Dejan Jovićand Stjepo Bartulica in HKD Napredak,Zagreb (2016).
Dejan Jovićhas been a Jean Monnet Fellow at the European University Institute in Florence and a lecturer at the ScottishUniversity of Stirling.[13] At the University of Stirling Jovićwas founder and director of the Centre for European Neighborhood Studies.[2] Since 2015 he is guest professor at the University of Belgrade.[1] Dejan Jovićis the main editor of the Croatian Political Science Review journal since 2013.[1] According to SCImago Journal Rank the Croatian Political Science Review was Q1 best quartile journal in the field of History in 2018.[14] It was the sixth highest ranked political science and international relations journal in the entire Eastern Europe and 257th internationally among 503 ranked journals.[15][16] In the field of History it was 10th among 109 ranked journals in Eastern Europe and 278th among 1217 ranked journals internationally.[17][18]
Marksističke teorije međunarodnih odnosa (English:Marxist Theories of International Relations). Zagreb:Faculty of Political Science. 2018.
Konstruktivističke teorije međunarodnih odnosa (English:Constructivist Theories of International Relations). Zagreb:Faculty of Political Science. 2016.
Liberalne teorije međunarodnih odnosa (English:Liberal Theories of International Relations). Zagreb:Političke analize &Faculty of Political Science. 2014.
Teorije međunarodnih odnosa:Realizam (English:Theories of International Relations:Realism). Zagreb:Politička kultura. 2013.
Slobodan Milošević:put ka vlasti (English:Slobodan Milošević:Road to Power). Belgrade &Stirling:Institute for Contemporary History &Centre for European Neighbourhood Studies. 2008.
2019 election "Do you know how it is to be a Serb in Croatia?" jumbo poster in Vukovar with added graffiti stating "To be above the law".
In 2019,Jovićwas on the election list of the Independent Democratic Serb Party for the 2019 European Parliament election in Croatia.[21] In an interview for Italian Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa he explain his motivation to run as a non-party candidate on SDSS list by "desire to influence European politics" particularly related to Western Balkan integrations,academic duty to take active part in political life and to "express my solidarity with the Serbian community,not so much because of ethnicity,but because I think that the Serbian community is a trait of Croatia as a country".[21] Jovićwas second on the list,just behind party leader Milorad Pupovac.[22] Campaign was marked by SDSS jumbo posters with inscription "Do you know how it is to be a Serb in Croatia?" in which the word 'Serb' was written in Serbian Cyrillic.[22] As it was expected by campaign leaders jumbo posters were target of widespread nationalist vandalism and destruction which underlined the issue of ethnic intolerance and discrimination.[22] The party did not manage to reach 5% threshold to enter the European Parliament and instead received 28,597 votes or 2.66% yet some commentators perceived campaign as an important public relations success and results as expected.[23]
Criticism and controversies
Jugoslavija –država koja je odumrla
Dejan Jovićand his book Jugoslavija –država koja je odumrla (Yugoslavia:A State that Withered Away),published in 2003,were heavily criticized by the Serbian historian and professor of history at University of BelgradeOlivera Milosavljević[sr] in reviews and articles published by now inactive Serbian weekly magazine Republika where she claimed that the book contains numerous falsehoods,contradictions and un-academic methodology,citing his downplay of the SANU Memorandum and describing an apologetic depiction of Slobodan Milošević,among other things.[24][25]
2014 book review
In 2014,when serving as the senior advisor to the President of Croatia,in his book review for the Croatian Political Science Review Jovićexpress approval of the book First Do No Harm:Humanitarian Intervention and the Destruction of Yugoslavia written by David N. Gibbs and published by the Vanderbilt University Press in 2009.[26] Gibbs' book was criticized by Marko Hoare who accused Gibbs of denying the genocide in Srebrenica,promoting conspiracy theories and eschewing or falsifying sources.[27] Jović's positive review of the book caused the North American Congress of Bosniaks of "silently denyingSerbian aggression and genocide".[28] Hoare previously criticized Jović's own book Slobodan Milošević's Place in Serbian History,accusing the author of being an apologist of Slobodan Miloševićand the Yugoslav People's Army during the war in the 1990s.[29][30] Jovićresponded by stating that the accusations are "completely tendentious and incorrect,and the campaign itself has political rather than academic motives",he also defended Gibbs by claiming he had never denied genocide in Srebrenica,that he is a distinguished professor of history at the University of Arizona whose book had a number of positive reviews in academic journals,and that the same people who are now accusing him as a genocide denier for a book review have previously accused many others of the same,including the Washington Times and The Guardian.[31] His claims were,however,disputed by Hoare in a subsequent response to his response which stated:"It is dangerous to both Croatia and Bosnia and Hercegovina for someone holding such views,and with such poor analytical judgement and grasp of reality,to occupy the position that he does."[29][32]
2014 remarks on the 1991 Independence referendum
During the same year,Jovićwas sacked from his political advisory position by president Ivo Josipovićafter he claimed in his articleArchived 2014-10-04 at theWayback Machine that 1991 Croatian independence referendum was "very non-liberal. Maybe they were 'democratic' if by 'democracy' we mean only the determination of those who have more and who less [votes]. But they were certainly not liberal"[33] and that it can not be compared with Scottish independence referendum arguing that,unlike the Croatian one,every opinion was considered legitimate and was equally present in public debate. This statement was described by president Josipovićas "harmful and wrong" who expressed his opinion on incomparability of situation in Croatia (Yugoslav crisis) and Scotland (established democracy) at the time of two referendums.[34] President sacked Jovićquoting differences of opinion shortly before the 2014–15 Croatian presidential election,while politicians from major opposition right-wing Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) expressed opinion that he was sacked because his opinions were damaging Josipović's re-election prospects.[35] The left-leaning British political website OpenDemocracy opined that sacking of Jovićwas the result of "(re)establishment of a certain dogmatism in interpreting or discussing about the past".[36]Balkan Insight described Jović's statements as "highly controversial",and cited denunciations by some politicians from both Social Democratic Party (SDP) and HDZ,while 24sata columnist Tomislav Klauški criticised Josipović's move instead and asked if it is possible to comment meaningfully and non-passionately the independence referendum 23 years after it took place.[33]
In 2017,a docent at the Faculty of Political Sciences in the University of Zagreb,Krešimir Petković,filed a request for Jovićto be removed from the editorial board of Croatian Political Science Review,accusing him of "giving academic legitimacy to forgeries" and the "absence of academic procedures of fact checking" following the publication of an article on Croatia–Slovenia border disputes by German political scientist and European People's Party spokesman Thomas Bickl.[38] Petkovićclaimed that the article was uncritical towards the Drnovšek–Račan agreement and that without evidence Bickl ascribed agreement's failure to Croatian traumatic experience in the period of the Croatian War of Independence.[38] Petkovićultimately resigned from the position of one of the reviewers for the journal.[38]
In 2021,following Jović's statements on Twitter,[39] in which he described President Zoran Milanović's remarks towards Bosnia and Herzegovina and Milorad Pupovac as "cultural racism",he was subsequently described by Milanovićas a "Kumrovec undertail" in a Facebook post on his official profile.[40] In his Facebook response,Milanovićcriticized Jovićfor publishing his post in English,berated his scholarly credibility and electoral legitimacy of Milorad Pupovac,stated that a Croat from Vojvodina would never dare to speak like Jovićand described Belgrade as a bazaar.[40]
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
