Caning of Charles Sumner

Last updated
Preston Brooks-SC2 crop.jpg
Charles Sumner - Brady-Handy.jpg
Representative Preston Brooks (left) brutally beat Senator Charles Sumner after Sumner gave a fiery speech attacking slavery and its practitioners, including Brooks' cousin Andrew Butler

The Caning of Charles Sumner, or the Brooks–Sumner Affair, occurred on May 22, 1856, in the United States Senate, when Representative Preston Brooks, a pro-slavery Democrat from South Carolina, used a walking cane to attack Senator Charles Sumner, an abolitionist Republican from Massachusetts, in retaliation for a speech given by Sumner two days earlier in which he fiercely criticized slaveholders, including a relative of Brooks. The beating nearly killed Sumner and it contributed significantly to the country's polarization over the issue of slavery. It has been considered symbolic of the "breakdown of reasoned discourse" [1] and the use of violence that eventually led to the Civil War.



In 1856, during the "Bleeding Kansas" crisis, Sumner denounced the Kansas–Nebraska Act in his "Crime against Kansas" speech, delivered on May 19 and May 20. The long speech argued for the immediate admission of Kansas as a free state and went on to denounce the "Slave Power"—the political arm of the slave owners:

Not in any common lust for power did this uncommon tragedy have its origin. It is the rape of a virgin Territory, compelling it to the hateful embrace of slavery; and it may be clearly traced to a depraved desire for a new Slave State, hideous offspring of such a crime, in the hope of adding to the power of slavery in the National Government. [2]

Sumner then attacked the authors of the Act, Senators Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois and Andrew Butler of South Carolina, saying,

The senator from South Carolina has read many books of chivalry, and believes himself a chivalrous knight with sentiments of honor and courage. Of course he has chosen a mistress to whom he has made his vows, and who, though ugly to others, is always lovely to him; though polluted in the sight of the world, is chaste in his sight—I mean the harlot, slavery. For her his tongue is always profuse in words. Let her be impeached in character, or any proposition made to shut her out from the extension of her wantonness, and no extravagance of manner or hardihood of assertion is then too great for this senator.

Sumner was alluding that Butler was Don Quixote and slavery was his Dulcinea. [3] In addition, Sumner mocked Butler's speaking ability, which had been impeded by a recent stroke:

[He] touches nothing which he does not disfigure with error, sometimes of principle, sometimes of fact. He cannot open his mouth, but out there flies a blunder. [4]

According to Manisha Sinha (2003), Sumner had been ridiculed and insulted by both Douglas and Butler for his opposition to the Fugitive Slave Law and the Kansas-Nebraska Act, with Butler crudely race-baiting Sumner by making sexual allusions to black women, like many slaveholders who accused abolitionists of promoting interracial marriage. [5]

Sexually charged accusations were also part of the abolitionist lexicon. According to Hoffer (2010), "It is also important to note the sexual imagery that recurred throughout the (Sumner's) oration, which was neither accidental nor without precedent. Abolitionists routinely accused slaveholders of maintaining slavery so that they could engage in forcible sexual relations with their slaves." [6] Douglas said during the speech that "this damn fool is going to get himself killed by some other damn fool." [7]

Representative Preston Brooks, Butler's cousin, was infuriated. He later said that he intended to challenge Sumner to a duel, and consulted with fellow South Carolina Representative Laurence M. Keitt on dueling etiquette. Keitt told him that dueling was for gentlemen of equal social standing, and that Sumner was no better than a drunkard, due to the supposedly coarse language he had used during his speech. Brooks said that he concluded that since Sumner was no gentleman, he did not merit honorable treatment; to Keitt and Brooks, it was more appropriate to humiliate Sumner by beating him with a cane in a public setting. [8]

Day of the attack

Congressman Laurence Keitt advised Brooks and was with him when he assaulted Sumner Laurence M. Keitt cph.3a02077.jpg
Congressman Laurence Keitt advised Brooks and was with him when he assaulted Sumner

Two days later, on the afternoon of May 22, Brooks entered the Senate chamber with Keitt and another ally, Congressman Henry A. Edmundson. They waited for the galleries to clear, being particularly concerned that there be no ladies present to witness what Brooks intended to do. [9] He confronted Sumner as he sat writing at his desk in the almost empty Senate chamber. "Mr. Sumner, I have read your speech twice over carefully. It is a libel on South Carolina, and Mr. Butler, who is a relative of mine," Brooks calmly announced in a low voice. As Sumner began to stand up, Brooks beat Sumner severely on the head before he could reach his feet, using a thick gutta-percha cane with a gold head. The force of the blows so shocked Sumner that he lost his sight immediately. "I no longer saw my assailant, nor any other person or object in the room. What I did afterwards was done almost unconsciously, acting under the instincts of self-defense," he recalled later. [10]

Congressman Henry A. Edmundson also advised Brooks and was with him during the assault on Sumner HenryAEdmundson.jpg
Congressman Henry A. Edmundson also advised Brooks and was with him during the assault on Sumner
Lithograph of Preston Brooks' 1856 attack on Sumner; the artist depicts the faceless assailant bludgeoning Sumner Southern Chivalry.jpg
Lithograph of Preston Brooks' 1856 attack on Sumner; the artist depicts the faceless assailant bludgeoning Sumner

Sumner was knocked down and trapped under the heavy desk, which was bolted to the floor. His chair, which was pulled up to his desk, moved back and forth on a track; Sumner either could not or did not think to slide his chair back to escape, so it pinned him under his desk. Brooks continued to strike Sumner until Sumner rose to his feet and ripped the desk from the floor in an effort to get away from Brooks. [11] By this time, Sumner was blinded by his own blood. He staggered up the aisle and, arms outstretched, vainly attempted to defend himself. But then he was an even larger and easier target for Brooks, who continued to beat him across the head, face, and shoulders "to the full extent of [my] power." Brooks didn't stop when his cane snapped; he continued thrashing Sumner with the piece which held the gold head. Sumner stumbled and reeled convulsively, "Oh Lord," he gasped "Oh! Oh!" Near the end of the attack, Sumner collapsed unconscious, although shortly before he succumbed he "bellowed like a calf" according to Brooks. Brooks grabbed the falling Sumner, held him up by the lapel with one hand, and continued to lash out at him with the cane in the other. [12] [13] Several other Senators and Representatives attempted to help Sumner, but were blocked by Edmundson, who yelled at the spectators to leave Brooks and Sumner alone, [14] and Keitt, who brandished his own cane and a pistol, and shouted, "Let them be!" and "Let them alone, God damn you, let them alone!" [15] [16] [17]

Senator John J. Crittenden attempted to intervene, and pleaded with Brooks not to kill Sumner. Senator Robert Toombs then interceded for Crittenden, telling Keitt not to attack someone who was not a party to the dispute, though Toombs also indicated later that he had no issue with Brooks beating Sumner, and in fact approved of it. [18]

Representatives Ambrose S. Murray and Edwin B. Morgan were finally able to intervene and restrain Brooks, at which point he quietly left the chamber. [19] Murray obtained the aid of a Senate page and the Sergeant at Arms, Dunning R. McNair. [20] As Sumner regained consciousness they were able to assist him to walk to a cloakroom. [21] Sumner received medical attention, including several stitches. [22] With the aid of Nathaniel P. Banks, the Speaker of the House, and Senator Henry Wilson, Sumner was able to travel by carriage to his lodgings, where he received further medical treatment. [23] Brooks also required medical attention before leaving the Capitol; he had hit himself above his right eye with one of his backswings. [24]

The cane Brooks used was broken into several pieces, which he left on the blood-soaked floor of the Senate chamber. Some, including the cane's gold head, were recovered by Edmundson, who gave the portion with the head to Adam John Glossbrenner, the House Sergeant at Arms. [25] [26] This portion of the cane eventually ended up at the Old State House Museum in Boston; it was worked to smooth the edges and finish, and then put on display. [27] Southern lawmakers made rings out of the other pieces Edmundson recovered from the Senate floor, which they wore on neck chains to show their solidarity with Brooks, who boasted "[The pieces of my cane] are begged for as sacred relics." [28]


The walking cane used to attack Charles Sumner on exhibit at the Old State House in Boston Walking cane used to assault Senator Charles Summner, May 1856 - Old State House Museum, Boston, MA - IMG 6685.JPG
The walking cane used to attack Charles Sumner on exhibit at the Old State House in Boston

The episode revealed the polarization in America, which had now reached the floor of the Senate. Sumner became a martyr in the North and Brooks a hero in the South. Northerners were outraged. The Cincinnati Gazette said, "The South cannot tolerate free speech anywhere, and would stifle it in Washington with the bludgeon and the bowie-knife, as they are now trying to stifle it in Kansas by massacre, rapine, and murder." [29] William Cullen Bryant of the New York Evening Post, asked, "Has it come to this, that we must speak with bated breath in the presence of our Southern masters?... Are we to be chastised as they chastise their slaves? Are we too, slaves, slaves for life, a target for their brutal blows, when we do not comport ourselves to please them?" [30] Thousands attended rallies in support of Sumner in Boston, Albany, Cleveland, Detroit, New Haven, New York, and Providence. More than a million copies of Sumner's speech were distributed. Two weeks after the caning, Ralph Waldo Emerson described the divide the incident represented: "I do not see how a barbarous community and a civilized community can constitute one state. I think we must get rid of slavery, or we must get rid of freedom." [31]

Conversely, Brooks was praised by Southern newspapers. The Richmond Enquirer editorialized that Sumner should be caned "every morning", praising the attack as "good in conception, better in execution, and best of all in consequences" and denounced "these vulgar abolitionists in the Senate" who "have been suffered to run too long without collars. They must be lashed into submission." Southerners sent Brooks hundreds of new canes in endorsement of his assault. One was inscribed "Hit him again." [32]

Representative Anson Burlingame publicly humiliated Brooks by goading him into challenging Burlingame to a duel, only to set conditions designed to intimidate Brooks into backing down. (As the challenged party, Burlingame, who was a crack shot, had the choice of weapons and dueling ground. He selected rifles on the Canada side of Niagara Falls, where U.S. anti-dueling laws would not apply. Brooks withdrew his challenge, claiming that he did not want to expose himself to the risk of violence by traveling through Northern states to get to Niagara Falls.) [33]

Brooks also threatened Senator Henry Wilson, Sumner's colleague from Massachusetts. Wilson called the beating by Brooks "brutal, murderous, and cowardly," and in response Brooks challenged Wilson to a duel. [34] Wilson declined, saying that he could not legally or by personal conviction participate, and calling dueling "the lingering relic of a barbarous civilization." [35] In reference to a rumor that Brooks might attack him in the Senate, Wilson told the press "I have sought no controversy, and I seek none, but I shall go where duty requires, uninfluenced by threats of any kind." [36] Wilson continued to perform his Senate duties, and Brooks did not make good on his threat. [37]

Historian William Gienapp has concluded that Brooks' "assault was of critical importance in transforming the struggling Republican party into a major political force." [38]

Southerners mocked Sumner, claiming he was faking his injuries. [39] They argued that the cane Brooks used was not heavy enough to inflict severe injuries. [40] They also claimed that Brooks had not hit Sumner more than a few times, and had not hit him hard enough to cause serious health concerns. [41] In fact, Sumner suffered head trauma that caused him chronic, debilitating pain for the rest of his life and symptoms consistent with what is now called traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder; he spent three years convalescing before returning to his Senate seat. [42]

Brooks claimed that he had not intended to kill Sumner, or else he would have used a different weapon. [43] In a speech to the House defending his actions, Brooks stated that he "meant no disrespect to the Senate of the United States" or the House by his attack on Sumner. [44] Brooks was arrested for the assault. [45] He was tried in a District of Columbia court, convicted, and fined $300 ($8,540 in today's dollars), but received no prison sentence. [46] A motion for Brooks' expulsion from the House failed, but he resigned on July 15 in order to permit his constituents to ratify or condemn his conduct via a special election. [47] They approved; Brooks was quickly returned to office after the August 1 vote, [48] and then re-elected to a new term of office later in 1856, [49] but he died of croup before the new term began. [50]

Keitt was censured by the House. [51] He resigned in protest, but his constituents ratified his conduct by overwhelmingly reelecting him to his seat within a month. [52] In 1858, he attempted to choke Representative Galusha Grow of Pennsylvania (Republican) for calling him a "negro driver" during an argument on the House floor. [53]

An effort to censure Edmundson failed to obtain a majority of votes in the House. [54]

In the 1856 elections, the new Republican Party made gains by use of the twin messages of "Bleeding Kansas" and "Bleeding Sumner", [55] because both events served to paint pro-slavery Democrats as extremists. [56] Though the Democrats won the presidential election and increased their majority in the House of Representatives because the Constitution's requirement to count slaves for purposes of apportioning Congressional districts and the Electoral College gave Democrats an advantage, Republicans made dramatic gains in elections for the state legislatures, which enabled them to make gains in the U.S. Senate elections, because senators were chosen by the state legislatures. [57] The violence in Kansas and the beating of Sumner helped the Republicans coalesce and cohere as a party, which set the stage for their victory in the 1860 presidential election. [58]

During the 1856 lame duck session of Congress, Brooks made a speech calling for the admission of Kansas "even with a constitution rejecting slavery". His conciliatory tone impressed Northerners and disappointed slavery's supporters. [59] [60]

Related Research Articles

David Rice Atchison United States Senator from Missouri

David Rice Atchison was a mid-19th century Democratic United States Senator from Missouri. He served as President pro tempore of the United States Senate for six years. Atchison served as a major general in the Missouri State Militia in 1838 during Missouri's Mormon War and as a Confederate brigadier general during the American Civil War under Major General Sterling Price in the Missouri Home Guard. He is best known for the claim that for 24 hours—Sunday, March 4, 1849 through noon on Monday—he may have been Acting President of the United States. This belief, however, is dismissed by nearly all historians, scholars, and biographers.

Henry Wilson 19th-century American Vice-President, politician, and general

Henry Wilson was the 18th vice president of the United States (1873–75) and a senator from Massachusetts (1855–73). Before and during the American Civil War, he was a leading Republican, and a strong opponent of slavery. Wilson devoted his energies to the destruction of the "Slave Power" – the faction of slave owners and their political allies which anti-slavery Americans saw as dominating the country.

Robert Toombs American politician

Robert Augustus Toombs was an American lawyer, planter, and politician from Georgia who became one of the organizers of the Confederacy and served as its first Secretary of State. He served in Jefferson Davis' cabinet as well as in the Confederate States Army, but later became one of Davis' critics. He fled the United States after the Confederate defeat, returning in 1867 after his daughter's death. He regained political power in Georgia as Congressional Reconstruction ended.

Free Soil Party Precursor to the US Republican Party

The Free Soil Party was a short-lived coalition political party in the United States active from 1848 to 1854, when it merged into the Republican Party. The party was largely focused on the single issue of opposing the expansion of slavery into the western territories of the United States.

Anson Burlingame American politician, minister to China, and Chinas envoy to U.S. and European nations

Anson Burlingame was an American lawyer, Republican/American Party legislator, diplomat, and abolitionist. As diplomat, he served as the U.S. minister to China (1862-1867) and then as China's envoy to the U.S., which resulted in the 1868 landmark Burlingame Treaty.

Charles Sumner American abolitionist and politician

Charles Sumner was an American politician and United States Senator from Massachusetts. As an academic lawyer and a powerful orator, Sumner was the leader of the anti-slavery forces in the state and a leader of the Radical Republicans in the U.S. Senate during the American Civil War. During Reconstruction, he fought to minimize the power of the ex-Confederates and guarantee equal rights to the freedmen. He fell into a dispute with fellow Republican President Grant over the control of Santo Domingo leading to the stripping of his power in the Senate and his subsequent effort to defeat Grant's re-election.

The Radical Republicans were a faction of American politicians within the Republican Party of the United States from around 1854 until the end of Reconstruction in 1877. They called themselves "Radicals," with a goal of immediate, complete, permanent eradication of slavery, without compromise. They were opposed during the War by the moderate Republicans, and by the pro-slavery and anti-Reconstruction Democratic Party as well as liberals in the North during Reconstruction. Radicals led efforts after the war to establish civil rights for former slaves and fully implement emancipation. After weaker measures in 1866 resulted in violence against former slaves in the rebel states, Radicals pushed the Fourteenth Amendment and statutory protections through Congress. They disfavored allowing ex-Confederate officers to retake political power in the South, and emphasized equality, civil rights and voting rights for the "freedmen," i.e. people who had been enslaved by state slavery laws within the United States.

Bleeding Kansas Violent political confrontations in the United States centered around slavery

Bleeding Kansas, Bloody Kansas, or the Border War was a series of violent civil confrontations in the United States between 1854 and 1861 which emerged from a political and ideological debate over the legality of slavery in the proposed state of Kansas. The conflict was characterized by years of electoral fraud, raids, assaults, and retributive murders carried out in Kansas and neighboring Missouri by pro-slavery "Border Ruffians" and anti-slavery "Free-Staters".

Preston Brooks American politician

Preston Smith Brooks was an American politician and Member of the U.S. House of Representatives from South Carolina, serving from 1853 until his resignation in July 1856 and again from August 1856 until his death.

Andrew Butler American senator

Andrew Pickens Butler was a United States Senator from South Carolina who authored the Kansas-Nebraska Act with Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois.

Pottawatomie massacre Violent Attack by Abolitionists during the American Civil War

The Pottawatomie massacre occurred during the night of May 24 and the morning of May 25, 1856. In reaction to the sacking of Lawrence, Kansas by pro-slavery forces, John Brown and a band of abolitionist settlers—some of them members of the Pottawatomie Rifles—killed five pro-slavery settlers north of Pottawatomie Creek in Franklin County, Kansas. This was one of the many violent episodes in Kansas preceding the American Civil War, which came to be known collectively as Bleeding Kansas. Bleeding Kansas involved conflicts between pro- and anti-slavery settlers over whether Kansas Territory would enter the Union as a slave state or free state.

Laurence M. Keitt American politician

Laurence Massillon Keitt was an American planter, lawyer, politician, and soldier from South Carolina. During his tenure in the United States House of Representatives, he was included in several lists of Fire-Eaters—men who adamantly urged the secession of southern states from the United States, and who resisted measures of compromise and reconciliation, leading to the American Civil War.

34th United States Congress

The Thirty-fourth United States Congress was a meeting of the legislative branch of the United States federal government, consisting of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. It met in Washington, D.C., from March 4, 1855, to March 4, 1857, during the last two years of Franklin Pierce's presidency. The apportionment of seats in the House of Representatives was based on the Seventh Census of the United States in 1850. The Whig Party, one of the two major parties of the era, had largely collapsed, although many former Whigs ran as Republicans or as members of the "Opposition Party." The Senate had a Democratic majority, and the House was controlled by a coalition of Representatives led by Nathaniel P. Banks, a member of the American Party.

Martin Franklin Conway was a U.S. congressman, consul to France, abolitionist, and advocate of the Free-State movement in Kansas.

Legislative violence Violence in legislative bodies

Legislative violence broadly refers to any violent clashes between members of a legislature, often physically, inside the legislature and triggered by divisive issues and tight votes. Such clashes have occurred in many countries across time, and notable incidents still regularly occur.

Battle of Black Jack United States historic place

The Battle of Black Jack took place on June 2, 1856, when anti-slavery forces, led by the noted abolitionist John Brown, attacked the encampment of Henry C. Pate near Baldwin City, Kansas. The battle is cited as one incident of "Bleeding Kansas" and a contributing factor leading up to the American Civil War of 1861 to 1865.

Henry A. Edmundson American politician and Confederate Army officer

Henry Alonzo Edmundson was a nineteenth-century Virginia lawyer, congressman, farmer, slaveowner and Confederate officer.

Ambrose S. Murray American politician

Ambrose Spencer Murray was an American businessman and politician from New York. He is best known for his service as a U.S. Representative from New York.

1856 in the United States included some significant events that pushed the nation closer towards civil war.

The 1857 United States Senate election in Massachusetts was held in January 1857. Incumbent Charles Sumner was re-elected to a second term in office as a member of the Republican Party. Sumner was narrowly elected by a coalition of Free-Soil and Democratic legislators in 1851. He had since become a founding member of the Massachusetts Republican Party.


  1. "The Caning of Senator Charles Sumner". United States Senate . Retrieved February 15, 2013.
  2. Pfau, Michael William (2003). "Time, Tropes, and Textuality: Reading Republicanism in Charles Sumner's 'Crime Against Kansas". Rhetoric & Public Affairs. 6 (3): 385–413, quote on p. 393. doi:10.1353/rap.2003.0070.
  3. Davis, Kenneth (1996–2011). Don't know much about the Civil War: everything you need to know about America's greatest conflict but never learned. New York: Harper. OCLC   33948054.CS1 maint: date format (link)
  4. Hendrix, Pat (2006). Murder and Mayhem in the Holy City. Charleston, SC: History Press. p. 50. ISBN   978-1-59629-162-1 via Google Books.
  5. Sinha, Manisha (Summer 2003). "The Caning of Charles Sumner: Slavery, Race and Ideology in the Age of the Civil War". Journal of the Early Republic. 23 (2): 233–262. doi:10.2307/3125037. JSTOR   3125037.
  6. Hoffer, Williamjames Hull (2010). The Caning of Charles Sumner: Honor, Idealism, and the Origins of the Civil War. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 62. ISBN   978-0-8018-9468-8 via Google Books.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  7. Walther, Eric H. (2004). The Shattering of the Union: America in the 1850s. Lanham, MD: SR Books. p. 97. ISBN   978-0-8420-2799-1 via Google Books.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  8. Daigh, Michael (2015). John Brown in Memory and Myth. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company. p. 113. ISBN   978-0-7864-9617-4 via Google Books.
  9. Walther (2004) , p. 98.
  10. Green, Michael S. (2010). Politics and America in Crisis: The Coming of the Civil War. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. p. 94. ISBN   978-0-313-08174-3 via Google Books.
  11. Thoreau, Henry David (2002). Hyde, Lewis (ed.). The Essays of Henry D. Thoreau: Selected and Edited by Lewis Hyde. New York: North Point Press. p. xliii. ISBN   978-0-86547-585-4 via Google Books.
  12. Puleo, Stephen (2013). The Caning: The Assault That Drove America to Civil War. Yardley, PA: Westholme Publishing. p. 112. ISBN   978-1-59416-187-2 via Google Books.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  13. Civil War Times Illustrated. vol 11. Harrisburg, PA: Historical Times Incorporated. 1972. p. 37 via Google Books.
  14. Walther (2004) , p. 99.
  15. Green, Michael S. (2010). Politics and America in Crisis: The Coming of the Civil War. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. p. 99. ISBN   978-0-275-99095-4 via Google Books.
  16. Kagan, Neil (2006). Eyewitness to the Civil War: The Complete History from Secession to Reconstruction. Washington, DC: National Geographic. p. 21. ISBN   978-0792262060 via Google Books.
  17. Shelden, Rachel A. (2013). Washington Brotherhood: Politics, Social Life, and the Coming of the Civil War. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. p. 122. ISBN   978-1-4696-1085-6 via Google Books.
  18. Scroggins, Mark (2011). Robert Toombs: The Civil Wars of a United States Senator and Confederate General. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company. p. 91. ISBN   978-0-7864-6363-3 via Google Books.
  19. Devens, R. M. (1882). "Assault on the Hon. Charles Sumner, by Hon. Preston S. Brooks". American Progress. Chicago, IL: Hugh Herron: 438 via Google Books.
  20. Campbell, L. D. (June 2, 1856). U.S. House of Representatives Report 182, 34th Congress, 1st Session: Select Committee Report, Alleged Assault upon Senator Sumner. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. pp. 64–65 via Google Books.
  21. Hoffer (2010) , p. 9.
  22. Langguth, A. J. (2014). After Lincoln: How the North Won the Civil War and Lost the Peace. New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 13. ISBN   978-1-4516-1732-0 via Google Books.
  23. Phelps, Charles A. (1872). Life and Public Services of Ulysses S. Grant. New York: Lee and Shepard. p.  362 via Internet Archive.
  24. Hoffer (2010) , pp. 8–11.
  25. Dickey, J.D. (2014). Empire of Mud: The Secret History of Washington, DC. Guilford, CT: Globe Pequot Press. p. 141. ISBN   978-0-7627-8701-2 via Google Books.
  26. Rives, John C. (June 2, 1856). The Congressional Globe. Washington, DC: John C. Rives. p. 1362 via Google Books.
  27. "#7 Raising Cane". Military History in 100 Objects: A Farewell to Arms (and Legs). MHN: Military History Now. May 5, 2015.
  28. Puleo (2013) , pp. 102, 114-115.
  29. McPherson, James M. (2003). Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. Oxford University Press. p. 150. ISBN   9780195168952 via Google Books.
  30. Gienapp, William E. (1988). The Origins of the Republican Party, 1852–1856. Oxford University Press. p. 359. ISBN   9780198021148 via Google Books.
  31. Puleo (2013) , pp. 36-7.
  32. Palmer, John J. (June 3, 1856). "The Caning Affair" . The Western Democrat. Charlotte, NC. p. 3.
  33. Hollister, Ovando James (1886). Life of Schuyler Colfax. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. p.  98 via Internet Archive.
  34. The National Cyclopaedia of American Biography. vol. IV. New York: James T. White & Company. 1895. p. 14 via Google Books.
  35. Boller, Paul F. (2004). Presidential Campaigns: From George Washington to George W. Bush. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 96. ISBN   978-0-19-516715-3 via Google Books.
  36. "Senator Wilson and Mr. Brooks" . Daily Courier. Louisville, KY. June 4, 1856. p. 3 via
  37. Merrill, Sally A. (October 27, 2017). "Cumberland and the Slavery Issue". Digital Cumberland, ME: Prince Memorial Library. p. 44.
  38. Gienapp, William E. (1979). "The Crime Against Sumner: The Caning of Charles Sumner and the Rise of the Republican Party". Civil War History. 25 (3): 218–45. doi:10.1353/cwh.1979.0005.
  39. Mitchell, Thomas G. (2007). Antislavery Politics in Antebellum and Civil War America. Westport, CT: Praeger. p. 95. ISBN   978-0-275-99168-5.
  40. Donald, David Herbert (2009). Charles Sumner and the Coming of the Civil War . Naprville, IL: Sourcebooks, Inc. p.  259.
  41. Charles Sumner and the Coming of the Civil War.
  42. Mitchell, Thomas G. (2007). Anti-Slavery Politics in Antebellum and Civil War America. p. 95.
  43. Brewster, Todd (2014). Lincoln's Gamble. New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 37–38. ISBN   978-1-4516-9386-7 via Google Books.
  44. Lossing, Benson J.; Wilson, Woodrow (1905). Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History from 458 A.D. to 1909. vol. 1. New York: Harper & Brothers. p. 409 via Google Books.
  45. "Outrage in the United States Senate: Senator Sumner, of Massachusetts, Knocked Down and Beaten till Insensible by Mr. Brooks, of South Carolina". The Baltimore Sun. May 23, 1856. p. 1 via ProQuest Archiver.
  46. Hoffer (2010) , p. 83.
  47. Wilson, James Grant; Fiske, John (1898). Appletons' Cyclopaedia of American Biography. vol. V, Pickering–Sumter. New York: D. Appleton and Company. p. 747 via Google Books.
  48. Amar, Akhil Reed (2006). America's Constitution: A Biography. New York: Random House. p. 372. ISBN   978-0-8129-7272-6 via Google Books.
  49. Tucker, Spencer C. (2015). American Civil War: A State-by-State Encyclopedia. vol. 1. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. p. 382. ISBN   978-1-59884-528-0 via Google Books.
  50. A Biographical Congressional Directory. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1913. p.  502 via Internet Archive.
  51. Ilisevich, Robert D. (1988). Galusha A. Grow: The People's Candidate . Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. p.  124. ISBN   978-0-8229-3606-0 via Internet Archive.
  52. Draper, Robert (2012). Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 155. ISBN   978-1-4516-4208-7 via Google Books.
  53. Transactions of the Kansas State Historical Society. vol. 7. Topeka, KS: W. Y. Morgan. 1902. p. 424 via Google Books.
  54. Sumner, Charles (1873). The Works of Charles Sumner. vol. IV. Boston: Lee & Shepard. p. 266 via Google Books.
  55. Donald, David Herbert (2009). Charles Sumner and the Coming of the Civil War . Naperville, IL: SourceBooks, Inc. p.  252.
  56. Charles Sumner and the Coming of the Civil War, p. 252.
  57. The Panic of 1857 and the Coming of the Civil War. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press. 1987. p. 258. ISBN   9780807124925.
  58. The Panic of 1857 and the Coming of the Civil War, p. 258.
  59. Puleo (2013) , p. 204.
  60. Mathis, Robert Neil (October 1978). "Preston Smith Brooks: The Man and His Image". South Carolina Historical Magazine. Vol. 79. Charleston, SC: South Carolina Historical Society. p. 308. In a deliberate, unemotional address he unexpectedly announced that he was prepared to vote for the admission of Kansas "even with a constitution rejecting slavery."