# LF-space

Last updated

In mathematics, an LF-space, also written (LF)-space, is a topological vector space (TVS) X that is a locally convex inductive limit of a countable inductive system ${\displaystyle (X_{n},i_{nm})}$ of Fréchet spaces. [1] This means that X is a direct limit of a direct system ${\displaystyle (X_{n},i_{nm})}$ in the category of locally convex topological vector spaces and each ${\displaystyle X_{n}}$ is a Fréchet space.

## Contents

If each of the bonding maps ${\displaystyle i_{nm}}$ is an embedding of TVSs then the LF-space is called a strict LF-space. This means that the subspace topology induced on Xn by Xn+1 is identical to the original topology on Xn. [1] [2] Some authors (e.g. Schaefer) define the term "LF-space" to mean "strict LF-space," so when reading mathematical literature, it is recommended to always check how LF-space is defined.

## Definition

### Inductive/final/direct limit topology

Throughout, it is assumed that

• ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}$ is either the category of topological spaces or some subcategory of the category of topological vector spaces (TVSs);
• If all objects in the category have an algebraic structure, then all morphisms are assumed to be homomorphisms for that algebraic structure.
• I is a non-empty directed set;
• X = (Xi)iI is a family of objects in ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}$ where (Xi, τXi) is a topological space for every index i;
• To avoid potential confusion, τXi should not be called Xi's "initial topology" since the term "initial topology" already has a well-known definition. The topology τXi is called the original topology on Xi or Xi's given topology.
• X is a set (and if objects in ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}$ also have algebraic structures, then X is automatically assumed to have has whatever algebraic structure is needed);
• f = (fi)iI is a family of maps where for each index i, the map has prototype fi:(Xi, τXi)X. If all objects in the category have an algebraic structure, then these maps are also assumed to be homomorphisms for that algebraic structure.

If it exists, then the final topology on X in ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}$, also called the colimit or inductive topology in ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}$, and denoted by τf or τf, is the finest topology on X such that

1. (X, τf) is an object in ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}$, and
2. for every index i, the map fi:(Xi, τXi)(X, τf) is a continuous morphism in ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}$.

In the category of topological spaces, the final topology always exists and moreover, a subset UX is open (resp. closed) in (X, τf) if and only if fi- 1(U) is open (resp. closed) in (Xi, τXi) for every index i.

However, the final topology may not exist in the category of Hausdorff topological spaces due to the requirement that (X, τXf) belong to the original category (i.e. belong to the category of Hausdorff topological spaces). [3]

### Direct systems

Suppose that (I, ≤) is a directed set and that for all indices ij there are (continuous) morphisms in ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}$

fij : XiXj

such that if i = j then fij is the identity map on Xi and if ijk then the following compatibility condition is satisfied:

fik=fjkfij,

where this means that the composition

${\displaystyle X_{i}\xrightarrow {f_{i}^{j}} X_{j}\xrightarrow {f_{j}^{k}} X_{k}\;\;\;\;{\text{ is equal to }}\;\;\;\;X_{i}\xrightarrow {f_{i}^{k}} X_{k}.}$

If the above conditions are satisfied then the triple formed by the collections of these objects, morphisms, and the indexing set

${\displaystyle \left(X_{\bullet },\left\{f_{i}^{j}\;:\;i,j\in I\;{\text{ and }}\;i\leq j\right\},I\right)}$

is known as a direct system in the category ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}$ that is directed (or indexed) by I. Since the indexing set I is a directed set, the direct system is said to be directed. [4] The maps fij are called the bonding, connecting, or linkingmaps of the system.

If the indexing set I is understood then I is often omitted from the above tuple (i.e. not written); the same is true for the bonding maps if they are understood. Consequently, one often sees written "X is a direct system" where "X" actually represents a triple with the bonding maps and indexing set either defined elsewhere (e.g. canonical bonding maps, such as natural inclusions) or else the bonding maps are merely assumed to exist but there is no need to assign symbols to them (e.g. the bonding maps are not needed to state a theorem).

### Direct limit of a direct system

For the construction of a direct limit of a general inductive system, please see the article: direct limit.

Direct limits of injective systems

If each of the bonding maps ${\displaystyle f_{i}^{j}}$ is injective then the system is called injective. [4]

Assumptions: In the case where the direct system is injective, it is often assumed without loss of generality that for all indices ij, each Xi is a vector subspace of Xj (in particular, Xi is identified with the range of ${\displaystyle f_{i}^{j}}$) and that the bonding map ${\displaystyle f_{i}^{j}}$ is the natural inclusion
Inj
i
:XiXj

(i.e. defined by xx) so that that the subspace topology on Xi induced by Xj is weaker (i.e. coarser) than the original (i.e. given) topology on Xi.

In this case, also take

X:=Xi.
The limit maps are then the natural inclusions Ini:XiX. The direct limit topology on X is the final topology induced by these inclusion maps.

If the Xi's have an algebraic structure, say addition for example, then for any x, yX, we pick any index i such that x, yXi and then define their sum using by using the addition operator of Xi. That is,

x+y:=x+iy,

where +i is the addition operator of Xi. This sum is independent of the index i that is chosen.

In the category of locally convex topological vector spaces, the topology on the direct limit X of an injective directed inductive limit of locally convex spaces can be described by specifying that an absolutely convex subset U of X is a neighborhood of 0 if and only if UXi is an absolutely convex neighborhood of 0 in Xi for every index i. [4]

Direct limits in Top

Direct limits of directed direct systems always exist in the categories of sets, topological spaces, groups, and locally convex TVSs. In the category of topological spaces, if every bonding map fij is/is a injective (resp. surjective, bijective, homeomorphism, topological embedding, quotient map) then so is every fi : XiX. [3]

#### Problem with direct limits

Direct limits in the categories of topological spaces, topological vector spaces (TVSs), and Hausdorff locally convex TVSs are "poorly behaved". [4] For instance, the direct limit of a sequence (i.e. indexed by the natural numbers) of locally convex nuclear Fréchet spaces may fail to be Hausdorff (in which case the direct limit does not exist in the category of Hausdorff TVSs). For this reason, only certain "well-behaved" direct systems are usually studied in functional analysis. Such systems include LF-spaces. [4] However, non-Hausdorff locally convex inductive limits do occur in natural questions of analysis. [4]

### Strict inductive limit

If each of the bonding maps ${\displaystyle f_{i}^{j}}$ is an embedding of TVSs onto proper vector subspaces and if the system is directed by with its natural ordering, then the resulting limit is called a strict (countable) direct limit. In such a situation we may assume without loss of generality that each Xi is a vector subspace of Xi+1 and that the subspace topology induced on Xi by Xi+1 is identical to the original topology on Xi. [1]

In the category of locally convex topological vector spaces, the topology on a strict inductive limit of Fréchet spaces X can be described by specifying that an absolutely convex subset U is a neighborhood of 0 if and only if UXn is an absolutely convex neighborhood of 0 in Xn for every n.

## Properties

An inductive limit in the category of locally convex TVSs of a family of bornological (resp. barrelled, quasi-barrelled) spaces has this same property. [5]

### LF-spaces

Every LF-space is a meager subset of itself. [6] The strict inductive limit of a sequence of complete locally convex spaces (such as Fréchet spaces) is necessarily complete. In particular, every LF-space is complete. [7] Every LF-space is barrelled and bornological, which together with completeness implies that every LF-space is ultrabornological. An LF-space that is the inductive limit of a countable sequence of separable spaces is separable. [8] LF spaces are distinguished and their strong duals are bornological and barrelled (a result due to Alexander Grothendieck).

If X is the strict inductive limit of an increasing sequence of Fréchet space Xn then a subset B of X is bounded in X if and only if there exists some n such that B is a bounded subset of Xn. [7]

A linear map from an LF-space into another TVS is continuous if and only if it is sequentially continuous. [9] A linear map from an LF-space X into a Fréchet space Y is continuous if and only if its graph is closed in X×Y. [10] Every bounded linear operator from an LF-space into another TVS is continuous. [11]

If X is an LF-space defined by a sequence ${\displaystyle \left(X_{i}\right)_{i=1}^{\infty }}$ then the strong dual space ${\displaystyle X_{b}^{\prime }}$ of X is a Fréchet space if and only if all Xi are normable. [12] Thus the strong dual space of an LF-space is a Fréchet space if and only if it is an LB-space.

## Examples

### Space of smooth compactly supported functions

A typical example of an LF-space is, ${\displaystyle C_{c}^{\infty }(\mathbb {R} ^{n})}$, the space of all infinitely differentiable functions on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$ with compact support. The LF-space structure is obtained by considering a sequence of compact sets ${\displaystyle K_{1}\subset K_{2}\subset \ldots \subset K_{i}\subset \ldots \subset \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$ with ${\displaystyle \bigcup _{i}K_{i}=\mathbb {R} ^{n}}$ and for all i, ${\displaystyle K_{i}}$ is a subset of the interior of ${\displaystyle K_{i+1}}$. Such a sequence could be the balls of radius i centered at the origin. The space ${\displaystyle C_{c}^{\infty }(K_{i})}$ of infinitely differentiable functions on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$ with compact support contained in ${\displaystyle K_{i}}$ has a natural Fréchet space structure and ${\displaystyle C_{c}^{\infty }(\mathbb {R} ^{n})}$ inherits its LF-space structure as described above. The LF-space topology does not depend on the particular sequence of compact sets ${\displaystyle K_{i}}$.

With this LF-space structure, ${\displaystyle C_{c}^{\infty }(\mathbb {R} ^{n})}$ is known as the space of test functions, of fundamental importance in the theory of distributions.

### Direct limit of finite-dimensional spaces

Suppose that for every positive integer n, Xn := ℝn and for m < n, consider Xm as a vector subspace of Xn via the canonical embedding XmXn defined by x := (x1, ..., xm) ↦ (x1, ..., xm, 0, ..., 0). Denote the resulting LF-space by X. The continuous dual space ${\displaystyle X^{\prime }}$ of X is equal to the algebraic dual space of X and the weak topology on ${\displaystyle X^{\prime }}$ is equal to the strong topology on ${\displaystyle X^{\prime }}$ (i.e. ${\displaystyle X_{\sigma }^{\prime }=X_{b}^{\prime }}$). [13] Furthermore, the canonical map of X into the continuous dual space of ${\displaystyle X_{\sigma }^{\prime }}$ is surjective. [13]

## Citations

1. Schaefer & Wolff 1999, pp. 55-61.
2. Helgason, Sigurdur (2000). Groups and geometric analysis : integral geometry, invariant differential operators, and spherical functions (Reprinted with corr. ed.). Providence, R.I: American Mathematical Society. p. 398. ISBN   0-8218-2673-5.
3. Dugundji 1966, pp. 420-435.
4. Bierstedt 1988, pp. 41-56.
5. Grothendieck 1973, pp. 130-142.
6. Narici & Beckenstein 2011, p. 435.
7. Schaefer & Wolff 1999, pp. 59-61.
8. Narici & Beckenstein 2011, p. 436.
9. Trèves 2006, p. 141.
10. Trèves 2006, p. 173.
11. Trèves 2006, p. 142.
12. Trèves 2006, p. 201.
13. Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 201.

## Related Research Articles

In mathematics, a topological vector space is one of the basic structures investigated in functional analysis. A topological vector space is a vector space which is also a topological space, this implies that vector space operations be continuous functions. More specifically, its topological space has a uniform topological structure, allowing a notion of uniform convergence.

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, Fréchet spaces, named after Maurice Fréchet, are special topological vector spaces. They are generalizations of Banach spaces. All Banach and Hilbert spaces are Fréchet spaces. Spaces of infinitely differentiable functions are typical examples of Fréchet spaces, many of which are typically not Banach spaces.

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, locally convex topological vector spaces (LCTVS) or locally convex spaces are examples of topological vector spaces (TVS) that generalize normed spaces. They can be defined as topological vector spaces whose topology is generated by translations of balanced, absorbent, convex sets. Alternatively they can be defined as a vector space with a family of seminorms, and a topology can be defined in terms of that family. Although in general such spaces are not necessarily normable, the existence of a convex local base for the zero vector is strong enough for the Hahn–Banach theorem to hold, yielding a sufficiently rich theory of continuous linear functionals.

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, a barrelled space is a topological vector space (TVS) for which every barrelled set in the space is a neighbourhood for the zero vector. A barrelled set or a barrel in a topological vector space is a set that is convex, balanced, absorbing, and closed. Barrelled spaces are studied because a form of the Banach–Steinhaus theorem still holds for them.

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, a Montel space, named after Paul Montel, is any topological vector space (TVS) in which an analog of Montel's theorem holds. Specifically, a Montel space is a barrelled topological vector space in which every closed and bounded subset is compact.

In mathematics, particularly in functional analysis, a bornological space is a type of space which, in some sense, possesses the minimum amount of structure needed to address questions of boundedness of sets and linear maps, in the same way that a topological space possesses the minimum amount of structure needed to address questions of continuity. Bornological spaces are distinguished by that property that a linear map from a bornological space into any locally convex spaces is continuous if and only if it is a bounded linear operator.

In general topology and related areas of mathematics, the final topology on a set with respect to a family of functions from topological spaces into is the finest topology on that makes all those functions continuous.

In mathematics, a nuclear space is a topological vector space that can be viewed as a generalization of finite dimensional Euclidean spaces that is different from Hilbert spaces. Nuclear spaces have many of the desirable properties of finite-dimensional vector spaces. The topology on them can be defined by a family of seminorms whose unit balls decrease rapidly in size. Vector spaces whose elements are "smooth" in some sense tend to be nuclear spaces; a typical example of a nuclear space is the set of smooth functions on a compact manifold.

In mathematics, particularly in functional analysis, a webbed space is a topological vector space designed with the goal of allowing the results of the open mapping theorem and the closed graph theorem to hold for a wider class of linear maps whose codomains are webbed spaces. A space is called webbed if there exists a collection of sets, called a web that satisfies certain properties. Webs were first investigated by de Wilde.

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, a complete topological vector space is a topological vector space (TVS) with the property that whenever points get progressively closer to each other, then there exists some point towards which they all get closer to. The notion of "points that get progressively closer" is made rigorous by Cauchy nets or Cauchy filters, which are generalizations of Cauchy sequences, while "point towards which they all get closer to" means that this net or filter converges to Unlike the notion of completeness for metric spaces, which it generalizes, the notion of completeness for TVSs does not depend on any metric and is defined for all TVSs, including those that are not metrizable or Hausdorff.

The strongest locally convex topological vector space (TVS) topology on the tensor product of two locally convex TVSs, making the canonical map continuous is called the projective topology or the π-topology. When is endowed with this topology then it is denoted by and called the projective tensor product of and

In mathematics, the injective tensor product of two topological vector spaces (TVSs) was introduced by Alexander Grothendieck and was used by him to define nuclear spaces. An injective tensor product is in general not necessarily complete, so its completion is called the completed injective tensor products. Injective tensor products have applications outside of nuclear spaces. In particular, as described below, up to TVS-isomorphism, many TVSs that are defined for real or complex valued functions, for instance, the Schwartz space or the space of continuously differentiable functions, can be immediately extended to functions valued in a Hausdorff locally convex TVS Y without any need to extend definitions from real/complex-valued functions to Y-valued functions.

In mathematics, an LB-space, also written (LB)-space, is a topological vector space that is a locally convex inductive limit of a countable inductive system of Banach spaces. This means that is a direct limit of a direct system in the category of locally convex topological vector spaces and each is a Banach space.

In functional analysis, a topological vector space (TVS) is called ultrabornological if every bounded linear operator from into another TVS is necessarily continuous. A general version of the closed graph theorem holds for ultrabornological spaces. Ultrabornological spaces were introduced by Alexander Grothendieck.

In the mathematical discipline of functional analysis, differentiable vector-valued functions from Euclidean space are differentiable TVS-valued functions whose domains are subset of finite-dimensional Euclidean space. It is possible to generalize the notion of derivative to functions whose domain and codomain are subsets of arbitrary topological vector spaces (TVSs) in multiple ways. But when the domain of a TVS-valued function is a subset of a finite-dimensional Euclidean space then many of these notions become logically equivalent resulting in a much more limited number of generalizations of the derivative and additionally, differentiability is also more well-behaved compared to the general case. This article presents the theory of -times continuously differentiable functions on an open subset of Euclidean space , which is an important special case of differentiation between arbitrary TVSs. This importance stems partially from the fact that every finite-dimensional vector subspace of a Hausdorff topological vector space is TVS isomorphic to Euclidean space so that, for example, this special case can be applied to any function whose domain is an arbitrary Hausdorff TVS by restricting it to finite-dimensional vector subspaces.

In functional analysis, a topological homomorphism or simply homomorphism is the analog of homomorphisms for the category of topological vector spaces (TVSs). This concept is of considerable importance in functional analysis and the famous open mapping theorem gives a sufficient condition for a continuous linear map between Fréchet spaces to be a topological homomorphism.

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, a metrizable topological vector space (TVS) is a TVS whose topology is induced by a metric. An LM-space is an inductive limit of a sequence of locally convex metrizable TVS.

F. Riesz's theorem is an important theorem in functional analysis that states that a Hausdorff topological vector space (TVS) is finite-dimensional if and only if it is locally compact. The theorem and its consequences are used ubiquitously in functional analysis, often used without being explicitly mentioned.

In mathematics, particularly in functional analysis and topology, the closed graph theorem is a fundamental result stating that a linear operator with a closed graph will, under certain conditions, be continuous. The original result has been generalized many times so there are now many theorems referred to as "closed graph theorems."

In mathematical analysis, the spaces of test functions and distributions are topological vector spaces (TVSs) that are used in the definition and application of distributions. Test functions are usually infinitely differentiable complex-valued functions on a non-empty open subset that have compact support. The space of all test functions, denoted by is endowed with a certain topology, called the canonical LF-topoogy, that makes into a complete Hausdorff locally convex TVS. The strong dual space of is called the space of distributions on and is denoted by where the "" subscript indicates that the continuous dual space of denote by is endowed with the strong dual topology.