Colorado Party (Uruguay)

Last updated

Colorado Party
Partido Colorado
AbbreviationPC
General Secretary Andrés Ojeda
Founder Fructuoso Rivera
Founded17 September 1836;189 years ago (1836-09-17)
HeadquartersMartínez Trueba 1271, Montevideo
Ideology
Political position
National affiliation Republican Coalition
Regional affiliation COPPPAL [7]
Colors   Red, yellow
Chamber of Deputies
17 / 99
Senate
5 / 30
Intendencias
1 / 19
Mayors
3 / 125
Party flag
Flag of Colorado Party (Uruguay).svg
Website
www.partidocolorado.com.uy

The Colorado Party (Spanish : Partido Colorado, lit.'Red Party', PC) is a major political party in Uruguay. Founded in 1836 by General Fructuoso Rivera, the first president of Uruguay, it is one of the country's oldest active political parties along with the National Party, their origin dates back to the establishment of Uruguay as an independent state.

Contents

Traditionally an ideologically diverse party it nowadays sits in the centre-right side of the political spectrum. Their current position in the Uruguayan political landscape is conditioned by the coalition they have formed with their historic adversary, the National Party, in opposition to the Broad Front (Frente Amplio), the latter being a leftist coalition formed in the early 1970s that has become, since the 1999 election, the most-voted electoral force in the country, reshaping Uruguayan electoral politics and displacing the Colorado Party from its traditional position of dominance to becoming the third party in the country, behind the National Party.

Ideology

The party seeks to unite moderate and liberal groups, although its members have had a diverse set of ideologies since its foundation, including Krausism and liberal conservatism, as well as general pragmatism. It was the dominant party of government almost without exception during the stabilization of the Uruguayan republic.

The Colorado Party has traditionally been an ideologically diverse party, with one study from the 1950s noting that "the liberal ideological position assumed by the Colorado. a half-century ago under the drive of Batlle has forced the Blancos or Nationalists to become more relatively conservative in position. On the part of both major parties, however, many inconsistencies and many ideological subdivisions, temporary or permanent, occur. Each of the large parties has its conservatives and its liberals, and party lines are often difficult to hold in congressional debate.” [8]

History

Its existence can be traced back to the origins of the Uruguayan republic, in the 1830s, and since then until the late 1990s it remained the most dominant political party in the country, holding power almost uninterruptedly (alternating with the National Party, its greatest rival) until its electoral collapse in the 2004 elections, when the Party obtained only 10% of the vote. [9]

During the first third of the 20th century, and under the stewardship and legacy of José Batlle y Ordóñez (1856-1929), the largest sectors of the Colorado Party stood for a radical agenda of social reform, including the promotion of workers’ rights, women’s rights, statism and the ample provision of public services, democratic political reform and regular use of direct democracy mechanisms, secularization, and the establishment of a generous welfare state. [10] During the 1940s and 1950s, led by Luis Batlle Berres (nephew of José Batlle) this Batllista wing of the Colorado Party stood also for state-led industrialization efforts and an economic dirigiste regime. In the late 1960s, though, the Party began to abandon the most radical part of that social agenda (as well as the dirigiste approach to economic matters) and now stands in the center, center-right of the Uruguayan political spectrum.

At the 2004 national elections, the Colorado Party won 10 seats out of 99 in the Chamber of Representatives and 3 seats out of 31 in the Senate. Its presidential candidate, Guillermo Stirling, won 10.4% of the popular vote and placed third, ending the 10-year rule of the Colorado Party and the two-party system. [11]

Since then, the Colorados have been able to recuperate some of their lost support, but as of 2024 they haven’t reached the 20% threshold in any of the elections celebrated in that period (2009, 2014, 2019, 2024).

Current high-profile personalities from the Party include Andrés Ojeda and Pedro Bordaberry. [12]

Earlier history

The Colorado Party was founded in Montevideo, Uruguay, on 17 September 1836.

Some of its significant historical leaders were Fructuoso Rivera, Venancio Flores, José Batlle y Ordóñez, Luis Batlle Berres, Jorge Pacheco Areco, Juan María Bordaberry, Julio María Sanguinetti, Luis Bernardo Pozzolo, and Jorge Batlle.

The party has historically been the most elected party in Uruguayan history with almost uninterrupted dominance during the 20th century. The Colorados were in office from 1865 to 1959, when they were defeated by the Partido Nacional in the 1958 elections. They returned to office after the 1966 elections. They won the first elections at the end of the military dictatorship, in 1984. They went on to win the 1994 and 1999 elections.

Traditional rivals

From its birth until the last decades of the 20th century its traditional rival was the conservative Partido Nacional (also called Partido Blanco).

Post-2004: defeat at polls and rise of Pedro Bordaberry

Pro-Colorado graffito in Montevideo. Accion Colorada 011.jpg
Pro-Colorado graffito in Montevideo.

The Colorado Party suffered its worst defeat ever in the 2004 national elections, with little over 10 per cent of the popular vote for its presidential candidate Guillermo Stirling, and having only three out of thirty national Senators. There were many reasons for the party's failure, including the economic crisis and old party leaders. Subsequently to his defeat in 2004, Guillermo Stirling endorsed Pedro Bordaberry's Vamos Uruguay movement. Bordaberry Herrán became the presidential candidate for the 2009 presidential election, and placed third, with 17 percent of the vote, behind José Mujica and Luis Alberto Lacalle. Bordaberry Herrán placed third again in the 2014 presidential election, with 13% of the vote.

Electoral history

Presidential elections

ElectionParty candidateRunning mateVotes%Votes%Result
First RoundSecond Round
Elections under the Ley de Lemas system
1938 Alfredo Baldomir César Charlone 121,25933.9%ElectedGreen check.svg
Eduardo Blanco Acevedo Eugenio Martínez Thedy 97,99827.4%LostRed x.svg
Lema540.0%
Total votes219,31161.4%
1942 Juan José de Amézaga Alberto Guani 234,12740.7%ElectedGreen check.svg
Eduardo Blanco Acevedo Carlos Vilaró Rubio74,76713.0%LostRed x.svg
WillimanMermot6700.1%
Lema660.0%
Total votes309,63057.2%
1946 Tomás Berreta Luis Batlle Berres 185,71528.6%ElectedGreen check.svg
Rafael SchiaffinoDaniel Castellanos83,53412.9%LostRed x.svg
Alfredo Baldomir Juan Carlos Mussio Fournier40,8756.3%
Lema3720.0%
Total votes310,49647.8%
1950 Andrés Martínez Trueba Alfeo Brum 161,26219.6%ElectedGreen check.svg
César Mayo Gutiérrez Lorenzo Batlle Pacheco 150,93018.3%LostRed x.svg
Eduardo Blanco Acevedo Cyro Giambruno120,94914.7%
Lema3130.0%
Total votes433,45452.6%
1966 Óscar Diego Gestido Jorge Pacheco Areco 262,04021.3%ElectedGreen check.svg
Jorge Batlle Julio Lacarte Muró 215,64217.5%LostRed x.svg
Amílcar Vasconcellos Renán Rodríguez 77,4766.3%
Zelmar Michelini Aquiles Lanza48,9924.0%
Justino Jiménez de AréchagaNilo Berchesi4,0640.0%
Lema3890.0%
Total votes607,63349.3%
1971 Juan María Bordaberry Jorge Sapelli 379,51522.8%ElectedGreen check.svg
Jorge Batlle Renán Rodríguez 242,80414.6%LostRed x.svg
Amílcar Vasconcellos Manuel Flores Mora 48,8442.9%
Juan Luis PintosTorialli5,4020.3%
Juan Pedro RibasGorlero4,0250.2%
Lema6040.0%
Total votes681,62441.0%
1984 Julio María Sanguinetti Enrique Tarigo 588,14331.2%ElectedGreen check.svg
Jorge Pacheco Areco Carlos Pirán183,5889.7%LostRed x.svg
Lema5,9700.3%
Total votes777,70141.2%
1989 Jorge Batlle Jorge Sanguinetti 291,94414.20%LostRed x.svg
Jorge Pacheco Areco Pablo Millor289,22214.06%
Hugo Fernández Faingold Enrique Vispo14,4820.70%
Lema1,3160.06%
Total votes596,96429.03%
1994 Julio María Sanguinetti Hugo Batalla 500,76024.7%ElectedGreen check.svg
Jorge Batlle Federico Bouza102,5515.1%LostRed x.svg
Jorge Pacheco Areco Eduardo Ache51,9352.6%
Total votes656,42632.3%
Elections under single presidential candidate per party
1999 Jorge Batlle Luis Antonio Hierro López 703,91532.8%1,158,70854.1%ElectedGreen check.svg
2004 Guillermo Stirling Tabaré Viera 231,03610.36%LostRed x.svg
2009 Pedro Bordaberry Hugo de León 392,30717.02%LostRed x.svg
2014 Pedro Bordaberry Germán Coutinho305,69912.89%LostRed x.svg
2019 Ernesto Talvi Robert Silva 300,17712.80%LostRed x.svg
2024 Andres Ojeda Robert Silva 392,59216.89%LostRed x.svg

Note

Under the electoral system in place at the time called Ley de Lemas system, each political party could have as many as three presidential candidates. The combined result of the votes for a party's candidates determined which party would control the executive branch, and whichever of the winning party's candidates finished in first place would be declared President this system was used form the 1942 election until the 1994 election until in 1996, a referendum amended the constitution to restrict each party to a single presidential candidate, effective from the 1999 elections.

Chamber of Deputies and Senate elections

ElectionVotes%Chamber seats+/–Senate seats+/-PositionSize
1916 60,42041.2%
87 / 218
Increase2.svg 87Increase2.svg 2nd
1917 63,61749.4%UnknownIncrease2.svg 1st
1919 Ran as various factions, see 1919 Uruguayan parliamentary election
1922 Ran as various factions, see 1922 Uruguayan parliamentary election
1925 Ran as various factions, see 1925 Uruguayan parliamentary election
1928 Ran as various factions, see 1928 Uruguayan general election
1931 Ran as various factions, see 1931 Uruguayan parliamentary election
1933 Ran as various factions, see 1933 Uruguayan Constitutional Assembly election
1934 139,83256.1%
55 / 99
Decrease2.svg 5
15 / 30
Increase2.svg 15Steady2.svg 1st
Senate125,98157.0%
1938 219,36258.4%
64 / 99
Increase2.svg 9
15 / 30
Steady2.svg 0Steady2.svg 1st
Senate219,37560.6%
1942 328,59657.1%
58 / 99
Decrease2.svg 6
19 / 30
Increase2.svg 4Steady2.svg 1st
Senate328,59957.2%
1946 310,55646.3%
47 / 99
Decrease2.svg 11
15 / 30
Decrease2.svg 4Steady2.svg 1st
Senate310,39046.3%
1950 433,62852.3%
53 / 99
Increase2.svg 6
17 / 30
Increase2.svg 2Steady2.svg 1st
Senate433,44052.9%
1954 444,42950.6%
51 / 99
Decrease2.svg 2
17 / 31
Steady2.svg 0Steady2.svg 1st
1958 379,06237.7%
38 / 99
Decrease2.svg 13
12 / 31
Decrease2.svg 5Decrease2.svg 2nd
1962 521,23144.5%
44 / 99
Increase2.svg 6
14 / 31
Increase2.svg 2Steady2.svg 2nd
1966 607,63349.3%
50 / 99
Increase2.svg 6
16 / 30
Increase2.svg 2Steady2.svg 2nd
1971 681,62441.0%
41 / 99
Decrease2.svg 9
13 / 30
Decrease2.svg 3Increase2.svg 1st
1984 777,70141.2%
41 / 99
Steady2.svg 0
13 / 30
Steady2.svg 0Steady2.svg 1st
1989 596,96429.03%
30 / 99
Decrease2.svg 11
9 / 30
Decrease2.svg 4Decrease2.svg 2nd
1994 656,42632.3%
32 / 99
Increase2.svg 2
11 / 31
Increase2.svg 2Increase2.svg 1st
1999 703,91532.8%
33 / 99
Increase2.svg 1
10 / 30
Decrease2.svg 1Coalition (PC–PN)Decrease2.svg 2nd
2004 231,03610.36%
10 / 99
Decrease2.svg 23
3 / 30
Decrease2.svg 7OppositionDecrease2.svg 3rd
2009 392,30717.02%
17 / 99
Increase2.svg 7
5 / 30
Increase2.svg 2OppositionSteady2.svg 3rd
2014 305,69912.89%
13 / 99
Decrease2.svg 4
4 / 30
Decrease2.svg 2OppositionSteady2.svg 3rd
2019 300,17712.80%
13 / 99
Steady2.svg 0
4 / 30
Steady2.svg 0Coalition (PN–PC–CAPGPI)Steady2.svg 3rd
2024 392,59216.89%
17 / 99
Increase2.svg 4
5 / 30
Increase2.svg 1OppositionSteady2.svg 3rd

National Council of Administration and National Council of Government elections

ElectionVotes%Council seats+/-Position
1925 Ran as various factions, see 1925 Uruguayan parliamentary election
1926 Ran as various factions, see 1926 Uruguayan general election
1928 Ran as various factions, see 1928 Uruguayan general election
1930 165,06952.1%Unknown1st
1932 107,66467.0%UnknownSteady2.svg 1st
Abolished in 1933, reestablished as National Council of Government
1954 444,42950.6%
6 / 9
Increase2.svg 61st
1958 379,06237.7%
3 / 9
Decrease2.svg 3Decrease2.svg 2nd
1962 545,029521,231
3 / 9
Steady2.svgSteady2.svg 2nd
National Council abolished in 1966, presidential system reestablished

See also

References

  1. Claps, Manuel Arturo; Lamas, Mario Daniel (1999). El batllismo como ideología. Cal y Canto.
  2. Caetano, Gerardo (2021). "El "Impulso republicano" del Uruguay del 900: La reforma política del "primer batllismo" (1890-1930)". Varia Historia. 37 (73): 217–250. doi: 10.1590/0104-87752021000100008 . S2CID   233523381.
  3. Nahum, Benjamín; Barrán, José Pedro (1982). El nacimiento del batllismo. Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.
  4. Di Tella, Torcuato (2006). Diccionario de Ciencias Sociales y Políticas (2nd ed.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ariel. p. 46. ISBN   978-950-9122-86-4.
  5. "Países y Partidos Miembros de la COPPPAL – Copppal". Archived from the original on 21 August 2020. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  6. Uruguay: Portrait of a Democracy By Russell Humke Fitzgibbon, 1956 P.148-149
  7. "elmundo.es - Uruguay elige por primera vez a un presidente de izquierdas". www.elmundo.es. Retrieved 24 February 2025.
  8. Di Tella, Torcuato (2006). Diccionario de Ciencias Sociales y Políticas (2nd ed.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ariel. p. 46. ISBN   978-950-9122-86-4.
  9. X (1 November 2004). "Uruguayans Give Resounding Win to First Leftist President". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 24 February 2025.
  10. "Lista de Bordaberry ganó la interna partidaria, pero no tendrá más peso en Senado colorado". Montevideo Portal (in Spanish). Retrieved 24 February 2025.