# Displacement current

Last updated

In electromagnetism, displacement current density is the quantity D/t appearing in Maxwell's equations that is defined in terms of the rate of change of D, the electric displacement field. Displacement current density has the same units as electric current density, and it is a source of the magnetic field just as actual current is. However it is not an electric current of moving charges, but a time-varying electric field. In physical materials (as opposed to vacuum), there is also a contribution from the slight motion of charges bound in atoms, called dielectric polarization.

## Contents

The idea was conceived by James Clerk Maxwell in his 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force, Part III in connection with the displacement of electric particles in a dielectric medium. Maxwell added displacement current to the electric current term in Ampère's Circuital Law. In his 1865 paper A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field Maxwell used this amended version of Ampère's Circuital Law to derive the electromagnetic wave equation. This derivation is now generally accepted as a historical landmark in physics by virtue of uniting electricity, magnetism and optics into one single unified theory. The displacement current term is now seen as a crucial addition that completed Maxwell's equations and is necessary to explain many phenomena, most particularly the existence of electromagnetic waves.

## Explanation

The electric displacement field is defined as:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {D} =\varepsilon _{0}\mathbf {E} +\mathbf {P} \ ,}$

where:

Differentiating this equation with respect to time defines the displacement current density, which therefore has two components in a dielectric: [1] (see also the "displacement current" section of the article "current density")

${\displaystyle \mathbf {J} _{\mathrm {D} }=\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}+{\frac {\partial \mathbf {P} }{\partial t}}\,.}$

The first term on the right hand side is present in material media and in free space. It doesn't necessarily come from any actual movement of charge, but it does have an associated magnetic field, just as a current does due to charge motion. Some authors apply the name displacement current to the first term by itself. [2]

The second term on the right hand side, called polarization current density, comes from the change in polarization of the individual molecules of the dielectric material. Polarization results when, under the influence of an applied electric field, the charges in molecules have moved from a position of exact cancellation. The positive and negative charges in molecules separate, causing an increase in the state of polarization P. A changing state of polarization corresponds to charge movement and so is equivalent to a current, hence the term "polarization current". Thus,

${\displaystyle \mathbf {I} _{\mathrm {D} }=\iint _{S}\mathbf {J} _{\mathrm {D} }\cdot \operatorname {d} \!\mathbf {S} =\iint _{S}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {D} }{\partial t}}\cdot \operatorname {d} \!\mathbf {S} ={\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\iint _{S}\mathbf {D} \cdot \operatorname {d} \!\mathbf {S} ={\frac {\partial \Phi _{\mathrm {D} }}{\partial t}}\,.}$

This polarization is the displacement current as it was originally conceived by Maxwell. Maxwell made no special treatment of the vacuum, treating it as a material medium. For Maxwell, the effect of P was simply to change the relative permittivity εr in the relation D = ε0εrE.

The modern justification of displacement current is explained below.

### Isotropic dielectric case

In the case of a very simple dielectric material the constitutive relation holds:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {D} =\varepsilon \,\mathbf {E} ~,}$

where the permittivity ${\displaystyle \varepsilon =\varepsilon _{0}\,\varepsilon _{\mathrm {r} }}$ is the product of:

In the equation above, the use of ε accounts for the polarization (if any) of the dielectric material.

The scalar value of displacement current may also be expressed in terms of electric flux:

${\displaystyle I_{\mathrm {D} }=\varepsilon \,{\frac {\,\partial \Phi _{\mathrm {E} }\,}{\partial t}}~.}$

The forms in terms of scalar ε are correct only for linear isotropic materials. For linear non-isotropic materials, ε becomes a matrix; even more generally, ε may be replaced by a tensor, which may depend upon the electric field itself, or may exhibit frequency dependence (hence dispersion).

For a linear isotropic dielectric, the polarization P is given by:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {P} =\varepsilon _{0}\chi _{\mathrm {e} }\,\mathbf {E} =\varepsilon _{0}(\varepsilon _{\mathrm {r} }-1)\,\mathbf {E} ~,}$

where χe is known as the susceptibility of the dielectric to electric fields. Note that

${\displaystyle \varepsilon =\varepsilon _{\mathrm {r} }\,\varepsilon _{0}=\left(1+\chi _{\mathrm {e} }\right)\,\varepsilon _{0}~.}$

## Necessity

Some implications of the displacement current follow, which agree with experimental observation, and with the requirements of logical consistency for the theory of electromagnetism.

### Generalizing Ampère's circuital law

#### Current in capacitors

An example illustrating the need for the displacement current arises in connection with capacitors with no medium between the plates. Consider the charging capacitor in the figure. The capacitor is in a circuit that causes equal and opposite charges to appear on the left plate and the right plate, charging the capacitor and increasing the electric field between its plates. No actual charge is transported through the vacuum between its plates. Nonetheless, a magnetic field exists between the plates as though a current were present there as well. One explanation is that a displacement currentID "flows" in the vacuum, and this current produces the magnetic field in the region between the plates according to Ampère's law: [3] [4]

${\displaystyle \oint _{C}\mathbf {B} \cdot \operatorname {d} \!{\boldsymbol {\ell }}=\mu _{0}I_{\mathrm {D} }~,}$

where

• ${\displaystyle \oint _{C}}$ is the closed line integral around some closed curve C;
• ${\displaystyle \mathbf {B} }$ is the magnetic field measured in teslas;
• ${\displaystyle \operatorname {\cdot } ~}$ is the vector dot product;
• ${\displaystyle \mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}}$ is an infinitesimal line element along the curve C, that is, a vector with magnitude equal to the length element of C, and direction given by the tangent to the curve C;
• ${\displaystyle \mu _{0}\,}$ is the magnetic constant, also called the permeability of free space; and
• ${\displaystyle I_{\mathrm {D} }\,}$ is the net displacement current that passes through a small surface bounded by the curve C.

The magnetic field between the plates is the same as that outside the plates, so the displacement current must be the same as the conduction current in the wires, that is,

${\displaystyle I_{\mathrm {D} }=I\,,}$

which extends the notion of current beyond a mere transport of charge.

Next, this displacement current is related to the charging of the capacitor. Consider the current in the imaginary cylindrical surface shown surrounding the left plate. A current, say I, passes outward through the left surface L of the cylinder, but no conduction current (no transport of real charges) crosses the right surface R. Notice that the electric field E between the plates increases as the capacitor charges. That is, in a manner described by Gauss's law, assuming no dielectric between the plates:

${\displaystyle Q(t)=\varepsilon _{0}\oint _{S}\mathbf {E} (t)\cdot \operatorname {d} \!\mathbf {S} \,,}$

where S refers to the imaginary cylindrical surface. Assuming a parallel plate capacitor with uniform electric field, and neglecting fringing effects around the edges of the plates, according to charge conservation equation

${\displaystyle I=-{\frac {\mathrm {d} Q}{\mathrm {d} t}}=-\varepsilon _{0}\oint _{S}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}\cdot \operatorname {d} \!\mathbf {S} =S\,\varepsilon _{0}{\Biggl .}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}{\Biggr |}_{R}~,}$

where the first term has a negative sign because charge leaves surface L (the charge is decreasing), the last term has a positive sign because unit vector of surface R is from left to right while the direction of electric field is from right to left, S is the area of the surface R. The electric field at surface L is zero because surface L is in the outside of the capacitor. Under the assumption of a uniform electric field distribution inside the capacitor, the displacement current density JD is found by dividing by the area of the surface:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {J} _{\mathrm {D} }={\frac {\mathbf {I} _{\mathrm {D} }}{S}}={\frac {\mathbf {I} }{S}}=\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}={\frac {\partial \mathbf {D} }{\partial t}}~,}$

where I is the current leaving the cylindrical surface (which must equal ID) and JD is the flow of charge per unit area into the cylindrical surface through the face R.

Combining these results, the magnetic field is found using the integral form of Ampère's law with an arbitrary choice of contour provided the displacement current density term is added to the conduction current density (the Ampère-Maxwell equation): [5]

${\displaystyle \oint _{\partial S}\mathbf {B} \cdot \operatorname {d} \!{\boldsymbol {\ell }}=\mu _{0}\int _{S}\left(\mathbf {J} +\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}\right)\cdot \operatorname {d} \!\mathbf {S} \,.}$

This equation says that the integral of the magnetic field B around the edge ${\displaystyle \partial S}$ of a surface S is equal to the integrated current J through any surface with the same edge, plus the displacement current term ${\displaystyle \varepsilon _{0}\partial \mathbf {E} /\partial t}$ through whichever surface.

As depicted in the figure to the right, the current crossing surface S1 is entirely conduction current. Applying the Ampère-Maxwell equation to surface S1 yields:

${\displaystyle B={\frac {\mu _{0}I}{2\pi r}}~.}$

However, the current crossing surface S2 is entirely displacement current. Applying this law to surface S2, which is bounded by exactly the same curve ${\displaystyle \partial S}$, but lies between the plates, produces:

${\displaystyle B={\frac {\mu _{0}I_{\mathrm {D} }}{2\pi r}}~.}$

Any surface S1 that intersects the wire has current I passing through it so Ampère's law gives the correct magnetic field. However a second surface S2 bounded by the same edge ${\displaystyle \partial S}$ could be drawn passing between the capacitor plates, therefore having no current passing through it. Without the displacement current term Ampere's law would give zero magnetic field for this surface. Therefore, without the displacement current term Ampere's law gives inconsistent results, the magnetic field would depend on the surface chosen for integration. Thus the displacement current term ${\displaystyle \varepsilon _{0}\partial \mathbf {E} /\partial t}$ is necessary as a second source term which gives the correct magnetic field when the surface of integration passes between the capacitor plates. Because the current is increasing the charge on the capacitor's plates, the electric field between the plates is increasing, and the rate of change of electric field gives the correct value for the field B found above.

#### Mathematical formulation

In a more mathematical vein, the same results can be obtained from the underlying differential equations. Consider for simplicity a non-magnetic medium where the relative magnetic permeability is unity, and the complication of magnetization current (bound current) is absent, so that ${\displaystyle \mathbf {M} =0}$ and ${\displaystyle \mathbf {J} =\mathbf {J} _{\mathrm {f} }}$. The current leaving a volume must equal the rate of decrease of charge in a volume. In differential form this continuity equation becomes:

${\displaystyle \nabla \cdot \mathbf {J} _{\mathrm {f} }=-{\frac {\partial \rho _{\mathrm {f} }}{\partial t}}\,,}$

where the left side is the divergence of the free current density and the right side is the rate of decrease of the free charge density. However, Ampère's law in its original form states:

${\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf {B} =\mu _{0}\mathbf {J} _{\mathrm {f} }\,,}$

which implies that the divergence of the current term vanishes, contradicting the continuity equation. (Vanishing of the divergence is a result of the mathematical identity that states the divergence of a curl is always zero.) This conflict is removed by addition of the displacement current, as then: [6] [7]

${\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf {B} =\mu _{0}\left(\mathbf {J} +\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}\right)=\mu _{0}\left(\mathbf {J} _{\mathrm {f} }+{\frac {\partial \mathbf {D} }{\partial t}}\right)\,,}$

and

${\displaystyle \nabla \cdot \left(\nabla \times \mathbf {B} \right)=0=\mu _{0}\left(\nabla \cdot \mathbf {J} _{\mathrm {f} }+{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\nabla \cdot \mathbf {D} \right)\,,}$

which is in agreement with the continuity equation because of Gauss's law:

${\displaystyle \nabla \cdot \mathbf {D} =\rho _{\mathrm {f} }\,.}$

### Wave propagation

The added displacement current also leads to wave propagation by taking the curl of the equation for magnetic field. [8]

${\displaystyle \mathbf {J} _{\mathrm {D} }=\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}\,.}$

Substituting this form for J into Ampère's law, and assuming there is no bound or free current density contributing to J:

${\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf {B} =\mu _{0}\mathbf {J} _{\mathrm {D} }\,,}$

with the result:

${\displaystyle \nabla \times \left(\nabla \times \mathbf {B} \right)=\mu _{0}\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\nabla \times \mathbf {E} \,.}$

However,

${\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf {E} =-{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\mathbf {B} \,,}$

leading to the wave equation: [9]

${\displaystyle -\nabla \times \left(\nabla \times \mathbf {B} \right)=\nabla ^{2}\mathbf {B} =\mu _{0}\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}\mathbf {B} ={\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}\mathbf {B} \,,}$

where use is made of the vector identity that holds for any vector field V(r, t):

${\displaystyle \nabla \times \left(\nabla \times \mathbf {V} \right)=\nabla \left(\nabla \cdot \mathbf {V} \right)-\nabla ^{2}\mathbf {V} \,,}$

and the fact that the divergence of the magnetic field is zero. An identical wave equation can be found for the electric field by taking the curl:

${\displaystyle \nabla \times \left(\nabla \times \mathbf {E} \right)=-{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\nabla \times \mathbf {B} =-\mu _{0}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\left(\mathbf {J} +\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\mathbf {E} \right)\,.}$

If J, P, and ρ are zero, the result is:

${\displaystyle \nabla ^{2}\mathbf {E} =\mu _{0}\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}\mathbf {E} ={\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}\mathbf {E} \,.}$

The electric field can be expressed in the general form:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} =-\nabla \varphi -{\frac {\partial \mathbf {A} }{\partial t}}\,,}$

where φ is the electric potential (which can be chosen to satisfy Poisson's equation) and A is a vector potential (i.e. magnetic vector potential, not to be confused with surface area, as A is denoted elsewhere). The φ component on the right hand side is the Gauss's law component, and this is the component that is relevant to the conservation of charge argument above. The second term on the right-hand side is the one relevant to the electromagnetic wave equation, because it is the term that contributes to the curl of E. Because of the vector identity that says the curl of a gradient is zero, φ does not contribute to ∇×E.

## History and interpretation

Maxwell's displacement current was postulated in part III of his 1861 paper 'On Physical Lines of Force'. Few topics in modern physics have caused as much confusion and misunderstanding as that of displacement current. [10] This is in part due to the fact that Maxwell used a sea of molecular vortices in his derivation, while modern textbooks operate on the basis that displacement current can exist in free space. Maxwell's derivation is unrelated to the modern day derivation for displacement current in the vacuum, which is based on consistency between Ampere's circuital law for the magnetic field and the continuity equation for electric charge.

Maxwell's purpose is stated by him at (Part I, p. 161):

I propose now to examine magnetic phenomena from a mechanical point of view, and to determine what tensions in, or motions of, a medium are capable of producing the mechanical phenomena observed.

He is careful to point out the treatment is one of analogy:

The author of this method of representation does not attempt to explain the origin of the observed forces by the effects due to these strains in the elastic solid, but makes use of the mathematical analogies of the two problems to assist the imagination in the study of both.

In part III, in relation to displacement current, he says

I conceived the rotating matter to be the substance of certain cells, divided from each other by cell-walls composed of particles which are very small compared with the cells, and that it is by the motions of these particles, and their tangential action on the substance in the cells, that the rotation is communicated from one cell to another.

Clearly Maxwell was driving at magnetization even though the same introduction clearly talks about dielectric polarization.

Maxwell concluded, using Newton's equation for the speed of sound (Lines of Force, Part III, equation (132)), that "light consists of transverse undulations in the same medium that is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena."

But although the above quotations point towards a magnetic explanation for displacement current, for example, based upon the divergence of the above curl equation, Maxwell's explanation ultimately stressed linear polarization of dielectrics:

This displacement ... is the commencement of a current ... The amount of displacement depends on the nature of the body, and on the electromotive force so that if h is the displacement, R the electromotive force, and E a coefficient depending on the nature of the dielectric:

${\displaystyle R=-4\pi \mathrm {E} ^{2}h\,;}$

and if r is the value of the electric current due to displacement

${\displaystyle r={\frac {dh}{dt}}\,,}$

These relations are independent of any theory about the mechanism of dielectrics; but when we find electromotive force producing electric displacement in a dielectric, and when we find the dielectric recovering from its state of electric displacement ... we cannot help regarding the phenomena as those of an elastic body, yielding to a pressure and recovering its form when the pressure is removed.

On Physical Lines of Force, Part III, The theory of molecular vortices applied to statical electricity, pp. 14–15

With some change of symbols (and units) combined with the results deduced in the section § Current in capacitors (rJ, R → −E, and the material constant E−2 → 4πεrε0 these equations take the familiar form between a parallel plate capacitor with uniform electric field, and neglecting fringing effects around the edges of the plates:

${\displaystyle J={\frac {d}{dt}}{\frac {1}{4\pi \mathrm {E} ^{2}}}E={\frac {d}{dt}}\varepsilon _{r}\varepsilon _{0}E={\frac {d}{dt}}D\,.}$

When it came to deriving the electromagnetic wave equation from displacement current in his 1865 paper A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field, he got around the problem of the non-zero divergence associated with Gauss's law and dielectric displacement by eliminating the Gauss term and deriving the wave equation exclusively for the solenoidal magnetic field vector.

Maxwell's emphasis on polarization diverted attention towards the electric capacitor circuit, and led to the common belief that Maxwell conceived of displacement current so as to maintain conservation of charge in an electric capacitor circuit. There are a variety of debatable notions about Maxwell's thinking, ranging from his supposed desire to perfect the symmetry of the field equations to the desire to achieve compatibility with the continuity equation. [11] [12]

## Related Research Articles

An electromagnetic field is a classical field produced by accelerating electric charges. It is the field described by classical electrodynamics and is the classical counterpart to the quantized electromagnetic field tensor in quantum electrodynamics. The electromagnetic field propagates at the speed of light and interacts with charges and currents. Its quantum counterpart is one of the four fundamental forces of nature

In physics the Lorentz force is the combination of electric and magnetic force on a point charge due to electromagnetic fields. A particle of charge q moving with a velocity v in an electric field E and a magnetic field B experiences a force of

Maxwell's equations, or Maxwell–Heaviside equations, are a set of coupled partial differential equations that, together with the Lorentz force law, form the foundation of classical electromagnetism, classical optics, and electric circuits. The equations provide a mathematical model for electric, optical, and radio technologies, such as power generation, electric motors, wireless communication, lenses, radar etc. They describe how electric and magnetic fields are generated by charges, currents, and changes of the fields. The equations are named after the physicist and mathematician James Clerk Maxwell, who, in 1861 and 1862, published an early form of the equations that included the Lorentz force law. Maxwell first used the equations to propose that light is an electromagnetic phenomenon. The modern form of the equations in their most common formulation is credited to Oliver Heaviside.

An electric field is the physical field that surrounds electrically charged particles and exerts force on all other charged particles in the field, either attracting or repelling them. It also refers to the physical field for a system of charged particles. Electric fields originate from electric charges and time-varying electric currents. Electric fields and magnetic fields are both manifestations of the electromagnetic field, one of the four fundamental interactions of nature.

In physics, the Poynting vector represents the directional energy flux or power flow of an electromagnetic field. The SI unit of the Poynting vector is the watt per square metre (W/m2); kg/s3 in base SI units. It is named after its discoverer John Henry Poynting who first derived it in 1884. Nikolay Umov is also credited with formulating the concept. Oliver Heaviside also discovered it independently in the more general form that recognises the freedom of adding the curl of an arbitrary vector field to the definition. The Poynting vector is used throughout electromagnetics in conjunction with Poynting's theorem, the continuity equation expressing conservation of electromagnetic energy, to calculate the power flow in electromagnetic fields.

In electromagnetism, the absolute permittivity, often simply called permittivity and denoted by the Greek letter ε (epsilon), is a measure of the electric polarizability of a dielectric. A material with high permittivity polarizes more in response to an applied electric field than a material with low permittivity, thereby storing more energy in the material. In electrostatics, the permittivity plays an important role in determining the capacitance of a capacitor.

In physics and electromagnetism, Gauss's law, also known as Gauss's flux theorem, is a law relating the distribution of electric charge to the resulting electric field. In its integral form, it states that the flux of the electric field out of an arbitrary closed surface is proportional to the electric charge enclosed by the surface, irrespective of how that charge is distributed. Even though the law alone is insufficient to determine the electric field across a surface enclosing any charge distribution, this may be possible in cases where symmetry mandates uniformity of the field. Where no such symmetry exists, Gauss's law can be used in its differential form, which states that the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the local density of charge.

Poisson's equation is an elliptic partial differential equation of broad utility in theoretical physics. For example, the solution to Poisson's equation is the potential field caused by a given electric charge or mass density distribution; with the potential field known, one can then calculate electrostatic or gravitational (force) field. It is a generalization of Laplace's equation, which is also frequently seen in physics. The equation is named after French mathematician and physicist Siméon Denis Poisson.

In classical electromagnetism, Ampère's circuital law relates the integrated magnetic field around a closed loop to the electric current passing through the loop. James Clerk Maxwell derived it using hydrodynamics in his 1861 published paper "On Physical Lines of Force" In 1865 he generalized the equation to apply to time-varying currents by adding the displacement current term, resulting in the modern form of the law, sometimes called the Ampère–Maxwell law, which is one of Maxwell's equations which form the basis of classical electromagnetism.

In classical electromagnetism, polarization density is the vector field that expresses the density of permanent or induced electric dipole moments in a dielectric material. When a dielectric is placed in an external electric field, its molecules gain electric dipole moment and the dielectric is said to be polarized. The electric dipole moment induced per unit volume of the dielectric material is called the electric polarization of the dielectric.

"A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field" is a paper by James Clerk Maxwell on electromagnetism, published in 1865. In the paper, Maxwell derives an electromagnetic wave equation with a velocity for light in close agreement with measurements made by experiment, and deduces that light is an electromagnetic wave.

In physics, the electric displacement field or electric induction is a vector field that appears in Maxwell's equations. It accounts for the effects of free and bound charge within materials. "D" stands for "displacement", as in the related concept of displacement current in dielectrics. In free space, the electric displacement field is equivalent to flux density, a concept that lends understanding of Gauss's law. In the International System of Units (SI), it is expressed in units of coulomb per meter square (C⋅m−2).

In classical electromagnetism, magnetization is the vector field that expresses the density of permanent or induced magnetic dipole moments in a magnetic material. Movement within this field is described by direction and is either Axial or Diametric. The origin of the magnetic moments responsible for magnetization can be either microscopic electric currents resulting from the motion of electrons in atoms, or the spin of the electrons or the nuclei. Net magnetization results from the response of a material to an external magnetic field. Paramagnetic materials have a weak induced magnetization in a magnetic field, which disappears when the magnetic field is removed. Ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic materials have strong magnetization in a magnetic field, and can be magnetized to have magnetization in the absence of an external field, becoming a permanent magnet. Magnetization is not necessarily uniform within a material, but may vary between different points. Magnetization also describes how a material responds to an applied magnetic field as well as the way the material changes the magnetic field, and can be used to calculate the forces that result from those interactions. It can be compared to electric polarization, which is the measure of the corresponding response of a material to an electric field in electrostatics. Physicists and engineers usually define magnetization as the quantity of magnetic moment per unit volume. It is represented by a pseudovector M.

The electromagnetic wave equation is a second-order partial differential equation that describes the propagation of electromagnetic waves through a medium or in a vacuum. It is a three-dimensional form of the wave equation. The homogeneous form of the equation, written in terms of either the electric field E or the magnetic field B, takes the form:

The Maxwell stress tensor is a symmetric second-order tensor used in classical electromagnetism to represent the interaction between electromagnetic forces and mechanical momentum. In simple situations, such as a point charge moving freely in a homogeneous magnetic field, it is easy to calculate the forces on the charge from the Lorentz force law. When the situation becomes more complicated, this ordinary procedure can become impractically difficult, with equations spanning multiple lines. It is therefore convenient to collect many of these terms in the Maxwell stress tensor, and to use tensor arithmetic to find the answer to the problem at hand.

The covariant formulation of classical electromagnetism refers to ways of writing the laws of classical electromagnetism in a form that is manifestly invariant under Lorentz transformations, in the formalism of special relativity using rectilinear inertial coordinate systems. These expressions both make it simple to prove that the laws of classical electromagnetism take the same form in any inertial coordinate system, and also provide a way to translate the fields and forces from one frame to another. However, this is not as general as Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime or non-rectilinear coordinate systems.

In electromagnetism and applications, an inhomogeneous electromagnetic wave equation, or nonhomogeneous electromagnetic wave equation, is one of a set of wave equations describing the propagation of electromagnetic waves generated by nonzero source charges and currents. The source terms in the wave equations make the partial differential equations inhomogeneous, if the source terms are zero the equations reduce to the homogeneous electromagnetic wave equations. The equations follow from Maxwell's equations.

Dielectric loss quantifies a dielectric material's inherent dissipation of electromagnetic energy. It can be parameterized in terms of either the loss angleδ or the corresponding loss tangent tan δ. Both refer to the phasor in the complex plane whose real and imaginary parts are the resistive (lossy) component of an electromagnetic field and its reactive (lossless) counterpart.

There are various mathematical descriptions of the electromagnetic field that are used in the study of electromagnetism, one of the four fundamental interactions of nature. In this article, several approaches are discussed, although the equations are in terms of electric and magnetic fields, potentials, and charges with currents, generally speaking.

Magnetic current is, nominally, a current composed of fictitious moving magnetic monopoles. It has the dimensions of volts. The usual symbol for magnetic current is which is analogous to for electric current. Magnetic currents produce an electric field analogously to the production of a magnetic field by electric currents. Magnetic current density, which has the units of V/m2, is usually represented by the symbols and . The superscripts indicate total and impressed magnetic current density. The impressed currents are the energy sources. In many useful cases, a distribution of electric charge can be mathematically replaced by an equivalent distribution of magnetic current. This artifice can be used to simplify some electromagnetic field problems. It is possible to use both electric current densities and magnetic current densities in the same analysis.

## References

1. John D Jackson (1999). (3rd ed.). Wiley. p.  238. ISBN   978-0-471-30932-1.
2. For example, see David J Griffiths (1999). (3rd ed.). Pearson/Addison Wesley. p.  323. ISBN   978-0-13-805326-0. and Tai L Chow (2006). Introduction to Electromagnetic Theory. Jones & Bartlett. p. 204. ISBN   978-0-7637-3827-3.
3. Palmer, Stuart B. & Rogalski, Mircea S. (1996). Advanced University Physics. Taylor & Francis. p. 214. ISBN   978-2-88449-065-8 via Google Books.
4. Serway, Raymond A. & Jewett, John W. (2006). Principles of Physics. Thomson Brooks/Cole. p. 807. ISBN   978-0-534-49143-7 via Google Books.
5. Feynman, Richard P.; Leighton, Robert & Sands, Matthew (1963). . Vol. 2. Massachusetts, USA: Addison-Wesley. p. 18‑4. ISBN   978-0-201-02116-5 via archive.org.
6. Bonnett, Raymond & Cloude, Shane (1995). An Introduction to Electromagnetic Wave Propagation and Antennas. Taylor & Francis. p. 16. ISBN   978-1-85728-241-2 via Google Books.
7. Slater, J.C. & Frank, N.H. (1969) [1947]. Electromagnetism (reprint ed.). Courier Dover Publications. p. 84. ISBN   978-0-486-62263-7 via Google Books.
8. JC Slater and NH Frank (1969). Electromagnetism (op. cit. ed.). p. 91. ISBN   978-0-486-62263-7.
9. J Billingham, A C King (2006). Wave Motion. Cambridge University Press. p. 182. ISBN   978-0-521-63450-2.
10. Daniel M. Siegel (2003). Innovation in Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory. Cambridge University Press. p. 85. ISBN   978-0-521-53329-4.
11. Paul J. Nahin (2002). Oliver Heaviside: The Life, Work, and Times of an Electrical Genius of the Victorian Age. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 109. ISBN   978-0-8018-6909-9.
12. Vyacheslav Stepin (2002). Theoretical Knowledge. Springer. p. 202. ISBN   978-1-4020-3045-1.

## Maxwell's papers

• AM Bork Maxwell, Displacement Current, and Symmetry (1963)
• AM Bork Maxwell and the Electromagnetic Wave Equation (1967)