Directive 2011/61/EU

Last updated

Directive 2011/61/EU
European Union directive
Text with EEA relevance
Flag of Europe.svg
TitleAlternative Investment Fund Managers Directive
Made by European Parliament and Council of the European Union
Made underArt. 53
Journal reference L 174, 1 July 2011, p. 1–73
History
Date made8 June 2011
Came into force21 July 2011 [1]
Current legislation

Directive 2011/61/EU is a legal act of the European Union on the financial regulation of hedge funds, private equity, real estate funds, and other "Alternative Investment Fund Managers" (AIFMs) in the European Union. [1] [2] The Directive requires all covered AIFMs to obtain authorisation, and make various disclosures as a condition of operation. It followed the global financial crisis. Before, the alternative investment industry had not been regulated at EU level. [3] [4]

Contents

It was reported in May 2014 that only one-third of EU member states had successfully implemented the directive into law. [5] As of 2014, the countries that had transposed Directive 2011/61/EU into law include Cyprus, the Czech Republic, the United Kingdom, Luxembourg, [6] (Germany), [7] France, [8] Malta and Ireland. [9] In December 2014, the European Commission issued a formal warning to countries including Spain, Latvia and Poland for not complying with implementation of Directive 2011/61/EU. [10]

Background

Directive 2011/61/EU was prompted as part of a wider regulatory effort undertaken by G20 nations following the global market downturn of 2008. [11] [4] [12] Provisions of Directive 2011/61/EU include increasing transparency by AIFMs [1] [13] [14] and assuring that national supervisors, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), [15] [16] and the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) have the information they need to monitor financial systems in the EU. [16] [17] Directive 2011/61/EU also is intended to protect investors. [2]

On the need for the directive, an explanatory document from the European Commission stated that AIFMs had become "very significant actors in the European financial system, managing a large quantity of assets on behalf of pension funds and other investors; accounting for a significant proportion of trading activity in financial markets; and constituting an important source of counterparty risk for other market participants" and that they had "contributed to the build-up of leverage in the financial system, the consequences of which for the stability of financial markets became apparent when leverage in the hedge fund sector was rapidly unwound during the crisis". [18]

When the directive was approved by the European Parliament, José Manuel Barroso, then President of the European Commission, said "The adoption of the directive means that hedge funds and private equity will no longer operate in a regulatory void outside the scope of supervisors. The new regime brings transparency and security to the way these funds are managed and operate, which adds to the overall stability of our financial system." [19]

Contents

Ch I, General provisions

The scope of the application of the directive is defined. The directives apply to EU AIFMs which manage one or more AIFs irrespective of whether such AIFs are EU AIFs or non-EU AIFs; non-EU AIFMs which manage one or more EU AIFs; and non-EU AIFMs which market one or more AIFs in the Union irrespective of whether such AIFs are EU AIFs or non-EU AIFs. [20] Specific entities that are exempt from the directives are also listed.

Ch II, Authorisation

An AIFM must be authorised with the AIFM's home state regulator for AIFMs that have assets under management in AIFs above the thresholds of: (1) 100 million EUR, if the AIF uses leverage; or (2) 500 million EUR, if the AIF does not use leverage. [21]

Ch III, Operating conditions for AIFMs

The reporting regulations of Directive 2011/61/EU require each AIF to be named using a series of codes, including its national identification code, the Bank Identifier Code (BIC) and the Legal Entity Identifier code. [22] [23] AIFMs must select only brokers and counterparties that are subject to regulatory supervision, that are financially sound, and that have the necessary organizational structure to provide services to the AIFM or the AIF. [22] All AIFMs must submit quarterly, semi-annual, or annual reports to their respective member state regulator with information about the AIFM and its AIFs as well as an annual report with information such as the fund's financial statements, activities, and information about the total amount of remuneration paid by the AIFM to its staff. [22]

Chs IV-V, Transparency requirements

Special requirements apply to AIFMs using leverage. AIFMs are required to disclose the extent of the leverage employed within their funds, and prove that leverage in any fund has been limited to a reasonable amount. [24] The scope of Directive 2011/61/EU requirements that apply to AIFMs are different, depending on whether the AIFM is engaged in portfolio or risk management activities within the EU or markets its funds to EU investors. Each fund can only have one AIFM, though the AIFM can delegate certain functions to other entities. EU AIFMs became subject to all of the provisions of Directive 2011/61/EU once it was implemented at the EU member state level. [25] Authorised fund managers located within the EU are permitted to market their EU funds to professional investors in any EU member state under what Directive 2011/61/EU calls a passport. [25]

The reporting requirements of Directive 2011/61/EU apply to all AIFMs who manage or market alternative funds within the EU. [26] To fulfill the reporting requirements, AIFMs must file an Annex IV report within 30 days of the end of the applicable reporting period, which is determined by the amount of an AIFM's assets under management. Reporting periods range from quarterly to half-yearly to annually. [23] The Annex IV report is a government regulatory document comprising 41 questions, analysing a fund's investment portfolios, exposures, leverage ratios, liquidity and risk analysis. [27] [28]

In chapter V, section 2, articles 26–30, additional obligations apply for AIFs acquiring controlling influence in non-listed companies. This is essentially directed at private equity firms, and partly aims to stop asset stripping. Article 26(5) defines "control" as holding over 50% of voting rights, including as a ‘club deal’. This was watered down from 30% in the draft (formerly in article 26(1)(a)). Article 27(1) states that funds have to notify investee companies and shareholders when they acquire control, and article 28(4) requires them to disclose the acquisition to stakeholder groups including employees or representatives via the investee's board. Article 29 places an obligation on the central Private Equity management company (rather than an investee companies) to give information on operational and financial developments in firm's annual reports. Article 30 lists distribution requirements, which are intended to prevent asset stripping in the first 24 months from acquiring control).

Chs VI-VIII, Marketing and passport

For the purposes of the directive, marketing is defined as any offering or placement (sale) of an AIF at the initiative of the AIFM, or on behalf of the AIFM, to investors domiciled in the EU. [29] [30] Member state laws and rules determine whether a fund is engaged in marketing for purposes of the directive. [31]

EU funds managed by EU managers may be marketed across the EU under the passport of Directive 2011/61/EU, provided the manager complies with all of the requirements of the directive. [30] EU or non-EU funds managed by non-EU managers may currently be marketed within the EU only under national private placement regimes, as non-EU managers cannot obtain the marketing passport. [32] Likewise, non-EU funds managed by EU managers may only be marketed under the private placement regimes. Funds marketed under national private placement regimes are subject to compliance with certain provisions of Directive 2011/61/EU related to reporting, regulatory co-operation agreements, and the jurisdiction of the fund and the manager not being listed as a "non-cooperative country and territory" by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). [33]

Non-EU Passports

In 2015, an analyst for EurActiv.com, a European news and policy website, expressed concern that the directive puts non-EU funds at a disadvantage. [33] [34] In 2015, the European Securities and Markets Authority initiated a consultation to discuss issuing new rules to allow EU AIFMs to market their non-EU AIFs under the passport of Directive 2011/61/EU, and likewise for non-EU managers to market their funds under the passport. [33] [35] [36] In July 2016 AIFM concluded that there were no fundamental obstacles to issuing passports to Canada, Guernsey, Japan, Jersey and Switzerland, seven other non-EU countries are also under consideration. [37]

Implementation

The directive came into force on 21 July 2011. [1] [38] On 16 November 2011, ESMA issued technical advice to the European Commission (EC) on possible implementation measures for Directive 2011/61/EU. [39] On 19 December 2012, the EC added a series of new regulations to supplement the text. [1] [22] EU member states were required to write Directive 2011/61/EU into national law by no later than 22 July 2013. [1] [40] [41] [42] As of July 2014, not every EU member state had transposed Directive 2011/61/EU into national law. [43] Some, but not all, member states provided for a one-year transition period, beginning 22 July 2013, before AIFMs would become subject to the requirements of Directive 2011/61/EU. [1] [38]

The directive has so far been supplemented by three Level II Regulations:

The European Securities and Markets Authority has also issued a number of guidelines to national competent authorities including on key concepts of Directive 2011/61/EU [45] and remuneration. [46]

Principality of Liechtenstein (1 April 2013)

Since 1 April 2013, the FMA Liechtenstein accepts applications for authorisation of AIFMs and AIFs as well as other persons and entities requiring authorisation under the AIFM Act. [47] On 30 September 2016, the EEA Joint Committee, whose decisions result in the inclusion of new EU law in the EEA Agreement, decided to incorporate the first package of legal acts relating to the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs). [48]

Malta (27 June 2013)

On 27 June 2013 (the measures were released on 25 June 2013) Malta became the first EU Member State to complete the transposition of the requirements of the Directive into national law. [49] The Maltese legislator and the Malta Financial Services Authority transposed the requirements of the Directive by means of a series of regulations issued under the Investment Services Act (Cap. 370, Laws of Malta) and a number of new MFSA rulebooks. [50] = EU-Passport

Luxembourg (12 July 2013)

In Luxembourg, the AIFM directive was transposed into national law on 12 July 2013. [51] According to the 2013 law an entity – in order to become an AIFM – will have to submit an application to, and obtain authorisation from, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF). The application must include information on the directors of the AIFM, its shareholders, and the alternative investment funds (AIF), which it intends to manage and demonstrate how the entity will comply with the requirements of the AIFM Law. [52]

France (27 July 2013)

The AIFM directive was transposed into France's national law on 27 July 2013. [53]

Reception

In a study conducted by Multifonds in June 2014, 72% of respondents from the EU and Canada said they expected non-EU managers to set up European operations in order to take advantage of Directive 2011/61/EU. [54] In a 2014 study conducted by Preqin, 71% of American fund managers said they believed Directive 2011/61/EU would have a negative effect on the industry. [55] [56] Fund managers from within the EU, Asia and the rest of the world excluding the United States reported in 2014 [57] and 2015 [58] that Directive 2011/61/EU was costing them more than they had expected it to. [59] Criticism of the costs of the legislation comes partly from industry lobbyists. [34]

According to a study conducted by Deloitte, [60] most of the UK-based asset managers think that the AIFM Directive could reduce the competitiveness of the EU's alternative investment funds industry because of the compliance the regulations impose on the industry. In addition, these managers from the hedge fund, private equity and real estate sectors believe that the directive will reduce the number of non-EU managers operating within the EU. Directive 2011/61/EU passed after contentious negotiations, especially between UK and French authorities, and because of its third-country provisions, which attracted considerable interest and engagement from U.S. authorities. [61]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD)". Financial Conduct Authority. 12 November 2014. Archived from the original on 24 January 2015. Retrieved 13 January 2015.
  2. 1 2 Dave Waller. "The long and winding road". BusinessLife.co. Retrieved 15 December 2014.
  3. ↑ Astrid B. Boening (2012). The EU as a Global Player. Fundación Univ. San Pablo. p. 36. ISBN   9788415382423 . Retrieved 20 April 2015.
  4. 1 2 Monica Gagna (15 December 2014). "Industry grapples with regulatory changes". Financial Times Advisor. Retrieved 20 April 2015.
  5. ↑ Bill Prew (23 May 2014). "AIFMD update: only a third of EU states have implemented rules". Investment Europe. Retrieved 21 July 2015.
  6. ↑ Sophie Baker (28 January 2013). "Countries lag on AIFMD implementation". Financial News. Retrieved 21 July 2015.
  7. ↑ Becky Pritchard (3 March 2014). "AIFMD rules put Germany on the sidelines". Financial News. Retrieved 21 July 2015.
  8. ↑ "Germany, France 'gold-plating' AIFMD rules, says survey". FTSE Global Markets. 11 October 2013. Retrieved 21 July 2015.
  9. ↑ Donnacha O'Connor (27 June 2014). "Ireland – Status of the AIFMD implemention". Hedgeweek. Retrieved 21 July 2015.
  10. ↑ Neil Robson (8 December 2014). "AIFM Directive – Latvia, Poland and Spain Warned by European Commission for Failing to Fully Implement New Investment Fund Rules". The National Law Review. Retrieved 21 July 2015.
  11. ↑ Astrid B. Boening (2012). The EU as a Global Player. Fundación Univ. San Pablo. p. 36. ISBN   9780191641213 . Retrieved 20 April 2015.
  12. ↑ G20/OECD High-Level Principles of Long Term Investing Financing by Institutional Investors (PDF) (Report). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. September 2013.
  13. ↑ "COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) supplementing Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to exemptions, general operating conditions, depositaries, leverage, transparency and supervision" (PDF). European Commission. 19 December 2012. Retrieved 20 April 2015.
  14. ↑ "Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the council". European Commission. 21 April 2004. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
  15. ↑ Ivy Schmerken (30 July 2014). "Hedge Funds Face Compliance Hurdles of AIFMD". Wallstreet and Tech. Archived from the original on 9 April 2015. Retrieved 15 December 2014.
  16. 1 2 Jonathan Boyd (1 October 2013). "ESMA clarifies final guidelines on reporting obligations under AIFMD". Investment Europe. Retrieved 20 April 2015.
  17. ↑ Niamh Moloney (2014). EU Securities and Financial Markets Regulation. Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780199664344 . Retrieved 20 April 2015.
  18. ↑ "Directive on Alternative Investment Fund Managers ('AIFMD'): Frequently Asked Questions". 11 November 2010. Retrieved 16 September 2015.
  19. ↑ "European Commission statement at the occasion of the European Parliament vote on the directive on hedge funds and private equity". 11 November 2010. Retrieved 16 September 2015.
  20. ↑ "Official Journal L 174/2011". eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 23 July 2016.
  21. ↑ Neil Robson (24 October 2014). "AIFM Directive for US Private Fund Managers". The National Law Review. Retrieved 20 April 2015.
  22. 1 2 3 4 The European Commission (19 December 2012). Regulations (Report). Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved 17 December 2014.
  23. 1 2 "Consultation paper: guidelines on reporting obligations under Article 3 and Article 4 of the AIFMD" (PDF). European Securities and Market Authority. 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2015.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  24. ↑ "Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive: AIFMs managing leveraged AIFs" (PDF). Financial Services Commission. 2013: 3–5. Retrieved 13 January 2015.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  25. 1 2 William Younge (30 July 2013). "AIFMD's Impact on Non-EU Managers of Non-EU Alternative Investment Funds". Mondaq Business Briefing. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
  26. ↑ "SEI introduces AIFMD Annex IV reporting solution". HedgeWeek. 12 September 2014. Retrieved 15 December 2014.
  27. ↑ Becca Lipman. "This is Why AIFMD Annex IV Reports Demand More Attention". Wallstreet & Technology. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
  28. ↑ CME Group (7 July 2014). "2014 Q2 Webinar Programme". COOConnect. Retrieved 19 December 2014.
  29. ↑ "AIFM Directive for US Private Fund Managers". The National Law Review. 24 October 2014. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  30. 1 2 David Lawrence (8 April 2014). "AIFMD: Time to Back Up on Reverse Solicitation". FIN Alternatives. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  31. ↑ Tim Clipstone (27 June 2014). "The British Virgin Islands – AIFMD one year on". HedgeWeek. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  32. ↑ Michelle Moran (30 March 2015). "AIFMD offers passport to European markets". Financial Times Advisor. Retrieved 21 July 2015.
  33. 1 2 3 "Why competition is vital to Europe's investors". EurActiv.com. 15 January 2015. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  34. 1 2 Saul Griffith (21 July 2014). "The AIFMD Deadline Tomorrow: Is The Industry Ready?". ValueWalk. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  35. ↑ "Uncertainty over extent to which AIFMD passport will be afforded to non-EU managers". COO Connect. 16 February 2015. Retrieved 22 July 2015.
  36. ↑ "Call for evidence on AIFMD passport and third country AIFMs". ESMA. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
  37. ↑ "EXTENSION OF FUNDS PASSPORT TO 12 NON-EU COUNTRIES". ESMA.
  38. 1 2 "UCITS V – an update". The Lawyer. 9 December 2014. Retrieved 16 December 2014.
  39. ↑ European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (16 November 2011). ESMA's technical advice to the European Commission on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (PDF) (Report). Retrieved 17 December 2014.
  40. ↑ Jonathan Boyd (31 May 2013). "ESMA approves Guernsey AIFMD cooperation agreement". Investment Europe. Retrieved 19 December 2014.
  41. ↑ Tim Clipstone (27 June 2014). "The British Virgin Islands – AIFMD one year on". Hedgeweek. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
  42. ↑ "Half of managers yet to apply for AIFMD authorisation, survey finds". COOConnect.com. 14 July 2014. Retrieved 15 December 2014.
  43. ↑ AIFMDTransposition (PDF) (Report). KPMG. 22 July 2014. Retrieved 17 December 2014.
  44. ↑ "European Commission Publishes AIFMD Level 2 Implementing Regulation". ganadoadvocates.com. 19 December 2012.
  45. ↑ "ESMA publishes final guidelines on Key Concepts of AIFMD". ganadoadvocates.com. 26 May 2013.
  46. ↑ "ESMA publishes final guidelines on AIFM remuneration". ganadoadvocates.com. 15 February 2013.
  47. ↑ "FMA - Authorization". Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 11 December 2016.
  48. ↑ "LLV".
  49. ↑ "Malta publishes final AIFMD implementing measures: Malta is open for AIFMD business". ganadoadvocates.com. 25 June 2013.
  50. ↑ "MFSA Statement on the AIFMD. Retrieved on 27 June 2013" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 February 2018. Retrieved 14 June 2020.
  51. ↑ "Laws, regulations and other texts". CSSF. Retrieved 6 October 2014.
  52. ↑ "AIFMD". Luxembourg Fund Partners. Retrieved 6 October 2014.
  53. ↑ "La directive AIFM est en vigueur en France". AMF.
  54. ↑ Fishburn Hedges (10 September 2012). "Two-thirds of fund admin industry believes AIFMD will be a catalyst for the convergence of long-only and hedge funds". Media Centre. Multifonds. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  55. ↑ Ivy Schmerken (17 July 2014). "Hedge Fund Readiness for AIFMD Is Lacking as Deadline Approaches". Wall Street & Tech. Archived from the original on 22 July 2015. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
  56. ↑ Simon Jessop (21 July 2014). "Foreign hedge funds could lose as Europe tightens rules". Reuters. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
  57. ↑ Vittorio Hernandez (11 August 2014). "Minority of Infrastructure and Real Estate Fund Managers Believe AIFMD Has Positive Impact". International Business Times. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
  58. ↑ Nishant Kumar (16 February 2015). "European hedge funds close at record pace as higher costs, poor returns bite". Reuters. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
  59. ↑ Sandra Kilhof (15 November 2014). "AIFMD compliance falls behind". World Finance: The Voice of the Market. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
  60. ↑ "AIFMD". Deloitte Luxembourg.
  61. ↑ Prabhakar, Rahul (1 June 2013). "Varieties of Regulation: How States Pursue and Set International Financial Standards". Oxford University GEG. SSRN   2383445.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)

Related Research Articles

A hedge fund is a pooled investment fund that trades in relatively liquid assets and is able to make extensive use of more complex trading, portfolio-construction, and risk management techniques in an attempt to improve performance, such as short selling, leverage, and derivatives. Financial regulators generally restrict hedge fund marketing to institutional investors, high net worth individuals, and accredited investors.

In finance, a contract for difference (CFD) is a legally binding agreement that creates, defines, and governs mutual rights and obligations between two parties, typically described as "buyer" and "seller", stipulating that the buyer will pay to the seller the difference between the current value of an asset and its value at contract time. If the closing trade price is higher than the opening price, then the seller will pay the buyer the difference, and that will be the buyer’s profit. The opposite is also true. That is, if the current asset price is lower at the exit price than the value at the contract’s opening, then the seller, rather than the buyer, will benefit from the difference.

Offshore fund

An offshore fund is generally a collective investment scheme domiciled in an offshore jurisdiction. Like the term "offshore company", the term is more descriptive than definitive, and both the words 'offshore' and 'fund' may be construed differently.

A depository bank or depositary bank is a specialist financial entity which, depending on jurisdiction, facilitates investment in securities markets.

Directive 2014/65/EU European Union law

Directive 2014/65/EU, commonly known as MiFID 2, is a legal act of the European Union. Together with Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 it provides a legal framework for securities markets, investment intermediaries, and trading venues. The directive provides harmonised regulation for investment services of the member states of the European Economic Area — the EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein. Its main objectives are to increase competition and investor protection, and level the playing field for market participants in investment services. It repeals Directive 2004/39/EC.

The Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive (UCITS) 2009/65/EC is a consolidated EU directive that allows collective investment schemes to operate freely throughout the EU on the basis of a single authorisation from one member state. EU member states are entitled to have additional regulatory requirements for the benefit of investors.

A non-banking financial institution (NBFI) or non-bank financial company (NBFC) is a financial institution that does not have a full banking license or is not supervised by a national or international banking regulatory agency. NBFC facilitate bank-related financial services, such as investment, risk pooling, contractual savings, and market brokering. Examples of these include insurance firms, pawn shops, cashier's check issuers, check cashing locations, payday lending, currency exchanges, and microloan organizations. Alan Greenspan has identified the role of NBFIs in strengthening an economy, as they provide "multiple alternatives to transform an economy's savings into capital investment which act as backup facilities should the primary form of intermediation fail."

Angelo Gordon is a global alternative investment manager founded in November 1988 by John M. Angelo and Michael L. Gordon who together ran the arbitrage department of L.F. Rothschild in the 1980s.

The Revised Payment Services Directive is an EU Directive, administered by the European Commission to regulate payment services and payment service providers throughout the European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA). The PSD's purpose was to increase pan-European competition and participation in the payments industry also from non-banks, and to provide for a level playing field by harmonizing consumer protection and the rights and obligations for payment providers and users. The key objectives of the PSD2 directive are creating a more integrated European payments market, making payments more secure and protecting consumers.

Pascal Canfin French politician

Pascal Canfin is a French politician of La République en marche (LREM) who has been serving as a Member of the European Parliament (EUP) since 2019. In the 2019 elections for the UE Parliament, he was elected in the list of Renew Europe group and serves as chair of the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee; following his initiative, the European Parliament declares in December 2019 a "climate state of emergency"

Volcker Rule

The Volcker Rule refers to § 619 of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The rule was originally proposed by American economist and former United States Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker to restrict United States banks from making certain kinds of speculative investments that do not benefit their customers. Volcker argued that such speculative activity played a key role in the financial crisis of 2007–2008. The rule is often referred to as a ban on proprietary trading by commercial banks, whereby deposits are used to trade on the bank's own accounts, although a number of exceptions to this ban were included in the Dodd-Frank law.

A specialized investment fund or SIF is a lightly regulated and tax-efficient regulatory regime in Luxembourg aimed for a broader range of eligible investors. This type of investment fund is governed by the Luxembourg law of 13 February 2007 replacing the law of 1991 defining the legal framework for institutional funds and enlarging the distribution scope to "well-informed investors". The SIF law significantly simplified the rules for setting up investment fund structures ranging from straightforward investment strategies investing in listed securities to hedge funds, real estate and private equity funds.

The European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) is an EU regulation aimed at reducing systemic counterparty and operational risk and thereby prevent future financial system collapses. Its focus is regulation of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories. It provides steer on reporting of derivative contracts, implementation of risk management standards and common rules for central counterparties and trade repositories.

Capital Requirements Regulation 2013 EU banking law

The Capital Requirements Regulation(EU) No. 575/2013 is an EU law that aims to decrease the likelihood that banks go insolvent. With the Credit Institutions Directive 2013 the Capital Requirements Regulation 2013 reflects Basel III rules on capital measurement and capital standards.

Qualifying investor alternative investment fund Irish zero-tax legal structure

Qualifying Investor Alternative Investment Fund or QIAIF is a Central Bank of Ireland regulatory classification established in 2013 for Ireland's five tax-free legal structures for holding assets. The Irish Collective Asset-management Vehicle or ICAV is the most popular of the five Irish QIAIF structures, and was designed in 2014 to rival the Cayman Island SPC; it is the main tax-free structure for foreign investors holding Irish assets.

Kapitalanlagegesetzbuch German Investment Code for investment management

The Kapitalanlagegesetzbuch, abbreviated as KAGB, is the German Investment Code for investment management.

The Securities Financing Transactions Regulation (SFTR) is a body of European legislation for the regulation of securities lending and repo. It was published in the EU Official Journal on 23 December 2018.

Capital Markets Union

The Capital Markets Union (CMU) is an economic policy initiative launched by the former president of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Junker in the initial exposition of his policy agenda on 15 July 2014. The main target was to create a single market for capital in the whole territory of the EU by the end of 2019. The reasoning behind the idea was to address the issue that corporate finance relies on debt and the fact that capitals markets in Europe were not sufficiently integrated so as to protect the EU and especially the Eurozone from future crisis. The Five Presidents Report of June 2015 proposed the CMU in order to complement the Banking union of the European Union and eventually finish the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) project. The CMU is supposed to attract 2000 billion dollars more on the European capital markets, on the long-term.

Equivalence in financial services

The principle of equivalence in financial services at the European Union (EU) level is one of the instruments the Commission has at its disposal to carry out its international strategy for financial services. The principle of equivalence is materialised through an equivalence decision issued by the European Commission to a targeted country that it judges fit to have access to the European Market in financial services. The decision is unilateral, non-reciprocal and affects the targeted third country in regard to particular activities or services to which the decision is intended. The equivalence decision is issued through an assessment of the third country regulations in relation to particular services or activities in the EU. In order to do so, the Commission bases its decision on 40 provisions of EU law. Important to note, perhaps is the fact that not all have been availed but over 250 equivalence decisions were made targeting more than 30 countries worldwide.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.