# Riemann curvature tensor

Last updated

In the mathematical field of differential geometry, the Riemann curvature tensor or Riemann–Christoffel tensor (after Bernhard Riemann and Elwin Bruno Christoffel) is the most common way used to express the curvature of Riemannian manifolds. It assigns a tensor to each point of a Riemannian manifold (i.e., it is a tensor field). It is a local invariant of Riemannian metrics which measure the failure of second covariant derivatives to commute. A Riemannian manifold has zero curvature if and only if it is flat, i.e. locally isometric to the Euclidean space. [1] The curvature tensor can also be defined for any pseudo-Riemannian manifold, or indeed any manifold equipped with an affine connection.

## Contents

It is a central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity, the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of spacetime is in principle observable via the geodesic deviation equation. The curvature tensor represents the tidal force experienced by a rigid body moving along a geodesic in a sense made precise by the Jacobi equation.

## Definition

Let (M, g) be a Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian manifold, and ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {X}}(M)}$ be the space of all vector fields on M. We define a map ${\displaystyle R\colon {\mathfrak {X}}(M)\times {\mathfrak {X}}(M)\times {\mathfrak {X}}(M)\rightarrow {\mathfrak {X}}(M)}$ by the following formula [2] which is in terms of the Levi-Civita connection ${\displaystyle \nabla }$:

${\displaystyle R(X,Y)Z=\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}Z-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}Z-\nabla _{[X,Y]}Z}$

or equivalently

${\displaystyle R(X,Y)=[\nabla _{X},\nabla _{Y}]-\nabla _{[X,Y]}}$

where [X, Y] is the Lie bracket of vector fields and ${\displaystyle [\nabla _{X},\nabla _{Y}]}$ is a commutator of differential operators. For each pair of tangent vectors u, v, R(u, v) is a linear transformation of the tangent space of the manifold. It is linear in u and v, and so defines a tensor. Occasionally, the curvature tensor is defined with the opposite sign.

If ${\displaystyle X=\partial /\partial x^{i}}$ and ${\displaystyle Y=\partial /\partial x^{j}}$ are coordinate vector fields then ${\displaystyle [X,Y]=0}$ and therefore the formula simplifies to

${\displaystyle R(X,Y)Z=\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}Z-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}Z.}$

The curvature tensor measures noncommutativity of the covariant derivative, and as such is the integrability obstruction for the existence of an isometry with Euclidean space (called, in this context, flat space). The linear transformation ${\displaystyle w\mapsto R(u,v)w}$ is also called the curvature transformation or endomorphism.

The curvature formula can also be expressed in terms of the second covariant derivative defined as: [3]

${\displaystyle \nabla _{u,v}^{2}w=\nabla _{u}\nabla _{v}w-\nabla _{\nabla _{u}v}w}$

which is linear in u and v. Then:

${\displaystyle R(u,v)=\nabla _{u,v}^{2}-\nabla _{v,u}^{2}}$

Thus in the general case of non-coordinate vectors u and v, the curvature tensor measures the noncommutativity of the second covariant derivative.

## Geometric meaning

### Informally

One can see the effects of curved space by comparing a tennis court and the Earth. Start at the lower right corner of the tennis court, with a racket held out towards north. Then while walking around the outline of the court, at each step make sure the tennis racket is maintained in the same orientation, parallel to its previous positions. Once the loop is complete the tennis racket will be parallel to its initial starting position. This is because tennis courts are built so the surface is flat. On the other hand, the surface of the Earth is curved: we can complete a loop on the surface of the Earth. Starting at the equator, point a tennis racket north along the surface of the Earth. Once again the tennis racket should always remain parallel to its previous position, using the local plane of the horizon as a reference. For this path, first walk to the north pole, then turn 90 degrees and walk down to the equator, and finally turn 90 degrees and walk back to the start. However now the tennis racket will be pointing backwards (towards the east). This process is akin to parallel transporting a vector along the path and the difference identifies how lines which appear "straight" are only "straight" locally. Each time a loop is completed the tennis racket will be deflected further from its initial position by an amount depending on the distance and the curvature of the surface. It is possible to identify paths along a curved surface where parallel transport works as it does on flat space. These are the geodesic of the space, for example any segment of a great circle of a sphere.

The concept of a curved space in mathematics differs from conversational usage. For example, if the above process was completed on a cylinder one would find that it is not curved overall as the curvature around the cylinder cancels with the flatness along the cylinder, this is a consequence of Gaussian curvature and the Gauss–Bonnet theorem. A familiar example of this is a floppy pizza slice which will remain rigid along its length if it is curved along its width.

The Riemann curvature tensor is a way to capture a measure of the intrinsic curvature. When you write it down in terms of its components (like writing down the components of a vector), it consists of a multi-dimensional array of sums and products of partial derivatives (some of those partial derivatives can be thought of as akin to capturing the curvature imposed upon someone walking in straight lines on a curved surface).

### Formally

When a vector in a Euclidean space is parallel transported around a loop, it will again point in the initial direction after returning to its original position. However, this property does not hold in the general case. The Riemann curvature tensor directly measures the failure of this in a general Riemannian manifold. This failure is known as the non-holonomy of the manifold.

Let xt be a curve in a Riemannian manifold M. Denote by τxt : Tx0M → TxtM the parallel transport map along xt. The parallel transport maps are related to the covariant derivative by

${\displaystyle \nabla _{{\dot {x}}_{0}}Y=\lim _{h\to 0}{\frac {1}{h}}\left(Y_{x_{0}}-\tau _{x_{h}}^{-1}\left(Y_{x_{h}}\right)\right)=\left.{\frac {d}{dt}}\left(\tau _{x_{t}}Y\right)\right|_{t=0}}$

for each vector field Y defined along the curve.

Suppose that X and Y are a pair of commuting vector fields. Each of these fields generates a one-parameter group of diffeomorphisms in a neighborhood of x0. Denote by τtX and τtY, respectively, the parallel transports along the flows of X and Y for time t. Parallel transport of a vector Z ∈ Tx0M around the quadrilateral with sides tY, sX, −tY, −sX is given by

${\displaystyle \tau _{sX}^{-1}\tau _{tY}^{-1}\tau _{sX}\tau _{tY}Z.}$

This measures the failure of parallel transport to return Z to its original position in the tangent space Tx0M. Shrinking the loop by sending s, t → 0 gives the infinitesimal description of this deviation:

${\displaystyle \left.{\frac {d}{ds}}{\frac {d}{dt}}\tau _{sX}^{-1}\tau _{tY}^{-1}\tau _{sX}\tau _{tY}Z\right|_{s=t=0}=\left(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}-\nabla _{[X,Y]}\right)Z=R(X,Y)Z}$

where R is the Riemann curvature tensor.

## Coordinate expression

Converting to the tensor index notation, the Riemann curvature tensor is given by

${\displaystyle R^{\rho }{}_{\sigma \mu \nu }=dx^{\rho }\left(R\left(\partial _{\mu },\partial _{\nu }\right)\partial _{\sigma }\right)}$

where ${\displaystyle \partial _{\mu }=\partial /\partial x^{\mu }}$ are the coordinate vector fields. The above expression can be written using Christoffel symbols:

${\displaystyle R^{\rho }{}_{\sigma \mu \nu }=\partial _{\mu }\Gamma ^{\rho }{}_{\nu \sigma }-\partial _{\nu }\Gamma ^{\rho }{}_{\mu \sigma }+\Gamma ^{\rho }{}_{\mu \lambda }\Gamma ^{\lambda }{}_{\nu \sigma }-\Gamma ^{\rho }{}_{\nu \lambda }\Gamma ^{\lambda }{}_{\mu \sigma }}$

The Riemann curvature tensor is also the commutator of the covariant derivative of an arbitrary covector ${\displaystyle A_{\nu }}$ with itself: [4] [5]

${\displaystyle A_{\nu$ ;\rho \sigma }-A_{\nu ;\sigma \rho }=A_{\beta }R^{\beta }{}_{\nu \rho \sigma },}

since the connection ${\displaystyle \Gamma ^{\alpha }{}_{\beta \mu }}$ is torsionless, which means that the torsion tensor ${\displaystyle \Gamma ^{\lambda }{}_{\mu \nu }-\Gamma ^{\lambda }{}_{\nu \mu }}$ vanishes.

This formula is often called the Ricci identity. [6] This is the classical method used by Ricci and Levi-Civita to obtain an expression for the Riemann curvature tensor. [7] In this way, the tensor character of the set of quantities ${\displaystyle R^{\beta }{}_{\nu \rho \sigma }}$ is proved.

This identity can be generalized to get the commutators for two covariant derivatives of arbitrary tensors as follows [8]

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&\nabla _{\delta }\nabla _{\gamma }T^{\alpha _{1}\cdots \alpha _{r}}{}_{\beta _{1}\cdots \beta _{s}}-\nabla _{\gamma }\nabla _{\delta }T^{\alpha _{1}\cdots \alpha _{r}}{}_{\beta _{1}\cdots \beta _{s}}\\[3pt]={}&R^{\alpha _{1}}{}_{\rho \delta \gamma }T^{\rho \alpha _{2}\cdots \alpha _{r}}{}_{\beta _{1}\cdots \beta _{s}}+\ldots +R^{\alpha _{r}}{}_{\rho \delta \gamma }T^{\alpha _{1}\cdots \alpha _{r-1}\rho }{}_{\beta _{1}\cdots \beta _{s}}-R^{\sigma }{}_{\beta _{1}\delta \gamma }T^{\alpha _{1}\cdots \alpha _{r}}{}_{\sigma \beta _{2}\cdots \beta _{s}}-\ldots -R^{\sigma }{}_{\beta _{s}\delta \gamma }T^{\alpha _{1}\cdots \alpha _{r}}{}_{\beta _{1}\cdots \beta _{s-1}\sigma }\end{aligned}}}

This formula also applies to tensor densities without alteration, because for the Levi-Civita (not generic) connection one gets: [6]

${\displaystyle \nabla _{\mu }\left({\sqrt {g}}\right)\equiv \left({\sqrt {g}}\right)_{;\mu }=0,}$

where

${\displaystyle g=\left|\det \left(g_{\mu \nu }\right)\right|.}$

It is sometimes convenient to also define the purely covariant version by

${\displaystyle R_{\rho \sigma \mu \nu }=g_{\rho \zeta }R^{\zeta }{}_{\sigma \mu \nu }.}$

## Symmetries and identities

The Riemann curvature tensor has the following symmetries and identities:

Skew symmetry Skew symmetry ${\displaystyle R(u,v)=-R(v,u)}$ ${\displaystyle R_{abcd}=-R_{abdc}}$ ${\displaystyle \langle R(u,v)w,z\rangle =-\langle R(u,v)z,w\rangle }$ ${\displaystyle R_{abcd}=-R_{bacd}}$ ${\displaystyle R(u,v)w+R(v,w)u+R(w,u)v=0}$ ${\displaystyle R_{abcd}+R_{acdb}+R_{adbc}=0}$ ${\displaystyle \langle R(u,v)w,z\rangle =\langle R(w,z)u,v\rangle }$ ${\displaystyle R_{abcd}=R_{cdab}}$ ${\displaystyle \left(\nabla _{u}R\right)(v,w)+\left(\nabla _{v}R\right)(w,u)+\left(\nabla _{w}R\right)(u,v)=0}$ ${\displaystyle R_{abcd;e}+R_{abde;c}+R_{abec;d}=0}$

where the bracket ${\displaystyle \langle ,\rangle }$ refers to the inner product on the tangent space induced by the metric tensor.

The first (algebraic) Bianchi identity was discovered by Ricci, but is often called the first Bianchi identity or algebraic Bianchi identity, because it looks similar to the Bianchi identity below. (Also, if there is nonzero torsion, the first Bianchi identity becomes a differential identity of the torsion tensor.) . It is often written:

${\displaystyle R_{a[bcd]}=0,}$

where the brackets denote the antisymmetric part on the indicated indices. This is equivalent to the previous version of the identity because the Riemann tensor is already skew on its last two indices.

The first three identities form a complete list of symmetries of the curvature tensor, i.e. given any tensor which satisfies the identities above, one can find a Riemannian manifold with such a curvature tensor at some point. Simple calculations show that such a tensor has ${\displaystyle n^{2}\left(n^{2}-1\right)/12}$ independent components. [9] Interchange symmetry follows from these. The algebraic symmetries are also equivalent to saying that R belongs to the image of the Young symmetrizer corresponding to the partition 2+2.

On a Riemannian manifold one has the covariant derivative ${\displaystyle \nabla _{u}R}$ and the Bianchi identity (often called the second Bianchi identity or differential Bianchi identity) takes the form of the last identity in the table.

## Ricci curvature

The Ricci curvature tensor is the contraction of the first and third indices of the Riemann tensor.

${\displaystyle \underbrace {R_{ab}} _{\text{Ricci}}\equiv \underbrace {R^{c}{}_{acb}} _{\text{Riemann}}=g^{cd}\underbrace {R_{cadb}} _{\text{Riemann}}}$

## Special cases

### Surfaces

For a two-dimensional surface, the Bianchi identities imply that the Riemann tensor has only one independent component, which means that the Ricci scalar completely determines the Riemann tensor. There is only one valid expression for the Riemann tensor which fits the required symmetries:

${\displaystyle R_{abcd}=f(R)\left(g_{ac}g_{db}-g_{ad}g_{cb}\right)}$

and by contracting with the metric twice we find the explicit form:

${\displaystyle R_{abcd}=K\left(g_{ac}g_{db}-g_{ad}g_{cb}\right),}$

where ${\displaystyle g_{ab}}$ is the metric tensor and ${\displaystyle K=R/2}$ is a function called the Gaussian curvature and a, b, c and d take values either 1 or 2. The Riemann tensor has only one functionally independent component. The Gaussian curvature coincides with the sectional curvature of the surface. It is also exactly half the scalar curvature of the 2-manifold, while the Ricci curvature tensor of the surface is simply given by

${\displaystyle R_{ab}=Kg_{ab}.}$

### Space forms

A Riemannian manifold is a space form if its sectional curvature is equal to a constant K. The Riemann tensor of a space form is given by

${\displaystyle R_{abcd}=K\left(g_{ac}g_{db}-g_{ad}g_{cb}\right).}$

Conversely, except in dimension 2, if the curvature of a Riemannian manifold has this form for some function K, then the Bianchi identities imply that K is constant and thus that the manifold is (locally) a space form.

## Citations

1. Lee 2018, p. 193.
2. Lee 2018, p. 196.
3. Lawson, H. Blaine, Jr.; Michelsohn, Marie-Louise (1989). . Princeton U Press. p.  154. ISBN   978-0-691-08542-5.
4. Synge J.L., Schild A. (1949). Tensor Calculus. first Dover Publications 1978 edition. pp.  83, 107. ISBN   978-0-486-63612-2.
5. P. A. M. Dirac (1996). General Theory of Relativity. Princeton University Press. ISBN   978-0-691-01146-2.
6. Lovelock, David; Rund, Hanno (1989) [1975]. Tensors, Differential Forms, and Variational Principles. Dover. p. 84,109. ISBN   978-0-486-65840-7.
7. Ricci, Gregorio; Levi-Civita, Tullio (March 1900), "Méthodes de calcul différentiel absolu et leurs applications", Mathematische Annalen, 54 (1–2): 125–201, doi:10.1007/BF01454201
8. Sandberg, Vernon D (1978). "Tensor spherical harmonics on S 2 and S 3 as eigenvalue problems" (PDF). Journal of Mathematical Physics . 19 (12): 2441–2446. Bibcode:1978JMP....19.2441S. doi:10.1063/1.523649.
9. Bergmann P.G. (1976). Introduction to the Theory of Relativity. Dover. pp.  172–174. ISBN   978-0-486-63282-7.

## Related Research Articles

The Einstein–Hilbert action in general relativity is the action that yields the Einstein field equations through the principle of least action. With the (− + + +) metric signature, the gravitational part of the action is given as

In mathematics, a Killing vector field, named after Wilhelm Killing, is a vector field on a Riemannian manifold that preserves the metric. Killing fields are the infinitesimal generators of isometries; that is, flows generated by Killing fields are continuous isometries of the manifold. More simply, the flow generates a symmetry, in the sense that moving each point on an object the same distance in the direction of the Killing vector will not distort distances on the object.

In differential geometry, the Einstein tensor is used to express the curvature of a pseudo-Riemannian manifold. In general relativity, it occurs in the Einstein field equations for gravitation that describe spacetime curvature in a manner that is consistent with conservation of energy and momentum.

In differential geometry, the Cotton tensor on a (pseudo)-Riemannian manifold of dimension n is a third-order tensor concomitant of the metric, like the Weyl tensor. The vanishing of the Cotton tensor for n = 3 is necessary and sufficient condition for the manifold to be conformally flat, as with the Weyl tensor for n ≥ 4. For n < 3 the Cotton tensor is identically zero. The concept is named after Émile Cotton.

In differential geometry, the four-gradient is the four-vector analogue of the gradient from vector calculus.

The mathematics of general relativity refers to various mathematical structures and techniques that are used in studying and formulating Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity. The main tools used in this geometrical theory of gravitation are tensor fields defined on a Lorentzian manifold representing spacetime. This article is a general description of the mathematics of general relativity.

In electromagnetism, the electromagnetic tensor or electromagnetic field tensor is a mathematical object that describes the electromagnetic field in spacetime. The field tensor was first used after the four-dimensional tensor formulation of special relativity was introduced by Hermann Minkowski. The tensor allows related physical laws to be written very concisely.

In general relativity, the metric tensor is the fundamental object of study. It may loosely be thought of as a generalization of the gravitational potential of Newtonian gravitation. The metric captures all the geometric and causal structure of spacetime, being used to define notions such as time, distance, volume, curvature, angle, and separation of the future and the past.

In general relativity, geodesic deviation describes the tendency of objects to approach or recede from one another while moving under the influence of a spatially varying gravitational field. Put another way, if two objects are set in motion along two initially parallel trajectories, the presence of a tidal gravitational force will cause the trajectories to bend towards or away from each other, producing a relative acceleration between the objects.

In differential geometry and mathematical physics, a spin connection is a connection on a spinor bundle. It is induced, in a canonical manner, from the affine connection. It can also be regarded as the gauge field generated by local Lorentz transformations. In some canonical formulations of general relativity, a spin connection is defined on spatial slices and can also be regarded as the gauge field generated by local rotations.

In relativistic physics, the electromagnetic stress–energy tensor is the contribution to the stress–energy tensor due to the electromagnetic field. The stress–energy tensor describes the flow of energy and momentum in spacetime. The electromagnetic stress–energy tensor contains the negative of the classical Maxwell stress tensor that governs the electromagnetic interactions.

The covariant formulation of classical electromagnetism refers to ways of writing the laws of classical electromagnetism in a form that is manifestly invariant under Lorentz transformations, in the formalism of special relativity using rectilinear inertial coordinate systems. These expressions both make it simple to prove that the laws of classical electromagnetism take the same form in any inertial coordinate system, and also provide a way to translate the fields and forces from one frame to another. However, this is not as general as Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime or non-rectilinear coordinate systems.

In physics, Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime govern the dynamics of the electromagnetic field in curved spacetime or where one uses an arbitrary coordinate system. These equations can be viewed as a generalization of the vacuum Maxwell's equations which are normally formulated in the local coordinates of flat spacetime. But because general relativity dictates that the presence of electromagnetic fields induce curvature in spacetime, Maxwell's equations in flat spacetime should be viewed as a convenient approximation.

In the theory of general relativity, a stress–energy–momentum pseudotensor, such as the Landau–Lifshitz pseudotensor, is an extension of the non-gravitational stress–energy tensor that incorporates the energy–momentum of gravity. It allows the energy–momentum of a system of gravitating matter to be defined. In particular it allows the total of matter plus the gravitating energy–momentum to form a conserved current within the framework of general relativity, so that the total energy–momentum crossing the hypersurface of any compact space–time hypervolume vanishes.

The Newman–Penrose (NP) formalism is a set of notation developed by Ezra T. Newman and Roger Penrose for general relativity (GR). Their notation is an effort to treat general relativity in terms of spinor notation, which introduces complex forms of the usual variables used in GR. The NP formalism is itself a special case of the tetrad formalism, where the tensors of the theory are projected onto a complete vector basis at each point in spacetime. Usually this vector basis is chosen to reflect some symmetry of the spacetime, leading to simplified expressions for physical observables. In the case of the NP formalism, the vector basis chosen is a null tetrad: a set of four null vectors—two real, and a complex-conjugate pair. The two real members asymptotically point radially inward and radially outward, and the formalism is well adapted to treatment of the propagation of radiation in curved spacetime. The Weyl scalars, derived from the Weyl tensor, are often used. In particular, it can be shown that one of these scalars— in the appropriate frame—encodes the outgoing gravitational radiation of an asymptotically flat system.

The harmonic coordinate condition is one of several coordinate conditions in general relativity, which make it possible to solve the Einstein field equations. A coordinate system is said to satisfy the harmonic coordinate condition if each of the coordinate functions xα satisfies d'Alembert's equation. The parallel notion of a harmonic coordinate system in Riemannian geometry is a coordinate system whose coordinate functions satisfy Laplace's equation. Since d'Alembert's equation is the generalization of Laplace's equation to space-time, its solutions are also called "harmonic".

There are various mathematical descriptions of the electromagnetic field that are used in the study of electromagnetism, one of the four fundamental interactions of nature. In this article, several approaches are discussed, although the equations are in terms of electric and magnetic fields, potentials, and charges with currents, generally speaking.

In theoretical physics, Lovelock's theory of gravity is a generalization of Einstein's theory of general relativity introduced by David Lovelock in 1971. It is the most general metric theory of gravity yielding conserved second order equations of motion in an arbitrary number of spacetime dimensions D. In this sense, Lovelock's theory is the natural generalization of Einstein's General Relativity to higher dimensions. In three and four dimensions, Lovelock's theory coincides with Einstein's theory, but in higher dimensions the theories are different. In fact, for D > 4 Einstein gravity can be thought of as a particular case of Lovelock gravity since the Einstein–Hilbert action is one of several terms that constitute the Lovelock action.

In mathematics, Ricci calculus constitutes the rules of index notation and manipulation for tensors and tensor fields on a differentiable manifold, with or without a metric tensor or connection. It is also the modern name for what used to be called the absolute differential calculus, developed by Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro in 1887–1896, and subsequently popularized in a paper written with his pupil Tullio Levi-Civita in 1900. Jan Arnoldus Schouten developed the modern notation and formalism for this mathematical framework, and made contributions to the theory, during its applications to general relativity and differential geometry in the early twentieth century.

Lagrangian field theory is a formalism in classical field theory. It is the field-theoretic analogue of Lagrangian mechanics. Lagrangian mechanics is used to analyze the motion of a system of discrete particles each with a finite number of degrees of freedom. Lagrangian field theory applies to continua and fields, which have an infinite number of degrees of freedom.