Codex Basiliensis A. N. IV. 1

Last updated

Minuscule 2
New Testament manuscript
Minuscule 2 (GA) Matt 1.jpg
NameCodex Basiliensis A. N. IV. 1
Text Gospels
Date11th/12th century
Script Greek
Now at University of Basel
Size19.5 cm by 15.2 cm
Type Byzantine text-type
Category V
NoteTextus Receptus

Codex Basiliensis A. N. IV. 1, known as Minuscule 2 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering of New Testament manuscripts), ε 1214 (in von Soden's numbering of New Testament manuscripts), [1] is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, written on parchment. Using the study of comparative writing styles (palaeography), it has been dated to the 11th or 12th century. [2] [3] The manuscript has complex contents. It is one of several Greek New Testament manuscripts housed at the Basel University Library, all of which take their name from the Latin adjective for Basel.

Contents

It was used by biblical scholar Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus in his edition of the Greek text of the New Testament, and became the basis for the Textus Receptus in the Gospels. Red chalk was used to mark on the manuscript as to how to produce the page format for Erasmus and his first published edition of the New Testament (by either Erasmus or someone else in the printing house), along with other marginal notes written in his hand.

Description

The manuscript is a codex (precursor to the modern book), containing the complete text of the four Gospels on 248 parchment leaves (size 19.5 cm by 15.2 cm) with the text covering only 13.6 cm by 9.9 cm of each page. [4] The text is written in 1 column, 20 lines per page, in minuscule letters written in light-brown ink, [3] [5] and contains ornaments in colour, with the initial letters in red ink. [4] The manuscript is replete with itacism errors (this being the confusion of like-sounding letters, specifically confusing ει and η), which Erasmus corrected so often that in certain places he incorrectly changed a correct spelling to a wrong one. [2] [5] Breathing marks (utilised to designate vowel emphasis) and accent marks (used to indicate voiced pitch changes) are also often incorrect. [2]

The text is divided according to the chapters (known as κεφαλαια / kephalaia), whose numbers are given in the margin (except in the Gospel of John), [6] and the titles of chapters (known as τιτλοι / titloi) at the top of the pages. There is also another division according to the smaller Ammonian Sections (an early division of the Gospels into sections). [6] Matthew has 359 divisions; Mark has 240; Luke has 342; and John has 231. [4] : 127  This is different to the standard divisions, of which there are commonly: 355, 235, 343, and 232 (Matt-Mark-Luke-John) respectively. There are no references to the Eusebian Canons (another early division of the Gospels into sections, and where parallel passages are found). [4] The tables of contents (also known as κεφαλαια) are placed before each Gospel, along with subscriptions at the end of each Gospel. Some leaves of the codex were lost, but the text of the Gospels has survived in a complete condition. [4]

Biblical scholar C. C. Tarelli describes the writing as "a very fair example of the standard minuscule book hand which prevailed from the tenth century to the twelfth [century]", stating that the date for the manuscript could "hardly be later than [the 12th century]", and "might even be earlier". [2] Erasmus wrote numerous corrections and alterations in the margins and between the already written lines of the manuscript, using a "pale-brown watery ink of thin line", [5] : 166  which according to scholar Kenneth W. Clark, his notes are "so inconspicuous that to pick them out requires the closest attention". [5] : 166 

Text

The Greek text of the codex is considered a representative of the majority Byzantine text-type. [2] [5] The text-types are groups of different New Testament manuscripts which share specific or generally related readings, which then differ from each other group, and thus the conflicting readings can separate out the groups. These are then used to determine the original text as published; there are three main groups with names: Alexandrian, Western, and Byzantine. [7] : 205–230  Based on shared readings with other manuscripts, Hermann von Soden classified it to his textual family Kx, a sub-group of Byzantine witnesses. [8] Biblical scholar Kurt Aland placed it in Category V of his New Testament manuscript text classification system. [9] : 138  Category V is for "Manuscripts with a purely or predominantly Byzantine text." [9] : 336  According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), it has a mixed Byzantine text in Luke 1. In Luke 10 and Luke 20 it represents Kx. [8]

Several of the singular readings of the manuscript are omissions, most of which are due to errors of sight such as homoeoteleuton (the omitting of words when one word is followed by another with the same letters at the end). [2] Additions are "rarer", and those which are included are possibly due to influence from liturgical readings. [2] : 157  The text of minuscule 2 is also nearly that of the text seen in Codex Basilensis (E), which is postulated by scholar C. C. Tarelli to "almost have been the exemplar from which [minuscule 2] was copied". [2] : 159  Biblical scholar Caspar René Gregory described the manuscript as "schlecht" (poor) and "wimmelt von Schreibfehlern" (teeming with scribal errors). [4] : 127 

In Matthew 16:2-3, [10] the manuscript doesn't have the entirety of the two verses, which are inserted in the margin at a later date in the 16th century. [2] : 159  In Mark 1:15, [11] it doesn't include ὅτι πεπλήρωται ὁ καιρὸς καὶ ἤγγικεν ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ (that the time is complete and the kingdom of God is near), an omission shared with minuscule 3 and 73, however which may have been made independently by the copyist of minuscule 2. [2] In Luke 6:28, [12] it lacks the phrase προσεύχεσθε ὑπὲρ τῶν ἐπηρεαζόντων ὑμᾶς (pray on behalf of those who mistreat you). It was added by a corrector in the lower margin. [7] : 144  In John 8:6, [13] it originally read μὴ προσποιούμενος (not paying any attention), which was subsequently erased by a corrector (believed to be Erasmus). [4] : 127  This variant is also seen in the manuscripts Codex Basilensis (F), Codex Seidelianus (G), Codex Cyprius (K), Codex Vaticanus 354 (S), Codex Petropolitanus (Π), Minuscule 579, and a large proportion of the Byzantine manuscripts. It is not included by the manuscripts Codex Campianus (Μ), Codex Nanianus (U), Codex Tischendorfianus IV (Γ), Codex Athous Dionysiou (Ω), Uncial 047, and Minuscule 7, 8, 9, 196, 461 c2, 1203, 1216, 1243, 1514, and lectionary ℓ663. [14] Erasmus did not use this phrase in his Novum Testamentum (an early critical edition of the Greek New Testament). [4]

History of the codex

Old University Basel Old University Basel.jpg
Old University Basel

The early story of the manuscript and its provenance is unknown. The codex was bought by monks at Basel for the price of two Rhenish florins (currency of the Rhineland in the 14–15th century), [6] [2] as per a 15th century note on the last page. [2] Since 1559 it has been held in the library of the University of Basel. [15]

When scholar Desiderius Erasmus moved to Basel in 1514, [16] : 38  he received this codex from the Dominican friars at Basel [16] and used it to underly the Gospels portion of the first edition of his Novum Testamentum , which was published in 1516. [16] : 45  Press corrections for the printing format are written on the pages, and according to biblical scholar Frederick H. A. Scrivener it was "barbarously scored with red chalk" to suit Erasmus' page format, [6] [17] of which these marks represent Erasmus' "alterations and emendations" based on other manuscripts. [2] Scholar Kenneth Clark instead attributes the red chalk/crayon markings to the printer, either the printing house owner Froben or another staff member. [5] : 166  However, subsequent scholars have not repeated this attribution and still state the markings were done by Erasmus himself. [18] [19] The original Greek page marks are usually written over with Western used numerals. [17] 130 marginal corrections are from Erasmus, with 55 of these appearing in the Gospel of Matthew. [17] Another hand added chapter numbers. [17] Several smudges or probably ink stains appear on the manuscript, which may indicate that the manuscript was used in the book publisher's printing room. [17] For subsequent editions of his Novum Testamentum, Erasmus introduced readings from other manuscripts. [16] : 48 

Biblical scholar Robert Estienne did not directly consult this manuscript to use in his Editio Regia (another critical edition of the Greek New Testament first published in 1546), [16] : 52  but since his edition was based on the Erasmian text, several of minuscule 2's readings are found in the Textus Receptus (the name eventually given to Estienne's editions of the Greek New Testament). Though many have stated minuscule 2 was the "basis" for the Textus Receptus, Erasmus himself corrected many of its omissions, introduced emendations, and according to Tarelli "departed so frequently from 2 that he can hardly be said to have derived his text 'mainly' from this manuscript." [2] : 157  Many of Erasmus' readings appear to have come from Minuscule 1, another of the Basel manuscripts, and can be said to be "too numerous to be accidental." [2] : 157  Several variant readings that depart from the text in minuscule 2 appear to have correlations with the Latin Vulgate. [2] : 158 

German classicist and historian Martin Crusius used this manuscript in 1577 and noted variant readings. [4] : 127  The manuscript was examined by biblical scholar Johann Albrecht Bengel (who labelled it as codex β and noted variant readings), [6] [4] : 127  biblical scholars Johann Jakob Wettstein (also noting variant readings), [6] [4] : 127  Dean Burgon, Herman C. Hoskier, and Gregory. [6] [4] : 127  According to biblical scholars Bruce M. Metzger and Scrivener, it is one of the "inferior manuscripts" used by Erasmus. [6] [7] : 143-4  Wettstein gave it number 2 on his list, and this siglum has remained since being incorporated into the Gregory-Aland numbered list of New Testament manuscripts. [1] [20] The codex is currently located at the Basel University Library (shelf number A.N. IV. 1) at Basel, Switzerland. [3] [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Byzantine text-type</span> New Testament text type

In the textual criticism of the New Testament, the Byzantine text-type is one of the main text types. It is the form found in the largest number of surviving manuscripts of the Greek New Testament. The New Testament text of the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Patriarchal Text, as well as those utilized in the lectionaries, are based on this text-type. Similarly, the Aramaic Peshitta which often conforms to the Byzantine text is used as the standard version in the Syriac tradition, including the Syriac Orthodox Church and the Chaldean church. Whilst varying in around 1,800 places from printed editions, the Byzantine text-type also underlies the Textus Receptus Greek text used for most Reformation-era (Protestant) translations of the New Testament into vernacular languages. Modern translations mainly use eclectic editions that conform more often to the Alexandrian text-type, which is viewed as the most accurate text-type by most scholars, although some modern translations that use the Byzantine text-type have been created.

<i>Textus Receptus</i> Greek critical text of the New Testament

Textus Receptus refers to the succession of printed Greek New Testament texts starting with Erasmus' Novum Instrumentum omne (1516) and including the editions of Stephanus, Beza, Elzevir, Colinaeus and Scrivener. Additionally, although not being derived from the work of Erasmus, some such as the Trinitarian Bible Society also associate the Complutensian Polyglot with the Textus Receptus tradition.

<i>Novum Testamentum Graece</i> Critical edition of the Greek New Testament

Novum Testamentum Graece is a critical edition of the New Testament in its original Koine Greek, forming the basis of most modern Bible translations and biblical criticism. It is also known as the Nestle–Aland edition after its most influential editors, Eberhard Nestle and Kurt Aland. The text, edited by the Institute for New Testament Textual Research, is currently in its 28th edition, abbreviated NA28.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family 1</span> Collection of related medieval Biblical Manuscripts regarded as a Family

Family 1 is the name given to a group of Greek New Testament minuscule manuscripts of the Gospels, identified by biblical scholar Kirsopp Lake. These manuscripts vary in date from the 12th to the 15th century. The group takes its name from minuscule codex 1, now in the Basel University Library, Switzerland. "Family 1" is also symbolized as ƒ1 in critical editions of the Greek New Testament. Textual-critic Hermann von Soden refers to the group as Iη. Initially named after minuscule 1, later studies have demonstrated that another minuscule, minuscule 1582, is likely a better candidate as a representation of the archetype from which the Family 1 manuscripts are descended.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Tischendorfianus III</span> New Testament manuscript

Codex Tischendorfianus III – designated by siglum Λ or 039, ε 77 – is a Greek uncial manuscript of the Gospels on parchment. Palaeographically it has been assigned to the 9th or 10th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 2</span> Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament

Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 2, known as Minuscule 1, δ 254, and formerly designated by 1eap to distinguish it from minuscule 1rK is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the entire New Testament, apart from the Book of Revelation. Using the study of comparative writings styles (palaeography), it is usually dated to the 12th century CE.

Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 4, known as Minuscule 2815, α 253 (Soden), formerly labelled as 2ap in all catalogues, but subsequently renumbered by Aland, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, dated paleographically to the 12th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minuscule 2814</span> New Testament manuscript

Minuscule 2814, Aν20, formerly labelled as 1rK in all catalogues, but subsequently renumbered as a 2814 by Aland, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, dated palaeographically to the 12th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minuscule 3</span> Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament

Vindobonensis Suppl. Gr. 52, also known as Minuscule 3, or δ 253, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, written on vellum. Using the study of comparative writing styles (palaeography), it has been dated to the 12th century. It was one of the manuscripts used by biblical scholar Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus in his edition of the Greek text of the New Testament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minuscule 4</span> Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament

Minuscule 4, ε 371, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, written on vellum. Using the study of comparative writing styles (palaeography), it has been dated to the 13th century. It was formerly named Codex Regius 84. It has a full collection of marginal marks. It was adapted for liturgical use.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minuscule 5</span> Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament

Minuscule 5, δ 453, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, on 342 parchment leaves. Using the study of comparative writing styles (palaeography), it has been dated to the 13th century.

Codex Basiliensis A. N. III. 11, known as Minuscule 2817, α 287. Formerly it was labeled as 7pK in all catalogs, but it was renumbered by Gregory, because two manuscripts had number 7. It is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, dated palaeographically to the 12th century. Scrivener and the INTF date it to the 11th century.

Minuscule 7, ε 287, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, written on parchment. Using the study of comparative writings styles (palaeography), it has been assigned to the 12th century.

<i>Novum Instrumentum omne</i> First published New Testament in Greek

Novum Instrumentum Omne, later titled Novum Testamentum Omne, was a series of bilingual Latin-Greek New Testaments with substantial scholarly annotations, and the first printed New Testament of the Greek to be published. They were prepared by Desiderius Erasmus (1466–1536) in consultation with leading scholars, and printed by Johann Froben (1460–1527) of Basel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Montfortianus</span> New Testament manuscript

Codex Montfortianus designated by 61, δ 603, and known as Minuscule 61 is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament on paper. Erasmus named it Codex Britannicus. Its completion is dated on the basis of its textual affinities to no earlier than the second decade of the 16th century, though a 15th-century date is possible on palaeographic grounds. The manuscript is famous for including a unique version of the Comma Johanneum. It has marginalia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minuscule 2816</span> New Testament manuscript

Codex Basilensis A.N.IV.5, known as Minuscule 2816, α597, formerly labelled as 4ap in all catalogs, but subsequently renumbered by Aland, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, paleographically had been assigned to the 15th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minuscule 113</span> New Testament manuscript

Minuscule 113, ε 134 (Soden), is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, on parchment leaves. Paleographically it has been assigned to the 11th-century.

Minuscule 225, ε 1210, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, written on parchment. A colophon dates it to the year 1192. It was adapted for liturgical use.

Codex Basiliensis A. N. III, 15, also known as Minuscule 817, Θε52, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament written on paper, with a commentary. It was used by Erasmus. Palaeographically it has been assigned to the 15th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Textual criticism of the New Testament</span> Analysis of the manuscripts of the New Testament

Textual criticism of the New Testament is the identification of textual variants, or different versions of the New Testament, whose goals include identification of transcription errors, analysis of versions, and attempts to reconstruct the original text. Its main focus is studying the textual variants in the New Testament.

References

  1. 1 2 Gregory, Caspar René (1908). Die griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testament. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs'sche Buchhandlung. p. 48.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Tarelli, C. C. (1943). "Erasmus's Manuscripts of the Gospels". Journal of Theological Studies. 44 (175/176): 156. JSTOR   23957132.
  3. 1 2 3 Aland, Kurt; M. Welte; B. Köster; K. Junack (1994). Kurzgefasste Liste der griechischen Handschriften des Neues Testaments (2 ed.). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. p. 47. ISBN   3-11-011986-2.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Gregory, Caspar René (1900). Textkritik des Neuen Testaments. Vol. 1. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung. pp. 127–128.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Clark, Kenneth Willis (1980). "Observations on the Erasmian Notes in Codex 2". The Gentile Bias and Other Essays. Leiden: Brill. p. 165. ISBN   90-04-06127-4.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose; Edward Miller (1894). A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament . Vol. 1 (4th ed.). London: George Bell & Sons. p. 191.
  7. 1 2 3 Metzger, Bruce Manning; Ehrman, Bart Denton (2005). The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration (4 ed.). New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-516122-9.
  8. 1 2 Wisse, Frederik (1982). The Profile Method for the Classification and Evaluation of Manuscript Evidence, as Applied to the Continuous Greek Text of the Gospel of Luke . Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 53. ISBN   0-8028-1918-4.
  9. 1 2 Aland, Kurt; Aland, Barbara (1995). The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism . Erroll F. Rhodes (trans.). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. ISBN   978-0-8028-4098-1.
  10. ↑ Matthew 16:2–3
  11. ↑ Mark 1:15
  12. ↑ Luke 6:28
  13. ↑ John 8:6
  14. ↑ The Gospel According to John in the Byzantine Tradition. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft. 2007. p. 100.
  15. ↑ Wallraff, Martin; Stöcklin-Kaldewey, Sara (2010). Schatzkammern der Universität (in German). Basil: Schwabe Verlag. p. 16. ISBN   978-3-7965-2674-9.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 Combs, W. W. (1996). "Erasmus and the textus receptus". Detroit Baptist Seminary Journal. 1: 45.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 Andrist, Patrick (2018). Érasme 1514-1516 et les étapes de la préparation du texte biblique et des prologues grecs du Novum Instrumentum : le témoignage des manuscrits (in French). Belgium: Brepolis. p. 144-5. ISBN   978-2-503-57998-6.
  18. ↑ Andrist, Patrick (2016). "Structure and History of the Biblical Manuscripts Used by Erasmus for His 1516 Edition". In Wallraff, Martin; Menchi, Silvana Seidel; von Greyerz, Kaspar (eds.). Basil 1516: Erasmus' Edition of the New Testament. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck. p. 97. ISBN   978-3-16-155274-8.
  19. ↑ Brown, Andrew J. (2016). "The Manuscript Sources and Textual Character of Erasmus' 1516 Greek New Testament". In Wallraff, Martin; Menchi, Silvana Seidel; von Greyerz, Kaspar (eds.). Basil 1516: Erasmus' Edition of the New Testament. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck. p. 127. ISBN   978-3-16-155274-8.
  20. 1 2 "Liste Handschriften". Münster: Institute for New Testament Textual Research. Retrieved 2013-05-01.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.