Judicial review

Last updated

Judicial review is a process under which executive or legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary. A court with authority for judicial review may invalidate laws, acts and governmental actions that are incompatible with a higher authority: an executive decision may be invalidated for being unlawful or a statute may be invalidated for violating the terms of a constitution. Judicial review is one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers: the power of the judiciary to supervise the legislative and executive branches when the latter exceed their authority. The doctrine varies between jurisdictions, so the procedure and scope of judicial review may differ between and within countries.


General principles

Judicial review can be understood in the context of two distinct—but parallel—legal systems, civil law and common law, and also by two distinct theories of democracy regarding the manner in which government should be organized with respect to the principles and doctrines of legislative supremacy and the separation of powers.

First, two distinct legal systems, civil law and common law, have different views about judicial review. Common-law judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. In the civil-law tradition, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles.

Secondly, the idea of separation of powers is another theory about how a democratic society's government should be organized. In contrast to legislative supremacy, the idea of separation of powers was first introduced by Montesquieu; [1] it was later institutionalized in the United States by the Supreme Court ruling in Marbury v. Madison under the court of John Marshall. Separation of powers is based on the idea that no branch of government should be able to exert power over any other branch without due process of law; each branch of government should have a check on the powers of the other branches of government, thus creating a regulative balance among all branches of government. The key to this idea is checks and balances. In the United States, judicial review is considered a key check on the powers of the other two branches of government by the judiciary.

Differences in organizing democratic societies led to different views regarding judicial review, with societies based on common law and those stressing a separation of powers being the most likely to utilize judicial review.[ citation needed ] Nevertheless, many countries whose legal systems are based on the idea of legislative supremacy have gradually adopted or expanded the scope of judicial review, including countries from both the civil law and common law traditions.

Another reason why judicial review should be understood in the context of both the development of two distinct legal systems (civil law and common law) and two theories of democracy (legislative supremacy and separation of powers) is that some countries with common-law systems do not have judicial review of primary legislation. Though a common-law system is present in the United Kingdom, the country still has a strong attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy; consequently, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down primary legislation. However, since the United Kingdom became a member of the European Union there has been tension between its tendency toward legislative supremacy and the EU's legal system, which specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review.

Administrative acts

Most modern legal systems allow the courts to review administrative acts (individual decisions of a public body, such as a decision to grant a subsidy or to withdraw a residence permit). In most systems, this also includes review of secondary legislation (legally enforceable rules of general applicability adopted by administrative bodies). Some countries (notably France and Germany) have implemented a system of administrative courts which are charged with resolving disputes between members of the public and the administration. In other countries (including the United States and United Kingdom), judicial review is carried out by regular civil courts although it may be delegated to specialized panels within these courts (such as the Administrative Court within the High Court of England and Wales). The United States employs a mixed system in which some administrative decisions are reviewed by the United States district courts (which are the general trial courts), some are reviewed directly by the United States courts of appeals and others are reviewed by specialized tribunals such as the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (which, despite its name, is not technically part of the federal judicial branch). It is quite common that before a request for judicial review of an administrative act is filed with a court, certain preliminary conditions (such as a complaint to the authority itself) must be fulfilled. In most countries, the courts apply special procedures in administrative cases.

Primary legislation

There are three broad approaches to judicial review of the constitutionality of primary legislation—that is, laws passed directly by an elected legislature.

No review by any courts

Some countries do not permit a review of the validity of primary legislation. In the United Kingdom, Acts of Parliament cannot be set aside under the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, whereas Orders in Council, another type of primary legislation not passed by Parliament, can (see Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service (1985) and Miller/Cherry (2019)). Another example is the Netherlands, where the constitution expressly forbids the courts to rule on the question of constitutionality of primary legislation. [2]

Review by general courts

In the United States, federal and state courts (at all levels, both appellate and trial) are able to review and declare the "constitutionality", or agreement with the Constitution (or lack thereof) of legislation by a process of judicial interpretation that is relevant to any case properly within their jurisdiction. In American legal language, "judicial review" refers primarily to the adjudication of constitutionality of statutes, especially by the Supreme Court of the United States. This is commonly held to have been established in the case of Marbury v. Madison, which was argued before the Supreme Court in 1803. A similar system was also adopted in Australia. [3]

Review by a specialized court

In 1920, Czechoslovakia adopted a system of judicial review by a specialized court, the Constitutional Court as written by Hans Kelsen, a leading jurist of the time. This system was later adopted by Austria and became known as the Austrian System , also under the primary authorship of Hans Kelsen, being emulated by a number of other countries. In these systems, other courts are not competent to question the constitutionality of primary legislation; they often may, however, initiate the process of review by the Constitutional Court. [4]

Russia adopts a mixed model since (as in the US) courts at all levels, both federal and state, are empowered to review primary legislation and declare its constitutionality; as in the Czech Republic, there is a constitutional court in charge of reviewing the constitutionality of primary legislation. The difference is that in the first case, the decision about the law's adequacy to the Russian Constitution only binds the parties to the lawsuit; in the second, the Court's decision must be followed by judges and government officials at all levels.

Judicial review by country

External image
Searchtool.svg Constitutional review models around the world (map)

[5] [6]

CountryConstitutional CourtHigh CourtConstitutional CouncilOther formNo judicial review
Flag of Afghanistan.svg  Afghanistan HC-AM
Flag of Albania.svg  Albania CC-EM
Flag of Algeria.svg  Algeria CN-FM
Flag of Andorra.svg  Andorra CC-EM
Flag of Angola.svg  Angola CC-EM
Flag of Antigua and Barbuda.svg  Antigua and Barbuda HC-AM
Flag of Argentina.svg  Argentina HC-AM
Flag of Armenia.svg  Armenia CC-EM
Flag of Australia (converted).svg  Australia ELSE
Flag of Austria.svg  Austria CC-EM
Flag of Azerbaijan.svg  Azerbaijan CC-EM
Flag of the Bahamas.svg  Bahamas HC-AM
Flag of Bahrain.svg  Bahrain W/O
Flag of Bangladesh.svg  Bangladesh HC-AM
Flag of Barbados.svg  Barbados HC-AM
Flag of Belarus.svg  Belarus CC-EM
Flag of Belgium (civil).svg  Belgium HC-EM
Flag of Belize.svg  Belize HC-AM
Flag of Benin.svg  Benin CC-EM
Flag of Bhutan.svg  Bhutan
Flag of Bolivia.svg  Bolivia HC-AM
Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina.svg  Bosnia and Herzegovina CC-EM
Flag of Botswana.svg  Botswana HC-AM
Flag of Brazil.svg  Brazil HC-MX
Flag of Brunei.svg  Brunei W/O
Flag of Bulgaria.svg  Bulgaria CC-EM
Flag of Burkina Faso.svg  Burkina Faso HC-EM
Flag of Burundi.svg  Burundi CC-EM
Flag of Cambodia.svg  Cambodia CN-EM
Flag of Cameroon.svg  Cameroon HC-EM
Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg  Canada HC-MX
Flag of Cape Verde.svg  Cape Verde HC-MX
Flag of the Central African Republic.svg  Central African Republic CC-EM
Flag of Chad.svg  Chad HC-EM
Flag of Chile.svg  Chile CC-EM
Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg  People's Republic of China (PRC)W/O
Flag of Colombia.svg  Colombia CC-MX
Flag of the Comoros.svg  Comoros CN-FM
Flag of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.svg  Democratic Republic of the Congo HC-EM
Flag of the Republic of the Congo.svg  Republic of the Congo ELSE
Flag of Costa Rica.svg  Costa Rica HC-EM
Flag of Croatia.svg  Croatia CC-EM
Flag of Cuba.svg  Cuba W/O
Flag of Cyprus.svg  Cyprus HC-AM
Flag of the Czech Republic.svg  Czech Republic CC-EM
Flag of Denmark.svg  Denmark HC-AM
Flag of Djibouti.svg  Djibouti CN-FM
Flag of Dominica.svg  Dominica HC-AM
Flag of the Dominican Republic.svg  Dominican Republic HC-AM
Flag of East Timor.svg  East Timor
Flag of Ecuador.svg  Ecuador CC-MX
Flag of Egypt.svg  Egypt CC-EM
Flag of El Salvador.svg  El Salvador HC-MX
Flag of Equatorial Guinea.svg  Equatorial Guinea CC-EM
Flag of Eritrea.svg  Eritrea HC-EM
Flag of Estonia.svg  Estonia HC-AM
Flag of Ethiopia.svg  Ethiopia ELSE
Flag of Fiji.svg  Fiji ELSE
Flag of Finland.svg  Finland ELSE
Flag of France.svg  France CN-FM
Flag of Gabon.svg  Gabon CC-EM
Flag of The Gambia.svg  Gambia HC-AM
Flag of Georgia.svg  Georgia HC-AM
Flag of Germany.svg  Germany CC-EM
Flag of Ghana.svg  Ghana HC-AM
Flag of Greece.svg  Greece HC-MX
Flag of Grenada.svg  Grenada HC-AM
Flag of Guatemala.svg  Guatemala CC-MX
Flag of Guinea.svg  Guinea HC-AM
Flag of Guinea-Bissau.svg  Guinea-Bissau W/O
Flag of Guyana.svg  Guyana HC-AM
Flag of Haiti.svg  Haiti HC-AM
Flag of Honduras.svg  Honduras HC-MX
Flag of Hong Kong.svg  Hong Kong ELSE
Flag of Hungary.svg  Hungary CC-EM
Flag of Iceland.svg  Iceland HC-EM
Flag of India.svg  India HC-AM
Flag of Indonesia.svg  Indonesia HC-MX
Flag of Iran.svg  Iran CN-FM
Flag of Iraq.svg  Iraq W/O
Flag of Ireland.svg  Ireland HC-AM
Flag of Israel.svg  Israel HC-AM
Flag of Italy.svg  Italy CC-EM
Flag of Cote d'Ivoire.svg  Ivory Coast CN-FM
Flag of Jamaica.svg  Jamaica HC-AM
Flag of Japan.svg  Japan HC-AM
Flag of Jordan.svg  Jordan
Flag of Kazakhstan.svg  Kazakhstan CN-EM
Flag of Kenya.svg  Kenya HC-AM
Flag of Kiribati.svg  Kiribati HC-AM
Flag of Kosovo.svg  Kosovo HC-EM
Flag of Kuwait.svg  Kuwait W/O
Flag of Kyrgyzstan.svg  Kyrgyzstan CC-EM
Flag of Laos.svg  Laos W/O
Flag of Latvia.svg  Latvia CC-EM
Flag of Lebanon.svg  Lebanon CN-EM
Flag of Lesotho.svg  Lesotho W/O
Flag of Liberia.svg  Liberia W/O
Flag of Libya.svg  Libya W/O
Flag of Liechtenstein.svg  Liechtenstein HC-EM
Flag of Lithuania.svg  Lithuania CC-EM
Flag of Luxembourg.svg  Luxembourg CC-EM
Flag of North Macedonia.svg  Macedonia CC-EM
Flag of Madagascar.svg  Madagascar CC-EM
Flag of Malaysia.svg  Malaysia HC-AM
Flag of Malawi.svg  Malawi HC-AM
Flag of Maldives.svg  Maldives W/O
Flag of Mali.svg  Mali CC-EM
Flag of Malta.svg  Malta CC-EM
Flag of the Marshall Islands.svg  Marshall Islands HC-AM
Flag of Mauritania.svg  Mauritania CN-EM
Flag of Mauritius.svg  Mauritius ELSE
Flag of Mexico.svg  Mexico HC-AM
Flag of Federated States of Micronesia.svg  Micronesia HC-AM
Flag of Moldova.svg  Moldova CC-EM
Flag of Monaco.svg  Monaco HC-EM
Flag of Mongolia.svg  Mongolia CC-EM
Flag of Montenegro.svg  Montenegro CC-EM
Flag of Morocco.svg  Morocco CN-FM
Flag of Mozambique.svg  Mozambique CN-FM
Flag of Myanmar.svg  Myanmar ELSE
Flag of Namibia.svg  Namibia HC-AM
Flag of Nepal.svg    Nepal HC-AM
Flag of the Netherlands.svg  Netherlands W/O
Flag of New Zealand.svg  New Zealand HC-AM
Flag of Nicaragua.svg  Nicaragua HC-EM
Flag of Niger.svg  Niger HC-EM
Flag of Nigeria.svg  Nigeria HC-AM
Flag of North Korea.svg  North Korea (DPRK)W/O
Flag of Norway.svg  Norway HC-AM
Flag of Oman.svg  Oman W/O
Flag of Pakistan.svg  Pakistan ELSE
Flag of Palau.svg  Palau HC-AM
Flag of Panama.svg  Panama HC-EM
Flag of Papua New Guinea.svg  Papua New Guinea HC-AM
Flag of Paraguay.svg  Paraguay HC-EM
Flag of Peru.svg  Peru CC-MX
Flag of the Philippines.svg  Philippines HC-EM
Flag of Poland.svg  Poland CC-EM
Flag of Portugal.svg  Portugal CC-MX
Flag of Qatar.svg  Qatar W/O
Flag of Romania.svg  Romania CC-EM
Flag of Russia.svg  Russia CC-EM
Flag of Rwanda.svg  Rwanda CC-EM
Flag of Saint Kitts and Nevis.svg  Saint Kitts and Nevis HC-AM
Flag of Saint Lucia.svg  Saint Lucia HC-AM
Flag of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.svg  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines HC-AM
Flag of Samoa.svg  Samoa HC-AM
Flag of San Marino.svg  San Marino CC-EM
Flag of Sao Tome and Principe.svg  São Tomé and Príncipe ELSE
Flag of Saudi Arabia.svg  Saudi Arabia W/O
Flag of Senegal.svg  Senegal CN-EM
Flag of Serbia.svg  Serbia CC-EM
Flag of the Seychelles.svg  Seychelles HC-AM
Flag of Sierra Leone.svg  Sierra Leone HC-AM
Flag of Singapore.svg  Singapore HC-AM
Flag of Slovakia.svg  Slovakia CC-EM
Flag of Slovenia.svg  Slovenia CC-EM
Flag of the Solomon Islands.svg  Solomon Islands HC-AM
Flag of Somalia.svg  Somalia
Flag of South Africa.svg  South Africa CC-EM
Flag of South Korea.svg  South Korea CC-EM
Flag of South Sudan.svg  South Sudan
Flag of Spain.svg  Spain CC-EM
Flag of Sri Lanka.svg  Sri Lanka CC-EM
Flag of Sudan.svg  Sudan HC-EM
Flag of Suriname.svg  Suriname CC-EM
Flag of Eswatini.svg  Swaziland HC-AM
Flag of Sweden.svg  Sweden HC-AM
Flag of Switzerland.svg   Switzerland HC-MX
Flag of Syria.svg  Syria CC-EM
Flag of the Republic of China.svg  Taiwan (Republic of China, ROC)HC-MX
Flag of Tajikistan.svg  Tajikistan CC-EM
Flag of Tanzania.svg  Tanzania HC-AM
Flag of Thailand.svg  Thailand CC-EM
Flag of Togo.svg  Togo CC-EM
Flag of Tonga.svg  Tonga HC-AM
Flag of Trinidad and Tobago.svg  Trinidad and Tobago HC-AM
Flag of Tunisia.svg  Tunisia W/O
Flag of Turkey.svg  Turkey CC-EM
Flag of Turkmenistan.svg  Turkmenistan W/O
Flag of Tuvalu.svg  Tuvalu HC-AM
Flag of Uganda.svg  Uganda HC-EM
Flag of Ukraine.svg  Ukraine CC-EM
Flag of the United Arab Emirates.svg  United Arab Emirates ELSE
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg  United Kingdom ELSE
Flag of the United States.svg  United States HC-AM
Flag of Uruguay.svg  Uruguay HC-EM
Flag of Uzbekistan.svg  Uzbekistan CC-EM
Flag of Vanuatu.svg  Vanuatu HC-AM
Flag of the Vatican City.svg   Vatican City W/O
Flag of Venezuela.svg  Venezuela HC-MX
Flag of Vietnam.svg  Vietnam W/O
Flag of Yemen.svg  Yemen HC-EM
Flag of Zambia.svg  Zambia HC-EM
Flag of Zimbabwe.svg  Zimbabwe ELSE

In specific jurisdictions

See also

Related Research Articles

Administrative law is the body of law that governs the activities of administrative agencies of government. Government agency action can include rule making, adjudication, or the enforcement of a specific regulatory agenda. Administrative law is considered a branch of public law.

Constitutional law body of law

Constitutional law is a body of law which defines the role, powers, and structure of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the parliament or legislature, and the judiciary; as well as the basic rights of citizens and, in federal countries such as the United States and Canada, the relationship between the central government and state, provincial, or territorial governments.

Federal government of Nigeria National government of Nigeria

The federal government of Nigeria is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the Constitution of Nigeria in the National Assembly, the President, and the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, respectively.

The separation of powers is a model for the governance of a state. Under this model, a state's government is divided into branches, each with separate, independent powers and responsibilities so that powers of one branch are not in conflict with those of the other branches. The typical division is into three branches: a legislature, an executive, and a judiciary, which is the trias politica model. It can be contrasted with the fusion of powers in parliamentary and semi-presidential systems, where the executive and legislative branches overlap.

Legislation is law which has been promulgated by a legislature or other governing body or the process of making it. Before an item of legislation becomes law it may be known as a bill, and may be broadly referred to as "legislation", while it remains under consideration to distinguish it from other business. Legislation can have many purposes: to regulate, to authorize, to outlaw, to provide (funds), to sanction, to grant, to declare or to restrict. It may be contrasted with a non-legislative act which is adopted by an executive or administrative body under the authority of a legislative act or for implementing a legislative act.

Judicial independence is the concept that the judiciary should be independent from the other branches of government. That is, courts should not be subject to improper influence from the other branches of government or from private or partisan interests. Judicial independence is important to the idea of separation of powers.

Law of Russia

The primary and fundamental statement of laws in the Russian Federation is the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

The doctrine of nondelegation is the theory that one branch of government must not authorize another entity to exercise the power or function which it is constitutionally authorized to exercise itself. It is explicit or implicit in all written constitutions that impose a strict structural separation of powers. It is usually applied in questions of constitutionally improper delegations of powers of any of the three branches of government to either of the other, to the administrative state, or to private entities. Although it is usually constitutional for executive officials to delegate executive powers to executive branch subordinates, there can also be improper delegations of powers within an executive branch.

<i>Ultra vires</i> Legal concept meaning powers are exceeded

Ultra vires is a Latin phrase meaning "beyond the powers". An act which requires legal authority but is done without it, is characterised in law as ultra vires. Its opposite, an act done under proper authority, is intra vires. Acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed "valid" and those that are ultra vires "invalid".

Constitutional theory is an area of constitutional law that focuses on the underpinnings of constitutional government. It overlaps with legal theory, constitutionalism, philosophy of law and democratic theory. It is not limited by country or jurisdiction.

Supreme court highest court in a jurisdiction

The supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts in many legal jurisdictions. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts.

Sources of law are the origins of laws, the binding rules that enable any state to govern its territory.

Constitution of Armenia constitution of Armenia

The Constitution of Armenia was adopted by a nationwide Armenian referendum on July 5, 1995. This constitution established Armenia as a democratic, sovereign, social, and constitutional state. Yerevan is defined as the state's capital. Power is vested in its citizens, who exercise it directly through the election of government representatives. Decisions related to changes in constitutional status or to an alteration of borders are subject to a vote of the citizens of Armenia exercised in a referendum. There are 117 articles in the 1995 constitution. On November 27, 2005, a nationwide constitutional referendum was held and an amended constitution was adopted. The constitution was amended again in a national referendum on December 6, 2015 that changed the political structure from a semi-presidential system to a parliamentary republic.

The legal system of Azerbaijan is based on civil law. As the country was a republic of the Soviet Union until 1991, its legal history has also been influenced heavily by socialist law. However, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Azerbaijan became independent by enactment of the constitutional act of national independence on October 18, 1991. Azerbaijan started reformation of the legal system by the establishing of democratic reforms. This was followed by the adoption of the first Constitution in 1995 which is the foundation of the legislative system of the modern country. The Constitution creates the system of presidential republic with a separation of powers among the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches of the government in order to prevent abuse of power.

The primacy of European Union law is an EU law principle that when there is conflict between European law and the law of Member States, European law prevails; the norms of national law have to be set aside. This principle was developed by the European Court of Justice, and, as interpreted by that court, it means that any norms of European law always take precedence over any norms of national law, including the constitutions of member states. Although national courts generally accept the principle in practice, most of them disagree with this extreme interpretation and reserve the right, in principle, to review the constitutionality of European law under national constitutional law.

The conception of the separation of powers has been applied to the United Kingdom and the nature of its executive, judicial and legislative functions. Historically, the apparent merger of the executive and the legislature, with a powerful Prime Minister drawn from the largest party in parliament and usually with a safe majority, led theorists to contend that the separation of powers is not applicable to the United Kingdom. However, in recent years it does seem to have been adopted as a necessary part of the UK constitution.

Separation of powers in Singapore

Separation of powers in Singapore is founded on the concept of constitutionalism, which is itself primarily based upon distrust of power and thus the desirability of limited government. To achieve this, the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore splits the power to govern the country between three branches of government – the legislature, which makes laws; the executive, which executes them; and the judiciary, which enforces them. Each branch, while wielding legitimate power and being protected from external influences, is subjected to a system of checks and balances by the other branches to prevent abuse of power. This Westminster constitutional model was inherited from the British during Singapore's colonial years.

South African administrative law is the branch of public law in that country which regulates the legal relations of public authorities, whether with private individuals and organisations or with other public authorities, or better say, in present-day South Africa, which regulates "the activities of bodies that exercise public powers or perform public functions, irrespective of whether those bodies are public authorities in a strict sense." According to the Constitutional Court, administrative law is "an incident of the separation of powers under which the courts regulate and control the exercise of public power by the other branches of government."

Parliamentary sovereignty is a concept in the constitutional law of some parliamentary democracies. It holds that the legislative body has absolute sovereignty and is supreme over all other government institutions, including executive or judicial bodies. It also holds that the legislative body may change or repeal any previous legislation and so it is not bound by written law or by precedent.

In parliamentary systems and presidential systems of government, primary legislation and secondary legislation, the latter also called delegated legislation or subordinate legislation, are two forms of law, created respectively by the legislative and executive branches of government. Primary legislation generally consists of statutes, also known as 'acts', that set out broad outlines and principles, but delegate specific authority to an executive branch to make more specific laws under the aegis of the principal act. The executive branch can then issue secondary legislation, creating legally enforceable regulations and the procedures for implementing them.


  1. Montesquieu, Baron Charles de, The Spirit of the Laws
  2. Article 120 of the Netherlands Constitution
  3. Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1 AustLII
  4. The strength of the combination Government - Parliament ... far from outperform the reasons of the Constitutional scrutiny, makes the judicial review more necessary than ever: Buonomo, Giampiero (2006). "Peculato d'uso: perché il condannato non può fare il Sindaco. Dalla Consulta "no" ai Dl senza necessità e urgenza". Diritto&Giustizia edizione online.  via  Questia (subscription required)
  5. Maddex R.L., Constitutions of the World, Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2008, ISBN   978-0-87289-556-0.
  6. "Tables & Map | Concourts".

Further reading