best versions match hard-paste in whiteness and translucency, but not in strength. But the look and feel of the material can be highly attractive, and it can take painted decoration very well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chelsea porcelain factory</span> Porcelain manufactory in London, England

Chelsea porcelain is the porcelain made by the Chelsea porcelain manufactory, the first important porcelain manufactory in England, established around 1743–45, and operating independently until 1770, when it was merged with Derby porcelain. It made soft-paste porcelain throughout its history, though there were several changes in the "body" material and glaze used. Its wares were aimed at a luxury market, and its site in Chelsea, London, was close to the fashionable Ranelagh Gardens pleasure ground, opened in 1742.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biscuit porcelain</span> Unglazed white porcelain

Biscuit porcelain, bisque porcelain or bisque is unglazed, white porcelain treated as a final product, with a matte appearance and texture to the touch. It has been widely used in European pottery, mainly for sculptural and decorative objects that are not tableware and so do not need a glaze for protection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hausmaler</span>

In pottery hausmaler is a term for the artist, the style, and the pieces in hausmalerei, the process of buying pieces of pottery as plain "blanks", and then painting them in small workshops, or the homes of painters, before a final firing. In European pottery of the 17th to 19th centuries this was at certain times and places a significant part of production, and the decoration could be of very high quality. In England this was referred to as "outside decoration" and was also very important in the 18th and early 19th century, with some revival in the 20th.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transfer printing</span>

Transfer printing is a method of decorating pottery or other materials using an engraved copper or steel plate from which a monochrome print on paper is taken which is then transferred by pressing onto the ceramic piece. Pottery decorated using this technique is known as transferware or transfer ware.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Royal Crown Derby</span> English porcelain manufacturer

The Royal Crown Derby Porcelain Company is the oldest or second oldest remaining English porcelain manufacturer, based in Derby, England. The company, particularly known for its high-quality bone china, having produced tableware and ornamental items since approximately 1750. It was known as 'Derby Porcelain' until 1773, when it became 'Crown Derby', the 'Royal' being added in 1890.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meissen porcelain</span> First European hard-paste porcelain

Meissen porcelain or Meissen china was the first European hard-paste porcelain. Early experiments were done in 1708 by Ehrenfried Walther von Tschirnhaus. After his death that October, Johann Friedrich Böttger continued von Tschirnhaus's work and brought this type of porcelain to the market, financed by Augustus the Strong, King of Poland and Elector of Saxony. The production of porcelain in the royal factory at Meissen, near Dresden, started in 1710 and attracted artists and artisans to establish, arguably, the most famous porcelain manufacturer known throughout the world. Its signature logo, the crossed swords, was introduced in 1720 to protect its production; the mark of the swords is reportedly one of the oldest trademarks in existence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plymouth porcelain</span>

Plymouth porcelain was the first English hard paste porcelain, made in the county of Devon from 1768 to 1770. After two years in Plymouth the factory moved to Bristol in 1770, where it operated until 1781, when it was sold and moved to Staffordshire as the nucleus of New Hall porcelain, which operated until 1835. The Plymouth factory was founded by William Cookworthy. The porcelain factories at Plymouth and Bristol were among the earliest English manufacturers of porcelain, and the first to produce the hard-paste porcelain produced in China and the German factories led by Meissen porcelain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liverpool porcelain</span>

Liverpool porcelain is mostly of the soft-paste porcelain type and was produced between about 1754 and 1804 in various factories in Liverpool. Tin-glazed English delftware had been produced in Liverpool from at least 1710 at numerous potteries, but some then switched to making porcelain. A portion of the output was exported, mainly to North America and the Caribbean.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bristol porcelain</span>

Bristol porcelain covers porcelain made in Bristol, England by several companies in the 18th and 19th centuries. The plain term "Bristol porcelain" is most likely to refer to the factory moved from Plymouth in 1770, the second Bristol factory. The product of the earliest factory is usually called Lund's Bristol ware and was made from about 1750 until 1752, when the operation was merged with Worcester porcelain; this was soft-paste porcelain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Frye</span> English painter (c.1710–1762)

Thomas Frye was an Anglo-Irish artist, best known for his portraits in oil and pastel, including some miniatures and his early mezzotint engravings. He was also the patentee of the Bow porcelain factory, London, and claimed in his epitaph to be "the inventor and first manufacturer of porcelain in England," though his rivals at the Chelsea porcelain factory seem to have preceded him in bringing wares to market. The Bow porcelain works did not long survive Frye's death; their final auctions took place in May 1764.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Duesbury</span> English painter

William Duesbury (1725–1786) was an English enameller, in the sense of a painter of porcelain, who became an important porcelain entrepreneur, founder of the Royal Crown Derby and owner of porcelain factories at Bow, Chelsea, Derby and Longton Hall.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chantilly porcelain</span>

Chantilly porcelain is French soft-paste porcelain produced between 1730 and 1800 by the manufactory of Chantilly in Oise, France. The wares are usually divided into three periods, 1730–1751, 1751–1760, and a gradual decline from 1760 to 1800.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Derby Porcelain</span>

The production of Derby porcelain dates from the second half of the 18th century, although the authorship and the exact start of the production remains today as a matter of conjecture. The oldest remaining pieces in the late 19th century bore only the words "Darby" and "Darbishire" and the years 1751-2-3 as proof of place and year of manufacture. More important is the fact that the production of porcelain in Derby predates the commencement of the works of William Duesbury, started in 1756 when he joined Andrew Planche and John Heath to create the Nottingham Road factory, which later became the Royal Crown Derby.。

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrew Planche</span>

André or Andrew Planché, or Planchè, was a jeweller, potter and theatre person, son of French Huguenot refugees. He lived in Derby, where he had at least four children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coalport porcelain</span>

Coalport, Shropshire, England was a centre of porcelain and pottery production between about 1795 and 1926, with the Coalport porcelain brand continuing to be used up to the present. The opening in 1792 of the Coalport Canal, which joins the River Severn at Coalport, had increased the attractiveness of the site, and from 1800 until a merger in 1814 there were two factories operating, one on each side of the canal, making rather similar wares which are now often difficult to tell apart.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">China painting</span> Art of painting on ceramics

China painting, or porcelain painting, is the decoration of glazed porcelain objects, such as plates, bowls, vases or statues. The body of the object may be hard-paste porcelain, developed in China in the 7th or 8th century, or soft-paste porcelain, developed in 18th-century Europe. The broader term ceramic painting includes painted decoration on lead-glazed earthenware such as creamware or tin-glazed pottery such as maiolica or faience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lowestoft Porcelain Factory</span> English porcelain factory in operation 1757-1802

The Lowestoft Porcelain Factory was a soft-paste porcelain factory on Crown Street in Lowestoft, Suffolk, England, which was active from 1757 to 1802. It mostly produced "useful wares" such as pots, teapots, and jugs, with shapes copied from silverwork or from Bow and Worcester porcelain. The factory, built on the site of an existing pottery or brick kiln, was later used as a brewery and malt kiln. Most of its remaining buildings were demolished in 1955.

References