Order of battle at the Battle of Camperdown

Last updated
The Battle of Camperdown, painted by Philip de Loutherbourg in 1799. Phillip James De Loutherbourg - The Battle of Camperdown - Google Art Project.jpg
The Battle of Camperdown, painted by Philip de Loutherbourg in 1799.

The Battle of Camperdown was an important naval action of the French Revolutionary Wars, fought off Camperduin on the North Holland coast on 11 October 1797 between a British fleet under Admiral Adam Duncan and a Dutch fleet under Vice-Admiral Jan de Winter. The French Republic had overrun the Dutch Republic two years earlier, reforming it into the Batavian Republic. In early 1797, the Batavian Navy was ordered to sail to Brest and unite with the French Atlantic Fleet in preparation for an invasion of Ireland. [1] Shortly afterwards, the British fleets were paralysed by the Spithead and Nore mutinies, in which the sailors refused to take their ships to sea until they were awarded better pay and conditions. [2] For two months[ citation needed ], the English Channel was undefended, but the Dutch failed to take the opportunity to sail from their harbour in the Texel: their preparations were not complete, and a small squadron of loyal British ships under Duncan convinced de Winter that the British fleet was at sea by sending nonsensical signals to fictitious ships over the horizon. [3]

Contents

By October 1797, the plan to attack Ireland had been abandoned and the British North Sea Fleet was again at full strength. During a brief period replenishing supplies at Yarmouth, news reached Duncan on 10 October that the Dutch had sailed on a raiding cruise[ citation needed ] and he returned to the Dutch coast, intercepting de Winter's fleet on its way back to the Texel. [4] The Dutch formed a line of battle in shallow coastal waters to meet Duncan's attack, which was conducted in a confused mass, the British fleet separating into two groups that struck the vanguard and rear of the Dutch fleet, [5] overwhelming each in turn and capturing eleven ships, including de Winter's flagship Vrijheid. [6] On the return journey, three of the captured ships were lost, and none of the surviving Dutch prizes was ever suitable for active service again[ citation needed ]. [7] Both sides suffered heavy casualties during the battle as each fleet had been trained to aim at the hulls of their opponents, maximising the damage to personnel. [8]

Although the sailors of both fleets fought hard, they were suffering from popular unrest; the mutinies in Britain continued to overshadow the Royal Navy, while the Dutch sailors were unhappy with French dominion and, in marked difference to their officers, were generally supporters of the exiled House of Orange. [9] In addition, the Dutch were disaffected and poorly trained due to the long months blockaded in their harbours, which made them inferior seamen and gunners when compared with the highly experienced British crews, [10] and the Dutch ships were more weakly constructed than their British counterparts with a shallower draught, a necessity in the shallow waters of the Dutch coast but a liability when fighting warships built for the open ocean. [11] The Dutch did, however, have the advantage of weight of shot, especially when their well-armed frigates and brigs are included statistically. Unlike their British equivalents, these lighter craft were intended to contribute in battle, covering the gaps in the line between their larger companions. [12]

Orders of battle

The ships in the orders of battle below are listed in the order in which they appeared in the respective battle lines. Listed in the casualties section are the totals of killed and wounded as best as can be established: due to the nature of the battle, Dutch losses were hard to calculate precisely. Officers killed in action or who subsequently died of wounds received are marked with a † symbol. As carronades were not traditionally taken into consideration when calculating a ship's rate, [13] these ships may have actually been carrying additional or fewer guns than indicated below.

British fleet

Admiral Duncan's fleet [14] [15]
Ship Rate GunsCommanderCasualtiesNotes
KilledWoundedTotal
Windward division
HMS Triumph Third rate 74Captain William Essington
29
55
84
Hull and masts damaged, ten guns dismounted
HMS Venerable Third rate 74Admiral Adam Duncan
Captain William George Fairfax
15
62
77
Hull and masts very badly damaged
HMS Ardent Third rate 64Captain Richard Rundle Burges  
41
107
148
Hull and masts very badly damaged
HMS Bedford Third rate 74Captain Sir Thomas Byard
30
41
71
Hull and rigging badly damaged
HMS Lancaster Third rate 64Captain John Wells
3
18
21
Lightly damaged
HMS Belliqueux Third rate 64Captain John Inglis
25
78
103
Hull and rigging badly damaged
HMS Adamant Fourth rate 50Captain William Hotham
0
0
0
Undamaged
HMS Isis Fourth rate 50Captain William Mitchell
2
21
23
Lightly damaged
HMS Circe Sixth rate 28Captain Peter Halkett
0
0
0
Not engaged in the action.
Leeward division
HMS Russell Third rate 74Captain Henry Trollope
0
7
7
Lightly damaged
HMS Director Third rate 64Captain William Bligh
0
7
7
Masts and rigging damaged
HMS Montagu Third rate 74Captain John Knight
3
5
8
Lightly damaged
HMS Veteran Third rate 64Captain George Gregory
4
21
25
Three guns dismounted, otherwise lightly damaged
HMS Monarch Third rate 74Vice-Admiral Richard Onslow
Captain Edward O'Bryen
36
100
136
Hull and masts very badly damaged
HMS Powerful Third rate 74Captain William O'Bryen Drury
10
78
88
Hull and masts badly damaged
HMS Monmouth Third rate 64Captain James Walker
5
22
27
Lightly damaged
HMS Agincourt Third rate 64Captain John Williamson
0
0
0
Very lightly damaged
HMS Beaulieu Fifth rate 40Captain Francis Fayerman
0
0
0
Undamaged
Minor warships
HMS Martin Sloop 16Commander Charles Paget
0
0
0
Not engaged in the action.
Rose Hired cutter 10Lieutenant Joseph Brodie
0
0
0
Not engaged in the action.
King George Hired cutter 12Lieutenant James Rains
0
0
0
Not engaged in the action.
ActiveHired cutter 12Lieutenant J. Hamilton
0
0
0
Not engaged in the action.
DiligentHired cutter 6Lieutenant T. Dawson
0
0
0
Not engaged in the action.
SpeculatorHired lugger 8Lieutenant H. Hales
0
0
0
Not engaged in the action.
Total casualties: 203 killed, 622 wounded

Batavian fleet

Vice-Admiral de Winter's fleet [14] [16]
Line of battle
Ship Rate GunsCommanderCasualtiesNotes
KilledWoundedTotal
Gelijkheid * Third rate 68Commander H. A. Ruijsch40 killed [17] Badly damaged and may have been dismasted. Captured at 15:10, later became HMS Gelykheid
Beschermer Fourth rate 56Captain Dooitze Eelkes Hinxt   UnknownLightly damaged
Hercules * Third rate 64Commander RuijsoortUnknownHull very badly damaged and set on fire, mizenmast collapsed. Captured and became HMS Delft.
Admiraal Tjerk Hiddes De Vries * Third rate 68Captain J. B. ZegersUnknownBadly damaged and ship may have been dismasted. Captured at 15:00, later became HMS Devries
Vrijheid * Third rate 74Vice-Admiraal Jan de Winter
Commander L. W. van Rossum  
5898156 [17] Hull very badly damaged and ship dismasted. Captured at 15:15, later became HMS Vryheid
Staaten Generaal Third rate 74Rear-Admiral Samuel Story 204060 [18] Hull badly damaged, masts and rigging lightly damaged
Wassenaar * Third rate 64Commander A. Holland   UnknownDamaged. First captured at 14:00, subsequently rejoined the combat and was captured again. Later became HMS Wassenaer
Batavier Fourth rate 56Commander SouterUnknownLightly damaged
Brutus Third rate 74Rear-Admiral Johan Bloys van Treslong
Commodore Polders
105060 [18] Lightly damaged
Leijden Third rate 68Commander J. D. MusquetierUnknownLightly damaged
Mars Fifth rate razee 44Commander D. H. Kolff11415 [18] Mizenmast collapsed
Cerberus Third rate 68Commander Jacobsen5914 [18] Lightly damaged
Jupiter * Third rate 72Rear-Admiral Hermanus Reijntjes   61 killed [17] Hull and rigging severely damaged, main and mizenmasts collapsed. Captured at 13:45, later became HMS Camperdown
Haarlem * Third rate 68Captain O. WiggertsHeavy casualtiesHull severely damaged and mizenmast collapsed. Captured at 13:15, later became HMS Haerlem
Alkmaar * Fourth rate 56Captain J. W. Krafft266282 [18] Hull severely damaged and ship dismasted in the immediate aftermath of the battle. Captured at 14:30, later became HMS Alkmaar.
Delft * Fourth rate 56Captain Gerrit Verdooren van Asperen 4376119 [17] Hull severely damaged. Captured at 14:15. Sank during journey to Britain with the loss of an additional 34 lives. [19]
Frigate line
Atalante Brig 18Commander B. PletszUnknown
Heldin Fifth rate 32Commander Johan Ferdinand Dumesnil de l'EstrilleUnknown
Galathée Brig 18Commander RiverijUnknown
Minerva Sixth rate 24Commander EijlbrachtUnknown
Ajax Brig 18Lieutenant ArkenboutUnknown
Waakzaamheid Sixth rate 24Commander Meindert van NieropUnknown
Ambuscade * Fifth rate 36Commander J. HuijsUnknownCaptured but later driven ashore on the Dutch coast and retaken by Dutch forces
Daphné Brig 18Lieutenant FrederiksUnknownBadly damaged
Monnikkendam * Fifth rate 44Commander Thomas Lancester50 killed [17] Badly damaged. Captured at 14:00 but subsequently wrecked on the Dutch coast
Haasje Advice boat 6Lieutenant HartingveldUnknown
Total casualties: 540 killed, 620 wounded

Related Research Articles

Glorious First of June Naval battle of the French Revolutionary Wars

The Glorious First of June, also known as the Fourth Battle of Ushant, was the first and largest fleet action of the naval conflict between the Kingdom of Great Britain and the First French Republic during the French Revolutionary Wars.

Adam Duncan, 1st Viscount Duncan

Admiral Adam Duncan, 1st Viscount Duncan, KB was a British admiral who defeated the Dutch fleet off Camperdown on 11 October 1797. This victory is considered one of the most significant actions in naval history.

Battle of Camperdown Major naval action of the French Revolutionary Wars

The Battle of Camperdown was a major naval action fought on 11 October 1797, between the British North Sea Fleet under Admiral Adam Duncan and a Batavian Navy (Dutch) fleet under Vice-Admiral Jan de Winter. The battle was the most significant action between British and Dutch forces during the French Revolutionary Wars and resulted in a complete victory for the British, who captured eleven Dutch ships without losing any of their own. In 1795, the Dutch Republic had been overrun by the army of the French Republic and had been reorganised into the Batavian Republic, a French client state. In early 1797, after the French Atlantic Fleet had suffered heavy losses in a disastrous winter campaign, the Dutch fleet was ordered to reinforce the French at Brest. The rendezvous never occurred; the continental allies failed to capitalise on the Spithead and Nore mutinies that paralysed the British Channel forces and North Sea fleets during the spring of 1797.

<i>The Fireship</i>

The Fireship is one of a series of nautical novels by C. Northcote Parkinson. It is set in the late 18th century, when Britain was at war with Revolutionary France. Parkinson's hero is a junior naval officer. Unlike many fictional officers Parkinson's hero, Richard Delancey, does not have any powerful patrons to ease his way to promotion.

Battle of Tory Island 1798 naval action off the coast of Donegal, Ireland

The Battle of Tory Island was a naval action of the French Revolutionary Wars, fought on 12 October 1798 between French and British squadrons off the northwest coast of County Donegal, then in the Kingdom of Ireland. The last action of the Irish Rebellion of 1798, the Battle of Tory Island ended the final attempt by the French Navy to land substantial numbers of soldiers in Ireland during the war.

Samuel Story

Samuel Story was a vice admiral of the Batavian Republic Navy. He commanded the squadron that surrendered without a fight to the Royal Navy at the Vlieter incident in 1799.

French expedition to Ireland (1796) Failed attempt to invade Ireland by the French

The French expedition to Ireland, known in French as the Expédition d'Irlande, was an unsuccessful attempt by the French Republic to assist the outlawed Society of United Irishmen, a popular rebel Irish republican group, in their planned rebellion against British rule during the French Revolutionary Wars. The French intended to land a large expeditionary force in Ireland during the winter of 1796–1797 which would join with the United Irishmen and drive the British out of Ireland. The French anticipated that this would be a major blow to British morale, prestige and military effectiveness, and was also intended to possibly be the first stage of an eventual invasion of Britain itself. To this end, the Directory gathered a force of approximately 15,000 soldiers at Brest under General Lazare Hoche during late 1796, in readiness for a major landing at Bantry Bay in December.

French order of battle in the Expédition dIrlande

The Expédition d'Irlande was a French attempt to invade Ireland in December 1796 during the French Revolutionary Wars. Encouraged by representatives of the Society of United Irishmen, an Irish republican organisation, the French Directory decided that the best strategy for eliminating Britain from the war was to invade Ireland, then under British control. It was hoped that a substantial invasion in the summer of 1796 would encourage a widespread uprising among the Irish population and force the British to abandon Ireland, providing a major strategic and propaganda coup for the French Republic and a staging point for a subsequent invasion of Britain. Assigned to lead the operation was General Lazare Hoche, the Republic's most successful military commander, who was provided with a significant body of troops and the services of the entire French Atlantic fleet.[A]

Action of 24 October 1798 A minor naval engagement of the French Revolutionary Wars, fought between a British Royal Navy frigate and two ships of the Batavian Navy

The action of 24 October 1798 was a minor naval engagement of the French Revolutionary Wars, fought between a British Royal Navy frigate and two ships of the Batavian Navy. The Dutch ships were intercepted in the North Sea within hours of leaving port, 30 nautical miles (56 km) northwest of the Texel, by the British ship HMS Sirius. Both Dutch vessels were carrying large quantities of military supplies and French soldiers, reinforcements for the French and Irish forces participating in the Irish Rebellion of 1798. Although the rebellion had been defeated a month earlier, word of the British victory had not yet reached the European continent, and the Dutch force was intended to supplement a larger French squadron sent earlier in October. The French had already been defeated at the Battle of Tory Island and the Dutch suffered a similar outcome, both ships defeated in turn by the larger and better armed British vessel.

Sir William Hotham GCB was an officer of the Royal Navy who saw service during the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars.

Johan Arnold Bloys van Treslong

Johan Arnold Bloys van Treslong was a Dutch naval officer and Patriot. He started his naval career in 1772, serving as a midshipman with the Admiralty of the Maze. He served under the Dutch Republic on the North Sea, in the West Indies and in battle with Barbary pirates in the Mediterranean.

HMS Adamant was a 50-gun Portland-class fourth rate warship of the British Royal Navy. She served during the American War of Independence, the French Revolutionary Wars, and the Napoleonic Wars in a career that spanned thirty years.

Batavian Navy

The Batavian navy was the navy of the Batavian Republic. A continuation of the Staatse vloot of the Dutch Republic, though thoroughly reorganized after the Batavian Revolution of 1795, the navy embarked on several naval construction programs which, at least on paper, made her a serious rival of the Royal Navy during War of the Second Coalition. However, the Capitulation of Saldanha Bay, the Battle of Camperdown and the Vlieter Incident showed that she did not measure up to that expectation. Nevertheless, the organisational reorganizations proved durable, when the Batavian Republic was succeeded by the Kingdom of Holland, and later, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, so that the present-day Royal Netherlands Navy should trace its ancestry through her.

Action of 22 August 1795

The action of 22 August 1795 was a minor naval engagement during the French Revolutionary Wars between a squadron of four British Royal Navy frigates and two frigates and a cutter from the Batavian Navy. The engagement was fought off the Norwegian coastal island of Eigerøya, then in Danish Norway, the opposing forces engaged in protecting their respective countries' trade routes to the Baltic Sea. War between Britain and the Batavian Republic began, undeclared, in the spring of 1795 after the Admiralty ordered British warships to intercept Batavian shipping following the conquest of the Dutch Republic by the French Republic in January 1795.

Action of 12 May 1796

The action of 12 May 1796 was a minor naval engagement during the French Revolutionary Wars between a squadron of British Royal Navy frigates and a frigate and four smaller ships of the Batavian Navy. The British squadron had been detached on the previous day from the British North Sea fleet under Admiral Adam Duncan, which was cruising off the Batavian fleet anchorage at the Texel, while the Batavian squadron was returning to the Netherlands from the Norwegian coast where it had been sheltering since suffering defeat at the action of 22 August 1795 the previous year. As the Batavian squadron neared the Batavian coast, the British squadron under Captain Lawrence Halstead attacked.

Dooitze Eelkes Hinxt was a Dutch navy officer. He was the son of Eelke Tabes Hinxt, a merchant captain from the city of Dokkum. Hinxt died on the ship of war Beschermer, due to the wounds he received during the battle of Camperdown.

Dutch ship <i>Staaten Generaal</i>

The Staaten Generaal was a Dutch 74-gun third rate ship of the line which served in the navy of the Dutch Republic and the Batavian Republic. The order to construct the ship was given by the Admiralty of the Meuse. The ship was commissioned in 1786.

East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars

The East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars was a series of campaigns related to the major European conflict known as the French Revolutionary Wars, fought between 1793 and 1801 between the new French Republic and its allies and a shifting alliance of rival powers. Although the Indian Ocean was separated by vast distance from the principal theatre of the conflict in Western Europe, it played a significant role due to the economic importance of the region to Great Britain, France's most constant opponent, of its colonies in India and the Far Eastern trade.

Capitulation of Saldanha Bay Surrender in 1796 to the British Royal Navy of a Dutch expeditionary force sent to recapture the Dutch Cape Colony

The Capitulation of Saldanha Bay was the surrender in 1796 to the British Royal Navy of a Dutch expeditionary force sent to recapture the Dutch Cape Colony. In 1794, early in the French Revolutionary Wars, the army of the French Republic overran the Dutch Republic which then became a French client state, the Batavian Republic. Great Britain was concerned by the threat the Dutch Cape Colony in Southern Africa posed to its trade routes to British India. It therefore sent an expeditionary force that landed at Simon's Town in June 1795 and forced the surrender of the colony in a short campaign. The British commander, Vice-Admiral Sir George Elphinstone, then reinforced the garrison and stationed a naval squadron at the Cape to protect the captured colony.

Dutch ship <i>Batavier</i> (1779)

Batavier was a Dutch 56-gun fourth-rate ship of the line of the navy of the Admiralty of Amsterdam. In 1795 she became part of the Batavian Navy, and on 30 August 1799 was captured by the Royal Navy, who retained her in various subsidiary roles until she was broken up in 1823.

References

  1. Pakenham, p. 29
  2. Gardiner, p. 165
  3. Clowes, p. 325
  4. Clowes, p. 326
  5. Lloyd, p. 139
  6. Padfield, p. 103
  7. Clowes, p. 331
  8. James, p. 71
  9. Lloyd, p. 128
  10. Padfield, p. 99
  11. Gardiner, p. 179
  12. James, p. 74
  13. James, Vol. 1, p. 32
  14. 1 2 Clowes, p. 326
  15. James, p. 380
  16. James, p. 381, Lloyd, pp. 145–150
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 Clowes, p. 330
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 James, p. 381
  19. James, p. 76

Bibliography