Emancipation reform of 1861

Last updated
A 1907 painting by Boris Kustodiev depicting Russian serfs listening to the proclamation of the Emancipation Manifesto in 1861 Reading of the Manifest (Liberation of peasants) - Kustodiev, 1907.jpg
A 1907 painting by Boris Kustodiev depicting Russian serfs listening to the proclamation of the Emancipation Manifesto in 1861

The Emancipation Reform of 1861 in Russia, also known as the Emancipation Edict of Russia, (Russian : Крестьянская реформа 1861 года, romanized: Krestyanskaya reforma 1861 goda – "peasants' reform of 1861") was the first and most important of the liberal reforms passed during the reign (1855–1881) of Emperor Alexander II of Russia. The reform effectively abolished serfdom throughout the Russian Empire.


The 1861 Emancipation Manifesto proclaimed the emancipation of the serfs on private estates and of the domestic (household) serfs. By this edict more than 23 million people received their liberty. [1] Serfs gained the full rights of free citizens, including rights to marry without having to gain consent, to own property and to own a business. The Manifesto prescribed that peasants would be able to buy the land from the landlords. Household serfs were the least affected: they gained only their freedom and no land.

The serfs were emancipated in 1861, following a speech given by Tsar Alexander II on 30 March 1856. [2] In Georgia, the emancipation took place later, in 1864, and on much better terms for the nobles than in Russia.[ citation needed ] State-owned serfs (those living on and working Imperial lands) were emancipated in 1866. [1]


Prior to 1861 Russia had two main categories of peasants:[ citation needed ]

Only those who were owned privately were considered serfs. They comprised an estimated 38% of the population. [3] As well as having obligations to the state, they also were obliged to the landowner, who had great power over their lives.

The rural population lived in households (dvory, singular dvor), gathered as villages (derevni; a derevnya with a church became a selo), run by a mir ('commune', or obshchina )—isolated, conservative, largely self-sufficient and self-governing units scattered across the land every 10 km (6.2 mi) or so. Imperial Russia had around 20 million dvory, forty percent of them containing six to ten people.[ citation needed ]

Intensely insular, the mir assembly, the skhod (sel'skii skhod), appointed an elder ( starosta ) and a 'clerk' (pisar) to deal with any external issues. Peasants within a mir shared land and resources. The fields were divided among the families as nadel ("allotment")—a complex of strip plots, distributed according to the quality of the soil. The strips were periodically redistributed within the villages to produce level economic conditions. The land however, was not owned by the mir; the land was the legal property of the 100,000 or so landowners ( pomeshchiks , an equivalent of "landed gentry") and the inhabitants, as serfs, were not allowed to leave the property where they were born. The peasants were duty-bound to make regular payments in labor and goods. It has been estimated[ by whom? ] that landowners took at least one third of income and production by the first half of the nineteenth century. [4]

Earlier reform moves

The need for urgent reform was well understood in 19th-century Russia. Much support for it emanated from universities, authors and other intellectual circles. Various projects of emancipation reforms were prepared by Mikhail Speransky, Nikolay Mordvinov, and Pavel Kiselyov. However, conservative or reactionary nobility thwarted their efforts. In Western guberniyas serfdom was abolished early in the century. In Congress Poland, serfdom had been abolished before it became Russian (by Napoleon in 1807). Serfdom was abolished in governorates of Estonia in 1816, in Courland in 1817, and in Livonia in 1819. [5]

In 1797, Paul I of Russia decreed that corvee labor was limited to 3 days a week, and never on Sunday, but this law was not enforced. Beginning in 1801, Alexander I of Russia appointed a committee to study possible emancipation, but its only effect was to prohibit the sale of serfs without their families. Beginning in 1825, Nicholas I of Russia expressed his desire for emancipation on many occasions, and even improved the lives of serfs on state properties, but did not change the condition of serfs on private estates. [6]

Shaping of the manifesto

My intention is to abolish serfdom ... you can yourself understand that the present order of owning souls cannot remain unchanged. It is better to abolish serfdom from above, than to wait for that time when it starts to abolish itself from below. I ask you to think about the best way to carry this out

Alexander II's speech to the Marshalls of the Nobility, 30 March 1856. [2]

The liberal politicians who stood behind the 1861 manifesto—Nikolay Milyutin, Alexei Strol'man and Yakov Rostovtsev—also recognized that their country was one of a few remaining feudal states in Europe. The pitiful display by Russian forces in the Crimean War left the government acutely aware of the empire's weaknesses. Eager to grow and develop industrial and therefore military and political strength, they introduced a number of economic reforms. It was optimistically hoped that after the abolition the mir would dissolve into individual peasant land owners and the beginnings of a market economy.[ citation needed ]

Alexander II, unlike his father, was willing to deal with this problem. Moving on from a petition from the Lithuanian provinces, a committee "for ameliorating the condition of the peasants" was founded and the principles of the abolition considered.[ citation needed ]

The main point at issue was whether the serfs should remain dependent on the landlords, or whether they should be transformed into a class of independent communal proprietors.[ citation needed ]

The land-owners initially pushed for granting the peasants freedom but not any land. The tsar and his advisers, mindful of 1848 events in Western Europe, were opposed to creating a proletariat and the instability this could bring. But giving the peasants freedom and land seemed to leave the existing land-owners without the large and cheap labour-force they needed to maintain their estates and lifestyles. By 1859 however, a third of their estates and two-thirds of their serfs were mortgaged to the state or noble banks. This was why they had to accept the emancipation. [7]

To 'balance' this, the legislation contained three measures to reduce the potential economic self-sufficiency of the peasants. Firstly a transition period of two years was introduced, during which the peasant was obligated as before to the old land-owner. Secondly large parts of common land were passed to the major land-owners as otrezki ("cut off lands"), making many forests, roads and rivers accessible only for a fee. The third measure was that the serfs must pay the land-owner for their allocation of land in a series of redemption payments, which in turn, were used to compensate the landowners with bonds. The government would advance 75% of the total sum to the land-owner, and then the peasants would repay the government, plus interest, over forty-nine years. The government finally cancelled these redemption payments in 1907.[ citation needed ]

Emancipation Manifesto

Peasants Reading the Emancipation Manifesto, an 1873 painting by Grigory Myasoyedov Grigoriy Myasoyedov Reading of the 1861 Manifesto 1873.jpg
Peasants Reading the Emancipation Manifesto, an 1873 painting by Grigory Myasoyedov

The legal basis of the reform was the Tsar's Emancipation Manifesto of 3 March [ O.S. 19 February] 1861, [8] [9] [10] accompanied by the set of legislative acts under the general name Regulations Concerning Peasants Leaving Serf Dependence (Russian : Положения о крестьянах, выходящих из крепостной зависимостиPolozheniya o krestyanakh, vykhodyashchikh iz krepostnoi zavisimosti).[ citation needed ]

This Manifesto proclaimed the emancipation of the serfs on private estates and of the domestic (household) serfs. [1] Serfs were granted the full rights of free citizens, gaining the rights to marry without having to gain consent, to own property and to own a business. The Manifesto also permitted peasants to buy the land from the landlords.[ citation needed ]


Mir communities had the power to distribute the land given to newly freed serfs by the Russian government amongst individuals within the community. Due to the community's ownership of the land, as opposed to the individual's, an individual peasant could not sell his portion of the land to go work in a factory in the city. A peasant was required to pay off long term loans received by the government. The money from these loans was given to the primary landowner. The land allotted to the recently freed serfs did not include the best land in the country, which remained in the hands of the nobility.[ citation needed ]

The implementation of land settlement varied over the vast and diverse territory of the Russian Empire, but typically a peasant had rights to buy out about half of the land he cultivated for himself. If he could not afford to pay it off, he would receive a half of the half, i.e., a quarter of the land, free. It was called pauper's allotment (bednyatskiy nadel). [11]

Though well planned in the legislation, the reform did not work smoothly. Many reform-minded peasants believed the manifesto's conditions were unacceptable: "In many localities the peasants refused to believe that the manifesto was genuine. There were troubles, and troops had to be called in to disperse the angry crowds." [12] The land-owners and nobility were paid in government bonds, with their debts deducted. The bonds soon fell in value. The management skills of the land-owners were generally poor.[ citation needed ]


The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia: Work in Freedom is the Foundation of a State (1914), by Alphonse Mucha, The Slav Epic Mucha Zruseni nevolnictvi.jpg
The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia: Work in Freedom is the Foundation of a State (1914), by Alphonse Mucha, The Slav Epic
Central Bank of Russia coin commemorating the 150th anniversary of the emancipation reform RR5220-0009R.png
Central Bank of Russia coin commemorating the 150th anniversary of the emancipation reform

Despite newly acquired freedom, the life of a serf remained grim in many aspects. Household serfs were the least benefited, gaining their freedom, but no land. Many bureaucrats believed that these reforms would bring about drastic changes that would only affect the "lower stories" of society, strengthening the autocracy. In reality, the reforms forced the monarch to coexist with an independent court, free press, and local governments—all operating differently and more freely than they had in the past. [13] :p. 110 This new form of local government involved in each area an assembly called a zemstvo . In regards to new localized government, the reforms put in place a system where the landowners were now able to have more of a say within their newly formed "provinces". [13] :p. 112 While this was not the direct intent of the reforms, it was evident that this significantly weakened the idea of the autocracy. Now, the "well-to-do" serfs, along with previously free peoples, were able to purchase land as private property. While early in the reforms the creation of local government had not changed many things about Russian society, the rise in capitalism drastically affected not only the social structure of Russia, but the behaviors and activities of the self-government institutions. [13] :p. 113 With new, capitalistic ideals, local government was not responsible for the rules and regulations dictating how the new market would operate. If there was a positive of this movement towards localized government, from the autocracy's point of view; it was (as Petr Valuev put it): the zemstvo would "provide activity for the considerable portion of the press as well as those malcontents who currently stir up trouble because they have nothing to do". [13] :p. 111

Effects on the serfs

The serfs of private estates received less land than they needed to survive, which led to civil unrest. The redemption tax was so high that the serfs had to sell all the grain they produced to pay the tax, which left nothing for their survival. Landowners also suffered because many of them were deeply in debt, and the forced selling of their land left them struggling to maintain their lavish lifestyle. In many cases, the newly freed serfs were forced to "rent" their land from wealthy landowners. Furthermore, when the peasants had to work for the same landowners to pay their "labor payments", they often neglected their own fields. [13] :p. 126 Over the next few years, the yields from the peasants' crops remained low, and soon famine struck a large portion of Russia. [13] :p. 127 With little food, and finding themselves in a similar condition as when they were serfs, many peasants started to voice their disdain for the new social system. On one occasion, on 12 April 1861, a local leader murdered a large number of uprising peasants in the village of Bezdna. [14] When the incident was over, the official report counted 70 peasants dead and another 100 wounded. After further investigation, and trial of some members of the uprising, five peasants were found guilty of "agitation" and not uprising. [14] That said, several different instances did take the form of an uprising. [14]


In Congress Poland and in northern Russia peasants became both free and landless ( batraks ), with only their labour to sell, while in other areas peasants became the majority land-owners in their province(s). The 1861 Emancipation Manifesto affected only the privately owned serfs. The state-owned serfs were emancipated in 1866 [1] and were given better and larger plots of land.

Lastly, the reforms transformed the Russian economy. The individuals who led the reform favored an economic system similar to that in other European countries, which promoted the ideas of capitalism and free trade. The reformers aimed to promote development and to encourage the ownership of private property, free competition, entrepreneurship, and hired labor.[ citation needed ] This they hoped would bring about an economic system with minimal regulations and tariffs, thus a more "laissez-faire" economy. Soon after the reforms there was a substantial rise in the amount of production of grain for sale. Because of this there was also a rise in the number of hired laborers and in farm machinery. [13] :p. 125 Furthermore, a significant measuring stick in the growth of the Russian economy post-reform was the huge growth in non-gentry private landownership. Although the gentry land-holdings fell from 80% to 50%, the peasant holdings grew from 5% all the way to 20%. [13] :p. 126

See also

Related Research Articles

Serfdom Status of peasants under feudalism

Serfdom was the status of many peasants under feudalism, specifically relating to manorialism, and similar systems. It was a condition of debt bondage and indentured servitude with similarities to and differences from slavery, which developed during the Late Antiquity and Early Middle Ages in Europe and lasted in some countries until the mid-19th century.

An absent landlord is one that is not around – this could be due to the fact that the freehold is owned by a company which has long since been dissolved or an individual who may be deceased or forgotten about their ownership.

Pyotr Stolypin Russian politician

Pyotr Arkadyevich Stolypin was a Russian politician. He was the third Prime Minister of Russia, and Minister of Internal Affairs of the Russian Empire from 1906 to his assassination in 1911.

Obshchina or mir, or selskoye obshchestvo, were peasant village communities as opposed to individual farmsteads, or khutors, in Imperial Russia. The term derives from the word obshchiy.

Serfdom in Russia Russian serfs were agrarian peasants legally bound to the land owned by nobility and who were deprived of rights and forced to provide free labor.

The term "serf", in the sense of an unfree peasant of tsarist Russia, is the usual English-language translation of krepostnoi krestyanin which meant an unfree person who, unlike a slave, historically could be sold only with the land to which he or she was "attached". Emperor Peter I ended slavery in Russia in 1723. Contemporary legal documents, such as Russkaya Pravda, distinguished several degrees of feudal dependency of peasants.

Pugachevs Rebellion Peasant revolt against Empress Catherine II of Russia

Pugachev's Rebellion of 1773-75 was the principal revolt in a series of popular rebellions that took place in the Russian Empire after Catherine II seized power in 1762. It began as an organized insurrection of Yaik Cossacks headed by Yemelyan Pugachev, a disaffected ex-lieutenant of the Imperial Russian Army, against a background of profound peasant unrest and war with the Ottoman Empire. After initial success, Pugachev assumed leadership of an alternative government in the name of the late Tsar Peter III and proclaimed an end to serfdom. This organized leadership presented a challenge to the imperial administration of Catherine II.

Nikolay Milyutin

Nikolay Alexeyevich Milyutin was a Russian statesman remembered as the chief architect of the great liberal reforms undertaken during Alexander II's reign, including the emancipation of the serfs and the establishment of zemstvo.

The Bezdna peasant revolt, also known as the Bezdna unrest was an uprising organized by Russian former serfs in the aftermath of the Emancipation reform of 1861 in Russia. In April 1861, serfs rose up in rebellion in the Spassky Uyezd of Kazan Governorate specifically a village of Bezdna.

The judicial system of the Russian Empire was established as part of the system of government reforms of Peter the Great.

Mahtra War was a peasant insurgency at the Mahtra estate in Estonia, in the then Russian Empire in May-July 1858.

Russian Empire Historical empire that extended across Eurasia and North America (1721-1917)

The Russian Empire was a historical empire that extended across Eurasia and North America from 1721, following the end of the Great Northern War, until the Republic was proclaimed by the Provisional Government that took power after the February Revolution of 1917. The third-largest empire in history, at its greatest extent stretching over three continents, Europe, Asia, and North America, the Russian Empire was surpassed in size only by the British and Mongol empires. The rise of the Russian Empire coincided with the decline of neighboring rival powers: the Swedish Empire, the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, Persia and the Ottoman Empire. It played a major role in 1812–1814 in defeating Napoleon's ambitions to control Europe and expanded to the west and south, becoming one of the most powerful European empires of all time.

Abolition of serfdom in Poland occurred over a period of time. At the end of 18th century a reform movement in Poland resulted in the Constitution of May 3, 1791 which took the peasantry under protection of state. Full abolishment of serfdom was enacted by the Proclamation of Połaniec on 7 May 1794, but it was also short-lived as Poland got partitioned by her neighbours in 1795, beginning first 12 years of Polish inexistence as an independent state and later another 103 years. In the 19th century various reforms on Polish territories were taking place. Namely in all three of the Austrian partition, Prussian partition and the Russian partition. Serfdom was abolished in Prussia in 1807, in Austria in 1848, in Russia in 1861. Despite these facts 7th May 1794 remains the date serfdom was abolished in Poland.

Serfdom in Poland

Serfdom in Poland became the dominant form of relationship between peasants and nobility in the 17th century, and was a major feature of the economy of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, although its origins can be traced back to the 12th century.

Slavery in Russia

Legalized private slavery in Russia ended in February 19th, 1861 when Russian Emperor Alexander II issued The Emancipation of Russia's serfs in 1861, for which he is known as Alexander the Liberator. Emancipation of state-owned serfs occurred in 1866.

History of serfdom

Like slavery, serfdom has a long history that dates to ancient times.

State serfs or state peasants were a special social estate (class) of peasantry in 18th–19th century Russia, the number of which in some periods reached half of the agricultural population. In contrast to private serfs, state serfs were considered personally free, although attached to the land. They were liberated in 1866.

The Government reforms imposed by Tsar Alexander II of Russia, often called the Great Reforms by historians, were a series of major social, political, legal and governmental reforms in the Russian Empire carried out in the 1860s.

The Party of Return to Serfdom was an ultra right-wing political party established in the 1800s during the Russian Empire. As its name suggests, it supported re-establishing serfdom in Russia, after the Emancipation Reform of 1861. The party's history is relatively limited to the late 1800s, and for the most part it served as a target of derision by liberal, progressive, or socialist reformers.

In the second half of the nineteenth century, it became clear that the preservation of the power and political influence of the Russian Empire is impossible without reform and transformation of the entire political system. Among the economic prerequisites, it should be noted the crisis of the landlord economy, the poverty of the peasants, the low purchasing power of the population, from which the underdevelopment of the domestic market ensued. Serfdom held back the development of the wage labor market and created a shortage of labor for industry. Therefore, the reign of Alexander II became a period of fundamental transformations of Russian society.

Livonian Peasants' Laws were laws introduced in the 19th century for Governorate of Livonia of the Russian Empire. About the same time similar laws has been enacted in all Baltic governorates and Duchy of Courland and Semigallia. These laws changed and clarified peasants rights and obligations, who ethically were mainly Estonians and Latvians. This development culminated in Peasant Community Code of 1866 which codified peasants self-governance.


  1. 1 2 3 4 Mee, Arthur; Hammerton, J.A.; Innes, Arthur D.; Harmsworth History of the World: Volume 7 , 1907, Carmelite House, London; p. 5193.
  2. 1 2 Corrin, Chris; Feihn, Terry (31 July 2015). AQA A-level History Tsarist and Communist Russia: 1855–1964. Hachette UK: Hodder Education; Dynamic Learning. p. 11. ISBN   978-1471837807 . Retrieved 8 September 2015. On 30 March 1856 Alexander II made a speech to the Marshalls of the Nobility in which he signalled the start of a process that led to the abolition of serfdom in 1861.
  3. Richard Pipes, Russia Under the Old Regime.
  4. Waldron, P. (2007) The Governing of Tsarist Russia Palgrave Macmillan p. 61 ISBN   978-0-333-71718-9
  5. Charles Wetherell, Andrejs Plakans, "Borders, ethnicity, and demographic patterns in the Russian Baltic provinces in the late nineteenth century", Continuity and Change (1999), 14: 33–56
  6. Powelson, John (1987). The Story of Land[A World History of Land Tenure and Agrarian Reform]. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. p. 115. ISBN   0899462189.
  7. Figes, Orlando (1996). A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution: 1891–1924. Jonathan Cape. ISBN   0-224-04162-2.
  8. Stakhiv, Eugene Z. (27 November 2015). "Taras Shevchenko: Aral Sea expeditionary". The Ukrainian Weekly.
  9. "Dmitry Medvedev took part in the conference The Great Reforms and Modernisation of Russia". Kremlin.ru. 3 March 2011.
  10. Worthington, Daryl (2 March 2015). "Alexander II Emancipates the Serfs". NewHistorian.
  11. Paxton, John (2004) [1999]. Leaders of Russia and the Soviet Union Since 1613 . London: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers. ISBN   978-0203505328. OCLC   437056484, 60161944 . Retrieved 2014-03-04.
  12. Peasant Wars of the 20th Century, Eric Wolf, 1969
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Polunov, Alexander (2005). Owen, Thomas C.; Zakharova, L.G. (eds.). Russia in the Nineteenth Century: Autocracy, Reform, And Social Change, 1814–1914. New Russian history. Marshall S. Shatz, translator. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. ISBN   978-0765606716. OCLC   191935709. Archived from the original on 2014-03-04.
  14. 1 2 3 Pushkarev, Sergei G (April 1968). "The Russian Peasants' Reaction to the Emancipation of 1861". Russian Review . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 27 (2): 199–214. doi:10.2307/127028. ISSN   1467-9434. JSTOR   127028. LCCN   43016148. OCLC   4892437069.

Further reading