Melbourne–Voyager collision

Last updated

MelbourneVoyager collision
Date 10 February 1964
Place Jervis Bay, Australia
Vessels involvedHMAS Melbourne
HMAS Voyager
Cause Navigational error resulting in collision
Result • HMAS Voyager sunk
• 14 officers, 67 sailors, and 1 civilian aboard Voyager killed
• HMAS Melbourne damaged

The MelbourneVoyager collision, also referred to as the "MelbourneVoyager incident" or simply the "Voyager incident", was a collision between two warships of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN); the aircraft carrier HMAS Melbourne and the destroyer HMAS Voyager.

Royal Australian Navy naval warfare branch of the Australian Defence Force

The Royal Australian Navy (RAN) is the naval branch of the Australian Defence Force. Following the Federation of Australia in 1901, the ships and resources of the separate colonial navies were integrated into a national force, called the Commonwealth Naval Forces. Originally intended for local defence, the navy was granted the title of 'Royal Australian Navy' in 1911, and became increasingly responsible for defence of the region.

HMAS <i>Melbourne</i> (R21) 1955-1982 Majestic-class aircraft carrier of Royal Australian Navy

HMAS Melbourne (R21) was a Majestic-class light aircraft carrier of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Operating from 1955 until 1982, she was the third and final conventional aircraft carrier to serve in the RAN. Melbourne was the only Commonwealth naval vessel to sink two friendly warships in peacetime collisions.

HMAS Voyager was a Daring-class destroyer of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN), that was lost in a collision in 1964.


On the evening of 10 February 1964, the two ships were performing manoeuvres off Jervis Bay. Melbourne's aircraft were performing flying exercises, and Voyager was tasked as plane guard, positioned behind and to port (left) of the carrier in order to rescue the crew of any ditching or crashing aircraft. After a series of turns effected to reverse the courses of the two ships, Voyager ended up ahead and to starboard (right) of the carrier. The destroyer was ordered to resume plane guard position, which would involve turning to starboard, away from the carrier, then looping around behind. Instead, Voyager began a starboard turn, but then came around to port. The bridge crew on Melbourne assumed that Voyager was zig-zagging to let the carrier overtake her, and would then assume her correct position. Senior personnel on Voyager were not paying attention to the manoeuvre. At 20:55, officers on both ships began desperate avoiding manoeuvres, but by then a collision was inevitable.

Jervis Bay bay in New South Wales, Australia

Jervis Bay is a 102-square-kilometre (39 sq mi) oceanic bay and village on the south coast of New South Wales, Australia, said to possess the whitest sand in the world.

Plane guard

A plane guard is a warship or helicopter tasked to recover the aircrew of planes or helicopters which ditch or crash in the water during aircraft carrier flight operations.

Melbourne struck Voyager at 20:56, with the carrier's bow striking just behind the bridge and cutting the destroyer in two. Of the 314 aboard Voyager, 82 were killed, most of whom died immediately or were trapped in the heavy bow section, which sank after 10 minutes. The rest of the ship sank after midnight. Melbourne, although damaged, suffered no fatalities, and was able to sail to Sydney the next morning with most of the Voyager survivors aboard – the rest had been taken to the naval base HMAS Creswell.

The RAN proposed a Board of Inquiry to investigate the collision, but a series of incidents during the 1950s and 1960s had led to a public mistrust of Navy-run investigations, and as proposals for an inquiry supervised by a federal judge were not acted upon, a full Royal Commission became the only avenue for an externally supervised inquiry. The four-month Royal Commission, headed by Sir John Spicer, [1] concluded that Voyager was primarily at fault for failing to maintain effective situational awareness, but also criticised Melbourne's captain, John Robertson, and his officers for not alerting the destroyer to the danger they were in. Robertson was posted to a shore base and banned from serving again at sea; he resigned soon after. Opinions were that the Royal Commission had been poorly handled, and Robertson had been made a scapegoat.

John Spicer (Australian politician) Australian lawyer, politician, cabinet minister and judge

Sir John Armstrong Spicer was an Australian lawyer, politician, and judge. He served two terms as a Senator for Victoria, representing the United Australia Party (UAP) from 1940 to 1944 and the Liberal Party from 1950 to 1956. Spicer was Attorney-General in the Menzies Government from 1949 to 1956. He left politics to become chief judge of the newly created Commonwealth Industrial Court, a position which he held until 1976.

Increasing pressure over the results of the first Royal Commission, along with allegations by former Voyager executive officer Peter Cabban that Captain Duncan Stevens was unfit for command, prompted a second Royal Commission in 1967: the only time in Australian history that two Royal Commissions have been held to investigate the same incident. Although Cabban's claims revolved primarily around Stevens' drinking to excess, the second Royal Commission found that Stevens was unfit to command for medical reasons. Consequently, the findings of the first Royal Commission were based on incorrect assumptions, and Robertson and his officers were not to blame for the collision.


HMAS Melbourne underway with the Daring-class destroyers Vendetta and Voyager in 1959 HMAS Melbourne (R21), HMAS Voyager (D04) and HMAS Vendetta (D08) underway, circa in 1959 (AWM 301014).jpg
HMAS Melbourne underway with the Daring-class destroyers Vendetta and Voyager in 1959

HMAS Melbourne

HMAS Melbourne was the lead ship of the Majesticclass of aircraft carriers. [2] She was laid down for the Royal Navy on 15 April 1943 at Vickers-Armstrongs' Naval Construction Yard in Barrow-in-Furness, England, and launched on 28 February 1945. [2] [3] Work was suspended at the end of World War II, and did not resume until the Australian government purchased her and sister ship HMAS Sydney in 1947. [3] Melbourne was heavily upgraded to operate jet aircraft, and became only the third aircraft carrier in the world to be constructed with an angled flight deck. [4] The carrier was commissioned into the RAN on 28 October 1955. [2]

Vickers-Armstrongs Limited was a British engineering conglomerate formed by the merger of the assets of Vickers Limited and Sir W G Armstrong Whitworth & Company in 1927. The majority of the company was nationalised in the 1960s and 1970s, with the remainder being divested as Vickers plc in 1977.

Barrow-in-Furness town and seaport in the county of Cumbria, England

Barrow-in-Furness, commonly known as Barrow, is a town and borough in Cumbria, England. Historically part of Lancashire, it was incorporated as a municipal borough in 1867 and merged with Dalton-in-Furness Urban District in 1974 to form the Borough of Barrow-in-Furness. At the tip of the Furness peninsula, close to the Lake District, it is bordered by Morecambe Bay, the Duddon Estuary and the Irish Sea. In 2011, Barrow's population was 57,000, making it the second largest urban area in Cumbria after Carlisle, although it is geographically closer to the whole of Lancashire and most of Merseyside. Natives of Barrow, as well as the local dialect, are known as Barrovian.

HMAS <i>Sydney</i> (R17) Royal Australian Navy Majestic-class aircraft carrier

HMAS Sydney (R17/A214/P214/L134) was a Majestic-class light aircraft carrier operated by the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). She was built for the Royal Navy and was launched as HMS Terrible (93) in 1944, but was not completed before the end of World War II. The carrier was sold to Australia in 1947, completed, and commissioned into the RAN as Sydney in 1948.

The carrier was 701 feet 5 inches (213.79 m) long, had a displacement of 15,740 tons, and could reach a speed of 24 knots (44 km/h; 28 mph). [2] The carrier's air group consisted of de Havilland Sea Venom fighter-bombers, Fairey Gannet anti-submarine strike aircraft, and Westland Wessex helicopters. [2] [4] Melbourne underwent her annual refit from 16 September 1963 to 20 January 1964, with command handed over to Captain John Robertson in early January. [5]

Displacement (ship) ships weight

The displacement or displacement tonnage of a ship is its weight based on the amount of water its hull displaces at varying loads. It is measured indirectly using Archimedes' principle by first calculating the volume of water displaced by the ship then converting that value into weight displaced. Traditionally, various measurement rules have been in use, giving various measures in long tons. Today, metric tonnes are more used.

de Havilland Sea Venom carrier-based fighter aircraft family

The de Havilland Sea Venom is a British postwar carrier-capable jet aircraft developed from the de Havilland Venom. It served with the Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm and with the Royal Australian Navy. The French Navy operated the Aquilon, a version of the Sea Venom FAW.20 licence-built by SNCASE (Sud-Est).

Fairey Gannet naval aircraft family

The Fairey Gannet is a British carrier-borne aircraft of the post-Second World War era developed for the Royal Navy's Fleet Air Arm (FAA) by the Fairey Aviation Company. It was a mid-wing monoplane with a tricycle undercarriage and a crew of three, and a double turboprop engine driving two contra-rotating propellers.

HMAS Voyager

HMAS Voyager was the first of three Australian-built Daring-class destroyers. [6] The first all-welded ship built in Australia, Voyager was laid down by Cockatoo Island Dockyard in Sydney on 10 October 1949, launched on 1 May 1952, and commissioned into the RAN on 12 February 1957. [6]

At 390 feet (120 m) in length, Voyager displaced 2,800 tons (standard), and had a maximum speed of 34.75 knots (64.36 km/h; 39.99 mph). [6] After returning to Australia in August 1963, after a deployment to the Far East Strategic Reserve, Voyager was sent to Williamstown Naval Dockyard for refitting. [6] Captain Duncan Stevens was appointed commanding officer at the end of that year. [6] The refit was completed in late January 1964. [6]


On 9 February 1964, both ships arrived at Jervis Bay for post-refit trials. [6] During the day of 10 February the ships operated independently, or exercised with the British submarine HMS Tabard. [6] That evening, while 20 nautical miles (37 km; 23 mi) south-east of Jervis Bay, Melbourne was performing night flying exercises, while Voyager was acting as the carrier's plane guard escort; tasked with rescuing the crew from any aircraft that crashed or ditched. [6] [7] This required Voyager to maintain a position astern of and to port of Melbourne at a distance of 1,500 to 2,000 yards (1,400 to 1,800 m). [8] As aircraft carriers head into the wind to provide maximum assistance for takeoffs, their course can vary widely and on short notice; bridge teams aboard escorting destroyers must thus remain alert at all times. [9]

During the early part of the evening, when both ships were manoeuvring together, Voyager had no difficulty maintaining her position. [8] After the series of course changes which began at 20:40, intended to reverse the courses of both ships onto a northerly heading of 020° for flight operations, Voyager ended up ahead and to starboard of Melbourne. [8] [10]

At 20:52, Voyager was ordered to resume her plane guard station. [11] Voyager acknowledged the order and began turning a minute later. [12] It was expected that Voyager would turn away from Melbourne, make a large circle, cross the carrier's stern, then advance towards Melbourne on her port side. [11] Voyager did turn to starboard, away from Melbourne, but then unexpectedly turned to port. [13] It was initially assumed by Melbourne's bridge crew that Voyager was "fishtailing", conducting a series of zig-zag turns to slow the ship before swinging behind Melbourne, but Voyager did not alter course again. [14]

On Voyager's bridge, the officer of the watch and the navigator had become distracted, and Stevens was reading navigational charts, impairing his night vision. [15] The port bridge lookout had come on duty while Voyager was turning to starboard, and raised the alarm when the swing back to port brought Melbourne back into view around 20:55. [15] Melbourne's navigation officer ordered the carrier's engines to half speed astern around the same time, which Captain Robertson increased to full astern a few seconds later. [14] At the same time, Stevens gave the order "Full ahead both engines. Hard a-starboard," before instructing the destroyer's quartermaster to announce that a collision was imminent. [14] Both ships' measures were too late; at 54 seconds from impact, the ships were less than 600 metres (2,000 ft) apart and in extremis –physically unable to alter their speed or course enough to avoid a collision. [16] [17]

HMAS Melbourne en route to Sydney, immediately after the collision. The damage to the bow can be seen. HMAS Melbourne damage.jpg
HMAS Melbourne en route to Sydney, immediately after the collision. The damage to the bow can be seen.

Melbourne struck Voyager at 20:56, with the carrier's bow cutting into the forward superstructure of the destroyer just aft of the bridge and operations room. [16] [18] The senior officers on the bridge were killed on impact. [19] The mass of the oncoming carrier rolled Voyager to starboard before cutting the ship in two, with the bow passing down Melbourne's port side, and the stern down the starboard. [20] [21] Voyager's forward boiler exploded, briefly starting a fire in the open wreckage of the carrier's bow before it was extinguished by seawater. [20] The destroyer's forward section sank in 10 minutes, due to the weight of the two 4.5-inch gun turrets. [22] The aft section did not begin sinking until half an hour after the collision, and did not completely submerge until 00:18. [23] In the messages that were sent immediately to the Fleet Headquarters in Sydney, Robertson underestimated the extent of the damage to Voyager [24] and as a result the Captain Cook Graving Dock at Garden Island was ordered to clear the troopship HMAS Sydney from the dock to make room for Voyager, and the salvage ship, HMAS Kimbla, began sailing south to tow the destroyer to Sydney. [25]

Melbourne launched her boats almost immediately after the collision to recover survivors, and the carrier's wardroom and C Hangar were prepared for casualties. [26] One cutter was able to rescue 40 people before beginning to take on water. The cutter was commanded by Leading Seaman M. A. W. Riseley, who rescued as many survivors as he could despite the weight limit of the rescue boat. [27] The admiral's barge was damaged by debris. [21] Eight helicopters were also launched, but it was then deemed too dangerous to have so many active in such a small area, and they were limited to two at a time. [28] Most of the sailors in the water were unable or unwilling to be rescued with the helicopters' winches, so the helicopters were reassigned to provide illumination of the site with their landing lights. [28] At 21:58, Melbourne was informed that five minesweepers (HMA Ships Snipe, Teal, Hawk, Ibis, and Curlew), two search-and-rescue (SAR) boats from HMAS Creswell (Air Nymph and Air Sprite), and helicopters from Naval Air Station Nowra, had been dispatched. [29] [30] The destroyer escort HMAS Stuart was also being prepared to sail. [25] Arriving just before 22:00, Air Nymph collected 34 survivors and attempted to transfer them to Melbourne, but swells pushed the boat up under the carrier's flight deck and damaged two communications aerials, and the SAR boat was sent back to Creswell to offload the survivors. [30] Another 36 were recovered by Air Sprite and transported ashore. [30] Sea searches continued until 12 February, and aircraft made occasional passes over the area until 14 February, looking for bodies. [31]

From the 314 personnel aboard Voyager at the time of the collision, 14 officers, 67 sailors, and one civilian dockyard worker were killed, including Stevens and all but two sailors of the bridge crew. [32] The majority of those killed had been in the forward section of Voyager when the collision occurred, off duty and relaxing or sleeping. [33] Only three bodies were recovered, one of them being that of Stevens. They were buried on 14 February, and the missing were declared dead on 17 February. [34] Memorial services were held around Australia on 21 February. [34] There were no casualties aboard Melbourne. [25]

Repairs and replacement

At 03:00, after the Voyager survivors were bedded down and the forward collision bulkheads had been inspected and shored up, Robertson handed command of the search operation to Stuart and began to make for Sydney. [35] Melbourne was docked at Cockatoo Island Dockyard for repairs to her bow, which were completed by May 1964. [36] She remained in service with the RAN until 1982, and was sold for scrap to China in 1985. [37]

Following the collision, both the United Kingdom and the United States of America offered to loan ships to the RAN as a replacement; the Royal Navy offered Daring class destroyer HMS Duchess, while the United States Navy offered two Fletcher-class destroyers: USS The Sullivans and USS Twining. [36] Duchess was accepted and modernised, and as she was only intended to be in RAN service for four years (although she was later sold to the RAN and served until 1977), the RAN ordered the construction of two improved River-classdestroyer escorts (British Type 12 frigates), based on the Leander-class frigate design. [38] Swan and Torrens entered service in 1970 and 1971 respectively. [39]


First Royal Commission

Although a naval Board of Inquiry was suggested by senior RAN officers as the best way to investigate the incident, a series of incidents and accidents during the 1950s and early 1960s had left the general public with a mistrust of navy-run investigations, and Prime Minister Robert Menzies made it clear that an inquiry supervised by a federal judge would be the only acceptable route: anything else would be seen as a cover up. [40] Regulations for such an externally supervised inquiry were supposed to have been drafted following an explosion aboard HMAS Tarakan in 1950, but they were never enacted, so Menzies' only option was to call for a Royal Commission. [41] The commission, to be headed by Sir John Spicer, was announced by Menzies on 13 February 1964. [42] This commission was directed primarily to investigate the immediate causes of the collision, and the circumstances which led up to it. Secondary considerations included the suitability of both ships for the exercise, and the rescue and treatment of survivors. [42] These instructions were prepared without the consultation of the RAN. [42] The high number of competing arguments slowed the investigation, and it was not until 25 June that the inquiry was ended and the report begun. [43] The Spicer Report was released publicly on 26 August 1964. [44]

The report was considered to be of poor quality. It had a disjointed narrative and repeatedly failed to cite the relevant evidence. [45] In it, Spicer concluded that the collision was primarily the fault of Voyager's bridge crew, in that they neglected to maintain an effective lookout and lost awareness of the carrier's location, although he did not blame individual officers. [46] When reporting on the contribution of Melbourne and those aboard her to the collision, Spicer specifically indicated failures of Robertson and two other bridge officers, as they did not alert Voyager to the danger she was in, and appeared to not take measures to prevent Melbourne from colliding. [47] Robertson was marked for transfer to HMAS Watson, a training base in Sydney, and the admirals of the RAN decided to prevent Robertson from serving on Melbourne or any other seagoing vessel in the future. [48] Robertson submitted his resignation from the Navy on 10 September 1964, two days after receiving official notice of his new posting, which he saw as a demotion. [49] The media considered that Robertson had been made a scapegoat for the incident. [50]

Second Royal Commission

Over the next few years there was increasing pressure from the public, the media, and politicians of the government and opposition over the handling of the first Royal Commission, as well as claims made by Lieutenant Commander Peter Cabban, the former executive officer of Voyager, that Captain Stevens frequently drank to excess and was unfit for command. [51] [52] On 18 May 1967, Prime Minister Harold Holt announced a second Royal Commission into the Melbourne-Voyager collision, with Sir Stanley Burbury, [53] The Hon. Mr Justice Kenneth Asprey, [54] and the Hon. Mr Justice Geoffrey Lucas, [55] as presiding commissioners investigating the claims made by Cabban. [56] It was the only time in Australian history that two Royal Commissions have been held on the same incident, although it was emphasised that the second enquiry was to focus on Cabban's allegations, not the accident itself. [57] The commission opened on 13 June 1967, and hearings commenced on 18 July. [58]

The commission looked at the proposition that Stevens was unfit for command on the evening of the incident due to illness (a duodenal ulcer), drunkenness or a combination of the two, and that the description of the collision in Spicer's report and the conclusions drawn from it were inconsistent with events. [59] [60] Stevens' ulcer had previously hospitalised him, and he had concealed its recurrence from the RAN. [61] There was evidence that Stevens had been served a triple brandy earlier in the night, and a post-mortem conducted on Stevens' body showed a blood alcohol level of 0.025%, though the significance of this figure was challenged by expert witnesses. [61] [62] The hearings lasted 85 days, and the Burbury Report was released publicly on 25 February 1968. [63] It found that Stevens was medically unfit for command, although not impaired by alcohol at the time of the collision. [61] [64] Consequently, some of the findings of the first commission— those based on the assumption that Voyager was under appropriate command—required reevaluation. [61] [64] Robertson and the other officers of Melbourne were absolved of blame for the incident. [65]

Additional evidence

On condition of anonymity, a doctor informed the first Royal Commission that he had been confidentially prescribing amphetamine to Captain Stevens prior to the collision. [66] [ page needed ] This was a legal drug at the time and was carried in RAN ships' medical lockers. [67] Navy Minister Don Chipp has suggested this as an explanation for the contradictory impressions created in the minds of witnesses who reported on Captain Stevens' apparent state of health and demeanour prior to the collision. This evidence was only made public after both enquiries were completed. [68]


While the inattentiveness of the lookouts and bridge crew was a contributing factor to the collision, the exact cause has been difficult to determine, because all but one sailor from the bridge of Voyager were killed. [10] [69] In the immediate aftermath of the collision, five possible causes were put forward: [70]

  1. communications between the two vessels did not reflect the ships' intentions,
  2. those aboard Voyager had an incorrect idea of where they were in relation to Melbourne,
  3. the sea room required for the destroyer to manoeuvre was miscalculated,
  4. the level of training aboard one or both ships was deficient, or
  5. an equipment failure occurred aboard one or both ships.

The equipment failure, inadequate training, and miscalculated sea room theories were disproven by the two Royal Commissions, leaving the suggestion that either a communication error aboard one of the ships caused Voyager to manoeuvre in an undesired manner, or the officers aboard Voyager were incorrectly aware of their vessel's position in relation to the much larger aircraft carrier. [69]

Naval historian and ex-RAN officer Tom Frame, who studied the collision for his doctoral thesis, believes that the main cause of the collision was an error in communications: specifically that the instruction to turn to 020° and then assume the plane guard station was garbled on receipt by Voyager. [71] The signal was "Foxtrot Corpen 020 22", meaning that Melbourne was about to commence flying operations on a heading of 020°, at a speed of 22 knots (41 km/h; 25 mph), and that Voyager was to assume the plane guard station. [72] [73] While the first Royal Commission considered the likelihood that the code phrase "foxtrot corpen" was reversed to become "corpen foxtrot" (an order to turn onto the given course), Frame states that it was more likely that the numbers given for the course were misheard or confused with other numbers in the signal as a turn to the south-west (various possibilities offered by Frame would have indicated a turn to the south-west instead of the north-east, with an incorrect heading between 200° and 220°, or of 270°), or that this happened in conjunction with the code phrase error. [72] [74] Former RAN Commodore David Ferry disagrees with Frame's conclusions, claiming that the coincidence of two errors in the same signal was unlikely, and that either error would be sufficient cause for Stevens or the other officers to query the signal. [75]

The idea that those aboard Voyager incorrectly assessed their position in relation to the carrier was most prominently supported by Robertson during the first commission: he suggested that Stevens and the others aboard the destroyer may have believed that they were on Melbourne's port bow. [76] The navigational lights aboard Melbourne may have been dimmed (there is disagreement on this point), and experimental red floodlights on the flight deck may have been seen and misinterpreted as a port-side navigation light. [77] [78] [79] The second Royal Commission felt that this, combined with the ill health of Stevens, was the more likely cause of the collision. [10] Frame states that for this theory to be plausible, the entire bridge crew had to lose the tactical picture at the same time, which he considered to be too improbable. [80] Ferry is also of the opinion that, unless Melbourne was both in Voyager's radar blind spot and obscured by exhaust from the destroyer, it was unlikely that the bridge crew would think they were not to starboard of the carrier. [81]

Ferry favours the opinion that Voyager misjudged the manoeuvring room she had. [82] He claims that the destroyer knew where she was in relation to Melbourne and that the turn to starboard then reversal to port was intended to be a "fishtail" manoeuvre. Voyager was to swing out wide of the carrier, then turn back towards her, cross the stern and assume her position without having to do a loop. [82] However, insufficient time was allowed for Voyager to get clear of Melbourne before turning back to port, so instead of passing behind Melbourne, the destroyer passed in front. [83] Ferry's theory eliminates the need for a double error in the communications signals, and the need for all on the destroyer's bridge to have such a vastly incorrect assumption of where Voyager was in relation to the carrier. [61] In 2014 he wrote a summary of the theories, the suitability of Royal Commissions for this type of investigation and related experience from the later HMAS Melbourne/USS Frank E. Evans collision. [84]

In 2015 Elizabeth McCarthy asserted in her book John Jess Seeker of Justice, the Role of the Parliament in the HMAS Voyager Tragedy that the crew of HMAS Voyager and HMAS Melbourne did their jobs correctly, and did not make an error on the night of the collision. The crew of the Voyager were in fact watching Melbourne and did receive and pass on the signals correctly. This was proven by selected transcripts being included in the book from the publication prohibited pages of the Royal Commission in 1964. McCarthy also supports the view put forward by the Burbury Report in 1968 that the final order received by Voyager which Voyager acted on, was likely countermanded by Captain Stevens, which put Voyager in the path of Melbourne and collision stations, and that this was a result of his ill health at the time of the collision. An analysis of his last actions and movements in her book does suggest he was unwell and possibly in pain from a reactivated duodenal ulcer. Her book also puts forward the view that Captain Stevens ill health was known by 75% of those conducting the Royal Commission in 1964. The treatment of the naval personnel at this Commission was described by John Jess as "The greatest injustice carried out in Australian service history." [85]


Awards and honours

Chief Petty Officer Jonathan Rogers was posthumously awarded the George Cross for his actions during the sinking. [28] Recognising that he was too large to fit through the escape hatch, he organised the evacuation of those who could escape, then led those stuck in the compartment in prayers and hymns as they died. [28] Posthumous Albert Medals for Lifesaving were awarded to Midshipman Kerry Marien and Electrical Mechanic William Condon for their actions in saving other Voyager personnel at the cost of their own lives. [86] [87] The awards were listed in the 19 March 1965 issue of the London Gazette, along with one George Medal, five British Empire Medals for Gallantry, and three Queen's Commendations for Brave Conduct for Voyager personnel. [87]

On 4 December 2015, it was announced that the support centre for the Canberra-class amphibious assault ships would be named after Robertson. [88] Robertson's family and the RSL have called for a formal apology from the Australian government instead, but several government figures have stated that the naming of the centre is a "fitting acknowledgement" of Robertson's career. [88]

Changes to RAN procedures

Following the investigation, changes were made within the RAN to prevent a similar occurrence. [89] Procedures were created for challenging another ship that was seen to be manoeuvring dangerously, or which had transmitted an unclear manoeuvring signal, [89] and rules for escort vessels operating with Melbourne were compiled. Among other instructions, these rules banned escorts from approaching within 2,000 yards (1,800 m) of the carrier unless specifically instructed to, and stated that any manoeuvre around Melbourne was to commence with a turn away from the carrier. The new rules were applied to all ships scheduled to sail in concert with the carrier, including those of foreign navies. [89] [90]

Compensation claims

Families of those killed in the sinking of Voyager attempted to claim compensation for their losses, while survivors tried to make claims for post-traumatic stress and similar ailments. [91] A 1965 High Court ruling prevented armed-forces personnel from suing the government for compensation, although the wife of the dockyard worker killed in the collision was able to make a successful claim. [92] [93] The ruling was overturned in 1982. [92] [94] Cases for compensation were lodged by Voyager survivors and their families, and during the 1990s, sailors from Melbourne began to make similar legal claims. [92] [95] [96]

Both groups were met with heavy legal opposition from the Australian government, with Commonwealth representatives contending that those making claims were opportunistically trying to blame a single incident for a range of life problems and had fabricated or embellished their symptoms, or were otherwise making not credible claims. [91] [97] In 2007 Peter Covington-Thomas was awarded $2 million in compensation. [98] [99] By May 2008, 35 cases were still ongoing, two from dependants of Voyager sailors killed in the collision, the remainder from Melbourne sailors. [91] A further 50 cases had been closed in 2007 following mediation. [91] A further group of 214 compensation cases related to the incident was closed in July 2009. [100] Some cases had been open for more than ten years, costing the government millions of dollars a year in legal costs. [91]

In 2008, the handling of some Voyager survivors' cases was investigated by the Law Institute of Victoria, after they made complaints about the discrepancies between what they were awarded and what was received: for example, one sailor only received $72,000 from a $412,000 settlement. [101] All of the complaints were from cases handled by David Forster of Hollows Lawyers, who handled 89 of the 214 total cases; these resulted in a total settlement of $23 million. [92] [101] Investigations found major accounting issues, including apparent double-charging for work done, and charging full fees after they were discounted or completely written off. [92] [101] In 2010, receivers were called in; this was followed by the cancellation of Forster's law practising certificate in December 2011. [92] [101] In 2014 the High Court dismissed Forster's challenges to the appointment of receivers, [102] and the refusal to issue him with a practising certificate. [103] In 2017 the Supreme Court authorised the distribution of $1.8 million to Forster's former clients. [104] [105]

See also


  1. Sir John Spicer was the Chief Judge of the Commonwealth Industrial Court.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Sea Power Centre, HMAS Melbourne (II).
  3. 1 2 Hobbs, HMAS Melbourne (II) – 25 Years On, p. 5.
  4. 1 2 Hobbs, HMAS Melbourne (II) – 25 Years On, p. 6.
  5. Frame, Where Fate Calls, pp. 8, 10.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Sea Power Centre, HMAS Voyager (II).
  7. Hall, HMAS Melbourne, p. 123.
  8. 1 2 3 Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 11.
  9. Hall, HMAS Melbourne, pp. 123-4.
  10. 1 2 3 Ferry, What caused the Voyager collision?, p. 5.
  11. 1 2 Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 12.
  12. Frame, Where Fate Calls, p. 23.
  13. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 121.
  14. 1 2 3 Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 13.
  15. 1 2 Hall, HMAS Melbourne, pp. 125-6.
  16. 1 2 Frame, The Cruel Legacy, pp. 14-15.
  17. Hall, HMAS Melbourne, pp. 126–27.
  18. Hall, HMAS Melbourne, p. 127.
  19. Hall, HMAS Melbourne, pp. 127-8.
  20. 1 2 Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 1.
  21. 1 2 Hall, HMAS Melbourne, p. 128.
  22. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 2.
  23. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, pp. 3-7.
  24. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 5.
  25. 1 2 3 Frame, Where Fate Calls, p. 27.
  26. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 4.
  27. Spicer (1964), p. 33.
  28. 1 2 3 4 Hall, HMAS Melbourne, p. 129.
  29. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, pp. 5-6.
  30. 1 2 3 McNicoll, Forgotten saviours.
  31. Frame, Where Fate Calls, p. 31.
  32. Frame, Where Fate Calls, p. 72.
  33. Frame, Where Fate Calls, pp. 25-6.
  34. 1 2 Frame, Where Fate Calls, p. 33.
  35. Hall, HMAS Melbourne, pp. 130-31.
  36. 1 2 Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 21.
  37. Hobbs, HMAS Melbourne (II) – 25 Years On, p. 9.
  38. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, pp. 21-22.
  39. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 22.
  40. Frame, Where Fate Calls, pp. 43-5.
  41. Frame, Where Fate Calls, pp. 44-6.
  42. 1 2 3 Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 27.
  43. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, pp. 53-64.
  44. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 67.
  45. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 68.
  46. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 69.
  47. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, pp. 67-8.
  48. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 78.
  49. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, pp. 78-9, 82.
  50. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 82.
  51. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 88.
  52. Cooper, The Era of Forward Defence, p. 202.
  53. Sir Stanley Burbury was the Chief Justice of Tasmania.
  54. The Hon. Mr Justice Kenneth Asprey was a judge of the New South Wales Court of Appeal.
  55. The Hon. Mr Justice Geoffrey Lucas was a judge of the Supreme Court of Queensland.
  56. Frame, 2005, The Cruel Legacy, pp. 114–5.
  57. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 117.
  58. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, pp. 117-8.
  59. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 144-5.
  60. Donnelly, Political fallout for years after tragedy of Voyager.
  61. 1 2 3 4 5 Ferry, What caused the Voyager collision?, p. 12.
  62. Frame, Where Fate Calls, p. 256.
  63. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, pp. 149, 157.
  64. 1 2 Frame, The Cruel Legacy, pp. 159-60.
  65. Frame, The Cruel Legacy, p. 160.
  66. Chipp & Larkin, The Third Man.
  67. Frame, Where Fate Calls, pp. 265–6.
  68. Frame, Where Fate Calls, p. 265.
  69. 1 2 Frame, Where Fate Calls, p. 310.
  70. Frame, Where Fate Calls, pp. x–ix, 310.
  71. Frame, Where Fate Calls, pp. 310–11.
  72. 1 2 Frame, Where Fate Calls, pp. 313–21.
  73. Oxenbould, The Sinking of HMAS Voyager, p. 106.
  74. Ferry, What caused the Voyager collision?, p. 7.
  75. Ferry, What caused the Voyager collision?, p. 8.
  76. Frame, Where Fate Calls, pp. 310–13.
  77. Frame, Where Fate Calls, pp. 311–12.
  78. Ferry, What caused the Voyager collision?, pp. 8-9.
  79. Oxenbould, The Sinking of HMAS Voyager, pp. 105–6.
  80. Frame, Where Fate Calls, p. 312.
  81. Ferry, What caused the Voyager collision?, pp. 9-10.
  82. 1 2 Ferry, What caused the Voyager collision?, pp. 10-12.
  83. Ferry, What caused the Voyager collision?, p. 11.
  84. Ferry, D S. "HMAS Melbournen/Voyager Collision: Cause Theories and Inquiries (with aspects of the HMAS Melbourne/USS Frank E Evans collision)" (PDF). Headmark. March, 2014 Issue 151: 2–17.
  85. McCarthy, Elizabeth (2015). John Jess Seeker of Justice the Role of the Parliament in the HMAS Voyager Tragedy. Melbourne: Sid Harta. ISBN   978-1-925230-88-8.[ page needed ]
  86. Cooper, The Era of Forward Defence, p. 201.
  87. 1 2 "No. 43604". The London Gazette . 19 March 1965. p. 2797.
  88. 1 2 McPhedran, Ian (4 December 2014). "Formal apology long overdue for navy hero Captain John Robertson". The Advertiser. Retrieved 7 December 2015.
  89. 1 2 3 Oxenbould, The Sinking of HMAS Voyager, p. 109.
  90. Frame, Where Fate Calls, p. 331.
  91. 1 2 3 4 5 Berkovic, Lawyers still battling over Voyager.
  92. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ackland, Voyager survivors' compensation all at sea.
  93. Parker v Commonwealth [1965] HCA 12 , (1965) 112 CLR 295 at pp 301-2, High Court
  94. Groves v Commonwealth [1982] HCA 21 , (1982) 150 CLR 113 at pp 118-9, 133-4, 136, 137, High Court
  95. Freckelton, HMAS Melbourne and HMAS Voyager, p. 368.
  96. Commonwealth v Verwayen (Voyager case) [1990] HCA 39 , (1990) 170 CLR 394, High Court.
  97. Freckelton, HMAS Melbourne and HMAS Voyager, pp. 368-9, 372.
  98. Covington-Thomas v Commonwealth of Australia [2007] NSWSC 779 , Supreme Court (NSW).
  99. "Long fight for Voyager survivors". TheAustrralian. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
  100. Strong, Last HMAS Voyager claim settled, 45 years on.
  101. 1 2 3 4 Petrie, Voyager solicitor 'overbilled millions'.
  102. Forster v Legal Services Board [2014] HCASL 4.
  103. Forster v Legal Services Board [2014] HCASL 20.
  104. Legal Services Board v Forster [2017] VSC 279 , Supreme Court (Vic).
  105. "Legal wrangle following Melbourne-Voyager disaster finally over for Bendigo woman". Bendigo Advertiser. 4 August 2017. Retrieved 4 November 2018.

Related Research Articles

HMAS <i>Duchess</i> (D154)

HMAS Duchess was a Daring-class destroyer that served in the Royal Navy as HMS Duchess from 1952 to 1964, and in the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) from 1964 to 1980. She was laid down by John I. Thornycroft and Company, and commissioned into the Royal Navy in 1952.

<i>Daring</i>-class destroyer (1949) 1952 class of destroyers of the Royal and Royal Australian navies

The Daring class was a class of eleven destroyers built for the Royal Navy (RN) and Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Constructed after World War II, and entering service during the 1950s, eight ships were constructed for the RN, and three ships for the RAN. Two of the RN destroyers were subsequently sold to and served in the Peruvian Navy (MGP). A further eight ships were planned for the RN but were cancelled before construction commenced, while a fourth RAN vessel was begun but was cancelled before launch and broken up on the slipway.

HMAS <i>Anzac</i> (D59)

HMAS Anzac (D59) was a Battle-class destroyer of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Named after the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps, the destroyer was commissioned in 1951. The ship served on two tours of duty during the Korean War, and attempts to distinguish herself from British ships led to the practice of red kangaroo symbols on Australian warships. During 1956, Anzac served during the Malayan Emergency. In 1960, a malfunction in the destroyer's gun direction equipment caused Anzac to fire directly on sister ship HMAS Tobruk during a gunnery exercise, with Tobruk left unrepairable. In 1961, the destroyer was reclassified as a training vessel. Anzac remained in service until 1974, and was sold for breaking a year later.

HMAS <i>Vampire</i> (D11) 1959-1986 Daring-class destroyer of the Royal Australian Navy

HMAS Vampire was the third of three Australian-built Daring class destroyers serving in the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). One of the first all-welded ships built in Australia, she was constructed at Cockatoo Island Dockyard between 1952 and 1959, and was commissioned into the RAN a day after completion.

The battle between the Australian light cruiser HMAS Sydney and the German auxiliary cruiser Kormoran was a single ship action that occurred on 19 November 1941, off the coast of Western Australia. Sydney, with Captain Joseph Burnett commanding, and Kormoran, under Fregattenkapitän (Commander) Theodor Detmers, encountered each other approximately 106 nautical miles off Dirk Hartog Island. Both ships were destroyed in the half-hour engagement.

Hector Waller Royal Australian Navy captain

Hector Macdonald Laws (Hec) Waller, was a senior officer in the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). His career spanned almost thirty years, including service in both world wars. At the helm of HMAS Stuart in the Mediterranean from 1939 to 1941, he won recognition as a skilful ship's captain and flotilla commander. He then transferred to the South West Pacific as captain of the light cruiser HMAS Perth, and went down with his ship against heavy odds during the Battle of Sunda Strait in early 1942.

HMAS <i>Voyager</i> (D31) W class destroyer of the Royal Navy

HMAS Voyager (D31/I31) was a W class destroyer of the Royal Navy (RN) and Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Commissioned into the RN in 1918, the destroyer remained in RN service until 1933, when she was transferred to the RAN. Recommissioned, Voyager served in the Mediterranean and Pacific theatres of World War II until 23 September 1942, when she ran aground while trying to deliver troops to Timor. The ship was damaged by Japanese bombers while trying to refloat, then was scuttled by her crew.

HMAS Vendetta was one of three Daring class destroyers built for and operated by the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). The destroyer was built by Williamstown Naval Dockyard and entered service in 1958. During her early career, Vendetta was deployed to the Far East Strategic Reserve on multiple occasions. In 1965 and 1966, the destroyer undertook deterrence patrols during the Indonesia-Malaysia Confrontation. Along with several runs escorting the troop transport HMAS Sydney to Vietnam, from late 1969 to early 1970 Vendetta was assigned to combat operations, and became the only Australian-built warship to serve in a shore bombardment role during the Vietnam War.

HMAS <i>Torrens</i> (DE 53)

HMAS Torrens was a River class destroyer escort of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Torrens entered service in 1971, and was active until her decommissioning in 1998.

HMAS <i>Westralia</i> (F95)

HMAS Westralia (F95/C61) was an auxiliary cruiser of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Built by Scottish shipbuilder Harland and Wolff and completed in 1929, Westralia was operated by the Huddart Parker company until 1939, when she was requisitioned for service with the RAN as an Armed Merchant Cruiser (AMC). Fitted with guns and commissioned in early 1940, Westralia was initially used to escort convoys in the Pacific and Indian oceans. In November 1940, the largest mutiny in RAN history occurred aboard the ship, with 104 men charged.

History of the Royal Australian Navy

The history of the Royal Australian Navy traces the development of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) from the colonisation of Australia by the British in 1788. Until 1859, vessels of the Royal Navy made frequent trips to the new colonies. In 1859, the Australia Squadron was formed as a separate squadron and remained in Australia until 1913. Until Federation, five of the six Australian colonies operated their own colonial naval force, which formed on 1 March 1901 the Australian Navy's (AN) Commonwealth Naval Force which received Royal patronage in July 1911 and was from that time referred to as Royal Australian Navy (RAN). On 4 October 1913 the new replacement fleet for the foundation fleet of 1901 steamed through Sydney Heads for the first time.

HMAS <i>Parramatta</i> (U44)

HMAS Parramatta (U44) was a Grimsby class sloop of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Built during the late 1930s, Parramatta operated in the Red Sea and Mediterranean during World War II. The sloop was torpedoed by the German submarine U-559 on 27 November 1941, and sank with 138 of the 162 aboard.

Thomas Robert "Tom" Frame is an Australian Anglican bishop, historian, academic, author and social commentator.

<i>Melbourne</i>–<i>Evans</i> collision

The MelbourneEvans collision was a collision between the light aircraft carrier HMAS Melbourne of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) and the destroyer USS Frank E. Evans of the United States Navy (USN). On 3 June 1969, the two ships were participating in SEATO exercise Sea Spirit in the South China Sea. Around 3:00 am, when ordered to a new escort station, Evans sailed under Melbourne's bow, where she was cut in two. Seventy-four of Evans' crew were killed.

Otto Becher senior officer in the Royal Australian Navy

Rear Admiral Otto Humphrey Becher, & Bar was a senior officer in the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Born in Harvey, Western Australia, Becher entered the Royal Australian Naval College in 1922. After graduating in 1926, he was posted to a series of staff and training positions prior to specialising in gunnery.

Henry Burrell (admiral) Royal Australian Navy chief

Vice Admiral Sir Henry Mackay Burrell, was a senior commander in the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). He served as Chief of the Naval Staff (CNS) from 1959 to 1962. Born in the Blue Mountains, Burrell entered the Royal Australian Naval College in 1918 as a thirteen-year-old cadet. His first posting at sea was aboard the cruiser HMAS Sydney. During the 1920s and 1930s, Burrell served for several years on exchange with the Royal Navy, specialising as a navigator. Following the outbreak of World War II, he filled a key liaison post with the US Navy, and later saw action as commander of the destroyer HMAS Norman, earning a mention in despatches.


Royal Commission reports

Spicer, Sir John Armstrong (1964). Report of Royal Commissioner on loss of H.M.A.S. "Voyager" (Report). Melbourne: A.J. Arthur, Commonwealth Govt. Printer. Retrieved 2 February 2018.

Burbury; Asprey & Lucas (1 March 1968). "Royal Commissioners' Report on Voyager Inquiry" (PDF). Navy News. 11 (5). Parramatta: Cumberland Newspapers Pty Ltd. Retrieved 2 February 2018.

Journal and news articles

Further reading