Ontario Hospital Association

Last updated

Ontario Hospital Association
Company typeNon-profit organization
IndustryHealth Care
FoundedToronto, Canada (1924 (1924))
Headquarters
Toronto
,
Canada
Key people
Anthony Dale (President and CEO)
Marcia Visser (OHA Board Chair, 2012–2013)
Website oha.com

According to the Ontario Hospital Association (OHA) website, the OHA is a member association that represents approximately 154 public hospitals in Ontario. The association characterizes itself as "the voice of Ontario's public hospitals". [1]

Contents

History

At the request of Dr. Fred W. Routley, then the Ontario Director of the Canadian Red Cross, a group of hospital workers met on December 13, 1923 at the Toronto Academy of Medicine to establish the OHA. The 58 attendees consisted of hospital physicians, nurses, superintendents, business managers, trustees and association executives.

In addition to launching the OHA at that meeting, the attendees also agreed that the organization's first convention would be held the following fall. That convention, held October 2-3, 1924, also marked the OHA's annual general meeting. Registered participants in these events totaled 106. Discussion spanned a range of topics including everything from the high costs of hospitalization to financial problems and a new blood transfusion method. (Source: "80 Years of Progress", the Ontario Hospital Association)

Historical context

Canadian historian David Gagan, in a section of the book "Health and Canadian society: sociological perspectives", discusses the rise of the modern hospital in Ontario from 1880 to 1950, from which the following information is derived. [2]

Until the end of the 19th century, Canadian hospitals mainly cared for the indigent, with middle-class patients favouring medical care at home to care in the hospital. New technology – laboratories, x-ray machines, hospital child birth, and antiseptic surgery – radically transformed hospitals in a short period of time up to the end of the First World War in 1918 and made them more acceptable to middle-class patients. However, these technologies were expensive and the allowance paid to hospitals by the government to cover the costs of caring for indigent patients did not meet the actual costs. Since hospitals were still mandated to care for indigents, middle-class patients were charged more and more to subsidize care for the poor. This eventually strained patients' capacity to pay.

At that time, hospitals' total income from all sources of revenue – including paying patients, municipal and government subsidization, donor contributions – were only enough to maintain a static system, not an enterprise that was now improving during a time of medical progress.

In 1927, these emerging challenges led the President of the OHA to note that it was neither useful nor realistic to continue in this manner, and the idea of the hospital as a purely charitable endeavour was rendered obsolete. He proposed instead that the goal of the modern hospital was to provide the best diagnostic and therapeutic facilities available for a fee to patients who paid the full cost of their care. The government's insufficient subsidy for indigent patients transferred the fiscal burden to paying patients ("people of moderate means") and diverted any additional hospital income to cover the costs of non-paying patients.

This was seen as a barrier to medical progress. According to Gagan, the objective was not to deny indigent patients access to hospital care, but to appeal to middle-class self-interest in order to spur statutory changes in government social policy that would explicitly recognize that hospitals were no longer charitable enterprises. Rather, hospitals had become centers for the scientific treatment of diseases among all classes for a fair price in relation to the value of the product and the ability of the consumer to pay for non-profit treatment. The OHA and hospitals wanted a shift from the traditional charitable role of hospitals, to one that was "committed to scientific professionalism and recognized the realities of hospital economics".

In a 1936 study (Ontario Survey of General Hospitals, 1940) undertaken by the Ontario Department of Health during the Depression, it was noted that lengths-of-stay (LOS) for the poor and indigent patients increased, while LOS decreased for paying patients. The report, which was finalized in 1940, concluded that the trend of hospitals returning to their former role as custodial care facilities and municipalities' mounting expenditures on medical care, was a temporary condition. Among the recommendations was to police the hospitals to eliminate waste, inefficiency and long-stay indigent patients.

This government rationale was among the factors that drew interest among federal and provincial constituencies which included the OHA, to support the idea of health insurance. In 1943, Prime Minister WLM King created an Advisory Committee on Health Insurance to consult broadly on the issue, which consequently produced the Heagarty Committee Report. In the meantime, private carriers and not-for-profit organizations such as Blue Cross, which was organized by the Canadian Hospital Association, had begun to provide voluntary group hospitalization insurance coverage through employers. "The hard times of the 1930s created the momentum behind the establishment of Blue Cross® in Ontario." [3] By 1956, 50% of Canadians were covered by voluntary private or nonprofit prepayment plans, but public pressure for a nationwide program to protect people from catastrophic health-care costs was growing. [4]

On a provincial level, as early as the 1940s, the OHA began to step up its lobbying efforts to government on behalf of Ontario hospitals, primarily for funds (which was a prime function of the OHA since its inception), because of new challenges such as the spiraling costs of health care, which did not match government funding. One of the proposed solutions at the time was universal hospital insurance, which the OHA generally supported.

Years later, in 1957, Ontario Premier Leslie M. Frost tabled the Ontario memorandum and proposal on hospital care insurance before the Ontario Legislature. During his speech, he publicly acknowledged a body of experts who helped conduct studies related to this proposal, which included the executive of the Ontario Hospital Association and the Blue Cross. [5] He added that as part of the conditions of implementation, the plan was to be "administered by the Ontario Hospital Service Commission, either through the agency of the Blue Cross or by a crown corporation similar to the Blue Cross, and by personnel drawn from the Ontario Hospital Association."

"In 1959, the Government of Ontario launched the Ontario Hospital Insurance Plan. 600 Blue Cross employees as well as most of its top management team moved over to help guide in the plan's development." [6]

On a national level, Medicare developed in two stages. The first was the Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Act of 1957, which gave the Canadian government authority to enter into an agreement with the provinces to establish a comprehensive, universal plan covering acute hospital care and laboratory and radiology diagnostic services. Nine years later, the Medical Care Act of 1966 extended health insurance to cover doctors' services. This led to a federal government offer to share, on a grant-in-aid basis, the costs of a Canada-wide plan, on condition that the majority of provinces take part and a majority of the population be covered. By mid-1957, eight provinces indicated that they would join in such a proposal. By 1961 all provinces had hospital plans in operation and 99% of the population was covered. This included coverage for all standard-ward hospital care." [7]

Executives

Anthony Dale is the current president and chief executive officer, appointed to the position in December 2013. Dominic Giroux is the 2023-2024 chair of the board.

Additional resources

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicare (Canada)</span> Canadas publicly funded, single-payer health care system

Medicare is an unofficial designation used to refer to the publicly funded single-payer healthcare system of Canada. Canada's health care system consists of 13 provincial and territorial health insurance plans, which provide universal healthcare coverage to Canadian citizens, permanent residents, and depending on the province or territory, certain temporary residents. The systems are individually administered on a provincial or territorial basis, within guidelines set by the federal government. The formal terminology for the insurance system is provided by the Canada Health Act and the health insurance legislation of the individual provinces and territories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare industry</span> Economic sector focused on health

The healthcare industry is an aggregation and integration of sectors within the economic system that provides goods and services to treat patients with curative, preventive, rehabilitative, and palliative care. It encompasses the creation and commercialization of products and services conducive to the preservation and restoration of well-being. The contemporary healthcare sector comprises three fundamental facets, namely services, products, and finance. It can be further subdivided into numerous sectors and categories and relies on interdisciplinary teams of highly skilled professionals and paraprofessionals to address the healthcare requirements of both individuals and communities.

<i>Canada Health Act</i> Canadian federal law for health care funding

The Canada Health Act, adopted in 1984, is the federal legislation in Canada for publicly-funded health insurance, commonly called "medicare", and sets out the primary objective of Canadian healthcare policy.

Health insurance or medical insurance is a type of insurance that covers the whole or a part of the risk of a person incurring medical expenses. As with other types of insurance, risk is shared among many individuals. By estimating the overall risk of health risk and health system expenses over the risk pool, an insurer can develop a routine finance structure, such as a monthly premium or payroll tax, to provide the money to pay for the health care benefits specified in the insurance agreement. The benefit is administered by a central organization, such as a government agency, private business, or not-for-profit entity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparison of the healthcare systems in Canada and the United States</span> Healthcare system comparison

A comparison of the healthcare systems in Canada and the United States is often made by government, public health and public policy analysts. The two countries had similar healthcare systems before Canada changed its system in the 1960s and 1970s. The United States spends much more money on healthcare than Canada, on both a per-capita basis and as a percentage of GDP. In 2006, per-capita spending for health care in Canada was US$3,678; in the U.S., US$6,714. The U.S. spent 15.3% of GDP on healthcare in that year; Canada spent 10.0%. In 2006, 70% of healthcare spending in Canada was financed by government, versus 46% in the United States. Total government spending per capita in the U.S. on healthcare was 23% higher than Canadian government spending. U.S. government expenditure on healthcare was just under 83% of total Canadian spending.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Canada</span>

Healthcare in Canada is delivered through the provincial and territorial systems of publicly funded health care, informally called Medicare. It is guided by the provisions of the Canada Health Act of 1984, and is universal. The 2002 Royal Commission, known as the Romanow Report, revealed that Canadians consider universal access to publicly funded health services as a "fundamental value that ensures national health care insurance for everyone wherever they live in the country."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two-tier healthcare</span> Unequal access to higher quality healthcare

Two-tier healthcare is a situation in which a basic government-provided healthcare system provides basic care, and a secondary tier of care exists for those who can pay for additional, better quality or faster access. Most countries have both publicly and privately funded healthcare, but the degree to which it creates a quality differential depends on the way the two systems are managed, funded, and regulated.

The term managed care or managed healthcare is used in the United States to describe a group of activities intended to reduce the cost of providing health care and providing American health insurance while improving the quality of that care. It has become the predominant system of delivering and receiving American health care since its implementation in the early 1980s, and has been largely unaffected by the Affordable Care Act of 2010.

...intended to reduce unnecessary health care costs through a variety of mechanisms, including: economic incentives for physicians and patients to select less costly forms of care; programs for reviewing the medical necessity of specific services; increased beneficiary cost sharing; controls on inpatient admissions and lengths of stay; the establishment of cost-sharing incentives for outpatient surgery; selective contracting with health care providers; and the intensive management of high-cost health care cases. The programs may be provided in a variety of settings, such as Health Maintenance Organizations and Preferred Provider Organizations.

Health care prices in the United States of America describe market and non-market factors that determine pricing, along with possible causes as to why prices are higher than in other countries.

A public hospital, or government hospital, is a hospital which is government owned and is fully funded by the government and operates solely off the money that is collected from taxpayers to fund healthcare initiatives. In almost all the developed countries but the United States of America, and in most of the developing countries, this type of hospital provides medical care free of charge to patients, covering expenses and wages by government reimbursement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emergency medical services in Canada</span> Overview of emergency medical services in Canada

Emergency medical services in Canada are the responsibility of each Canadian province or territory. The services, including both ambulance and paramedic services, may be provided directly by the province, contracted to a private provider, or delegated to local governments, which may in turn create service delivery arrangements with municipal departments, hospitals or private providers. The approach, and the standards, vary considerably between provinces and territories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of medicine in Canada</span>

Hospitals in Canada were initially places which cared for the poor as those with higher socioeconomic status were cared for at home. In Quebec during the 18th century, a series of charitable institutions, many set up by Catholic religious orders, provided such care.

In the United States, health insurance helps pay for medical expenses through privately purchased insurance, social insurance, or a social welfare program funded by the government. Synonyms for this usage include "health coverage", "health care coverage", and "health benefits". In a more technical sense, the term "health insurance" is used to describe any form of insurance providing protection against the costs of medical services. This usage includes both private insurance programs and social insurance programs such as Medicare, which pools resources and spreads the financial risk associated with major medical expenses across the entire population to protect everyone, as well as social welfare programs like Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, which both provide assistance to people who cannot afford health coverage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Germany</span> Overview of healthcare in the Federal Republic of Germany

Germany has a universal multi-payer health care system paid for by a combination of statutory health insurance and private health insurance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kingston General Hospital</span> Hospital in Ontario, Canada

The Kingston General Hospital (KGH) site is an acute-care teaching hospital affiliated with Queen's University located in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Along with the Hotel Dieu Hospital (HDH) site, these hospitals deliver health care services to more than 500,000 residents throughout southeastern Ontario; conduct health care research and train future health care professionals.

Balance billing, sometimes called surprise billing, is a medical bill from a healthcare provider billing a patient for the difference between the total cost of services being charged and the amount the insurance pays. It is a pervasive problem in the United States with providers who are out of network, and therefore not subject to the rates or terms of providers who are in-network. Balance billing has a variable prevalence by market and specialty.

<i>Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act</i> Repealed Canadian legislation for health care funding

The Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act is a statute passed by the Parliament of Canada in 1957 that reimbursed one-half of provincial and territorial costs for hospital and diagnostic services administered under provincial and territorial health insurance programs. Originally implemented on July 1, 1958, with five participating provinces, by January 1, 1961, all ten provinces were enlisted. The federal funding was coupled with terms and conditions borrowed from the Saskatchewan Hospital Services Plan, introduced in 1947 as the first universal hospital insurance program in North America. In order to receive funding, services had to be universal, comprehensive, accessible and portable. This stipulation was dropped in 1977 with the Established Programs Financing Act and then reinstated in 1984 in the Canada Health Act. Widely acknowledged as the foundation for future developments in the Canadian health care system, the HIDS Act was a landmark example of federal-provincial cooperation in post-war Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Liechtenstein</span> Overview of healthcare in Liechtenstein

The nation of Liechtenstein has a universal health care system with decentralized, free market elements through mandated health insurance coverage for every person residing in the country.

Ontario Blue Cross is a registered trademark in Health Insurance. It is owned by Canassurance Hospital Service Association, a member of the Canadian Association of Blue Cross Plans.

References

  1. 80 Years of Progress. Toronto: The Ontario Hospital Association. p. 1.11.
  2. Gagan, David (1998). For Patients of "Moderate Means": The Transformation of Ontario's Public General Hospitals, 1880–1950. Health and Canadian society: sociological perspectives, Third edition: University of Toronto Press. pp. 420–437.
  3. "Ontario Blue Cross – History". Archived from the original on April 5, 2011. Retrieved February 24, 2011.
  4. "The Canadian Encyclopedia – Health Policy". Archived from the original on June 29, 2006. Retrieved February 24, 2011.
  5. "Ontario Urges Ottawa Reconsider Hospital Offer". The Windsor Daily Star. January 29, 1957. Archived from the original on July 30, 2016. Retrieved February 24, 2011.
  6. "Ontario Blue Cross – History". Archived from the original on April 5, 2011. Retrieved February 24, 2011.
  7. "Health policy". The Canadian Encyclopedia.