Nathaniel P. Banks

Last updated

Nathaniel P. Banks
Nathaniel Prentice Banks - Brady-Handy (1).jpg
Portrait by Brady-Handy studio, c. 1865–1880
24th Governor of Massachusetts
In office
January 7, 1858 January 3, 1861
Spouse
Mary Theodosia Palmer
(m. 1847)
Children4, including Maude Banks
Profession Military officer, workman
Signature Nathaniel P. Banks signature.png
Military service
Allegiance
Branch/service
Years of service18611865
Rank Union Army major general rank insignia.svg Major General
Commands
Battles/wars American Civil War

Nathaniel Prentice (or Prentiss) [1] Banks (January 30, 1816 – September 1, 1894) was an American politician from Massachusetts and a Union general during the Civil War. A millworker by background, Banks became prominent in local debating societies. He entered politics as a young adult. Initially a member of the Democratic Party, Banks's abolitionist views drew him to the nascent Republican Party, through which he won election to the United States House of Representatives and as Governor of Massachusetts in the 1850s. At the start of the 34th Congress, he was elected Speaker of the House in an election that spanned a record 133 ballots taken over the course of two months.

Contents

At the outbreak of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln appointed Banks as one of the first political major generals, over the heads of West Point regulars, who initially resented him, but came to acknowledge his influence on the administration of the war. After suffering a series of inglorious setbacks in the Shenandoah River Valley at the hands of Stonewall Jackson, Banks replaced Benjamin Butler at New Orleans as commander of the Department of the Gulf, charged with the administration of Louisiana and gaining control of the Mississippi River. He failed to reinforce Grant at Vicksburg, and badly handled the Siege of Port Hudson, taking its surrender only after Vicksburg had fallen. He then launched the Red River Campaign, a failed attempt to occupy northern Louisiana and eastern Texas that prompted his recall. Banks was regularly criticized for the failures of his campaigns, notably in tactically important tasks, including reconnaissance. Banks was also instrumental in early reconstruction efforts in Louisiana, intended by Lincoln as a model for later such activities.

After the war, Banks returned to the Massachusetts political scene, serving in Congress, where he supported Manifest Destiny, influenced the Alaska Purchase legislation, and supported women's suffrage. In his later years, he adopted more liberal progressive causes, and served as a United States marshal for Massachusetts before suffering a decline in his mental faculties.

Early life

Major General Nathaniel Prentiss Banks of General Staff U.S. Volunteers Infantry Regiment in uniform, with his wife, Mary Theodosia Palmer Banks. From the Liljenquist Family Collection of Civil War Photographs, Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress Major General Nathaniel Prentiss Banks of General Staff U.S. Volunteers Infantry Regiment in uniform, with his wife Mary Theodosia Palmer Banks, who holds an open book) - Henry F. Warren, LCCN2017659650.jpg
Major General Nathaniel Prentiss Banks of General Staff U.S. Volunteers Infantry Regiment in uniform, with his wife, Mary Theodosia Palmer Banks. From the Liljenquist Family Collection of Civil War Photographs, Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress

Nathaniel Prentice Banks was born at Waltham, Massachusetts, the first child of Nathaniel P. Banks Sr. and Rebecca Greenwood Banks, on January 30, 1816. His father worked in the textile mill of the Boston Manufacturing Company, eventually becoming a foreman. [2] Banks went to local schools until the age of fourteen, at which point the family's financial demands compelled him to take a mill job. He started as a bobbin boy, responsible for replacing bobbins full of thread with empty ones, [3] working in the mills of Waltham and Lowell. [4] Because of this role he became known as Bobbin Boy Banks, a nickname he carried throughout his life. [5] He was at one time apprenticed as a mechanic alongside Elias Howe, a cousin who later had the first patent for a sewing machine with a lockstitch design. [6]

Recognizing the value of education, Banks continued to read, sometimes walking to Boston on his days off to visit the Atheneum Library. He attended company-sponsored lectures by luminaries of the day including Daniel Webster and other orators. He formed a debate club with other mill workers to improve their oratorical skills, and took up acting. He became involved in the local temperance movement; speaking at its events brought him to the attention of Democratic Party leaders, who asked him to speak at campaign events during the 1840 elections. He honed his oratorical and political skills by emulating Robert Rantoul Jr., a Democratic Congressman who also had humble beginnings. [7] His personal good looks, voice, and flair for presentation were all assets that he used to gain advantage in the political sphere, and he deliberately sought to present himself with a more aristocratic bearing than was suggested by his humble beginnings. [8]

Banks's success as a speaker convinced him to quit the mill. He first worked as an editor for two short-lived political newspapers; after they failed he ran for a seat in the state legislature in 1844, but lost. He then applied for a job to Rantoul, who had been appointed Collector of the Port of Boston, a patronage position. [9] Banks's job, which he held until political changes forced him out in 1849, [10] gave him sufficient security that he was able to marry Mary Theodosia Palmer, an ex-factory employee he had been courting for some time. [11] Banks again ran for the state legislature in 1847, but was unsuccessful. [12]

Antebellum political career

Banks in 1852, portrait by Southworth and Hawes Nathaniel Prentice Banks - Southworth and Hawes.jpg
Banks in 1852, portrait by Southworth and Hawes

In 1848, Banks was victorious in another run for the state legislature, successfully organizing elements in Waltham whose votes were not easily controlled by the Whig-controlled Boston Manufacturing Company. Company leaders could effectively compel their workers to vote for Whig candidates because there was no secret ballot. [13] He was at first moderate in opposition to the expansion of slavery, but recognizing the potency of the burgeoning abolitionist movement, he became more strongly attached to that cause as a vehicle for political advancement. [14] This brought Banks, along with fellow Democrats Rantoul and George S. Boutwell to form a coalition with the Free Soil Party that successfully gained control of the legislature and governor's chair. The deals negotiated after the coalition win in the 1850 election put Boutwell in the governor's chair and made Banks the Speaker of the Massachusetts House of Representatives. Although Banks did not like the radical Free Soiler Charles Sumner (either personally or for his strongly abolitionist politics), he supported the coalition agreement that resulted in Sumner's election to the United States Senate, despite opposition from conservative Democrats. His role as house speaker and his effectiveness in conducting business raised his status significantly, [15] as did his publicity work for the state Board of Education. [16]

Congress

In 1852, Banks sought the Democratic nomination for a seat in the United States Congress. While it was at first granted, his refusal to disavow abolitionist positions meant support was withdrawn by party conservatives. He ended up winning a narrow victory anyway, with Free Soil support. [17] In 1853, he presided over the state Constitutional Convention of 1853. This convention produced a series of proposals for constitutional reform, including a new constitution, all of which were rejected by voters. The failure, which was led by Whigs and conservative anti-abolitionist Democrats, spelled the end of the Democratic-Free Soil coalition. [18]

In Congress, Banks sat on the Committee of Military Affairs. He bucked the Democratic party line by voting against the Kansas–Nebraska Act, which overturned the 1820 Missouri Compromise, using his parliamentary skills in an effort to keep the bill from coming to a vote. [19] Supported by his constituents, he then publicly endorsed the abolitionist cause. [20] His opposition came despite long stated support for Manifest Destiny (the idea that the United States was destined to rule the North American continent), which the bill's proponents claimed it furthered. [21] In 1854, he formally joined the so-called Know Nothing cause, a secretive populist and anti-immigration nativist movement – officially named American Party since 1855. He was renominated for Congress by the Democrats and Free Soilers, and won an easy victory in that year's Know Nothing landslide victory. [22] Banks was, along with Henry Wilson and Governor Henry J. Gardner, considered one of the political leaders of the Know Nothing movement, although none of the three supported its extreme anti-immigrant positions of many of its supporters. [23]

In 1855, Banks agreed to chair the convention of a new Republican Party convention, whose platform was intended to bring together antislavery interests from the Democrats, Whigs, Free Soilers, and Know Nothings. When Know Nothing Governor Henry Gardner refused to join in the fusion, Banks carefully kept his options open, passively supporting the Republican effort but also avoiding criticism of Gardner in his speeches. Gardner was reelected. [24] During the summer of 1855, Banks was invited to speak at an antislavery rally in Portland, Maine, his first major speaking opportunity outside Massachusetts. In the speech, Banks expressed his opinion that the Union did not necessarily need to be preserved, say that under certain conditions it would be appropriate to "let [the Union] slide". Future political opponents would repeatedly use these words against him, accusing him of "disunionism". [25]

At the opening of the 34th U.S. Congress in December 1855, after the Democrats had lost their majority and only made up 35% of the House, representatives from several parties opposed to slavery's spread gradually united in supporting the Know Nothing Banks for Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives. After the longest speakership contests on record, lasting from December 3, 1855, to February 2, 1856, Banks was chosen on the 133rd ballot, receiving 103 votes out of 214 cast, or five less than an absolute majority. [26] The coalition supporting him was formed by his American Party (known as the Know Nothing Party) and the Opposition Party, which opposed the Democrats, marking the first form of a coalition in congressional history. This victory was lauded at the time as the "first Republican victory" and "first Northern victory" – although Banks is officially affiliated as Speaker from the American Party – and greatly raised Banks's national profile. [27] He gave antislavery men important posts in Congress for the first time, and cooperated with investigations of both the Kansas conflict and the caning of Charles Sumner on the floor of the Senate. Because of his fairness in dealing with the numerous factions, as well his parliamentary ability, Banks was lauded by others in the body, including former Speaker Howell Cobb, who called him "in all respects the best presiding officer [I] had ever seen." [28]

Banks played a key role in 1856 in bringing forward John C. Frémont as a moderate Republican presidential nominee. Because of his success as speaker, Banks was considered a possible presidential contender, and his name was put in nomination by supporters (knowing that he supported Frémont) at the Know Nothing convention, held one week before the Republicans met. Banks then refused the Know Nothing nomination, which went instead to former President Millard Fillmore. Banks was active on the stump in support of Frémont, who lost the election to James Buchanan. Banks easily won reelection to his own seat, though Democrats regained control of the House of Representatives. [29] He was not re-nominated for speaker when the 35th Congress convened in December 1857.

Governor of Massachusetts

In 1857, Banks ran for Governor of Massachusetts against the incumbent Gardner. His nomination by the Republicans was contentious, with opposition coming primarily from radical abolitionist interests opposed to his comparatively moderate stand on the issue. After a contentious general election campaign Banks won a comfortable victory. [30] One key action Banks took in support of the antislavery movement was the dismissal of Judge Edward G. Loring. [31] Loring had ruled in 1854 that Anthony Burns, a fugitive slave, be returned to slavery under the terms of the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850. [32] Under the pressure of a public petition campaign spearheaded by William Lloyd Garrison, the legislature passed two Bills of Address, in 1855 and 1856, calling for Loring's removal from his state office, but in both cases Gardner had declined to remove him. Banks signed a third such bill in 1858. [31] He was rewarded with significant antislavery support, easily winning reelection in 1858. [33]

John Albion Andrew (portrait by Darius Cobb) succeeded Banks as governor. John Albion Andrew by Darius Cobb.jpg
John Albion Andrew (portrait by Darius Cobb) succeeded Banks as governor.

Banks's 1859 reelection was influenced by two significant issues. One was a state constitutional amendment requiring newly naturalized citizens to wait two years before becoming eligible to vote. Promoted by the state's Know Nothings, it was passed by referendum in May of that year. Banks, catering to Know Nothing supporters, supported its passage, although Republicans elsewhere opposed such measures, because they were seeking immigrant votes. [34] The amendment was repealed in 1863. [35] The other issue was John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry, which more radical Republicans (notably John Albion Andrew) supported. Not yet ready for armed conflict, the state voted for the more moderate Banks. [34] After the election, Banks vetoed a series of bills, over provisions removing a restriction limiting state militia participation to whites. This incensed the radical abolitionist forces in the legislature, but they were unable to override his vetoes in that year's session, or of similar bills passed in the next. [36]

Banks made a serious bid for the Republican presidential nomination in 1860, but dislike of him by the radicals in the state party harmed him. His failure to secure a majority in the state delegation prompted him to skip the national convention, [37] where he received first-ballot votes as a nominee for Vice President. [38] His attempt to promote Henry L. Dawes, another moderate Republican, as his successor in the governor's chair also failed: the party nominated the radical Andrew, who went on to win the general election. [39] Banks's farewell speech, given with civil war looming, was an appeal for moderation and union. [40]

During the summer of 1860, Banks accepted an offer to become a resident director of the Illinois Central Railroad, which had previously employed his mentor Robert Rantoul. [41] Banks moved to Chicago after leaving office, and was engaged primarily in the promotion and sale of the railroad's extensive lands. [42] He continued to speak out in Illinois against the breakup of the Union. [40]

Civil War

The champions of the Union, lithograph by Currier & Ives, 1861. Banks is among the frontmost standing figures, just left of the central seated figure, General Winfield Scott. Currier & Ives - The champions of the Union 1861.jpg
The champions of the Union, lithograph by Currier & Ives, 1861. Banks is among the frontmost standing figures, just left of the central seated figure, General Winfield Scott.

As the Civil War became imminent in early 1861, President Abraham Lincoln considered Banks for a cabinet post, [43] despite a negative recommendation from Governor Andrew, who considered Banks to be unsuitable for any office. [44] Lincoln rejected Banks in part because he had accepted the railroad job, [45] but chose him as one of the first major generals (Maj. Gen.) of volunteers, appointing him on May 16, 1861. [46] Many of the professional soldiers in the regular army were unhappy with this [47] but Banks, given his national prominence as a leading Republican, brought political benefits to the administration, including the ability to attract recruits and money for the Union cause, despite his lack of field experience. [48]

First command

Banks first commanded a military district in eastern Maryland, which notably included Baltimore, a hotbed of secessionist sentiment and a vital rail link. Banks for the most part stayed out of civil affairs, allowing political expression of secessionism to continue, while maintaining important rail connections between the north and Washington, DC. [49] He did, however arrest the police chief and commissioners of the city of Baltimore, and replaced the police force with one that had more carefully vetted pro-Union sympathies. [50] In August 1861, Banks was assigned to the western district of Maryland. There he was responsible for the arrest of legislators sympathetic to the Confederate cause (as was John Adams Dix, who succeeded Banks in the eastern district) in advance of legislative elections. This, combined with the release of local soldiers in his army to vote, ensured that the Maryland legislature remained pro-Union. [51] Banks's actions had a chilling effect on Confederate sentiment in Maryland. Although it was a slave state, it remained loyal through the war. [50]

Shenandoah Valley Campaign

Banks' headquarters in Winchester, Virginia, during the Civil War 230 West Boscawen Street.jpg
Banks' headquarters in Winchester, Virginia, during the Civil War

Banks's division technically belonged to George McClellan despite serving as an independent command in the Shenandoah Valley. On March 14, 1862, President Lincoln issued an executive order forming all troops in McClellan's department into corps. Banks thus became a corps commander, in charge of his own former division, now commanded by Brig. Gen Alpheus Williams, and the division of Brig. Gen James Shields, which was added to Banks's command. After Stonewall Jackson was turned back at the First Battle of Kernstown on March 23, Banks was instead ordered to pursue Jackson up the valley, to prevent him from reinforcing the defenses of Richmond. When Banks's men reached the southern Valley at the end of a difficult supply line, the president recalled them to Strasburg, at the northern end. [52] Jackson then marched rapidly down the adjacent Luray Valley, and encountered some of Banks' forces in the Battle of Front Royal on May 23. This prompted Banks to withdraw to Winchester, where Jackson again attacked on May 25. The Union forces were poorly arrayed in defense, and retreated in disorder across the Potomac River and back into Maryland. [53] An attempt to capture Jackson's forces in a pincer movement (with forces led by John Frémont and Irvin McDowell) failed, and Jackson was able to reinforce Richmond. Banks was criticized for mishandling his troops and performing inadequate reconnaissance in the campaign, [54] while his political allies sought to pin the blame for the debacle on the War Department. [55]

Northern Virginia Campaign

Banks in his military uniform, c. 1861 (portrait by Mathew Brady) GenNPBanks.jpg
Banks in his military uniform, c. 1861 (portrait by Mathew Brady)

In July, Maj. Gen John Pope was placed in command of the newly-formed Army of Virginia, which consisted of the commands of Banks, Irvin McDowell, and Franz Sigel. By early August this force was in Culpeper County. Pope gave Banks an ambiguous series of orders, directing him south of Culpeper to determine enemy strength, hold a fortified defensive position, and to engage the enemy. Banks showed none of the caution he had displayed against Stonewall Jackson in the Valley campaign, and moved to meet a larger force. Confederates he faced were numerically stronger and held, particularly around Cedar Mountain, the high ground. After an artillery duel began the August 9 Battle of Cedar Mountain he ordered a flanking maneuver on the Confederate right. Bank's bold attack seemed close to breaking in the Confederate line, and might have given him a victory if he had committed his reserves in a timely manner. Only excellent commanding by the Confederates at the crucial moment of the battle and the fortuitous arrival of Hill allowed their numerical superiority to tell. [56] Banks thought the battle one of the "best fought"; one of his officers thought it an act of folly by an incompetent general." [57]

The arrival at the end of the day of Union reinforcements under Pope, as well as the rest of Jackson's men, resulted in a two-day stand-off there, with the Confederates finally withdrawing from Cedar Mountain on August 11. Stonewall Jackson observed that Banks's men fought well, and Lincoln also expressed confidence in his leadership. [58] During the Second Battle of Bull Run, Banks was stationed with his corps at Bristoe Station and did not participate in the battle. [59] [60] Afterwards, the corps was integrated into the Army of the Potomac as the XII Corps and marched north with the main army during the Confederate invasion of Maryland. On September 12, Banks was abruptly relieved of command.

Army of the Gulf

Colonel Short's Villa in New Orleans Garden District was the residence of Major General Nathaniel P. Banks, U.S. Commander, Department of the Gulf Colonel-Short's-Villa-818.JPG
Colonel Short's Villa in New Orleans Garden District was the residence of Major General Nathaniel P. Banks, U.S. Commander, Department of the Gulf

In November 1862, President Lincoln gave Banks command of the Army of the Gulf, and asked him to organize a force of 30,000 new recruits, drawn from New York and New England. As a former governor of Massachusetts, he was politically connected to the governors of these states, and the recruitment effort was successful. [61] In December he sailed from New York with a large force of raw recruits to replace Maj. Gen. Benjamin Butler at New Orleans, Louisiana, as commander of the Department of the Gulf. [62] Butler disliked Banks, but welcomed him to New Orleans and briefed him on civil and military affairs of importance. Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy, doubted the wisdom of replacing Butler (also a political general, and later a Massachusetts governor) with Banks, who he thought was a less able leader and administrator. [63] Banks had to contend not just with Southern opposition to the occupation of New Orleans, but also to politically hostile Radical Republicans both in the city and in Washington, who criticized his moderate approach to administration. [64]

Siege of Port Hudson

Part of Banks's orders included instructions to advance up the Mississippi River to join forces with Ulysses S. Grant, in order to gain control of the waterway, which was under Confederate control between Vicksburg, Mississippi and Port Hudson, Louisiana. Grant was moving against Vicksburg, and Banks was under orders to secure Port Hudson before joining Grant at Vicksburg. He did not move immediately, because the garrison at Port Hudson was reported to be large, [65] his new recruits were ill-equipped and insufficiently trained for action, and he was overwhelmed by the bureaucratic demands of administering the occupied portions of Louisiana. [66] He did send forces to reoccupy Baton Rouge, and sent a small expedition that briefly occupied Galveston, Texas but was evicted in the Battle of Galveston on January 1, 1863. [67]

In 1862, several Union gunboats had successfully passed onto the river between Vicksburg and Port Hudson, interfering with Confederate supply and troop movements. In March 1863, after they had been captured or destroyed, naval commander David Farragut sought to run the river past Port Hudson in a bid to regain control over that area, and convinced Banks to make a diversionary land attack on the Confederate stronghold. Banks marched with 12,000 men from Baton Rouge on March 13, but was unable to reach the enemy position due to inaccurate maps. He then compounded the failure to engage the enemy with miscommunications with Farragut. [68] [69] The naval commander successfully navigated two gunboats past Port Hudson, taking fire en route, without support. Banks ended up retreating back to Baton Rouge, his troops plundering all along the way. The episode was a further blow to Banks's reputation as a military commander, leaving many with the false impression he had not wanted to support Farragut. [68]

1860s map showing the Siege of Port Hudson Siege of Port Hudson.jpg
1860s map showing the Siege of Port Hudson

Under political pressure to show progress, Banks embarked on operations to secure a route that bypassed Port Hudson via the Red River in late March. [70] He was eventually able to reach Alexandria, Louisiana, but stiff resistance from the smaller forces of Confederate General Richard Taylor meant he did not get there until early May. His army seized thousands of bales of cotton, and Banks claimed to have interrupted supplies to Confederate forces further east. During these operations Admiral Farragut turned command of the naval forces assisting Banks over to David Porter, with whom Banks had a difficult and prickly relationship. [71]

Following a request from Grant for assistance against Vicksburg, Banks finally laid siege to Port Hudson in May 1863. [72] Two attempts to storm the works, as with Grant at Vicksburg, were dismal failures. The first, made against the entrenched enemy on May 27, failed because of inadequate reconnaissance and because Banks failed to ensure the attacks along the line were coordinated. [73] [74] After a bloody repulse, Banks continued the siege, and launched a second assault on June 14. It was also badly coordinated, and the repulse was equally bloody: each of the two attacks resulted in more than 1,800 Union casualties. [73] The Confederate garrison under General Franklin Gardner surrendered on July 9, 1863, after receiving word that Vicksburg had fallen. [75] This brought the entire Mississippi River under Union control. The siege of Port Hudson was the first time that African-American soldiers were used in a major Civil War battle. The United States Colored Troops were authorized in 1863 and recruiting and training had to be conducted. [76] [77]

In the autumn of 1863, Lincoln and Chief of Staff Henry Halleck informed Banks that plans should be made for operations against the coast of Texas, chiefly for the purpose of preventing the French in Mexico from aiding the Confederates or occupying Texas, and to interdict Confederate supplies from Texas heading east. [78] The second objective he attempted to achieve at first by sending a force against Galveston; his troops were badly beaten in the Second Battle of Sabine Pass on September 8. [79] An expedition sent to Brownsville secured possession of the region near the mouth of the Rio Grande and the Texas outer islands in November. [80]

Red River Campaign

Confederate General Richard Taylor opposed Banks in Louisiana. Richard Taylor.jpg
Confederate General Richard Taylor opposed Banks in Louisiana.

As part of operations against Texas, Halleck also encouraged Banks to undertake the Red River Campaign, an overland operation into the resource-rich but well-defended parts of northern Texas. Banks and General Grant both considered the Red River Campaign a strategic distraction, with an eastward thrust to capture Mobile, Alabama preferred. [81] Political forces prevailed, and Halleck drafted a plan for operations on the Red River. [82]

The campaign lasted from March to May 1864, and was a major failure. Banks's army was routed at the Battle of Mansfield (April 8) by General Taylor and retreated 20 miles (32 km) to make a stand the next day at the Battle of Pleasant Hill. Despite winning a tactical victory at Pleasant Hill, Banks continued the retreat to Alexandria, his force rejoining part of Porter's Federal Inland Fleet. That naval force had joined the Red River Campaign to support the army [83] and to take on cotton as a lucrative prize of war. Banks was accused of allowing "hordes" of private cotton speculators to accompany the expedition, but only a few did, and most of the cotton seized was taken by the army or navy. Banks did little, however, to prevent unauthorized agents from working the area. [84] A cooperating land force launched from Little Rock, Arkansas was turned back in the Camden Expedition. [85]

Part of Porter's large fleet became trapped above the falls at Alexandria by low water, engineered by Confederates blowing a dam that had been constructed to artificially raise the water level when first entered by Porter's fleet. [86] Banks and others approved a plan proposed by Joseph Bailey to build wing dams as a means to raise what little water was left in the channel. In ten days, 10,000 troops built two dams, and managed to rescue Porter's fleet, allowing all to retreat to the Mississippi River. [87] After the campaign, General William T. Sherman famously said of the Red River campaign that it was "One damn blunder from beginning to end", [88] and Banks earned the dislike and loss of respect of his officers and rank and file for his mishandling of the campaign. [89] On hearing of Banks's retreat in late April, Grant wired Chief of Staff Halleck asking for Banks to be removed from command. [90] The Confederates held the Red River for the remainder of the war. [91]

Louisiana Reconstruction

Banks undertook a number of steps intended to facilitate the Reconstruction plans of President Lincoln in Louisiana. When Banks arrived in New Orleans, the atmosphere was somewhat hostile to the Union owing to some of Butler's actions. Banks moderated some of Butler's policies, freeing civilians that Butler had detained and reopening churches whose ministers refused to support the Union. He recruited large numbers of African Americans for the military, and instituted formal works and education programs to organize the many slaves who had left their plantations, believing they had been freed. Because Banks believed the plantation owners would need to play a role in Reconstruction, the work program was not particularly friendly to African Americans, requiring them to sign year-long work contracts, and subjecting vagrants to involuntary public work. [92] The education program was effectively shut down after Southerners regained control of the city in 1865. [93]

General Edward Canby succeeded Banks in Louisiana. Edward Canby.png
General Edward Canby succeeded Banks in Louisiana.

In August 1863, President Lincoln ordered Banks to oversee the creation of a new state constitution, and in December granted him wide-ranging authority to create a new civilian government. [94] [95] However, because voter enrollment was low, Banks canceled planned Congressional elections, and worked with civilian authorities to increase enrollment rates. After a February 1864 election organized by Banks, a Unionist government was elected in Louisiana, and Banks optimistically reported to Lincoln that Louisiana would "become in two years, under a wise and strong government, one of the most loyal and prosperous States the world has ever seen." [96] A constitutional convention held from April to July 1864 drafted a new constitution that provided for the emancipation of slaves. [97] Banks was a significant influence on the convention, insisting that provisions be included for African-American education and at least partial suffrage. [98]

By the time the convention ended, Banks's Red River Campaign had come to its ignominious end and Banks was superseded in military (but not political) matters by Major General Edward Canby. President Lincoln ordered Banks to oversee elections held under the new constitution in September, and then ordered him to return to Washington to lobby Congress for acceptance of Louisiana's constitution and elected Congressmen. [99] Radical Republicans in Congress railed against his political efforts in Louisiana, [100] and refused to seat Louisiana's two Congressmen in early 1865. After six months, Banks returned to Louisiana to resume his military command under Canby. However, he was politically trapped between the civilian government and Canby, and resigned from the army in May 1865 after one month in New Orleans. He returned to Massachusetts in September 1865. [101] In early 1865, Secretary of War Halleck ordered William Farrar Smith and James T. Brady to investigate breaches of Army regulations during the occupation of New Orleans. The commissioners' report, which was not published, found that the military administration was riddled by "oppression, peculation, and graft". [102]

Military recognition of Banks's service in the war included election in 1867 and 1875 as commander of the Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company of Massachusetts. [103] In 1892, he was elected as a Veteran First Class Companion of the Massachusetts Commandery of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States, a military society for officers who had served the Union during the Civil War. [104]

Postbellum career

On his return to Massachusetts, Banks immediately ran for Congress, for a seat vacated by the resignation of Radical Republican Daniel W. Gooch. The Massachusetts Republican Party, dominated by Radicals, opposed his run, but he prevailed easily at the state convention and in the general election, partially by wooing Radical voters by proclaiming support for Negro suffrage. [105] He served from 1865 to 1873, during which time he chaired the Foreign Affairs Committee. [106] Despite his nominally moderate politics, he was forced to vote with the Radicals on many issues, to avoid being seen as a supporter of President Johnson's policies. [107] He was active in supporting the reconstruction work he had done in Louisiana, trying to get its Congressional delegation seated in 1865. He was opposed in this by a powerful faction in Louisiana, who argued he had essentially set up a puppet regime. He also alienated Radical Republicans by accepting a bill on the matter that omitted a requirement that states not be readmitted until they had given their African-American citizenry voting rights. [108] Despite his position as chair of an important committee, Banks was snubbed by President Grant, who worked around him whenever possible. [109]

During this period in Congress, Banks was one of the strongest early advocates of Manifest destiny. He introduced the Annexation Bill of 1866 promoting offers to annex all of British North America (effectively today's Canada) in order to appeal to his heavily Irish-American constituency and to tap into the anger the American public felt towards Britain in its unofficial support for the Confederacy, such as blockade runners supplying weapons (which lengthened the war by two years and killed 400,000 additional Americans). [110] [111] This and other proposals he made died in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Charles Sumner. [112] [113] Banks also played a significant role in securing passage of the Alaska Purchase funding bill, enacted in 1868. [114] Banks' financial records strongly suggest he received a large gratuity from the Russian minister after the Alaska legislation passed. [115] Although questions were raised not long after the bill's passage, a House investigation of the matter effectively whitewashed the affair. Biographer Fred Harrington believes that Banks would have supported the legislation regardless of the payment he is alleged to have received. [116] Banks also supported unsuccessful efforts to acquire some Caribbean islands, including the Danish West Indies and the Dominican Republic. [117] He spoke out in support of Cuban independence. [118]

In 1872, Banks joined the Liberal-Republican revolt in support of Horace Greeley. He had to some degree opposed a party trend away from labor reform, a subject that was close to many of his working-class constituents, but not the wealthy businessmen who were coming to dominate the Republican Party. [119] While Banks was campaigning across the North for Greeley, the Radical Daniel W. Gooch successfully gathered enough support to defeat him for reelection; it was Banks' first defeat by Massachusetts voters. After his loss, Banks invested in an unsuccessful start-up Kentucky railroad headed by John Frémont, hoping its income would substitute for the political loss. [120]

Seeking a revival of his political fortunes, in 1873, Banks ran successfully for the Massachusetts Senate, supported by a coalition of Liberal Republicans, Democrats, and Labor Reform groups. The latter groups he wooed in particular, adopting support for shorter workdays. In that term, he help draft and secure passage of a bill restricting hours of women and children to ten hours per day. [121] In 1874, Banks was elected to Congress again, supported by a similar coalition in defeating Gooch. [122] He served two terms (1875–1879), losing in the 1878 nominating process after formally rejoining the Republican fold. He was accused in that campaign of changing his positions too often to be considered reliable. [123] After his defeat, President Rutherford B. Hayes appointed Banks as a United States marshal for Massachusetts as a patronage reward for his service. He held the post from 1879 until 1888, but exercised poor oversight over his subordinates. He consequently became embroiled in legal action over the recovery of unpaid fees. [124]

In 1888, Banks once again won a seat in Congress. He did not have much influence, because his mental health was failing. [125] After one term he was not renominated, and retired to Waltham. [126] His health continued to deteriorate, and he was briefly sent to McLean Hospital shortly before his death in Waltham on September 1, 1894. [127] His death made nationwide headlines; he is buried in Waltham's Grove Hill Cemetery. [126]

Legacy and honors

Statue of Banks by Henry Hudson Kitson in Waltham, Massachusetts Nathaniel Prentice Banks statue, Waltham, MA - 2.JPG
Statue of Banks by Henry Hudson Kitson in Waltham, Massachusetts

Fort Banks in Winthrop, Massachusetts, built in the late 1890s, was named for him. [128] A statue of him stands in Waltham's Central Square, [129] and Banks Street in New Orleans is named after him, as is Banks Court in Chicago's Gold Coast neighborhood. [130] The incorporated village of Banks, Michigan, was named for him in 1871.[ citation needed ] The Gale-Banks House, his home in Waltham from 1855 to his death, is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. [131]

See also

Notes

  1. Many short biographical summaries spell his middle name "Prentiss." He is known to have spelled it "Prentice".
  2. Hollandsworth 1998, p. 3.
  3. Hollandsworth 1998, p. 4.
  4. Harrington 1948, p. 3.
  5. Reef 2009, p. 327.
  6. Rosenberg 2004, p. 41.
  7. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 5–8.
  8. Harrington 1948, p. 4.
  9. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 8–9.
  10. Harrington 1948, p. 8.
  11. Banks 2005, pp. 9–25.
  12. Hollandsworth 1998, p. 10.
  13. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 10–11.
  14. Hollandsworth 1998, p. 12.
  15. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 13–14.
  16. Harrington 1948, p. 10.
  17. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 15–16.
  18. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 16–17.
  19. Harrington 1948, pp. 18–21.
  20. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 20–21.
  21. Harrington 1948, p. 19.
  22. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 22–23.
  23. Harrington 1948, pp. 23–25.
  24. Hollandsworth 1998, p. 24.
  25. Harrington 1948, p. 26.
  26. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 25–27.
  27. Harrington 1948, p. 31.
  28. Hollandsworth 1998, p. 28.
  29. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 30–33.
  30. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 34–35.
  31. 1 2 Voss-Hubbard 1995, pp. 173–174.
  32. Von Frank 1998, p. 1.
  33. Harrington 1948, p. 46.
  34. 1 2 Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 37–38.
  35. Baum 1984, p. 48.
  36. Harrington 1948, pp. 47–48.
  37. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 40–41.
  38. Harrington 1948, p. 48.
  39. Pearson, pp. 1:119–120,123-128
  40. 1 2 Harrington 1948, p. 52.
  41. Harrington 1948, p. 50.
  42. Hollandsworth 1998, p. 44.
  43. Hollandsworth 1998, p. 43.
  44. Baum 1984, p. 57.
  45. Harrington 1948, pp. 52–53.
  46. Work, pp. 10–11
  47. Harrington 1948, p. 55.
  48. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 44–45.
  49. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 46–48.
  50. 1 2 Harris, pp. 66–80
  51. Work, pp. 160–161
  52. Work, pp. 58–59
  53. Work, pp. 60–61
  54. Work, pp. 61–63
  55. Harrington 1948, p. 79.
  56. McPherson, James M. Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. Oxford History of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988. ISBN   0-19-503863-0
  57. Work, p. 69
  58. Harrington 1948, p. 84.
  59. Hollandsworth 1998, p. 81.
  60. Harrington 1948, p. 85.
  61. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 83–85.
  62. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 84–86.
  63. Winters, p. 146
  64. Harrington 1948, pp. 94–103.
  65. Work, p. 99
  66. Patterson, pp. 76–77
  67. Dupree, pp. 25–30
  68. 1 2 Work, p. 100
  69. Dupree, pp. 32–33
  70. Dupree, pp. 41–44
  71. Dupree, pp. 42–44
  72. Dupree, p. 45
  73. 1 2 Work, p. 104
  74. Dupree, pp. 44–47
  75. Dupree, p. 48
  76. Patterson, p. 84
  77. Hewitt, pp. 174–178
  78. Dupree, pp. 49–51
  79. Dupree, pp. 55–61
  80. Dupree, pp. 70–74
  81. Johnson, pp. 1–36
  82. Work, p. 123
  83. Work, pp. 123–128
  84. Harrington 1948, pp. 160–162.
  85. Work, pp. 123–124
  86. Robertson, pp. 4
  87. Work, p. 128
  88. Robertson, p. 168
  89. Work, p. 127
  90. Joiner, p. 160
  91. Otto, p. 21
  92. Dawson, pp. 11–14
  93. Harrington 1948, pp. 108–110.
  94. Dawson, p. 16
  95. Tunnell, p. 30
  96. Dawson, pp. 16–18
  97. Dawson, p. 18
  98. Tunnell, p. 79
  99. Dawson, p. 19
  100. Harrington 1948, pp. 163–165.
  101. Dawson, pp. 19–23
  102. Capers, pp. 117–119
  103. Smith, p. xxvii
  104. "Original Companions of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States: Surnnames Beginning with the Letter B". MOLLUS. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved January 10, 2017.
  105. Harrington 1948, pp. 169–170.
  106. Harrington 1948, p. 175.
  107. Harrington 1948, p. 171.
  108. Richards, pp. 219–221
  109. Baum 1984, p. 169.
  110. David Keys (June 24, 2014). "Historians reveal secrets of UK gun-running which lengthened the American civil war by two years". The Independent .
  111. Harrington 1948, pp. 175–178.
  112. Harrington 1948, p. 180.
  113. Harrington 1948, p. 181.
  114. Harrington 1948, pp. 182–183.
  115. Banks 2005, pp. 1312–1317.
  116. Harrington 1948, p. 183.
  117. Harrington 1948, pp. 188–190.
  118. Harrington 1948, p. 191.
  119. Harrington 1948, pp. 198–201.
  120. Harrington 1948, p. 203.
  121. Harrington 1948, pp. 204–205.
  122. Harrington 1948, p. 205.
  123. Harrington 1948, pp. 206–207.
  124. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 248–249.
  125. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 249–250.
  126. 1 2 Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 252–253.
  127. Hollandsworth 1998, pp. 251–252.
  128. Plaque on site provided by Winthrop Historical Commission. Photographed October 19, 2009
  129. Hollandsworth 1998, p. 254.
  130. "Chicago Streets" (PDF). Chicago History Museum. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 25, 2011. Retrieved January 10, 2017.
  131. "MACRIS inventory record and NRHP nomination for Gale-Banks House". Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Retrieved April 26, 2014.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abraham Lincoln</span> President of the United States from 1861 to 1865

Abraham Lincoln was an American lawyer, politician, and statesman, who served as the 16th president of the United States, from 1861 until his assassination in 1865. Lincoln led the United States through the American Civil War, defending the nation as a constitutional union, defeating the insurgent Confederacy, playing a major role in the abolition of slavery, expanding the power of the federal government, and modernizing the U.S. economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Civil War</span> 1861–1865 conflict in the United States

The American Civil War was a civil war in the United States between the Union and the Confederacy, which had been formed by states that had seceded from the Union. The central cause of the war was the dispute over whether slavery would be permitted to expand into the western territories, leading to more slave states, or be prevented from doing so, which many believed would place slavery on a course of ultimate extinction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">P. G. T. Beauregard</span> Confederate States Army general (1818–1893)

Pierre Gustave Toutant-Beauregard, of Louisiana Creole descent, was the Confederate General who started the American Civil War at the battle of Fort Sumter on April 12, 1861. Today, he is commonly referred to as P. G. T. Beauregard, but he rarely used his first name as an adult. He signed correspondence as G. T. Beauregard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Vicksburg</span> Battle of the American Civil Wars Anaconda Plan

The siege of Vicksburg was the final major military action in the Vicksburg campaign of the American Civil War. In a series of maneuvers, Union Major General Ulysses S. Grant and his Army of the Tennessee crossed the Mississippi River and drove the Confederate Army of Mississippi, led by Lieutenant General John C. Pemberton, into the defensive lines surrounding the fortress city of Vicksburg, Mississippi, leading to the successful siege and Confederate surrender.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Port Hudson</span> Battle of the American Civil War

The siege of Port Hudson was the final engagement in the Union campaign to recapture the Mississippi River in the American Civil War. While Union General Ulysses Grant was besieging Vicksburg upriver, General Nathaniel Banks was ordered to capture the lower Mississippi Confederate stronghold of Port Hudson, Louisiana, to go to Grant's aid. When his assault failed, Banks settled into a 48-day siege, the longest in US military history up to that point. A second attack also failed, and it was only after the fall of Vicksburg that the Confederate commander, General Franklin Gardner, surrendered the port. The Union gained control of the river and navigation from the Gulf of Mexico through the Deep South and to the river's upper reaches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Mansfield</span> 1864 battle of the American Civil War

The Battle of Mansfield, also known as the Battle of Sabine Crossroads, on April 8, 1864, in Louisiana formed part of the Red River Campaign during the American Civil War, when Union forces were attempting to occupy the Louisiana state capital, Shreveport.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vicksburg campaign</span> 1862–63 American Civil War campaign in Mississippi

The Vicksburg campaign was a series of maneuvers and battles in the Western Theater of the American Civil War directed against Vicksburg, Mississippi, a fortress city that dominated the last Confederate-controlled section of the Mississippi River. The Union Army of the Tennessee under Major General Ulysses S. Grant gained control of the river by capturing this stronghold and defeating Lieutenant General John C. Pemberton's forces stationed there.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oliver P. Morton</span> American politician (1823–1877)

Oliver Hazard Perry Throck Morton, commonly known as Oliver P. Morton, was a U.S. Republican Party politician from Indiana. He served as the 14th governor of Indiana during the American Civil War, and was a stalwart ally of President Abraham Lincoln. Morton worked hard to maximize Indiana's contribution to the war effort and marginalize the obstructionists. He was a principled and effective leader who fought for equality and nationalism through the use of governmental power. His forceful pursuit of civil rights and prosecution of Copperheads and white supremacists gained him lasting enemies among the antiwar elements. Morton thwarted and neutralized the Democratic-controlled Indiana General Assembly. He exceeded his constitutional authority by calling out the militia without approval, and during the period of legislative suppression he privately financed the state government through unapproved federal and private loans. He was criticized for arresting and detaining political enemies and suspected southern sympathizers. As one of President Lincoln's "war governors", Morton made significant contributions to the war effort, more than any other man in the state, and earned the lifelong gratitude of former Union soldiers for his support.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Benjamin Butler</span> American general and politician (1818–1893)

Benjamin Franklin Butler was an American major general of the Union Army, politician, lawyer, and businessman from Massachusetts. Born in New Hampshire and raised in Lowell, Massachusetts, Butler was a political major general of the Union Army during the American Civil War and had a leadership role in the impeachment of U.S. President Andrew Johnson. He was a colorful and often controversial figure on the national stage and on the Massachusetts political scene, serving five terms in the U.S. House of Representatives and running several campaigns for governor before his election to that office in 1882.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Milliken's Bend</span> Battle of the American Civil War

The Battle of Milliken's Bend was fought on June 7, 1863, as part of the Vicksburg Campaign during the American Civil War. Major General Ulysses S. Grant of the Union Army had placed the strategic Mississippi River city of Vicksburg, Mississippi, under siege in mid-1863. Confederate leadership erroneously believed that Grant's supply line still ran through Milliken's Bend in Louisiana, and Major General Richard Taylor was tasked with disrupting it to aid the defense of Vicksburg. Taylor sent Brigadier General Henry E. McCulloch with a brigade of Texans to attack Milliken's Bend, which was held by a brigade of newly-recruited African American soldiers. McCulloch's attack struck early on the morning of June 7, and was initially successful in close-quarters fighting. Fire from the Union gunboat USS Choctaw halted the Confederate attack, and McCulloch later withdrew after the arrival of a second gunboat. The attempt to relieve Vicksburg was unsuccessful. One of the first actions in which African American soldiers fought, Milliken's Bend demonstrated the value of African American soldiers as part of the Union Army.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Red River campaign</span> Military campaign during the American Civil War

The Red River campaign, also known as the Red River expedition, was a major Union offensive campaign in the Trans-Mississippi theater of the American Civil War, which took place from March 10 to May 22, 1864. It was launched through the densely forested gulf coastal plain region between the Red River Valley and central Arkansas towards the end of the war. The offensive was intended to stop Confederate use of the Louisiana port of Shreveport, open an outlet for the sugar and cotton of northern Louisiana, and to split the Confederate lines, allowing the Union to encircle and destroy the Confederate military forces in Louisiana and southern Arkansas. It marked the last major offensive attempted by the Union in the Trans-Mississippi Theater.

The Battle of Plains Store was fought on May 21, 1863, in East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, during the campaign to capture Port Hudson in the American Civil War. Union troops advancing from Baton Rouge, Louisiana, clashed with 600 Confederates at a road junction. The initial Confederate force withdrew, but 400 more Confederates arrived from Port Hudson. Some of the Confederate reinforcement overran Union artillery and routed a Union regiment, but were unable to capture the guns. Union reinforcements advanced to the front, attacked part of the Confederate force and drove them from the field. The Confederates withdrew to Port Hudson, which was almost entirely surrounded by Union troops the next day. Port Hudson was under siege until the defenders surrendered on July 9.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capture of New Orleans</span> 1862 battle of the American Civil War

The capture of New Orleans during the American Civil War was a turning point in the war that precipitated the capture of the Mississippi River. Having fought past Forts Jackson and St. Philip, the Union was unopposed in its capture of the city itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry Gardner</span> American politician

Henry Joseph Gardner was the 23rd Governor of Massachusetts, serving from 1855 to 1858. Gardner, a Know Nothing, was elected governor as part of the sweeping victory of Know Nothing candidates in the Massachusetts elections of 1854.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massachusetts in the American Civil War</span> Union state in the American Civil War

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts played a significant role in national events prior to and during the American Civil War (1861–1865). Massachusetts dominated the early antislavery movement during the 1830s, motivating activists across the nation. This, in turn, increased sectionalism in the North and South, one of the factors that led to the war. Politicians from Massachusetts, echoing the views of social activists, further increased national tensions. The state was dominated by the Republican Party and was also home to many Radical Republican leaders who promoted harsh treatment of slave owners and, later, the former civilian leaders of the Confederate States of America and the military officers in the Confederate States Army.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Louisiana in the American Civil War</span> Overview of role and events of Louisiana during the American Civil War

Louisiana was a dominant population center in the southwest of the Confederate States of America, controlling the wealthy trade center of New Orleans, and contributing the French Creole and Cajun populations to the demographic composition of a predominantly Anglo-American country. In the antebellum period, Louisiana was a slave state, where enslaved African Americans had comprised the majority of the population during the eighteenth-century French and Spanish dominations. By the time the United States acquired the territory (1803) and Louisiana became a state (1812), the institution of slavery was entrenched. By 1860, 47% of the state's population were enslaved, though the state also had one of the largest free black populations in the United States. Much of the white population, particularly in the cities, supported slavery, while pockets of support for the U.S. and its government existed in the more rural areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Presidency of Abraham Lincoln</span> U.S. presidential administration from 1861 to 1865

The presidency of Abraham Lincoln began on March 4, 1861, when Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated as the 16th president of the United States, and ended upon his assassination and death on April 15, 1865, 42 days into his second term. Lincoln was the first member of the recently established Republican Party elected to the presidency. Lincoln successfully presided over the Union victory in the American Civil War, which dominated his presidency and resulted in the end of slavery.

The 41st Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry was a three-year infantry regiment that served in the Union Army during the American Civil War. It was recruited as part of Governors Banks' and Andrew's recruitment drives to supply the union with a military force to hold and expand Union control of the lower Mississippi. In the late winter/early spring of 1863, it was converted to mounted infantry and later to cavalry. On its conversion in June 1863 at Port Hudson, it was disestablished and re-established as the 3rd Massachusetts Volunteer Cavalry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ulysses S. Grant and the American Civil War</span> Wartime career of the prominent Union General.

Ulysses S. Grant was the most acclaimed Union general during the American Civil War and was twice elected president. Grant began his military career as a cadet at the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1839. After graduation he went on to serve with distinction as a lieutenant in the Mexican–American War. Grant was a keen observer of the war and learned battle strategies serving under Generals Zachary Taylor and Winfield Scott. After the war Grant served at various posts especially in the Pacific Northwest; he was forced to retire from the service in 1854 due to accusations of drunkenness. He was unable to make a success of farming and on the onset of the Civil War in April 1861, Grant was working as a clerk in his father's leather goods store in Galena, Illinois. When the war began his military experience was needed, and Congressman Elihu B. Washburne became his patron in political affairs and promotions in Illinois and nationwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radical Democracy Party (United States)</span> American political party

The Radical Democracy Party was an abolitionist and anti-Confederate political party in the United States. The party was formed to contest the 1864 presidential election and it was made up largely of disaffected Radical Republicans who felt that President Abraham Lincoln was too moderate on the issues of slavery and racial equality. John C. Frémont was nominated as the party's presidential candidate, with John Cochrane as his running mate. However, their campaign failed to gain momentum and, not wanting to act as a spoiler against Lincoln, they withdrew from the race in September.

References

Further reading

Party political offices
Preceded by Republican nominee for Governor of Massachusetts
1857, 1858, 1859
Succeeded by
Military offices
Preceded by Commander of the Department of the Shenandoah
July 25, 1861 – March 18, 1862
Succeeded by
Command reorganized as V Corps
Preceded by
Himself as Commander of Department of the Shenandoah
Commander of V Corps
March 18, 1862–4 April 1862
Succeeded by
Command reorganized as Department of the Shenandoah
Preceded by
Himself as commander of V Corps
Commander of the Department of the Shenandoah
April 4, 1862 – June 26, 1862
Succeeded by
Command reorganized as II Corps Army of Virginia
Preceded by
Himself as Commander of Department of the Shenandoah
Commander of II Corps Army of Virginia
June 26, 1862 – September 12, 1862
Succeeded by
Preceded by Commander of the Department of the Gulf
December 15, 1862 – September 23, 1864
Succeeded by
Political offices
Preceded by Governor of Massachusetts
January 7, 1858 – January 3, 1861
Succeeded by
U.S. House of Representatives
Preceded by Member of the  U.S. House of Representatives
from Massachusetts's 7th congressional district

March 4, 1853 – December 24, 1857
Succeeded by
Preceded by Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives
February 2, 1856 – March 3, 1857
Succeeded by
Preceded by Member of the  U.S. House of Representatives
from Massachusetts's 6th congressional district

December 4, 1865 – March 3, 1873
Succeeded by
Preceded by Member of the  U.S. House of Representatives
from Massachusetts's 5th congressional district

March 4, 1875 – March 3, 1879
Succeeded by
Preceded by Member of the  U.S. House of Representatives
from Massachusetts's 5th congressional district

March 4, 1889 – March 3, 1891
Succeeded by