Last updated

Hinduism is an Indian religion and dharma , or way of life. [note 1] [note 2] It is the world's third-largest religion with over 1.25 billion followers, or 15–16% of the global population, known as Hindus. [web 1] [web 2] The word Hindu is an exonym, [1] [2] and while Hinduism has been called the oldest religion in the world, [note 3] many practitioners refer to their religion as Sanātana Dharma (Sanskrit : सनातन धर्म: "the Eternal Way"), which refers to the idea that its origins lie beyond human history, as revealed in the Hindu texts. [3] [4] [5] [6] [note 4] Another, though less fitting, [7] self-designation is Vaidika dharma, [8] [9] [10] [11] the 'dharma related to the Vedas.' [web 3]


Hinduism includes a range of philosophies, and is linked by shared concepts, recognisable rituals, cosmology, pilgrimage to sacred sites and shared textual resources that discuss theology, philosophy, mythology, Vedic yajna, Yoga, agamic rituals, and temple building, among other topics. [12] Hinduism prescribes the eternal duties, such as honesty, refraining from injuring living beings ( Ahiṃsā ), patience, forbearance, self-restraint, virtue, and compassion, among others. [web 4] [13] Prominent themes in Hindu beliefs include the four Puruṣārthas, the proper goals or aims of human life; namely, Dharma (ethics/duties), Artha (prosperity/work), Kama (desires/passions) and Moksha (liberation/freedom from the cycle of death and rebirth/salvation), [14] [15] as well as karma (action, intent and consequences) and Saṃsāra (cycle of death and rebirth). [16] [17]

Hindu practices include rituals such as pujā (worship) and recitations, japa, meditation (dhyāna), family-oriented rites of passage, annual festivals, and occasional pilgrimages. Along with the practice of various Yogas, some Hindus leave their social world and material possessions and engage in lifelong Sannyasa (monasticism) in order to achieve Moksha. [18]

Hindu texts are classified into Śruti ("heard") and Smṛti ("remembered"), the major scriptures of which are the Vedas, the Upanishads , the Purānas , the Mahābhārata , the Rāmāyana , and the Āgamas. [19] [16] There are six āstika schools of Hindu philosophy, who recognise the authority of the Vedas, namely Sānkhya, Yoga, Nyāya, Vaisheshika, Mimāmsā and Vedānta. [20] [21] [22]

While the Puranic chronology presents a geneaology of thousands of years, starting with the Vedic rishis, scholars regard Hinduism as a fusion [note 5] or synthesis [23] [note 6] of Brahmanical orthopraxy [note 7] with various Indian cultures, [24] [25] having diverse roots [26] [note 8] and no specific founder. [27] This Hindu synthesis emerged after the Vedic period, between ca. 500 [28] –200 [29] BCE and c. 300 CE, [28] in the period of the Second Urbanisation and the early classical period of Hinduism, when the Epics and the first Purānas were composed. [28] [29] It flourished in the medieval period, with the decline of Buddhism in India. [30]

Currently, the four largest denominations of Hinduism are the Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism and Smartism. [31] Sources of authority and eternal truths in the Hindu texts play an important role, but there is also a strong Hindu tradition of questioning authority in order to deepen the understanding of these truths and to further develop the tradition. [32] Hinduism is the most widely professed faith in India, Nepal and Mauritius. Significant numbers of Hindu communities are found in Southeast Asia including in Bali, Indonesia, [33] the Caribbean, North America, Europe, Oceania, Africa, and other regions. [34] [35]


A Balinese Hindu family after puja at Bratan temple in Bali, Indonesia. Bratan Bali Indonesia Balinese-family-after-Puja-01.jpg
A Balinese Hindu family after puja at Bratan temple in Bali, Indonesia.

The word Hindū is derived from Indo-Aryan [36] /Sanskrit [37] root Sindhu. [37] [38] The Proto-Iranian sound change *s > h occurred between 850 and 600 BCE, according to Asko Parpola. [39]

The use of the English term "Hinduism" to describe a collection of practices and beliefs is a fairly recent construction: it was first used by Raja Ram Mohun Roy in 1816–17. [40] The term "Hinduism" was coined in around 1830 by those Indians who opposed British colonialism, and who wanted to distinguish themselves from other religious groups. [40] [41] [42] Before the British began to categorise communities strictly by religion, Indians generally did not define themselves exclusively through their religious beliefs; instead identities were largely segmented on the basis of locality, language, varna, jāti, occupation and sect. [43]

The word "Hindu" is much older, and it is believed that it was used as the name for the Indus River in the northwestern part of the Indian subcontinent. [40] [37] [note 9] According to Gavin Flood, "The actual term Hindu first occurs as a Persian geographical term for the people who lived beyond the river Indus (Sanskrit: Sindhu)", [37] more specifically in the 6th-century BCE inscription of Darius I (550–486 BCE). [44] The term Hindu in these ancient records is a geographical term and did not refer to a religion. [37] Among the earliest known records of 'Hindu' with connotations of religion may be in the 7th-century CE Chinese text Record of the Western Regions by Xuanzang, [44] and 14th-century Persian text Futuhu's-salatin by 'Abd al-Malik Isami. [note 10]

Thapar states that the word Hindu is found as heptahindu in Avesta – equivalent to Rigvedic sapta sindhu, while hndstn (pronounced Hindustan) is found in a Sasanian inscription from the 3rd century CE, both of which refer to parts of northwestern South Asia. [45] The Arabic term al-Hind referred to the people who live across the River Indus. [46] This Arabic term was itself taken from the pre-Islamic Persian term Hindū, which refers to all Indians. By the 13th century, Hindustan emerged as a popular alternative name of India, meaning the "land of Hindus". [47] [note 11]

The term Hindu was later used occasionally in some Sanskrit texts such as the later Rajataranginis of Kashmir (Hinduka, c. 1450) and some 16th- to 18th-century Bengali Gaudiya Vaishnava texts including Chaitanya Charitamrita and Chaitanya Bhagavata . These texts used it to distinguish Hindus from Muslims who are called Yavanas (foreigners) or Mlecchas (barbarians), with the 16th-century Chaitanya Charitamrita text and the 17th-century Bhakta Mala text using the phrase "Hindu dharma". [49] It was only towards the end of the 18th century that European merchants and colonists began to refer to the followers of Indian religions collectively as Hindus.

The term Hinduism, then spelled Hindooism, was introduced into the English language in the 18th century to denote the religious, philosophical, and cultural traditions native to India. [50]


Hinduism includes a diversity of ideas on spirituality and traditions, but has no ecclesiastical order, no unquestionable religious authorities, no governing body, no prophet(s) nor any binding holy book; Hindus can choose to be polytheistic, pantheistic, panentheistic, pandeistic, henotheistic, monotheistic, monistic, agnostic, atheistic or humanist. [51] [52] [53] According to Doniger, "ideas about all the major issues of faith and lifestyle - vegetarianism, nonviolence, belief in rebirth, even caste - are subjects of debate, not dogma." [43]

Because of the wide range of traditions and ideas covered by the term Hinduism, arriving at a comprehensive definition is difficult. [37] The religion "defies our desire to define and categorize it". [54] Hinduism has been variously defined as a religion, a religious tradition, a set of religious beliefs, and "a way of life". [55] [note 1] From a Western lexical standpoint, Hinduism like other faiths is appropriately referred to as a religion. In India, the term dharma is preferred, which is broader than the Western term religion.

The study of India and its cultures and religions, and the definition of "Hinduism", has been shaped by the interests of colonialism and by Western notions of religion. [56] [57] Since the 1990s, those influences and its outcomes have been the topic of debate among scholars of Hinduism, [56] [note 12] and have also been taken over by critics of the Western view on India. [58] [note 13]


AUM, a stylised letter of Devanagari script, used as a religious symbol in Hinduism Aum Om navy blue circle coral.svg
AUM, a stylised letter of Devanagari script, used as a religious symbol in Hinduism

Hinduism as it is commonly known can be subdivided into a number of major currents. Of the historical division into six darsanas (philosophies), two schools, Vedanta and Yoga, are currently the most prominent. [20] Classified by primary deity or deities, four major Hinduism modern currents are Vaishnavism (Vishnu), Shaivism (Shiva), Shaktism (Devi) and Smartism (five deities treated as same). [59] [60] Hinduism also accepts numerous divine beings, with many Hindus considering the deities to be aspects or manifestations of a single impersonal absolute or ultimate reality or God, while some Hindus maintain that a specific deity represents the supreme and various deities are lower manifestations of this supreme. [61] Other notable characteristics include a belief in the existence of ātman (soul, self), reincarnation of one's ātman, and karma as well as a belief in dharma (duties, rights, laws, conduct, virtues and right way of living).

McDaniel (2007) classifies Hinduism into six major kinds and numerous minor kinds, in order to understand the expression of emotions among the Hindus. [62] The major kinds, according to McDaniel are Folk Hinduism, based on local traditions and cults of local deities and is the oldest, non-literate system; Vedic Hinduism based on the earliest layers of the Vedas traceable to 2nd millennium BCE; Vedantic Hinduism based on the philosophy of the Upanishads, including Advaita Vedanta, emphasizing knowledge and wisdom; Yogic Hinduism, following the text of Yoga Sutras of Patanjali emphasizing introspective awareness; Dharmic Hinduism or "daily morality", which McDaniel states is stereotyped in some books as the "only form of Hindu religion with a belief in karma, cows and caste"; and Bhakti or devotional Hinduism, where intense emotions are elaborately incorporated in the pursuit of the spiritual. [62]

Michaels distinguishes three Hindu religions and four forms of Hindu religiosity. [63] The three Hindu religions are "Brahmanic-Sanskritic Hinduism", "folk religions and tribal religions", and "founded religions". [64] The four forms of Hindu religiosity are the classical "karma-marga", [65] jnana-marga, [66] bhakti-marga, [66] and "heroism", which is rooted in militaristic traditions. These militaristic traditions include Ramaism (the worship of a hero of epic literature, Rama, believing him to be an incarnation of Vishnu) [67] and parts of political Hinduism. [65] "Heroism" is also called virya-marga. [66] According to Michaels, one out of nine Hindu belongs by birth to one or both of the Brahmanic-Sanskritic Hinduism and Folk religion typology, whether practicing or non-practicing. He classifies most Hindus as belonging by choice to one of the "founded religions" such as Vaishnavism and Shaivism that are salvation-focussed and often de-emphasize Brahman priestly authority yet incorporate ritual grammar of Brahmanic-Sanskritic Hinduism. [68] He includes among "founded religions" Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism that are now distinct religions, syncretic movements such as Brahmo Samaj and the Theosophical Society, as well as various "Guru-isms" and new religious movements such as Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and ISKCON. [69]

Inden states that the attempt to classify Hinduism by typology started in the imperial times, when proselytizing missionaries and colonial officials sought to understand and portray Hinduism from their interests. [70] Hinduism was construed as emanating not from a reason of spirit but fantasy and creative imagination, not conceptual but symbolical, not ethical but emotive, not rational or spiritual but of cognitive mysticism. This stereotype followed and fit, states Inden, with the imperial imperatives of the era, providing the moral justification for the colonial project. [70] From tribal Animism to Buddhism, everything was subsumed as part of Hinduism. The early reports set the tradition and scholarly premises for the typology of Hinduism, as well as the major assumptions and flawed presuppositions that have been at the foundation of Indology. Hinduism, according to Inden, has been neither what imperial religionists stereotyped it to be, nor is it appropriate to equate Hinduism to be merely the monist pantheism and philosophical idealism of Advaita Vedanta. [70]

Hindu views

Sanātana Dharma

To its adherents, Hinduism is a traditional way of life. [71] Many practitioners refer to the "orthodox" form of Hinduism as Sanātana Dharma , "the eternal law" or the "eternal way". [72] [73] Hindus regard Hinduism to be thousands of years old. The Puranic chronology, the timeline of events in ancient Indian history as narrated in the Mahabaratha, the Ramayana, and the Puranas, envisions a chronology of events related to Hinduism starting well before 3000 BCE. The Sanskrit word dharma has a much broader meaning than religion and is not its equivalent. All aspects of a Hindu life, namely acquiring wealth (artha), fulfillment of desires (kama), and attaining liberation (moksha), are part of dharma, which encapsulates the "right way of living" and eternal harmonious principles in their fulfillment. [74] [75]

According to the editors of the Encyclopædia Britannica, Sanātana Dharma historically referred to the "eternal" duties religiously ordained in Hinduism, duties such as honesty, refraining from injuring living beings ( ahimsa ), purity, goodwill, mercy, patience, forbearance, self-restraint, generosity, and asceticism. These duties applied regardless of a Hindu's class, caste, or sect, and they contrasted with svadharma, one's "own duty", in accordance with one's class or caste (varna) and stage in life (puruṣārtha). [web 4] In recent years, the term has been used by Hindu leaders, reformers, and nationalists to refer to Hinduism. Sanatana dharma has become a synonym for the "eternal" truth and teachings of Hinduism, that transcend history and are "unchanging, indivisible and ultimately nonsectarian". [web 4]

According to other scholars such as Kim Knott and Brian Hatcher, Sanātana Dharma refers to "timeless, eternal set of truths" and this is how Hindus view the origins of their religion. It is viewed as those eternal truths and tradition with origins beyond human history, truths divinely revealed (Shruti) in the Vedas – the most ancient of the world's scriptures. [76] [4] To many Hindus, the Western term "religion" to the extent it means "dogma and an institution traceable to a single founder" is inappropriate for their tradition, states Hatcher. Hinduism, to them, is a tradition that can be traced at least to the ancient Vedic era. [4] [77] [note 14]

Vaidika dharma

Some have referred to Hinduism as the Vaidika dharma. [8] The word 'Vaidika' in Sanskrit means 'derived from or conformable to the Veda' or 'relating to the Veda'. [web 3] Traditional scholars employed the terms Vaidika and Avaidika, those who accept the Vedas as a source of authoritative knowledge and those who do not, to differentiate various Indian schools from Jainism, Buddhism and Charvaka. According to Klaus Klostermaier, the term Vaidika dharma is the earliest self-designation of Hinduism. [9] [10] According to Arvind Sharma, the historical evidence suggests that "the Hindus were referring to their religion by the term vaidika dharma or a variant thereof" by the 4th-century CE. [11] According to Brian K. Smith, "[i]t is 'debatable at the very least' as to whether the term Vaidika Dharma cannot, with the proper concessions to historical, cultural and ideological specificity, be comparable to and translated as 'Hinduism' or 'Hindu religion'." [7]

According to Alexis Sanderson, the early Sanskrit texts differentiate between Vaidika, Vaishnava, Shaiva, Shakta, Saura, Buddhist and Jaina traditions. However, the late 1st-millennium CE Indic consensus had "indeed come to conceptualize a complex entity corresponding to Hinduism as opposed to Buddhism and Jainism excluding only certain forms of antinomian Shakta-Shaiva" from its fold. [web 5] Some in the Mimamsa school of Hindu philosophy considered the Agamas such as the Pancaratrika to be invalid because it did not conform to the Vedas. Some Kashmiri scholars rejected the esoteric tantric traditions to be a part of Vaidika dharma. [web 5] [web 6] The Atimarga Shaivism ascetic tradition, datable to about 500 CE, challenged the Vaidika frame and insisted that their Agamas and practices were not only valid, they were superior than those of the Vaidikas. [web 7] However, adds Sanderson, this Shaiva ascetic tradition viewed themselves as being genuinely true to the Vedic tradition and "held unanimously that the Śruti and Smṛti of Brahmanism are universally and uniquely valid in their own sphere, [...] and that as such they [Vedas] are man's sole means of valid knowledge [...]". [web 7]

The term Vaidika dharma means a code of practice that is "based on the Vedas", but it is unclear what "based on the Vedas" really implies, states Julius Lipner. [77] The Vaidika dharma or "Vedic way of life", states Lipner, does not mean "Hinduism is necessarily religious" or that Hindus have a universally accepted "conventional or institutional meaning" for that term. [77] To many, it is as much a cultural term. Many Hindus do not have a copy of the Vedas nor have they ever seen or personally read parts of a Veda, like a Christian, might relate to the Bible or a Muslim might to the Quran. Yet, states Lipner, "this does not mean that their [Hindus] whole life's orientation cannot be traced to the Vedas or that it does not in some way derive from it". [77]

Though many religious Hindus implicitly acknowledge the authority of the Vedas, this acknowledgment is often "no more than a declaration that someone considers himself [or herself] a Hindu," [79] [note 15] and "most Indians today pay lip service to the Veda and have no regard for the contents of the text." [80] Some Hindus challenge the authority of the Vedas, thereby implicitly acknowledging its importance to the history of Hinduism, states Lipner. [77]

Hindu modernism

Swami Vivekananda was a key figure in introducing Vedanta and Yoga in Europe and the United States, raising interfaith awareness and making Hinduism a world religion. Swami Vivekananda-1893-09-signed.jpg
Swami Vivekananda was a key figure in introducing Vedanta and Yoga in Europe and the United States, raising interfaith awareness and making Hinduism a world religion.

Beginning in the 19th century, Indian modernists re-asserted Hinduism as a major asset of Indian civilisation, [57] meanwhile "purifying" Hinduism from its Tantric elements [83] and elevating the Vedic elements. Western stereotypes were reversed, emphasizing the universal aspects, and introducing modern approaches of social problems. [57] This approach had a great appeal, not only in India, but also in the west. [57] Major representatives of "Hindu modernism" [84] are Raja Rammohan Roy, Vivekananda, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and Mahatma Gandhi. [85] [Raja Rammohan Roy is known as the father of the Hindu Renaissance. [86] He was a major influence on Swami Vivekananda (1863–1902), who, according to Flood, was "a figure of great importance in the development of a modern Hindu self-understanding and in formulating the West's view of Hinduism". [87] Central to his philosophy is the idea that the divine exists in all beings, that all human beings can achieve union with this "innate divinity", [84] and that seeing this divine as the essence of others will further love and social harmony. [84] According to Vivekananda, there is an essential unity to Hinduism, which underlies the diversity of its many forms. [84] According to Flood, Vivekananda's vision of Hinduism "is one generally accepted by most English-speaking middle-class Hindus today". [88] Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan sought to reconcile western rationalism with Hinduism, "presenting Hinduism as an essentially rationalistic and humanistic religious experience". [89]

This "Global Hinduism" [90] has a worldwide appeal, transcending national boundaries [90] and, according to Flood, "becoming a world religion alongside Christianity, Islam and Buddhism", [90] both for the Hindu diaspora communities and for westerners who are attracted to non-western cultures and religions. [90] It emphasizes universal spiritual values such as social justice, peace and "the spiritual transformation of humanity". [90] It has developed partly due to "re-enculturation", [91] or the Pizza effect, [91] in which elements of Hindu culture have been exported to the West, gaining popularity there, and as a consequence also gained greater popularity in India. [91] This globalization of Hindu culture brought "to the West teachings which have become an important cultural force in western societies, and which in turn have become an important cultural force in India, their place of origin". [92]

The definition of Hinduism in Indian Law is: "Acceptance of the Vedas with reverence; recognition of the fact that the means or ways to salvation are diverse; and realization of the truth that the number of gods to be worshipped is large". [93] [94]

Scholarly views

The term Hinduism was coined in Western ethnography in the 18th century, [50] [note 16] and refers to the fusion [note 5] or synthesis [note 6] [23] of various Indian cultures and traditions, [24] [25] with diverse roots [26] [note 8] and no founder. [27] This Hindu synthesis emerged after the Vedic period, between c. 500 [28] –200 [29] BCE and c. 300 CE, [28] in the period of the Second Urbanisation and the early classical period of Hinduism, when the Epics and the first Puranas were composed. [28] [29] It flourished in the medieval period, with the decline of Buddhism in India. [30] Hinduism's tolerance to variations in belief and its broad range of traditions make it difficult to define as a religion according to traditional Western conceptions. [95]

Some academics suggest that Hinduism can be seen as a category with "fuzzy edges" rather than as a well-defined and rigid entity. Some forms of religious expression are central to Hinduism and others, while not as central, still remain within the category. Based on this idea Gabriella Eichinger Ferro-Luzzi has developed a 'Prototype Theory approach' to the definition of Hinduism. [96]

Diversity and unity


Ganesha is one of the best-known and most worshipped deities in the Hindu pantheon Ganapati.1..JPG
Ganesha is one of the best-known and most worshipped deities in the Hindu pantheon

Hindu beliefs are vast and diverse, and thus Hinduism is often referred to as a family of religions rather than a single religion. [web 9] Within each religion in this family of religions, there are different theologies, practices, and sacred texts. [web 10] [97] [98] [99] [web 11] Hinduism does not have a "unified system of belief encoded in a declaration of faith or a creed", [37] but is rather an umbrella term comprising the plurality of religious phenomena of India. [100] [101] According to the Supreme Court of India,

Unlike other religions in the World, the Hindu religion does not claim any one Prophet, it does not worship any one God, it does not believe in any one philosophic concept, it does not follow any one act of religious rites or performances; in fact, it does not satisfy the traditional features of a religion or creed. It is a way of life and nothing more". [102]

Part of the problem with a single definition of the term Hinduism is the fact that Hinduism does not have a founder. [103] It is a synthesis of various traditions, [104] the "Brahmanical orthopraxy, the renouncer traditions and popular or local traditions". [105]

Theism is also difficult to use as a unifying doctrine for Hinduism, because while some Hindu philosophies postulate a theistic ontology of creation, other Hindus are or have been atheists. [106]

Sense of unity

Despite the differences, there is also a sense of unity. [107] Most Hindu traditions revere a body of religious or sacred literature, the Vedas, [108] although there are exceptions. [109] These texts are a reminder of the ancient cultural heritage and point of pride for Hindus, [110] [111] with Louis Renou stating that "even in the most orthodox domains, the reverence to the Vedas has come to be a simple raising of the hat". [110] [112]

Halbfass states that, although Shaivism and Vaishnavism may be regarded as "self-contained religious constellations", [107] there is a degree of interaction and reference between the "theoreticians and literary representatives" [107] of each tradition that indicates the presence of "a wider sense of identity, a sense of coherence in a shared context and of inclusion in a common framework and horizon". [107]

Classical Hinduism

Brahmins played an essential role in the development of the post-Vedic Hindu synthesis, disseminating Vedic culture to local communities, and integrating local religiosity into the trans-regional Brahmanic culture. [113] In the post-Gupta period Vedanta developed in southern India, where orthodox Brahmanic culture and the Hindu culture were preserved, [114] building on ancient Vedic traditions while "accommoda[ting] the multiple demands of Hinduism." [115]

Medieval developments

The notion of common denominators for several religions and traditions of India further developed from the 12th century CE. [116] Lorenzen traces the emergence of a "family resemblance", and what he calls as "beginnings of medieval and modern Hinduism" taking shape, at c. 300–600 CE, with the development of the early Puranas, and continuities with the earlier Vedic religion. [117] Lorenzen states that the establishment of a Hindu self-identity took place "through a process of mutual self-definition with a contrasting Muslim Other". [118] According to Lorenzen, this "presence of the Other" [118] is necessary to recognise the "loose family resemblance" among the various traditions and schools. [119]

According to the Indologist Alexis Sanderson, before Islam arrived in India, the "Sanskrit sources differentiated Vaidika, Vaiṣṇava, Śaiva, Śākta, Saura, Buddhist, and Jaina traditions, but they had no name that denotes the first five of these as a collective entity over and against Buddhism and Jainism". This absence of a formal name, states Sanderson, does not mean that the corresponding concept of Hinduism did not exist. By late 1st-millennium CE, the concept of a belief and tradition distinct from Buddhism and Jainism had emerged. [web 5] This complex tradition accepted in its identity almost all of what is currently Hinduism, except certain antinomian tantric movements. [web 5] Some conservative thinkers of those times questioned whether certain Shaiva, Vaishnava and Shakta texts or practices were consistent with the Vedas, or were invalid in their entirety. Moderates then, and most orthoprax scholars later, agreed that though there are some variations, the foundation of their beliefs, the ritual grammar, the spiritual premises, and the soteriologies were the same. "This sense of greater unity", states Sanderson, "came to be called Hinduism". [web 5]

According to Nicholson, already between the 12th and the 16th centuries "certain thinkers began to treat as a single whole the diverse philosophical teachings of the Upanishads, epics, Puranas, and the schools known retrospectively as the 'six systems' (saddarsana) of mainstream Hindu philosophy." [120] The tendency of "a blurring of philosophical distinctions" has also been noted by Burley. [121] Hacker called this "inclusivism" [108] and Michaels speaks of "the identificatory habit". [12] Lorenzen locates the origins of a distinct Hindu identity in the interaction between Muslims and Hindus, [122] and a process of "mutual self-definition with a contrasting Muslim other", [123] [44] which started well before 1800. [124] Michaels notes:

As a counteraction to Islamic supremacy and as part of the continuing process of regionalization, two religious innovations developed in the Hindu religions: the formation of sects and a historicization which preceded later nationalism ... [S]aints and sometimes militant sect leaders, such as the Marathi poet Tukaram (1609–1649) and Ramdas (1608–1681), articulated ideas in which they glorified Hinduism and the past. The Brahmins also produced increasingly historical texts, especially eulogies and chronicles of sacred sites (Mahatmyas), or developed a reflexive passion for collecting and compiling extensive collections of quotations on various subjects. [125]

Colonial period and neo-Vedanta

This inclusivism [126] was further developed in the 19th and 20th centuries by Hindu reform movements and Neo-Vedanta, [127] and has become characteristic of modern Hinduism. [108]

The notion and reports on "Hinduism" as a "single world religious tradition" [128] was also popularised by 19th-century proselytizing missionaries and European Indologists, roles sometimes served by the same person, who relied on texts preserved by Brahmins (priests) for their information of Indian religions, and animist observations that the missionary Orientalists presumed was Hinduism. [128] [70] [129] These reports influenced perceptions about Hinduism. Scholars such as Pennington state that the colonial polemical reports led to fabricated stereotypes where Hinduism was mere mystic paganism devoted to the service of devils, [note 17] while other scholars state that the colonial constructions influenced the belief that the Vedas, Bhagavad Gita , Manusmriti and such texts were the essence of Hindu religiosity, and in the modern association of 'Hindu doctrine' with the schools of Vedanta (in particular Advaita Vedanta) as a paradigmatic example of Hinduism's mystical nature". [131] [note 18] Pennington, while concurring that the study of Hinduism as a world religion began in the colonial era, disagrees that Hinduism is a colonial European era invention. [138] He states that the shared theology, common ritual grammar and way of life of those who identify themselves as Hindus is traceable to ancient times. [138] [note 19]

Modern India

The Hindutva movement has extensively argued for the unity of Hinduism, dismissing the differences and regarding India as a Hindu-country since ancient times.


Temple wall panel relief sculpture at the Hoysaleswara temple in Halebidu, representing the Trimurti: Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu Halebid3.JPG
Temple wall panel relief sculpture at the Hoysaleswara temple in Halebidu, representing the Trimurti: Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu

Prominent themes in Hindu beliefs include (but are not restricted to) Dharma (ethics/duties), Samsāra (the continuing cycle of birth, life, death, and rebirth), Karma (action, intent, and consequences), Moksha (liberation from samsara or liberation in this life), and the various Yogas (paths or practices). [17]

Purusharthas (objectives of human life)

Classical Hindu thought accepts four proper goals or aims of human life, known as Puruṣārthas: Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha. [14] [15]

Dharma (righteousness, ethics)

Dharma is considered the foremost goal of a human being in Hinduism. [145] The concept Dharma includes behaviors that are considered to be in accord with rta, the order that makes life and universe possible, [146] and includes duties, rights, laws, conduct, virtues and "right way of living". [147] Hindu Dharma includes the religious duties, moral rights and duties of each individual, as well as behaviors that enable social order, right conduct, and those that are virtuous. [147] Dharma, according to Van Buitenen, [148] is that which all existing beings must accept and respect to sustain harmony and order in the world. It is, states Van Buitenen, the pursuit and execution of one's nature and true calling, thus playing one's role in cosmic concert. [148] The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad states it as:

Nothing is higher than Dharma. The weak overcomes the stronger by Dharma, as over a king. Truly that Dharma is the Truth (Satya); Therefore, when a man speaks the Truth, they say, "He speaks the Dharma"; and if he speaks Dharma, they say, "He speaks the Truth!" For both are one.

In the Mahabharata, Krishna defines dharma as upholding both this-worldly and other-worldly affairs. (Mbh 12.110.11). The word Sanātana means eternal, perennial, or forever; thus, Sanātana Dharma signifies that it is the dharma that has neither beginning nor end. [151]

Artha (livelihood, wealth)

Artha is objective and virtuous pursuit of wealth for livelihood, obligations, and economic prosperity. It is inclusive of political life, diplomacy, and material well-being. The Artha concept includes all "means of life", activities and resources that enables one to be in a state one wants to be in, wealth, career and financial security. [152] The proper pursuit of artha is considered an important aim of human life in Hinduism. [153] [154]

Kāma (sensual pleasure)

Kāma (Sanskrit, Pali: काम) means desire, wish, passion, longing, pleasure of the senses, the aesthetic enjoyment of life, affection, or love, with or without sexual connotations. [155] [156] In Hinduism, Kama is considered an essential and healthy goal of human life when pursued without sacrificing Dharma, Artha and Moksha. [157]

Mokṣa (liberation, freedom from samsara)

Moksha (Sanskrit: मोक्षmokṣa) or mukti (Sanskrit: मुक्ति) is the ultimate, most important goal in Hinduism. In one sense, Moksha is a concept associated with liberation from sorrow, suffering and saṃsāra (birth-rebirth cycle). A release from this eschatological cycle, in after life, particularly in theistic schools of Hinduism is called moksha. [158] [148] [159] [160] Due to belief in the indestructibility of the soul, [161] death is deemed insignificant with respect to the cosmic self. [162]

The meaning of moksha differs among the various Hindu schools of thought. For example, Advaita Vedanta holds that after attaining moksha a person knows their "soul, self" and identifies it as one with Brahman and everyone in all respects. [163] [164] The followers of Dvaita (dualistic) schools, in moksha state, identify individual "soul, self" as distinct from Brahman but infinitesimally close, and after attaining moksha expect to spend eternity in a loka (heaven). To theistic schools of Hinduism, moksha is liberation from samsara, while for other schools such as the monistic school, moksha is possible in current life and is a psychological concept. [165] [163] [166] [164] According to Deutsch, moksha is transcendental consciousness to the latter, the perfect state of being, of self-realization, of freedom and of "realizing the whole universe as the Self". [165] [163] [166] Moksha in these schools of Hinduism, suggests Klaus Klostermaier, [164] implies a setting free of hitherto fettered faculties, a removing of obstacles to an unrestricted life, permitting a person to be more truly a person in the full sense; the concept presumes an unused human potential of creativity, compassion and understanding which had been blocked and shut out. Moksha is more than liberation from life-rebirth cycle of suffering (samsara); Vedantic school separates this into two: jivanmukti (liberation in this life) and videhamukti (liberation after death). [164] [167] [168]

Karma and samsara

Karma translates literally as action, work, or deed, [169] and also refers to a Vedic theory of "moral law of cause and effect". [170] [171] The theory is a combination of (1) causality that may be ethical or non-ethical; (2) ethicization, that is good or bad actions have consequences; and (3) rebirth. [172] Karma theory is interpreted as explaining the present circumstances of an individual with reference to his or her actions in the past. These actions and their consequences may be in a person's current life, or, according to some schools of Hinduism, in past lives. [172] [173] This cycle of birth, life, death and rebirth is called samsara . Liberation from samsara through moksha is believed to ensure lasting happiness and peace. [174] [175] Hindu scriptures teach that the future is both a function of current human effort derived from free will and past human actions that set the circumstances. [176]

Concept of God

Hinduism is a diverse system of thought with a wide variety of beliefs; [51] [177] [web 12] its concept of God is complex and depends upon each individual and the tradition and philosophy followed. It is sometimes referred to as henotheistic (i.e., involving devotion to a single god while accepting the existence of others), but any such term is an overgeneralization. [178] [179]

Who really knows?
Who will here proclaim it?
Whence was it produced? Whence is this creation?
The gods came afterwards, with the creation of this universe.
Who then knows whence it has arisen?

Nasadiya Sukta, concerns the origin of the universe, Rig Veda, 10:129–6 [180] [181] [182]

The Nasadiya Sukta (Creation Hymn) of the Rig Veda is one of the earliest texts [183] which "demonstrates a sense of metaphysical speculation" about what created the universe, the concept of god(s) and The One, and whether even The One knows how the universe came into being. [184] [185] The Rig Veda praises various deities, none superior nor inferior, in a henotheistic manner. [186] The hymns repeatedly refer to One Truth and Reality. The "One Truth" of Vedic literature, in modern era scholarship, has been interpreted as monotheism, monism, as well as a deified Hidden Principles behind the great happenings and processes of nature. [187]

Hindus believe that all living creatures have a soul. This soul – the spirit or true "self" of every person, is called the ātman . The soul is believed to be eternal. [188] According to the monistic/pantheistic (non-dualist) theologies of Hinduism (such as Advaita Vedanta school), this Atman is indistinct from Brahman, the supreme spirit. [189] The goal of life, according to the Advaita school, is to realise that one's soul is identical to supreme soul, that the supreme soul is present in everything and everyone, all life is interconnected and there is oneness in all life. [190] [191] [192] Dualistic schools (Dvaita and Bhakti) understand Brahman as a Supreme Being separate from individual souls. [193] They worship the Supreme Being variously as Vishnu, Brahma, Shiva, or Shakti, depending upon the sect. God is called Ishvara , Bhagavan , Parameshwara , Deva or Devi , and these terms have different meanings in different schools of Hinduism. [194] [195] [196]

Hindu texts accept a polytheistic framework, but this is generally conceptualized as the divine essence or luminosity that gives vitality and animation to the inanimate natural substances. [197] There is a divine in everything, human beings, animals, trees and rivers. It is observable in offerings to rivers, trees, tools of one's work, animals and birds, rising sun, friends and guests, teachers and parents. [197] [198] [199] It is the divine in these that makes each sacred and worthy of reverence. This seeing divinity in everything, state Buttimer and Wallin, makes the Vedic foundations of Hinduism quite distinct from Animism. [197] The animistic premise sees multiplicity, power differences and competition between man and man, man and animal, as well as man and nature. The Vedic view does not see this competition, rather sees a unifying divinity that connects everyone and everything. [197] [200] [201]

The Hindu scriptures name celestial entities called Devas (or Devī in feminine form), which may be translated into English as gods or heavenly beings. [note 20] The devas are an integral part of Hindu culture and are depicted in art, architecture and through icons, and stories about them are related in the scriptures, particularly in Indian epic poetry and the Puranas. They are, however, often distinguished from Ishvara, a personal god, with many Hindus worshipping Ishvara in one of its particular manifestations as their iṣṭa devatā , or chosen ideal. [202] [203] The choice is a matter of individual preference, [204] and of regional and family traditions. [204] [note 21] The multitude of Devas are considered as manifestations of Brahman. [206]

The word avatar does not appear in the Vedic literature, [207] but appears in verb forms in post-Vedic literature, and as a noun particularly in the Puranic literature after the 6th century CE. [208] Theologically, the reincarnation idea is most often associated with the avatars of Hindu god Vishnu, though the idea has been applied to other deities. [209] Varying lists of avatars of Vishnu appear in Hindu scriptures, including the ten Dashavatara of the Garuda Purana and the twenty-two avatars in the Bhagavata Purana , though the latter adds that the incarnations of Vishnu are innumerable. [210] The avatars of Vishnu are important in Vaishnavism theology. In the goddess-based Shaktism tradition, avatars of the Devi are found and all goddesses are considered to be different aspects of the same metaphysical Brahman [211] and Shakti (energy). [212] [213] While avatars of other deities such as Ganesha and Shiva are also mentioned in medieval Hindu texts, this is minor and occasional. [214]

Both theistic and atheistic ideas, for epistemological and metaphysical reasons, are profuse in different schools of Hinduism. The early Nyaya school of Hinduism, for example, was non-theist/atheist, [215] but later Nyaya school scholars argued that God exists and offered proofs using its theory of logic. [216] [217] Other schools disagreed with Nyaya scholars. Samkhya, [218] Mimamsa [219] and Carvaka schools of Hinduism, were non-theist/atheist, arguing that "God was an unnecessary metaphysical assumption". [web 13] [220] [221] Its Vaisheshika school started as another non-theistic tradition relying on naturalism and that all matter is eternal, but it later introduced the concept of a non-creator God. [222] [223] [224] The Yoga school of Hinduism accepted the concept of a "personal god" and left it to the Hindu to define his or her god. [225] Advaita Vedanta taught a monistic, abstract Self and Oneness in everything, with no room for gods or deity, a perspective that Mohanty calls, "spiritual, not religious". [226] Bhakti sub-schools of Vedanta taught a creator God that is distinct from each human being. [193]

According to Graham Schweig, Hinduism has the strongest presence of the divine feminine in world religion from ancient times to the present. [227] The goddess is viewed as the heart of the most esoteric Saiva traditions. [228]


Authority and eternal truths play an important role in Hinduism. [229] Religious traditions and truths are believed to be contained in its sacred texts, which are accessed and taught by sages, gurus, saints or avatars. [229] But there is also a strong tradition of the questioning of authority, internal debate and challenging of religious texts in Hinduism. The Hindus believe that this deepens the understanding of the eternal truths and further develops the tradition. Authority "was mediated through [...] an intellectual culture that tended to develop ideas collaboratively, and according to the shared logic of natural reason." [229] Narratives in the Upanishads present characters questioning persons of authority. [229] The Kena Upanishad repeatedly asks kena, 'by what' power something is the case. [229] The Katha Upanishad and Bhagavad Gita present narratives where the student criticizes the teacher's inferior answers. [229] In the Shiva Purana, Shiva questions Vishnu and Brahma. [229] Doubt plays a repeated role in the Mahabharata. [229] Jayadeva's Gita Govinda presents criticism via the character of Radha. [229]

Main traditions

A Ganesha-centric Panchayatana ("five deities", from the Smarta tradition): Ganesha (centre) with Shiva (top left), Parvati (top right), Vishnu (bottom left) and Surya (bottom right). All these deities also have separate sects dedicated to them. Ganesha pachayatana.jpg
A Ganesha-centric Panchayatana ("five deities", from the Smarta tradition): Ganesha (centre) with Shiva (top left), Parvati (top right), Vishnu (bottom left) and Surya (bottom right). All these deities also have separate sects dedicated to them.

Hinduism has no central doctrinal authority and many practising Hindus do not claim to belong to any particular denomination or tradition. [230] Four major denominations are, however, used in scholarly studies: Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism and Smartism. [231] [232] These denominations differ primarily in the central deity worshipped, the traditions and the soteriological outlook. [233] The denominations of Hinduism, states Lipner, are unlike those found in major religions of the world, because Hindu denominations are fuzzy with individuals practicing more than one, and he suggests the term "Hindu polycentrism". [234]

Vaishnavism is the devotional religious tradition that worships Vishnu [note 22] and his avatars, particularly Krishna and Rama. [236] The adherents of this sect are generally non-ascetic, monastic, oriented towards community events and devotionalism practices inspired by "intimate loving, joyous, playful" Krishna and other Vishnu avatars. [233] These practices sometimes include community dancing, singing of Kirtans and Bhajans, with sound and music believed by some to have meditative and spiritual powers. [237] Temple worship and festivals are typically elaborate in Vaishnavism. [238] The Bhagavad Gita and the Ramayana, along with Vishnu-oriented Puranas provide its theistic foundations. [239] Philosophically, their beliefs are rooted in the dualism sub-schools of Vedantic Hinduism. [240] [241]

Shaivism is the tradition that focuses on Shiva. Shaivas are more attracted to ascetic individualism, and it has several sub-schools. [233] Their practices include Bhakti-style devotionalism, yet their beliefs lean towards nondual, monistic schools of Hinduism such as Advaita and Raja Yoga. [231] [237] Some Shaivas worship in temples, while others emphasize yoga, striving to be one with Shiva within. [242] Avatars are uncommon, and some Shaivas visualize god as half male, half female, as a fusion of the male and female principles (Ardhanarishvara). Shaivism is related to Shaktism, wherein Shakti is seen as spouse of Shiva. [231] Community celebrations include festivals, and participation, with Vaishnavas, in pilgrimages such as the Kumbh Mela. [243] Shaivism has been more commonly practiced in the Himalayan north from Kashmir to Nepal, and in south India. [244]

Shaktism focuses on goddess worship of Shakti or Devi as cosmic mother, [233] and it is particularly common in northeastern and eastern states of India such as Assam and Bengal. Devi is depicted as in gentler forms like Parvati, the consort of Shiva; or, as fierce warrior goddesses like Kali and Durga. Followers of Shaktism recognize Shakti as the power that underlies the male principle. Shaktism is also associated with Tantra practices. [245] Community celebrations include festivals, some of which include processions and idol immersion into sea or other water bodies. [246]

Smartism centers its worship simultaneously on all the major Hindu deities: Shiva, Vishnu, Shakti, Ganesha, Surya and Skanda. [247] The Smarta tradition developed during the (early) Classical Period of Hinduism around the beginning of the Common Era, when Hinduism emerged from the interaction between Brahmanism and local traditions. [248] [249] The Smarta tradition is aligned with Advaita Vedanta, and regards Adi Shankara as its founder or reformer, who considered worship of God-with-attributes (Saguna Brahman) as a journey towards ultimately realizing God-without-attributes (nirguna Brahman, Atman, Self-knowledge). [250] [251] The term Smartism is derived from Smriti texts of Hinduism, meaning those who remember the traditions in the texts. [231] [252] This Hindu sect practices a philosophical Jnana yoga, scriptural studies, reflection, meditative path seeking an understanding of Self's oneness with God. [231] [253]

There are no census data available on demographic history or trends for the traditions within Hinduism. [254] Estimates vary on the relative number of adherents in the different traditions of Hinduism. According to a 2010 estimate by Johnson and Grim, the Vaishnavism tradition is the largest group with about 641 million or 67.6% of Hindus, followed by Shaivism with 252 million or 26.6%, Shaktism with 30 million or 3.2% and other traditions including Neo-Hinduism and Reform Hinduism with 25 million or 2.6%. [255] In contrast, according to Jones and Ryan, Shaivism is the largest tradition of Hinduism. [256]


The Rigveda is the first among four Vedas and is one of the oldest religious texts. This Rigveda manuscript is in Devanagari. Rigveda MS2097.jpg
The Rigveda is the first among four Vedas and is one of the oldest religious texts. This Rigveda manuscript is in Devanagari.

The ancient scriptures of Hinduism are in Sanskrit. These texts are classified into two: Shruti and Smriti. Shruti is apauruṣeyā , "not made of a man" but revealed to the rishis (seers), and regarded as having the highest authority, while the smriti are manmade and have secondary authority. [257] They are the two highest sources of dharma, the other two being Śiṣṭa Āchāra/Sadāchara (conduct of noble people) and finally Ātma tuṣṭi ("what is pleasing to oneself") [note 24]

Hindu scriptures were composed, memorized and transmitted verbally, across generations, for many centuries before they were written down. [258] [259] Over many centuries, sages refined the teachings and expanded the Shruti and Smriti, as well as developed Shastras with epistemological and metaphysical theories of six classical schools of Hinduism.

Shruti (lit. that which is heard) [260] primarily refers to the Vedas, which form the earliest record of the Hindu scriptures, and are regarded as eternal truths revealed to the ancient sages ( rishis ). [261] There are four Vedas Rigveda , Samaveda , Yajurveda and Atharvaveda . Each Veda has been subclassified into four major text types – the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and symbolic-sacrifices), the Brahmanas (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the Upanishads (text discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge). [262] [263] [264] The first two parts of the Vedas were subsequently called the Karmakāṇḍa (ritualistic portion), while the last two form the Jñānakāṇḍa (knowledge portion, discussing spiritual insight and philosophical teachings). [265] [266] [267] [268]

The Upanishads are the foundation of Hindu philosophical thought, and have profoundly influenced diverse traditions. [269] [270] [143] Of the Shrutis (Vedic corpus), they alone are widely influential among Hindus, considered scriptures par excellence of Hinduism, and their central ideas have continued to influence its thoughts and traditions. [269] [141] Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan states that the Upanishads have played a dominating role ever since their appearance. [271] There are 108 Muktikā Upanishads in Hinduism, of which between 10 and 13 are variously counted by scholars as Principal Upanishads. [268] [272] The most notable of the Smritis ("remembered") are the Hindu epics and the Puranas. The epics consist of the Mahabharata and the Ramayana. The Bhagavad Gita is an integral part of the Mahabharata and one of the most popular sacred texts of Hinduism. [273] It is sometimes called Gitopanishad, then placed in the Shruti ("heard") category, being Upanishadic in content. [274] The Puranas, which started to be composed from c. 300 CE onward, [275] contain extensive mythologies, and are central in the distribution of common themes of Hinduism through vivid narratives. The Yoga Sutras is a classical text for the Hindu Yoga tradition, which gained a renewed popularity in the 20th century. [276] Since the 19th-century Indian modernists have re-asserted the 'Aryan origins' of Hinduism, "purifying" Hinduism from its Tantric elements [83] and elevating the Vedic elements. Hindu modernists like Vivekananda see the Vedas as the laws of the spiritual world, which would still exist even if they were not revealed to the sages. [277] [278] In Tantric tradition, the Agamas refer to authoritative scriptures or the teachings of Shiva to Shakti, [279] while Nigamas refers to the Vedas and the teachings of Shakti to Shiva. [279] In Agamic schools of Hinduism, the Vedic literature and the Agamas are equally authoritative. [280] [281]



A wedding is the most extensive personal ritual an adult Hindu undertakes in his or her life. A typical Hindu wedding is solemnized before Vedic fire ritual (shown). (A) Hindu wedding, Saptapadi ritual before Agni Yajna.jpg
A wedding is the most extensive personal ritual an adult Hindu undertakes in his or her life. A typical Hindu wedding is solemnized before Vedic fire ritual (shown).

Most Hindus observe religious rituals at home. [283] The rituals vary greatly among regions, villages, and individuals. They are not mandatory in Hinduism. The nature and place of rituals is an individual's choice. Some devout Hindus perform daily rituals such as worshiping at dawn after bathing (usually at a family shrine, and typically includes lighting a lamp and offering foodstuffs before the images of deities), recitation from religious scripts, singing bhajans (devotional hymns), yoga, meditation, chanting mantras and others. [284]

Vedic rituals of fire-oblation ( yajna ) and chanting of Vedic hymns are observed on special occasions, such as a Hindu wedding. [285] Other major life-stage events, such as rituals after death, include the yajña and chanting of Vedic mantras. [web 15]

The words of the mantras are "themselves sacred," [286] and "do not constitute linguistic utterances." [287] Instead, as Klostermaier notes, in their application in Vedic rituals they become magical sounds, "means to an end." [note 25] In the Brahmanical perspective, the sounds have their own meaning, mantras are considered as "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer. [287] By reciting them the cosmos is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base. As long as the purity of the sounds is preserved, the recitation of the mantras will be efficacious, irrespective of whether their discursive meaning is understood by human beings." [287] [219]

Life-cycle rites of passage

Major life stage milestones are celebrated as sanskara (saṃskāra, rites of passage) in Hinduism. [288] [289] The rites of passage are not mandatory, and vary in details by gender, community and regionally. [290] Gautama Dharmasutras composed in about the middle of 1st millennium BCE lists 48 sanskaras, [291] while Gryhasutra and other texts composed centuries later list between 12 and 16 sanskaras. [288] [292] The list of sanskaras in Hinduism include both external rituals such as those marking a baby's birth and a baby's name giving ceremony, as well as inner rites of resolutions and ethics such as compassion towards all living beings and positive attitude. [291] The major traditional rites of passage in Hinduism include [290] Garbhadhana (pregnancy), Pumsavana (rite before the fetus begins moving and kicking in womb), Simantonnayana (parting of pregnant woman's hair, baby shower), Jatakarman (rite celebrating the new born baby), Namakarana (naming the child), Nishkramana (baby's first outing from home into the world), Annaprashana (baby's first feeding of solid food), Chudakarana (baby's first haircut, tonsure), Karnavedha (ear piercing), Vidyarambha (baby's start with knowledge), Upanayana (entry into a school rite), [293] [294] Keshanta and Ritusuddhi (first shave for boys, menarche for girls), Samavartana (graduation ceremony), Vivaha (wedding), Vratas (fasting, spiritual studies) and Antyeshti (cremation for an adult, burial for a child). [295] In contemporary times, there is regional variation among Hindus as to which of these sanskaras are observed; in some cases, additional regional rites of passage such as Śrāddha (ritual of feeding people after cremation) are practiced. [290] [296]

Bhakti (worship)

Vishu-kani 1.JPG
Kumuthavalli AvatharaAthalam.jpg
A home shrine with offerings at a regional Vishu festival (left); a priest in a temple (right).

Bhakti refers to devotion, participation in and the love of a personal god or a representational god by a devotee. [web 16] [297] Bhakti marga is considered in Hinduism as one of many possible paths of spirituality and alternative means to moksha. [298] The other paths, left to the choice of a Hindu, are Jnana marga (path of knowledge), Karma marga (path of works), Rāja marga (path of contemplation and meditation). [299] [300]

Bhakti is practiced in a number of ways, ranging from reciting mantras, japas (incantations), to individual private prayers within one's home shrine, [301] or in a temple or near a river bank, sometimes in the presence of an idol or image of a deity. [302] [303] Hindu temples and domestic altars, states Lynn Foulston, are important elements of worship in contemporary theistic Hinduism. [304] While many visit a temple on a special occasion, most offer a brief prayer on an everyday basis at the domestic altar. [304] This bhakti is expressed in a domestic shrine which typically is a dedicated part of the home and includes the images of deities or the gurus the Hindu chooses. [304] Among Vaishnavism sub-traditions such as Swaminarayan, the home shrines can be elaborate with either a room dedicated to it or a dedicated part of the kitchen. The devotee uses this space for daily prayers or meditation, either before breakfast or after day's work. [305] [306]

Bhakti is sometimes private inside household shrines and sometimes practiced as a community. It may include Puja, Aarti, [307] musical Kirtan or singing Bhajan, where devotional verses and hymns are read or poems are sung by a group of devotees. [web 17] [308] While the choice of the deity is at the discretion of the Hindu, the most observed traditions of Hindu devotion include Vaishnavism, Shaivism, and Shaktism. [309] A Hindu may worship multiple deities, all as henotheistic manifestations of the same ultimate reality, cosmic spirit and absolute spiritual concept called Brahman. [310] [311] [206] Bhakti marga, states Pechelis, is more than ritual devotionalism, it includes practices and spiritual activities aimed at refining one's state of mind, knowing god, participating in god, and internalizing god. [312] [313] While Bhakti practices are popular and easily observable aspect of Hinduism, not all Hindus practice Bhakti, or believe in god-with-attributes (saguna Brahman). [314] [315] Concurrent Hindu practices include a belief in god-without-attributes, and god within oneself. [316] [317]


The festival of lights, Diwali, is celebrated by Hindus all over the world. It is referred as Dipavali in the South India. Deepawali-festival.jpg
The festival of lights, Diwali, is celebrated by Hindus all over the world. It is referred as Dipavali in the South India.
Holi celebrated at the Sri Sri Radha Krishna Temple in Utah, United States. Holi Festival of Colors Utah, United States 2013.jpg
Holi celebrated at the Sri Sri Radha Krishna Temple in Utah, United States.

Hindu festivals (Sanskrit: Utsava; literally: "to lift higher") are ceremonies that weave individual and social life to dharma. [318] [319] Hinduism has many festivals throughout the year, where the dates are set by the lunisolar Hindu calendar, many coinciding with either the full moon (Holi) or the new moon (Diwali), often with seasonal changes. [320] Some festivals are found only regionally and they celebrate local traditions, while a few such as Holi and Diwali are pan-Hindu. [320] [321] The festivals typically celebrate events from Hinduism, connoting spiritual themes and celebrating aspects of human relationships such as the Sister-Brother bond over the Raksha Bandhan (or Bhai Dooj) festival. [319] [322] The same festival sometimes marks different stories depending on the Hindu denomination, and the celebrations incorporate regional themes, traditional agriculture, local arts, family get togethers, Puja rituals and feasts. [318] [323]

Some major regional or pan-Hindu festivals include:


Many adherents undertake pilgrimages, which have historically been an important part of Hinduism and remain so today. [324] Pilgrimage sites are called Tirtha , Kshetra, Gopitha or Mahalaya. [325] [326] The process or journey associated with Tirtha is called Tirtha-yatra. [327] According to the Hindu text Skanda Purana , Tirtha are of three kinds: Jangam Tirtha is to a place movable of a sadhu, a rishi, a guru; Sthawar Tirtha is to a place immovable, like Benaras, Haridwar, Mount Kailash, holy rivers; while Manas Tirtha is to a place of mind of truth, charity, patience, compassion, soft speech, soul. [328] [329] Tīrtha-yatra is, states Knut A. Jacobsen, anything that has a salvific value to a Hindu, and includes pilgrimage sites such as mountains or forests or seashore or rivers or ponds, as well as virtues, actions, studies or state of mind. [330] [331]

Pilgrimage sites of Hinduism are mentioned in the epic Mahabharata and the Puranas. [332] [333] Most Puranas include large sections on Tirtha Mahatmya along with tourist guides, [334] which describe sacred sites and places to visit. [335] [336] [337] In these texts, Varanasi (Benares, Kashi), Rameshwaram, Kanchipuram, Dwarka, Puri, Haridwar, Sri Rangam, Vrindavan, Ayodhya, Tirupati, Mayapur, Nathdwara, twelve Jyotirlinga and Shakti Peetha have been mentioned as particularly holy sites, along with geographies where major rivers meet (sangam) or join the sea. [338] [333] Kumbhamela is another major pilgrimage on the eve of the solar festival Makar Sankranti. This pilgrimage rotates at a gap of three years among four sites: Prayag Raj at the confluence of the Ganges and Yamuna rivers, Haridwar near source of the Ganges, Ujjain on the Shipra river and Nasik on the bank of the Godavari river. [339] This is one of world's largest mass pilgrimage, with an estimated 40 to 100 million people attending the event. [339] [340] [web 18] At this event, they say a prayer to the sun and bathe in the river, [339] a tradition attributed to Adi Shankara. [341]

Some pilgrimages are part of a Vrata (vow), which a Hindu may make for a number of reasons. [342] [343] It may mark a special occasion, such as the birth of a baby, or as part of a rite of passage such as a baby's first haircut, or after healing from a sickness. [344] [345] It may, states Eck, also be the result of prayers answered. [344] An alternative reason for Tirtha, for some Hindus, is to respect wishes or in memory of a beloved person after his or her death. [344] This may include dispersing their cremation ashes in a Tirtha region in a stream, river or sea to honor the wishes of the dead. The journey to a Tirtha, assert some Hindu texts, helps one overcome the sorrow of the loss. [344] [note 26]

Other reasons for a Tirtha in Hinduism is to rejuvenate or gain spiritual merit by traveling to famed temples or bathe in rivers such as the Ganges. [348] [349] [350] Tirtha has been one of the recommended means of addressing remorse and to perform penance, for unintentional errors and intentional sins, in the Hindu tradition. [351] [352] The proper procedure for a pilgrimage is widely discussed in Hindu texts. [353] The most accepted view is that the greatest austerity comes from traveling on foot, or part of the journey is on foot, and that the use of a conveyance is only acceptable if the pilgrimage is otherwise impossible. [354]

Person and society


Priests performing Kalyanam (marriage) of the holy deities at Bhadrachalam Temple, in Telangana. It is one of the temples in India, where Kalyanam is done everyday throughout the year. 12BCM11.jpg
Priests performing Kalyanam (marriage) of the holy deities at Bhadrachalam Temple, in Telangana. It is one of the temples in India, where Kalyanam is done everyday throughout the year.

Hindu society has been categorised into four classes, called varnas. They are the Brahmins : Vedic teachers and priests; the Kshatriyas : warriors and kings; the Vaishyas : farmers and merchants; and the Shudras : servants and labourers. [355] The Bhagavad Gītā links the varna to an individual's duty (svadharma), inborn nature (svabhāva), and natural tendencies ( guṇa ). [356] The Manusmṛiti categorises the different castes. [web 19] Some mobility and flexibility within the varnas challenge allegations of social discrimination in the caste system, as has been pointed out by several sociologists, [357] [358] although some other scholars disagree. [359] Scholars debate whether the so-called caste system is part of Hinduism sanctioned by the scriptures or social custom. [360] [web 20] [note 27] And various contemporary scholars have argued that the caste system was constructed by the British colonial regime. [361] A renunciant man of knowledge is usually called Varnatita or "beyond all varnas" in Vedantic works. The bhiksu is advised to not bother about the caste of the family from which he begs his food. Scholars like Adi Sankara affirm that not only is Brahman beyond all varnas, the man who is identified with Him also transcends the distinctions and limitations of caste. [362]


A statue of Shiva in yogic meditation Shiva Bangalore .jpg
A statue of Shiva in yogic meditation

In whatever way a Hindu defines the goal of life, there are several methods (yogas) that sages have taught for reaching that goal. Yoga is a Hindu discipline which trains the body, mind, and consciousness for health, tranquility, and spiritual insight. [363] Texts dedicated to Yoga include the Yoga Sutras , the Hatha Yoga Pradipika , the Bhagavad Gita and, as their philosophical and historical basis, the Upanishads. Yoga is means, and the four major marga (paths) of Hinduism are: Bhakti Yoga (the path of love and devotion), Karma Yoga (the path of right action), Rāja Yoga (the path of meditation), and Jñāna Yoga (the path of wisdom) [364] An individual may prefer one or some yogas over others, according to his or her inclination and understanding. Practice of one yoga does not exclude others. The modern practice of yoga as exercise has a contested relationship with Hinduism. [365]


Basic Hindu symbols: Shatkona, Padma, and Swastika. Three basic Hindu symbols.jpg
Basic Hindu symbols: Shatkona, Padma, and Swastika.
The Hindu deity Ganesha is sometimes linked to the symbol Om. Ganesha-aum.jpg
The Hindu deity Ganesha is sometimes linked to the symbol Om .

Hinduism has a developed system of symbolism and iconography to represent the sacred in art, architecture, literature and worship. These symbols gain their meaning from the scriptures or cultural traditions. The syllable Om (which represents the Brahman and Atman) has grown to represent Hinduism itself, while other markings such as the Swastika sign represent auspiciousness, [367] and Tilaka (literally, seed) on forehead – considered to be the location of spiritual third eye, [368] marks ceremonious welcome, blessing or one's participation in a ritual or rite of passage. [369] Elaborate Tilaka with lines may also identify a devotee of a particular denomination. Flowers, birds, animals, instruments, symmetric mandala drawings, objects, idols are all part of symbolic iconography in Hinduism. [370] [371]

Ahimsa, vegetarianism and other food customs

Hindus advocate the practice of ahiṃsā (nonviolence) and respect for all life because divinity is believed to permeate all beings, including plants and non-human animals. [372] The term ahiṃsā appears in the Upanishads, [373] the epic Mahabharata [374] and ahiṃsā is the first of the five Yamas (vows of self-restraint) in Patanjali's Yoga Sutras. [375]

A goshala or cow shelter at Guntur Gosala in Guntur, India.jpg
A goshala or cow shelter at Guntur

In accordance with ahiṃsā, many Hindus embrace vegetarianism to respect higher forms of life. Estimates of strict lacto vegetarians in India (includes adherents of all religions) who never eat any meat, fish or eggs vary between 20% and 42%, while others are either less strict vegetarians or non-vegetarians. [376] Those who eat meat seek Jhatka (quick death) method of meat production, and dislike Halal (slow bled death) method, believing that quick death method reduces suffering to the animal. [377] [378] The food habits vary with region, with Bengali Hindus and Hindus living in Himalayan regions, or river delta regions, regularly eating meat and fish. [379] Some avoid meat on specific festivals or occasions. [380] Observant Hindus who do eat meat almost always abstain from beef. The cow in Hindu society is traditionally identified as a caretaker and a maternal figure, [381] and Hindu society honours the cow as a symbol of unselfish giving. [382] There are many Hindu groups that have continued to abide by a strict vegetarian diet in modern times. Some adhere to a diet that is devoid of meat, eggs, and seafood. [383] Food affects body, mind and spirit in Hindu beliefs. [384] [385] Hindu texts such as Śāṇḍilya Upanishad [386] and Svātmārāma [387] [388] recommend Mitahara (eating in moderation) as one of the Yamas (virtuous self restraints). The Bhagavad Gita links body and mind to food one consumes in verses 17.8 through 17.10. [389]

Some Hindus such as those belonging to the Shaktism tradition, [390] and Hindus in regions such as Bali and Nepal [391] [392] practise animal sacrifice. [391] The sacrificed animal is eaten as ritual food. [393] In contrast, the Vaishnava Hindus abhor and vigorously oppose animal sacrifice. [394] [395] The principle of non-violence to animals has been so thoroughly adopted in Hinduism that animal sacrifice is uncommon [396] and historically reduced to a vestigial marginal practice. [397]


Kauai Hindu monastery in Kauai Island in Hawaii is the only Hindu Monastery in the North American continent Iraivan Temple.jpg
Kauai Hindu monastery in Kauai Island in Hawaii is the only Hindu Monastery in the North American continent


A Hindu temple is a house of god(s). [398] It is a space and structure designed to bring human beings and gods together, infused with symbolism to express the ideas and beliefs of Hinduism. [399] A temple incorporates all elements of Hindu cosmology, the highest spire or dome representing Mount Meru – reminder of the abode of Brahma and the center of spiritual universe, [400] the carvings and iconography symbolically presenting dharma, kama, artha, moksha and karma. [401] [402] The layout, the motifs, the plan and the building process recite ancient rituals, geometric symbolisms, and reflect beliefs and values innate within various schools of Hinduism. [399] Hindu temples are spiritual destinations for many Hindus (not all), as well as landmarks for arts, annual festivals, rite of passage rituals, and community celebrations. [403] [404]

Illustration of Hindu temples in Asia
Besakih Bali Indonesia Pura-Besakih-02.jpg
New Delhi Temple.jpg

Hindu temples come in many styles, diverse locations, deploy different construction methods and are adapted to different deities and regional beliefs. [405] Two major styles of Hindu temples include the Gopuram style found in south India, and Nagara style found in north India. [web 22] [web 23] Other styles include cave, forest and mountain temples. [406] Yet, despite their differences, almost all Hindu temples share certain common architectural principles, core ideas, symbolism and themes. [399] Many temples feature one or more idols (murtis). The idol and Grabhgriya in the Brahma-pada (the center of the temple), under the main spire, serves as a focal point (darsana, a sight) in a Hindu temple. [407] In larger temples, the central space typically is surrounded by an ambulatory for the devotee to walk around and ritually circumambulate the Purusa (Brahman), the universal essence. [399]


Traditionally the life of a Hindu is divided into four Āśramas (phases or life stages; another meaning includes monastery). [408] The four ashramas are: Brahmacharya (student), Grihastha (householder), Vanaprastha (retired) and Sannyasa (renunciation). [409] Brahmacharya represents the bachelor student stage of life. Grihastha refers to the individual's married life, with the duties of maintaining a household, raising a family, educating one's children, and leading a family-centred and a dharmic social life. [409] Grihastha stage starts with Hindu wedding, and has been considered as the most important of all stages in sociological context, as Hindus in this stage not only pursued a virtuous life, they produced food and wealth that sustained people in other stages of life, as well as the offsprings that continued mankind. [410] Vanaprastha is the retirement stage, where a person hands over household responsibilities to the next generation, took an advisory role, and gradually withdrew from the world. [411] [412] The Sannyasa stage marks renunciation and a state of disinterest and detachment from material life, generally without any meaningful property or home (ascetic state), and focused on Moksha, peace and simple spiritual life. [413] [414] The Ashramas system has been one facet of the Dharma concept in Hinduism. [410] Combined with four proper goals of human life (Purusartha), the Ashramas system traditionally aimed at providing a Hindu with fulfilling life and spiritual liberation. [410] While these stages are typically sequential, any person can enter Sannyasa (ascetic) stage and become an Ascetic at any time after the Brahmacharya stage. [415] Sannyasa is not religiously mandatory in Hinduism, and elderly people are free to live with their families. [416]


A sadhu in Madurai, India Indian sadhu performing namaste.jpg
A sadhu in Madurai, India

Some Hindus choose to live a monastic life (Sannyāsa) in pursuit of liberation (moksha) or another form of spiritual perfection. [18] Monastics commit themselves to a simple and celibate life, detached from material pursuits, of meditation and spiritual contemplation. [417] A Hindu monk is called a Sanyāsī , Sādhu, or Swāmi. A female renunciate is called a Sanyāsini. Renunciates receive high respect in Hindu society because of their simple ahimsa-driven lifestyle and dedication to spiritual liberation (moksha) – believed to be the ultimate goal of life in Hinduism. [414] Some monastics live in monasteries, while others wander from place to place, depending on donated food and charity for their needs. [418]


The Hindu Shore Temple at Mahabalipuram was built by Narasimhavarman II. Shore temple, mahabalipuram.jpg
The Hindu Shore Temple at Mahabalipuram was built by Narasimhavarman II.

Hinduism 's varied history [17] overlaps or coincides with the development of religion in the Indian subcontinent since the Iron Age, with some of its traditions tracing back to prehistoric religions such as those of the Bronze Age Indus Valley Civilization. It has thus been called the "oldest religion" in the world. [note 28] Scholars regard Hinduism as a synthesis [420] [28] of various Indian cultures and traditions, [28] [105] [420] with diverse roots [26] and no single founder. [421] [note 29]

The history of Hinduism is often divided into periods of development. The first period is the pre-Vedic period, which includes the Indus Valley Civilization and local pre-historic religions, ending at about 1750 BCE. This period was followed in northern India by the Vedic period, which saw the introduction of the historical Vedic religion with the Indo-Aryan migrations, starting somewhere between 1900 BCE to 1400 BCE. [426] [note 30] The subsequent period, between 800 BCE and 200 BCE, is "a turning point between the Vedic religion and Hindu religions", [429] and a formative period for Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism. The Epic and Early Puranic period, from c. 200 BCE to 500 CE, saw the classical "Golden Age" of Hinduism (c. 320-650 CE), which coincides with the Gupta Empire. In this period the six branches of Hindu philosophy evolved, namely Samkhya, Yoga, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Mīmāṃsā, and Vedanta. Monotheistic sects like Shaivism and Vaishnavism developed during this same period through the Bhakti movement. The period from roughly 650 to 1100 CE forms the late Classical period [12] or early Middle Ages, in which classical Puranic Hinduism is established, and Adi Shankara's influential consolidation of Advaita Vedanta.

Hinduism under both Hindu and Islamic rulers from c. 1200 to 1750 CE, [430] [431] saw the increasing prominence of the Bhakti movement, which remains influential today. The colonial period saw the emergence of various Hindu reform movements partly inspired by western movements, such as Unitarianism and Theosophy. The Partition of India in 1947 was along religious lines, with the Republic of India emerging with a Hindu majority. During the 20th century, due to the Indian diaspora, Hindu minorities have formed in all continents, with the largest communities in absolute numbers in the United States and the United Kingdom.


Hinduism - Percentage by country Hinduism percent population in each nation World Map Hindu data by Pew Research.svg
Hinduism – Percentage by country

Hinduism is a major religion in India. Hinduism was followed by around 79.8% of the country's population of 1.21 billion (2011 census) (960 million adherents). [web 24] Other significant populations are found in Nepal (23 million), Bangladesh (15 million) and the Indonesian island of Bali (3.9 million). [432] The majority of the Vietnamese Cham people also follow Hinduism, with the largest proportion in Ninh Thuận Province. [web 25]

Countries with the greatest proportion of Hindus:

  1. Flag of Nepal.svg    Nepal 81.3% [web 26]
  2. Flag of India.svg  India 79.8% [web 27]
  3. Flag of Mauritius.svg  Mauritius 48.5% [web 28]
  4. Flag of Guyana.svg  Guyana 28.4% [web 29]
  5. Flag of Fiji.svg  Fiji 27.9% [web 30]
  6. Flag of Bhutan.svg  Bhutan 22.6% [web 31]
  7. Flag of Suriname.svg  Suriname 22.3% [web 32]
  8. Flag of Trinidad and Tobago.svg  Trinidad and Tobago 18.2% [web 33]
  9. Flag of Qatar.svg  Qatar 13.8%
  10. Flag of Sri Lanka.svg  Sri Lanka 12.6% [web 34]
  11. Flag of Bahrain.svg  Bahrain 9.8%
  12. Flag of Bangladesh.svg  Bangladesh 8.5% [web 35]
  13. Flag of France.svg  Réunion 6.7%
  14. Flag of the United Arab Emirates.svg  United Arab Emirates 6.6%
  15. Flag of Malaysia.svg  Malaysia 6.3% [web 36]
  16. Flag of Kuwait.svg  Kuwait 6%
  17. Flag of Oman.svg  Oman 5.5%
  18. Flag of Singapore.svg  Singapore 5% [web 37]
    Thaipusam procession in Singapore A day of devotion - Thaipusam in Singapore (4316108409).jpg
    Thaipusam procession in Singapore
  19. Flag of New Zealand.svg  New Zealand 2.62% [web 38]
  20. Flag of the Seychelles.svg  Seychelles 2.4% [web 39]

Demographically, Hinduism is the world's third largest religion, after Christianity and Islam. [web 40] [433]

Demographics of major traditions within Hinduism (World Religion Database, 2012 data) [434]
TraditionFollowers% of the Hindu population% of the world populationFollower dynamicsWorld dynamics
Vaishnavism 640,806,84567.69.3Increase2.svg GrowingDecrease2.svg Declining
Shaivism 252,200,00026.63.7Increase2.svg GrowingIncrease2.svg Growing
Shaktism 30,000,0003.20.4Steady2.svg StableDecrease2.svg Declining
Neo-Hinduism 20,300,0002.10.3Increase2.svg GrowingIncrease2.svg Growing
Reform Hinduism 5,200,0000.50.1Increase2.svg GrowingIncrease2.svg Growing
Cumulative948,575,00010013.8Increase2.svg GrowingIncrease2.svg Growing

Conversion debate

In the modern era, religious conversion from and to Hinduism has been a controversial subject. Some state the concept of missionary conversion, either way, is anathema to the precepts of Hinduism. [435]

Religious conversion to Hinduism has a long history outside India. Merchants and traders of India, particularly from the Indian peninsula, carried their religious ideas, which led to religious conversions to Hinduism in southeast Asia. [436] [437] [438] Within India, archeological and textual evidence such as the 2nd-century BCE Heliodorus pillar suggest that Greeks and other foreigners converted to Hinduism. [439] [440] The debate on proselytization and religious conversion between Christianity, Islam and Hinduism is more recent, and started in the 19th century. [441] [442] [note 31]

Religious leaders of some Hindu reform movements such as the Arya Samaj launched Shuddhi movement to proselytize and reconvert Muslims and Christians back to Hinduism, [446] [447] while those such as the Brahmo Samaj suggested Hinduism to be a non-missionary religion. [435] All these sects of Hinduism have welcomed new members to their group, while other leaders of Hinduism's diverse schools have stated that given the intensive proselytization activities from missionary Islam and Christianity, this "there is no such thing as proselytism in Hinduism" view must be re-examined. [435] [446] [448]

The appropriateness of conversion from major religions to Hinduism, and vice versa, has been and remains an actively debated topic in India, [449] [450] [451] and in Indonesia. [452]

See also


Related systems and religions


  1. 1 2 Hinduism is variously defined as a "religion", "set of religious beliefs and practices", "religious tradition", "a way of life" (Sharma 2003, pp. 12–13) etc. For a discussion on the topic, see: "Establishing the boundaries" in Flood 2008, pp. 1–17
  2. There is no single-word translation for dharma in Western languages.(Widgery 1930)(Rocher 2003)
    The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions, Dharma, defines dharma as follows: "the order and custom which make life and a universe possible, and thus to the behaviours appropriate to the maintenance of that order." See Dharma (righteousness, ethics).
  3. See:
    • Fowler 1997, p. 1: "probably the oldest religion in the world."
    • Klostermaier 2007, p. 1: The "oldest living major religion" in the world.
    • Kurien 2006: "There are almost a billion Hindus living on Earth. They practice the world's oldest religion..."
    • Bakker 1997: "it [Hinduism] is the oldest religion".
    • Noble 1998: "Hinduism, the world's oldest surviving religion, continues to provide the framework for daily life in much of South Asia."
    Smart 1993, p. 1, on the other hand, calls it also one of the youngest religions: "Hinduism could be seen to be much more recent, though with various ancient roots: in a sense it was formed in the late 19th Century and early 20th Century."
    Animism has also been called "the oldest religion."(Sponsel 2012: "Animism is by far the oldest religion in the world. Its antiquity seems to go back at least as far as the period of the Neanderthals some 60,000 to 80,000 years ago.")
    Australian linguist, R. M. W. Dixon discovered that Aboriginal myths regarding the origin of the Crater Lakes might be dated as accurate back to 10,000 years ago.(Dixon 1996)
    See also:
  4. Knott 1998, p. 5: "Many describe Hinduism as sanatana dharma, the eternal tradition or religion. This refers to the idea that its origins lie beyond human history."
  5. 1 2 Lockard 2007, p. 50: "The encounters that resulted from Aryan migration brought together several very different peoples and cultures, reconfiguring Indian society. Over many centuries a fusion of Aryan and Dravidian occurred, a complex process that historians have labeled the Indo-Aryan synthesis."
    Lockard 2007, p. 52: "Hinduism can be seen historically as a synthesis of Aryan beliefs with Harappan and other Dravidian traditions that developed over many centuries."
  6. 1 2 Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 12: "A period of consolidation, sometimes identified as one of 'Hindu synthesis', 'Brahmanic synthesis', or 'orthodox synthesis', takes place between the time of the late Vedic Upanishads (c. 500 BCE) and the period of Gupta imperial ascendency (c. 320–467 CE)."
  7. See:
    • Samuel 2008, p. 194: "The Brahmanical pattern"
    • Flood 1996, p. 16: "The tradition of brahmanical orthopraxy has played the role of 'master narrative'"
    • Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 12: "Brahmanical synthesis"
    According to Heesterman 2005, Brahmanism developed out of the Historical Vedic religion; "It is loosely known as Brahmanism because of the religious and legal importance it places on the brāhmaṇa (priestly) class of society." According to Witzel 1995, this development started around 1000 BCE in the Kuru Kingdom, with the Brahmins providing elaborate rituals to enhance the status of the Kuru kings.
  8. 1 2 Among its roots are the Vedic religion of the late Vedic period (Flood 1996, p. 16) and its emphasis on the status of Brahmans (Samuel 2008, pp. 48–53), but also the religions of the Indus Valley Civilisation (Narayanan 2009, p. 11; Lockard 2007, p. 52; Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 3; Jones & Ryan 2006, p. xviii) the Sramana or renouncer traditions of north-east India (Flood 1996, p. 16; Gomez 2013, p. 42), with possible roots in a non-Vedic Indo-Aryan culture (Bronkhorst 2007); and "popular or local traditions" (Flood 1996, p. 16) and prehistoric cultures "that thrived in South Asia long before the creation of textual evidence that we can decipher with any confidence", such as evidenced in the Bhimbetka Mesolithic cave paintings, from ca. 30,000 BCE.(Doniger 2010, p. 66) [subnote 1]
  9. The Indo-Aryan word Sindhu means "river", "ocean". [36] It is frequently being used in the Rigveda. The Sindhu-area is part of Āryāvarta, "the land of the Aryans".
  10. There are several views on the earliest mention of 'Hindu' in the context of religion:
    • Flood 1996, p. 6 states: "In Arabic texts, Al-Hind is a term used for the people of modern-day India and 'Hindu', or 'Hindoo', was used towards the end of the eighteenth century by the British to refer to the people of 'Hindustan', the people of northwest India. Eventually 'Hindu' became virtually equivalent to an 'Indian' who was not a Muslim, Sikh, Jain, or Christian, thereby encompassing a range of religious beliefs and practices. The '-ism' was added to Hindu in around 1830 to denote the culture and religion of the high-caste Brahmans in contrast to other religions, and the term was soon appropriated by Indians themselves in the context of building a national identity opposed to colonialism, though the term 'Hindu' was used in Sanskrit and Bengali hagiographic texts in contrast to 'Yavana' or Muslim as early as the sixteenth century."
    • Sharma 2002 and other scholars state that the 7th-century Chinese scholar Xuanzang, whose 17-year travel to India and interactions with its people and religions were recorded and preserved in the Chinese language, uses the transliterated term In-tu whose "connotation overflows in the religious".(Sharma 2002) Xuanzang describes Hindu Deva-temples of the early 7th century CE, worship of Sun deity and Shiva, his debates with scholars of Samkhya and Vaisheshika schools of Hindu philosophies, monks and monasteries of Hindus, Jains and Buddhists (both Mahayana and Theravada), and the study of the Vedas along with Buddhist texts at Nalanda.(Gosch & Stearns 2007, pp. 88–99)(Sharma 2011, pp. 5–12)(Smith et al. 2012, pp. 321–324)
    • Sharma 2002 also mentions the use of the word Hindu in Islamic texts such those relating to 8th-century Arab invasion of Sindh by Muhammad ibn Qasim, Al Biruni's 11th-century text Tarikh Al-Hind, and those of the Delhi Sultanate period, where the term Hindu retains the ambiguities of including all non-Islamic people such as Buddhists and of being "a region or a religion".
    • Lorenzen 2006 states, citing Richard Eaton: "one of the earliest occurrences of the word 'Hindu' in Islamic literature appears in 'Abd al-Malik Isami's Persian work, Futuhu's-salatin, composed in the Deccan in 1350. In this text, 'Isami uses the word 'hindi' to mean Indian in the ethno-geographical sense and the word 'hindu' to mean 'Hindu' in the sense of a follower of the Hindu religion".(Lorenzen 2006, p. 33)
    • Lorenzen 2006, pp. 32–33 also mentions other non-Persian texts such as Prithvíráj Ráso by ~12th century Canda Baradai, and epigraphical inscription evidence from Andhra Pradesh kingdoms who battled military expansion of Muslim dynasties in the 14th century, where the word 'Hindu' partly implies a religious identity in contrast to 'Turks' or Islamic religious identity.
    • Lorenzen 2006, p. 15 states that one of the earliest uses of word 'Hindu' in religious context, in a European language (Spanish), was the publication in 1649 by Sebastiao Manrique.
  11. In ancient literature the name Bharata or Bharata Vrasa was being used. [48]
  12. Sweetman mentions:
  13. See Rajiv Malhotra and Being Different for a critic who gained widespread attention outside the academia, Invading the Sacred, and Hindu studies.
  14. The term sanatana dharma and its Vedic roots had another context in the colonial era, particularly the early 19th-century through movements such as the Brahmo Samaj and the Arya Samaj. These movements, particularly active in British and French colonies outside India, such as in Africa and the Caribbean, interpreted Hinduism to be a monotheistic religion and attempted to demonstrate that it to be similar to Christianity and Islam. Their views were opposed by other Hindus such as the Sanatan Dharma Sabha of 1895. [78]
  15. Lipner quotes Brockington (1981), The sacred tread, p.5.
  16. Hinduism is derived from Perian hindu- and the -ism suffix. It is first recorded in 1786, in the generic sense of "polytheism of India". [web 8]
  17. Pennington [130] describes the circumstances in which early impressions of Hinduism were reported by colonial era missionaries: "Missionary reports from India also reflected the experience of foreigners in a land whose native inhabitants and British rulers often resented their presence. Their accounts of Hinduism were forged in physically, politically and spiritually hostile surroundings [impoverished, famine prone Bengal – now West Bengal and Bangladesh]. Plagued with anxieties and fears about their own health, regularly reminded of colleagues who had lost their lives or reason, uncertain of their own social location, and preaching to crowds whose reactions ranged from indifference to amusement to hostility, missionaries found expression for their darker misgivings in their production of what is surely part of their speckled legacy: a fabricated Hinduism crazed by blood-lust and devoted to the service of devils."
  18. Sweetman identifies several areas in which "there is substantial, if not universal, an agreement that colonialism influenced the study of Hinduism, even if the degree of this influence is debated": [132]
    • The wish of European Orientalists "to establish a textual basis for Hinduism", akin to the Protestant culture, [132] which was also driven by preference among the colonial powers for "written authority" rather than "oral authority". [132]
    • The influence of Brahmins on European conceptions of Hinduism. [132]
    • [T]he identification of Vedanta, more specifically Advaita Vedanta, as 'the paradigmatic example of the mystical nature of the Hindu religion'. [132] [subnote 2] Several factors led to the favouring of Vedanta as the "central philosophy of the Hindus": [133]
      • According to Niranjan Dhar's theory that Vedanta was favored because British feared French influence, especially the impact of the French Revolution; and Ronald Inden's theory that Advaita Vedanta was portrayed as 'illusionist pantheism' reinforcing the colonial stereotypical construction of Hinduism as indifferent to ethics and life-negating. [133]
      • "The amenability of Vedantic thought to both Christian and Hindu critics of 'idolatry' in other forms of Hinduism". [134]
    • The colonial constructions of caste as being part of Hinduism. [135] According to Nicholas Dirks' theory that, "Caste was refigured as a religious system, organising society in a context where politics and religion had never before been distinct domains of social action. [subnote 3]
    • "[T]he construction of Hinduism in the image of Christianity" [136]
    • Anti-colonial Hindus [137] "looking toward the systematisation of disparate practices as a means of recovering a pre-colonial, national identity". [136] [subnote 4]
  19. Many scholars have presented pre-colonial common denominators and asserted the importance of ancient Hindu textual sources in medieval and pre-colonial times:
    • Klaus Witz [139] states that Hindu Bhakti movement ideas in the medieval era grew on the foundation of Upanishadic knowledge and Vedanta philosophies.
    • John Henderson [140] states that "Hindus, both in medieval and in modern times, have been particularly drawn to those canonical texts and philosophical schools such as the Bhagavad Gita and Vedanta, which seem to synthesize or reconcile most successfully diverse philosophical teachings and sectarian points of view. Thus, this widely recognized attribute of Indian culture may be traced to the exegetical orientation of medieval Hindu commentarial traditions, especially Vedanta.
    • Patrick Olivelle [141] and others [142] [143] [144] state that the central ideas of the Upanishads in the Vedic corpus are at the spiritual core of Hindus.
  20. For translation of deva in singular noun form as "a deity, god", and in plural form as "the gods" or "the heavenly or shining ones", see: Monier-Williams 2001, p. 492. For translation of devatā as "godhead, divinity", see: Monier-Williams 2001, p. 495.
  21. Among some regional Hindus, such as Rajputs, these are called Kuldevis or Kuldevata. [205]
  22. sometimes with Lakshmi, the spouse of Vishnu; or, as Narayana and Sri; [235]
  23. Rigveda is not only the oldest among the vedas, but is one of the earliest Indo-European texts.
  24. According to Bhavishya Purana, Brahmaparva, Adhyaya 7, there are four sources of dharma: Śruti (Vedas), Smṛti (Dharmaśāstras, Puranas), Śiṣṭa Āchāra/Sadāchara (conduct of noble people) and finally Ātma tuṣṭi (self satisfaction). From the sloka:
    वेदः स्मृतिः सदाचारः स्वस्य च प्रियमात्मनः । एतच्चतुर्विधं प्राहुः साक्षाद्धर्मस्य लक्षणम् ॥ [web 14]
    vedaḥ smṛtiḥ sadācāraḥ svasya ca priyamātmanah
    etaccaturvidham prāhuḥ sākshāddharmasya lakshaṇam
    – Bhavishya Purāṇa, Brahmaparva, Adhyāya 7
    The meaning is vedas, smritis, good (approved) tradition and what is agreeable to one's soul (conscience), the wise have declared to be the four direct evidences of dharma.
  25. Klostermaier: "Brahman, derived from the root bŗh = to grow, to become great, was originally identical with the Vedic word, that makes people prosper: words were the pricipan means to approach the gods who dwelled in a different sphere. It was not a big step from this notion of "reified speech-act" to that "of the speech-act being looked at implicitly and explicitly as a means to an end." Klostermaier 2007, p. 55 quotes Madhav M. Deshpande (1990), Changing Conceptions of the Veda: From Speech-Acts to Magical Sounds, p.4.
  26. The cremation ashes are called phool (flowers). These are collected from the pyre in a rite-of-passage called asthi sanchayana, then dispersed during asthi visarjana. This signifies redemption of the dead in waters considered to be sacred and a closure for the living. Tirtha locations offer these services. [346] [347]
  27. Venkataraman and Deshpande: "Caste-based discrimination does exist in many parts of India today.... Caste-based discrimination fundamentally contradicts the essential teaching of Hindu sacred texts that divinity is inherent in all beings." [web 21]
  28. For instance Fowler: "probably the oldest religion in the world" [419]
  29. Among its roots are the Vedic religion [105] of the late Vedic period and its emphasis on the status of Brahmans, [422] but also the religions of the Indus Valley Civilisation, [26] [423] [424] the Sramana [425] or renouncer traditions [105] of east India, [425] and "popular or local traditions". [105]
  30. There is no exact dating possible for the beginning of the Vedic period. Witzel mentions a range between 1900 and 1400 BCE. [427] Flood mentions 1500 BCE. [428]
  31. The controversy started as an intense polemic battle between Christian missionaries and Muslim organizations in the first half of the 19th century, where missionaries such as Karl Gottlieb Pfander tried to convert Muslims and Hindus, by criticizing Qur'an and Hindu scriptures. [442] [443] [444] [445] Muslim leaders responded by publishing in Muslim-owned newspapers of Bengal, and through rural campaign, polemics against Christians and Hindus, and by launching "purification and reform movements" within Islam. [441] [442] Hindu leaders joined the proselytization debate, criticized Christianity and Islam, and asserted Hinduism to be a universal, secular religion. [441] [446]


  1. Doniger 2010, p. 66: "Much of what we now call Hinduism may have had roots in cultures that thrived in South Asia long before the creation of textual evidence that we can decipher with any confidence. Remarkable cave paintings have been preserved from Mesolithic sites dating from c. 30,000 BCE in Bhimbetka, near present-day Bhopal, in the Vindhya Mountains in the province of Madhya Pradesh." (NB: the generally accepted dating of the cave paintings is 8,000 BCE.)
  2. Sweetman cites Richard King (1999) p. 128.
  3. Sweetman cites Dirks (2001), Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India, Princeton University Press, p. xxvii
  4. Sweetman cites Viswanathan (2003), Colonialism and the Construction of Hinduism, p. 26

Related Research Articles

Indian religions Religions that originated in the Indian subcontinent

Indian religions, sometimes also termed Dharmic religions or Indic religions, are the religions that originated in the Indian subcontinent; namely Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, and Sikhism. These religions are also all classified as Eastern religions. Although Indian religions are connected through the history of India, they constitute a wide range of religious communities, and are not confined to the Indian subcontinent.

Upanishads Ancient Sanskrit religious and philosophical texts of Hinduism

The Upanishads are late Vedic Sanskrit texts of religious teaching and ideas still revered in Hinduism. They are the most recent part of the oldest scriptures of Hinduism, the Vedas, that deal with meditation, philosophy, and ontological knowledge; other parts of the Vedas deal with mantras, benedictions, rituals, ceremonies, and sacrifices. Among the most important literature in the history of Indian religions and culture, the Upanishads played an important role in the development of spiritual ideas in ancient India, marking a transition from Vedic ritualism to new ideas and institutions. Of all Vedic literature, the Upanishads alone are widely known, and their central ideas are at the spiritual core of Hinduism.

Outline of Hinduism Overview of and topical guide to Hinduism

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to Hinduism:

Ātman is a Sanskrit word that means inner self, spirit, or soul. In Hindu philosophy, especially in the Vedanta school of Hinduism, Ātman is the first principle: the true self of an individual beyond identification with phenomena, the essence of an individual. In order to attain Moksha (liberation), a human being must acquire self-knowledge. For the different schools of thought, self-realization is that one's true self (Jīvātman) and the ultimate reality (Brahman) are: completely identical, completely different, or simultaneously non-different and different.

<i>Moksha</i> Spiritual liberation, soteriological goal in Hinduism

Moksha, also called vimoksha, vimukti and mukti, is a term in Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism for various forms of emancipation, enlightenment, liberation, and release. In its soteriological and eschatological senses, it refers to freedom from saṃsāra, the cycle of death and rebirth. In its epistemological and psychological senses, moksha is freedom from ignorance: self-realization, self-actualization and self-knowledge.

Adi Shankara Hindu philosopher and theologian

Adi Shankaracharya was an Indian philosopher and theologian who consolidated the doctrine of Advaita Vedanta. He is credited with unifying and establishing the main currents of thought in Hinduism.

Historical Vedic religion Religious ideas and practices among most Indo-Aryan-speaking peoples of ancient India after about 1500 BCE

The historical Vedic religion, and subsequent Brahmanism, constituted the religious ideas and practices among some of the Indo-Aryan peoples of northwest India and the western Ganges plain of ancient India during the Vedic period. These ideas and practices are found in the Vedic texts.

Vedanta or Uttara Mīmāṃsā is one of the six (āstika) schools of Hindu philosophy. Literally meaning "end of the Vedas", Vedanta reflects ideas that emerged from, or were aligned with, the speculations and philosophies contained in the Upanishads, specifically, knowledge and liberation. Vedanta contains many sub-traditions, ranging from Vishnu-oriented dualism, bhedabheda and qualified non-dualism, to non-Vaishna monistic non-dualism, all of which refer to the basis of a common textual connection called the Prasthanatrayi: the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras and the Bhagavad Gita.

Yajnavalkya or Yagyavlkya was a Hindu Vedic sage. He is mentioned in the Upanishads, and likely lived in the Videha region of ancient India, approximately between the 8th century BCE, and the 7th century BCE. Yajnavalkya is considered one of the earliest philosophers in recorded history. Yajnavalkya proposes and debates metaphysical questions about the nature of existence, consciousness and impermanence, and expounds the epistemic doctrine of neti neti to discover the universal Self and Ātman. His ideas for renunciation of worldly attachments have been important to Hindu sannyasa traditions.

Advaita Vedanta School of Hindu philosophy, a classic path to spiritual realization

Advaita Vedānta is a school of Hindu philosophy, and is a classic system of spiritual realization in Indian tradition. The term Advaita refers to the idea that Brahman alone is ultimately real, the phenomenal transient world is an illusory appearance (maya) of Brahman, and the true self, atman, is not different from Brahman.

Hindu philosophy

Hindu philosophy encompasses the philosophies, world views and teachings that emerged in ancient India. These include six systems (shad-darśana) – Sankhya, Yoga, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Mimamsa and Vedanta.

Brahmacharya is a concept within Indian religions that literally means "conduct consistent with Brahman" or "on the path of Brahman". In Yoga, Hinduism and Buddhism it generally refers to a lifestyle characterized by sexual continence or abstinence.

Jnana yoga One of four spiritual paths in Hinduism

Jñāna yoga, also known as Jnanamarga, is one of the several spiritual paths in Hinduism, which emphasizes the "path of knowledge", also known as the "path of self-realization". It is one of the three classical paths (margas) for moksha. The other two are karma yoga and bhakti yoga. Later, new movements within Hinduism added raja yoga as a fourth spiritual path, but it is not universally accepted as distinct from the other three.

Vedas Ancient scriptures of Hinduism

The Vedas are a large body of religious texts originating in ancient India. Composed in Vedic Sanskrit, the texts constitute the oldest layer of Sanskrit literature and the oldest scriptures of Hinduism.

Smarta tradition Tradition in Hinduism linked to Advaita Vedanta

Smarta tradition (स्मार्त) is a movement in Hinduism that developed during its classical period around the beginning of the Common Era. It reflects a Hindu synthesis of four philosophical strands: Mimamsa, Advaita, Yoga, and theism. The Smarta tradition rejects theistic sectarianism, and it is notable for the domestic worship of five shrines with five deities, all treated as equal – Shiva, Vishnu, Surya, Ganesha, and Shakti. The Smarta tradition contrasted with the older Shrauta tradition, which was based on elaborate rituals and rites. There has been considerable overlap in the ideas and practices of the Smarta tradition with other significant historic movements within Hinduism, namely Shaivism, Brahmanism, Vaishnavism, and Shaktism.

<i>Dhyāna</i> in Hinduism

Dhyāna in Hinduism means contemplation and meditation. Dhyāna is taken up in Yoga exercises, and is a means to samadhi and self-knowledge.

The concept of God in Hinduism varies in its diverse traditions. Hinduism spans a wide range of beliefs such as henotheism, monotheism, polytheism, panentheism, pantheism, pandeism, monism, atheism and nontheism.

Para Brahman in Hindu philosophy is the "Supreme Brahman" that which is beyond all descriptions and conceptualisations. It is described as the formless that eternally pervades everything, everywhere in the universe and whatever is beyond.

<i>Brahman</i> Metaphysical concept, unchanging Ultimate Reality in Hinduism

Brahman, connotes the highest Universal Principle, the Ultimate Reality in the universe. In major schools of Hindu philosophy, it is the material, efficient, formal and final cause of all that exists. It is the pervasive, infinite, eternal truth and bliss which does not change, yet is the cause of all changes. Brahman as a metaphysical concept refers to the single binding unity behind diversity in all that exists in the universe.

Hindu denominations are traditions within Hinduism centered on one or more gods or goddesses, such as Vishnu, Shiva, Shakti and Brahma. Sometimes the term is used for sampradayas led by a particular guru with a particular philosophy.


  1. Siemens & Roodt 2009, p. 546.
  2. Leaf 2014, p. 36.
  3. Knott 1998, pp. 3, 5.
  4. 1 2 3 Hatcher 2015, pp. 4–5, 69–71, 150–152.
  5. Bowker 2000.
  6. Harvey 2001, p. xiii.
  7. 1 2 Smith, Brian K. (1998). "Questioning Authority: Constructions and Deconstructions of Hinduism". International Journal of Hindu Studies. 2 (3): 313–339. doi:10.1007/s11407-998-0001-9. JSTOR   20106612. S2CID   144929213.
  8. 1 2 Sharma & Sharma 2004, pp. 1–2.
  9. 1 2 Klostermaier 2014, p. 2.
  10. 1 2 Klostermaier 2007b, p. 7.
  11. 1 2 Sharma, A (1985). "Did the Hindus have a name for their own religion?". The Journal of the Oriental Society of Australia. 17 (1): 94–98 [95].
  12. 1 2 3 Michaels 2004.
  13. Dharma, Samanya; Kane, P. V. History of Dharmasastra. 2. pp. 4–5. See also Widgery 1930
  14. 1 2 Bilimoria 2007; see also Koller 1968.
  15. 1 2 Flood 1997, p. 11.
  16. 1 2 Klostermaier 2007, pp. 46–52, 76–77.
  17. 1 2 3 Brodd 2003.
  18. 1 2 Ellinger, Herbert (1996). Hinduism. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 69–70. ISBN   978-1-56338-161-4.
  19. Zaehner, R. C. (1992). Hindu Scriptures. Penguin Random House. pp. 1–7. ISBN   978-0-679-41078-2.
  20. 1 2 Clarke, Matthew (2011). Development and Religion: Theology and Practice. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 28. ISBN   978-0-85793-073-6.
  21. Holberg, Dale, ed. (2000). Students' Britannica India. 4. Encyclopædia Britannica India. p. 316. ISBN   978-0-85229-760-5.
  22. Nicholson, Andrew (2013). Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History. Columbia University Press. pp. 2–5. ISBN   978-0-231-14987-7.
  23. 1 2 Samuel 2008, p. 193.
  24. 1 2 Hiltebeitel 2007 , p. 12; Flood 1996 , p. 16; Lockard 2007 , p. 50
  25. 1 2 See also:
    • Ghurye 1980, pp. 3–4: "He [Dr. J. H. Hutton, the Commissioner of the Census of 1931] considers modern Hinduism to be the result of an amalgam between pre-Aryan Indian beliefs of Mediterranean inspiration and the religion of the Rigveda. 'The Tribal religions present, as it were, surplus material not yet built into the temple of Hinduism'."
    • Zimmer 1951, pp. 218–219.
    • Sjoberg 1990, p. 43. Quote: [Tyler (1973). India: An Anthropological Perspective. p. 68.]; "The Hindu synthesis was less the dialectical reduction of orthodoxy and heterodoxy than the resurgence of the ancient, aboriginal Indus civilization. In this process the rude, barbaric Aryan tribes were gradually civilised and eventually merged with the autochthonous Dravidians. Although elements of their domestic cult and ritualism were jealously preserved by Brahman priests, the body of their culture survived only in fragmentary tales and allegories embedded in vast, syncretistic compendia. On the whole, the Aryan contribution to Indian culture is insignificant. The essential pattern of Indian culture was already established in the third millennium B.C., and ... the form of Indian civilization perdured and eventually reasserted itself."
    • Sjoberg 1990.
    • Flood 1996, p. 16: "Contemporary Hinduism cannot be traced to a common origin [...] The many traditions which feed into contemporary Hinduism can be subsumed under three broad headings: the tradition of Brahmanical orthopraxy, the renouncer traditions and popular or local traditions. The tradition of Brahmanical orthopraxy has played the role of 'master narrative', transmitting a body of knowledge and behaviour through time, and defining the conditions of orthopraxy, such as adherence to varnasramadharma."
    • Nath 2001.
    • Werner 1998.
    • Werner 2005, pp. 8–9.
    • Lockard 2007, p. 50.
    • Hiltebeitel 2007.
    • Hopfe & Woodward 2008, p. 79: "The religion that the Aryans brought with them mingled with the religion of the native people, and the culture that developed between them became classical Hinduism."
    • Samuel 2010.
  26. 1 2 3 4 Narayanan 2009, p. 11.
  27. 1 2 Fowler 1997, pp. 1, 7.
  28. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 12.
  29. 1 2 3 4 Larson 2009.
  30. 1 2 Larson 1995, pp. 109–111.
  31. Lipner 2009, pp. 377, 398.
  32. Frazier, Jessica (2011). The Continuum companion to Hindu studies . London: Continuum. pp.  1–15. ISBN   978-0-8264-9966-0.
  33. "Peringatan". sp2010.bps.go.id.
  34. Vertovec, Steven (2013). The Hindu Diaspora: Comparative Patterns. Routledge. pp. 1–4, 7–8, 63–64, 87–88, 141–143. ISBN   978-1-136-36705-2.
  35. "Hindus". Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. 18 December 2012. Retrieved 14 February 2015.;
    "Table: Religious Composition by Country, in Numbers (2010)". Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. 18 December 2012. Archived from the original on 1 February 2013. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
  36. 1 2 Flood 2008, p. 3.
  37. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Flood 1996, p. 6.
  38. Parpola 2015, "Chapter 1".
  39. Parpola (2015) , ”Chapter 9”: "In Iranian languages, Proto-Iranian *s became h before a following vowel at a relatively late period, perhaps around 850–600 BCE."
  40. 1 2 3 Singh 2008, p. 433.
  41. Doniger 2014, p. 5.
  42. Parpola 2015, p. 1.
  43. 1 2 Doniger 2014, p. 3.
  44. 1 2 3 Sharma 2002.
  45. Thapar, Romila (2004). Early India: From the Origins to A.D. 1300. University of California Press. p. 38. ISBN   978-0-520-24225-8.
  46. Thapar 1993, p. 77.
  47. Thompson Platts 1884.
  48. Garg, Gaṅgā Rām (1992). Encyclopaedia of the Hindu World, Volume 1. Concept Publishing Company. p. 3. ISBN   978-81-7022-374-0.
  49. O'Conell, Joseph T. (1973). "The Word 'Hindu' in Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava Texts". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 93 (3): 340–344. doi:10.2307/599467. JSTOR   599467.
  50. 1 2 Sweetman, Will (2003). Mapping Hinduism: 'Hinduism' and the Study of Indian Religions, 1600–1776. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 163, 154–168. ISBN   978-3-931479-49-7.
  51. 1 2 Lipner 2009 , p. 8 Quote: "[...] one need not be religious in the minimal sense described to be accepted as a Hindu by Hindus, or describe oneself perfectly validly as Hindu. One may be polytheistic or monotheistic, monistic or pantheistic,henotheistic, panentheistic ,pandeistic, even an agnostic, humanist or atheist, and still be considered a Hindu."
  52. Kurtz, Lester, ed. (2008). Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace and Conflict. Academic Press. ISBN   978-0-12-369503-1.
  53. MK Gandhi, The Essence of Hinduism , Editor: VB Kher, Navajivan Publishing, see page 3; According to Gandhi, "a man may not believe in God and still call himself a Hindu."
  54. Knott 1998, p. 117.
  55. Sharma 2003, pp. 12–13.
  56. 1 2 Sweetman 2004.
  57. 1 2 3 4 King 1999.
  58. Nussbaum 2009.
  59. Nath 2001, p. 31.
  60. Flood 1996, pp. 113, 154.
  61. Flood 1996, p. 14.
  62. 1 2 June McDaniel "Hinduism", in Corrigan, John (2007). The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Emotion. Oxford University Press. pp. 52–53. ISBN   978-0-19-517021-4.
  63. Michaels 2004, p. 21.
  64. Michaels 2004, p. 22.
  65. 1 2 Michaels 2004, p. 23.
  66. 1 2 3 Michaels 2004, p. 24.
  67. "Definition of RAMAISM". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 28 October 2020.
  68. Michaels 2004, pp. 21–22.
  69. Michaels 2004, pp. 22–23.
  70. 1 2 3 4 Ronald Inden (2001), Imagining India, Indiana University Press, ISBN   978-0-253-21358-7, pages 117–122, 127–130
  71. Insoll, Timothy (2001). Archaeology and world religion. Routledge. ISBN   978-0-415-22155-9.
  72. Bowker 2000; Harvey 2001 , p. xiii
  73. Vivekjivandas 2010, p. 1.
  74. Knott 1998, p. 111.
  75. Hacker, Paul (2006). "Dharma in Hinduism". Journal of Indian Philosophy. 34 (5): 479–496. doi:10.1007/s10781-006-9002-4. S2CID   170922678.
  76. Knott 1998, p. 3.
  77. 1 2 3 4 5 Lipner 2009, pp. 15-17.
  78. Taylor, Patrick; Case, Frederick I. (2013). The Encyclopedia of Caribbean Religions: Volume 1: A - L; Volume 2: M - Z. University of Illinois Press. pp. 902–903. ISBN   978-0-252-09433-0.
  79. Lipner 2009, p. 16.
  80. Michaels 2004 , p. 18; see also Lipner 2009 , p. 77; and Smith, Brian K. (2008). "Hinduism". In Neusner, Jacob (ed.). Sacred Texts and Authority. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 101.
  81. Feuerstein 2002, p. 600.
  82. Clarke 2006, p. 209.
  83. 1 2 Lorenzen 2002, p. 33.
  84. 1 2 3 4 Flood 1996, p. 258.
  85. Flood 1996, pp. 256–261.
  86. Young, Serinity (2007). Hinduism . Marshall Cavendish. p.  87. ISBN   978-0-7614-2116-0 . Retrieved 19 February 2015. Rammohun Roy Father of Hindu Renaissance.
  87. Flood 1996, p. 257.
  88. Flood 1996, p. 259.
  89. Flood 1996, p. 249.
  90. 1 2 3 4 5 Flood 1996, p. 265.
  91. 1 2 3 Flood 1996, p. 267.
  92. Flood 1996, pp. 267–268.
  93. Derrett, J.; Duncan, M. (1973). Dharmaśāstra and juridical literature. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. ISBN   978-3-447-01519-6. OCLC   1130636.
  94. Doniger 2014, p. 20.
  95. Turner 1996a, p. 275.
  96. Ferro-Luzzi (1991). "The Polythetic-Prototype Approach to Hinduism". In Sontheimer, G.D.; Kulke, H. (eds.). Hinduism Reconsidered. Delhi: Manohar. pp. 187–95.
  97. Dasgupta, Surendranath; Banarsidass, Motilall (1992). A history of Indian philosophy (part 1). p. 70.
  98. Chande, M.B. (2000). Indian Philosophy in Modern Times. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. p. 277.
  99. Culp, John (4 December 2008). Edward N. Zalta (ed.). "Panentheism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition).
  100. Smith, W. C. (1962). The Meaning and End of Religion. San Francisco: Harper and Row. p. 65. ISBN   978-0-7914-0361-7.
  101. Halbfass 1991, pp. 1–22.
  102. Klostermaier 1994, p. 1.
  103. Flood 1996, pp. 1, 7.
  104. Lockard 2007 , p. 50; Hiltebeitel 2007 , p. 12
  105. 1 2 3 4 5 Flood 1996, p. 16.
  106. Quack, Johannes; Binder, Stefan (22 February 2018). "Atheism and Rationalism in Hinduism". Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0196.
  107. 1 2 3 4 Halbfass 1991, p. 15.
  108. 1 2 3 Nicholson 2010.
  109. Flood 1996, p. 35.
  110. 1 2 Pinkney, Andrea (2014). Turner, Bryan; Salemink, Oscar (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Religions in Asia. Routledge. pp. 31–32. ISBN   978-0-415-63503-5.
  111. Haines, Jeffrey (2008). Routledge Handbook of Religion and Politics. Routledge. p. 80. ISBN   978-0-415-60029-3.
  112. Halbfass 1991, p. 1.
  113. Deutsch & Dalvi 2004, pp. 99–100.
  114. Deutsch & Dalvi 2004, pp. 100–101.
  115. Deutsch & Dalvi 2004, p. 101.
  116. Nicholson 2010 , p. 2; Lorenzen 2006 , pp. 1–36
  117. Lorenzen 2006, p. 36.
  118. 1 2 Lorenzen 1999, p. 648.
  119. Lorenzen 1999, pp. 648, 655.
  120. Nicholson 2010, p. 2.
  121. Burley 2007, p. 34.
  122. Lorenzen 2006, pp. 24–33.
  123. Lorenzen 2006, p. 27.
  124. Lorenzen 2006, pp. 26–27.
  125. Michaels 2004, p. 44.
  126. Hackel in Nicholson 2010
  127. King 2001.
  128. 1 2 King 1999, pp. 100–102.
  129. Sweetman 2004, pp. 14–15.
  130. Pennington 2005, pp. 76–77.
  131. King 1999, p. 169.
  132. 1 2 3 4 5 Sweetman 2004, p. 13.
  133. 1 2 Sweetman 2004, pp. 13–14.
  134. Sweetman 2004, p. 14.
  135. Sweetman 2004, pp. 14–16.
  136. 1 2 Sweetman 2004, p. 15.
  137. Sweetman 2004, pp. 15–16.
  138. 1 2 Pennington 2005, pp. 4–5 and Chapter 6.
  139. Witz, Klaus G (1998). The Supreme Wisdom of the Upaniṣads: An Introduction, Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 10–11. ISBN   978-81-208-1573-5.
  140. Henderson, John (2014). Scripture, Canon and Commentary. Princeton University Press. p. 120. ISBN   978-0-691-60172-4.
  141. 1 2 Olivelle, Patrick (2014). The Early Upanisads. Oxford University Press. p. 3. ISBN   978-0-19-535242-9. Even though theoretically the whole of Vedic corpus is accepted as revealed truth [shruti], in reality it is the Upanishads that have continued to influence the life and thought of the various religious traditions that we have come to call Hindu. Upanishads are the scriptures par excellence of Hinduism.
  142. Doniger 1990, pp. 2–3: "The Upanishads supply the basis of later Hindu philosophy; they alone of the Vedic corpus are widely known and quoted by most well-educated Hindus, and their central ideas have also become a part of the spiritual arsenal of rank-and-file Hindus."
  143. 1 2 McDowell, Michael; Brown, Nathan (2009). World Religions. Penguin. pp. 208–210. ISBN   978-1-59257-846-7.
  144. Dissanayake, Wiman (1993). Kasulis, Thomas P.; et al. (eds.). Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press. p. 39. ISBN   978-0-7914-1080-6.
  145. Flood, Gavin (1996a). "The meaning and context of the Purusarthas". In Lipner, Julius (ed.). The Fruits of Our Desiring. pp. 16–21. ISBN   978-1-896209-30-2.
  146. "Dharma", The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions : "In Hinduism, dharma is a fundamental concept, referring to the order and custom which make life and a universe possible, and thus to the behaviours appropriate to the maintenance of that order."
  147. 1 2 "Dharma". The Columbia Encyclopedia (6th ed.). Columbia University Press. 2013. ISBN   978-0-7876-5015-5.
  148. 1 2 3 Van Buitenen, J. A. B. (April–July 1957). "Dharma and Moksa". Philosophy East and West. 7 (1/2): 33–40. doi:10.2307/1396832. JSTOR   1396832.
  149. Charles Johnston, The Mukhya Upanishads: Books of Hidden Wisdom, Kshetra, ISBN   978-1-4959-4653-0, page 481, for discussion: pages 478–505
  150. Paul Horsch (Translated by Jarrod Whitaker), From Creation Myth to World Law: The early history of Dharma, Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol 32, pages 423–448, (2004)
  151. Swami Prabhupādā, A. C. Bhaktivedanta (1986). Bhagavad-gītā as it is. The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust. p. 16. ISBN   978-0-89213-268-3.
  152. Koller 1968.
  153. Lochtefeld 2002a, pp. 55–56.
  154. Bruce Sullivan (1997), Historical Dictionary of Hinduism, ISBN   978-0-8108-3327-2, pp. 29–30
  155. Macy, Joanna (1975). "The Dialectics of Desire". Numen. 22 (2): 145–60. doi:10.2307/3269765. JSTOR   3269765.
  156. Monier Williams, काम, kāma Monier-Williams Sanskrit English Dictionary, pp 271, see 3rd column
  157. See:
  158. R.C. Mishra, "Moksha and the Hindu Worldview", Psychology & Developing Societies, Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 23, 27
  159. Rinehart 2004, pp. 19–21.
  160. J. Bruce Long (1980), "The concepts of human action and rebirth in the Mahabharata", in Wendy D. O'Flaherty, Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions, University of California Press, ISBN   978-0-520-03923-0, Chapter 2
  161. Europa Publications Staff (2003). The Far East and Australasia, 2003 – Regional surveys of the world. Routledge. p. 39. ISBN   978-1-85743-133-9.
  162. Hindu spirituality - Volume 25 of Documenta missionalia. Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana. 1999. p. 1. ISBN   978-88-7652-818-7.
  163. 1 2 3 Karl Potter, "Dharma and Mokṣa from a Conversational Point of View", Philosophy East and West, Vol. 8, No. 1/2 (Apr.–Jul. 1958), pp. 49–63
  164. 1 2 3 4 Klaus Klostermaier, "Mokṣa and Critical Theory", Philosophy East and West, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Jan. 1985), pp. 61–71
  165. 1 2 Deutsch 2001.
  166. 1 2 Daniel H. H. Ingalls, "Dharma and Moksha", Philosophy East and West, Vol. 7, No. 1/2 (Apr.–Jul. 1957), pp. 41–48
  167. von Brück, M. (1986). "Imitation or Identification?". Indian Theological Studies. 23 (2): 95–105.
  168. Andrew Fort (1998), Jivanmukti in Transformation, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-0-7914-3904-3
  169. Apte, Vaman S (1997). The Student's English-Sanskrit Dictionary (New ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas. ISBN   978-81-208-0300-8.
  170. Smith, Huston (1991). The World's Religions: Our Great Wisdom Traditions . San Francisco: Harper. p. 64. ISBN   978-0-06-250799-0.
  171. Karl Potter (1964), "The Naturalistic Principle of Karma", Philosophy East and West, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Apr. 1964), pp. 39–49
  172. 1 2 Wendy D. O'Flaherty (1980), Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions, University of California Press, ISBN   978-0-520-03923-0, pp. xi–xxv (Introduction) and 3–37
  173. Karl Potter (1980), in Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions (O'Flaherty, Editor), University of California Press, ISBN   978-0-520-03923-0, pp. 241–267
  174. Radhakrishnan 1996, p. 254.
  175. Vivekananda, Swami (2005). Jnana Yoga. Kessinger Publishing. pp. 301–302. ISBN   978-1-4254-8288-6. (8th Printing 1993)
  176. Christopher Chapple (1986), Karma and Creativity, State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-0-88706-251-3; pp. 60–64
  177. Chakravarti, Sitansu (1991). Hinduism, a way of life. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 71. ISBN   978-81-208-0899-7.
  178. Michaels 2004, p. xiv.
  179. Gill, N.S. "Henotheism". About, Inc. Archived from the original on 17 March 2007. Retrieved 5 July 2007.
  180. Kramer 1986, pp.  34–.
  181. Christian 2011, pp.  18–.
  182. Singh 2008, pp.  206–.
  183. Flood 1996, p. 226.
  184. Flood 1996 , p. 226; Kramer 1986 , pp. 20–21
  185. Muller, Max (1878). Lectures on the Origins and Growth of Religions: As Illustrated by the Religions of India. Longmans Green & Co. pp. 260–271.
    Wilkins, William Joseph (1882). Hindu Mythology: Vedic and Purānic. Calcutta: London Missionary Society. p. 8.
  186. Raghavendrachar, H.N. (1944). "Monism in the Vedas" (PDF). Section A – Arts. The Half-yearly Journal of the Mysore University. 4 (2): 137–152. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 February 2015.
    Werner, K. (1982). "Men, gods and powers in the Vedic outlook". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland. 114 (1): 14–24. doi:10.1017/S0035869X00158575.
    Coward, H. (1995). "The Limits of Scripture: Vivekananda's Reinterpretation of the Vedas". Book Review. Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies. 8 (1): 45–47. doi:10.7825/2164-6279.1116. There is little doubt that the theo-monistic category is an appropriate one for viewing a wide variety of experiences in the Hindu tradition
  187. Monier-Williams 1974, pp. 20–37.
  188. Bhaskarananda 1994
  189. Vivekananda 1987.
  190. John Koller (2012), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion (Editors: Chad Meister, Paul Copan), Routledge, ISBN   978-0-415-78294-4, pages 99–107
  191. Lance Nelson (1996), "Living liberation in Shankara and classical Advaita", in Living Liberation in Hindu Thought (Editors: Andrew O. Fort, Patricia Y. Mumme), State University of New York Press, ISBN   978-0-7914-2706-4, pages 38–39, 59 (footnote 105)
  192. 1 2 R Prasad (2009), A Historical-developmental Study of Classical Indian Philosophy of Morals, Concept Publishing, ISBN   978-81-8069-595-7, pages 345–347
  193. Eliade 2009, pp. 73–76.
  194. Radhakrishnan & Moore 1967, pp. 37–39, 401–403, 498–503.
  195. Monier-Williams 2001.
  196. 1 2 3 4 Buttimer, Anne; Wallin, L. (1999). Nature and Identity in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Springer. pp. 64–68. ISBN   978-0-7923-5651-6.
  197. Berntsen, Maxine (1988). The Experience of Hinduism: Essays on Religion in Maharashtra . State University of New York Press. pp.  18–19. ISBN   978-0-88706-662-7.
  198. Taittiriya Upanishad Thirteen Principal Upanishads, Robert Hume (Translator), pages 281–282;
    Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-81-208-1468-4, pages 229–231
  199. Mabry, John R. (2006). Noticing the Divine: An Introduction to Interfaith Spiritual Guidance. New York: Morehouse. pp. 32–33. ISBN   978-0-8192-2238-1.
  200. Samovar, Larry A.; Porter, Richard E.; McDaniel, Edwin R.; et al. (2016). Communication Between Cultures. Cengage. pp. 140–144. ISBN   978-1-305-88806-7.
  201. Werner 2005, pp. 9, 15, 49, 54, 86.
  202. Renou 1964, p. 55.
  203. 1 2 Harman 2004 , pp. 104–106
  204. Harlan, Lindsey (1992). Religion and Rajput Women: The Ethic of Protection in Contemporary Narratives. University of California Press. pp. 19–20, 48 with footnotes. ISBN   978-0-520-07339-5.
  205. 1 2
    • Hark & DeLisser 2011 , p. [ page needed ]. "Three gods, Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva, and other deities are considered manifestations of and are worshipped as incarnations of Brahman."
    • Toropov & Buckles 2011 , p. [ page needed ]. "The members of various Hindu sects worship a dizzying number of specific deities and follow innumerable rituals in honor of specific gods. Because this is Hinduism, however, its practitioners see the profusion of forms and practices as expressions of the same unchanging reality. The panoply of deities is understood by believers as symbols for a single transcendent reality."
    • Espín & Nickoloff 2007 , p. [ page needed ]. "The devas are powerful spiritual beings, somewhat like angels in the West, who have certain functions in the cosmos and live immensely long lives. Certain devas, such as Ganesha, are regularly worshiped by the Hindu faithful. Note that, while Hindus believe in many devas, many are monotheistic to the extent that they will recognise only one Supreme Being, a God or Goddess who is the source and ruler of the devas."
  206. Bassuk, Daniel E (1987). Incarnation in Hinduism and Christianity: The Myth of the God-Man. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 2–4. ISBN   978-1-349-08642-9.
  207. Hacker, Paul (1978). Schmithausen, Lambert (ed.). Zur Entwicklung der Avataralehre (in German). Otto Harrassowitz. pp. 424, also 405–409, 414–417. ISBN   978-3-447-04860-6.
  208. Kinsley, David (2005). Jones, Lindsay (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion. 2 (Second ed.). Thomson Gale. pp. 707–708. ISBN   978-0-02-865735-6.
  209. Bryant 2007, p. 18.
  210. McDaniel, June (2004). Offering Flowers, Feeding Skulls : Popular Goddess Worship in West Bengal: Popular Goddess Worship in West Bengal. Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 90–91. ISBN   978-0-19-534713-5.
  211. Hawley, John Stratton; Narayanan, Vasudha (2006). The life of Hinduism. University of California Press. p. 174. ISBN   978-0-520-24914-1.
  212. Kinsley, David R. (1998). Tantric Visions of the Divine Feminine: The Ten Mahāvidyās. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 115–119. ISBN   978-81-208-1522-3.
  213. "Shiva" in Lochtefeld 2002n , p. 635
  214. John Clayton (2010), Religions, Reasons and Gods: Essays in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Religion, Cambridge University Press, ISBN   978-0-521-12627-4, page 150
  215. Sharma, C. (1997). A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN   978-81-208-0365-7, pages 209–10
  216. Reichenbach, Bruce R. (April 1989). "Karma, causation, and divine intervention". Philosophy East and West. 39 (2): 135–149 [145]. doi:10.2307/1399374. JSTOR   1399374. Archived from the original on 27 October 2009. Retrieved 29 December 2009.
  217. Rajadhyaksha (1959). The six systems of Indian philosophy. p. 95. Under the circumstances God becomes an unnecessary metaphysical assumption. Naturally the Sankhyakarikas do not mention God, Vachaspati interprets this as rank atheism.
  218. 1 2 Coward 2008 , p. 114: "For the Mimamsa the ultimate reality is nothing other than the eternal words of the Vedas. They did not accept the existence of a single supreme creator god, who might have composed the Veda. According to the Mimamsa, gods named in the Vedas have no existence apart from the mantras that speak their names. The power of the gods, then, is nothing other than the power of the mantras that name them."
  219. Sen Gupta 1986, p. viii.
  220. Neville, Robert (2001). Religious truth. p. 51. ISBN   978-0-7914-4778-9. Mimamsa theorists (theistic and atheistic) decided that the evidence allegedly proving the existence of God was insufficient. They also thought there was no need to postulate a maker for the world, just as there was no need for an author to compose the Veda or an independent God to validate the Vedic rituals.
  221. A Goel (1984), Indian philosophy: Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika and modern science, Sterling, ISBN   978-0-86590-278-7, pages 149–151
  222. Collins, Randall (2000), The sociology of philosophies, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, ISBN   978-0-674-00187-9, p. 836
  223. Klostermaier 2007, pp. 337–338.
  224. Burley, Mike (2012). Classical Samkhya and Yoga – An Indian Metaphysics of Experience. Routledge. pp. 39–41. ISBN   978-0-415-64887-5.;
    Pflueger, Lloyd (2008). Knut Jacobsen (ed.). Person Purity and Power in Yogasutra, in Theory and Practice of Yoga. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 38–39. ISBN   978-81-208-3232-9.;
    Behanan, Kovoor T. (2002). Yoga: Its Scientific Basis. Dover. pp. 56–58. ISBN   978-0-486-41792-9.
  225. Knut Jacobsen (2008), Theory and Practice of Yoga: Essays in Honour of Gerald James Larson, Moti