Hansa-Brandenburg W.33

Last updated
W.33
HansaBrandenburgW33.jpg
RoleReconnaissance floatplane
Manufacturer Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke
Designer Hanns Klemm [1]
First flight1918
Introduction1918
Retired1936 (Finland)
Primary users Imperial Japanese Navy
Finnish Air Force, German Imperial Navy
Produced1918-1919 & 1921-1929
Number built491
Developed from Hansa-Brandenburg W.29

Hansa-Brandenburg W.33 was a German two-seat, single-engined low-wing monoplane floatplane, which had been developed by Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke during World War I as a higher powered enlargement of the similar Hansa-Brandenburg W.29 and despite the increase in size the two types are very difficult to differentiate. [2] Although the W.33 was built in small numbers during the war many license built versions were built after World War I.

Contents

History

The Hansa-Brandenburg W.33 aircraft was designed in 1918 by Dr. Hanns Klemm and began entering German service in late 1918. The first examples were powered with a 190 kW (260 hp) 6 cylinder inline Maybach Mb.IVa, but 8 cylinder inline 190 kW (260 hp) Mercedes D.IVa and 205–224 kW (275–300 hp) 6 cylinder inline Basse und Selve BuS.IVa engines were also fitted.

26 aircraft were built by Hansa-Brandenburg, but only seven were completed before the armistice. [3]

Licence production was carried out in Norway by Marinens Flyvebaatfabrikk (Naval Aircraft Factory) who built 24 for the Navy from 1920 until 1929 as the Maake II (or Make II in some translations), and Maake III, as well as one Maake III for the Army. [4] These had followed the Maake I, which was a licence-built Hansa-Brandenburg W.29. [4] In addition, six Maake IIs were completed at by Norsk Aeroplanefabrikk (Army Aircraft Factory) when the company initially contracted to build them failed to deliver, although these were later handed over to the Navy, along with four additional newly manufactured Maake IIIs built at Haerens Flyvenmaskinfabrikk/Kjeller Flyfabrikk , as the Army no longer had any need for them. [4] The Maake IIIs had some minor detail differences from the Maake IIs. [4] Most were built with 190 kW (260 hp) Mercedes D.IVa engines, [3] although examples built before 1923 were fitted with similar Benz engines developing from 160 to 190 kW (220 to 260 hp). [4] These were normally armed with a fixed Vickers machine gun and a flexible Lewis gun. [5] Lamblin radiators were used on Norwegian examples in lieu of the car type radiator mounted ahead of the engine that was otherwise normal for the type. [5] When the final examples were retired from the Navy in 1935 [3] two examples were given civil registrations (N-47 and N-48) and briefly used to deliver mail. [4]

In 1921, Finland obtained the manufacturing license for the W.33 and the first Finnish-built example flew on 4 November 1922, as the IVL A.22 Hansa. These were powered by 220 kW (300 hp) inline six-cylinder Fiat A-12bis engines due to shortages of the German engines. [3] This was the first aircraft to be mass-produced in Finland and 120 were eventually built [6] between 1922 and 1925, and the Finnish Air Force would operate the aircraft until 1936. [3] Armament was similar to the Norwegian examples, although two Lewis guns were sometimes fitted. Some of the Finnish aircraft also had their floats replaced with skis. [7]

Japan received a single W.33 as war reparations, and from 1922 to 1925, built 310 examples for the Imperial Japanese Navy. 160 of these were built by Nakajima and 150 were built by Aichi, with minor modifications, including the substitution of the German inline engine with a 160 kW (210 hp) water-cooled V-8 Mitsubishi Type Hi engine (a licence-built Hispano-Suiza V-8), and other detail changes to meet Japanese requirements. These were not popular in Japanese service due to inadequate directional control and poor downward visibility from the cockpit, but were flown from the battleship Nagato for seaplane trials in 1926. [8] By 1927, they were gradually being replaced, and the last examples were retired from military service in 1928, although some of these would continue in civilian service after having been converted with a cabin to seat 3-5 passengers by the Ando Aeroplane Research Studio and Japan Air Transport Research Association. [8]

Latvia received two IVL A.22s from the Finnish Air Force in December 1926, however both were completely wrecked the following March, prompting a major rebuild, which some sources have counted as two additional aircraft having been built. [4] It took until 1928 before they had been returned to service, and they remained in use until 1933. [4]

Variants

Hansa-Brandenburg W.33C3MG
standard version, armed with two fixed and one flexible machine gun, five built during WW1 [3]
Hansa-Brandenburg W.33C2MG HFT
equipped with radio and armed with one fixed gun, and one flexible gun, one built during WW1 [3]
Hansa-Brandenburg W.33CK
two fixed machine guns and a flexible Becker 20 mm (0.79 in) cannon, one built during WW1 [3]
Hansa-Brandenburg Make II and III
Norwegian W.33s built under licence, 35 built.
IVL A.22 Hansa
Finnish license manufactured W.33, 120 built with 220 kW (300 hp) Fiat A-12bis engines. [3]

Operators

Flag of Finland.svg  Finland
Finnish Air Force (Ilmavoimat)
Flag of the German Empire.svg  German Empire
Kaiserliche Marine (Marinefliegerkorps)
Flag of Japan.svg  Japan
Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service
Flag of Latvia.svg  Latvia
Latvian Navy / Air Force
Flag of Norway.svg  Norway
Royal Norwegian Navy Air Service (Marinens flyvevesen)
Norwegian Army Air Service (Hærens flyvåpen)

Survivors

The sole survivor of the type is an IVL A.22 Hansa in the Finnish Aviation Museum in Helsinki. [6]

Specifications (W.33CK)

Data fromHansa-Brandenburg : Aircraft of WWI Volume 3, Monoplane Seaplanes [4]

General characteristics

Performance

2,000 m (6,600 ft) in 12 minutes 48 seconds
3,000 m (9,800 ft) in 22 minutes 18 seconds

Armament

Avionics

See also

Related development

Related lists

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Friedrichshafen FF.33</span> Type of aircraft

Friedrichshafen FF.33 was a German single-engined reconnaissance three-bay wing structure biplane, using twin floats, designed by Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen in 1914 for the Marine-Fliegerabteilung aviation forces of the Kaiserliche Marine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rumpler 6B</span> Type of aircraft

The Rumpler 6B was a German single-engine floatplane fighter with a biplane wing structure, designed and built by Rumpler Flugzeugwerke, in Berlin Johannisthal and introduced in 1916.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hansa-Brandenburg KDW</span> German WW1 Floatplane

The Hansa-Brandenburg KDW was a German single-engine, single-seat, fighter floatplane of World War I. The KDW – Kampf Doppeldecker, Wasser – was adapted from the Hansa-Brandenburg D.I landplane to provide coastal defence over the North Sea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hansa-Brandenburg W.12</span> Type of aircraft

The Hansa-Brandenburg W.12 was a German biplane fighter floatplane of World War I. It was a development of Ernst Heinkel's previous KDW, adding a rear cockpit for an observer/gunner, and had an unusual inverted tailfin/rudder in order to give an uninterrupted field of fire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hansa-Brandenburg W.29</span> Type of aircraft

The Hansa-Brandenburg W.29 was a German two-seat fighter floatplane which served in the closing months of World War I with the Imperial German Navy's Naval Air Service from bases on the North Sea coast. In concept the aircraft was a monoplane version of the biplane Hansa-Brandenburg W.12, although there were many structural differences between the two.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Junkers W 33</span> German single-engine low-wing monoplane transport aircraft

The Junkers W 33 was a German 1920s single-engine low-wing monoplane transport aircraft that followed Junkers standard practice making extensive use of corrugated aluminium alloy over an aluminium alloy tube frame, that was developed from the similar but slightly smaller Junkers F 13, and evolved into the similar W 34. One example, named Bremen was the first aircraft to complete the much more difficult east–west non-stop heavier-than-air crossing of the Atlantic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hansa-Brandenburg C.I</span> German Armed Biplane

The Hansa-Brandenburg C.I, also known as Type LDD, was a 2-seater armed single-engine reconnaissance biplane designed by Ernst Heinkel, who worked at that time for the parent company in Germany. The C.I had similarities with the earlier B.I, including inward-sloping interplane bracing struts. Like other early-war Austro-Hungarian reconnaissance aircraft, such as C-types of Lloyd or Lohner, the Type LDD had a communal cockpit for its crew.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hansa-Brandenburg W.19</span> German fighter-reconnaissance aircraft of World War I

The Hansa-Brandenburg W.19 was a German fighter-reconnaissance aircraft of World War I. It was a single-engined two-seat biplane floatplane, and was a larger development of the successful W.12. It served with the Kaiserliche Marine during 1918.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hansa-Brandenburg CC</span> Flying boat

The Hansa-Brandenburg CC was a single-seat German fighter flying boat of World War I. It was used by both the Kaiserliche Marine and the Austro-Hungarian Navy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lohner L</span> Type of aircraft

The Lohner L was a reconnaissance flying boat produced in Austria-Hungary during World War I. It was a two-bay biplane of typical configuration for the flying boats of the day, with its pusher engine mounted on struts in the interplane gap. The pilot and observer sat side by side in an open cockpit, and both the upper and lower sets of wings featured sweepback.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hansa-Brandenburg W.11</span> Type of aircraft

The Hansa-Brandenburg W.11 was a fighter floatplane built in Germany in 1917 as a more powerful version of the KDW. Similar in general configuration to its predecessor, the W.11 shared the same unusual interplane strut arrangement, and featured fins above and below the fuselage. Only three examples were built.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hansa-Brandenburg W.27</span> Type of aircraft

The Hansa Brandenburg W.27 and W.32 were prototype fighter floatplanes developed in parallel in Germany during World War I. They were developments of and intended replacements for the W.12 then in service and differed from each other principally in the choice of powerplant, the W.27 with a Benz Bz.IIIb and the W.32 with the same Mercedes D.III that the original W.12 used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fizir F1V</span> Type of aircraft

The Fizir F1V was the basis from which engineer Rudolf Fizir developed a series of single-engined, two-seat, reconnaissance biplanes fitted with different engines. Construction was carried out in the Yugoslav aircraft factories Zmaj and Rogožarski between 1928 and 1932.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kawanishi K-8 Transport Seaplane</span> Japanese mail floatplane

The Kawanishi K-8 Transport Seaplane was a Japanese single-engined floatplane of the 1920s. Seven were built in 1926 and 1927, and were used to operate airmail services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeppelin-Lindau CS.I</span> Type of aircraft

The Zeppelin-Lindau CS.I was a German single-engined reconnaissance seaplane with a low-wing monoplane layout.

The Hansa-Brandenburg W.16 was a floatplane fighter built in Germany during World War I for the Imperial German Navy.

Hansa-Brandenburg W.34 was a prototype German two-seat, single-engined floatplane, which had been designed by Hansa und Brandenburgische Flugzeugwerke during World War I.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hansa-Brandenburg W.18</span> WWI German flying boat

The Hansa-Brandenburg W.18 was a single-seat German fighter flying boat of World War I. It was used by both the Kaiserliche Marine and the Austro-Hungarian Navy.

The Hansa-Brandenburg W.25 was a German floatplane fighter of the World War I era, designed and built by Hansa-Brandenburg.

The Hansa-Brandenburg W.23 was a German flying-boat fighter of World War I.

References

Citations

  1. Grosz, 1996, pp.2-3
  2. Grosz, 1996, pp.13
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Herris, 2012, p.110
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Owers, 2015, pp.66-123
  5. 1 2 Herris, 2012, p.112
  6. 1 2 Owers, 1998, pp.58-62
  7. Herris, 2012, p.113
  8. 1 2 Mikesh, 1990, p.271

Bibliography