Indian National Army

Last updated

Indian National Army
ActiveAugust 1942 – September 1945
Country1931 Flag of India.svg  Free India (after Oct. 1943)
Role Guerrilla, infantry, special operations
Size43,000 (approximate)
Motto(s)Ittehad, Itmad aur Qurbani
(Unity, Faith and Sacrifice in Urdu)
March Qadam Qadam Badaye Ja
Engagements World War II
Ceremonial chief Subhas Chandra Bose
Commander Mohammad Zaman Kiani
Mohan Singh
Jaganath Rao Bhonsle
Shah Nawaz Khan
Prem Sahgal

The Indian National Army (INA; Azad Hind Fauj /ˈɑːzɑːðˈhinðˈfɔː/ ; Svatantr Bhārat Senā lit.: Free Indian Army) was an armed force formed by Indian nationalists in 1942 in Southeast Asia during World War II. Its aim was to secure Indian independence from British rule. It formed an alliance with Imperial Japan in the latter's campaign in the Southeast Asian theatre of WWII. [1] The army was first formed in 1942 under Rash Behari Bose, by Indian PoWs of the British-Indian Army captured by Japan in the Malayan campaign and at Singapore. [2] This first INA collapsed and was disbanded in December that year after differences between the INA leadership and the Japanese military over its role in Japan's war in Asia.Rash Behari Bose handed over INA to Subhas Chandra Bose. [3] It was revived under the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose after his arrival in Southeast Asia in 1943. The army was declared to be the army of Bose's Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind (the Provisional Government of Free India). [4] Under Bose's leadership, the INA drew ex-prisoners and thousands of civilian volunteers from the Indian expatriate population in Malaya (present-day Malaysia) and Burma. [5] This second INA fought along with the Imperial Japanese Army against the British and Commonwealth forces in the campaigns in Burma: at Imphal and Kohima, and later against the Allied retaking of Burma. [6] [7]


After the INA's initial formation in 1942, there was concern in the British-Indian Army that further Indian troops would defect. This led to a reporting ban and a propaganda campaign called "Jiffs" to preserve the loyalty of the Sepoy. [8] Historians like Peter W. Fay who have written about the army, however, consider the INA not to have had significant influence on the war. [9] The end of the war saw many of the troops repatriated to India where some faced trials for treason. These trials became a galvanising point in the Indian Independence movement. [10] The Bombay mutiny in the Royal Indian Navy and other mutinies in 1946 are thought to have been caused by the nationalist feelings that were caused by the INA trials. [11] Historians like Sumit Sarkar, Peter Cohen, Fay and others suggest that these events played a crucial role in hastening the end of British rule. [12] [13] A number of people associated with the INA during the war later went on to hold important roles in public life in India as well as in other countries in Southeast Asia, most notably Lakshmi Sehgal in India, and John Thivy and Janaki Athinahappan in Malaya. [14]

It was associated with Imperial Japan and the other Axis powers, and accusations were levelled against INA troops of being involved and complicit in Japanese war crimes. [15] The INA's members were viewed as Axis collaborators by British soldiers and Indian PoWs who did not join the army, [16] but after the war they were seen as patriots by many Indians. [16] Although they were widely commemorated by the Indian National Congress in the immediate aftermath of Indian independence, members of the INA were denied freedom fighter status by the Government of India, unlike those in the Gandhian movement. [17] Nevertheless, the army remains a popular and passionate topic in Indian culture and politics. [5] [16] [18]

First INA

Major Iwaichi Fujiwara greets Mohan Singh. Circa April 1942. Fujiwara Kikan.jpg
Major Iwaichi Fujiwara greets Mohan Singh. Circa April 1942.

Before the start of World War II, Japan and South-East Asia were major refuges for exiled Indian nationalists. Meanwhile, Japan had sent intelligence missions, notably under Maj. Iwaichi Fujiwara, into South Asia to gather support from the Malayan sultans, overseas Chinese, the Burmese resistance and the Indian independence movement. The Minami Kikan successfully recruited Burmese nationalists, while the F Kikan was successful in establishing contacts with Indian nationalists in exile in Thailand and Malaya. [19] [20] Fujiwara, later self-described as "Lawrence of the Indian National Army" (after Lawrence of Arabia) is said to have been a man committed to the values which his office was supposed to convey to the expatriate nationalist leaders, and found acceptance among them. [20] [21] His initial contact was with Giani Pritam Singh and the Thai-Bharat Cultural Lodge. [20] At the outbreak of World War II in South-East Asia, 70,000 Indian troops (mostly Sikhs) were stationed in Malaya. In Japan's spectacular Malayan Campaign many Indian prisoners-of-war were captured, including nearly 45,000 after the fall of Singapore alone. [22] The conditions of service within the British-Indian Army and the social conditions in Malaya had led to dissension among these troops. [23] [24] From these prisoners, the First Indian National Army was formed under Mohan Singh. Singh was an officer in the British-Indian Army who was captured early in the Malayan campaign. His nationalist sympathies found an ally in Fujiwara and he received considerable Japanese aid and support. [25] Ethnic Indians in Southeast Asia also supported the cause of Indian independence and had formed local leagues in Malaya before the war. These came together with encouragement from Japan after the occupation, forming the Indian Independence League (IIL). [26]

Although there were a number of prominent local Indians working in the IIL, the overall leadership came to rest with Rash Behari Bose, an Indian revolutionary who had lived in self-exile in Japan since World War I. [27] The League and INA leadership decided that the INA was to be subordinate to the IIL. A working council – composed of prominent members of the League and the INA leaders – was to decide on decisions to send the INA to war. [28] The Indian leaders feared that they would appear to be Japanese puppets, so a decision was taken that the INA would go to battle only when the Indian National Congress called it to do so. [29] [30] Assurances of non-interference— later termed the Bidadary resolutions— were demanded of Japan; these would have amounted to a treaty with an independent government. [22] In this time, F kikan had been replaced by the Iwakuro Kikan (or I Kikan) headed by Hideo Iwakuro. Iwakuro's working relationship with the league was more tenuous. Japan did not immediately agree to the demands arising from the Bidadary resolutions. Differences also existed between Rash Behari and the League, not least because Rash Behari had lived in Japan for considerable time and had a Japanese wife and a son in the Imperial Japanese Army. [31] On the other hand, Mohan Singh expected military strategy and decisions to be autonomous decisions for the INA, independent of the league. [32]

In November and December 1942, concern about Japan's intentions towards the INA led to disagreement between the INA and the League on the one hand and the Japanese on the other. [3] The INA leadership resigned along with that of the League (except Rash Behari). The unit was dissolved by Mohan Singh in December 1942, and he ordered the troops of the INA to return to PoW camps. [33] [34] Mohan Singh was expected to be shot. [33]

Between December 1942 and February 1943, Rash Behari struggled to hold the INA together. [35] On 15 February 1943, the army itself was put under the command of Lt. Col. M.Z. Kiani. [36] A policy forming body was formed with Lt. Col J.R. Bhonsle (Director of the Military Bureau) in charge and clearly placed under the authority of the IIL. Under Bhonsle served Lt. Col. Shah Nawaz Khan as Chief of General Staff, Major P.K. Sahgal as Military Secretary, Major Habib ur Rahman as commandant of the Officers' Training School and Lt. Col. A.C. Chatterji (later Major A.D. Jahangir) as head of enlightenment and culture. [35] [37]

Second INA

Subhas Chandra Bose

Suggestions that Subhas Chandra Bose was the ideal person to lead a rebel army into India came from the very beginning of F Kikan's work with captured Indian soldiers. Mohan Singh himself, soon after his first meeting with Fujiwara, had suggested that Bose was the right leader of a nationalist Indian army. [38] A number of the officers and troops – including some who now returned to prisoner-of-war camps and some who had not volunteered in the first place – made it known that they would be willing to join the INA only if it was led by Subhas Bose. [39] Bose was a nationalist. He had joined the Gandhian movement after resigning from a prestigious post in the Indian Civil Service in 1922, quickly rising in the Congress and being incarcerated repeatedly by the Raj. [40] By late 1920s he and Nehru were considered the future leaders of the Congress. [41] In the late 1920s, he was amongst the first Congress leaders to call for complete independence from Britain (Purna Swaraj), rather than the previous Congress objective of India becoming a British dominion. [41] In Bengal, he was repeatedly accused by Raj officials of working with the revolutionary movement. Under his leadership, the Congress youth group in Bengal was organised into a quasi-military organisation called the Bengal Volunteers. [42] Bose deplored Gandhi's pacifism; Gandhi disagreed with Bose's confrontations with the Raj. [41] The Congress's working committee, including Nehru, was predominantly loyal to Gandhi. [41] While openly disagreeing with Gandhi, Bose won the presidency of Indian National Congress twice in the 1930s. His second victory came despite opposition from Gandhi. He defeated Gandhi's favoured candidate, Bhogaraju Pattabhi Sitaramayya, in the popular vote, but the entire working committee resigned and refused to work with Bose. [43] Bose resigned from the Congress presidency and founded his own faction, the All India Forward Bloc. [44]

At the start of World War II, Bose was placed under house-arrest by the Raj. [45] He escaped in disguise and made his way through Afghanistan and Central -Asia. He came first to the Soviet Union and then to Germany, reaching Berlin on 2 April 1941. [14] [43] There he -sought to raise an army of Indian soldiers from prisoners of war captured by Germany, [46] forming the Free India Legion and the Azad Hind Radio. [47] The Japanese ambassador, Oshima Hiroshi, kept Tokyo informed of these developments. [48] From the very start of the war, the Japanese intelligence services noted from speaking to captured Indian soldiers that Bose was held in extremely high regard as a nationalist and was considered by Indian soldiers to be the right person to be leading a rebel army. [38]

In a series of meetings between the INA leaders and the Japanese in 1943, it was decided to cede the leadership of the IIL and the INA to Bose. In January 1943, the Japanese invited Bose to lead the Indian nationalist movement in East Asia. [49] He accepted and left Germany on 8 February. After a three-month journey by submarine and a short stop in Singapore, he reached Tokyo on 11 May 1943. In Tokyo, he met Hideki Tojo, the Japanese prime minister, and the Japanese High Command. He then arrived in Singapore in July 1943, where he made a number of radio broadcasts to Indians in Southeast Asia exhorting them to join in the fight for India's independence. [50]


On 4 July 1943, two days after reaching Singapore, Bose assumed the leadership of the IIL and the INA in a ceremony at Cathay Building. Bose's influence was notable. His appeal re-invigorated the INA, which had previously consisted mainly of prisoners of war: it also attracted Indian expatriates in South Asia. He famously proclaimed: [51]

Give me blood! I will give you freedom ...

"Local civilians joined the INA, doubling its strength. They included barristers, traders and plantation workers, as well as Khudabadi Sindhi Swarankars who were working as shop keepers; many had no military experience." [52] [53] Carl Vadivella Belle estimates under Bose's dynamic appeal, membership of the IIL peaked at 350,000, while almost 100,000 local Indians in South-east Asia volunteered to join the INA, with the army ultimately reaching a force of 50,000. [52] Hugh Toye— a British Intelligence officer and author of a 1959 history of the army called The Springing Tiger — and American historian Peter Fay (author of a 1993 history called The Forgotten Army) have reached similar estimates of troop strength. The first INA is considered to have comprised about 40,000 troops, of whom about 4,000 withdrew when it was disbanded in December 1942. The Second INA started with 12,000 troops. [54] Further recruitment of former Indian Army personnel added about 8,000–10,000. About 18,000 Indian civilians also enlisted during this time. [55] Belle estimates almost 20,000 were local Malayan Indians, while another 20,000 were ex-British-Indian Army members who volunteered for the INA. [52]

Subhas Bose with Mohandas Gandhi at a Congress meeting, c 1930 Gandhi and Subhas Bose.jpg
Subhas Bose with Mohandas Gandhi at a Congress meeting, c 1930

The exact organisation of the INA and its precise troop strength is not known, since its records were destroyed by the withdrawing Azad Hind Government before Rangoon was recaptured by Commonwealth forces in 1945. [56] The order of battle described by Fay (constructed from discussions with INA-veterans), nonetheless, is similar to that described of the first INA by Toye in The Springing Tiger. The 1st Division, under M.Z. Kiani, drew many ex-Indian army prisoners of war who had joined Mohan Singh's first INA. It also drew prisoners of war who had not joined in 1942. It consisted of the 2nd Guerrilla Regiment (the Gandhi Brigade) consisting of two battalions under Col. Inayat Kiani; the 3rd Guerrilla Regiment (the Azad Brigade) with three battalions under Col. Gulzara Singh; and the 4th Guerrilla Regiment (or Nehru Brigade) commanded by the end of the war by Lt. Col Gurubaksh Singh Dhillon. [57] The 1st Guerrilla Regiment – the Subhas Brigade  – under Col. Shah Nawaz Khan was an independent unit, consisting of three infantry battalions. A special operations group was also to be set up called the Bahadur group (Valiant), to operate behind enemy lines. [58]

A training school for INA officers, led by Habib ur Rahman, and the Azad School for the civilian volunteers were set up to provide training to the recruits. A youth wing of the INA, composed of 45 young Indians personally chosen by Bose and known as the Tokyo Boys, was also sent to Japan's Imperial Military Academy, where its members trained as fighter pilots. A separate all-female unit was also created under Lakshmi Sahgal. This unit was intended to have combat-commitments. [59] Named Jhansi ki Rani ("Jhansi Queens") Regiment (after the legendary rebel Queen Lakshmibai of the 1857 rebellion), it drew female civilian volunteers from Malaya and Burma. The 1st Division was lightly armed. Each battalion was composed of five companies of infantry. The individual companies were armed with six antitank rifles, six Bren guns and six Vickers machine guns. Some NCOs carried hand grenades, while senior officers of the Bahadur groups attached to each unit issued hand grenades (of captured British stock) to men going forward on duty. [60]

The 2nd Division was organised under Colonel Abdul Aziz Tajik [61] It was formed largely after the Imphal offensive had started and drew large remnants of what remained of the Hindustan Field Force of the First INA. The 2nd Division consisted of the 1st Infantry Regiment, which later merged with the 5th Guerrilla Regiment to form the INA's 2nd Infantry Regiment under Col Prem Sahgal. The 1st Infantry Regiment drew many civilian volunteers from Burma and Malaya and was equipped with largest share of the heavy armament that the INA possessed. [62] An additional 3rd Division of the INA was composed chiefly of local volunteers in Malaya and Singapore. This unit disbanded before Japan surrendered. A motor transport division was also created, but it was severely limited by lack of resources. In 1945, at the end of the INA, it consisted of about 40,000 soldiers. [63] Unlike Mohan Singh, whose assumption of the rank of general had generated opposition, Bose refused to take a rank. [64] Both the soldiers of the INA and civilians addressed Bose as Netaji ("Dear leader"), a term first used in Berlin by members of the Free India Legion. [65] In October 1943, Bose proclaimed the formation of the Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind , or the Provisional Government of Free India (also known as Azad Hind or Free India). The INA was declared to be the army of Azad Hind. [66]


On 23 October 1943, Azad Hind declared war against Britain and the United States. [67] Its first formal commitment came with the opening of the Japanese offensive towards Manipur, code named U-Go . In the initial plans for invasion of India, Field Marshall Terauschi had been reluctant to confer any responsibilities to the INA beyond espionage and propaganda. [68] Bose rejected this as the role of Fifth-columnists, [68] and insisted that INA should contribute substantially in troops to form a distinct identity of an Indian-liberation army. He secured from Japanese army Chief of Staff, General Sugiyama, the agreement that INA would rank as an allied army in the offensive. [69] The advanced headquarters of Azad Hind was moved to Rangoon in anticipation of success. The INA's own strategy was to avoid set-piece battles, for which it lacked armament as well as manpower. [70] Initially it sought to obtain arms and increase its ranks by inducing British-Indian soldiers to defect. The latter were expected to defect in large numbers. Col Prem Sahgal, once military secretary to Subhas Bose and later tried in the first Red Fort trials, explained the INA strategy to Peter Fay [71]  – although the war itself hung in balance and nobody was sure if the Japanese would win, initiating a popular revolution with grass-roots support within India would ensure that even if Japan ultimately lost the war, Britain would not be in a position to re-assert its colonial authority. It was planned that, once Japanese forces had broken through British defences at Imphal, the INA would cross the hills of North-East India into the Gangetic plain, where it would work as a guerrilla army. [72] This army was expected to live off the land, with captured British supplies,support, and personnel from the local population. [73]


Radio transmitting set seized from INA agents in Calcutta, 1944. Four agents had been landed by submarine on the Indian coast, tasked with setting up a wireless post. Indian National Army Possessed Transmitter - 1944 CE - Kolkata 2017-02-05 5116.JPG
Radio transmitting set seized from INA agents in Calcutta, 1944. Four agents had been landed by submarine on the Indian coast, tasked with setting up a wireless post.

The plans chosen by Bose and Masakazu Kawabe, chief of Burma area army, envisaged the INA being assigned an independent sector in the U-Go offensive. No INA units were to operate at less than battalion strength. [74] For operational purposes, the Subhas Brigade was placed under the command of the Japanese General Headquarters in Burma. Advance parties of the Bahadur Group also went forward with advanced Japanese units. [75] As the offensive opened, the INA's 1st Division, consisting of four guerrilla regiments, was divided between U Go and the diversionary Ha-Go offensive in Arakan. [74] [76] One battalion reached as far as Mowdok in Chittagong after breaking through the British West African Division. [77] [78] A Bahadur Group unit, led by Col. Shaukat Malik, took the border enclave of Moirang in early April. [79] The main body of the 1st Division was however committed to the U-Go, directed towards Manipur. Led by Shah Nawaz Khan, it successfully protected the Japanese flanks against Chin and Kashin guerrillas as Renya Mutaguchi's three divisions crossed the Chindwin river and the Naga Hills, and participated in the main offensive through Tamu in the direction of Imphal and Kohima. [6] [80] The 2nd Division, under M.Z. Kiani, was placed to the right flank of the 33rd Division attacking Kohima. However, by the time Khan's forces left Tamu, the offensive had been held, and Khan's troops were redirected to Kohima. After reaching Ukhrul, near Kohima, they found Japanese forces had begun their withdrawal from the area. The INA's forces suffered the same fate as Mutaguchi's army when the siege of Imphal was broken. With little or nothing in the way of supplies, and with additional difficulties caused by the monsoon, Allied air dominance, and Burmese irregular forces, the 1st and 2nd divisions began withdrawing alongside the 15th Army and Burma Area Army. During the withdrawal through Manipur, a weakened Gandhi regiment held its position against the advancing Maratha Light Infantry on the Burma–India road while the general withdrawal was prepared. [81] [82] The 2nd and 3rd INA regiments protected the flanks of the Yamamoto force successfully at the most critical time during this withdrawal, [83] but wounded and diseased men succumbed to starvation along the route. Commonwealth troops following the Japanese forces found INA dead along with Japanese troops who had died of starvation. [84] The INA lost a substantial number of men and amount of materiel in this retreat. A number of units were disbanded or used to feed into new divisions. [85]


As the Allied Burma campaign began the following year, the INA remained committed to the defence of Burma and was a part of the Japanese defensive deployments. The Second Division was tasked with the defence of Irrawaddy and the adjoining areas around Nangyu, and offered opposition to Messervy's 7th Indian Division when it attempted to cross the river at Pagan and Nyangyu during Irrawaddy operations. [7] [86] Later, during the Battles of Meiktila and Mandalay, the forces under Prem Sahgal were tasked with defending the area around Mount Popa from the British 17th Division, which would have exposed the flank of Heitarō Kimura's forces attempting to retake Meiktila and Nyangyu. The division was obliterated, at times fighting tanks with hand grenades and bottles of petrol. [87] [88] Many INA soldiers realised that they were in a hopeless position. Many surrendered to pursuing Commonwealth forces. Isolated, losing men to exhaustion and to desertion, low on ammunition and food, and pursued by Commonwealth forces, the surviving units of the second division began an attempt to withdraw towards Rangoon. They broke through encircling Commonwealth lines a number of times before finally surrendering at various places in early April 1945. [86] [89] As the Japanese situation became precarious, the Azad Hind government withdrew from Rangoon to Singapore, along with the remnants of the 1st Division and the Rani of Jhansi Regiment. Nearly 6,000 troops of the surviving units of the INA remained in Rangoon under A. D. Loganathan. They surrendered as Rangoon fell and helped keep order until the Allied forces entered the city. [90]

As the Japanese withdrawal from Burma progressed, other remnants of the INA began a long march over land and on foot towards Bangkok. In what has been called an "epic retreat to safety", [91] Bose walked with his troops, refusing to leave them despite Japanese soldiers finding him transport. [92] The withdrawing forces regularly suffered casualties from Allied planes strafing them and in clashes with Aung San's Burmese resistance, as well as from Chinese guerrillas who harassed the Japanese troops. [92] Bose returned to Singapore in August to what remained of the INA and Azad Hind. He wished to stay with his government at Singapore to surrender to the British, reasoning that a trial in India and possible execution would ignite the country, serving the independence movement. He was convinced not to do so by the Azad Hind cabinet. [93] At the time of Japan's surrender in September 1945, Bose left for Dalian near the Soviet border in Japanese-occupied China to attempt to contact the advancing Soviet troops, and was reported to have died in an air crash near Taiwan. [94] [95] The remaining INA troops surrendered under the command of M.Z. Kiani to British-Indian forces at Singapore. [96]

End of the INA

Repatriation to India

Troops of the Indian National Army who surrendered at Mount Popa. Circa April 1945. Surrendered Indian National Army troops at Mount Popa.jpg
Troops of the Indian National Army who surrendered at Mount Popa. Circa April 1945.

Even before the end of the war in South Asia, the INA prisoners who were falling into Allied hands were being evaluated by forward intelligence units for potential trials. [97] Almost fifteen hundred had been captured in the battles of Imphal and Kohima and the subsequent withdrawal, [98] while larger numbers surrendered or were captured during the 14th Army's Burma Campaign. A total of 16,000 of the INA's 43,000 recruits were captured, of whom around 11,000 were interrogated by the Combined Services Directorate of Investigation Corps (CSDIC). [99] The number of prisoners necessitated this selective policy which anticipated trials of those with the strongest commitment to Bose's ideologies. Those with lesser commitment or other extenuating circumstances would be dealt with more leniently, with the punishment proportional to their commitment or war crimes. [100] For this purpose, the field intelligence units designated the captured troops as Blacks with strongest commitment to Azad Hind; Greys with varying commitment but also with enticing circumstances that led them to join the INA; and Whites, those who were pressured into joining the INA under the circumstances but with no commitment to Azad Hind, INA, or Bose. [101]

By July 1945, a large number had been shipped back to India. At the time of the fall of Japan, the remaining captured troops were transported to India via Rangoon. Large numbers of local Malay and Burmese volunteers, including the recruits to the Rani of Jhansi regiment, returned to civilian life and were not identified. [100] Those repatriated passed through transit camps in Chittagong and Calcutta to be held at detention camps all over India including Jhingergacha and Nilganj near Calcutta, Kirkee outside Pune, Attock, Multan and at Bahadurgarh near Delhi. Bahadurgarh also held prisoners of the Free India Legion. [97] By November, around 12,000 INA prisoners were held in these camps; they were released according to the "colours". [97] By December, around 600 whites were released per week. The process to select those to face trial started. [97]

The British-Indian Army intended to implement appropriate internal disciplinary action against its soldiers who had joined the INA, whilst putting to trial a selected group in order to preserve discipline in the Indian Army and to award punishment for criminal acts where these had occurred. [102] As news of the army spread within India, it began to draw widespread sympathy support and admiration from Indians. Newspaper reports around November 1945 reported executions of INA troops, [103] which worsened the already volatile situation. Increasingly violent confrontations broke out between the police and protesters at the mass rallies being held all over India, culminating in public riotings in support of the INA men. [104] [105] [106] This public outcry defied traditional communal barriers of the subcontinent, representing a departure from the divisions between Hindus and Muslims seen elsewhere in the independence movement and campaign for Pakistan. [107]

Red Fort trials

Between November 1945 and May 1946, approximately ten courts-martial were held in public at the Red Fort in Delhi. Claude Auchinleck, the Commander-in-Chief of the British-Indian army, hoped that by holding public trials in the Red Fort, public opinion would turn against the INA if the media reported stories of torture and collaborationsim, helping him settle a political as well as military question. [108] Those to stand trials were accused variously of murder, torture and "waging war against the King-Emperor". However, the first and most celebrated joint courts-martial – those of Prem Sahgal, Gurubaksh Singh Dhillon and Shah Nawaz Khan – were not the story of torture and murder Auchinleck had hoped to tell the Indian press and people. The accusations against them included alleged murder of their comrades-in-arms in the INA whilst in Burma. Peter Fay highlights in his book The Forgotten Army that the murders alleged were in fact courts-martial of captured deserters the defendants had presided over. If it was accepted that the three were part of a genuine combatant army (as the legal defence team later argued), they had followed due process of written INA law and of the normal process of conduct of war in execution of the sentences. [109] Indians rapidly came to view the soldiers who enlisted as patriots and not enemy-collaborators. Philip Mason, then Secretary of the War Department, later wrote that "in a matter of weeks ... in a wave of nationalist emotion, the INA were acclaimed heroes who fought for the freedom of India." [110] The three accused were from the three major religions of India: Hinduism, Islam, and Sikhism. Indians felt the INA represented a true, secular, national army when judged against the British-Indian Army, where caste and religious differences were preserved amongst ranks. [107] [111] The opening of the first trial saw violence and a series of riots in a scale later described as "sensational". [12] The Indian National Congress and the Muslim League both made the release of the INA prisoners an important political issue during the campaign for independence in 1945–1946. [112] Lahore in Diwali 1946 remained dark as the traditional earthen lamps lit on Diwali were not lit by families in support of prisoners. [113] In addition to civilian campaigns of non-cooperation and non-violent protest, protest spread to include mutinies within the British-Indian Army and sympathy within the British-Indian forces. Support for the INA crossed communal barriers to the extent that it was the last major campaign in which the Congress and the Muslim League aligned together; the Congress tricolour and the green flag of the League were flown together at protests. [114]

The Congress quickly came forward to defend soldiers of the INA who were to be court-martialled. [115] The INA Defence Committee was formed by the Indian Congress and included prominent Indian legal figures, among whom were Jawaharlal Nehru, Bhulabhai Desai, Kailashnath Katju and Asaf Ali. [114] The trials covered arguments based on military law, constitutional law, international law, and politics. Much of the initial defence was based on the argument that they should be treated as prisoners of war as they were not paid mercenaries but bona fide soldiers of a legal government – Bose's Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind. [116] Nehru argued that "however misinformed or otherwise they had been in their notion of patriotic duty towards their country", they recognized the free Indian state as their sovereign and not the British sovereign. [117] Peter Fay points out that at least one INA prisoner Burhan-ud-Din  a brother of the ruler of Chitral – may have deserved to be accused of torture, but his trial had been deferred on administrative grounds. [118] Those charged after the first celebrated courts-martial only faced trial for torture and murder or abetment of murder. Charges of treason were dropped for fear of inflaming public opinion. [119]

In spite of aggressive and widespread opposition to continuation of the court martial, it was completed. All three defendants were found guilty in many of the charges and sentenced to deportation for life. The sentence however was never carried out. Immense public pressure, demonstrations, and riots forced Claude Auchinleck to release all three defendants. Within three months, 11,000 soldiers of the INA were released after cashiering and forfeiture of pay and allowance. [12] [120] On the recommendation of Lord Mountbatten and with the agreement of Jawaharlal Nehru, former soldiers of the INA were not allowed to join the new Indian Armed Forces as a condition for independence. [121]

Post 1947

Within India, the INA continues to be an emotive and celebrated subject of discussion. [122] It continued to have a strong hold over the public psyche and the sentiments of the armed forces until as late as 1947. [123] It has been suggested that Shah Nawaz Khan was tasked with organising INA troops to train Congress volunteers at Jawaharlal Nehru's request in late 1946 and early 1947. After 1947, several members of the INA who were closely associated with Subhas Bose and with the INA trials were prominent in public life. [14] A number of them held important positions in independent India, serving as ambassadors immediately after independence: Abid Hasan in Egypt and Denmark, A. C. N. Nambiar in the Federal Republic of Germany, Mehboob Hasan in Canada, Cyril John Stracey in the Netherlands, and N. Raghavan in Switzerland. [124] Mohan Singh was elected to the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Indian Parliament. He worked for the recognition of the members of Indian National Army as "freedom fighters" in the cause of the nation's independence in and out of Parliament. [125] Shah Nawaz Khan served as Minister of State for Rail in the first Indian cabinet. [126] Lakshmi Sahgal, Minister for Women's Affairs in the Azad Hind government, was a well known and widely respected public figure in India. [127] In 1971, she joined the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and was later elected the leader of the All India Democratic Women's Association. [128] Joyce Lebra, an American historian, wrote that the rejuvenation of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, then a fledgling Tamil political party in southern India, would not have been possible without participation of INA members. [129]

Lakshmi Sahgal in later life, at a political meeting in India Lakshmi Sahgal.jpg
Lakshmi Sahgal in later life, at a political meeting in India

Some accounts suggest that the INA veterans were involved in training civilian resistance forces against the Nizam's Razakars prior to the execution of Operation Polo and annexation of Hyderabad. [130] There are also suggestions that some INA veterans led Pakistani irregulars during the First Kashmir war. Mohammed Zaman Kiani served as Pakistan's political agent to Gilgit in late 1950s. [124] [131] Of the very few ex-INA members who joined the Indian Armed Forces after 1947 R. S. Benegal, a member of the Tokyo Boys, joined the Indian Air Force in 1952 and later rose to be an air commodore. [132] Benegal saw action in both 1965 and Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, earning a Maha Vir Chakra, India's second highest award for valour. [133]

Among other prominent members of the INA, Ram Singh Thakur, composer of a number of songs including the INA's regimental march Kadam Kadam Badaye Ja, has been credited by some for the modern tune of the Indian national anthem. [134] Gurubaksh Singh Dhillon and Lakshmi Sahgal were later awarded theIndian civilian honours of Padma Bhushan and Padma Vibhushan respectively by the Indian Government in the 1990s. [135] [136] Lakshmi Sahgal was nominated for the Indian presidential election by communist parties in 2002. She was the sole opponent of A. P. J. Abdul Kalam, who emerged victorious. [137] Subhas Bose himself was posthumously awarded Bharat Ratna in 1992, but this was later withdrawn over the controversy over the circumstances of his death. [138]

Former INA recruits in diasporic Singapore however faced a different situation. In Singapore, Indians – particularly those who were associated with the INA – were treated with disdain as they were "stigmatized as fascists and Japanese collaborators". [139] [140] Some within this diaspora later emerged as notable political and social leaders. The consolidation of trade unions in the form of National Union of Plantation Workers was led by ex-INA leaders. [129] In Malaya, notable members of the INA were involved in founding the Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) in 1946; John Thivy was the founding president. [141] Janaky Athi Nahappan, second-in-command of the Rani of Jhansi Regiment, was also a founding member of the MIC and later became a noted welfare activist and a distinguished senator in the Dewan Negara of the Malaysian Parliament. Rasammah Bhupalan, also of the Rani of Jhansi Regiment, later became a well-known welfare-activist and a widely respected champion for women's rights in Malaysia. [142]


Japanese Army

The army's relationship to the Japanese was an uncomfortable one. Officers in the INA distrusted the Japanese. Leaders of the first INA sought formal assurances from Japan before committing to war. When these did not arrive, Mohan Singh resigned after ordering his army to disband; he expected to be sentenced to death. After Bose established Azad Hind, he tried to establish his political independence from the regime that supported him. (He had led protests against the Japanese expansion into China, and supported Chiang Kai-shek during the 1930s) Azad Hind depended on Japan for arms and materiel but sought to be as financially independent as possible, levying taxes and raising donations from Indians in Southeast Asia". [143] On the Japanese side, members of the high command had been personally impressed by Bose and were willing to grant him some latitude; more importantly, the Japanese were interested in maintaining the support of a man who had been able to mobilise large numbers of Indian expatriates – including, most importantly, 40-,000 of the 45,000 Indians captured by the Japanese at Singapore. [144] However, Faye notes that interactions between soldiers in the field was different. Attempts to use Shah Nawaz's troops in road building and as porters angered the troops, forcing Bose to intervene with Mutaguchi. After the withdrawal from Imphal, the relations between both junior non-commissioned officers and between senior officers had deteriorated. INA officers accused the Japanese Army high command of trying to deceive INA troops into fighting for Japan. Conversely, Japanese soldiers often expressed disdain for INA soldiers for having changed their oath of loyalty. This mutual dislike was especially strong after the withdrawal from Imphal began; Japanese soldiers, suspicious that INA defectors had been responsible for their defeat, addressed INA soldiers as "shameless one" instead of "comrade" as previously had been the case. [145] Azad Hind officials in Burma reported difficulties with the Japanese military administration in arranging supply for troops and transport for wounded men as the armies withdrew. Toye notes that local IIL members and Azad Hind Dal (local Azad Hind administrative teams) organised relief supplies from Indians in Burma at this time. As the situation in Burma became hopeless for the Japanese, Bose refused requests to use INA troops against Aung San's Burma National Army, which had turned against Japan and was now allied with Commonwealth forces. [146]

INA memorial in Singapore after demolition by British Indian Army sappers. Circa September 1945. Destruction of INA Memorial 1945.jpg
INA memorial in Singapore after demolition by British Indian Army sappers. Circa September 1945.

British-Indian Army

The first interaction of the INA with the British-Indian forces was during the months during the First Arakan offensive, between December 1942 and March 1943. The morale of Sepoys during this time was low and knowledge about the INA was minimal. The INA's special services agents led a successful operation during this time in encouraging the Indian troops to defect to the INA. By the end of March 1945, however, the Sepoys in the British-Indian Army were reinvigorated and perceived the men of the INA to be savage turncoats and cowards. Senior British officers in the Indian Army considered them "rabble". [109] Historians Christopher Bayly and Tim Harper mention that sepoys in field units shot captured or wounded INA men, relieving their British officers of the complex task of formulating a formal plan for captured men. [147] After Singapore was retaken, Mountbatten ordered the INA's war memorial to its fallen soldiers to be blown up. [148]

As the story of the INA unfolded in post-war India, the view of Indian soldiers on the INA – and on their own position during the war – also changed. [149] The Raj observed with increasing disquiet and unease the spread of pro-INA sympathies within the troops of the British-Indian forces. [105] In February 1946, while the trials were still going on, a general strike by ratings of the Royal Indian Navy rapidly deteriorated into a mutiny incorporating ships and shore establishments of the RIN throughout India. The mutineers raised slogans invoking Subhas Bose and the INA, demanding and end to the trials. The mutiny received widespread public support. [150] In some places in the British-Indian Army, non-commissioned Officers started ignoring orders from British superiors. In Madras and Pune British garrisons faced revolts from within the ranks of the British-Indian Army. These were suppressed by force. [150] [151] At the conclusion of the first trial, when the sentences of deportation were commuted, Fay records Claude Auchinleck as having sent a "personal and secret" letter to all senior British officers, explaining: [152]

... practically all are sure that any attempt to enforce the sentence would have led to chaos in the country at large, and probably to mutiny and dissension in the Army, culminating in its dissolution.


World War II

Fay concludes that the INA was not significant enough to beat the British-Indian Army by military strength. He also writes that the INA was aware of this and formulated its own strategy of avoiding set-piece battles, gathering local and popular support within India and instigating revolt within the British-Indian Army to overthrow the Raj. [9] Moreover, the Forward Bloc underground movement within India had been crushed well before the offensives opened in the Burma–Manipur theatre, depriving the army of any organised internal support. [13] However, despite its small numerical strength and lack of heavy weapons, its special services group played a significant part in halting the First Arakan Offensive while still under Mohan Singh's command. [153] The propaganda threat of the INA and lack of concrete intelligence on the unit early after the fall of Singapore made it a threat to Allied war plans in Southeast Asia, since it threatened to destroy the Sepoys' loyalty to a British-Indian Army that was demoralised from continuing defeats. [154] There were reports of INA operatives successfully infiltrating Commonwealth lines during the Offensive. This caused British intelligence to begin the "Jiffs" propaganda campaign and to create "Josh" groups to improve the morale and preserve the loyalty of the sepoys as consolidation began to prepare for the defence of Manipur. [155] [156] These measures included imposing a complete news ban on Bose and the INA that was not lifted until four days after the fall of Rangoon two years later. [157] [158]

During the Japanese U-Go offensive towards Manipur in 1944, the INA played a crucial (and successful) role in diversionary attacks in Arakan and in the Manipur Basin itself, where it fought alongside Mutaguchi's 15th Army. [159] INA forces protected the flanks of the assaulting Yamamoto force at a critical time as the latter attempted to take Imphal. [83] [160] During the Commonwealth Burma Campaign, the INA troops fought in the battles of Irrawaddy and Meiktilla, [161] supporting the Japanese offensive and tying down Commonwealth troops. [162] [163]

Indian independence

The first INA trial, which was held in public, became a rallying point for the independence movement from the autumn of 1945. [10] [13] [11] The release of INA prisoners and the suspension of the trials came to be the dominant political campaign, superseding the campaign for independence. [164] Christopher Bayly notes that the "INA was to become a much more powerful enemy of the British empire in defeat than it had been during its ill-fated triumphal march on Delhi." [147] The Viceroy's journal describes the autumn and winter of 1945–1946 as "The Edge of a Volcano". [13] The setting of the trial at Red Fort was taken by Indian public as a deliberate taunt by the British Raj over the vanquished INA, recalling the INA's battle cries of unfurling the Indian tricolour over the Red Fort. [109] Many compared the trials to that of Bahadur Shah Zafar, the last Mughal emperor tried in the same place after the failed 1857 uprising. [165] Support for the INA grew rapidly and their continued detention and news of impending trials was seen an affront to the movement for independence and to Indian identity itself. [166] It was further feared that the Congress would exploit the INA to gain mass support against the Raj and possibly start an armed struggle with weapons smuggled from Burma. [118] [167] Nehru was suspected of using INA men to train Congress volunteers. [118] The political effects of the INA trials were enormous and were felt around India as late as 1948, much to the chagrin of the Congress government in independent India, [123] [168] which feared that pro-INA sympathies could help alternative sources of power. [169]

Historians like Sumit Sarkar, Sugata Bose, Ayesha Jalal conclude that the INA trials and its after-effects brought a decisive shift in British policy towards independence Indian . [164] [170] Particularly disturbing was the overt and public support for the INA by the soldiers of the Indian Army and the mutinies. [164] [170] The Congress's rhetoric preceding the 1946 elections gave the Raj reasons to fear a revival of the Quit India Movement of 1942. [170] It was soon realised that the Indian Army could not be used to suppress such a movement as it had in 1942, principally because of nationalistic and political consciousness in the forces which was ascribed to the INA. [13] [171] Gandhi noted: [164]

... the whole nation has been roused, even the regular forces have been stirred into a new political consciousness and begun to think in terms of independence ...

Facing problems in the British mainland and unable to muster enough forces of collaboration or coercion, the Cabinet mission of 1946 was sent to negotiate the transfer of power. [172] Some historians cite Auchinleck's own assessment of the situation to suggest this shortened the Raj by at least fifteen to twenty years. [171] Clement Attlee, the British prime minister, reflecting on the factors that guided the British decision to relinquish the Raj in India, is said to have cited the effects of the INA and Bose's activities on the British-Indian Army and the Bombay Mutiny as being the most important. [173]

British colonies

After the war ended, the story of the INA and the Indian Legion was seen as so inflammatory that, fearing mass revolts and uprisings across its empire, the British Government forbade the BBC from broadcasting their story. [174] The use of Indian troops for the restoration of Dutch and French rule in Vietnam and Indonesia fed into the already growing resentment within the forces. [175] Indian troops sent to suppress Sukarno's agitations in Indonesia in 1946 rapidly identified with the nationalist sentiments in the previous Dutch colony. [172] The South East Asia Command reported growing sympathy for the INA and dislike of the Dutch. [176] There were similar pro-nationalist sentiments among Indian troops sent to Vietnam, Thailand and Burma. This led to the realisation by 1946 that the British-Indian Army, the bulwark of the policing force in the British colonies, could not be used as an instrument of British power. [177] INA-inspired strikes emerged throughout Britain's colonies in Southeast Asia. In January 1946, protests started at Royal Air Force bases in Karachi and spread rapidly to Singapore. This was followed by a full-scale mutiny by a British Army unit in Singapore. In British Malaya, men of the Parachute Regiment refused to obey orders from their officers. [178] Authors like Nilanjana Sengupta attribute these to a combination of dissatisfaction over pay and work conditions and conflicts of comradeship over the INA trials. [179] Former INA members in Malaya identified closely with the left-wing organisations in opposing British colonial authority. The majority of prominent left-wing union leaders in Malaya after the war were members of the INA. The activities of the trade unions in the newly established Tamil schools were particularly influential, leading to the establishment of an inspector system by the British to supervise the curriculum and teaching in these schools. [129] Joyce Lebra notes that the INA had a particularly strong unifying influence over ethnic Indians residing in Malaya. Lebra concludes that the experience of the INA was useful in challenging British authority in the post-war period in Malaya, and in improving the socio-economic conditions of the Indian community. [129]


British and Commonwealth troops viewed the recruits as traitors and Axis collaborators. [85] [180] [181] Almost 40,000 Indian soldiers in Malaya did not join the army and remained as PoWs. Many were sent to work in the Death Railway, suffered hardships and nearly 11,000 died under Japanese internment. [182] Many of them cited the oath of allegiance they had taken to the King among reasons not to join a Japanese-supported organisation, and regarded the recruits of the INA as traitors for having forsaken their oath. Commanders in the British-Indian Army like Wavell later highlighted the hardships this group of soldiers suffered, contrasting them with the troops of the INA. [182] Many British soldiers held the same opinion., [16] Hugh Toye and Peter Fay point out that the First INA consisted of a mix of recruits joining for various reasons, such as nationalistic leanings, Mohan Singh's appeals, personal ambition or to protect men under their own command from harm. [183] Fay notes some officers like Shah Nawaz Khan were opposed to Mohan Singh's ideas and tried to hinder what they considered a collaborationist organisation. [184] However, both historians note that Indian civilians and former INA soldiers all cite the tremendous influence of Subhas Bose and his appeal to patriotism  in rejuvenating the INA. Fay discusses the topic of loyalty of the INA soldiers, and highlights that in Shah Nawaz Khan's trial it was noted that officers of the INA warned their men the possibility of having to fight the Japanese after having fought the British, to prevent Japan exploiting post-war India. [155] [185] Carl Vadivella Belle suggested in 2014 that among the local Indians and ex-British-Indian Army volunteers in Malaya, there was a proportion who joined due to the threat of conscription as Japanese labour troops. Recruitment also offered local Indian labourers security from continual semi-starvation of the estates and served as a barrier against Japanese tyranny. [52]

INA troops were alleged to engage in or be complicit in torture of Allied and Indian prisoners of war. [15] Fay in his 1993 history analyses war-time press releases and field counter-intelligence directed at Sepoys. He concludes that the Jiffs campaign promoted the view that INA recruits were weak-willed and traitorous Axis collaborators, motivated by selfish interests of greed and personal gain. He concludes that the allegations of torture were largely products of the Jiffs campaign. [85] [186] [187] He supports his conclusion by noting that isolated cases of torture had occurred, but allegations of widespread practice of torture were not substantiated in the charges against defendants in the Red Fort trials. [188] [189] Published memoirs of several veterans, including that of William Slim, portray the INA troops as incapable fighters and as untrustworthy. [190] Toye noted in 1959 that individual desertions occurred in the withdrawal from Imphal. [191] Fay concluded that stories of INA desertions during the battle and the initial retreat into Burma were largely exaggerated. [192] The majority of desertions occurred much later, according to Fay, around the battles at Irrawaddy and later around Popa. Fay specifically discusses Slim's portrayal of the INA, pointing out what he concludes to be inconsistencies in Slim's accounts. [193] Fay also discusses memoirs of Shah Nawaz, where Khan claims INA troops were never defeated in battle. Fay criticises this too as exaggerated. He concludes the opinions held by Commonwealth war veterans such as Slim were an inaccurate portrayal of the unit, as were those of INA soldiers themselves. [187] Harkirat Singh notes that British officers' personal dislike for Subhas Chandra Bose may have prejudiced their judgement of the INA itself. [118]

In independent India, the treatment of former INA soldiers by government and omission of the INA and the Red Fort trials from historical records of the period leading up to Indian independence in 1947 have come in for criticisms. [194] Indian activists like Samar Guha, historians like Kapil Kumar, [194] as well as Indian parliamentarians [195] allege that official histories of the independence movement largely omit events surrounding the INA – especially the Red Fort trials and the Bombay Mutiny – and ignore their significance in rejuvenating the independence movement and guiding British decisions to relinquish the Raj. [17] [196] [197] A history of the army and of Azad Hind, written by Indian historian Pratul Chandra Gupta in 1950s at the request of the Indian Government, was subsequently classified and not released until 2006. [198] Further criticisms have been made in recent years over the denial till 1980s of the "freedom fighter's pension" awarded to those in the Gandhian movement, [199] and over the general hardships and apathy surrounding the conditions of former INA soldiers. [200] This includes, for example, the circumstances surrounding the death and funeral of Ram Singh Thakuri, the composer of the INA's anthem Quami tarana , kadam kadam badaye ja. These have been compounded by a number of conspiracy-theories and news reports in the past on agreements between the Indian political leadership to hand over its leader Subhas Chandra Bose as a war criminal if he was found to be alive. [201] [202] [203] The Indian government refused to declassify secret documents on Bose and the INA held in Indian archives for almost sixty years citing concerns of India's relations with foreign countries. This decision was revisited in October 2015 by Narendra Modi government. However, some files are said to have been destroyed altogether. [204] Later historians have argued that, given the political aim and nature of the entire Azad Hind movement and especially the Indian National Army, Nehru's aim may have been to prevent politicisation of the army and assert civilian authority over the military. [121]

More recent controversies have risen from limited declassified Indian documents that revealed that the Nehru government kept Subhas Bose's family under strict surveillance for more than twenty years after Indian independence. [197] [205] Further controversy relates to the fate of the Azad Hind fortune Bose is said to have been travelling with it during in his last known journey. The treasure, a considerable amount of gold ornaments and gems, is said to have been recovered from Bose's belongings following the fatal plane crash in Formosa that reportedly killed him. [206] Despite repeated warnings from Indian diplomats in Tokyo, Nehru is said to have disregarded allegations that men previously associated with Azad Hind misappropriated the funds for personal benefit. Some of these are said to have travelled to Japan repeatedly with the approval of Nehru government and were later given government roles implementing Nehru's political and economic agenda. [206] A very small portion of the alleged treasure was repatriated to India in the 1950s. [206]


The plaque erected by the National Heritage Board at Esplanade Park, marking the INA Monument site in Singapore Former Indian National Army Monument.JPG
The plaque erected by the National Heritage Board at Esplanade Park, marking the INA Monument site in Singapore
Postage stamps released by Indian National Army in display at Netaji Birth Place Museum, Cuttack Azad Hind stamps released by Indian National Army in display at Netaji Birth Place Museum, Cuttack, Odisha, India.jpg
Postage stamps released by Indian National Army in display at Netaji Birth Place Museum, Cuttack

The INA is memorialised in the Swatantrata Sainani Smarak, which is located at the Salimgarh Fort in Delhi, adjacent to the Red Fort. [207] [208] Its exhibits include the Indian National Army uniform worn by Colonel Prem Sahgal, riding boots and coat buttons of Colonel Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon and photographs of Subhas Chandra Bose. A separate gallery holds material and photographs from excavations carried out by the Archaeological Survey of India inside the fort in 1995. The Indian National Army Memorial at Moirang, Manipur, commemorates the place where the flag of Azad Hind was raised by Col. Shaukat Hayat Malik. Moirang was the first Indian territory captured by the INA. [79] [209]

The INA War Memorial at Singapore commemorating the "Unknown Warrior" of the INA was unveiled by Bose in July 1945. Situated at the Esplanade Park, it was destroyed on Mountbatten's orders when Allied troops reoccupied the city. In 1995, the National Heritage Board of Singapore, with financial donations from the Indian community in Singapore, erected the Former Indian National Army Monument at the site where the old memorial stood. The site is now officially one of the historical sites of Singapore. [210]

The INA's battle cry, Jai Hind , was declared the "national greeting" of India by Nehru and remains a popular nationalist greeting. [211] Today it is used by all Indian prime ministers to conclude their Independence Day speeches. [211] The cry became independent India's first commemorative post mark on 15 August 1947. [212] The first postage stamps issued by Independent India are called the Jai Hind series of stamps, showing the Indian flag with the letters Jai Hind in the top right hand corner. [212] These were a part of the series issued on 15 August 1947. [213] Commemorative postage stamps were also issued by the Indian government in 1968 and 1993 respectively to commemorate the 25th and the 50th anniversaries of the establishment of Azad Hind at Singapore. [214] The Department of Posts also includes the six unused Azad Hind stamps in its commemorative book India's Freedom Struggle through India Postage Stamps. [213] The Azad Hind Fauj Marg (Azad Hind Fauj Road) in New Delhi is named after the INA and houses the Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology. [215]

The Indian National Army remains a significant topic of discussion in the popular history of India; it is an emotive topic which has been the subject of numerous works of literature, art, and visual media within India and outside. Some of the earliest works in print media were created at the time of the INA trials. These include works of fiction like Jai Hind: The Diary of a Rebel Daughter of India published in 1945 by Amritlal Seth. The book, a work of fiction narrating the story of a recruit of the Rani of Jhansi Regiment, is believed to be loosely based on the story of Lakshmi Sahgal. [216] In later decades works by authors like Amitav Ghosh, such as his book The Glass Palace , have used the backdrop of the Azad Hind and the Japanese occupation of Burma for the narrative of the story. [217] The Day of the Scorpion and The Towers of Silence , the second and third books in Paul Scott's Raj Quartet , mention Jiffs in the political and social context in which the term found use in the Eastern Army during the war. The 1984 British TV series The Jewel in the Crown , based on Scott's quartet, also includes the role of the INA as part of the political backdrop of the story. [218]

In visual media, the INA has been the subject of a number of documentaries. The War of The Springing Tiger made by Granada Television for Channel 4 in 1984 examined the role of the Indian National Army in the Second World War, the motivation of its soldiers and explored its role in the independence movement. [219] [220] In 1999 Film India released a documentary, The Forgotten Army. Directed by Kabir Khan and produced by Akhil Bakshi, it followed what was called the Azad Hind Expedition between 1994 and 1995, retracing the route taken by the INA from Singapore to Imphal, before ending at Red Fort. Amongst the members of expedition team were Gurubaksh Singh Dhillon, Lakshmi Sahgal and Captain S.S. Yadava, an INA veteran and once the general secretary of the All India INA Committee. The documentary went on to win the Grand Jury Prize at the Film South Asia festival in 1999. [221] The National Archives of Singapore digitised its available resources in 2007 as Historical Journey of the Indian National Army. [222] In 2004, the Indian Legion in Europe was the subject of a BBC magazine article authored by Mike Thomson, but it did not attempt to distinguish the differences between the Legion and the INA. [174] The Hindustan Times , a large broadsheet in India, dedicates a part of its website to INA resources as Indian National Army in East Asia. [223]

Indian cinema has also seen a number of films in many different Indian languages, where the INA is a significant part of the narrative. These include Pahla Admi by Bimal Roy and Samadhi by Ramesh Saigal, both produced in 1950 based on fictional INA veterans. [224] [225] More recently, Indian , a 1996 Tamil film directed by S. Shankar, incorporates a lead character in its story who is a veteran of the INA. Shyam Benegal produced Netaji: The Forgotten Hero in 2004, which traces the last five years of Subhas Chandra Bose. Benegal describes the story of the INA in small details in his film whilst focusing on its leader. [225] The film was also widely noted for A. R. Rahman's music. The INA's marching song, Kadam Kadam Badaye Ja, has since become a famous patriotic song in India. Today it is in use as the regimental quick march of the Indian Parachute regiment. [226] More recently, a 2017 Hindi movie Rangoon, starring Kangna Ranaut, Saif Ali Khan, Shahid Kapoor is based against the backdrop of the INA presence in Rangoon, with the movie centered around the protagonists trying to get across a jeweled sword to the INA. In 2020 Amazon Prime Video released a five-part series called The Forgotten Army - Azaadi Ke Liye! Which tells the story of the INA through the eyes of one of its Captains and the woman he loves.

See also

Related Research Articles

Subhas Chandra Bose 20th-century Indian nationalist leader and politician

Subhas Chandra Bose was an Indian nationalist whose defiant patriotism made him a hero in India, but whose attempt during World War II to rid India of British rule with the help of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan left a troubled legacy. The honorific Netaji, first applied in early 1942 to Bose in Germany by the Indian soldiers of the Indische Legion and by the German and Indian officials in the Special Bureau for India in Berlin, was later used throughout India.

India in World War II

During the Second World War (1939–1945), India was controlled by the United Kingdom, with the British holding territories in India including over five hundred autonomous Princely States; British India officially declared war on Nazi Germany in September 1939. The British Raj, as part of the Allied Nations, sent over two and a half million soldiers to fight under British command against the Axis powers. The British government borrowed billions of pounds to help finance the war. India also provided the base for American operations in support of China in the China Burma India Theater.

Azad Hind provisional government established by Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose during World War II

The Provisional Government of Free India, or, more simply, Azad Hind, was an Indian provisional government established in occupied Singapore during World War II. It was created in October 1943 and supported by–as well as largely dependent on–the Empire of Japan.

Indian Legion Indian volunteer unit in Nazi Germany

The Indian Legion, officially the Free India Legion or Infantry Regiment 950 (Indian) and later the Indian Volunteer Legion of the Waffen-SS, was a military unit raised during the Second World War. Intended to serve as a liberation force for British-ruled India, it was made up of Indian prisoners of war and expatriates in Europe. Because of its origins in the Indian independence movement, it was known also as the "Tiger Legion", and the "Azad Hind Fauj". Initially raised as part of the German Army, it was officially assigned to the Waffen-SS from August 1944. Indian independence leader Subhas Chandra Bose initiated the legion's formation, as part of his efforts to win India's independence by waging war against Britain, when he came to Berlin in 1941 seeking German aid. The initial recruits in 1941 were volunteers from the Indian students resident in Germany at the time, and a handful of the Indian prisoners of war who had been captured during the North Africa Campaign. It would later draw a larger number of Indian prisoners of war as volunteers.

Shah Nawaz Khan (general) Army General and Member of parliament

Shah Nawaz Khan was an Indian politician who served as an officer in the Indian National Army during World War II. After the war, he was tried, convicted for treason, and sentenced to death in a public court-martial carried out by the British Indian Army. The sentence was commuted by the Commander-in-chief of the Indian Army following unrest and protests in India.

Mohan Singh (general) Indian politician and military general

Mohan Singh was an Indian military officer and member of the Indian Independence Movement best known for his role in organising and leading the First Indian National Army in South East Asia during World War II. Following Indian independence, Mohan Singh later served in public life as a Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha of the Indian Parliament.

The Indian Independence League was a political organisation operated from the 1920s to the 1940s to organise those living outside India into seeking the removal of British colonial rule over India. Founded in 1928 by Indian nationalists, the organisation was located in various parts of Southeast Asia and included Indian expatriates, and later, Indian nationalists in-exile under Japanese occupation following Japan's successful Malayan Campaign during the first part of the Second World War. During the Japanese Occupation in Malaya, the Japanese encouraged Indians in Malaya to join the Indian Independence League.

Indian National Army trials The British Indian trial by courts-martial of a number of officers of the Indian National Army (INA) between November 1945 and May 1946

The Indian National Army trials, which are also called the Red Fort trials, were the British Indian trial by courts-martial of a number of officers of the Indian National Army (INA) between November 1945 and May 1946, for charges variously for treason, torture, murder and abetment to murder during World War II. The first, and most famous, of the approximately ten trials held in the Red Fort in Delhi. In total, approximately ten courts-martial were held. The first of these, and the most celebrated one, was the joint court-martial of Colonel Prem Sahgal, Colonel Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon, and Major General Shah Nawaz Khan. The three had been officers in the British Indian Army and were taken as prisoners of war in Malaya, Singapore and Burma. They had, like a large number of other troops and officers of the British Indian Army, joined the Indian National Army and later fought in Imphal and Burma alongside the Japanese forces in allegiance to Azad Hind. These three came to be the only defendants in the INA trials who were charged with "waging war against the King-Emperor" as well as murder and abetment of murder. Those charged later only faced trial for torture and murder or abetment of murder. The trials covered arguments based on Military Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, and Politics. These trials attracted much publicity, and public sympathy for the defendants who were considered patriots of India and fought for the freedom of India from the British Empire. Outcry over the grounds of the trial, as well as a general emerging unease and unrest within the troops of the Raj, ultimately forced the then Army Chief Field Marshal Claude Auchinleck to commute the sentences of the three defendants in the first trial.

Rani of Jhansi Regiment womens regiment of the Indian National Army

The Rani of Jhansi Regiment was the Women's Regiment of the Indian National Army, the armed force formed by Indian nationalists in 1942 in Southeast Asia with the aim of overthrowing the British Raj in colonial India, with Japanese assistance. It was one of the very few all-female combat regiments of the Second World War on any side. Led by Captain Lakshmi Swaminathan, the unit was raised in July 1943 with volunteers from the expatriate Indian population in South East Asia. The unit was named the Rani of Jhansi Regiment after Lakshmibai, Rani of Jhansi.

Major General Arcot Doraiswamy Loganadan was an officer of the Indian National Army, and a minister in the Azad Hind Government as a representative of the Indian National Army. He also served briefly as the Azad Hind Governor for the Andaman islands and Burma.

S. A. Ayer Minister in Azad Hind Government

Subbier Appadurai Ayer was the Minister for Publicity and Propaganda in Subhas Chandra Bose's Azad Hind Government between 1943 and 1945, and later a key defence witness during the first of the INA trials. Ayer had travelled to Bangkok in November 1940 as a Special correspondent for Reuters before joining the Indian Independence League. In October 1943, Ayer was appointed the Minister of publicity and propaganda in the nascent Azad Hind Government.

Jiffs was a pejorative term used by British Intelligence, and later the 14th Army, to denote soldiers of the Indian National Army after the failed First Arakan offensive of 1943. The term is derived from the acronym JIFC, short for Japanese-Indian fifth column. It came to be employed in a propaganda offensive in June 1943 within the British Indian Army as a part of the efforts to preserve the loyalty of the Indian troops at Manipur after suffering desertion and losses at Burma during the First Arakan Offensive. After the end of the war, the term "HIFFs" was also used for repatriated troops of the Indian Legion awaiting trial.

The First Indian National Army was the Indian National Army as it existed between February and December 1942. It was formed with Japanese aid and support after the Fall of Singapore and consisted of approximately 12,000 of the 40,000 Indian prisoners of war who were captured either during the Malayan campaign or surrendered at Singapore and was led by Rash Behari Bose. It was formally proclaimed in April 1942 and declared the subordinate military wing of the Indian Independence League in June that year. The unit was dissolved in December 1942 after apprehensions of Japanese motives with regards to the INA led to disagreements and distrust between Mohan Singh and INA leadership on one hand, and the League's leadership, most notably Rash Behari Bose.Rash Behari Bose handed over Indian National Army to Subhas Chandra Bose. A large number of the INAs initial volunteers, however, later went on to join the INA in its second incarnation under Subhas Chandra Bose.

The Farrer Park address was an assembly of the surrendered Indian troops of the British Indian Army held at Farrer Park in Singapore on 17 February 1942, two days after the Fall of Singapore. The assembly was marked by a series of three addresses in which the British Malaya Command formally surrendered the Indian troops of the British Indian Army to Major Fujiwara Iwaichi representing the Japanese military authority, followed by transfer of authority by Fujiwara to the command of Mohan Singh, and a subsequent address by Mohan Singh to the gathered troops declaring the formation of the Indian National Army to fight the Raj, asking for volunteers to join the army.

The Battles and Operations involving the Indian National Army during World War II were all fought in the South-East Asian theatre. These range from the earliest deployments of the INA's preceding units in espionage during Malayan Campaign in 1942, through the more substantial commitments during the Japanese Ha Go and U Go offensives in the Upper Burma and Manipur region, to the defensive battles during the Allied Burma Campaign. The INA's brother unit in Europe, the Indische Legion did not see any substantial deployment although some were engaged in Atlantic wall duties, special operations in Persia and Afghanistan, and later a small deployment in Italy. The INA was not considered a significant military threat. However, it was deemed a significant strategic threat especially to the Indian Army, with Wavell describing it as a target of prime importance.

The integral associations of the Indian National Army's history with that of the war in South East Asia, especially the Japanese occupation of South East Asian countries, the renunciations of the oath to the King, as well as war-time propaganda and later allegations of torture by INA soldiers have inspired a number of controversies. Principal among these is the Intelligence propaganda during the war implied alleged torture at a massive scale of Indian and Allied prisoners of war by the INA troops in collaboration with the Japanese.

The Indian National Army (INA) and its leader Subhash Chandra Bose are popular and emotive topics within India. From the time it came into public perception in India around the time of the Red Fort Trials, it found its way into the works of military historians around the world. It has been the subject of a number of projects, of academic, historical and of popular nature. Some of these are critical of the army, some — especially of the ex-INA men — are biographical or autobiographical, while still others historical and political works, that tell the story of the INA. A large number of these provide analyses of Subhas Chandra Bose and his work with the INA.

The Combined Services Detailed Interrogation Centre (India), or CSDIC (I) for short, was the Indian branch of the CSDIC, established during World War II. Established along with the parent section at the start of hostilities in Europe, the branch developed as an important tool for interrogation of enemy troops and informant from November 1942, when the first information emerged of the nascent Indian National Army. The organisation formed a part of the Jiffs campaign, and was initially tasked with identifying Indian troops at risk of defecting to the INA. By the end of the war its task had evolved into interrogating INA soldiers captured in Burma, Malaya and Europe, interrogating them regardless of rank and identifying soldiers as whitegrey or black on the basis of their commitment to Subhas Chandra Bose and Azad Hind. The classifications were to be important in rehabilitating INA soldiers into the British-Indian Army. Col. Hugh Toye, who worked with the unit, later went on to pen the first substantive history on the INA in his book 1959 book The Springing Tiger.

<i>The Springing Tiger</i> book by Hugh Toye

The Springing Tiger is a historical account of the Indian National Army published in 1959 by Col Hugh Toye. The book was published in London by Cassell Publishers, and is considered one of the first Sympathetic Western accounts of the army. Toye worked as an intelligence officer in World War II in Burma, and was tasked with interrogating captured soldiers of the INA by the CSDIC(I). The book is provided with a foreword by Phillip Mason, who in 1946 was the Secretary of the War department in India. The book describes in detail the formation of the INA under the auspices of the F Kikan of Japanese intelligence through the collapse and subsequent revival of the army under Subhas Chandra Bose, its role in the Battles of Imphal and Kohima and the subsequent collapse in the face of Allied Burmese offensive before ending with the alleged death of Subhas Chandra Bose.

The Indian National Army (INA) was an Indian military wing in Southeast Asia, particularly active in Singapore, that was officially formed in April 1942 and disbanded in August 1945. It was formed with the help of the Japanese forces and was made up of roughly about 45 000 Indian POWs, who were captured after the fall of Singapore on 15 February 1942. It was initially headed by Mohan Singh till April 1942. Following disagreements between Mohan Singh and other leaders of the INA, the responsibility of leadership fell to Subhas Chandra Bose in 1943.


  1. Fay 1993 , p. viii
  2. Lebra 2008 , Foreword, pp. viii–x
  3. 1 2 Lebra 2008 , p. 99
  4. Fay 1993 , pp. 212–213
  5. 1 2 Lebra 2008 , p. xv
  6. 1 2 Fay 1993 , pp. 283–284
  7. 1 2 Fay 1993 , p. 330
  8. Fay 1993 , p. 423
  9. 1 2 Fay 1993 , p. 138
  10. 1 2 Sarkar 1983 , p. 420
  11. 1 2 Fay 1993 , pp. 496, 498–499
  12. 1 2 3 Chaudhuri 1953 , p. 349
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 Sarkar 1983 , p. 411
  14. 1 2 3 Lebra 2008 , p. 107
  15. 1 2 Fay 1993 , pp. 423–424,453
  16. 1 2 3 4 Toye 1959 , Mason, in Foreword, p. xiv
  17. 1 2 Cohen 1971 , p. 132
  18. Fay 1993 , p. 228
  19. Lebra 1977 , p. 23
  20. 1 2 3 Lebra 1977 , p. 24
  21. Fay 1993 , p. 75
  22. 1 2 Toye 2007 , p. 4
  23. Fay 1993 , pp. 56, 224, 226
  24. Toye 1959 , p. 30
  25. Toye 1959 , p. 7,8
  26. Fay 1993 , pp. 91, 108
  27. Fay 1993 , p. 108
  28. Lebra 2008 , p. 77
  29. Fay 1993 , p. 94
  30. Fay 1993 , p. 111
  31. Lebra 2008 , p. 49
  32. Fay 1993 , p. 150
  33. 1 2 Toye 1959 , p. 45
  34. Fay 1993 , p. 149
  35. 1 2 Fay 1993 , p. 151
  36. "MZ kiani". World News. Retrieved 12 August 2011.
  37. Lebra 2008 , p. 98
  38. 1 2 Toye 2007 , p. 2
  39. Lebra 1977 , p. 27
  40. Toye 1959 , p. 80
  41. 1 2 3 4 Toye 2007 , The Rebel President
  42. Sengupta 2012 , pp. 23–24
  43. 1 2 Toye 1959 , p. 88
  44. Fay 1993 , p. 197
  45. "Subhas Chandra Bose in Nazi Germany". Sisir K. Majumdar. South Asia Forum Quarterly. 1997. pp. 10–14. Retrieved 12 August 2011.
  46. Tojo 1943
  47. Toye 1959 , pp. 117–119
  48. Lebra 2008 , p. 231
  49. "Total Mobilisation". National Archives of Singapore. Retrieved 12 August 2011.
  50. Fay 1993 , p. 223
  51. "Subhas Chandra Bose: 10 things you should definitely know about the legend". India Today. 23 January 2015. Retrieved 24 October 2015.
  52. 1 2 3 4 Belle 2014 , p. 199
  53. "Historical Journey of the Indian National Army". National Archives of Singapore. Retrieved 7 July 2007.
  54. Toye 1959 , p. 286
  55. Sareen 1986 , p. 125
  56. Fay 1993 , p. 556
  57. Fay 1993 , p. 263
  58. Toye 1959 , p. 138
  59. Gordon 1990 , p. 496
  60. Fay 1993 , p. 297
  61. Fay 1993 , p. 317
  62. Fay 1993 , p. 318
  63. Fay 1993 , pp. 525–526
  64. Bayly & Harper 2005 , p. 322
  65. Fay 1993 , p. 236
  66. Toye 1959 , 80,90-93
  67. Singh 2003 , p. 16
  68. 1 2 Toye 1959 , p. 86
  69. Toye 1959 , p. 149
  70. Fay 1993 , pp. 292, 298
  71. Fay 1993 , p. 139
  72. Fay 1993 , p. 268
  73. Fay 1993 , p. 262
  74. 1 2 Toye 1959 , p. 161
  75. Toye 1959 , p. 159
  76. Toye 1959 , p. 162
  77. Sareen 1996 , p. 184
  78. van Der Bijil 2013 , p. 112
  79. 1 2 Toye 1959 , pp. 198, 215
  80. Toye 1959 , pp. 189–191
  81. Fay 1993 , pp. 289–292
  82. Toye 1959 , pp. 138, 162, 203, 210
  83. 1 2 Toye 1959 , p. 207
  84. Toye 1959 , p. 180
  85. 1 2 3 Fay 1993 , p. 417
  86. 1 2 Fay 1993 , p. 539
  87. Fay 1993 , p. 358
  88. Toye 1959 , p. 229
  89. Singh 2003 , pp. 32–33
  90. Toye 1959 , p. 261
  91. Belle 2014 , p. 204
  92. 1 2 Toye 1959 , p. 248
  93. Bose 2013 , p. undefined
  94. Fay 1993 , pp. 372–373
  95. Fay 1993 , p. 384
  96. Bose 2006 , p. 143
  97. 1 2 3 4 Fay 1993 , p. 436
  98. Lebra 2008 , p. 200
  99. Fay 1993 , p. 459
  100. 1 2 Singh 2003 , p. 38
  101. Singh 2003 , p. 39
  102. Singh 2003 , p. 44,45
  103. "Many INA already executed". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 9 August 2007. Retrieved 2 September 2007.
  104. Chaudhuri 1953 , p. 351
  105. 1 2 Sarkar 1983 , p. 419
  106. Fay 1993 , p. 499
  107. 1 2 Singh 2003 , pp. 39–40
  108. Singh 2003 , pp. 42–43
  109. 1 2 3 Toye 1959 , Mason, in foreword p. xix
  110. Toye 1959 , Mason, in foreword, p. xviii
  111. Singh 2003 , p. 74
  112. Chaudhuri 1953 , p. 1
  113. Singh 2003 , p. 79
  114. 1 2 Sengupta 2012 , p. 77
  115. Singh 2003 , p. 44
  116. Fay 1993 , pp. 79–80
  117. Cohen 1963 , pp. 411–429
  118. 1 2 3 4 Singh 2003 , p. 41
  119. Fay 1993 , p. 497
  120. Childs 2000 , p. 28
  121. 1 2 Ganguly, Sumit. "Explaining India's Transition to Democracy". Columbia University Press. Retrieved 3 September 2007.
  122. Lebra 2008b , p. 107
  123. 1 2 Green 1948 , p. 68
  124. 1 2 Gordon 1990 , p. 369
  125. Lebra 1971 , p. 243
  126. Ram 2010 , p. 197
  127. Lebra 2008b , p. xii
  128. Forbes 1999 , p. 276
  129. 1 2 3 4 Lebra 2008b , p. 111
  130. Menon, P. "The States". The Hindu. Retrieved 3 September 2007.
  131. "Taj Muhammad Khanzada. Legislators from Attock". Provisional Assembly of The Punjab (Lahore-Pakistan). Govt of Pakistan. Archived from the original on 1 November 2007. Retrieved 19 September 2007.
  132. Benegal 2013 , Foreword
  133. "Air Commodore Ramesh Sakharam Benegal". Bharat Rakshak. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
  134. "Who composed the score for Jana Gana Mana? Gurudev or the Gorkha?". Rediff on the net. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
  135. Raman 2009 , p. 176
  136. Gandhi 2007 , p. 392
  137. Kochanek & Hardgrave 2007 , p. 74
  138. "Why was the Bharat Ratna Award given to Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose withdrawn by the Supreme Court in 1992?". Times of India. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
  139. Sengupta 2012 , p. 149
  140. Stenson 2011 , p. 106
  141. Ooi 2004 , p. 136
  142. Lebra 2008b , p. 103
  143. Belle 2014 , p. 200
  144. "Capture of INA" (Press release). Retrieved 12 August 2011.
  145. Toye 1959 , p. 203
  146. Toye 1959 , p. 231
  147. 1 2 Marston 2014 , p. 118
  148. Fay 1993 , p. 523
  149. Edwards 1963 , p. 93
  150. 1 2 James 2000 , p. 598
  151. James 2000 , p. 596
  152. Fay 1993 , p. 517
  153. Bayly & Harper 2005 , p. 273
  154. Fay 1993 , p. 410
  155. 1 2 Aldrich 2000 , p. 163
  156. Aldrich 2000 , p. 159
  157. Fay 1993 , p. 218
  158. Sareen 2004 , p. 40
  159. Fay 1993 , p. 289
  160. Toye 1959 , p. 210
  161. Fay 1993 , pp. 316–317
  162. Fay 1993 , pp. 332–333
  163. Slim 1961 , p. 425
  164. 1 2 3 4 Bose & Jalal 2004 , p. 134
  165. Fay 1993 , p. 472
  166. Singh 2003 , p. 99
  167. Marston 2014 , p. 129
  168. Green 1948 , p. 54
  169. James 2000 , pp. 596–598
  170. 1 2 3 Sarkar 1983 , p. 412
  171. 1 2 Hyam 2007 , p. 106
  172. 1 2 Sengupta 2012 , p. 84
  173. Bhat D. "RIN mutiny gave a jolt to the British". The Tribune. Retrieved 2 September 2007.
  174. 1 2 Thomson M (23 September 2004). "Hitler's secret Indian Army". BBC. Retrieved 2 September 2007.Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  175. McMillan 2006 , p. 155
  176. Sengupta 2012 , pp. 83–84
  177. Sengupta 2012 , p. 85
  178. Sengupta 2012 , p. 82
  179. Sengupta 2012 , p. 83
  180. Fay 1993 , pp. 547
  181. Fay 1993 , p. 5
  182. 1 2 Menon 1997 , p. 225
  183. Fay 1993 , p. 207
  184. Fay 1993 , pp. 87–100
  185. Fay 1993 , pp. 461–463
  186. Fay 1993 , p. 426
  187. 1 2 Fay 1993 , pp. 290–292
  188. Fay 1993 , p. 427
  189. Fay 1993 , p. 461
  190. Fay 1993 , pp. 293
  191. Toye 1959 , pp. 203
  192. Fay 1993 , pp. 290–293
  193. Fay 1993 , pp. 289–291
  194. 1 2 Kumar, Navtan (18 April 2015). "Sarkari historians ignored the INA". Sunday Guardian. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  195. Lok Sabha 1993 , p. 609
  196. Shaikh, Sajid (6 October 2001). "INA's soldier lives in oblivion in Vadodara". Times of India. Retrieved 7 July 2007.
  197. 1 2 Sandeep Unnithan. "Jawaharlal Nehru spied on Subhas Chandra Bose's family for 20 years". India Today. Retrieved 19 September 2015.
  198. Roy, Saugata (17 April 2015). "Netaji became my guiding light, my only inspiration". Times of India. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
  199. Kunju 1998 , p. 6
  200. Pratibha Chauhan. "INA hero gets shabby treatment". Tribune News Service. Retrieved 2 September 2007.
  201. "Radhakrishnan met Netaji in Moscow, says witness". Hindustan Times. 17 November 1970. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 2 September 2007.
  202. "Gandhi, others had agreed to hand over Netaji". Hindustan Times. 23 January 1971. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 2 September 2007.
  203. Shahira Naim. "The Bose I knew is a memory now — Lakshmi Sahgal". The Tribune. Retrieved 2 September 2007.
  204. Niyogi, Subhro; Sinha, Arunav. "Was Netaji alive till 1964?". Times of India. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  205. Himanshi Dhawan. "Papers reveal Jawarharlal Nehru's hand in snooping on Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose's kin". Times of India. Retrieved 19 September 2015.
  206. 1 2 3 Kavitha Muralidharan. "Who shrunk Netaji's fortune?". India Today. Retrieved 19 September 2015.
  207. Mehta 2006 , p. 272
  208. "On I-Day eve, India forgets INA memorial". Rose India. Retrieved 12 August 2011.
  209. "Heritage Sites and Trails in Singapore". National Heritage Board of Singapore. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 7 July 2007.
  210. "Indian National Army Martyrs' Memorial Complex". Indian National Army (I.N.A.) Martyrs' Memorial Complex. Archived from the original on 30 November 2018. Retrieved 15 August 2017.
  211. 1 2 Desai 2011
  212. 1 2 Ashok Kumar Bayanwala. "Art in miniature". Stamps of india. Archived from the original on 28 September 2011. Retrieved 11 August 2011.
  213. 1 2 Bhaskaran, S.T. (16 December 2000). "Footprints of history". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Retrieved 16 October 2007.
  214. Healey, Beth (3 December 1989). "Pastimes; Stamps". New York Times. Retrieved 16 October 2007.
  215. Mayank Verma. "Sulahkul Vihar residents await development". Deccan Herald. Retrieved 11 August 2011.
  216. Forbes 1999 , p. 214
  217. Urquhart, James (7 August 2000). "Monday Book: A 'Doctor Zhivago' for the Far East — Review of The Glass Palace". The Independent.
  218. Fay 1993 , p. 4
  219. Fay 1993 , p. ix
  220. "Synopses The War of The Springing Tiger". British Film Institute. Retrieved 9 July 2007.
  221. Dutt, Nirupama. "A forgotten army marches again". Indian Express. Archived from the original on 26 September 2007. Retrieved 7 July 2007.
  222. "Historical Journey of the Indian National Army". National Archives of Singapore. Retrieved 7 July 2007.
  223. Das Sitanshu. "Indian National Army in East Asia". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 2 July 2007. Retrieved 7 July 2007.
  224. Bose 2006 , p. 146
  225. 1 2 Dhawan, M.L. "Freedom struggle through Hindi films". The Tribune. Retrieved 9 July 2007.
  226. Gaur 2006 , p. 185

Further reading