Last updated
Part of Pacific War of World War II
A map outlining the initial Japanese offensive moves against the Soviet Union, with final objective being a line that ran along the western slope of the Greater Khingan Range
Operational scopeStrategic
PlannedSeptember 1941 [1]
Planned byJapanese Imperial General Headquarters
ObjectiveOccupation of Far East of Soviet Union
OutcomeCanceled on August 9, 1941

Kantokuen (Japanese : 関特演, from 関東軍特種演習, Kantōgun Tokushu Enshū, "Kwantung Army Special Maneuvers" [2] ) was an operational plan created by the General Staff of the Imperial Japanese Army for an invasion and occupation of the Russian Far East, capitalizing on the outbreak of the Soviet-German War in June 1941. Involving seven Japanese armies and a major portion of the empire's naval and air forces, it would have been the largest combined arms operation in Japanese history up to that point, and one of the largest of all time. [3]


The plan was approved in part by Emperor Hirohito on July 7 and involved a three-step readiness phase followed by a three-phase offensive to isolate and destroy the Soviet defenders within six months. [4] After growing conflict with simultaneous preparations for an offensive in Southeast Asia, together with the demands of the Second Sino-Japanese War and the dimming prospects for a swift German victory in Europe, Kantokuen fell out of favor at Imperial General Headquarters and was eventually abandoned after increased economic sanctions by the United States and its allies. [5]

Nevertheless, the presence of large Japanese forces in Manchuria forced the Soviets, who had long anticipated an attack there, to keep considerable military resources on standby throughout World War II. [6]


The roots of anti-Soviet sentiment in Imperial Japan existed before the foundation of the Soviet Union itself. Eager to limit tsarist influence in East Asia after the Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905) and then to contain the spread of Bolshevism during the Russian Civil War, the Japanese deployed some 70,000 troops into Siberia from 1918 to 1922 as part of their intervention on the side of the White Movement, occupying Vladivostok and other key points east of Lake Baikal. [7] [8] After the international withdrawal from Russian territory and the establishment of the Soviet regime, the Imperial Japanese Army, mindful of the Soviets' potential as a military power and in keeping with the convention of Russia as a traditional enemy, made contingency plans for a future war. Initially defensive in nature, they envisioned an invasion by the Red Army into Chinese territory that would then be parried by a Japanese counterattack from Korea, with the decisive battlefield being southern Manchuria. [9] After the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, Japanese and Soviet troops found themselves facing one another along a border thousands of kilometers in length. To protect the puppet sate of Manchukuo and to seize the initiative early against the Red Army, the IJA adopted a policy of halting any Soviet advance along the border and fighting the greater part of the war in Siberia, an "epoch-making change" in Japanese strategic thought. The transition from the strategic defensive to the strategic offensive would not be reversed until 1945, when Japan was facing disaster during the Pacific War. Moreover, Japanese plans progressively increased in scope from relatively small-scale operations to gigantic multistage campaigns, which envisioned seizing virtually the entire Soviet Far East as far as Lake Baikal. [10]

1937 and beyond

Japanese-Soviet relations reached a low point by 1937, with an increasing sense of crisis on both sides. [11] The Kwantung Army, Japan's occupation force in Manchuria, was openly hostile to the Soviets and appeared to be spoiling for a fight. That army, which expanded over time from a minor garrison command into a full-fledged army group, acted as a "self-contained, autonomous" entity, which was almost entirely independent from the central government in Tokyo. The Kwantung Army's history was punctuated by a long record of insubordination and unilateral military aggression, which Tokyo often weakly accepted as a fait accompli. As the Kwantung Army's power increased, the Soviet-Japanese border conflict worsened and culminated in the Kanchazu Island incident in which a Soviet river gunboat was sunk by Japanese shore batteries, which killed 37 personnel. [12] Those episodes, together with reciprocal political and military subversion by both sides [lower-alpha 1] led both Soviet and Japanese figures to conclude that a future showdown was likely and even inevitable. [13] [14]

After the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War in July 1937, however, Japanese options in Manchuria suddenly became very limited. The Soviets capitalized on that by signing the Sino-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact with China and supplying it with arms and equipment. Pravda on February 13, 1938, noted:

...the Japanese Army, which possesses a strength of about 1,200,000 men, 2,000 planes, 1,800 tanks, and 4,500 heavy artillery pieces, committed about 1,000,000 troops and a greater part of its arms in China.

Pravda [15]

Despite their predicament, the Japanese continued to formulate war plans against the Soviets, and their operational plan of 1937, though crude and logistically deficient, provided the basis for all subsequent developments until 1944. [16] [lower-alpha 2] The plan called for a sudden initial onslaught against the Soviet Maritime Province facing the Pacific Ocean (also referred to as "Primorye"), coupled with holding actions in the north and west. If the first phase was a success, the other fronts would also transition to the offensive after reinforcements had been received. [17]

Commissar 3rd Class Lyushkov, photographed prior to 1939 G Lyushkov.jpg
Commissar 3rd Class Lyushkov, photographed prior to 1939

While the Japanese were bogged down in China, the Red Army experienced its own disaster. In 1936, Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin began the Great Purge, which killed or incarcerated millions of his own people, including army officers, often on trumped-up or fictitious charges. The Red Army's fighting power was severely weakened, an observation that was seemingly confirmed by relatively poor showings at the Battle of Lake Khasan in 1938 and in the Winter War against Finland in 1940. [18] Fear led some to defect or flee abroad, and on June 13, 1938, Genrikh Lyushkov, Chief of the Far Eastern Department of the NKVD, the Soviet secret police, crossed the border into Manchuria, turned himself in to the IJA, and brought with him a wealth of secret documents on Soviet military strength and dispositions in the region. Lyushkov's defection was a major intelligence coup for Japan, and he continued to work against the Soviets up until he disappeared during the Soviet invasion of Manchuria in August 1945. [19]

The Hachi-Go plans

Independently of their yearly planning, the Operations Bureau of the Japanese Army General Staff and the Kwantung Army co-operated in 1938 and 1939 on a pair of related contingencies under the umbrella term "Operational Plan No. 8," or the "Hachi-Go" plan. Both variants, designated Concepts "A" and "B," examined the possibility of an all-out war with the Soviet Union beginning in 1943. [20] Both were far larger than anything that had been conceived of by the Japanese: against an expected 60 Soviet divisions, the IJA would commit up to 50 of its own that would be delivered incrementally from China and the Home Islands. Concept A followed a more traditional setup by calling for attacks across the eastern and northern borders of Manchuria and maintaining a defensive stance in the west, but Concept B examined the possibility of a first strike into the vast steppe between the Great Khingan Mountains and Lake Baikal in the hopes of scoring a knockout blow early and thus dooming the defenders of Primorye and Vladivostok to defeat in detail. [21] The scope of operations was enormous since both forces would have fought over a front nearly 5,000 kilometers (3,100 miles) long, with Japan's final objectives being up to 1,200 km (750 mi) deep into Soviet territory. In terms of distances, Concept B would have dwarfed even Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941. [lower-alpha 3]

Projected concentration of forces, Hachi-Go concept A
Japan (50 divisions)USSR (60 divisions)
Eastern Front122020152020
Northern Front8131561215
Western Front381591825
Divs not yet arrived279030100
Hachi-Go Concept B Hachi-Go Concept B, 1938-39.png
Hachi-Go Concept B
Projected concentration of forces, Hachi-Go concept B
Japan (45 divisions)USSR (60 divisions)
Eastern Front5810151818
Northern Front381061212
Western Front15202592030
Divs not yet arrived229030100

As impressive as that appeared on paper, however, the Japanese were forced to acknowledge several harsh realities preventing the implementation of Hachi-Go in the near future. Specifically with regard to Concept B, the railway network in Manchuria had not been sufficiently expanded to support such a far-reaching offensive, and the supplies on hand in the country were seriously below the required levels. Furthermore, the ongoing war in China precluded the concentration of the planned 50 divisions without a fatal weakening of the Japanese effort there. In addition, Imperial General Headquarters concluded that to sustain a drive out to Lake Baikal, a fleet of some 200,000 motor vehicles would be necessary, [23] more than twice as many as anything the entire Japanese Army ever had at a given time. [24] Popular support for Concept B dissipated in army circles after the 1939 Battle of Khalkhin Gol demonstrated the extensive challenges of sustaining even a relatively-small force so far away from the nearest railheads. From then on, Japanese offensive planning against the Soviets chiefly focused on the northern and the eastern fronts, with any Western advances being limited to relatively modest gains on the far slope of the Great Khingan range. [25]

Decision 1941

Junbi Jin and "the persimmon"

Soviet Premier Stalin and German Ambassador Ribbentrop shaking hands, 23 August 1939 Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H27337, Moskau, Stalin und Ribbentrop im Kreml.jpg
Soviet Premier Stalin and German Ambassador Ribbentrop shaking hands, 23 August 1939

Toward the end of his life, Adolf Hitler reportedly lamented: "It is certainly regrettable that the Japanese did not enter the war against Soviet Russia alongside us. Had that happened, Stalin's armies would not now be besieging Breslau and the Soviets would not be standing in Budapest. We would together have exterminated Bolshevism before the winter of 1941." [26] From the Japanese perspective, however, Germany's attitude of co-operatimg against the Soviets from 1939 to 1941 was one of ambivalence, even duplicity. [27] After the Japanese defeat at Khalkhin Gol, the sudden unveiling of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact was met with shock and anger in Japan, which viewed the move as a direct violation of the Anti-Comintern Pact and a betrayal of their common interests. Consequently, in April 1941, Japan felt free to conclude the Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact, as tension with the West, particularly the United States, began to mount over the Japanese occupation of Vichy French Indochina the previous year. Amid a barrage of Allied economic sanctions throughout 1940 and 1941, the growing threat of war in the south and the sense of "tranquility" in the north tended to divert Japanese attention away from the long-planned campaign in Siberia. [28] [29] That shift was particularly welcomed by the Imperial Japanese Navy, which traditionally favored a policy of Nanshin-ron (southward expansion) and maintaining a deterrent against the Soviet Union, as opposed to the Hokushin-ron (northward expansion) that was favored by the Imperial Japanese Army. [30]

Yosuke Matsuoka, photographed in 1932 Yohsuke matsuoka1932.jpg
Yosuke Matsuoka, photographed in 1932

Hence, it was with great shock and consternation that the Japanese government met the news of Operation Barbarossa, Hitler's invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941. Prime Minister Fumimaro Konoe, mortified over the "second betrayal" of Japan, even considered leaving the Tripartite Pact. On the other hand, Foreign Minister Yosuke Matsuoka immediately argued that Japan should abandon its Neutrality Pact with the Soviets and launch an attack in conjunction with Germany. [31] Matsuoka's views were supported by both the Kwantung Army and powerful elements of the IJA General Staff, particularly Major General Shin'ichi Tanaka, Chief of the Operations Bureau, who were eager for a "quick decision." [32] Those views came into conflict with Japan's existing flexible response policy, referred to as Junbi Jin Taisei ("Preparatory Formation Setup"). Under the Junbi Jin concept, intervention in the event of a Soviet-German war was contemplated only if events took a favorable turn for Japan. Junbi Jin had been articulated only in June, before the German invasion, but would ultimately withstand the renewed pressures from the "Go North" faction and define Japanese strategic thinking throughout 1941. [33]

Junbi Jin encountered its first serious test in the form of an emergency meeting of the top army and navy leaders on June 24 to establish a new national policy because of the situation in Europe. As a result of the conference, a compromise was reached for the army to be allowed to intervene against the Soviets if circumstances permitted but with the caveat of preparations not interfering with simultaneous planning for war in the south. [34]

Although that arrangement was accepted in principle, there were still disagreements over exactly how the Army would go about resolving the "northern question" and the timing of such a resolution. The basic conflict can be summarized by the popular metaphor of "the persimmon," with the hardliners in the Army General Staff (AGS) and the Kwantung Army arguing for an offensive even if the fruit was "still green" (even if the Soviets had not suffered a catastrophic collapse against Germany) and their opponents were opting for a more conservative approach, they assigned less immediacy to the Manchurian front because of Japan's wider strategic position. [35] The AGS considered that if Japan engaged in hostilities in 1941, it was imperative for the fighting to be over by mid-October because of the bitter climate of Siberia and Northern Manchuria. Because 60–70 days would be necessary to complete operational preparations and 6 to 8 more weeks would be needed to defeat the Soviets in the territory between Manchuria and the Pacific, the window of action was quite limited. In response, the Army General Staff proposed a "crash schedule" for planning purposes intended to "shave off" as much time as possible: [36]

  • 28 June: Decide on mobilization
  • 5 July: Issue mobilization orders
  • 20 July: Begin troop concentration
  • 10 August: Decide on hostilities
  • 24 August: Complete readiness stance
  • 29 August: Concentrate two divisions from North China in Manchuria, bringing the total to 16
  • 5 September: Concentrate four further divisions from the homeland, bringing the total to 22; complete combat stance
  • 10 September (at latest): Commence combat operations
  • 15 October: Complete first phase of war

All in all, the AGS called for 22 divisions with 850,000 men (including auxiliary units) supported by 800,000 tons of shipping to be made ready if war came against the Soviets. [37] Ideally, the Soviets, in their scramble to throw all available forces against Hitler, would have also reduced the strength of their infantry forces in the Far East by half and their armored and air forces by two thirds, which would give the Kwantung Army a two-to-one superiority. [38] The War Ministry as a whole, however, was not in agreement with the Army hawks. Although it supported the notion of reinforcing the north, it preferred a far more modest limit of only 16 divisions between the Kwantung and Korea Armies in light of priorities elsewhere, a force with which the Kwantung Army considered it to be "impossible" to engage the Soviets. The message was clear that the Japanese would wait until the persimmon had ripened and fallen before they acted against the Red Army. [39]


"Special Maneuvers" underway, 1941 Kwantung Army Special Maneuvers1.JPG
"Special Maneuvers" underway, 1941

Stung by their initial setback at the hands of the War Ministry, the IJA hardliners would get their revenge, at least in principle. During a personal visit on 5 July 1941, Major General Shin'ichi Tanaka, AGS Operations Chief and co-leader (along with Matsuoka) of the "Strike North" faction in Tokyo, managed to persuade War Minister Hideki Tojo to support Army General Staff's opinions concerning the "rightness" and "viability" of reinforcing Manchuria. General Tanaka and his supporters pushed for a greater commitment than even the Army's June 1941 plan, a total of up to 25 divisions, under the guise of establishing the readiness stance of only 16 divisions preferred by the War Ministry. Tanaka's plan involved two stages, a buildup and readiness phase (No. 100 setup) that would be followed by the offensive stance (No. 101 and 102 setups) during which the Kwantung Army would await the order to attack. The entire process was referred to by the acronym of "Kantokuen," from (Kantogun Tokushu Enshu), or Kwantung Army Special Maneuvers. With Tojo's support for Kantokuen secured, the hardliners completed their circumvention of the War Ministry on July 7, when General Hajime Sugiyama visited the Imperial Palace to request Hirohito's official sanction for the build up. After assurances from the general that the Kwantung Army would not attack on its own initiative after reinforcements had been received, the Emperor relented. [40]

Planned Japanese penetrations on the Ussuri Front, with dates of addition in response to Soviet fortification Ussuri Breakthrough Zones.png
Planned Japanese penetrations on the Ussuri Front, with dates of addition in response to Soviet fortification

Operationally speaking, Kantokuen was essentially identical to the War Plan of 1940 [41] but with an abbreviated force structure (20–30 as opposed to 43 divisions) that presumably banked on the Soviet inability to reinforce the Far East in light of the conflict against Germany. The level of commitment, however, was still enormous and by far the single greatest mobilization in the history of the Japanese Army. [42] To facilitate the operation, a tremendous number of both combat and logistical assets would have to be dispatched to Manchuria on top of the existing structure. In particular, to capitalize on the Japanese advantage of interior lines, the railways in the north and the east had to be expanded to accommodate the increased burden carried by an offensive war. [43] Additionally, port facilities, military housing, and hospitals were also to be augmented. [44] Like the previous concepts drawn up in the aftermath of the Nomonhan Incident, Kantokuen would begin with a massive initial blow on the Ussuri Front against Primorye that would be followed up with another attack to the North against Blagoveshchensk and Kuibyshevka. [45] Under the umbrella organization of the First Area Army, the Japanese Third and Twentieth Armies, supported by the 19th Division of the Korea Army, would penetrate the border south of Lake Khanka to overcome the main Soviet defensive lines and threaten Vladivostok. Simultaneously, the Fifth Army would strike just south of Iman (now Dalnerechensk) to complete the isolation of the Maritime Province, sever the Trans-Siberian Railway, and block any reinforcements arriving from the north. In northern Manchuria, the Fourth Army would at first hold the Amur River line before it transitioned to the offensive against Blagoveshchensk. [46] [47] Meanwhile, two reinforced divisions of Japanese troops outside the Kantokuen force structure would start operations against Northern Sakhalin from both the landward and the seaward sides with the aim of wiping out the defenders there in a pincer movement. [48] Other second-stage objectives included the capture of Khabarovsk, Komsomolsk, Skovorodino, Sovetskaya Gavan, and Nikolayevsk. Additionally, amphibious operations against Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky and other parts of the Kamchatka Peninsula were contemplated. [49] [50]

The allocation of forces was never firmly agreed upon and underwent several revisions during the planning stage (see table below). Two variants drawn up on 8 July 1941 were in close agreement with regard to the forces to be deployed on the Eastern (Ussuri) Front (13 to 14 divisions), but the strength allocated to the Fourth Army varied from 1 tp 5 divisions because there was no consensus over whether the offensive against Blagoveshchensk should be launched simultaneously with that against Primorye. The Kwantung Army was concerned about the prospect of simultaneous offensives on both the Amur and Ussuri Fronts and on on 9 July suggested a direct attack on Khabarovsk as an alternative to Blagoveshchensk. The Army General Staff rejected the idea since no developed plans then existed for such an operation. Instead, on 11 July, General Tanaka proposed raising the total forces in Manchuria to 30 divisions, but nothing came of that. On 29 July, the Kwantung Army decided to abandon the idea of simultaneous attacks in the north and east for an all-out offensive on the Ussuri Front with defensive operations elsewhere. Only after the first stage would additional forces be reallocated to the Amur. Meetings between Prime Minister Hideki Tojo and General Tanaka on 31 July confirmed the "sequential" approach. The total forces would be limited to only 24 divisions, but at least 17 of them.would be committed to the Eastern Front, and the entire Kwantung Army reserve (another 5 divisions) was to be concentrated at Mutanchiang, very near the eastern border. [51]

To ensure the success of the first phase of the invasion, enormous forces would be gathered. By 16 September, it was decided that "for operational preparations lasting three months and involving 23 or 24 divisions on the offensive (including the Korea Army)," the logistical basis would be 1,200,000 men, 35,000 motor vehicles, 500 tanks, [lower-alpha 4] 400,000 horses, and 300,000 laborers. [53] That would have meant, however, that the Western Front facing the Mongolian People's Republic and the Trans-Baikal region could be defended by only one division, the 23rd, as well as the equivalent in miscellaneous forces of a few more. [lower-alpha 5] Indeed, during the initial phase of operations, the Japanese Sixth Army was allocated only the 23rd Division and the 8th Border Guards Unit, veterans of the fighting at Khalkhin Gol two years earlier. [55] To minimize the danger from a Soviet counteroffensive in the west while the bulk of the Japanese Army was engaged in the east, the IJA hoped that delaying actions and the vast expanses of the Gobi Desert [56] and Hailar Plain [57] would serve as "strategic buffers" to prevent the Red Army from mounting a serious challenge to the heart of Manchuria before the main body had regrouped for a pivot westward. The final objective of the Japanese troops was a line running through Skovorodino and the western slopes of the Great Khingan Mountains, along which they would defeat the remaining Soviet forces and transition to a defensive stance. [58]

Air power played a crucial role in the plan. Before the outbreak of the Pacific War, the Japanese intended to dispatch some 1,200 to 1,800 planes in 3 air divisions to bolster the existing 600 to 900 that were already in Manchuria, [59] which would co-operate with about 350 Navy craft to launch a "sudden," "annihilating" attack on the Soviet Far East Air Force at the outset of hostilities. If they had succeeded, the Japanese air forces would then have focused their efforts toward supporting the ground troops on the tactical level, cutting Soviet lines of communication and supply (particularly in the Amur and Trans-Baikal regions), and blocking air reinforcements from arriving from Europe. [60]

Kantokuen variants by date with hypothetical order of battle [61]
8 July 1941Kwantung Army ReserveWestern FrontNorthern FrontEastern FrontSummaryEmphasis
Arshaan Direction Hailar Direction Amur DirectionFront Reserve Sanjiang Direction Lake Khanka (north)Lake Khanka (west) Suifenhe Direction Dongning Direction Hunchun Direction
21st, 53rd, 52nd, 54th Divs6th Army (23rd Division, 3 Independent Garrison Units)4th Army (1st Division)None3rd Cavalry Brigade, 3 Independent Garrison Units5th Army (10th, 11th, 24th, 28th, 51st Divs)20th Army (14th, 25th Divs)3rd Army (8th, 9th, 12th, 20th, 29th, 57th Divs)19th Div, Hunchun GarrisonTotalOffensive on the Eastern Front
4 Divisions1 Division1 Division14 Divisions20 Divisions
4th, 6th, 16th, 41st, 56th Divs6th Army (23rd Division, 3 Independent Garrison Units)4th Army (1st, 21st, 33rd, 51st, 52nd, 54th Divs)None3rd Cavalry Brigade, 3 Independent Garrison Units5th Army (10th, 11th, 24th, 28th Divs)20th Army (14th, 25th Divs)3rd Army (8th, 9th, 12th, 20th, 29th, 57th Divs)19th Div, Hunchun GarrisonTotalSimultaneous Offensives on Northern and Eastern Fronts
5 Divsions1 Division5 Divisions13 Divisions25 Divisions
29 July 19414th, 6th, 16th, 41st, 56th Divs6th Army (23rd, 54th Divs)4th Army (1st, 52nd Divs)21st, 33rd Divs5th Army (10th, 11th, 24th, 28th, 51st, Divs, 3rd Cavalry Brigade)20th Army (8th, 14th, 25th, 29th Divs)3rd Army (9th, 12th, 19th, 20th, 57th Divs)TotalOffensive on the Eastern Front
5 Divisions2 Divisions2 Divisions16 Divisions25 Divisions
HQ: Qiqihar HQ: Bei'an HQ: Dong'an HQ: Jixi HQ: Laoheishan
Commanding Officer Jiro Sogawa Kesago Nakajima Jo Iimura Kameji Seki Masakazu Kawabe
After 31 July 19414th, 41st, 52nd, 54th, 56th Divs (to be concentrated at Mutanchiang)6th Army (23rd Division)4th Army (1st Division)16th, 21st, 22rd Divs5th Army (10th, 11th, 24th, 28th, 51st Divs, 3rd Cavalry Brigade)20th Army (8th, 14th, 25th, 29th Divs)3rd Army (9th, 12th, 19th, 20th, 57th Divs)TotalOffensive on the Eastern Front
5 Divisions1 Division1 Division17 Divisions24 Divisions

Characteristics of the theater

In preparing for any future war in the Far East, Japanese (and Soviet) strategic planning was dominated by two fundamental geopolitical realities: [62] [63]

Far East Railways.png
Manchurian Railways, 1942.png
Reference maps of major railways in the Far East and Manchuria [64]

That observation formed the basis of the vulnerability of Far Eastern Russia (FER) in a war against Japan. According to Japanese intelligence, FER's lack of self-sufficiency was exacerbated by the fact that a high proportion of its small population (about 6 million people in total) [65] was concentrated in urban, rather than rural, environments, [66] which created a deficiency in food production for both soldiers and civilians as well as a smaller pool of potential reservists. [67] Despite the allocation of considerable resources to FER under Joseph Stalin's Second and Third Five Year Plans (1933–1942), serious shortcomings still remained. Although the Soviets traditionally relied on the Trans-Siberian Railway to send manpower, food, and raw materials eastward to overcome the major deficiencies, sometimes even by forcibly resettling discharged soldiers in Siberia. [68] This created another problem, since the limited capacity of that railroad also restricted the maximum size of any Red Army force that could be brought to bear on Japan, which the Japanese estimated to be the equivalent of 55 to 60 divisions. [69]

Estimate of Economic Self-Sufficiency of Far Eastern Russia, 1945 [70]
CommodityRequirementActual productionSelf-sufficiencyWartime reserves
Grain1,390,000 tons930,000 tons (excluding 200k tons for seed supply)67%800,000 tons
Petroleum1,520,000 tons1,000,000 tons66%1,300,000 tons
Steel580,000 tons220,000 tons38%Unknown
Coal13,200,000 tons13,200,000 tons100%Unknown
Estimate of monthly materiel output in Far Eastern Russia, 1945 [71]
Armored cars30

Thus, any prolonged disruption of the Trans-Siberian Railway would ultimately prove fatal to FER and to any Soviet attempt to defend it, something that was well within Japanese capabilities as the tracks ran parallel to the frontier for thousands of kilometers and sometimes even came to within artillery range of the Manchurian border. Furthermore, though the encircling geography of the Soviet Union and Mongolia theoretically gave the Red Army an opportunity for a strategic envelopment of Manchuria, [72] on the defensive the strung out Russian groupings would be vulnerable to isolation and piecemeal destruction. Although the Soviets made concerted efforts to address that vulnerability, such as beginning work on a 4,000 km extension of the Trans-Siberian Railway, the BAM Line, they alone were insufficient to rectify the basic weakness. [73]

The limitations of the Trans-Siberian Railway and the remoteness of FER conferred both advantages and disadvantages to both sides. Although they prevented the Red Army from concentrating its full might against the Japanese and provided the latter with an effective means of isolating the region from European Russia, they also ensured that Japan alone could never administer a decisive defeat to the Soviet Union because the latter's main military and economic assets would remain unharmed. [74] The IJA General Staff concluded that only an offensive on two fronts, in Europe and Asia, that was brought to bear on the Soviets' vital industrial centers and was aimed at collapsing its political will to resist would bringing about their destruction. [75]

Soviet response

The Soviet Union asserted that its military planning against Japan during the 1930s and early 1940s was defensive in nature and was intended primarily to preserve its control over the Russian Far East and communist Mongolia. The means to that end, however, would not be completely passive. Even after the German invasion and well into 1942, Stavka advocated for an all-out defense of the border zone and heavy counterattacks all along the front with the objective of preventing the IJA from seizing any Soviet territory and throwing it back into Manchuria. Although the aggressive language used by Boris Shaposhnikov in 1938 concerning "decisive action" in northern Manchuria after 45 days [76] had by 1941 been moderated to simply "destroying the first echelon" of invaders and "creating a situation of stability," [77] the Red Army never totally gave up limited offensive goals. The Japanese assessed that the lack of traversable terrain between the Manchurian border and the Pacific Ocean combined with the vulnerability of the Trans-Siberian Railway in the Amur and Primorye regions compelled them to take such a stance, despite investing considerable resources to fortify the area for defensive warfare. [78]

The primary Red Army forces stationed in Soviet Far East in 1941 were the Far Eastern and Trans-Baikal Fronts, under the command of Generals Iosif Apanasenko and Mikhail Kovalyov, [79] [lower-alpha 6] respectively. [80] [81] The Trans-Baikal Front, with nine divisions (including two armored), a mechanized brigade, and a fortified region was tasked with defending the area west of the Oldoy River near Skovorodino, and the Far Eastern Front, with 23 divisions (including three armored), four brigades (excluding antiaircraft), and 11 fortified regions was responsible for the area east of it, including the crucial seaport of Vladivostok. The two fronts together accounted for some 650,000 men, 5,400 tanks, 3,000 aircraft, 57,000 motor vehicles, 15,000 artillery pieces, and 95,000 horses. The distribution of manpower and equipment in prewar FER was as follows: [82]

Manpower and Materiel under Administrative Control of TBMD and FEF, 1 June 1941
ResourceFar Eastern FrontTrans-Baikal MDTotal
Personnel431,581219,112650,693 [lower-alpha 7]
Small Arms713,821314,6581,028,389
Incl. Rifles674,178302,654976,832
Incl. SMGs11,5021,76213,264
Incl. LMG/HMGs27,44510,04937,494
Incl. AA MGs696103799
Motor Vehicles28,86528,64457,329
Incl. Trucks20,28820,21340,501
Incl. M1932/37 45mm AT1,7248572,581
Incl. M1927 76mm rgtl. gun359342701
Incl. M1902/30 76mm div. gun290399689
Incl. M1936 76mm div. gun96096
Incl. M1939 76mm div. gun152172324
Incl. M1909 76mm mtn. gun3560356
Incl. M1910/30 107mm gun9580175
Incl. M1931 122mm gun16836204
Incl. M1910/30 122mm howitzer6784081,086
Incl. M1909/30 152mm howitzer600162762
Incl. M1937 152mm htzr/gun239125364
Incl. M1938 152mm howitzer03636
Incl. M1931 203mm howitzer712495
Incl. M1937 82mm mortar1,3106241,934
Incl. M1938 107mm mortar13815153
Incl. M1938 120mm mortar363251614
Incl. M1938/40 50mm mortar2,6511,3984,049
Incl. M1931/38 76mm AA gun547341888
Incl. M1939 AA autocannon324880
Incl. T-27276134410
Incl. T-27 chemical17017
Incl. T-37187263450
Incl. T-37 radio9944143
Incl. T-37 chemical235
Incl. T-38152132284
Incl. T-38 radio31417
Incl. T-269552681,223
Incl. T-26 two turret149156305
Incl. T-26 radio9962111,207
Incl. T-26-13017081251
Incl. T-26 BKhM-3121931
Incl. T-26 engineer909
Incl. T-26 tractor104757
Incl. SU-511011
Incl. BT-221113
Incl. BT-580216296
Incl. BT-5 radio16102118
Incl. BT-7202488690
Incl. BT-7 radio137469606
Incl. BT-7 artillery281947
Incl. BA-2018125143
Incl. BA-20 radio18121139
Incl. FAI122104226
Incl. BA-1010117127
Incl. BA-10 radio28153181
Incl. BA-67447121
Incl. BA-6 radio82331
Incl. BA-3172643
Incl. BAI04949
Incl. BA-274913
Incl. DB-310010
Incl. SB607380987
Incl. TB-3909
Incl. I-153251142393
Incl. I-15346120466
Incl. I-166424081,050
Incl. R-Zet33033
Incl. MBR-2505
Incl. R-535035
Incl. SSS202
Incl. USB102131
Two emplacements similar to these 12-inch (305 mm) guns of the Soviet battleship Parizhskaya Kommuna were erected to protect Vladivostok harbor in 1934. ParizhskayaKommuna-mainguns.jpg
Two emplacements similar to these 12-inch (305 mm) guns of the Soviet battleship Parizhskaya Kommuna were erected to protect Vladivostok harbor in 1934.

By 1942, the Vladivostok Defense Sector also had some 150 artillery pieces of 75 mm to 356 mm caliber, which were organized into 50 batteries. Of these, the most numerous was the 130 mm B-13, which made up 20 batteries (90 guns). [83] [84] After the German invasion, Soviet forces in the Far East underwent a radical transformation. Even before the start of Operation Barbarossa, the Red Army had begun a steady transfer of men and materiel westward to Europe. Prior to 22 June 1941, the above figures had been reduced by 57,000 men, 670 artillery pieces, and 1,070 tanks from five divisions; [85] between 22 June and 1 December, a further 2,209 tanks were sent to the front to stem the Axis tide. [86] Additionally, during the same period, 13 other divisions, [87] [lower-alpha 8] with 122,000 men, 2,000 guns and mortars, 1,500 tractors, and nearly 12,000 automobiles, were also detached from the Far East, along with a Japanese estimate of 1,800 aircraft. [88] On the whole, between June 22, 1941 and May 9, 1945, a total of 344,676 men, 2,286 tanks, 4,757 guns and mortars, 11,903 motor vehicles, and 77,929 horses were removed from the Far Eastern and Trans-Baikal Fronts to bolster the desperate fighting against the Wehrmacht, [89] the vast majority of whom arrived before early 1943. [90]

Soviet 14 inch (356 mm) TM-1-14 railway gun; three were installed at Vladivostok in 1933-1934. TM-1-14 railroad gun.jpg
Soviet 14 inch (356 mm) TM-1-14 railway gun; three were installed at Vladivostok in 1933–1934.

In spite of a marked reduction in materiel power, the Soviets undertook herculean efforts to increase their troop levels in an expansion paralleling the massive Japanese buildup in Manchuria, which was easily tracked by Soviet and Chinese observers because of its sheer size. [91] In accordance with the general mobilization ordered by the GKO on 22 July 1941, the combined strength of the Far Eastern and Trans-Baikal Fronts was to be raised to more than 1 million by 2 August. [92] By 20 December, the actual manpower levels had totaled 1,161,202, of whom 1,129,630 were regular officers or enlisted men and the remainder were cadets or course attendees. Additionally, the number of horses increased from 94,607 to 139,150. [93] The expansion of active personnel was achieved in spite of the Far East's limited population base through the addition of reservists from the Ural, Central Asian, and Siberian Military districts on top of those available locally. [94] Furthermore, the standing strength of the NKVD and the Soviet Navy was also increased; between 22 June and 15 November 1941, Navy manpower in the Far East under Admiral Yumashev rose from 94,199, [lower-alpha 9] to 169,029, [lower-alpha 10] [95] and the NKVD border troops (with a roster of just under 34,000 before the war) [96] would, if the ratio held, have likewise increased their strength to over 60,000. Lastly there were the Mongolians, who despite their lack of heavy weaponry had earlier proved themselves against the Japanese at the Battles of Khalkhin Gol and would later go on to participate in the Soviet invasion of Manchuria in August 1945. They lacked the Soviets' experience and organization but numbered close to 80,000. [97]

On the whole, if war had broken out in late August or early September 1941, the Soviets and Mongolians could have called on well over a million men from Mongolia to Sakhalin to confront the Japanese. About two thirds of those personnel (including virtually the entire navy) would have been on the Amur-Ussuri-Sakhalin Front, and the remainder would have defended Mongolia and the Trans-Baikal region. Equipment was split much more evenly between the two groupings. [98] The Soviets could thus concentrate considerably greater military power east of Lake Baikal than either Japanese or American observers gave them credit for:

Japanese and U.S. Intelligence data on the strength of Soviet Army Forces east of Lake Baikal
Category/SourceJapanese Estimate, December 1940 [99] Soviet Data, 22 June 1941 [100] Japanese Estimate, 24 October 1941 [101] U.S. Estimate, 21 October 1941 [102] Japanese Estimate, December 1941 [103] [lower-alpha 11] Soviet Data, 1 December 1941 [104]
Manpower700,000~650,000 [lower-alpha 12] N/A682,000600,000 to 800,000~1,200,000 [lower-alpha 13]
Tanks2,4003,1881,200 to 1,4001,6001,0003,193
Submarines/Warships [lower-alpha 14] 10394N/AN/A10596
The countryside between Suifenhe and Mutanchiang; on both sides of the border the immediate terrain is hilly, backed by flat plains. Xun Dao Gong Chu Pin Photo by Xundaogong - panoramio (81).jpg
The countryside between Suifenhe and Mutanchiang; on both sides of the border the immediate terrain is hilly, backed by flat plains.

Even though the situation in Europe was dire, Soviet planners continued to adhere to essentially the same prewar concept for operations in FER and Manchuria, as articulated by Stavka Directive No. 170149 and 170150, which were sent to Generals Apanasenko and Kovalyov on 16 March 1942. [105] Under this strategy, during the opening days of hostilities the Far Eastern Front (with its headquarters at Khabarovsk) together with the Pacific Fleet was ordered to conduct an all-out defense of the border; prevent the Japanese from entering Soviet territory; and hold Blagoveshchensk, Iman (Dalnerechensk) and the entirety of Primorye "at all costs." The main defensive effort was to be mounted by the 1st and 25th Armies (the former based at Vladivostok) on a north-south axis between the Pacific Ocean and Lake Khanka, while the 35th Army would dig in at Iman. To the north, the 15th and 2nd Red Banner Armies, based at Birobidzhan and Blagoveshchensk, would attempt to repel all Japanese assaults from the far bank of the powerful Amur River. Meanwhile, the Soviets would try to hold out on Sakhalin, Kamchatka, and the Pacific Coast, seeking to deny the Sea of Okhotsk to the IJN. To help aid that effort, the Red Army had for years undertaken a determined fortification program along the borders with Manchuria that involved the construction of hundreds of hardened fighting positions backed by trenches, referred to as "Tochkas" (points). [106] There were three types of Tochkas, DOTs (permanent fire points), SOTs (disappearing fire points), and LOTs (dummy fire points). The most common form of DOT built by the Soviets in the Far East was hexagonal in shape, with an interior diameter of 5–6 m (16–20 ft) for the smaller bunkers and up to 10 m (33 ft) for larger ones. They protruded approximately 2 m (6.6 ft) above ground level, with the outer wall facing the front made of solid concrete 1 m (3.3 ft) or more thick. The backbone of the Soviet defenses, DOTs usually contained two or three machine guns; some were equipped with one or two 76 mm guns. The Soviets arranged their DOTs into belts: depending on the terrain, the strongpoints were spaced out over 400–600 m (440–660 yd) intervals and positioned in two to four rows 300–1,000 m (330–1,090 yd) deep from one another. According to Japanese intelligence, by late 1941 the Tochkas were distributed among 12 fortified regions as follows: [107] [lower-alpha 15]

Fortified regions in the Amur, Ussuri, and Trans-Baikal sectors

Map of Soviet fortified areas in the Far East and Ussuri region in particular, 1945
UR NameHQ locationFrontage (km)Depth (km)Number of DOTs
No. 113Chertovaya352–7125
No. 108Kraskino462–8105
No. 110Slavyanka451–730
No. 107BarabashUnknownUnknownUnknown
No. 111(No nearby town)361–855
No. 106Konstantinovka352–8155
No. 105Grodekovo502–12255
No. 109Iman351–10100
No. 102Leninskoe751–870
No. 101Blagoveshchensk1101–7326
BorzyaBorzyaunknownunknownapprox. 1/sq. mile
A Tochka (DOT), typical of those found in Soviet fortified regions during World War II Kingiseppskii ukreplennyi raion, DOT No. 26..jpg
A Tochka (DOT), typical of those found in Soviet fortified regions during World War II

The Fortified Regions were well sited; since there were a limited number of roads crossing the hilly, forested frontier, the Soviets could be confident that each avenue of approach was covered by prepared defenses, which would have to be overcome via costly frontal attack and thus delay the enemy forces and make them pay heavily in manpower and equipment. [108] To counter the Tochkas, the Japanese kept considerable quantities of heavy artillery near the border, ranging from more modern 240 mm and 305 mm howitzers to the antiquated 28 cm Howitzer L/10 from the Russo-Japanese War. As an added precaution, the IJA distributed a special one-ton shell with a range of only 1,000 m to its Type 7 30 cm Howitzers [lower-alpha 16] meant to pulverize an enemy strongpoint in a single hit. [110] Despite the advantages conferred by the border terrain and Tochka belt, the Red Army did not intend on solely hunkering down and outlasting a Japanese assault. By the fifth day of war, Stavka ordered the troops of the 15th and 35th Armies (minus the 66th Rifle Division), together with the Amur Red Banner Military Flotilla and any available reserves, to defeat the Japanese-Manchu units opposite them, force the Amur and Ussuri, and launch a counteroffensive coordinated against both sides of the Sungari River in Manchurian territory. The final objectives of the Sungari Front groups were designated as the cities of Fujin and Baoqing, which were to be reached on the 25th day of hostilities. The objectives of that attack were to stabilize the front and to relieve pressure on the Ussuri Railway and Khabarovsk areas. [111] Similarly, all along the front the remaining Soviet forces would begin short counterblows "in the tactical depth," [112] in keeping with the Soviet doctrine that defensive action cannot be successful without the coordination of position defense and counterattack. [113] Simultaneously, on the opposite side of Manchuria, the 17th and 36th Armies of the Trans-Baikal Front (with its headquarters at Mount Shirlova in the Yablonovy Range) were ordered to hold and counterattack after a period of three days and to advance to Lakes Buir and Hulun by the tenth day of the war. [114] Undoubtedly, as a consequence of the Soviets' desperate situation at the time reinforcements from the hinterland were relatively small. Only four tank brigades, five artillery regiments, six guards mortar regiments, and five armored train divisions were allocated to both fronts put together. [115]

Outline of the Soviet operational plan in the event of war, early 1942 KantokuenSovWikiMap.png
Outline of the Soviet operational plan in the event of war, early 1942

With the aim of supporting the Red Army's struggle on the ground, the Soviet Air Force and Navy were also to have an active role in opposing the Japanese invasion. The foremost objective of the air force was the destruction of Japanese aircraft both in the air and on the ground, which was to be followed by tactical ground-attack missions against Japanese troops to assist the progress of the Sungari Offensive. Other objectives included the destruction of railways, bridges, and airfields in both Manchuria and Korea and the interception of both troop transports and warships in the Sea of Japan in coordination with the Pacific Fleet. Strategic bombing was to be limited to only 30 DB-3s, to be sent in groups of 8 to 10 aircraft against targets in Tokyo, Yokosuka, Maizuru, and Ominato. Concurrently, the Soviet Navy would immediately strive to close the mouth of the Amur, mine the Tatar Strait, and defend the Pacific Coast from any potential landing, which would free up the 25th Army in Primorye from coast defense duty. Submarine patrols would begin in the Yellow Sea, Sea of Okhotsk, and Sea of Japan with the aim of preventing the transport of troops from the Japanese Home Islands to the Asian Mainland and to disrupt their maritime communications. The Soviet submariners were ordered not to press operations against the eastern (Pacific) coast of Japan but to protect the eastern and northern shores of Sakhalin Island and Baykal Bay. [116]

Combatants' strengths and weaknesses

30 cm Type 7 short (foreground) and long-barreled howitzers, 21 of which were deployed near the border in 1941. Type 7 30-cm-howitzer short.jpg
30 cm Type 7 short (foreground) and long-barreled howitzers, 21 of which were deployed near the border in 1941.
The ML-20 152 mm heavy howitzer-gun was capable of outranging most Japanese pieces and fired a shell weighing 43.6 kg. 152mm ml20 hameenlinna 6.jpg
The ML-20 152 mm heavy howitzer-gun was capable of outranging most Japanese pieces and fired a shell weighing 43.6 kg.

Weaknesses in military industry would not have permitted the Japanese to fight an all-out modern land war for years on end. According to a study prepared just before the outbreak of the Pacific War, it was estimated that Japan's capacity to produce Army ground ordnance would reach a peak of 50 kaisenbun during the 1942 fiscal year, or enough to sustain 50 divisions for four months. [117] In reality, annual production never surpassed 25 kaisenbun, with only 19 being produced in 1941 on top of an Army reserve of 100; total expenditures during that year amounted to 11 kaisenbun. [118] For operations against the Soviet Union, General Tanaka believed that a supply basis of 3 kaisenbun per division was necessary and so a total of 48 kaisenbun were assigned to the 16 divisions of the Kwantung and Korea Armies during the Kantokuen buildup. [119] If the buildup proceeded to the 24-division level, that would have effectively meant the Japanese were gambling two thirds of their ammunition stockpile on the initial blow of an open-ended war that they admitted could not be ended by force of arms alone. In comparison, although the Trans-Siberian Railway imposed a limit on the size of the force that the Soviets could bring to battle at any one time, their military industry as a whole, supported by Western aid, was able to sustain a grinding four-year war against Germany to a victorious close. By contrast, without a "second front" diverting the majority of Soviet resources to Europe, Japan would have been hard-pressed to supply its forces for more than two consecutive years.

In addition, although their then four-year war in China had provided the Japanese with a large amount of combat experience, much of it translated only obliquely to a campaign against the Soviets, who had a firmer understanding of concepts such as massed firepower and motor-based logistics. During the Nomonhan Incident, the IJA regarded distances of 100 km as "far" and 200 trucks as "many," but Zhukov's corps of over 4,000 vehicles supplied his Army Group on a 1,400 km round trip from the nearest railheads. [120] Although both Japanese and Soviet infantry at Nomonhan were equipped with bolt-action rifles, mortars, and light automatic weapons, Japanese artillery often found itself outranged and undersupplied against the heavy Soviet guns. [121] Even though Japanese counterfire managed to silence a number of Soviet batteries, [122] the lack of range and shortage of ammunition left it at a distinct disadvantage against the Red Army. [123]

To make up for its inferiority in numbers and limited material resources, the IJA relied on intangible factors such as fighting spirit and élan to overcome the foe, with mixed results. [124] Although the Kwantung Army's state of supply improved substantially between 1939 and 1941, [125] Japan's fundamental reliance on spirit to bring victory in battle never changed, [126] sometimes at the expense of logical thinking and common sense. [127] Often, fanatical adherence to tradition so impeded revisions to both doctrine and technology that those who spoke about the matter were accused of "faintheartedness" and "insulting the Imperial Army." [128] Toward the end of the Pacific War, the pendulum began to swing in the opposite direction, with Japanese leaders grasping at wonder weapons such as jet fighters and a so-called "death ray" in the hope of reversing their fortunes. [129]

Despite glaring Japanese weaknesses in the long run, the short-term situation was far less reassuring for the Soviets, who were hard-pressed by Germany's devastating advance in Europe. Although the Far Eastern and Trans-Baikal Fronts had a formidable array of weaponry, the desperate fighting in the west meant that strength was siphoned away by the week. The state of the remaining equipment was often mixed: prior to the 1941 transfers, some 660 tanks [130] and 347 aircraft [131] were inoperable because of repair needs or other causes. Because the Soviets had only a limited offensive capability on the Primorye and Trans-Baikal directions, they were unlikely to have achieved a decisive victory during the initial stage of the fighting even if they succeeded in slowing or stopping the Japanese. [132] Furthermore, attacking into the teeth of a prepared enemy, especially one with his own fortified regions and heavy concentrations of troops immediately opposite the border, was "the hardest kind of offensive," which required "overwhelming numbers and massive means of assault" to succeed, [133] neither of which the Red Army had at the time. [134]

Chi-Has and Ha-Gos of the Chiba Tank School during exercises (1940) Type 95 tanks and type 97 tanks of the Chiba Tank School during exercises (1940).jpg
Chi-Has and Ha-Gos of the Chiba Tank School during exercises (1940)

The Soviets' position was further aggravated by the dispersal of their forces across a vast arc from Mongolia to Vladivostok. Without the ability to capitalize on that deployment by striking deep into Manchuria from multiple axes, their strength would be diluted and prone to piecemeal destruction at the hands of the Japanese, who could shift their forces from one front to another along interior lines. [135] [lower-alpha 17] On the other hand, the remoteness of the theater from European Russia meant that the Soviets were not in danger of sustaining a mortal blow unless there was either a political collapse or a German breakthrough on the main front. [138]

Despite those difficulties the Red Army maintained its superiority in armored vehicles. Although the most modern tank available to the Kwantung Army in 1941, the Type 97 Chi-Ha, had thicker armor (up to 33 mm) [139] than the Soviet BT and T-26, its low-velocity 57 mm gun was outmatched by the long-barreled 45 mm weapons mounted on the latter, and the Ha-Go and Te-Ke's 37 mm cannons had an effective range of less than 1 km. [140] In general, the "handcrafted, beautifully polished" Japanese tanks were more survivable thanks to their diesel engines (the gasoline powerplants used by the Russians were especially fireprone [141] ), but their smaller numbers meant that each loss was more damaging to the IJA than each destroyed "crudely finished" "expendable" BT or T-26 was to the Red Army. [142]

The IJN's Mitsubishi A6M "Zero" fighter was superior to anything in the Soviet inventory. Mitsubishi A6M Zero , Ling Shi Jian Shang Zhan Dou Ji Liu Er Xing  - panoramio (2).jpg
The IJN's Mitsubishi A6M "Zero" fighter was superior to anything in the Soviet inventory.

The situation in the air was reversed: even though the Polikarpov I-16, the best Soviet fighter plane in the theater, performed adequately against the Nakajima Ki-27 at Khalkhin Gol [143] [lower-alpha 18] most other Red aircraft were considerably older. Furthermore, the Soviets had no answer to either the Mitsubishi A6M, which had been operating in China since 1940, [144] or the high-speed Ki-21 bomber, which could fly faster and farther than its counterpart, the SB-2. [145] [146] Japanese pilots were also highly experienced, with IJNAS airmen averaging roughly 700 hours of flight time by late 1941 while IJAAF pilots averaged 500. Many of these fliers had already tasted combat against China or the VVS in previous battles. [147] In comparison, German pilots received only about 230 hours of flying time and Soviet pilots even less. [148]

Lastly, the quality of personnel in the respective armies cannot be ignored. As the Soviets drained their best and most well-trained divisions to fight in the west, their combat effectiveness in the east correspondingly diminished, which forced the Stavka to place increased emphasis on the fortified regions for defensive operations. [149] Meanwhile, the opposing Kwantung Army was "the cream of the entire Japanese armed forces" [150] and was receiving reinforcements by the day. Many its units were elite Type A divisions, [lower-alpha 19] many of which had experience in China. Several officers who would go on to have notable careers in the Pacific War, including Tomoyuki Yamashita (head of the Kwantung Defense Command and later First Area Army), Isamu Yokoyama (1st Division, later 4th Army), Mitsuru Ushijima (11th Division), [152] and Tadamichi Kuribayashi (1st Cavalry Brigade, Mongolia Garrison Army) [153] held commands there.


Fading support

US President Franklin Roosevelt enacted a crippling series of sanctions on Japan that undermined its capacity for aggression. FDRfiresidechat2.jpg
US President Franklin Roosevelt enacted a crippling series of sanctions on Japan that undermined its capacity for aggression.

The IJA designs against the Soviet Union did not exist in a vacuum. Even as the buildup for Kantokuen was underway, the war against China and the diplomatic standoff with the United States and its allies continued to drag on, which put Japanese strategic planners in a difficult position. By mid-July 1941, Foreign Minister Matsuoka's continued insistence for an immediate war against the Soviet Union ended in his dismissal and his replacement with Admiral Teijiro Tono, which dealt a blow to the "Strike North" faction. [154] Further damaging the anti-Soviet cause was that although General Hideki Tojo and Emperor Hirohito both supported the reinforcement of Manchuria, as called for by the AGS, neither was ready to commit to hostilities. Hirohito, in particular, continued to express worry over the volatility of the Kwantung Army and the negative image that the "special maneuvers" created abroad. His concerns were not unfounded since as late as October 1941, Brigadier General Sherman Miles of the US Military Intelligence Division, apprehensive over the rapid increase of Japanese strength in Manchuria, recommended that the US to provide direct military aid to the Soviet and Chinese Armies in an effort to check Axis expansion and to keep the Soviet Union in the war against Germany. [155] The Japanese also increasingly faced a time crunch since the longer the decision to invade was postponed, the less time would be available before winter brought operations to a halt; later versions of Kantokuen were phrased in terms of overrunning Primorye "in 21 days," [156] as opposed to the 6 to 8 weeks that had originally been envisioned or even the 35 days in the AGS "crash schedule." For their part, although Soviet transfers of equipment from east to west had been considerable, manpower levels remained high, nothing like the 50 percent reductions for which IJA planners had optimistically hoped. [157] Nevertheless, despite the objections of General Shunroku Hata, who opposed the weakening of his China Expeditionary Army for the sake of Manchuria and of the incoming Korea Army commander Seishiro Itagaki, Chief of Staff Hajime Sugiyama still persuaded Hirohito to reaffirm his support for the buildup during an audience on 1 August. [158] Events, however, had already begun to overtake them. In response to the Japanese occupation of key points in southern French Indochina on 24 July, US President Franklin Roosevelt, citing an "unlimited national emergency," issued an executive order freezing all of Japan's US assets and controlling all trade and monetary transactions involving Japanese interests. When Britain and the Dutch government-in-exile followed America's example, all trade was effectively blocked between Japan and those three nations. [159]

Even more calamitous was that on on 1 August, the same day Sugiyama appeared before the Emperor, the United States further sanctioned Japan by enacting a total oil embargo. Since American exports accounted for 80% of Japan's oil supply and most of the rest came from the Dutch East Indies, which also refused to sell, the Japanese war machine was virtually cut off. [160] [lower-alpha 20] The oil embargo proved to be the final nail in the coffin for Kantokuen. Scarcely a week later, on 9 August 1941, the Army General Staff finally bowed to the War Ministry as plans for the seizure of the resource rich countries of Southeast Asia were given top priority. [162] Grounded in "sheer opportunism," the IJA's cherished adventure in Siberia could never compete with the grim realities of national survival. In accordance with the agreement, the Kantokuen buildup was to be halted at only 16 divisions, which were to "stand guard" against any provocation, facilitate diplomacy with Stalin's government, or take advantage of a sudden collapse if the opportunity presented itself. [163] All in all, reinforcements to Manchuria totaled 463,000 men, 210,000 horses, and 23,000 vehicles, which brought totals there to 763,000, 253,000, and 29,000, respectively. At the same time, the Korea Army was expanded by a further 55,000 men, 16,000 horses, and 650 vehicles. [164] Throughout Northeast Asia, the total number of IJA personnel stationed in territories on the periphery of Soviet Russia numbered more than 1 million. [165]

"Go South" triumphant

With Kantokuen terminated halfway and Japan plunging toward self-destruction in the Pacific, the Kwantung Army found itself in the midst of a 180-degree turn in national policy. As a harbinger of things to come, the 51st Division was actually withdrawn in September to join the 23rd Army in China, which left a total of 710,000 men remaining in Manchuria. [166] In the face of this, Kwantung Army still clung to the hope of a "golden opportunity" for an attack on the Soviet Union and continued operational preparations while examining the possibility of an offensive northward before the spring thaw of 1942. [167] Although the logistical difficulties of such a move were quickly comprehended, hardliners in the Operations Division refused to hear it. When a logistics colonel complained to the Army General Staff that the Kwantung Army lacked the proper billeting to endure the bitter winter cold near the Siberian frontiers, General Tanaka became infuriated, yelled at the colonel not to say such "nonsensical things," and slapped him. In the aftermath of that episode, common sense prevailed, and the Kwantung Army withdrew from the borders to wait out the winter. Additionally, a further 88,000 men were transferred out of Manchuria to join the impending campaign to the South, which again decreased theater strength to 620,000 men. [168]

Japanese expansion in Asia and the Pacific, 1937-1942 Second world war asia 1937-1942 map en6.png
Japanese expansion in Asia and the Pacific, 1937–1942

When Japan finally struck the Allies and launched its multistage invasion of Southeast Asia in December 1941, the weakened Kwantung Army played only a limited role. Even though most of the units dispatched south were considered to be only "temporary loans," the timing of their return would hinge on the outcome of operations there. [169] In the meantime, Kwantung Army was ordered to ensure the security of Manchuria and to avoid conflict with the Soviet Union, [170] which was itself hard-pressed as German troops neared Moscow.

After the initial phase of the Southern Offensive was brought to a close in the spring of 1942, IGHQ, conscious of the Kwantung Army's weakened state and hoping to make the most of an increased war budget, decided to reorganize and strengthen its troops in Manchuria. [171] The rejuvenation of combat power in the north, while bringing the Kwantung Army closer to its goal from an organizational standpoint, still did not reflect an intention to go to war against the Soviets. Indeed, logistics specialists were convinced that a full year would be needed to repair the damages of the earlier redeployments and to raise capabilities to the level where a serious offensive could be undertaken. [172] Nevertheless, it was then that Kwantung Army reached the absolute peak of its power. Soviet intelligence credited the Japanese with a maximum of 1,100,000 men and 1,500 aircraft [173] in 16 divisions, two brigades, and 23 garrison units; Korea Army added another 120,000 personnel to that figure. Though the Kwantung Army briefly benefited from the momentary "pivot" to the north, the changing tide of the War in the Pacific would soon permanently force Japan's attention back southward. Over the next three years, Kwantung Army would go on to oversee an "exodus" of combat units from Manchuria and set in motion a terminal decline that would eventually lead to its doom. [174]

The end of Kwantung Army

With the Allied counteroffensive in the Pacific both larger and earlier than expected, the Japanese found that their forces there were insufficient to contain its momentum. The lack of a real strategic reserve in the Home Islands forced the IJA to divert troops from the Asian mainland to bolster the Empire's crumbling frontiers. [175] After the 20th, 41st, 52nd, 51st, 32nd, 35th, and 43rd [lower-alpha 21] divisions were withdrawn from China and Korea, Japan could count only on the Kwantung Army, the last major grouping not actively involved in combat operations, as a pool of ready manpower. Although minor redeployments from Manchuria had started as early as 1943, [176] the first wholesale movement of divisions began in February 1944 with the transfer of the 14th and 29th Divisions to Guam and Palau, where they would later be annihilated in battle. [177]

Japanese soldiers on the "Tokyo Express" in the Solomons, 1942 TokyoExpress.jpg
Japanese soldiers on the "Tokyo Express" in the Solomons, 1942

When the US, having bypassed the fortress atoll of Truk, decided to strike directly against the Marianas and decisively defeated the IJN's counterattack in the Battle of the Philippine Sea, the inner perimeter of the Japanese Empire became threatened. Having done little to strengthen its reserves, IGHQ in June and July 1944 sent seven divisions, the 1st, 8th, 10th, 24th, 9th, 28th, and 2nd Armored, into the fray, joined by an eighth, the 23rd (veterans of the Khalkhin Gol fighting in 1939), in October. Of the above, all except the 9th, bypassed on Formosa, and the 28th, on Miyako Jima, avoided being devastated by battle, starvation, and disease during the brutal combat in the Philippines and Okinawa. The decision to reinforce Formosa was of particular consequence for Japan. Recognizing that island's strategic importance with regard to the flow of vital raw materials to the mainland, Tokyo resolved to prevent it from falling into Allied hands at all costs. Thus, in December 1944 and January 1945, the 12th and 71st Divisions were ordered there from Manchuria to reinforce the two-division garrison that had recently been augmented by the Kwantung 9th Division that arrived via Okinawa. The loss of the 9th Division was seen as nothing less than a body blow for Okinawa's 32nd Army commander, Lieutenant General Mitsuru Ushijima, who warned: "If the 9th Division is detached and transferred, I cannot fulfil my duty of defending this island." In the end, because of the American island-hopping strategy, none of the five divisions (including three from the Kwantung Army) ever fired a shot against an American invasion and were left to wither on the vine. [178]

Even before the loss of the 71st Division in January 1945, Kwantung Army had found itself reduced to a paltry 460,000 men in just nine remaining divisions. Not a single division was left to defend Korea, and there were only 120 operable aircraft in all of Manchuria. [179] Worse still, the divisions that stayed behind were effectively ruined by transfers of men and equipment: some infantry companies were left with only one or two officers, and entire artillery regiments completely lacked guns. Although the Kwantung Army held few illusions about its miserable state of affairs (its own "exhaustive studies" concluded that it had been weakened "far beyond estimation" and that new divisions formed to counterbalance the withdrawals possessed only a "fraction" of the fighting power of the originals), senior leaders continued to rationalize. In an audience with Hirohito on February 26, Hideki Tojo attempted to placate the Emperor by noting that the Soviets had done exactly the same thing, and he asserted that the strength of the Soviet Far East forces and the Kwantung Army was "in balance." [180] The next month, with the American juggernaut at last nearing the Home Islands and with none of the multitude of new formations hastily raised in their defense to be fully prepared until summer, the Kwantung Army was called on yet again as the 11th, 25th, 57th, and 1st Armored Divisions were recalled to Japan; the 111th, 120th, and 121st Divisions were sent to South Korea to pre-empt a possible Allied incursion. [181] This "hemorrhage" of equipment and manpower from what was once the most prestigious force in the Japanese Army stopped only on 5 April 1945, when the Soviet Union announced that it would not renew its Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact. [182]

Depth of Soviet penetration into Manchuria as of 15 August 1945 (Credit: JM-154, 1954.) ManchuriaFrontlineAugust15.png
Depth of Soviet penetration into Manchuria as of 15 August 1945 (Credit: JM-154, 1954.)

As the Kwantung Army's fighting power diminished, it had to amend its operational plans against the Soviets accordingly. While the strategy for 1942 was the same as it had been in 1941, [183] that had been abandoned by 1943 favor of only one attack on the Eastern Front against Primorye or in the north against Blagoveshchensk, which itself soon gave way to a holding action on all fronts to attempt to check the Red Army, which was now expected to take the offensive, at the borders. [184] As the Kwantung Army continued to weaken, it became apparent that even that would be too much and so a final operational plan was adopted on 30 May 1945 for the IJA to only delay the Soviet advance in the border zones and to make a fighting retreat to fortifications near the Korean border, centered on the city of Tonghua. That move in effect surrendered the majority of Manchuria to the opponent as a matter of course. [185] [186] Although by August 1945, Kwantung Army manpower had been boosted to 714,000 [187] in 24 divisions and 12 brigades by the exhaustion of local reserves, cannibalization of guards units, and transfers from China, its officers and men were privately in despair. [188] Most of the new formations, staffed by the old, the infirm, civil servants, colonists, and students, [189] were at barely 15% combat-effectiveness [190] and heavily lacking in weapons; out of 230 serviceable combat planes, only 55 could be considered modern. It was even briefly recommended for Army Headquarters to be pre-emptively evacuated from Changchun, but that was rejected on security, political, and psychological grounds. [191] After the war, colonel Saburo Hayashi admitted, "We wanted to provide a show of force. If the Russians only knew the weakness of our preparations in Manchuria, they were bound to attack us." [192]

Simultaneously, Japanese intelligence watched helplessly as Soviet strength opposite them began to soar. Honoring his promise at Yalta to enter the war in the Pacific within three months of Germany's defeat, Joseph Stalin ordered the transfer from Europe to the Far East of some 403,355 crack troops, along with 2,119 tanks and assault guns, 7,137 guns and mortars, 17,374 trucks, and 36,280 horses. [193] These men and their commanders were specially picked because of their past experience in dealing with certain types of terrain and opposition during the war against Germany that would be beneficial for the approaching campaign. [194] By early August, the IJA pegged Red Army forces in Siberia at 1,600,000, with 4,500 tanks and 6,500 aircraft in 47 division-equivalents; [195] the actual totals were 1,577,725, 3,704, and 3,446, respectively. [196] [lower-alpha 22] The Soviets were very deliberate in their preparations: to prevent the Japanese from shifting forces to block an attack on a single front, it was determined that only an all-axes surprise offensive would be sufficient to surround the Kwantung Army before it had a chance to withdraw into the depths of China or Korea. [198] Aware that the Japanese knew the limited capacity of the Trans-Siberian Railway would mean that preparations for an invasion would not be ready until autumn and that weather conditions would also be rather unfavorable before then, Soviet planners enlisted the help of the Allies to deliver additional supplies to facilitate an earlier offensive. Therefore, the Japanese were caught unprepared when hostilities began in August. [199] Despite the impending catastrophe facing Japan on all fronts, the Kwantung Army commander, General Yamada, and his top leadership, continued to live "in a fool's paradise." [200] Even after the atomic bombing of Hiroshima on 6 August, there was no sense of crisis, and special war games (expected to last for five days and attended by a number of high-ranking officers) were conducted near the borders, with Yamada flying to Dairen to dedicate a shrine. Therefore, Army Headquarters was taken by complete surprise when the Soviets launched their general offensive at midnight on August 8/9 1945. [201] The Japanese offered vicious resistance when they were allowed to stand and fight, such as at Mutanchiang, but almost without exception they were overwhelmed and pushed back from the front. After just about a week of combat, reacting to the Soviet declaration of war and the second nuclear strike on Nagasaki, Hirohito overrode his military and ordered the surrender of Japan to the Allies in accordance with the Potsdam Declaration. After some clarifications and a second rescript reaffirming Japan's surrender, General Yamada and his staff abandoned the plan to withdraw to Tonghua even though his command was still mostly intact. The Kwantung Army officially laid down its arms on 17 August 1945 with some sporadic clashes persisting until the end of the month; [202] [lower-alpha 23] the final casualties on both sides numbered 12,031 killed and 24,425 wounded for the Soviets [205] and 21,389 killed and about 20,000 wounded for the Japanese. [206] [lower-alpha 24] In the end, as Foreign Minister Shigemitsu signed the unconditional surrender of Japan aboard USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay, the men of the vaunted Kantogun, having once dreamed of riding into Siberia as conquerors, instead found themselves trudging there as prisoners of war.

See also


  1. The Japanese recruited White Russian agents and the Soviets sent material support to China both before and during the war with Japan.
  2. Japanese planners expected that only 1,000 trucks could be made available and that the supply burden would be borne by horses and coolies (laborers).
  3. For comparison, Operation Barbarossa was launched over a front of 2,900 km (1,800 mi) with the deepest penetrations being about 1,000 km (620 mi) (Defense of Brest Fortress and Battle of Moscow).
  4. Japan then had no formal tank divisions, but the 1st and 2nd Tank Groups, which functioned similarly to divisions, were attached to the Third and Fifth Armies, respectively. According to General Tanaka, there were about 900 tanks in the entire Kwantung Army in the summer of 1943. The composition of its tank forces was then little different from two years earlier. [52]
  5. According to Coox and JSOM, Vol. I, there were no additional border guards units explicitly called up for Kantokuen; in late 1941, a total of 13 BGUs and 11 Garrison Units in all of Manchuria, of these five (the 8th BGU, Arshaan Guards, and 9th, 1st, and 14th IGUs) were located west of the line TonghuaChangchunQiqihar. [54] Since the Japanese rated those formations as approximately brigade strength, the IJA would have a maximum of just over 5 division-equivalents for defensive warfare on the Western Front.
  6. Assumed command from General P.A. Kurochkin in July 1941
  7. In addition, the Pacific Fleet numbered 117,258 personnel while the Amur River Flotilla numbered 9,857.
  8. July to November 1941
  9. 84,324 Pacific Fleet and 9,857 Amur River Flotilla
  10. 154,692 Pacific Fleet and 14,337 Amur River Flotilla
  11. Includes NKVD personnel
  12. Includes approximately 50,000 NKVD personnel; total 703,714 across all branches.
  13. From General Chetverikov's notes, 12 December 1941. Includes approximately 50,000 NKVD personnel; total 1,343,307 across all branches.
  14. "Submarines" in Japanese estimates, "Warships" in Soviet data.
  15. Niehorster lists 12 fortified regions on 22 June 1941, 11 in the Far East Front (the 101st, 102nd, 103rd, 104th, 106th, 107th, 108th, 109th, 110th, 111th, and one unnamed) plus the Transbaikal fortified region in the west.
  16. When firing normal shells, the Type 7 short-barreled variant had a range of 11,750 m, while the long-barreled version could fire out to 14,800 m. [109]
  17. Organizationally, although Soviet forces amounted to some 32 division-equivalents by December 1941, [136] they were regarded as only barely sufficient for defensive operations. Compared to a typical Japanese division, prewar Red Army units had slightly less manpower, but had greater access to long-range higher-caliber artillery. After the German invasion, the Red Army was reorganized, and each division had scarcely half the manpower and a fraction of the firepower of either its German or Japanese counterparts. Hence, to achieve superiority on the battlefield, the Soviets would have to concentrate several divisions to counter each of their enemy's. [137]
  18. During the air war at Khalkhin Gol, both the Ki-27 and I-16 took about equal losses.
  19. Permanent divisions (Ko-Shidan), initially numbered 1–20 with the exception of the 13th, 15th, 17th, 18th, and Imperial Guards. [151] However, over the course of the war, other divisions were raised to either that or to A-1 (referred to as "strengthened (modified)" by the Americans) standard.
  20. According to the testimony of Masanobu Tsuji, the War Ministry estimated in August that if Japan pressed forward with an invasion of the Soviet Union under the conditions of the oil embargo, the IJA would run out of fuel within 6 to 12 months. [161]
  21. The last four were largely destroyed en route by US sea and air power.
  22. Figures are for RKKA only; including the Navy and adding self-propelled guns to the "tanks" total, the grand total was 1,747,465 personnel, 5,250 tanks and SPGs, and 5,171 aircraft. [197]
  23. Contrary to popular opinion, the Kwantung Army still possessed considerable fighting power. By the end of the war the IJA had about 664,000 men in Manchuria and 294,200 in Korea; [203] the USMC Official History noted of the matter, "Although the Kwantung Army reeled back from Soviet blows, most of its units were still intact and it was hardly ready to be counted out of the fight. The Japanese Emperor's Imperial Rescript which ordered his troops to lay down their arms was the only thing which prevented a protracted and costly battle." [204]
  24. Two days after the Kwantung Army's surrender on 19 August, the total number of prisoners in Soviet custody numbered 41,199. [207]

Related Research Articles

Battles of Khalkhin Gol 1939 border clashes between Imperial Japan and the Soviet Union

The Battles of Khalkhin Gol were the decisive engagements of the undeclared Soviet–Japanese border conflicts fought among the Soviet Union, Mongolia, Japan and Manchukuo in 1939. The conflict was named after the river Khalkhin Gol, which passes through the battlefield. In Japan, the decisive battle of the conflict is known as the Nomonhan Incident after Nomonhan, a nearby village on the border between Mongolia and Manchuria. The battles resulted in the defeat of the Japanese Sixth Army.

Type 97 Chi-Ha medium tank Medium tank

The Type 97 Chi-Ha was a medium tank used by the Imperial Japanese Army during the Second Sino-Japanese War, the Battles of Khalkhin Gol against the Soviet Union, and the Second World War. It was the most widely produced Japanese medium tank of World War II.

Invasion of the Kuril Islands

The Invasion of the Kuril Islands was the World War II Soviet military operation to capture the Kuril Islands from Japan in 1945. The invasion was part of the Soviet–Japanese War, and was decided on when plans to land on Hokkaido were abandoned. The successful military operations of the Red Army at Mudanjiang and during the Invasion of South Sakhalin created the necessary prerequisites for invasion of the Kuril Islands.

Kirill Meretskov

Kirill Afanasievich Meretskov was a Soviet military commander. Having joined the Communist Party in 1917, he served in the Red Army from 1920. During the Winter War of 1939–1940 against Finland, he had the task of penetrating the Mannerheim Line as commander of the 7th Army. He was awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union shortly afterwards.

Soviet invasion of Manchuria

The Soviet invasion of Manchuria, formally known as the Manchurian strategic offensive operation or simply the Manchurian operation, began on 9 August 1945 with the Soviet invasion of the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo. It was the largest campaign of the 1945 Soviet–Japanese War, which resumed hostilities between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Empire of Japan after almost six years of peace. Since 1983, the operation has sometimes been called Operation August Storm after U.S. Army historian David Glantz used this title for a paper on the subject.

Battle of Lake Khasan

The Battle of Lake Khasan, also known as the Changkufeng Incident in China and Japan, was an attempted military incursion by Manchukuo, a Japanese puppet state, into the territory claimed and controlled by the Soviet Union. That incursion was founded in the Japanese belief that the Soviet Union had misinterpreted the demarcation of the boundary based on the Treaty of Peking between Imperial Russia and Qing China and the subsequent supplementary agreements on demarcation and tampered with the demarcation markers. Japanese forces occupied the disputed area but withdrew after heavy fighting and a diplomatic settlement.

The Far Eastern Front was a front — a level of military formation that is equivalent to army group — of the Soviet Army during the Russian Civil War and the Second World War.

The 2nd Red Banner Army was a Soviet field army of World War II that served as part of the Far Eastern Front.

Type 95 Ha-Go light tank Light tank

The Type 95 Ha-Gō was a light tank used by the Empire of Japan during the Second Sino-Japanese War, at Nomonhan against the Soviet Union, and in the Second World War. It proved sufficient against infantry but, like the American M3 Stuart light tank, was not designed to combat other tanks. Approximately 2,300 were produced, making it the most numerous Japanese armoured fighting vehicle of the Second World War.

Soviet–Japanese War

The Soviet–Japanese War was a military conflict within the Second World War beginning soon after midnight on 9 August 1945, with the Soviet invasion of the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo. The Soviets and Mongolians ended Japanese control of Manchukuo, Mengjiang, northern Korea, Karafuto, and the Chishima Islands. The defeat of Japan's Kwantung Army helped bring about the Japanese surrender and the termination of World War II. The Soviet entry into the war was a significant factor in the Japanese government's decision to surrender unconditionally, as it made apparent that the Soviet Union was not willing to act as a third party in negotiating an end to hostilities on conditional terms.

Soviet–Japanese border conflicts

The Soviet–Japanese border conflicts, also known as the Soviet-Japanese Border War, was an undeclared border conflict fought between the Soviet Union and Japan in Northeast Asia from 1932 to 1939.

2nd Division (Imperial Japanese Army) 1888-1945 Imperial Japanese Army formation

The 2nd Division was an infantry division in the Imperial Japanese Army. Its tsūshōgō was Courageous Division.

Masaomi Yasuoka was a lieutenant general in the Imperial Japanese Army in World War II.

Type 97 ShinHoTo Chi-Ha medium tank Medium tank

The Type 97 Shinhoto Chi-Ha was a Japanese medium tank used in World War II that was an upgrade to the original Type 97 Chi-Ha. The new version was designated Type 97-Kai ("improved") or Shinhoto Chi-Ha. This design was considered to be the best Japanese tank to have seen combat service during the Pacific War.

Forty-Fourth Army (Japan)

The Japanese 44th Army was an army of the Imperial Japanese Army during the final stages of World War II.

Kwantung Army

The Kwantung Army was an army group of the Imperial Japanese Army from 1919 to 1945.

Hokushin-ron Imperial Japanese political doctrine emphasizing expansion into Northern Asia

Hokushin-ron was a pre-World War II political doctrine of the Empire of Japan which stated that Manchuria and Siberia were Japan's sphere of interest and that the potential value to Japan for economic and territorial expansion in those areas was greater than elsewhere. Its supporters were sometimes called the Strike North Group. It enjoyed wide support within the Imperial Japanese Army during the interwar period, but was abandoned in 1939 after military defeat on the Mongolian front at the Battles of Khalkhin Gol and the signing of Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact in 1941. It was superseded by the diametrically-opposite rival policy, Nanshin-ron, which regarded Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands as Japan's political and economic sphere of influence and aimed to acquire the resources of European colonies while neutralising the threat of Western military forces in the Pacific.

Battle of Mutanchiang 1945 Soviet-Japanese battle in Manchuria

The Battle of Mutanchiang was a large-scale military engagement fought between the forces of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Empire of Japan from August 12 to 16, 1945, as part of the Soviet invasion of Manchuria in World War II. Due to the short nature of that campaign, this was one of the only set-piece battles that transpired before its conclusion. During the battle, elements of the Japanese Fifth Army attempted to delay the Soviet Fifth Army and First Red Banner Army long enough to allow the bulk of the Japanese forces to retreat to more defensible positions. Though casualties on both sides were heavy, the Red Army forces were able to break through the hastily organized Japanese defenses and capture the city ten days ahead of schedule. Nevertheless, the Japanese defenders at Mutanchiang achieved their goal of allowing the main forces to escape.

The 361st Rifle Division formed in August 1941, as a standard Red Army rifle division, at Ufa. It may be considered a "sister" division to the 363rd Rifle Division. After forming, it was assigned to the 39th Army, and played a major role in the near-encirclement of the German 9th Army around Rzhev in the winter counteroffensive of 1941-42. In recognition of its successes it was reorganized as the 21st Guards Rifle Division in March 1942. A new 361st was formed in November 1944, in the far east of the USSR. It saw action during the Soviet invasion of Manchuria in August 1945, staging several crossing operations of the Amur and Songhua Rivers during the first days of the offensive, in recognition of which one regiment was awarded the Order of the Red Banner.

The 396th Rifle Division was raised in 1941 as an infantry division of the Red Army, and served twice during the Great Patriotic War in that role. The division followed a very similar combat path to that of the 398th Rifle Division in its 1st formation. It was first formed in August in the Transcaucasus Military District. In January, 1942 it was moved to the Crimea where it joined first the 47th and then the 44th Armies in Crimean Front. On May 8 it came under attack by the German 11th Army as part of Operation Trappenjagd and by the end of the month it was destroyed in the Kerch peninsula, being officially disbanded on June 14. In the buildup to the Soviet invasion of Manchuria a new 396th was formed in the Far Eastern Front in early 1945. The new division was one of only three formed in 1945 and served with the 2nd Red Banner Army, crossing the Amur River on August 11 and helping to reduce a Japanese fortified zone while also marching towards central Manchuria. Its rifle regiments were all decorated for their achievements and the division was disbanded before the end of the year.


  1. Coox p. 1045
  2. Coox p. 1041
  3. JSOM vol. I p. 147
  4. Cherevko p. 27
  5. Coox pp. 1046–1049
  6. Glantz p. 60
  7. Humphreys p. 25
  8. JSOM vol. I p. 23
  9. JSOM vol. I pp. 23–27
  10. JSOM vol. I pp. 29–31
  11. Coox p. 102
  12. Coox p. 109
  13. Cherevko p. 19
  14. Coox pp. 118–119
  15. JSOM vol. XIII pp. 54–55
  16. JSOM vol. I pp. 20–21; 75–76.
  17. JSOM vol. I p. 61
  18. Drea p. 14
  19. Coox pp. 123–128
  20. JSOM vol. I p. 105
  21. JSOM vol. I pp. 106–108
  22. JSOM vol. I, 1955
  23. JSOM vol. I p. 108
  24. USSBS p. 220
  25. Coox p. 91
  26. Mawdsley, 'Conclusion'
  27. Coox pp. 1035–1036
  28. Coox p. 1034
  29. JSOM vol. I p. 137
  30. Coox p. 1037
  31. Coox p. 1036
  32. Coox p. 1038
  33. Coox p. 1035
  34. JSOM vol. I p. 137-138
  35. Coox p. 1040
  36. Coox p. 1038
  37. Heinrichs ch. 5
  38. Coox p. 1037
  39. Coox pp. 1039–1040
  40. Coox pp. 1040–1041
  41. JSOM vol. I p. 157
  42. JSOM vol. I p. 147
  43. JSOM vol. I pp. 148–151
  44. Coox p. 1042
  45. IMTFE p. 401 Retrieved 7 September 2017
  46. Coox pp. 1042–1043
  47. Koshkin p. 20
  48. JSOM vol. I p. 181
  49. IMTFE pp. 401–402 Retrieved 7 September 2017
  50. JSOM vol. I p. 181
  51. Senshi Sosho vol. 20, pp. 364-367
  52. IMTFE, p. 23,285 Retrieved 3/5/21
  53. Coox p. 1172
  54. JM-77 p.7, p.26
  55. Coox p. 1043
  56. JSOM vol. XIII p. 33
  57. Coox p. 90
  58. JSOM vol. I p. 78
  59. JSOM vol. I p. 176
  60. JSOM vol. I pp. 87–89
  61. Senshi Sosho, vol. 20, pp.365-366.
  62. JSOM vol. XIII p. 9
  63. Shtemenko pp. 331–332, 336–337
  64. JSOM vol. I, 1955
  65. JSOM vol. XIII p. 17
  66. JSOM vol. XIII p. 18
  67. JSOM vol. XIII p. 19
  68. JSOM vol. XIII p. 19
  69. JSOM vol. XIII pp. 23–25
  70. JSOM vol. XIII pp. 21–22
  71. JSOM vol. XIII p. 22
  72. JSOM vol. XIII p. 10
  73. JSOM vol. XIII pp. 25–26
  74. JSOM vol. XIII p. 13
  75. JSOM vol. XIII pp. 14–15
  76. Shaposhnikov, 1938 www.alexanderyakovlev.org Retrieved 5 March 2017.
  77. Vasilevsky, March 1941 Retrieved 5 March 2017.
  78. JSOM vol. XIII pp. 36–37
  79. Biografia: Kovalyov, Mikhail Prokof'evich Retrieved 6 March 2017
  80. Niehorster FEF Retrieved 6 March 2017
  81. Niehorster TBF Retrieved 6 March 2017
  82. Niehorster FEF and TBMD
  83. Vladivostok Fortress Defenses Archived 2014-08-07 at the Wayback Machine fortress.wl.dvgu.ru Retrieved 7 March 2017
  84. Fortvl.ru Brief History of Vladivostok Retrieved 7 March 2017
  85. Glantz p. 3
  86. Glantz p. 42
  87. Glantz p. 5
  88. Coox p. 1055
  89. Cherevko p. 40
  90. Glantz p. 5
  91. Coox p. 1041
  92. GKO mobilization order, 22 July 1941 Retrieved 7 March 2017
  93. RGASPI Ф.644 оп.2 д.32 лл.166–167 sovdoc.rusarchives.ru Retrieved 7 March 2017
  94. GKO mobilization order, 22 July 1941 www.soldat.ru Retrieved 7 March 2017
  95. Zhumatiy 2006
  96. NKVD Border Troops, prewar Retrieved 7 March 2017
  97. Mongolia: a Country Study p. 235 cdn.loc.gov Retrieved 7 March 2017
  98. Niehorster FEF and TBMD
  99. JSOM vol. XIII p.47
  100. IVMV vol.11 p.184
  101. Coox p. 1052
  102. The Kwantung versus the Siberian Army, October 21, 1941 Retrieved 7 March 2021
  103. JSOM vol. I p.170, JSOM vol. XIII p.47
  104. IVMV vol.11 p.184
  105. Zolotarev pp. 126–130
  106. JSOM vol. XIII p. 101
  107. JSOM vol. XIII pp. 101–102, 105–106
  108. JSOM vol. XIII p. 103
  109. Taki's IJA: Type 7 30cm Howitzer Retrieved 17 March 2017
  110. Coox p. 1026
  111. Zolotarev pp.127–128
  112. Zolotarev p. 127
  113. JSOM vol. XIII 103
  114. Zolotarev p. 129
  115. Zolotarev pp. 127, 129
  116. Zolotarev p. 128
  117. JM-45 p. 27, Retrieved 4/2/2021
  118. USSBS, "The Effect of Air Action on Japanese Ground Army Logistics" p. 91, Exhibit V.
  119. Senshi Sosho vol. 99 pp. 316-317
  120. Coox p. 580
  121. Coox p. 497
  122. Coox p. 520
  123. Coox p. 506
  124. Drea pp. 89–90
  125. Coox pp. 1051–1052
  126. Drea p. 90
  127. Coox p. 1051
  128. Coox pp. 1026–1027
  129. USSBS Report 63 p. 71 Retrieved 12 August 2017.
  130. Analysis of RKKA Tanks' state on June 1, 1941 Retrieved 13 March 2017
  131. Niehorster FEF and TMBD
  132. Shtemenko p. 333
  133. Shtemenko p. 332
  134. Shtemenko p. 333
  135. JSOM vol. I pp. 30–31
  136. Glantz p. 5
  137. TM-30-430 pp. III-1 to III-3
  138. JSOM vol XIII p. 14
  139. Japanese Tank and Antitank Warfare p. 45 Retrieved 17 March 2017
  140. Coox, pp. 432–433
  141. Coox p. 993
  142. Coox p. 1085
  143. Kondrat'ev, "Results and Lessons" Retrieved 18 March 2017
  144. WW2DB: A6M Zero Retrieved 18 March 2017
  145. Militaryfactory.com: Ki-21 Retrieved 18 March 2017
  146. Militaryfactory.com: Tupolev SB-2 Retrieved 18 March 2017
  147. Pacific War Encyclopedia: Fighter Pilots Retrieved 18 March 2017
  148. Khazanov and Medved pp. 50–51
  149. Glantz p. 4
  150. Giangreco p. 9
  151. AH.com: IJA Divisions, an Overview Retrieved 16 March 2017
  152. Coox pp. 1127–1128
  153. Pacific War Encyclopedia: Kuribayashi, Tadamichi Retrieved 16 March 2017
  154. Coox p. 1044
  155. The Kwantung versus the Siberian Army, 21 October 1941 Retrieved 19 March 2017
  156. Senshi Sosho vol. 73 p. 81
  157. Coox p. 1037
  158. Coox pp. 1045–1046
  159. Coox p. 1046
  160. American Foreign Relations: Oil and World Power Retrieved 19 March 2017
  161. Koshkin p. 26
  162. Coox p. 1049
  163. Coox p. 1049
  164. Coox pp. 1051–1052
  165. Koshkin p. 20
  166. Coox pp. 1051–1052
  167. Coox p. 1053
  168. Coox p. 1051
  169. JM-77 p. 23
  170. JM-77 p. 24
  171. JM-77 p. 28
  172. Coox p. 1057
  173. Coox pp. 1172–1173
  174. Coox pp. 1058–1059
  175. Giangreco p. 18
  176. Coox p. 1059
  177. Giangreco p. 19
  178. Giangreco pp. 19–20
  179. Coox p. 1059
  180. Giangreco pp. 20–21
  181. Giangreco p. 21
  182. Giangreco p. 22
  183. JSOM vol. I p. 160
  184. JSOM vol. I pp. 160–164
  185. JSOM vol. I pp 173–175
  186. Coox p. 1063
  187. The Pacific War Encyclopedia: Manchuria Retrieved 21 March 2017
  188. Coox pp. 1062–1064
  189. Coox p. 1062
  190. The Pacific War Encyclopedia: Manchuria
  191. Coox pp. 1064–1065
  192. Coox p. 1062
  193. Cherevko p. 40 table 6
  194. Shtemenko pp. 326–327
  195. JSOM vol. I p. 170
  196. Glantz p. 101
  197. Cherevko p. 40 table 7
  198. Shtemenko p. 336
  199. Shtemenko pp. 336–337
  200. Coox p. 1066
  201. Coox p. 1067
  202. Coox pp. 1071–1073
  203. Australian War Memorial: Dispositions and Deaths Retrieved 21 March 2017
  204. History of US Marine Corps Operations in World War II: Part V p. 530 Retrieved 21 March 2017
  205. Glantz p. 337
  206. Coox p. 1176
  207. Cherevko p. 41