# Displacement current

Last updated

In electromagnetism, displacement current density is the quantity D/t appearing in Maxwell's equations that is defined in terms of the rate of change of D, the electric displacement field. Displacement current density has the same units as electric current density, and it is a source of the magnetic field just as actual current is. However it is not an electric current of moving charges, but a time-varying electric field. In physical materials (as opposed to vacuum), there is also a contribution from the slight motion of charges bound in atoms, called dielectric polarization. Electromagnetism is a branch of physics involving the study of the electromagnetic force, a type of physical interaction that occurs between electrically charged particles. The electromagnetic force is carried by electromagnetic fields composed of electric fields and magnetic fields, is responsible for electromagnetic radiation such as light, and is one of the four fundamental interactions in nature. The other three fundamental interactions are the strong interaction, the weak interaction, and gravitation. At high energy the weak force and electromagnetic force are unified as a single electroweak force. Maxwell's equations are a set of coupled partial differential equations that, together with the Lorentz force law, form the foundation of classical electromagnetism, classical optics, and electric circuits. The equations provide a mathematical model for electric, optical, and radio technologies, such as power generation, electric motors, wireless communication, lenses, radar etc. Maxwell's equations describe how electric and magnetic fields are generated by charges, currents, and changes of the fields. An important consequence of the equations is that they demonstrate how fluctuating electric and magnetic fields propagate at a constant speed (c) in a vacuum. Known as electromagnetic radiation, these waves may occur at various wavelengths to produce a spectrum of light from radio waves to γ-rays. The equations are named after the physicist and mathematician James Clerk Maxwell, who between 1861 and 1862 published an early form of the equations that included the Lorentz force law. Maxwell first used the equations to propose that light is an electromagnetic phenomenon.

In physics, the electric displacement field, denoted by D, is a vector field that appears in Maxwell's equations. It accounts for the effects of free and bound charge within materials. "D" stands for "displacement", as in the related concept of displacement current in dielectrics. In free space, the electric displacement field is equivalent to flux density, a concept that lends understanding to Gauss's law. In the International System of Units (SI), it is expressed in units of coulomb per meter square (C⋅m−2).

## Contents

The idea was conceived by James Clerk Maxwell in his 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force, Part III in connection with the displacement of electric particles in a dielectric medium. Maxwell added displacement current to the electric current term in Ampère's Circuital Law. In his 1865 paper A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field Maxwell used this amended version of Ampère's Circuital Law to derive the electromagnetic wave equation. This derivation is now generally accepted as a historical landmark in physics by virtue of uniting electricity, magnetism and optics into one single unified theory. The displacement current term is now seen as a crucial addition that completed Maxwell's equations and is necessary to explain many phenomena, most particularly the existence of electromagnetic waves. James Clerk Maxwell was a Scottish scientist in the field of mathematical physics. His most notable achievement was to formulate the classical theory of electromagnetic radiation, bringing together for the first time electricity, magnetism, and light as different manifestations of the same phenomenon. Maxwell's equations for electromagnetism have been called the "second great unification in physics" after the first one realised by Isaac Newton. A dielectric is an electrical insulator that can be polarized by an applied electric field. When a dielectric is placed in an electric field, electric charges do not flow through the material as they do in an electrical conductor but only slightly shift from their average equilibrium positions causing dielectric polarization. Because of dielectric polarization, positive charges are displaced in the direction of the field and negative charges shift in the opposite direction. This creates an internal electric field that reduces the overall field within the dielectric itself. If a dielectric is composed of weakly bonded molecules, those molecules not only become polarized, but also reorient so that their symmetry axes align to the field. An electric current is the rate of flow of electric charge past a point or region. An electric current is said to exist when there is a net flow of electric charge through a region. In electric circuits this charge is often carried by electrons moving through a wire. It can also be carried by ions in an electrolyte, or by both ions and electrons such as in an ionized gas (plasma).

## Explanation

The electric displacement field is defined as:

${\boldsymbol {D}}=\varepsilon _{0}{\boldsymbol {E}}+{\boldsymbol {P}}\ .$ where:

ε0 is the permittivity of free space
E is the electric field intensity
P is the polarization of the medium

Differentiating this equation with respect to time defines the displacement current density, which therefore has two components in a dielectric:  (see also the "displacement current" section of the article "current density")

In electromagnetism, current density is the amount of charge per unit time that flows through a unit area of a chosen cross section. The current density vector is defined as a vector whose magnitude is the electric current per cross-sectional area at a given point in space, its direction being that of the motion of the charges at this point. In SI base units, the electric current density is measured in amperes per square metre.

${\boldsymbol {J}}_{\boldsymbol {D}}=\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {E}}}{\partial t}}+{\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {P}}}{\partial t}}\ .$ The first term on the right hand side is present in material media and in free space. It doesn't necessarily come from any actual movement of charge, but it does have an associated magnetic field, just as a current does due to charge motion. Some authors apply the name displacement current to the first term by itself. 

The second term on the right hand side, called polarization current density, comes from the change in polarization of the individual molecules of the dielectric material. Polarization results when, under the influence of an applied electric field, the charges in molecules have moved from a position of exact cancellation. The positive and negative charges in molecules separate, causing an increase in the state of polarization P. A changing state of polarization corresponds to charge movement and so is equivalent to a current, hence the term "polarization current". An electric field surrounds an electric charge, and exerts force on other charges in the field, attracting or repelling them. Electric field is sometimes abbreviated as E-field. The electric field is defined mathematically as a vector field that associates to each point in space the force per unit of charge exerted on an infinitesimal positive test charge at rest at that point. The SI unit for electric field strength is volt per meter (V/m). Newtons per coulomb (N/C) is also used as a unit of electric field strength. Electric fields are created by electric charges, or by time-varying magnetic fields. Electric fields are important in many areas of physics, and are exploited practically in electrical technology. On an atomic scale, the electric field is responsible for the attractive force between the atomic nucleus and electrons that holds atoms together, and the forces between atoms that cause chemical bonding. Electric fields and magnetic fields are both manifestations of the electromagnetic force, one of the four fundamental forces of nature.

Thus, ${\boldsymbol {I}}_{\boldsymbol {D}}=\iint _{\mathcal {S}}{\boldsymbol {J}}_{\boldsymbol {D}}\cdot \operatorname {d} \!{\boldsymbol {S}}=\iint _{\mathcal {S}}{\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {D}}}{\partial t}}\cdot \operatorname {d} \!{\boldsymbol {S}}={\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\iint _{\mathcal {S}}{\boldsymbol {D}}\cdot \operatorname {d} \!{\boldsymbol {S}}={\frac {\partial \Phi _{D}}{\partial t}}\!$ This polarization is the displacement current as it was originally conceived by Maxwell. Maxwell made no special treatment of the vacuum, treating it as a material medium. For Maxwell, the effect of P was simply to change the relative permittivity εr in the relation D = εrε0E. The relative permittivity of a material is its (absolute) permittivity expressed as a ratio relative to the vacuum permittivity.

The modern justification of displacement current is explained below.

### Isotropic dielectric case

In the case of a very simple dielectric material the constitutive relation holds:

${\boldsymbol {D}}=\varepsilon {\boldsymbol {E}}\ ,$ where the permittivity ε = ε0 εr,

In this equation the use of ε accounts for the polarization of the dielectric.

The scalar value of displacement current may also be expressed in terms of electric flux:

$I_{\mathrm {D} }=\varepsilon {\frac {\partial \Phi _{E}}{\partial t}}.$ The forms in terms of ε are correct only for linear isotropic materials. More generally ε may be replaced by a tensor, may depend upon the electric field itself, and may exhibit frequency dependence (dispersion).

For a linear isotropic dielectric, the polarization P is given by:

${\boldsymbol {P}}=\varepsilon _{0}\chi _{e}{\boldsymbol {E}}=\varepsilon _{0}(\varepsilon _{r}-1){\boldsymbol {E}}$ where χe is known as the electric susceptibility of the dielectric. Note that:

$\varepsilon =\varepsilon _{r}\varepsilon _{0}=(1+\chi _{e})\varepsilon _{0}.$ ## Necessity

Some implications of the displacement current follow, which agree with experimental observation, and with the requirements of logical consistency for the theory of electromagnetism.

### Generalizing Ampère's circuital law

#### Current in capacitors

An example illustrating the need for the displacement current arises in connection with capacitors with no medium between the plates. Consider the charging capacitor in the figure. The capacitor is in a circuit that causes equal and opposite charges to appear on the left plate and the right plate, charging the capacitor and increasing the electric field between its plates. No actual charge is transported through the vacuum between its plates. Nonetheless, a magnetic field exists between the plates as though a current were present there as well. One explanation is that a displacement currentID "flows" in the vacuum, and this current produces the magnetic field in the region between the plates according to Ampère's law: An electrically charging capacitor with an imaginary cylindrical surface surrounding the left-hand plate. Right-hand surface R lies in the space between the plates and left-hand surface L lies to the left of the left plate. No conduction current enters cylinder surface R, while current I leaves through surface L. Consistency of Ampère's law requires a displacement current ID = I to flow across surface R.
$\oint _{C}\mathbf {B} \ {\boldsymbol {\cdot }}\ \mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}=\mu _{0}I_{D}\ .$ where

• $\oint _{C}$ is the closed line integral around some closed curve C.
• $\mathbf {B}$ is the magnetic field measured in teslas.
• ${\boldsymbol {\cdot }}\$ is the vector dot product.
• $\mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}$ is an infinitesimal line element along the curve C, that is, a vector with magnitude equal to the length element of C, and direction given by the tangent to the curve C.
• $\mu _{0}\!\$ is the magnetic constant, also called the permeability of free space.
• $I_{D}\!\$ is the net displacement current that passes through a small surface bounded by the curve C.

The magnetic field between the plates is the same as that outside the plates, so the displacement current must be the same as the conduction current in the wires, that is,

$I_{D}=I\ ,$ which extends the notion of current beyond a mere transport of charge.

Next, this displacement current is related to the charging of the capacitor. Consider the current in the imaginary cylindrical surface shown surrounding the left plate. A current, say I, passes outward through the left surface L of the cylinder, but no conduction current (no transport of real charges) crosses the right surface R. Notice that the electric field between the plates E increases as the capacitor charges. That is, in a manner described by Gauss's law, assuming no dielectric between the plates:

$Q(t)=\varepsilon _{0}\oint _{\mathcal {S}}d\mathbf {\mathcal {S}} \ {\boldsymbol {\cdot }}\ {\boldsymbol {E}}(t)\ ,$ where S refers to the imaginary cylindrical surface. Assuming a parallel plate capacitor with uniform electric field, and neglecting fringing effects around the edges of the plates, differentiation provides: 

${\frac {dQ}{dt}}=-{\mathit {I}}=-\varepsilon _{0}\oint _{\mathcal {S}}d\mathbf {\mathcal {S}} \ {\boldsymbol {\cdot }}\ {\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {E}}}{\partial t}}\approx -{S}\ \varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial E}{\partial t}}\ ,$ where the sign is negative because charge leaves this plate (the charge is decreasing), and where S is the area of the surface R. The electric field at surface L is nearly zero because the field due to charge on the left-hand plate is nearly cancelled by the equal but opposite charge on the right-hand plate. Under the assumption of a uniform electric field distribution inside the capacitor, the displacement current density JD is found by dividing by the area of the surface:

$J_{D}={\frac {I_{D}}{S}}={\frac {I}{S}}=\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial E}{\partial t}}={\frac {\partial D}{\partial t}}\ ,$ where I is the current leaving the cylindrical surface (which must equal ID) and JD is the flow of charge per unit area into the cylindrical surface through the face R.

Combining these results, the magnetic field is found using the integral form of Ampère's law with an arbitrary choice of contour provided the displacement current density term is added to the conduction current density (the Ampère-Maxwell equation): 

$\oint _{\partial S}{\boldsymbol {B}}\cdot d{\boldsymbol {\ell }}=\mu _{0}\int _{S}\left({\boldsymbol {J}}+\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {E}}}{\partial t}}\right)\cdot d{\boldsymbol {S}}\,$ This equation says that the integral of the magnetic field B around a loop ∂S is equal to the integrated current J through any surface spanning the loop, plus the displacement current term ε0 E / ∂t through the surface. Example showing two surfaces S1 and S2 that share the same bounding contour ∂S. However, S1 is pierced by conduction current, while S2 is pierced by displacement current.

As depicted in the figure to the right, the current crossing surface S1 is entirely conduction current. Applying the Ampère-Maxwell equation to surface S1 yields:

$B={\frac {\mu _{0}I}{2\pi r}}\,$ However, the current crossing surface S2 is entirely displacement current. Applying this law to surface S2, which is bounded by exactly the same curve $\partial S$ , but lies between the plates, produces:

$B={\frac {\mu _{0}I_{D}}{2\pi r}}\,$ Any surface S1 that intersects the wire has current I passing through it so Ampère's law gives the correct magnetic field. However a second surface S2 bounded by the same loop δS could be drawn passing between the capacitor plates, therefore having no current passing through it. Without the displacement current term Ampere's law would give zero magnetic field for this surface. Therefore without the displacement current term Ampere's law gives inconsistent results, the magnetic field would depend on the surface chosen for integration. Thus the displacement current term ε0 E / ∂t is necessary as a second source term which gives the correct magnetic field when the surface of integration passes between the capacitor plates. Because the current is increasing the charge on the capacitor's plates, the electric field between the plates is increasing, and the rate of change of electric field gives the correct value for the field B found above.

#### Mathematical formulation

In a more mathematical vein, the same results can be obtained from the underlying differential equations. Consider for simplicity a non-magnetic medium where the relative magnetic permeability is unity, and the complication of magnetization current (bound current) is absent, so that M=0 and J=Jf. The current leaving a volume must equal the rate of decrease of charge in a volume. In differential form this continuity equation becomes:

$\nabla \cdot {\boldsymbol {J_{f}}}=-{\frac {\partial \rho _{f}}{\partial t}}\ ,$ where the left side is the divergence of the free current density and the right side is the rate of decrease of the free charge density. However, Ampère's law in its original form states:

${\boldsymbol {\nabla \times B}}=\mu _{0}{\boldsymbol {J}}_{f}\ ,$ which implies that the divergence of the current term vanishes, contradicting the continuity equation. (Vanishing of the divergence is a result of the mathematical identity that states the divergence of a curl is always zero.) This conflict is removed by addition of the displacement current, as then:  

${\boldsymbol {\nabla \times B}}=\mu _{0}\left({\boldsymbol {J}}+\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {E}}}{\partial t}}\right)=\mu _{0}\left({\boldsymbol {J}}_{f}+{\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {D}}}{\partial t}}\right)\ ,$ and

${\boldsymbol {\nabla \cdot }}\left({\boldsymbol {\nabla \times B}}\right)=0=\mu _{0}\left(\nabla \cdot {\boldsymbol {J}}_{f}+{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}{\boldsymbol {\nabla \cdot D}}\right)\ ,$ which is in agreement with the continuity equation because of Gauss's law:

${\boldsymbol {\nabla \cdot D}}=\rho _{f}\ .$ ### Wave propagation

The added displacement current also leads to wave propagation by taking the curl of the equation for magnetic field. 

${\boldsymbol {J_{D}}}=\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {E}}}{\partial t}}$ Substituting this form for J into Ampère's law, and assuming there is no bound or free current density contributing to J :

${\boldsymbol {\nabla \times B}}=\mu _{0}{\boldsymbol {J_{D}}}\ ,$ with the result:

${\boldsymbol {\nabla \times }}\left({\boldsymbol {\nabla \times B}}\right)=\mu _{0}\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}{\boldsymbol {\nabla \times E}}\ .$ However,

${\boldsymbol {\nabla \times E}}=-{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}{\boldsymbol {B}}\ ,$ leading to the wave equation: 

$-{\boldsymbol {\nabla \times }}\left({\boldsymbol {\nabla \times B}}\right)=\nabla ^{2}{\boldsymbol {B}}=\mu _{0}\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}{\boldsymbol {B}}={\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}{\boldsymbol {B}}\ ,$ where use is made of the vector identity that holds for any vector field V(r, t):

${\boldsymbol {\nabla \times }}\left({\boldsymbol {\nabla \times V}}\right)={\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\left({\boldsymbol {\nabla \cdot V}}\right)-\nabla ^{2}{\boldsymbol {V}}\ ,$ and the fact that the divergence of the magnetic field is zero. An identical wave equation can be found for the electric field by taking the curl:

${\boldsymbol {\nabla \times }}\left({\boldsymbol {\nabla \times E}}\right)=-{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}{\boldsymbol {\nabla \times }}{\boldsymbol {B}}=-\mu _{0}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\left({\boldsymbol {J}}+\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}{\boldsymbol {E}}\right)\ .$ If J, P and ρ are zero, the result is:

$\nabla ^{2}{\boldsymbol {E}}=\mu _{0}\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}{\boldsymbol {E}}={\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}{\boldsymbol {E}}\ .$ The electric field can be expressed in the general form:

${\boldsymbol {E}}=-{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\varphi -{\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {A}}}{\partial t}}\ ,$ where φ is the electric potential (which can be chosen to satisfy Poisson's equation) and A is a vector potential (i.e. magnetic vector potential, not to be confused with Surface area, as A is denoted elsewhere). The φ component on the right hand side is the Gauss's law component, and this is the component that is relevant to the conservation of charge argument above. The second term on the right-hand side is the one relevant to the electromagnetic wave equation, because it is the term that contributes to the curl of E. Because of the vector identity that says the curl of a gradient is zero, φ does not contribute to ∇×E.

## History and interpretation

Maxwell's displacement current was postulated in part III of his 1861 paper 'On Physical Lines of Force'. Few topics in modern physics have caused as much confusion and misunderstanding as that of displacement current.  This is in part due to the fact that Maxwell used a sea of molecular vortices in his derivation, while modern textbooks operate on the basis that displacement current can exist in free space. Maxwell's derivation is unrelated to the modern day derivation for displacement current in the vacuum, which is based on consistency between Ampere's circuital law for the magnetic field and the continuity equation for electric charge.

Maxwell's purpose is stated by him at (Part I, p. 161):

I propose now to examine magnetic phenomena from a mechanical point of view, and to determine what tensions in, or motions of, a medium are capable of producing the mechanical phenomena observed.

He is careful to point out the treatment is one of analogy:

The author of this method of representation does not attempt to explain the origin of the observed forces by the effects due to these strains in the elastic solid, but makes use of the mathematical analogies of the two problems to assist the imagination in the study of both.

In part III, in relation to displacement current, he says

I conceived the rotating matter to be the substance of certain cells, divided from each other by cell-walls composed of particles which are very small compared with the cells, and that it is by the motions of these particles, and their tangential action on the substance in the cells, that the rotation is communicated from one cell to another.

Clearly Maxwell was driving at magnetization even though the same introduction clearly talks about dielectric polarization.

Maxwell concluded, using Newton's equation for the speed of sound (Lines of Force, Part III, equation (132)), that “light consists of transverse undulations in the same medium that is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena.”

But although the above quotations point towards a magnetic explanation for displacement current, for example, based upon the divergence of the above curl equation, Maxwell's explanation ultimately stressed linear polarization of dielectrics:

This displacement...is the commencement of a current...The amount of displacement depends on the nature of the body, and on the electromotive force so that if h is the displacement, R the electromotive force, and E a coefficient depending on the nature of the dielectric:

$R=-4\pi \mathrm {E} ^{2}h\ ;$ and if r is the value of the electric current due to displacement

$r={\frac {dh}{dt}}\ ,$ These relations are independent of any theory about the mechanism of dielectrics; but when we find electromotive force producing electric displacement in a dielectric, and when we find the dielectric recovering from its state of electric displacement...we cannot help regarding the phenomena as those of an elastic body, yielding to a pressure and recovering its form when the pressure is removed.—Part III – The theory of molecular vortices applied to statical electricity , pp. 14–15

With some change of symbols (and units) combined with the results deduced in the section "Current in capacitors" : r → J, R → −E and the material constant E−24π εrε0 these equations take the familiar form between a parallel plate capacitor with uniform electric field, and neglecting fringing effects around the edges of the plates:

$J={\frac {d}{dt}}{\frac {1}{4\pi \mathrm {E} ^{2}}}{\mathit {E}}={\frac {d}{dt}}\varepsilon _{r}\varepsilon _{0}{\mathit {E}}={\frac {d}{dt}}{\mathit {D}}\ .$ When it came to deriving the electromagnetic wave equation from displacement current in his 1865 paper A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field, he got around the problem of the non-zero divergence associated with Gauss's law and dielectric displacement by eliminating the Gauss term and deriving the wave equation exclusively for the solenoidal magnetic field vector.

Maxwell's emphasis on polarization diverted attention towards the electric capacitor circuit, and led to the common belief that Maxwell conceived of displacement current so as to maintain conservation of charge in an electric capacitor circuit. There are a variety of debatable notions about Maxwell's thinking, ranging from his supposed desire to perfect the symmetry of the field equations to the desire to achieve compatibility with the continuity equation.  

## Related Research Articles An electromagnetic field is a physical field produced by moving electrically charged objects. It affects the behavior of non-comoving charged objects at any distance of the field. The electromagnetic field extends indefinitely throughout space and describes the electromagnetic interaction. It is one of the four fundamental forces of nature. In physics the Lorentz force is the combination of electric and magnetic force on a point charge due to electromagnetic fields. A particle of charge q moving with a velocity v in an electric field E and a magnetic field B experiences a force of In classical electromagnetism, Ampère's circuital law relates the integrated magnetic field around a closed loop to the electric current passing through the loop. James Clerk Maxwell derived it using hydrodynamics in his 1861 paper "On Physical Lines of Force" and it is now one of the Maxwell equations, which form the basis of classical electromagnetism. In classical electromagnetism, polarization density is the vector field that expresses the density of permanent or induced electric dipole moments in a dielectric material. When a dielectric is placed in an external electric field, its molecules gain electric dipole moment and the dielectric is said to be polarized. The electric dipole moment induced per unit volume of the dielectric material is called the electric polarization of the dielectric.

"A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field" is a paper by James Clerk Maxwell on electromagnetism, published in 1865. In the paper, Maxwell derives an electromagnetic wave equation with a velocity for light in close agreement with measurements made by experiment, and deduces that light is an electromagnetic wave. Gaussian units constitute a metric system of physical units. This system is the most common of the several electromagnetic unit systems based on cgs (centimetre–gram–second) units. It is also called the Gaussian unit system, Gaussian-cgs units, or often just cgs units. The term "cgs units" is ambiguous and therefore to be avoided if possible: cgs contains within it several conflicting sets of electromagnetism units, not just Gaussian units, as described below.

The physical constant ε0, commonly called the vacuum permittivity, permittivity of free space or electric constant or the distributed capacitance of the vacuum, is an ideal, (baseline) physical constant, which is the value of the absolute dielectric permittivity of classical vacuum. It has the CODATA value

The electromagnetic wave equation is a second-order partial differential equation that describes the propagation of electromagnetic waves through a medium or in a vacuum. It is a three-dimensional form of the wave equation. The homogeneous form of the equation, written in terms of either the electric field E or the magnetic field B, takes the form: The Maxwell stress tensor is a symmetric second-order tensor used in classical electromagnetism to represent the interaction between electromagnetic forces and mechanical momentum. In simple situations, such as a point charge moving freely in a homogeneous magnetic field, it is easy to calculate the forces on the charge from the Lorentz force law. When the situation becomes more complicated, this ordinary procedure can become impossibly difficult, with equations spanning multiple lines. It is therefore convenient to collect many of these terms in the Maxwell stress tensor, and to use tensor arithmetic to find the answer to the problem at hand.

Lorentz–Heaviside units constitute a system of units within CGS, named from Hendrik Antoon Lorentz and Oliver Heaviside. They share with CGS-Gaussian units the property that the electric constant ε0 and magnetic constant µ0 do not appear, having been incorporated implicitly into the unit system and electromagnetic equations. Lorentz–Heaviside units may be regarded as normalizing ε0 = 1 and µ0 = 1, while at the same time revising Maxwell's equations to use the speed of light c instead. The covariant formulation of classical electromagnetism refers to ways of writing the laws of classical electromagnetism in a form that is manifestly invariant under Lorentz transformations, in the formalism of special relativity using rectilinear inertial coordinate systems. These expressions both make it simple to prove that the laws of classical electromagnetism take the same form in any inertial coordinate system, and also provide a way to translate the fields and forces from one frame to another. However, this is not as general as Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime or non-rectilinear coordinate systems. In electromagnetism and applications, an inhomogeneous electromagnetic wave equation, or nonhomogeneous electromagnetic wave equation, is one of a set of wave equations describing the propagation of electromagnetic waves generated by nonzero source charges and currents. The source terms in the wave equations makes the partial differential equations inhomogeneous, if the source terms are zero the equations reduce to the homogeneous electromagnetic wave equations. The equations follow from Maxwell's equations.

Dielectric loss quantifies a dielectric material's inherent dissipation of electromagnetic energy. It can be parameterized in terms of either the loss angleδ or the corresponding loss tangent tan δ. Both refer to the phasor in the complex plane whose real and imaginary parts are the resistive (lossy) component of an electromagnetic field and its reactive (lossless) counterpart. There are various mathematical descriptions of the electromagnetic field that are used in the study of electromagnetism, one of the four fundamental interactions of nature. In this article, several approaches are discussed, although the equations are in terms of electric and magnetic fields, potentials, and charges with currents, generally speaking.

In continuum mechanics, a compatible deformation tensor field in a body is that unique tensor field that is obtained when the body is subjected to a continuous, single-valued, displacement field. Compatibility is the study of the conditions under which such a displacement field can be guaranteed. Compatibility conditions are particular cases of integrability conditions and were first derived for linear elasticity by Barré de Saint-Venant in 1864 and proved rigorously by Beltrami in 1886. The electric dipole moment is a measure of the separation of positive and negative electrical charges within a system, that is, a measure of the system's overall polarity. The SI units for electric dipole moment are coulomb-meter (C⋅m); however, a commonly used unit in atomic physics and chemistry is the debye (D).

In optics, the Ewald–Oseen extinction theorem, sometimes referred to as just "extinction theorem", is a theorem that underlies the common understanding of scattering. It is named after Paul Peter Ewald and Carl Wilhelm Oseen, who proved the theorem in crystalline and isotropic media, respectively, in 1916 and 1915. Originally, the theorem applied to scattering by an isotropic dielectric objects in free space. The scope of the theorem was greatly extended to encompass a wide variety of bianisotropic media.

1. John D Jackson (1999). Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). Wiley. p. 238. ISBN   978-0-471-30932-1.
2. For example, see David J Griffiths (1999). (3rd ed.). Pearson/Addison Wesley. p. 323. ISBN   978-0-13-805326-0. and Tai L Chow (2006). Introduction to Electromagnetic Theory. Jones & Bartlett. p. 204. ISBN   978-0-7637-3827-3.
3. Stuart B. Palmer, Mircea S. Rogalski (1996). Advanced University Physics. Taylor & Francis. p. 214. ISBN   978-2-88449-065-8.
4. Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett (2006). Principles of Physics. Thomson Brooks/Cole. p. 807. ISBN   978-0-534-49143-7.
5. Feynman, Richard P.; Robert Leighton; Matthew Sands (1963). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. 2. Massachusetts, USA: Addison-Wesley. pp. 18–4. ISBN   978-0-201-02116-5.
6. Raymond Bonnett, Shane Cloude (1995). An Introduction to Electromagnetic Wave Propagation and Antennas. Taylor & Francis. p. 16. ISBN   978-1-85728-241-2.
7. JC Slater and NH Frank (1969). Electromagnetism (Reprint of 1947 ed.). Courier Dover Publications. p. 84. ISBN   978-0-486-62263-7.
8. JC Slater and NH Frank (1969). Electromagnetism (op. cit. ed.). p. 91. ISBN   978-0-486-62263-7.
9. J Billingham, A C King (2006). Wave Motion. Cambridge University Press. p. 182. ISBN   978-0-521-63450-2.
10. Daniel M. Siegel (2003). Innovation in Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory. Cambridge University Press. p. 85. ISBN   978-0-521-53329-4.
11. Paul J. Nahin (2002). Oliver Heaviside: The Life, Work, and Times of an Electrical Genius of the Victorian Age. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 109. ISBN   978-0-8018-6909-9.
12. Vyacheslav Stepin (2002). Theoretical Knowledge. Springer. p. 202. ISBN   978-1-4020-3045-1.