Jōmon period

Last updated
Reconstruction of the Sannai-Maruyama Site in the Aomori Prefecture. The site shares cultural similarities with settlements of Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula and also with later Japanese culture, pointing to continuity between ancient and modern Japanese culture. 140913 Sannai-Maruyama site Aomori Japan01bs6bs6.jpg
Reconstruction of the Sannai-Maruyama Site in the Aomori Prefecture. The site shares cultural similarities with settlements of Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula and also with later Japanese culture, pointing to continuity between ancient and modern Japanese culture.

The Jōmon period ( 縄文 時代 , Jōmon jidai) is the time in Japanese prehistory, traditionally dated between c.  14,000–300 BCE, [1] [2] [3] during which Japan was inhabited by a diverse hunter-gatherer and early agriculturalist population united through a common Jōmon culture, which reached a considerable degree of sedentism and cultural complexity. The name "cord-marked" was first applied by the American zoologist and orientalist Edward S. Morse, who discovered sherds of pottery in 1877 and subsequently translated it into Japanese as Jōmon. [4] The pottery style characteristic of the first phases of Jōmon culture was decorated by impressing cords into the surface of wet clay and is generally accepted to be among the oldest in the world. [5]


The Jōmon period was rich in tools and jewelry made from bone, stone, shell and antler; pottery figurines and vessels; and lacquerware. [6] [7] [8] [9] It is often compared to pre-Columbian cultures of the North American Pacific Northwest and especially to the Valdivia culture in Ecuador because in these settings cultural complexity developed within a primarily hunting-gathering context with limited use of horticulture. [10] [11] [12] [13]


The approximately 14,000 year Jōmon period is conventionally divided into several phases: Incipient (13,750-8,500 BCE), Initial (8,500–5,000), Early (5,000–3,520), Middle (3,520–2,470), Late (2,470–1,250), and Final (1,250–500), with each phase progressively shorter than the prior phase. [14] The fact that this entire period is given the same name by archaeologists should not be taken to mean that there was not considerable regional and temporal diversity; the time between the earliest Jōmon pottery and that of the more well-known Middle Jōmon period is about twice as long as the span separating the building of the Great Pyramid of Giza from the 21st century.

Dating of the Jōmon sub-phases is based primarily upon ceramic typology, and to a lesser extent radiocarbon dating.

Recent findings have refined the final phase of the Jōmon period to 300 BCE. [1] [2] [3] The Yayoi period started between 500 and 300 BCE according to radio-carbon evidence, while Yayoi styled pottery was found in a Jōmon site of northern Kyushu already in 800 BCE. [15] [16] [17]


Incipient Jomon pottery (14th-8th millennium BCE) Tokyo National Museum, Japan JomonPottery.JPG
Incipient Jōmon pottery (14th–8th millennium BCE) Tokyo National Museum, Japan

The earliest pottery in Japan was made at or before the start of the Incipient Jōmon period. Small fragments, dated to 14 500 BCE, were found at the Odai Yamamoto I site in 1998. Pottery of roughly the same age was subsequently found at other sites such as in Kamikuroiwa and the Fukui Cave. [18] [19] [20]

Jomon pottery in the Yamanashi museum. Museums in Yamanashi prefecture-4b.jpg
Jōmon pottery in the Yamanashi museum.

Archaeologist Junko Habu claims "[t]he majority of Japanese scholars believed, and still believe, that pottery production was first invented in mainland Asia and subsequently introduced into the Japanese archipelago." [20] This seems to be confirmed by recent archaeology. As of now, the earliest pottery vessels in the world date back to 20 000 BP and were discovered in Xianren Cave in Jiangxi, China. [21] [22] The pottery may have been used as cookware. [21] Other early pottery vessels include those excavated from the Yuchanyan Cave in southern China, dated from 16 000 BCE, [23] and at present it appears that pottery emerged at roughly the same time in Japan, and in the Amur River basin of the Russian Far East. [24] [25]

The first Jōmon pottery is characterized by the cord-marking that gives the period its name and has now been found in large numbers of sites. [26] The pottery of the period has been classified by archaeologists into some 70 styles, with many more local varieties of the styles. [4] The antiquity of Jōmon pottery was first identified after World War II, through radiocarbon dating methods. [7] [lower-alpha 1] The earliest vessels were mostly smallish round-bottomed bowls 10–50 cm high that are assumed to have been used for boiling food and, perhaps, storing it beforehand. They belonged to hunter-gatherers and the size of the vessels may have been limited by a need for portability. As later bowls increase in size, this is taken to be a sign of an increasingly settled pattern of living. These types continued to develop, with increasingly elaborate patterns of decoration, undulating rims, and flat bottoms so that they could stand on a surface. [27]

Spray style Jomon pottery JapaneseJomonPottery SprayStyle.jpg
Spray style Jōmon pottery

The manufacture of pottery typically implies some form of sedentary life because pottery is heavy, bulky, and fragile and thus generally unusable for hunter-gatherers. However, this does not seem to have been the case with the first Jōmon people, who perhaps numbered 20 000 individuals over the whole archipelago. [18] It seems that food sources were so abundant in the natural environment of the Japanese islands that it could support fairly large, semi-sedentary populations. The Jōmon people used chipped stone tools, ground stone tools, traps, and bows, and were evidently skillful coastal and deep-water fishermen.

Chronological ceramic typology

Incipient Jōmon (14 000–7 500 BCE)

Initial Jōmon (7500–4000 BCE)

Incipient and Initial Jōmon (13 750–5 000 BCE)

The Japanese archipelago, during the last glaciation in about 20,000BC. Japan glaciation.png
The Japanese archipelago, during the last glaciation in about 20,000BC.

Traces of Paleolithic culture, mainly stone tools, occur in Japan from around 30 000 BP onwards. [2] The earliest "Incipient Jōmon" phase began while Japan was still linked to continental Asia as a narrow peninsula. [18] As the glaciers melted following the end of the last glacial period (approximately 12 000 BP ), sea levels rose, separating the Japanese archipelago from the Asian mainland; the closest point (in Kyushu) about 190 kilometres (120 mi) from the Korean Peninsula is near enough to be intermittently influenced by continental developments, but far enough removed for the peoples of the Japanese islands to develop independently. The main connection between the Japanese archipelago and Mainland Asia was through the Korean Peninsula to Kyushu and Honshu. In addition, Luzon, Taiwan, Ryukyu, and Kyushu constitute a continuous chain of islands, connecting the Jōmon with Southeast Asia, while Honshu, Hokkaido and Sakhalin connected the Jōmon with Siberia.

Within the archipelago, the vegetation was transformed by the end of the Ice Age. In southwestern Honshu, Shikoku, and Kyushu, broadleaf evergreen trees dominated the forests, whereas broadleaf deciduous trees and conifers were common in northeastern Honshu and southern Hokkaido. Many native tree species, such as beeches, buckeyes, chestnuts, and oaks produced edible nuts and acorns. These provided substantial sources of food for both humans and animals.

In the northeast, the plentiful marine life carried south by the Oyashio Current, especially salmon, was another major food source. Settlements along both the Sea of Japan and the Pacific Ocean subsisted on immense amounts of shellfish, leaving distinctive middens (mounds of discarded shells and other refuse) that are now prized sources of information for archaeologists. Other food sources meriting special mention include Sika deer, wild boar (with possible wild-pig management [28] ), wild plants such as yam-like tubers, and freshwater fish. Supported by the highly productive deciduous forests and an abundance of seafood, the population was concentrated in Honshu and Kyushu, but Jōmon sites range from Hokkaido to the Ryukyu Islands.

Early Jōmon (5000–3520 BCE)

The Early Jōmon period saw an explosion in population, as indicated by the number of larger aggregated villages from this period. [14] This period occurred during the Holocene climatic optimum, when the local climate became warmer and more humid. [29]

Early agriculture

Azuki bean cultivation was common in southern Jomon period Japan and also in southern China and Bhutan. Azuki Beans.jpg
Azuki bean cultivation was common in southern Jōmon period Japan and also in southern China and Bhutan.

The degree to which horticulture or small-scale agriculture was practiced by Jōmon people is debated. The hunter-gatherer conceptualization of the Jōmon period culture is part of scientific romanticized narratives. [28] There is evidence to suggest that arboriculture was practiced in the form of tending groves of lacquer (Toxicodendron verniciflua) and nut (Castanea crenata and Aesculus turbinata) producing trees, [30] [31] as well as soybean, bottle gourd, hemp, Perilla, adzuki, among others. These characteristics place them somewhere in between hunting-gathering and agriculture. [28]

An apparently domesticated variety of peach appeared very early at Jōmon sites in 6700–6400  BP (4700–4400  BCE). [32] This was already similar to modern cultivated forms. This domesticated type of peach was apparently brought into Japan from China. Nevertheless, in China, itself, this variety is currently attested only at a later date of c. 5300–4300 BP. [32]

Middle Jōmon (3520–2470 BCE)

Jomon clay mask, bearing similarities to clay masks found in the Amur region. Clay mask, Jomon period 1000-400 BC.jpg
Jōmon clay mask, bearing similarities to clay masks found in the Amur region.

Highly ornate pottery dogū figurines and vessels, such as the so-called "flame style" vessels, and lacquered wood objects remain from that time. Although the ornamentation of pottery increased over time, the ceramic fabric always remained quite coarse. During this time Magatama stone beads make a transition from being a common jewelry item found in homes into serving as a grave good. [33] This is a period where there are large burial mounds and monuments. [14]

The Magatama is a famous jewelry from Jomon period Japan, and was also found in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia. Magatama.png
The Magatama is a famous jewelry from Jōmon period Japan, and was also found in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia.
Reconstruction of a Jomon period houses in the Aomori Prefecture. 140913 Sannai-Maruyama site Aomori Japan10n.jpg
Reconstruction of a Jōmon period houses in the Aomori Prefecture.

This period saw a rise in complexity in the design of pit-houses, the most commonly used method of housing at the time, [34] with some even having paved stone floors. [35] A study in 2015 found that this form of dwelling continued up until the Satsumon culture. [36] Using archaeological data on pollen count, this phase is the warmest of all the phases. [37] By the end of this phase the warm climate starts to enter a cooling trend. [14]

Late and Final Jōmon (2470–500 BCE)

After 1500 BCE, the climate cooled entering a stage of neoglaciation, and populations seem to have contracted dramatically. [14] Comparatively few archaeological sites can be found after 1500 BCE.

Jomon period clay figure from the Yamanashi Prefecture. Periodo jomon primo-medio, dogu, 7000-2000 a.c..JPG
Jōmon period clay figure from the Yamanashi Prefecture.

Castanea crenata becomes essential, not only as a nut bearing tree, but also because it was extremely durable in wet conditions and became the most used timber for building houses during the Late Jōmon phase. [38]

During the Final Jōmon period, a slow shift was taking place in western Japan: steadily increasing contact with the Korean Peninsula eventually led to the establishment of Korean-type settlements in western Kyushu, beginning around 900 BCE. The settlers brought with them new technologies such as wet rice farming and bronze and iron metallurgy, as well as new pottery styles similar to those of the Mumun pottery period. The settlements of these new arrivals seem to have coexisted with those of the Jōmon and Yayoi for around a thousand years.

Reconstruction of Yayoi period houses in Kyushu. Yoshinogari Yayoi Village a009.jpg
Reconstruction of Yayoi period houses in Kyushu.

Outside Hokkaido, the Final Jōmon is succeeded by a new farming culture, the Yayoi (c. 300 BCE – 300 CE), named after an archaeological site near Tokyo. [7]

Within Hokkaido, the Jōmon is succeeded by the Okhotsk culture and Zoku-Jōmon (post-Jōmon) or Epi-Jōmon culture, which later replaced or merged with the Satsumon culture around the 7th century.

Main periods

Middle Jomon vessel Periodo jomon medio, vasellame, 05.JPG
Middle Jomon vessel

Population decline

At the end of the Jōmon period the local population declined sharply. Scientists suggest that this was possibly caused by food shortages and other environmental problems. They concluded that not all Jōmon groups suffered under these circumstances but the overall population declined. [39] Examining the remains of the people who lived throughout the Jōmon period, there is evidence that these deaths were not inflicted by warfare or violence on a large enough scale to cause these deaths. [40]

Foundation myths

The origin myths of Japanese civilization extend back to periods now regarded as part of the Jōmon period, though they show little or no relation to the current archaeological understanding of Jōmon culture. 11 February 660 BCE is the traditional founding date of the Japanese nation by Emperor Jimmu. This version of Japanese history, however, comes from the country's first written records, the Kojiki and Nihon Shoki , dating from the 6th to the 8th centuries, after Japan had adopted Chinese characters (Go-on/Kan-on). [41]

Some elements of modern Japanese culture may date from this period and reflect the influences of a mingled migration from the northern Asian continent and the southern Pacific areas and the local Jōmon peoples. Among these elements are the precursors to Shinto, marriage customs, architectural styles, and technological developments such as lacquerware, laminated yumi, and metalworking.

Origin and ethnogenesis

Forensic reconstruction from a local Niigata Jomon sample. Jomon people Skull and Restoration model - Niigata Prefectural Museum of History.jpg
Forensic reconstruction from a local Niigata Jōmon sample.

The relationship of Jōmon people to the modern Japanese (Yamato people), Ryukyuans, and Ainu is diverse and not well clarified. Morphological studies of dental variation and genetic studies suggest that the Jōmon people were rather diverse, while other studies of autosomes and immunoglobin alleles suggest that the Jōmon people were of predominantly Northeast Asian and Siberian origin. [42] [43] The contemporary Japanese people descended from a mixture of the various ancient hunter-gatherer tribes of the Jōmon period and the Yayoi rice-agriculturalists, and these two major ancestral groups came to Japan over different routes at different times. [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50]

The Jōmon people were not one homogenous ethnic group. According to Mitsuru Sakitani the Jōmon people are an admixture of several Paleolithic populations. He suggests that Y-chromosome haplogroups C1a1 and D-M55 are two of the Jōmon lineages. [51]

According to study “Jōmon culture and the peopling of the Japanese archipelago” by Schmidt and Seguchi (2014), the prehistoric Jōmon people descended from diverse paleolithic populations with multiple migrations into Jōmon-period Japan. They concluded: "In this respect, the biological identity of the Jomon is heterogeneous, and it may be indicative of diverse peoples who possibly belonged to a common culture, known as the Jomon". [52]

A study by Lee and Hasegawa of the Waseda University, concluded that the Jōmon period population of Hokkaido consisted of two distinctive populations, which later merged to form the proto-Ainu in northern Hokkaido. They further concluded that the "dual structure theory" regarding the population history of Japan must be revised and that the Jōmon people had more diversity than originally suggested. [53]

A 2015 study found specific gene alleles, related to facial structure and features among some Ainu individuals, which largely descended from local Hokkaido Jōmon groups. These alleles are typically associated with Europeans but absent from other East Asians (including Japanese people), which suggests geneflow from a currently unidentified source population into the Jōmon period population of Hokkaido. Although these specific alleles can explain the unusual physical appearance of certain Ainu individuals, compared to other Northeast Asians, the exact origin of these alleles remains unknown. [54] [55]

Recent Y chromosome haplotype testing indicates that male haplogroups D-M55 (~30%) and C1a1 (5.4%) may reflect paternal Jōmon contribution to the modern Japanese Archipelago. [56] Analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of Jōmon skeletons indicates that haplogroups N9b, D4h2, G1b and M7a may reflect maternal Jōmon contribution to the modern Japanese mtDNA pool. [57] [58] [59] [60] [61]

Full genome analyses in 2020 and 2021 revealed further information regarding the origin of the Jōmon peoples. The genetic results suggest early admixture between different groups in Japan already during the Paleolithic, followed by constant geneflow from coastal East Asian groups, resulting in a heterogeneous population which then homogenized until the arrival of the Yayoi people. Geneflow from Northeast Asia during the Jōmon period is associated with the C1a1 and C2 lineages, geneflow from the Tibetan Plateau and Southern China is associated with the D1a2a (previously D1b) and D1a1 (previously D1a) lineages. Geneflow from ancient Siberia was also detected into the northern Jōmon people of Hokkaido, with later geneflow from Hokkaido into parts of northern Honshu (Tohoku). The lineages K and F are suggested to have been presented during the early Jōmon period but got replaced by C and D. The analysis of a Jōmon sample (Ikawazu) and an ancient sample from the Tibetan Plateau (Chokhopani, Ch) found only partially shared ancestry, pointing towards a "positive genetic bottleneck" regarding the spread of haplogroup D from ancient "East Asian Highlanders" (related to modern day Tujia people, Mien people, and Tibetans, as well as Tripuri people). The genetic evidence suggests that an East Asian source population, near the Himalayan mountain range, contributed ancestry to the Jōmon period population of Japan, and less to ancient Southeast Asians. The authors concluded that this points to an inland migration through southern or central China towards Japan during the Paleolithic. Another ancestry component seem to have arrived from Siberia into Hokkaido. [62] [63] [64] Archeological and biological evidence link the southern Jōmon culture of Kyushu, Shikoku and parts of Honshu to cultures of southern China and Northeast India. A common culture, known as the "broadleafed evergreen forest culture", ranged from southwestern Japan through southern China towards Northeast India and southern Tibet, and was characterized by the cultivation of Azuki beans. [65]

Another study, published in the Cambridge University Press in 2020, concluded that there was a large migration of ancient Northeast Asians at approximately 6000BC (or already at ~10,000BC), which introduced the Incipient Jōmon culture, typified by early ceramic cultures such as the ones found at Ōdai Yamamoto I Jōmon Site or Aoyagamiji site in the Tottori prefecture. This migration is linked to haplogroup C1a1 and C2. The authors argue that this migration may be the source of the Japonic languages rather than the later Yayoi migration. [66] [67]

See also


  1. Radiocarbon measures of carbonized material from pottery artifacts (uncalibrated): Fukui Cave 12 500 ± 350 BP and 12 500 ± 500 BP Kamaki & Serizawa (1967), Kamikuroiwa rockshelter 12 165 ± 350 BP in Shikoku.

Related Research Articles

Ainu people Ethnic group in Japan and Russia

The Ainu are the indigenous people of the lands surrounding the Sea of Okhotsk, including Hokkaido Island, Northeast Honshu Island, Sakhalin Island, the Kuril Islands, the Kamchatka Peninsula and Khabarovsk Krai, before the arrival of the Yamato Japanese and Russians. These regions are referred to as Ezo (蝦夷) in historical Japanese texts.

Ryukyuan people Japonic ethnic group native to the Ryukyu islands

The Ryukyuan people, also Lewchewan or Loochooan, are an East Asian ethnic group native to the Ryukyu Islands, which stretch between the islands of Kyushu and Taiwan. Administratively, they live in either the Okinawa Prefecture or the Kagoshima Prefecture within Japan. They speak one of the Ryukyuan languages, considered to be one of the two branches of the Japonic language family, the other being Japanese and its dialects. Hachijō is sometimes considered to constitute a third branch.

Yayoi period Japanese historical period from 200 BCE to 300 CE

The Yayoi period started at the beginning of the Neolithic in Japan, continued through the Bronze Age, and towards its end crossed into the Iron Age.

Japanese people Ethnic group native to Japan

Japanese people are an ethnic group that is native to the Japanese archipelago and modern country of Japan, where they constitute 98.1% of the country’s population. Worldwide, approximately 129 million people are of Japanese descent; of these, approximately 125 million are residents of Japan. People of Japanese ancestry who live outside Japan are referred to as nikkeijin (日系人), the Japanese diaspora. The term ethnic Japanese is used to refer to mainland Japanese people, specifically the Yamato. Japanese people are one of the largest ethnic groups in the world.

Yamato people Ethnic group native to Japan

The Yamato people or the Wajin are an East Asian ethnic group and a nation which is indigenous to the Japanese archipelago. The term came to be used around the late 19th century to distinguish the settlers of mainland Japan from minority ethnic groups inhabiting the peripheral areas of the Japanese empire, such as the Ainu, Emishi, Ryukyuans, Nivkh, Oroks, as well as Koreans, Han-Chinese, Taiwanese aborigines, and Micronesian peoples who were incorporated into the Empire of Japan in the early 20th century. Clan leaders also elevated their own belief system that featured ancestor worship into a national religion known as Shinto.

Japanese Paleolithic Period of human inhabitation in Japan predating the development of pottery

The Japanese Paleolithic period is the period of human inhabitation in Japan predating the development of pottery, generally before 10,000 BC. The starting dates commonly given to this period are from around 40,000 BC; although any date of human presence before 35,000 BC is controversial, with artifacts supporting a pre-35,000 BC human presence on the archipelago being of questionable authenticity. The period extended to the beginning of the Mesolithic Jōmon period, or around 14,000 BC.

Hāfu is a Japanese language term used to refer to an individual born to one ethnic Japanese and one non-Japanese parent. A loanword from English, the term literally means "half," a reference to the individual's non-Japanese heritage. The word can also be used to describe anyone with mixed-racial ancestry in general. Japan remains one of the most homogeneous societies on the planet, which puts children of non-Japanese parents in a unique and difficult position, as they are called hāfu Japanese. hāfu individuals are well represented in the media in Japan and abroad and recent studies estimate that 1 in 30 children born in Japan are born to interracial couples.

Yayoi people Ancient ethnic group and ancestors of the Japanese people

The Yayoi people were an ancient ethnic group that migrated to the Japanese archipelago from China and Korea during the Yayoi period. Radio-carbon evidence suggests the Yayoi period began between 1,000 and 800 BCE. They interacted, intermarried, and warred with the remaining Jōmon people to form the modern Japanese people. Modern Japanese people have primarily Yayoi ancestry.

"Jōmon people" is the generic name of several peoples who lived in the Japanese archipelago during the Jōmon period. Today, most Japanese historians agree on the possibility that the Jōmon were not a single homogeneous people, but instead consisted of multiple heterogeneous groups.

Xu Fu Chinese alchemist and explorer

Xu Fu (Hsu Fu; Chinese: 徐福 or 徐巿; pinyin: Xú Fú; Wade–Giles: Hsu2 Fu2; Japanese: 徐福 Jofuku or 徐巿 Jofutsu; Korean: 서복 Seo Bok or 서불 Seo Bul) was a Chinese alchemist and explorer. He was born in 255 BC in Qi, an ancient Chinese state, and died between 195 and 155 BC. He served as a court sorcerer in Qin Dynasty China. Later, he was sent by Qin Shi Huang to the eastern seas twice to look for the elixir of life. His two journeys occurred between 219 BC and 210 BC. It was believed that the fleet included 60 barques with soldiers, ship crewmen, and 3,000 boys and 3,000 girls, and craftsmen of different fields. After he embarked on a second mission in 210 BC, he never returned.

Japanese prehistoric art is a wide-ranging category, spanning the Jōmon and Yayoi periods, and the entire Japanese archipelago, including Hokkaidō in the north, and the Ryukyu Islands in the south which were politically not part of Japan until the late 19th century.

Jōmon pottery

The Jōmon pottery is a type of ancient earthenware pottery which was made during the Jōmon period in Japan. The term "Jōmon" (縄文) means "rope-patterned" in Japanese, describing the patterns that are pressed into the clay.

The Satsumon culture is a post-Jōmon, partially agricultural, archeological culture of northern Honshu and southern Hokkaido that has been identified as the Emishi, as a Japanese-Emishi mixed culture, as the incipient modern Ainu, or with all three synonymously. It may have arisen as a merger of the Yayoi–Kofun and the Jōmon cultures. The Satsumon culture appears to have spread from eastern Honshu into southern Hokkaido. The Ainu culture is now generally considered to have originated from the Okhotsk culture which merged with the Satsumon.

Okhotsk culture 5th–10th-century archaeological culture around the Sea of Okhotsk

The Okhotsk culture is an archaeological coastal fishing and hunter-gatherer culture of the lands surrounding the Sea of Okhotsk and Japan. The historical Okhotsk people were related to various Northeast Asians and were one of the diverse people living during the Jōmon period in (northern) Japan. The Okhotsk are one of the ancestral components of the Ainu people and contributed the Ainu languages and significant cultural elements. It is suggested that the bear cult, a practice shared by the Ainu and the Nivkhs, was an important element of the Okhotsk culture and may have been common in Jomon period Japan as well.

Ōdai Yamamoto I Site

The Ōdai Yamamoto I Site is an Jōmon archaeological site in the town of Sotogahama, Aomori Prefecture, in the Tōhoku region of northern Japan. Excavations in 1998 uncovered forty-six earthenware fragments which have been dated as early as 14,500 BC ; this places them among the earliest pottery currently known. As the earliest in Japan, this marks the transition from the Japanese Paleolithic to Incipient Jōmon. Other pottery of a similar date has been found at Gasya and Khummi on the lower Amur River. Such a date puts the development of pottery before the warming at the end of the Pleistocene.

The Emishi, written with Chinese characters that literally mean "shrimp barbarians," constituted an ancient ethnic group of people who lived in parts of Honshū, especially in the Tōhoku region, referred to as michi no oku in contemporary sources.

Sanganji shell mound

Sanganji shell mound is a Late-to-Final Jōmon shell mound in Shinchi, Fukushima, Tōhoku region, Japan. The shell mound was excavated in 1952 by the Special Committee for Jomon Chronology of the Japanese Archaeological Association and in 1954 by the University of Tokyo Department of Anthropology. The remains of over 40 individuals were excavated from the site. The remains are now housed in The University Museum at the University of Tokyo.

Haplogroup D-M55 (M64.1/Page44.1) also known as Haplogroup D1a2a is a Y-chromosome haplogroup. It is one of two branches of Haplogroup D1a. The other is D1a1, which is found with high frequency in Tibetans and other Tibeto-Burmese populations and geographical close groups. D is also distributed with low to medium frequency in Central Asia, East Asia, and Mainland Southeast Asia.

In population genetics, research has been done on the genetic origins of modern Japanese people.

The Zoku-Jōmon period (続縄文時代), also referred to as the Epi-Jōmon period, is the time in Japanese prehistory that saw the flourishing of the Zoku-Jōmon culture, a continuation of Jōmon culture in northern Tōhoku and Hokkaidō that corresponds with the Yayoi period and Kofun period elsewhere. Zoku-Jōmon in turn gave way to Satsumon around the seventh century or in the Nara period (710–794). The "Yayoinisation" of northeast Honshū took place in the mid-Yayoi period; use of the term Zoku-Jōmon is then confined to those, in Hokkaidō, who did not "become Yayoi". Despite the elements of continuity emphasised by the name, which include the continuing production of cord-marked ceramics, ongoing employment of stone technology, and non-transition to rice-based agriculture, all Yayoi hallmarks, the Zoku-Jōmon period nevertheless saw a "major break in mobility and subsistence patterns".


  1. 1 2 Perri, Angela R. (2016). "Hunting dogs as environmental adaptations in Jōmon Japan" (PDF). Antiquity. 90 (353): 1166–1180. doi:10.15184/aqy.2016.115. S2CID   163956846.
  2. 1 2 3 Timothy Jinam; Hideaki Kanzawa-Kiriyama; Naruya Saitou (2015). "Human genetic diversity in the Japanese Archipelago: dual structure and beyond". Genes & Genetic Systems. 90 (3): 147–152. doi: 10.1266/ggs.90.147 . PMID   26510569.
  3. 1 2 Robbeets, Martine (2015), Diachrony of Verb Morphology: Japanese and the Transeurasian Languages, De Gruyter, p. 26, ISBN   978-3-11-039994-3
  4. 1 2 Mason, 14
  5. Kuzmin, Y.V. (2006). "Chronology of the Earliest Pottery in East Asia: Progress and Pitfalls". Antiquity. 80 (308): 362–371. doi:10.1017/s0003598x00093686. S2CID   17316841.
  6. Birmingham Museum of Art (2010). Birmingham Museum of Art : Guide to the Collection. Birmingham, AL: Birmingham Museum of Art. p. 40. ISBN   978-1-904832-77-5.
  7. 1 2 3 Imamura, K. (1996) Prehistoric Japan: New Perspectives on Insular East Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press
  8. Mizoguchi, Koji (2002). An Archaeological History of Japan, 30,000 B.C. to A.D. 700. University of Pennsylvania Press, Incorporated. ISBN   978-0-8122-3651-4.
  9. 長野県立歴史館 (1996-07-01). "縄文人の一生". Comprehensive Database of Archaeological Site Reports in Japan. Retrieved 2016-09-02.
  10. Koyama, Shuzo, and David Hurst Thomas (eds.). (1979). Affluent Foragers: Pacific Coasts East and West. Senri Ethnological Studies No. 9. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
  11. Aikens, C. Melvin (1992). Pacific northeast Asia in prehistory: hunter-fisher-gatherers, farmers, and sociopolitical elites. WSU Press. ISBN   978-0-87422-092-6.
  12. Fiedel, Stuart J. (1992). Prehistory of the Americas. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   9780521425445.
  13. "Archaeology | Studies examine clues of transoceanic contact". The Columbus Dispatch. Retrieved 2017-10-04.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Sakaguchi, Takashi. (2009). Storage adaptations among hunter–gatherers: A quantitative approach to the Jomon period. Journal of anthropological archaeology, 28(3), 290–303. SAN DIEGO: Elsevier Inc.
  15. Silberman et al., 154–155.
  16. Schirokauer et al., 133–143.
  17. Shōda, Shinya (2007). "A comment on the Yayoi Period dating controversy". Bulletin of the Society for East Asian Archaeology. 1.
  18. 1 2 3 Mason, 13
  19. Hudson, Mark J. (1999). Ruins of Identity: Ethnogenesis in the Japanese islands. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN   978-0-8248-2156-2.
  20. 1 2 Habu, Junko (2004). Ancient Jomōn of Japan. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-77670-7.
  21. 1 2 Wu, X.; Zhang, C.; Goldberg, P.; Cohen, D.; Pan, Y.; Arpin, T.; Bar-Yosef, O. (June 29, 2012). "Early pottery at 20 000 years ago in Xianrendong Cave, China". Science . 336 (6089): 1696–1700. Bibcode:2012Sci...336.1696W. doi:10.1126/science.1218643. PMID   22745428. S2CID   37666548.
  22. Stanglin, Douglas (29 June 2012). "Pottery found in China cave confirmed as world's oldest". USA Today .
  23. "Chinese pottery may be earliest discovered". Cleveland.com. Associated Press. 1 June 2009.
  24. Kuzmin, Y.V.; Keally, C.T. (2001). "Radiocarbon chronology of the earliest Neolithic sites in east Asia". Radiocarbon. 43 (2B): 1121–1128. doi: 10.1017/s0033822200041771 .
  25. Craig, O.E.; Saul, H. (2013). "Earliest evidence for the use of pottery". Nature . 496 (7445): 351–354. Bibcode:2013Natur.496..351C. doi:10.1038/nature12109. PMID   23575637. S2CID   3094491.
  26. Craig & Saul 2013.
  27. Mason, 15, 17
  28. 1 2 3 Crawford, Gary W. (2011). "Advances in understanding early agriculture in Japan". Current Anthropology. 52 (S4): S331–S345. doi:10.1086/658369. JSTOR   10.1086/658369. S2CID   143756517.
  29. Francis E. Mayle; David Beerling; William D. Gosling; Mark B. Bush (2004). "Responses of Amazonian ecosystems to climatic and atmospheric carbon dioxide changes since the Last Glacial Maximum". Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. 359 (1443): 499–514. doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1434. PMC   1693334 . PMID   15212099.
  30. Matsui, A.; Kanehara, M. (2006). "The question of prehistoric plant husbandry during the Jomōn Period in Japan". World Archaeology. 38 (2): 259–273. doi:10.1080/00438240600708295. S2CID   162258797.
  31. Crawford, G.W. (1992). "The transitions to agriculture in Japan". In Gebauer, A.B.; Price, T.D. (eds.). Transitions to Agriculture in Prehistory. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 117–132.
  32. 1 2 Yang, Xiaoyan; Zheng, Yunfei; Crawford, Gary W.; Chen, Xugao (2014). "Archaeological evidence for peach (Prunus persica) cultivation and domestication in China". PLOS ONE. 9 (9): e106595. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j6595Z. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106595 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   4156326 . PMID   25192436.
  33. Nishimura, Y. (2018). The Evolution of Curved Beads (Magatama 勾玉/曲玉) in Jōmon Period Japan and the Development of Individual Ownership. Asian Perspectives57(1), 105-158. doi:10.1353/asi.2018.0004.
  34. "Early Jomon hamlet found". The Japan Times. May 27, 1997.
  35. Moriya, Toyohito (2015). "A Study of the Utilization of Wood to Build Pit Dwellings from the Epi-Jomon Culture" (PDF). Journal of the Graduate School of Letters. 10: 71–85. doi:10.14943/jgsl.10.71.
  36. Moriya 2015.
  37. Kusaka, Soichiro, Hyodo, Fujio, Yumoto, Takakazu, & Nakatsukasa, Masato. (2010). Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analysis on the diet of Jomon populations from two coastal regions of Japan. Journal of archaeological science, 37(8), 1968–1977. LONDON: Elsevier BV.
  38. Noshiro, Shuichi, & Sasaki, Yuka. (2014). Pre-agricultural management of plant resources during the Jomon period in Japan—a sophisticated subsistence system on plant resources. Journal of archaeological science, 42(1), 93–106. LONDON: Elsevier BV.
  39. Ohashi, Jun; Tokunaga, Katsushi; Hitomi, Yuki; Sawai, Hiromi; Khor, Seik-Soon; Naka, Izumi; Watanabe, Yusuke (2019-06-17). "Analysis of whole Y-chromosome sequences reveals the Japanese population history in the Jomon period". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 8556. Bibcode:2019NatSR...9.8556W. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44473-z. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   6572846 . PMID   31209235.
  40. Nakao, Hisashi, Tamura, Kohei, Arimatsu, Yui, Nakagawa, Tomomi, Matsumoto, Naoko, & Matsugi, Takehiko. (2016). Violence in the prehistoric period of Japan: the spatio-temporal pattern of skeletal evidence for violence in the Jomon period. Biology letters (2005), 12(3), 20160028. Historical Article, LONDON: The Royal Society.
  41. OKimori Takuya "日本の漢字1600年の歴史 (1600 years of history in Japanese Kanji)" "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-10-17. Retrieved 2012-10-23.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  42. "Out of Sunda by Jōmon Japanese". Southeast Asia. Scribd. Earth & Life Sciences. Retrieved 2017-07-05.
  43. Kanzawa-Kiriyama, Hideaki; Saso, Aiko; Suwa, Gen; Saitou, Naruya (2013). "Ancient mitochondrial DNA sequences of Jōmon teeth samples from Sanganji, Tohoku district, Japan". Anthropological Science. 121 (2): 89–103. doi: 10.1537/ase.121113 . Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  44. Hanihara, K. (1984). "Origins and affinities of Japanese viewed from cranial measurements". Acta Anthropogenetica. 8 (1–2): 149–158. PMID   6537211.
  45. Hammer, Michael F.; Karafet, Tatiana M.; Park, Hwayong; Omoto, Keiichi; Harihara, Shinji; Stoneking, Mark; Horai, Satoshi (2006). "Dual origins of the Japanese: Common ground for hunter-gatherer and farmer Y chromosomes". Journal of Human Genetics . 51 (1): 47–58. doi: 10.1007/s10038-005-0322-0 . PMID   16328082.
  46. Rita Rasteiro; Lounès Chikhi (2009). "Revisiting the peopling of Japan: An admixture perspective". Journal of Human Genetics . 54 (6): 349–354. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2009.39 . PMID   19424284.
  47. He, Yungang; Wang, Wei R.; Xu, Shuhua; Jin, Li (2012). "Paleolithic contingent in modern Japanese: Estimation and inference using genome-wide data". Scientific Reports . 2 (355): 47–58. Bibcode:2012NatSR...2E.355H. doi:10.1038/srep00355. PMC   3320058 . PMID   22482036.
  48. Sato, Youichi; et al. (2014). "Overview of genetic variation in the Y chromosome of modern Japanese males". Anthropological Science. 122 (3): 131–136. doi: 10.1537/ase.140709 .
  49. Kanzawa-Kiriyama, Hideaki; Kryukov, Kirill; Jinam, Timothy A.; Hosomichi, Kazuyoshi; Saso, Aiko; Suwa, Gen; et al. (February 2017). "A partial nuclear genome of the Jōmons who lived 3 000 years ago in Fukushima, Japan". Journal of Human Genetics . 62 (2): 213–221. doi:10.1038/jhg.2016.110. PMC   5285490 . PMID   27581845.
  50. Nara, Takashi; Adachi, Noboru; Yoneda, Minoru; Hagihara, Yasuo; Saeki, Fumiko; Koibuchi, Ryoko; Takahashi, Ryohei (2019). "Mitochondrial DNA analysis of the human skeletons excavated from the Shomyoji shell midden site, Kanagawa, Japan". Anthropological Science. 127 (1): 65–72. doi: 10.1537/ase.190307 . ISSN   0918-7960.
  51. 崎谷満『DNA・考古・言語の学際研究が示す新・日本列島史』(勉誠出版 2009年)(in Japanese)
  52. Schmidt, Seguchi (2014). "Jōmon culture and the peopling of the Japanese archipelago" (PDF). These results suggest a level of inter-regional heterogeneity not expected among Jomon groups. This observation is further substantiated by the studies of Kanzawa-Kiriyama et al. (2013) and Adachi et al. (2013). Kanzawa-Kiriyama et al. (2013) analysed craniometrics and extracted aDNA from museum samples that came from the Sanganji shell mound site in Fukushima Prefecture dated to the Final Jomon Period. They tested for regional differences and found the Tokoku Jomon (northern Honshu) were more similar to Hokkaido Jomon than to geographically adjacent Kanto Jomon (central Honshu).
    Adachi et al. (2013) described the craniometrics and aDNA sequence from a Jomon individual from Nagano (Yugora cave site) dated to the middle of the initial Jomon Period (7920–7795 cal BP). This individual carried ancestry, which is widely distributed among modern East Asians (Nohira et al. 2010; Umetsu et al. 2005) and resembled modern Northeast Asian comparison samples rather than geographical close Urawa Jomon sample.
  53. Lee, Hasegawa, Sean, Toshikazu (April 2013). "Evolution of the Ainu Language in Space and Time". PLOS ONE. 8 (4): e62243. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...862243L. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062243 . PMC   3637396 . PMID   23638014. In this paper, we reconstructed spatiotemporal evolution of 19 Ainu language varieties, and the results are in strong agreement with the hypothesis that a recent population expansion of the Okhotsk people played a critical role in shaping the Ainu people and their culture. Together with the recent archaeological, biological and cultural evidence, our phylogeographic reconstruction of the Ainu language strongly suggests that the conventional dual-structure model must be refined to explain these new bodies of evidence. The case of the Ainu language origin we report here also contributes additional detail to the global pattern of language evolution, and our language phylogeny might also provide a basis for making further inferences about the cultural dynamics of the Ainu speakers [44,45].
  54. Jinam, Timothy A.; Kanzawa-Kiriyama, Hideaki; Inoue, Ituro; Tokunaga, Katsushi; Omoto, Keiichi; Saitou, Naruya (October 2015). "Unique characteristics of the Ainu population in Northern Japan". Journal of Human Genetics. 60 (10): 565–571. doi:10.1038/jhg.2015.79. ISSN   1435-232X. PMID   26178428. S2CID   205166287.
  55. Liu, F., van der Lijn, F., Schurmann, C., Zhu, G., Chakravarty, M. M., Hysi, P. G. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies five loci influencing facial morphology in Europeans. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002932 (2012).
  56. Hammer, Michael F.; Karafet, Tatiana M.; Park, Hwayong; Omoto, Keiichi; Harihara, Shinji; Stoneking, Mark; Horai, Satoshi (2006). "Dual origins of the Japanese: Common ground for hunter-gatherer and farmer Y chromosomes". Journal of Human Genetics . 51 (1): 47–58. doi: 10.1007/s10038-005-0322-0 . PMID   16328082.
  57. Kanzawa-Kiriyama, Hideaki; Saso, Aiko; Suwa, Gen; Saitou, Naruya (2013). "Ancient mitochondrial DNA sequences of Jōmon teeth samples from Sanganji, Tohoku district, Japan". Anthropological Science. 121 (2): 89–103. doi: 10.1537/ase.121113 . Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  58. Masashi Tanaka; et al. (2004). "Mitochondrial Genome Variation in Eastern Asia and the Peopling of Japan". Genome Research. 14 (10a): 1832–1850. doi:10.1101/gr.2286304. PMC   524407 . PMID   15466285.
  59. Adachi, N.; Shinoda, K.; Umetsu, K.; Matsumura, H. (2009). "Mitochondrial DNA analysis of Jomon skeletons from the Funadomari site, Hokkaido, and its implication for the origins of Native American". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 138 (3): 255–265. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20923. PMID   18951391.
  60. Ken-ichi Shinoda; Tsuneo Kakuda; Naomi Doi (2012). "Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms in late Shell midden period skeletal remains excavated from two archaeological sites in Okinawa" (PDF). Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science, Series D. 38: 51–61. Retrieved 5 February 2017.
  61. Ken-ichi Shinoda; Tsuneo Kakuda; Naomi Doi (2013). "Ancient DNA Analyses of Human Skeletal Remains from the Gusuku Period in the Ryukyu Islands, Japan" (PDF). Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science, Series D. 39: 1–8. Retrieved 5 February 2017.
  62. Yang, Melinda A.; Fan, Xuechun; Sun, Bo; Chen, Chungyu; Lang, Jianfeng; Ko, Ying-Chin; Tsang, Cheng-hwa; Chiu, Hunglin; Wang, Tianyi; Bao, Qingchuan; Wu, Xiaohong (2020-07-17). "Ancient DNA indicates human population shifts and admixture in northern and southern China". Science. 369 (6501): 282–288. Bibcode:2020Sci...369..282Y. doi:10.1126/science.aba0909. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   32409524. S2CID   218649510.
  63. Boer, Elisabeth de; Yang, Melinda A.; Kawagoe, Aileen; Barnes, Gina L. (2020). "Japan considered from the hypothesis of farmer/language spread". Evolutionary Human Sciences. 2. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.7 . ISSN   2513-843X.
  64. Watanabe, Yusuke; Ohashi, Jun (2021-03-08). "Comprehensive analysis of Japanese archipelago population history by detecting ancestry-marker polymorphisms without using ancient DNA data". bioRxiv   10.1101/2020.12.07.414037 .
  65. Isemura, Takehisa (2011). "Distribution of the " Broadleaved Evergreen Forest Culture (Laurel Forest Culture) "".
  66. Chaubey, Gyaneshwer; Driem, George van (2020). "Munda languages are father tongues, but Japanese and Korean are not". Evolutionary Human Sciences. 2. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.14 . ISSN   2513-843X.
  67. Shinoda; et al. (2020-03-27). [調査研究活動報告] 鳥取県鳥取市青谷上寺地遺跡出土弥生後期人骨のDNA分析.[ dead link ]