Joseph Schumpeter

Last updated
Joseph Schumpeter
Joseph Schumpeter ekonomialaria.jpg
Born(1883-02-08)8 February 1883
Died8 January 1950(1950-01-08) (aged 66)
NationalityAustrian and American
Institution Harvard University, 1932–50
University of Bonn, 1925–32
Biedermann Bank, 1921–24
University of Graz, 1912–14
University of Czernowitz, 1909–11
Field Economics, econometrics
School or
tradition
Historical school of economics
Lausanne School
Alma mater University of Vienna
Doctoral
advisor
Eugen Böhm von Bawerk
Doctoral
students
Ferdinand A. Hermens
Paul Samuelson
James Tobin [1]
Anne Carter [2]
Other notable students Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen
Paul Sweezy
Hyman Minsky
Influences Walras · Schmoller · Pareto · Menger · Weber · Sombart
Contributions Business cycles
Creative destruction
Economic development
Entrepreneurship
Evolutionary economics

Joseph Alois Schumpeter (German: [ˈʃʊmpeːtɐ] ; 8 February 1883 – 8 January 1950) [3] was an Austrian political economist. He later emigrated to the US and, in 1939, he obtained American citizenship. He was born in Moravia, and briefly served as Finance Minister of German-Austria in 1919. In 1932, he became a professor at Harvard University where he remained until the end of his career.

Contents

Schumpeter was one of the most influential economists of the early 20th century, and popularized the term "creative destruction" in economics. [4] [5] [6]

Early life and education

Schumpeter was born in Triesch, Habsburg Moravia (now Třešť in the Czech Republic, then part of Austria-Hungary) in 1883 to Catholic German-speaking parents. Both of his grandmothers were Czech. [7] Schumpeter did not acknowledge his Czech ancestry; he considered himself an ethnic German. [7] His father owned a factory, but he died when Joseph was only four years old. [8] In 1893, Joseph and his mother moved to Vienna. [9] Schumpeter was a loyal supporter of Franz Joseph I of Austria. [7]

After attending school at the Theresianum, Schumpeter began his career studying law at the University of Vienna under the Austrian capital theorist Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, taking his PhD in 1906. In 1909, after some study trips, he became a professor of economics and government at the University of Czernowitz in modern-day Ukraine. In 1911, he joined the University of Graz, where he remained until World War I.

In 1918, Schumpeter was a member of the Socialization Commission established by the Council of the People's Deputies in Germany. In March 1919, he was invited to take office as Minister of Finance in the Republic of German-Austria. He proposed a capital levy as a way to tackle the war debt and opposed the socialization of the Alpine Mountain plant. [10] In 1921, he became president of the private Biedermann Bank. He was also a board member at the Kaufmann Bank. Problems at those banks left Schumpeter in debt. His resignation was a condition of the takeover of the Biedermann Bank in September 1924. [11]

From 1925 to 1932, Schumpeter held a chair at the University of Bonn, Germany. He lectured at Harvard in 1927–1928 and 1930. In 1931, he was a visiting professor at The Tokyo College of Commerce. In 1932, Schumpeter moved to the United States, and soon began what would become extensive efforts to help central European economist colleagues displaced by Nazism. [12] Schumpeter also became known for his opposition to Marxism and socialism that he thought would lead to dictatorship, and even criticized President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal. [13] In 1939, Schumpeter became a US citizen. In the beginning of World War II, the FBI investigated him and his wife, Elizabeth Boody (a prominent scholar of Japanese economics) for pro-Nazi leanings, but found no evidence of Nazi sympathies. [14] [15]

At Harvard, Schumpeter was considered a memorable character, erudite and even showy in the classroom. He became known for his heavy teaching load and his personal and painstaking interest in his students. He served as the faculty advisor of the Graduate Economics Club and organized private seminars and discussion groups. [16] Some colleagues thought his views outdated by Keynesianism which was fashionable; others resented his criticisms, particularly of their failure to offer an assistant professorship to Paul Samuelson, but recanted when they thought him likely to accept a position at Yale University. [17] This period of his life was characterized by hard work and comparatively little recognition of his massive 2-volume book Business Cycles. However, the Schumpeters persevered, and in 1942 published what became the most popular of all his works, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , reprinted many times and in many languages in the following decades, as well as cited thousands of times. [18]

Career

Influences

The source of Schumpeter's dynamic, change-oriented, and innovation-based economics was the Historical School of economics. Although his writings could be critical of the School, Schumpeter's work on the role of innovation and entrepreneurship can be seen as a continuation of ideas originated by the Historical School, especially the work of Gustav von Schmoller and Werner Sombart. [19] [20]

In a 2012 paper, Fabrice Dannequin showed that Schumpeter's writings displayed the influence of Francis Galton's work. [21]

Evolutionary economics

According to Christopher Freeman (2009), a scholar who devoted much time researching Schumpeter's work: "the central point of his whole life work [is]: that capitalism can only be understood as an evolutionary process of continuous innovation and 'creative destruction'". [22]

History of Economic Analysis

Schumpeter's scholarship is apparent in his posthumous History of Economic Analysis, [23] although some of his judgments seem idiosyncratic and sometimes cavalier[ according to whom? ]. For instance, Schumpeter thought that the greatest 18th century economist was Turgot, not Adam Smith, as many consider, and he considered Léon Walras to be the "greatest of all economists", beside whom other economists' theories were "like inadequate attempts to catch some particular aspects of Walrasian truth". [24] Schumpeter criticized John Maynard Keynes and David Ricardo for the "Ricardian vice." According to Schumpeter, Ricardo and Keynes reasoned in terms of abstract models, where they would freeze all but a few variables. Then they could argue that one caused the other in a simple monotonic fashion. This led to the belief that one could easily deduce policy conclusions directly from a highly abstract theoretical model.

In this book, Joseph Schumpeter recognized the implication of a gold monetary standard compared to a fiat monetary standard. In History of Economic Analysis, Schumpeter stated the following: "An 'automatic' gold currency is part and parcel of a laissez-faire and free-trade economy. It links every nation's money rates and price levels with the money-rates and price levels of all the other nations that are 'on gold.' However, gold is extremely sensitive to government expenditure and even to attitudes or policies that do not involve expenditure directly, for example, to foreign policy, to certain policies of taxation, and, in general, to precisely all those policies that violate the principles of [classical] liberalism. This is the reason why gold is so unpopular now and also why it was so popular in a bourgeois era." [25]

Business cycles

Schumpeter's relationships with the ideas of other economists were quite complex in his most important contributions to economic analysis – the theory of business cycles and development. Following neither Walras nor Keynes, Schumpeter starts in The Theory of Economic Development [26] with a treatise of circular flow which, excluding any innovations and innovative activities, leads to a stationary state. The stationary state is, according to Schumpeter, described by Walrasian equilibrium. The hero of his story is the entrepreneur.

The entrepreneur disturbs this equilibrium and is the prime cause of economic development, which proceeds in cyclic fashion along several time scales. In fashioning this theory connecting innovations, cycles, and development, Schumpeter kept alive the Russian Nikolai Kondratiev's ideas on 50-year cycles, Kondratiev waves.

Schumpeter suggested a model in which the four main cycles, Kondratiev (54 years), Kuznets (18 years), Juglar (9 years) and Kitchin (about 4 years) can be added together to form a composite waveform. Actually there was considerable professional rivalry between Schumpeter and Kuznets. The wave form suggested here did not include the Kuznets Cycle simply because Schumpeter did not recognize it as a valid cycle.[ clarification needed ] See "business cycle" for further information. A Kondratiev wave could consist of three lower degree Kuznets waves. [27] Each Kuznets wave could, itself, be made up of two Juglar waves. Similarly two (or three) Kitchin waves could form a higher degree Juglar wave. If each of these were in phase, more importantly if the downward arc of each was simultaneous so that the nadir of each was coincident, it would explain disastrous slumps and consequent depressions. As far as the segmentation of the Kondratiev Wave, Schumpeter never proposed such a fixed model. He saw these cycles varying in time – although in a tight time frame by coincidence – and for each to serve a specific purpose.

Economic cycle.svg
Proposed economic waves
Cycle/wave namePeriod (years)
Kitchin cycle (inventory, e.g. pork cycle)3–5
Juglar cycle (fixed investment)7–11
Kuznets swing (infrastructural investment)15–25
Kondratiev wave (technological basis)45–60

Keynesianism

In Schumpeter's theory, Walrasian equilibrium is not adequate to capture the key mechanisms of economic development. Schumpeter also thought that the institution enabling the entrepreneur to buy the resources needed to realize his vision was a well-developed capitalist financial system, including a whole range of institutions for granting credit. One could divide economists among (1) those who emphasized "real" analysis and regarded money as merely a "veil" and (2) those who thought monetary institutions are important and money could be a separate driving force. Both Schumpeter and Keynes were among the latter.[ citation needed ]

Demise of capitalism

Schumpeter's most popular book in English is probably Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy . While he agrees with Karl Marx that capitalism will collapse and be replaced by socialism, Schumpeter predicts a different way this will come about. While Marx predicted that capitalism would be overthrown by a violent proletarian revolution, which actually occurred in the least capitalist countries, Schumpeter believed that capitalism would gradually weaken by itself and eventually collapse. Specifically, the success of capitalism would lead to corporatism and to values hostile to capitalism, especially among intellectuals.

"Intellectuals" are a social class in a position to critique societal matters for which they are not directly responsible and to stand up for the interests of other classes. Intellectuals tend to have a negative outlook of capitalism, even while relying on it for prestige, because their professions rely on antagonism toward it. The growing number of people with higher education is a great advantage of capitalism, according to Schumpeter. Yet, unemployment and a lack of fulfilling work will lead to intellectual critique, discontent and protests.

Parliaments will increasingly elect social democratic parties, and democratic majorities will vote for restrictions on entrepreneurship. Increasing workers' self-management, industrial democracy and regulatory institutions would evolve non-politically into "liberal capitalism". Thus, the intellectual and social climate needed for thriving entrepreneurship will be replaced by some form of "laborism". This will exacerbate "creative destruction" (a borrowed phrase to denote an endogenous replacement of old ways of doing things by new ways), which will ultimately undermine and destroy the capitalist structure.

Schumpeter emphasizes throughout this book that he is analyzing trends, not engaging in political advocacy. [28]

William Fellner, in the book Schumpeter’s Vision: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy After 40 Years, noted that Schumpeter saw any political system in which the power was fully monopolized as fascist. [29]

Democratic theory

In the same book, Schumpeter expounded a theory of democracy which sought to challenge what he called the "classical doctrine". He disputed the idea that democracy was a process by which the electorate identified the common good, and politicians carried this out for them. He argued this was unrealistic, and that people's ignorance and superficiality meant that in fact they were largely manipulated by politicians, who set the agenda. Furthermore, he claimed that even if the common good was possible to find, it would still not make clear the means needed to reach its end, since citizens do not have the requisite knowledge to design government policy. [30] This made a 'rule by the people' concept both unlikely and undesirable. Instead he advocated a minimalist model, much influenced by Max Weber, whereby democracy is the mechanism for competition between leaders, much like a market structure. Although periodic votes by the general public legitimize governments and keep them accountable, the policy program is very much seen as their own and not that of the people, and the participatory role for individuals is usually severely limited.

Schumpeter defined democracy as the method by which people elected representatives in competitive elections to carry out their will. [31] This definition has been described as simple, elegant and parsimonious, making it clearer to distinguish political systems that either fulfill or fail these characteristics. [32] This minimalist definition stands in contrast to broader definitions of democracy, which may emphasize aspects such as "representation, accountability, equality, participation, justice, dignity, rationality, security, freedom." [31] Within such a minimalist definition, states which other scholars say have experienced democratic backsliding and which lack civil liberties, a free press, the rule of law and a constrained executive, would still be considered democracies. [32] [33] [34] For Schumpeter, the formation of a government is the endpoint of the democratic process, which means that for the purposes of his democratic theory, he has no comment on what kinds of decisions that the government can take in order to be a democracy. [35] Schumpeter faced pushback on his theory from other democratic theorists, such as Robert Dahl, who argued that there is more to democracy than simply the formation of government through competitive elections. [35]

Schumpeter's view of democracy has been described as "elitist", as he criticizes the rationality and knowledge of voters, and expresses a preference for politicians taking decisions. [36] [37] [38] Democracy is therefore in a sense a means to ensure circulation among elites. [37] However, studies by Natasha Piano (of the University of Chicago) emphasize that Schumpeter had substantial disdain for elites. [39] [40]

Entrepreneurship

Schumpeter was probably the first scholar to theorize about entrepreneurship, and the field owed much to his contributions. His fundamental theories are often referred to [41] as Mark I and Mark II. In Mark I, Schumpeter argued that the innovation and technological change of a nation come from the entrepreneurs, or wild spirits. He coined the word Unternehmergeist, German for "entrepreneur-spirit", and asserted that "... the doing of new things or the doing of things that are already being done in a new way" [42] stemmed directly from the efforts of entrepreneurs.

Schumpeter developed Mark II while a professor at Harvard. Many social economists and popular authors of the day argued that large businesses had a negative effect on the standard of living of ordinary people. Contrary to this prevailing opinion, Schumpeter argued that the agents that drive innovation and the economy are large companies which have the capital to invest in research and development of new products and services and to deliver them to customers more cheaply, thus raising their standard of living. In one of his seminal works, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Schumpeter wrote:

As soon as we go into details and inquire into the individual items in which progress was most conspicuous, the trail leads not to the doors of those firms that work under conditions of comparatively free competition but precisely to the door of the large concerns – which, as in the case of agricultural machinery, also account for much of the progress in the competitive sector – and a shocking suspicion dawns upon us that big business may have had more to do with creating that standard of life than with keeping it down. [43]

As of 2017 Mark I and Mark II arguments are considered complementary. [44]

Cycles and long wave theory

Schumpeter was the most influential thinker to argue that long cycles are caused by innovation, and are an incident of it. His treatise on business cycles developed were based on Kondratiev's ideas which attributed the causes very differently. Schumpeter's treatise brought Kondratiev's ideas to the attention of English-speaking economists. Kondratiev fused important elements that Schumpeter missed. Yet, the Schumpeterian variant of long-cycles hypothesis, stressing the initiating role of innovations, commands the widest attention today. [45] In Schumpeter's view, technological innovation is at the cause of both cyclical instability and economic growth. Fluctuations in innovation cause fluctuation in investment and those cause cycles in economic growth. Schumpeter sees innovations as clustering around certain points in time periods that he refers to as "neighborhoods of equilibrium", when entrepreneurs perceive that risk and returns warrant innovative commitments. These clusters lead to long cycles by generating periods of acceleration in aggregate growth. [46]

The technological view of change needs to demonstrate that changes in the rate of innovation governs changes in the rate of new investments, and that the combined impact of innovation clusters takes the form of fluctuation in aggregate output or employment. The process of technological innovation involves extremely complex relations among a set of key variables: inventions, innovations, diffusion paths and investment activities. The impact of technological innovation on aggregate output is mediated through a succession of relationships that have yet to be explored systematically in the context of long wave. New inventions are typically primitive, their performance is usually poorer than existing technologies and the cost of their production is high. A production technology may not yet exist, as is often the case in major chemical inventions, pharmaceutical inventions. The speed with which inventions are transformed into innovations and diffused depends on actual and expected trajectory of performance improvement and cost reduction. [47]

Innovation

Schumpeter identified innovation as the critical dimension of economic change. [48] He argued that economic change revolves around innovation, entrepreneurial activities, and market power. [49] He sought to prove that innovation-originated market power can provide better results than the invisible hand and price competition. [50] He argued that technological innovation often creates temporary monopolies, allowing abnormal profits that would soon be competed away by rivals and imitators. These temporary monopolies were necessary to provide the incentive for firms to develop new products and processes. [48]

Personal life

He was married three times. [51] His first wife was Gladys Ricarde Seaver, an Englishwoman nearly 12 years his senior (married 1907, separated 1913, divorced 1925). His best man at his wedding was his friend and Austrian jurist Hans Kelsen. His second was Anna Reisinger, 20 years his junior and daughter of the concierge of the apartment where he grew up. As a divorced man, he and his bride converted to Lutheranism in order to marry. [52] They married in 1925, but within a year, she died in childbirth. The loss of his wife and newborn son came only weeks after Schumpeter's mother had died. In 1937, Schumpeter married the American economic historian Elizabeth Boody (1898-1953), who helped him popularize his work and edited what became their magnum opus, the posthumously published History of Economic Analysis. [53]

Schumpeter claimed that he had set himself three goals in life: to be the greatest economist in the world, to be the best horseman in all of Austria and the greatest lover in all of Vienna. He said he had reached two of his goals, but he never said which two, [54] [55] although he is reported to have said that there were too many fine horsemen in Austria for him to succeed in all his aspirations. [56] [57]

Later life and death

Schumpeter died in his home in Taconic, Connecticut, at the age of 66, on the night of 7 January 1950. [58]

Legacy

For some time after his death, Schumpeter's views were most influential among various heterodox economists, especially European, who were interested in industrial organization, evolutionary theory, and economic development, and who tended to be on the other end of the political spectrum from Schumpeter and were also often influenced by Keynes, Karl Marx, and Thorstein Veblen. Robert Heilbroner was one of Schumpeter's most renowned pupils, who wrote extensively about him in The Worldly Philosophers . In the journal Monthly Review , John Bellamy Foster wrote of that journal's founder Paul Sweezy, one of the leading Marxist economists in the United States and a graduate assistant of Schumpeter's at Harvard, that Schumpeter "played a formative role in his development as a thinker". [59] Other outstanding students of Schumpeter's include the economists Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen and Hyman Minsky and John Kenneth Galbraith and former chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan. [60] Future Nobel Laureate Robert Solow was his student at Harvard, and he expanded on Schumpeter's theory. [61]

Today, Schumpeter has a following outside standard textbook economics, in areas such as economic policy, management studies, industrial policy, and the study of innovation. Schumpeter was probably the first scholar to develop theories about entrepreneurship. For instance, the European Union's innovation program, and its main development plan, the Lisbon Strategy, are influenced by Schumpeter. The International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society awards the Schumpeter Prize.

The Schumpeter School of Business and Economics opened in October 2008 at the University of Wuppertal, Germany. According to University President Professor Lambert T. Koch, "Schumpeter will not only be the name of the Faculty of Management and Economics, but this is also a research and teaching programme related to Joseph A. Schumpeter." [62]

On 17 September 2009, The Economist inaugurated a column on business and management named "Schumpeter." [63] The publication has a history of naming columns after significant figures or symbols in the covered field, including naming its British affairs column after former editor Walter Bagehot and its European affairs column after Charlemagne. The initial Schumpeter column praised him as a "champion of innovation and entrepreneurship" whose writing showed an understanding of the benefits and dangers of business that proved to be far ahead of its time. [63]

Major works

Books

Translated as: Schumpeter, Joseph A. (2010). The nature and essence of economic theory. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. ISBN   9781412811507. Translated by: Bruce A. McDaniel

Journal articles

Memoriams

Reviews

See also

Related Research Articles

The economic calculation problem is a criticism of using economic planning as a substitute for market-based allocation of the factors of production. It was first proposed by Ludwig von Mises in his 1920 article "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth" and later expanded upon by Friedrich Hayek.

Kondratiev wave Hypothesized cycle-like phenomena in the modern world economy

In economics, Kondratiev waves are hypothesized cycle-like phenomena in the modern world economy.

Economic history history studies focused on economics

Economic history is the academic study of economies or economic events of the past. Research is conducted using a combination of historical methods, statistical methods and the application of economic theory to historical situations and institutions. The field can encompass a wide variety of topics, including equality, finance, technology, labor, and business. It emphasizes historicizing the economy itself, analyzing it as a dynamic force and attempting to provide insights into the way it is structured and conceived.

Creative destruction Concept in economic theory

Creative destruction, sometimes known as Schumpeter's gale, is a concept in economics which since the 1950s has become most readily identified with the Austrian-born economist Joseph Schumpeter who derived it from the work of Karl Marx and popularized it as a theory of economic innovation and the business cycle.

The business cycle, also known as the economic cycle or trade cycle, is the downward and upward movement of gross domestic product (GDP) around its long-term growth trend. The length of a business cycle is the period of time containing a single boom and contraction in sequence. These fluctuations typically involve shifts over time between periods of relatively rapid economic growth and periods of relative stagnation or decline.

The historical school of economics was an approach to academic economics and to public administration that emerged in the 19th century in Germany, and held sway there until well into the 20th century. The professors involved compiled massive economic histories of Germany and Europe. Numerous Americans were their students. The school was opposed by theoretical economists. Prominent leaders included Gustav von Schmoller (1838–1917), and Max Weber (1864–1920) in Germany, and Joseph Schumpeter (1883–1950) in Austria and the United States.

Simon Kuznets economist

Simon Smith Kuznets was an American economist and statistician who received the 1971 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences "for his empirically founded interpretation of economic growth which has led to new and deepened insight into the economic and social structure and process of development."

Nikolai Kondratiev Russian economist

Nikolai Dmitriyevich Kondratiev was a Soviet economist and proponent of the New Economic Policy (NEP) best known for the business cycle theory known as Kondratiev waves.

Wesley Clair Mitchell American statistician

Wesley Clair Mitchell was an American economist known for his empirical work on business cycles and for guiding the National Bureau of Economic Research in its first decades.

Gottfried von Haberler was an Austrian-American economist. He worked in particular on international trade. One of his major contributions was reformulating the Ricardian idea of comparative advantage in a neoclassical framework, abandoning the labor theory of value for an opportunity cost concept.

An economic ideology distinguishes itself from economic theory in being normative rather than just explanatory in its approach. Economic ideologies express perspectives on the way an economy should run and to what end, whereas the aim of economic theories is to create accurate explanatory models to describe how an economy currently functions. However, the two are closely interrelated, as underlying economic ideology influences the methodology and theory employed in analysis. The diverse ideology and methodology of the 74 Nobel laureates in economics speaks to such interrelation.

New classical macroeconomics, sometimes simply called new classical economics, is a school of thought in macroeconomics that builds its analysis entirely on a neoclassical framework. Specifically, it emphasizes the importance of rigorous foundations based on microeconomics, especially rational expectations.

Innovation economics is a growing economic theory that emphasizes entrepreneurship and innovation. In his 1942 book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, economist Joseph Schumpeter introduced the notion of an innovation economy. He argued that evolving institutions, entrepreneurs and technological changes were at the heart of economic growth. However, it is only in recent years that "innovation economy," grounded in Schumpeter's ideas, has become a mainstream concept".

<i>Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy</i> book on economics by Joseph Schumpeter

Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy is a book on economics and on other sciences such as sociology and history by Joseph Schumpeter, arguably the most or one of the most famous, debated and important books by Schumpeter, and one of the most famous, debated and important books on social theory, social sciences and economics, in which he deals with capitalism, socialism and creative destruction.

Richard M. Goodwin was an American mathematician and economist.

History of macroeconomic thought Wikimedia history article

Macroeconomic theory has its origins in the study of business cycles and monetary theory. In general, early theorists believed monetary factors could not affect real factors such as real output. John Maynard Keynes attacked some of these "classical" theories and produced a general theory that described the whole economy in terms of aggregates rather than individual, microeconomic parts. Attempting to explain unemployment and recessions, he noticed the tendency for people and businesses to hoard cash and avoid investment during a recession. He argued that this invalidated the assumptions of classical economists who thought that markets always clear, leaving no surplus of goods and no willing labor left idle.

Dr Redvers Opie (1900-1984) was a British economist. Educated at Durham University, he taught at Oxford University where he eventually became the Bursar of Magdalen College. He later went on to do a PhD at Harvard University, where he became a member of the teaching staff. On the recommendation of John Maynard Keynes, he became the United Kingdom Treasury representative in Washington, D.C., as Counsellor and economic adviser at the British Embassy, 1939–46, and was one of the five members of the UK delegation to the Bretton Woods Conference, which gave birth to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

Throughout modern history, a variety of perspectives on capitalism have evolved based on different schools of thought.

Crisis theory, concerning the causes and consequences of the tendency for the rate of profit to fall in a capitalist system, is now generally associated with Marxist economics.

Demand-side economics is a macroeconomic theory which maintains that economic growth and full employment are most effectively created by high demand for products and services. According to demand-side economics, output is determined by effective demand. High consumer spending leads to business expansion, resulting in greater employment opportunities. Higher levels of employment create a multiplier effect that further stimulates aggregate demand, leading to greater economic growth.

References

  1. Tobin, James (1986). "James Tobin". In Breit, William; Spencer, Roger W. (eds.). Lives of the Laureates, Seven Nobel Economists. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: MIT Press. Archived from the original on August 26, 2003.
  2. McCulloch, Rachel. "Interview with Anne Carter".
  3. "Joseph Alois Schumpeter: Biography". Library of Economics and Liberty. Econlib.org. Retrieved 19 December 2019.
  4. Westland, J. Christopher (2016). Global Innovation Management. Macmillan International. p. 192. ISBN   9781137520197 . Retrieved 19 December 2019.
  5. Topol, Eric (2012). The Creative Destruction of Medicine: How the Digital Revolution Will Create Better Health Care . Basic Books. p.  v. ISBN   9780465025503 . Retrieved 19 December 2019. popularized the term creative destruction.
  6. Stone, Brad; Vance, Ashlee (January 25, 2009). "$200 Laptops Break a Business Model". New York Times. Retrieved 2010-09-21. Indeed, Silicon Valley may be one of the few places where businesses are still aware of the ideas of Josephine Schumpeter, an economist from Austria who wrote about business cycles during the first half of the last century. He said the lifeblood of capitalism was 'creative destruction.' Companies rising and falling would unleash innovation and in the end make the economy stronger.
  7. 1 2 3 Allen, Robert Loring (1991). Opening Doors: the Life and Work of Joseph Schumpeter: Europe (Volume 1). ASIN   B00ZY8X8D4.
  8. Reisman, David A. (2004). Schumpeter's Market: Enterprise and Evolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 4. ISBN   9781845420857 . Retrieved 19 December 2019.
  9. Shionoya, Yuichi (2007). Schumpeter and the Idea of Social Science: A Metatheoretical Study. Cambridge University Press. p. 14. ISBN   9780521037969 . Retrieved 19 December 2019.
  10. Seidl, Christian (1994). "The Bauer-Schumpeter Controversy on Socialisation". History of Economic Ideas. Accademia Editoriale. 2 (2): 54–67. JSTOR   23722217.
  11. Allen, Robert Loring (1991). Opening Doors: The Life and Work of Joseph Schumpeter . Transaction. pp.  186–89. ISBN   9781412815611 . Retrieved 19 December 2019. Schumpeter Biedermann Bank.
  12. McCraw, Prophet of Innovation, pp. 231–32.
  13. McCraw, pp. 317–21
  14. Entrepreneurship, Competitiveness and Local Development. (Iandoli, Landström and Raffa, 2007, p. 5)
  15. McCraw, pp. 337–43
  16. McCraw, Prophet of Innovation, pp. 210–17.
  17. McCraw, pp. 273–78. 306–11.
  18. McCraw p. 347 et seq.
  19. "PG Michaelides, The Influence of the German Historical School on Schumpeter, 17th International Conference of the European Association for. Evolutionary Political Economy, Bremen/Germany, November 2005" (PDF).
  20. Michaelides, Panayotis G. (2009). "Joseph Schumpeter and the German Historical School". Cambridge Journal of Economics. 33 (3): 495–516. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.903.6952 . doi:10.1093/cje/ben052.
  21. "Fabrice Dennequin, 2012, "L'influence de l'eugénisme galtonien dans la pensée de Joseph Alois Schumpeter." Papers in Political Economy 46".
  22. (Freeman, 2009; p. 126) in Techno-economic paradigms: essays in honor of Carlota Perez. Edited by Wolfgang Drechsler, Erik Reinert, Rainer Kattel.
  23. Schumpeter, Joseph (1954). History of Economic Analysis. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  24. "Phases of the Marginalist Revolution". HET. Archived from the original on 2013-05-26. Retrieved 2015-05-09.
  25. Timberlake, Richard (August 2005). "Gold Standards and the Real Bills Doctrine in U.S. Monetary Policy" (PDF). Econ Journal Watch. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-09-10. Retrieved 2010-09-21.
  26. Schumpeter, J.A. The theory of economic development : an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle translated from the German by Redvers Opie (1961) New York: OUP
  27. Recent research suggests that the Kuznets swing could be regarded as the third harmonic of the Kondratiev wave – see Korotayev, Andrey V., & Tsirel, Sergey V. A Spectral Analysis of World GDP Dynamics: Kondratieff Waves, Kuznets Swings, Juglar and Kitchin Cycles in Global Economic Development, and the 2008–2009 Economic Crisis. Structure and Dynamics. 2010. Vol.4. #1. pp. 3–57.
  28. John Medearis, "Schumpeter, the New Deal, and Democracy", The American Political Science Review, 1997.
  29. Heertje, Arnold (1981). Schumpeter's Vision: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy After 40 years. New York, New York: Praeger. pp. 50–54.
  30. Schumpeter, Joseph (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1st ed.). Harper and Brothers. p.  252.
  31. 1 2 Przeworski, Adam (1999). Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense. Cambridge University Press.
  32. 1 2 Barany, Professor Zoltan; Barany, Zoltan; Moser, Robert G. (2001-08-27). Russian Politics: Challenges of Democratization. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   9780521805124.
  33. Bidner, Chris; Francois, Patrick; Trebbi, Francesco (2014). "A Theory of Minimalist Democracy".Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  34. "Elections Without Democracy: Thinking About Hybrid Regimes". Journal of Democracy. Retrieved 2019-10-20.
  35. 1 2 Munck, Gerardo L. (2009). Measuring Democracy: A Bridge between Scholarship and Politics. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN   9780801896507.
  36. Piano, Natasha (2019-01-16). "Revisiting Democratic Elitism: The Italian School of Elitism, American Political Science, and the Problem of Plutocracy". The Journal of Politics. 81 (2): 524–538. doi:10.1086/701636. ISSN   0022-3816.
  37. 1 2 Munck, Gerardo Luis; Munck, Professor Gerardo L. (2007). Regimes and Democracy in Latin America: Theories and Methods. Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780199219902.
  38. Posner, Richard. Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Harvard University Press. pp. 183–184.
  39. Piano, Natasha (2019-04-01). "Revisiting Democratic Elitism: The Italian School of Elitism, American Political Science, and the Problem of Plutocracy". The Journal of Politics. 81 (2): 524–538. doi:10.1086/701636. ISSN   0022-3816.
  40. Piano, Natasha (2017-10-02). ""Schumpeterianism" Revised: The Critique of Elites in Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy". Critical Review. 29 (4): 505–529. doi:10.1080/08913811.2017.1458501. ISSN   0891-3811.
  41. Fontana, Roberto; et al. (2012). "Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and the sources of breakthrough inventions: Evidence from a Data-Set of R&D Awards" (PDF). School of Economics and Management, Technical University of Lisbon, Department of Economics. WP 24/2012/DE/UECE WORKING PAPERS ISSN Nº 0874-4548: 2–37.
  42. Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). "The Creative Response in Economic History". Journal of Economic History. 7 (2): 149–59. doi:10.1017/s0022050700054279.
  43. Schumpeter, Joseph (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Roe Publishers. p. 82.
  44. Fontana, Roberto; et al. (2012). "Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and the sources of breakthrough inventions: Evidence from a Data-Set of R&D Awards" (PDF). School of Economics and Management, Technical University of Lisbon, Department of Economics. WP 24/2012/DE/UECE WORKING PAPERS ISSN Nº 0874-4548: 2–37.
  45. Freeman, Christopher, ed. Long Wave Theory, International Library of Critical Writings in Economics: Edward Elgar, 1996
  46. Rosenberg, Nathan. "Technological Innovation and Long Waves." In Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History, 62–84. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  47. Mansfield, Edwin (May 1983). "Long Waves and Technological Innovation". The American Economic Review. 73 (2): 141–45. JSTOR   1816829.
  48. 1 2 Pol, Eduardo; Carroll, Peter (2006). An introduction to economics with emphasis on innovation. Thomson Custom Publishing for University of Wollongong. ISBN   9780170133005.
  49. Ziemnowicz, Christopher (2020). "Joseph A. Schumpeter and Innovation". In Carayannis, Elias G. (ed.). Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (Second ed.). Springer. ISBN   9783319153469.
  50. Nakamura, Leonard I. (July 2000). "Economics and the New Economy: The Invisible Hand Meets Creative Destruction" (PDF). Business Review - Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia: 15–30. Retrieved 19 December 2019.
  51. Hawthorn, Geoffrey (27 February 1992). "Schumpeter the Superior". London Review of Books. 14 (4). Retrieved 19 December 2019.
  52. Swedberg, Richard (2013). Joseph A. Schumpeter: His Life and Work. John Wiley & Sons. p. 1894. ISBN   9780745668703 . Retrieved 19 December 2019.
  53. Andersen, Esben S. (2011). Joseph A. Schumpeter: a theory of social and economic evolution. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN   9781403996275.
  54. George Viksnins. Professor of Economics. Georgetown University. Economic Systems in Historical Perspective
  55. Schumpeter's Diary as quoted in "Prophet of Innovation" by Thomas McCraw, p. 4.
  56. P.A. Samuelson and W.D. Nordhaus, Economics (1998, p. 178)
  57. Humphrey, Thomas M. "Analyst of Change" (PDF). Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Retrieved 12 May 2019.
  58. Giersch, H. (May 1984). "The Age of Schumpeter". The American Economic Review. American Economic Association. 74 (2): 103–09. JSTOR   1816338.
  59. Foster, John Bellamy (May 2008). "Sweezy in Perspective". Monthly Review. Retrieved 2010-09-21.
  60. Greenspan, Alan (2007). The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World . Penguin Press. p.  48. ISBN   978-1-59420-131-8. I've watched the process [creative destruction] at work through my entire career,
  61. Thoma, Mark (2007-05-17). "Robert Solow on Joseph Schumpeter". Economistsview.typepad.com. Retrieved 2010-09-21.
  62. "Opening ceremony: Schumpeter School of Business and Economics". University of Wuppertal. 8 July 2011. Archived from the original on 1 October 2011.
  63. 1 2 "Schumpeter: Taking flight". The Economist. 17 September 2009. Retrieved 19 December 2019.

Further reading

Political offices
Preceded by
Otto Steinwender  [ de ]
Finance Minister of Austria
1919
Succeeded by
Richard Reisch  [ de ]