Cornelius Johnson or Cornelis Janssens van Ceulen (Dutch:[kɔrˈneːlɪˈʃɑnsəns fɑŋ ˈkøːlə(n)];[1] also Cornelius Jonson van Ceulen, Cornelis Jansz. van Ceulen and many other variants)[2] (bapt. 14 October 1593 – bur. 5 August 1661) was an English painter of portraits of Dutch or Flemish parentage. He was active in England, from at least 1618 to 1643, when he moved to Middelburg in the Netherlands to escape the English Civil War. Between 1646 and 1652 he lived in Amsterdam, before settling in Utrecht, where he died.
Johnson painted many portraits of emerging new English gentry. His early portraits were panel paintings with "fictive" oval frames. His works can be found in major collections in the UK and overseas as well as in private collections in stately homes in Britain.
He was an accomplished portrait painter, but lacked the flair of a master such as Van Dyck. His style varied considerably over his career, and he was able to assimilate new influences into his own style without any discordant effect. He was particularly accurate and detailed in his depiction of clothing. He was one of the few artists in England at this time who consistently signed and dated their work.
Family life
Portrait of Susanna Temple, later Lady Lister (1620) – Google Art Project. This is one of a number of portraits of the Temple family painted by Johnson
Johnson was born to Dutch or Flemish parents in London – his father had been a religious refugee from Antwerp,[3] and his paternal grandfather had come from Cologne.[4][5] He was baptised at the Dutch Church at Austin Friars much used by the Netherlandish community in London.[6] He was the son of Johanna le Grand and Cornelius Johnson. He may have been trained in the Netherlands, possibly under Michiel Jansz. van Mierevelt.[7] He was certainly influenced by other artists from the Netherlands,[8] and his early works follow the design and mood of Dutch painters.[9]
He had returned to England by 1619 when he was a witness at the baptism of his nephew, Theodore Russell – Johnson' sister was married to Nicholas Russell of Bruges.[10] He was active in England, from then until 1643. In the 1620s, he lived and had his studio in Blackfriars, London, as did Anthony van Dyck and Peter Oliver;[11] it was within the boundaries of the City of London, but was a liberty and so avoided the monopoly in the City of members of the London painters' Guild.[12] He married Elizabeth Beke of Colchester on 16 July 1622 at the Dutch church in London.[13] Their son James (who presumably died young) was baptised on 30 September 1623 at St Anne's Church.[13] Another son Cornelius Johnson, junior who also became a painter, was baptised on 15 August 1634.[14]
Johnson wished to be regarded as an English gentleman, registering his pedigree with the College of Arms.[15] His arms were three gold parrots on a gold background, and had a crest of a silver Catherine wheel with two parrot wings behind it. Apparently winged crests are common in German heraldry which may show the arms previously used by the family.[16]
Johnson moved to Canterbury in the mid-1630s, living with Sir Arnold Braems, a Flemish merchant, and continued to live in England until after the outbreak of the English Civil War, but in October 1643, apparently at the insistence of his wife, he moved to Middelburg, joining the Guild of St. Luke there.[17] He was given parliamentary permission to travel " ... and to cary with him such pictures and colours, bedding, household stuff, pewter, and brass as belongs to himself".[18] Between 1646 and 1652 he lived in Amsterdam, before settling in Utrecht, where he was buried.[19]
Portraiture
Johnson' first dated work is 1617, and may be of a Dutch subject; 1619 marks the beginning of his English portraits, which were initially heads only, although he later painted full-length and group portraits.[20]
For painting a portrait, Johnson liked to charge £5[21] compared with a more typical figure of 10s – 20s.[22] However, this was not as expensive as better known artists such as Van Dyck or Peter Lely.[23][24] Karen Hearn's ODNB entry for Johnson notes that "in 1638 Sir Thomas Pelham of Halland House, Sussex, paid £4 for his portrait by Johnson" (referencing an account book among the Pelham family papers, BL, Add. MS 33145, fol. 107).
Elizabeth Campion (1614-1673), 1631.Baron Capel and his Family, 1641. Capel was a leading Royalist, executed in 1649.
There are hundreds of portraits of the emerging new gentry by Johnson,[25] including Lady Rose MacDonnell of Antrim. "Johnson's art was best suited to the relative intimacy of the bust length portrait in which, with a certain detachment, he captured the reticence of the English landed gentry and minor aristocracy".[26] One of his earliest surviving portraits is of Susanna Temple, grandmother of Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough (Tate). This portrait was subsequently engraved by Robert White towards the end of the seventeenth century. A copy of the engraving was among the prints owned by Samuel Pepys which subsequently passed to Magdalene College, Cambridge.[27]
After his move to the Netherlands, he continued to produce portraits of English clients – both exiled Royalists, and clients still living in England.[29]
Studio
Johnson's studio in the 1620s was in St Anne's, Blackfriars, London.[30] The size of Johnson’s studio is not known, but surviving portraits such as the portrait erroneously inscribed Countess of Arundel and that of Sir Alexander Temple (both below) help reconstruct the painting process. It is likely that Johnson did not paint the complete portraits himself. The wet-over-dry paint layering of the costumes (see 'Technique' below) and the fictive ovals allowed contributions from others in the studio, as did the demand for additional versions.[31]
Patronage
His patrons came from the gentry, but were not from the highest levels in society.[3] His sitters were Dutch immigrants, gentlemen and courtiers.[32] During the first few years of his career, a network of patronage by five families enabled Johnson to establish his reputation as a painter on the national stage. These families were the Boothby family of London and Chingford, the Corbett family of Shropshire, the Leveson family of Shropshire and Staffordshire, the Temple family of Burton Dassett and Stowe, and the Lenthall family of Burford and Besselsleigh. These families were connected to each other by marriage.[33]
The identity of many of his sitters has been lost.[15] Despite having only received a few commissions from the crown, in 1632, Johnson was appointed as "his Majesty's servant in the quality of Picture drawer" by Charles I. This appointment was perhaps in connection with the arrival of Van Dyck and the departure from England of Daniel Mytens – Johnson may have been found a role as a back-up for van Dyck.[20]
Style
He has been described as "one of the most gifted and prolific portrait painters practising in England during the 1620s and 1630s".[34] Lionel Cust describes him as being "more accomplished" than Gheeraerts.[35] However, he has also been described as "a good painter, but unable to compete with the flair and superlative skills of van Dyck".[12] Compared with van Dyck, Johnson's portraits were "lower key but exquisite".[32]
He was one of the few artists in England at this time who consistently signed and dated their work, except for his later full-lengths, which his clients may have hoped would be mistaken for more expensive Van Dycks. He may have been successful in this, as some full-length portraits attributed to van Dyck's workshop may well be by him.[20] In the early years, his standard way of signing portraits was the phrase "fecit C J", although the 1619 portrait entitled the Countess of Arundel (below) is signed Cornelius Johnson fecit and many later works also have a full signature.[36]
Johnson's early portraits were panel paintings with "fictive" oval frames – they appear to have a wooden or marble oval surround, but this is actually painted on to the panel. This trompe-l'œil effect was one of Johnson' favourite devices in the early part of his career. "His figures are usually placed in front of dark, undefined backgrounds with focus on their faces and elaborate costumes that denote their social standing."[37] He also painted some portrait miniatures on copper.
His early works (for example the 1620 portrait of Sir Alexander Temple) were described by C. H. Collins Baker as "flat wooden and inanimate".[38] Within a year, he has made "an astonishing advance" and his modelling becomes full and "his temper established". His earliest three-quarter length work is a pair of portraits of Thomas Boothby and his wife painted in 1619 and sold by the Weiss Gallery in 1988.[39] Another three-quarter length portrait (of Lord Keeper Coventry) is dated 1623, and shows a certain lack of skill in dealing with the body, which is overcome in later works.[40]
In his portraits, the sitters head is often unexpectedly low. The eyes have enlarged, rounded irises and deep curved upper lids.[41]
The London Painters and Stainers company has a 1623/4 portrait of Clement Pargeter, William Peacock and Thomas Babb that may be by Johnson. If so, it is the earliest group portrait by him.[42]
His style was conservative[3] although it varied considerably over his career, and he was able to assimilate new influences into his own style without any discordant effect. He took from, in turn, Mytens, van Dyck, and William Dobson. His last Dutch portraits show a different style reflecting contemporary portraiture there.[19] However he also influenced other artists – both lesser lights as well as more accomplished artists such as van Dyck.[43] Following the Netherlandish tradition, he was particularly accurate and detailed in depiction of clothing.[3] As a result, his portraits are especially useful to costume historians.[44]
Technique
Johnson uses a number of techniques that taken together uniquely identify his studio during his early career.[45] These include the presence of both wet-in-wet and discreet layering; calculated variations in brushwork and the use of high quality (and expensive) pigments that survived aging well.
He "was masterful in bringing the unique characteristics of his pigments to the most dazzling effect. Johnson’s use of azurite blue is a primary example of how he utilized the character of each pigment to yield distinctive textures and eye-catching details."[46]
Johnson was consulted by Théodore de Mayerne on handling orpiment (a poisonous yellow pigment) and painted his portrait.[47][48] In addition to describing his usage of orpiment to de Mayerne, Johnson also told Daniel King his technique for draperies. For linen draperies he used "white and oker broken with bone black". For blue draperies, he first laid in "all the background folds and shadows ... neatly and perfectly finished" with "indico ground in drying oiland mixt w[i]th smalt and white". When this had dried, he painted over it a glaze of ultramarine and "fair white".[49]
Exhibitions, sales and ownership of his work in important collections
From the second half of the seventeenth century onwards, there were frequent art auctions in London and later in provincial cities. Johnson's work was regularly sold at these auctions – for example lot 150 at a sale of paintings at Exeter Exchange in the Strand, 3 April 1690.[50]
Karen Hearn, Honorary Professor at UCL, curated a display of Johnson's work which was held at the National Portrait Gallery from April to September 2015.[51] In July, 2016, the first large scale exhibition devoted solely to his work was held at the Weiss Gallery in London.[52]
Johnson's name is attached to the Johnson portrait of William Shakespeare in the Folger Shakespeare Library.[55] This was painted around 1610 and has a long association with Shakespeare. It was altered to show a higher forehead. It is no longer believed to be by Johnson.
Name
The large number of variants of his name has led to some controversy over the correct form. Johnson himself must take some responsibility for this since he frequently changed his signature.[56] Hearn has argued that in his later years in the Netherlands, he added the words "van Ceulen" ("from Cologne") to his signature as a marketing technique to emphasize his foreign origins. He had previously added "Londines" (London) to his signature, but stopped using this form following the outbreak of the first Anglo-Dutch war in 1652.
Finberg says "I think I may take this opportunity to protest once again against the prevalent habit of calling this artist Janssens. In spite of Walpole's unfortunate remark that this is the correct form of the name, there is no excuse for using it. While in England the artist invariably spelt his name Cornelius Johnson, and when he left England he changed the form to Jonson. The usual form of his signature when the name is given in full is invariably, in all the pictures painted after 1643 which I have seen: ' Cornelius Jonson van Ceulen.' He appears never to have adopted the form of Janson, Jansen, or Janssens. But so long as auctioneers are born with an ingrained conviction that a foreign-looking name gives greater value to a picture than an English name, so long may we expect to find Cornelius Johnson or Jonson masquerading in catalogues as Cornelius Janssens."[57]
↑ Edmond, M Limners and Picturemakers – New light on the lives of miniaturists and large-scale portrait-painters working in London in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Walpole Society, volume 47, page 87
↑ Hearn, Karen, ed. (2009). Van Dyck in Britain. Tate Publishing. p.153.
1 2 Kirby, Jo (1999) The Painter's Trade in the 17th Century, National Portrait Gallery Technical Bulletin 20
↑ Edmond, M Limners and Picturemakers – New light on the lives of miniaturists and large-scale portrait-painters working in London in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Walpole Society, volume 47, page 89
1 2 Finberg, Alexander J (1917). "Two Anonymous Portraits by Cornelius Johnson". Walpole Society. 6.
↑ Hearn, Karen, 2003, "The English Career of Cornelius Johnson" in Roding, Juliette Dutch and Flemish Artists in Britain 1550–1800, Primavera, page 116
↑ Cust, Lionel Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900, volume 29
↑ Tarkington, Booth (1939). Some Old Portraits: A Book About Art and Human Beings. p.46.
↑ literally "five broad pieces of gold" – a broad piece was a hammered piece of gold worth twenty shillings (£1). Horace Walpole, Anecdotes of painters in England
↑ Cooper, Tarnya (2012). Citizen Portrait. Yale University Press. p.58.
↑ Brotton, Jerry (2007). The Sale of the Late King's Goods. Pan. p.160.
↑ Prices are discussed by Ellis Waterhouse in Painting in Britain: 1530–1790
↑ Chivers, Ian, ed. (2004). Oxford Dictionary of Art (thirded.). Oxford University Press. p.365.
↑ Town, Edward; David, Jessica (2016). "The Early Career of Cornelius Johnson". Cornelius Johnson, Painter to King and Country. The Weiss Gallery. pp.18–35.
↑ Hearn, Karen (2015). Cornelius Johnson. Paul Holberton publishing. p. 8
↑ Titler, Robert (2013). The face of the city (paperbacked.). Manchester University Press. p.56.
↑ Hearn, Karen, ed. (2009). Van Dyck in Britain. Tate Publishing. p.13.
↑ Reynolds, Anna (2013). In Fine Style:The Art of Tudor and Stuart Fashions. Royal Collections Trust. p.143.
↑ Town, Edward; David, Jessica (2016). "The Early Career of Cornelius Johnson". Cornelius Johnson, Painter to King and Country. The Weiss Gallery. p.24.
↑ quoted from Hearn, Karen, 2003, "The English Career of Cornelius Johnson" in Roding, Juliette Dutch and Flemish Artists in Britain 1550–1800, Primavera, page 124
1 2 Hearn, Karen (2016). "The National & Professional Identities of Cornelius Johnson". Cornelius Johnson, Painter to King and Country. The Weiss Gallery. p.8.
↑ Hearn, Karen (2015). Cornelius Johnson. Paul Holberton publishing. p.68.
↑ Alexander J Finberg, A CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF PORTRAITS BY CORNELIUS JOHNSON, OR JONSON (Walpole Society, Volume 10, 1922)
Related Research Articles
William Dobson was a portraitist and one of the first significant English painters, praised by his contemporary John Aubrey as "the most excellent painter that England has yet bred". He died relatively young and his final years were disrupted by the English Civil War.
Hans Eworth was a Flemish painter active in England in the mid-16th century. Along with other exiled Flemings, he made a career in Tudor London, painting allegorical images as well as portraits of the gentry and nobility. About 40 paintings are now attributed to Eworth, among them portraits of Mary I and Elizabeth I. Eworth also executed decorative commissions for Elizabeth's Office of the Revels in the early 1570s.
Sir Anthony van Dyck was a Flemish Baroque artist who became the leading court painter in England after success in the Spanish Netherlands and Italy.
Sir Peter Lely was a painter of Dutch origin whose career was nearly all spent in England, where he became the dominant portrait painter to the court. He became a naturalised British subject and was knighted in 1679.
John Souch was an English portrait painter. He flourished in the early seventeenth century in the North West of England, and perhaps epitomises the role of art in English local life at that time.
Marcus Gheeraerts was a Flemish artist working at the Tudor court, described as "the most important artist of quality to work in England in large-scale between Eworth and van Dyck" He was brought to England as a child by his father Marcus Gheeraerts the Elder, also a painter. He became a fashionable portraitist in the last decade of the reign of Elizabeth I under the patronage of her champion and pageant-master Sir Henry Lee. He introduced a new aesthetic in English court painting that captured the essence of a sitter through close observation. He became a favorite portraitist of James I's queen Anne of Denmark, but fell out of fashion in the late 1610s.
Paul van Somer, also known as Paulus van Somer, was a Flemish artist who arrived in England from Antwerp during the reign of King James I of England and became one of the leading painters of the royal court. He painted a number of portraits both of James and his consort, Queen Anne of Denmark, and of nobles such as Ludovic Stuart, earl of Lennox, Elizabeth Stanley, Countess of Huntingdon, and Lady Anne Clifford. He is sometimes designated as "Paul van Somer I" to distinguish him from the engraver of the same name who was active in England between 1670 and 1694.
Adriaen Hanneman was a Dutch Golden Age painter best known for his portraits of the exiled British royal court. His style was strongly influenced by his contemporary, Anthony van Dyck.
The artists of the Tudor court are the painters and limners engaged by the monarchs of England's Tudor dynasty and their courtiers between 1485 and 1603, from the reign of Henry VII to the death of Elizabeth I.
John Michael Wright was an English or Scottish portrait painter in the Baroque style. Wright trained in Edinburgh under the Scots painter George Jamesone, and acquired a considerable reputation as an artist and scholar during a long sojourn in Rome. There he was admitted to the Accademia di San Luca and was associated with some of the leading artists of his generation. He was engaged by Archduke Leopold Wilhelm of Austria, the governor of the Spanish Netherlands, to acquire artworks in Oliver Cromwell's England in 1655. He took up permanent residence in England from 1656 and served as court painter before and after the English Restoration. A convert to Roman Catholicism, he was a favourite of the restored Stuart court, a client of both Charles II and James II, and was a witness to many of the political manoeuvrings of the era. In the final years of the Stuart monarchy he returned to Rome as part of an embassy to Pope Innocent XI.
Robert Peake the Elder was an English painter active in the later part of Elizabeth I's reign and for most of the reign of James I. In 1604, he was appointed picture maker to the heir to the throne, Prince Henry; and in 1607, serjeant-painter to King James I – a post he shared with John De Critz.
Cornelis or Cornelius Ketel was a Dutch Mannerist painter, active in Elizabethan London from 1573 to 1581, and in Amsterdam till his death. Ketel, known essentially as a portrait-painter, was also a poet and orator, and from 1595 a sculptor as well.
Steven van der Meulen was a Flemish artist active c. 1543–1563. He gained prominence in England in the first decade of the reign of Elizabeth I as one of many Flemish artists active at the Tudor court.
Josef van Aken, known in England as Joseph van Aken and Joseph Van Aken of Heacken was a Flemish genre, portrait and drapery painter who spent most of his career in England. Initially successful in England with his fashionable conversation pieces and other genre scenes, he gradually specialised as a drapery painter. Drapery painters were specialist painters who completed the dress, costumes and other accessories worn by the subjects of portrait paintings. They worked for portrait painters with a large clientele. He was recognised as one of the foremost drapery painters active in mid-18th-century England and was employed in that capacity by many leading and lesser known portrait painters of his time.
The Lenthall pictures were a number of paintings owned by the Lenthall family and housed at Burford Priory. The collection was publicly commented on by art historians and tourists. It was largely dispersed in two sales in 1808 and 1833, although some works were retained by the family and sold in the late 20th century.
Sir Thomas Richard Fiennes Barrett-Lennard, 5th Baronet, was a British banker who had served as vice-chairman of Norwich Union and Chairman of the East Anglian Trustee Savings Bank.
The Whitehall group is a term applied to a small circle of art connoisseurs, collectors, and patrons, closely associated with King Charles I, who introduced a taste for the Italian old masters to England. The term usually includes the advisors and agents who facilitated the group's acquisition of works of art.
Cornelis Jonson van Ceulen the Younger (1634–1715), was an English painter active in the Netherlands.
Karen Hearn is a British art historian and curator. She has Master's degrees from the University of Cambridge and the University of London. She is an Honorary Professor in the Department of English Language and Literature at the University College London. From 1992 to 2012 Hearn was the Curator of 16th & 17th Century British Art at the Tate where she curated major exhibitions on Tudor and Jacobean paintings, Anthony van Dyck, and Rubens. She was co-curator of Royalist Refugees at The Rubenshuis in Antwerp. She has also curated recent exhibitions at The National Portrait Gallery in London, The Harley Gallery, and The Foundling Museum. She was elected as a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London on 1 January 2005.
Diana Cecil, Countess of Oxford (1596-1654) was an English aristocrat.
References
Finberg, AJ, (1918). Two Anonymous Portraits by Cornelius Johnson Walpole Society
Finberg, Alexande Joseph, (1922). A Chronological List of Portraits by Cornelius Johnson, Or Jonson, Walpole Society
Hearn, Karen, (2003). "The English Career of Cornelius Johnson" in Roding, Juliette Dutch and Flemish Artists in Britain 1550–1800, Primavera Pers
Hearn, Karen (2015). Cornelius Johnson. Paul Holberton publishing.
Cornelius Johnson, Painter to King and Country. The Weiss Gallery. 2016.
Hearn, Karen (2018). "The 'small oil colour pictures' of Cornelius Johnson (1593-1661)". Portrait Miniatures, Artists, Functions & Collections. The Tansey Miniatures Foundation. pp.179–88.
Further reading
Ellis Waterhouse, "Painting in Britain, 1530–1790", 4th ed., 1978, Penguin Books (now Yale History of Art series)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
