This is a list of major cases decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. These include appeals from the following countries: [1]
Case name | Citation | Subject |
---|---|---|
Cunningham v Homma (British Columbia, Canada) | [1903] A.C. 151 | Law preventing Japanese vote found valid; overridden by the Canadian Citizenship Act 1946 |
Bank of Montreal v Stuart | [1910] UKPC 53 | Undue influence |
Attorney-General for Ontario v Attorney-General of Canada (Reference Appeal) (Ontario, Canada) | [1912] A.C. 571 | |
Royal Bank of Canada v. The King (Canada) | [1913] A.C. 283 | |
Canada v. Alberta [3] (Canada) | [1922] A.C. 191 | Emergency doctrine of Constitution of Canada |
Fort Frances Pulp and Paper v. Manitoba Free Press (Canada) | (1923) | |
Brooks-Bidlake and Whittall Limited v. Attorney-General for British Columbia (Canada) | [1923] A.C. 450 (P.C.) | |
Toronto Electric Commissioners v. Snider (Ontario, Canada) | [1925] A.C. 396 | |
Nadan v The King (Canada) | [1926] A.C. 482(PC) | Removal of Canadian appeal to the JCPC held unconstitutional |
1926 – criminal appeals from Canada permitted | ||
Edwards v. Canada (Attorney General) (Canada) | [1930] A.C. 124 | Women's right to sit in the Senate |
Proprietary Articles Trade Association v. Attorney General of Canada (Canada) | [1931] A.C. 310 (P.C.) | |
In re Regulation and Control of Aeronautics in Canada [4] (Canada) | [1932] A.C. 54 | |
In re Regulation and Control of Radio Communication in Canada [5] (Canada) | [1932] A.C. 304 | |
1933 – no more criminal appeals from Canada | ||
British Coal Corporation v. the King (Canada) | [1935] A.C. 500 | Upheld authority of Canadian Parliament to abolish appeals to the Privy Council in criminal cases. |
Attorney-General of Canada v. Attorney-General of Ontario (Labour Conventions) (Ontario, Canada) | [1937] A.C. 326 | |
Sifton v. Sifton | [1938] A.C. 656 | Certainty of conditions in a devise |
Vita Food Products Inc. v. Unus Shipping Co. Ltd. (Nova Scotia, Canada) | [1939] A.C. 277 | An express choice of law clause in a contract should be honoured as long as the agreement was bona fide and not against public policy. |
Francis, Day & Hunter Ltd. v. Twentieth Century Fox Corp. | [1939] 4 D.L.R. 353 | Copyright in titles |
Ontario (Attorney General) v. Canada Temperance Federation (Ontario, Canada) | (1946) | Examined the peace, order, and good government power of the Constitution Act, 1867 |
1949 – no more civil appeals from Canada | ||
Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor | [1956] 1 WLR 965 | Hearsay exception |
Overseas Tankship v Morts Dock & Engineering Co. Ltd. (The Wagon Mound No. 1) (Australia) | [1961] A.C. 388 | Leading authority on remoteness of damage in negligence. |
Overseas Tankship v Miller Steamship Co. (The Wagon Mound No. 2) (Australia) | [1967] A.C. 617 | Defined remoteness of damages in a nuisance tort action |
Goldman v Hargrave | [1967] 1 A.C. 645 | |
The Eurymedon (New Zealand) | [1975] A.C. 154 | Conditions of when a third party may seek protection of an exclusion clause in a contract between two parties. |
Pao On v. Lau Yiu Long (Hong Kong) | [1980] A.C. 614 | |
Ong Ah Chuan v. Public Prosecutor (Singapore) | [1980] UKPC 32 , [1981] A.C. 648, [1981] 1 M.L.J. [Malayan Law Journal] 64, [1979–1980] S.L.R.(R.) [Singapore Law Reports (Reissue)] 710 | Constitutionality of provisions in the Misuse of Drugs Act 1973 (No. 5 of 1973) creating a rebuttable presumption of drug trafficking and imposing the mandatory death penalty for certain drug trafficking offences. |
Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v. Pub Squash Co Pty Ltd | [1980] 2 N.S.W.L.R. 851 (JCPC) | |
1989 – appeals from Singapore restricted | ||
Lee Ting Sang v Chung Chi-Keung (Hong Kong) | [1990] UKPC 9 | |
1994 – no more appeals from Singapore | ||
Goss v Chilcott | [1996] UKPC 17 (23 May 1996) | |
1997 – no more appeals from Hong Kong | ||
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) is the highest court of appeal for the Crown Dependencies, the British Overseas Territories, some Commonwealth countries and a few institutions in the United Kingdom. Established on 14 August 1833 to hear appeals formerly heard by the King-in-Council, the Privy Council formerly acted as the court of last resort for the entire British Empire, other than for the United Kingdom itself.
Canadian federalism involves the current nature and historical development of the federal system in Canada.
John Sankey, 1st Viscount Sankey, was a British lawyer, judge, Labour politician and Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, famous for many of his judgments in the House of Lords. He gave his name to the Sankey Declaration of the Rights of Man (1940).
In Canadian law, a reference question or reference case is a submission by the federal or a provincial government to the courts asking for an advisory opinion on a major legal issue. Typically the question concerns the constitutionality of legislation.
The Caribbean Court of Justice is the judicial institution of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM). Established in 2005, it is based in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago.
Ontario (AG) v Canada Temperance Federation was a famous Canadian constitutional decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and was among the first cases to examine the peace, order, and good government power of the Constitution Act, 1867. It was the first decision to bring back the "national concerns" branch of peace, order and good government since it was first suggested in the Local Prohibitions case.
In most legal jurisdictions, a supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts.
British Coal Corp v R is a decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in which the authority of the Canadian Parliament to prohibit appeals to the JCPC in criminal cases was upheld.
This is a list of Lord Sankey's decisions from the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. Sankey served as the Lord Chancellor from 7 June 1929 – 7 June 1935. Prior to his appointment to the JCPC, Sankey served as Lord Justice of Appeal in 1928 and High Court, King's Bench Division, in 1914.
The Provincial Fisheries Reference was a lawsuit decided in 1898 by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC). It arose from a government turf war in Canada over the jurisdictional boundaries of property rights in relation to rivers, lakes, harbours, fisheries, and other cognate subjects. The 12-page judgment was delivered by Lord Hershell, and followed on from R v Robertson (1882). This case in the JCPC was an amalgamation of three separate Supreme Court of Canada appeals, which were grouped into one because of their similarities. The judgment broke little ground, and can be considered a ringing affirmation of the Strong court.
Until 1933, Article 66 of the Constitution of the Irish Free State permitted appeals of decisions of the Supreme Court of the Irish Free State to be made to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) in London. This was a requirement of the Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1921, which underpinned the creation of the Irish Free State. The treaty specified that the Free State's constitutional status would be the same as Canada, another British Dominion, whose local courts allowed further appeal to the JCPC.