Sergei Eisenstein

Last updated
Sergei Eisenstein
Sergei Eisenstein 03.jpg
Eisenstein in St. Petersburg, 1910s
Sergei Mikhailovich Eizenshtein

22 January 1898 (O.S. 10 January 1898)
Died11 February 1948(1948-02-11) (aged 50)
Resting place Novodevichy Cemetery, Moscow
Years active1923–1946
Notable work
Spouse(s)Pera Atasheva (birth name Pearl Fogelman) 1934–1948, his death
Awards Stalin prize (1941,1946)

Sergei Mikhailovich Eisenstein (Russian :Сергей Михайлович Эйзенштейн,IPA:  [sʲɪrˈɡʲej mʲɪˈxajləvʲɪtɕ ɪjzʲɪnˈʂtʲejn] , tr. Sergey Mikhaylovich Eizenshteyn; 22 January [ O.S. 10 January] 1898 11 February 1948) was a Soviet film director and film theorist, a pioneer in the theory and practice of montage. He is noted in particular for his silent films Strike (1925), Battleship Potemkin (1925) and October (1928), as well as the historical epics Alexander Nevsky (1938) and Ivan the Terrible (1944, 1958). In its 2019 decennial poll, the magazine Sight & Sound named his Battleship Potemkin the 11th greatest movie of all time. [1]


Early years

Young Sergei with his parents Mikhail and Julia Eisenstein Mikhail-einsenstein-0713-01.jpg
Young Sergei with his parents Mikhail and Julia Eisenstein

Eisenstein [2] was born to a middle-class family in Riga, Latvia (then part of the Russian Empire in the Governorate of Livonia), but his family moved frequently in his early years, as Eisenstein continued to do throughout his life. His father, the famous architect Mikhail Osipovich Eisenstein, was born in Kiev Oblast, to a Jewish merchant father, Osip, and his Swedish wife. [3] [4] The family had converted to the Russian Orthodox Church. His mother, Julia Ivanovna Konetskaya, was from a Russian Orthodox family. [5] She was the daughter of a prosperous merchant. [6] Julia left Riga the same year as the Russian Revolution of 1905, taking Sergei with her to St. Petersburg. [7] Her son would return at times to see his father, who joined them around 1910. [8] Divorce followed and Julia left the family to live in France. [9] Eisenstein was raised as an Orthodox Christian, but became an atheist later on. [10] [11]

At the Petrograd Institute of Civil Engineering, Eisenstein studied architecture and engineering, the profession of his father. [12] In 1918, he left school and joined the Red Army to serve the Bolshevik Revolution, although his father Mikhail supported the opposite side. [13] This brought his father to Germany after the defeat of the Tsarist government, and Sergei to Petrograd, Vologda, and Dvinsk. [14] In 1920, Sergei was transferred to a command position in Minsk, after success providing propaganda for the October Revolution. At this time, he was exposed to Kabuki theatre and studied Japanese, learning some 300 kanji characters, which he cited as an influence on his pictorial development. [15] [16] These studies would lead him to travel to Japan.[ citation needed ]


From theatre to cinema

With Japanese kabuki actor Sadanji Ichikawa II, Moscow, 1928 Sadanji Ichikawa II and Sergei Eisenstein.jpg
With Japanese kabuki actor Sadanji Ichikawa II, Moscow, 1928

Eisenstein moved to Moscow in 1920, and began his career in theatre working for Proletkult. [17] His productions there were entitled Gas Masks, Listen Moscow, and Wiseman . [18] He worked as a designer for Vsevolod Meyerhold. [19] Eisenstein began his career as a theorist in 1923, [20] by writing "The Montage of Attractions" for art journal LEF . [21] His first film, Glumov's Diary (for the theatre production Wiseman), was also made in that same year with Dziga Vertov hired initially as an "instructor" [22] [23]

Strike (1925) was Eisenstein's first full-length feature film. Battleship Potemkin (also 1925) was critically acclaimed worldwide. Mostly owing to this international renown, he was then able to direct October (also known as Ten Days That Shook The World) as part of a grand tenth anniversary celebration of the October Revolution of 1917, and then The General Line (also known as Old and New). While critics outside Soviet Russia praised these works, Eisenstein's focus in the films on structural issues such as camera angles, crowd movements, and montage brought him and like-minded others such as Vsevolod Pudovkin and Alexander Dovzhenko under fire from the Soviet film community. This forced him to issue public articles of self-criticism and commitments to reform his cinematic visions to conform to the increasingly specific doctrines of socialist realism [24] .[ citation needed ]

Travels to western Europe

In the autumn of 1928, with October still under fire in many Soviet quarters, Eisenstein left the Soviet Union for a tour of Europe, accompanied by his perennial film collaborator Grigori Aleksandrov and cinematographer Eduard Tisse. Officially, the trip was supposed to allow the three to learn about sound motion pictures and to present themselves as Soviet artists in person to the capitalist West. For Eisenstein, however, it was also an opportunity to see landscapes and cultures outside the Soviet Union. He spent the next two years touring and lecturing in Berlin, Zürich, London, and Paris. [25] In 1929, in Switzerland, Eisenstein supervised an educational documentary about abortion directed by Tisse, entitled Frauennot – Frauenglück. [26]

American projects

In late April 1930, Jesse L. Lasky, on behalf of Paramount Pictures, offered Eisenstein the opportunity to make a film in the United States. [27] He accepted a short-term contract for $100,000 ($1,500,000 in 2017 dollars) and arrived in Hollywood in May 1930, along with Aleksandrov and Tisse.[ citation needed ]

Eisenstein proposed a biography of munitions tycoon Basil Zaharoff and a film version of Arms and the Man by George Bernard Shaw, and more fully developed plans for a film of Sutter's Gold by Blaise Cendrars, [28] but on all accounts failed to impress the studio's producers. [29] Paramount proposed a film version of Theodore Dreiser's An American Tragedy . [30] This excited Eisenstein, who had read and liked the work, and had met Dreiser at one time in Moscow. Eisenstein completed a script by the start of October 1930, [31] but Paramount disliked it completely and, additionally, found themselves intimidated by Major Frank Pease, [32] president of the Hollywood Technical Director's Institute. Pease, an anti-communist, mounted a public campaign against Eisenstein. On October 23, 1930, by "mutual consent", Paramount and Eisenstein declared their contract null and void, and the Eisenstein party were treated to return tickets to Moscow at Paramount's expense. [33]

Eisenstein was thus faced with returning home a failure. The Soviet film industry was solving the sound-film issue without him; in addition, his films, techniques and theories, such as his formalist film theory, were becoming increasingly attacked as 'ideological failures'. Many of his theoretical articles from this period, such as Eisenstein on Disney , have surfaced decades later as seminal scholarly texts used as curriculum in film schools around the world.[ citation needed ]

Eisenstein and his entourage spent considerable time with Charlie Chaplin, [34] who recommended that Eisenstein meet with a sympathetic benefactor in the person of American socialist author Upton Sinclair. [35] Sinclair's works had been accepted by and were widely read in the USSR, and were known to Eisenstein. The two admired each other, and between the end of October 1930 and Thanksgiving of that year, Sinclair had secured an extension of Eisenstein's absences from the USSR, and permission for him to travel to Mexico. The trip to Mexico was for Eisenstein to make a film produced by Sinclair and his wife Mary, and three other investors organized as the "Mexican Film Trust". [36]

Mexican odyssey

Sergei Eisenstein visiting Rotterdam in 1930

On 24 November 1930, Eisenstein signed a contract with the Trust "upon the basis of his desire to be free to direct the making of a picture according to his own ideas of what a Mexican picture should be, and in full faith in Eisenstein's artistic integrity." [37] The contract also stipulated that the film would be "non-political", that immediately available funding came from Mary Sinclair in an amount of "not less than Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars", [38] that the shooting schedule amounted to "a period of from three to four months", [38] and most importantly that: "Eisenstein furthermore agrees that all pictures made or directed by him in Mexico, all negative film and positive prints, and all story and ideas embodied in said Mexican picture, will be the property of Mrs. Sinclair..." [38] A codicil to the contract allowed that the "Soviet Government may have the [finished] film free for showing inside the U.S.S.R." [39] Reportedly, it was verbally clarified that the expectation was for a finished film of about an hour's duration.[ citation needed ]

By 4 December, Eisenstein was en route to Mexico by train, accompanied by Aleksandrov and Tisse. Later he produced a brief synopsis of the six-part film; this would come, in one form or another, to be the final plan he would settle on for his project. The title for the project, ¡Que viva México!, was decided on some time later still. Whilst in Mexico, he mixed socially with Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera; Eisenstein admired these artists and Mexican culture in general, and they inspired him to call his films "moving frescoes". [40] The left-wing U.S. film community eagerly followed his progress within Mexico, as is chronicled within Chris Robe's book Left of Hollywood: Cinema, Modernism, and the Emergence of U.S. Radical Film Culture. [41]

After a prolonged absence, Joseph Stalin sent a telegram expressing the concern that Eisenstein had become a deserter. [42] Under pressure, Eisenstein blamed Mary Sinclair's younger brother, Hunter Kimbrough, who had been sent along to act as a line producer, for the film's problems. [43] Eisenstein hoped to pressure the Sinclairs to insinuate themselves between him and Stalin, so Eisenstein could finish the film in his own way. The furious Sinclairs shut down production and ordered Kimbrough to return to the United States with the remaining film footage and the three Soviets to see what they could do with the film already shot; estimates of the extent of this range from 170,000 lineal feet with Soldadera unfilmed, [44] to an excess of 250,000 lineal feet. [45]

For the unfinished filming of the "novel" of Soldadera, without incurring any cost, Eisenstein had secured 500 soldiers, 10,000 guns, and 50 cannons from the Mexican Army, [43] but this was lost due to Sinclair's cancelling of production. When Eisenstein arrived at the American border, a customs search of his trunk revealed sketches and drawings of Jesus caricatures amongst other lewd pornographic material. [46] [47] His re-entry visa had expired, [48] and Sinclair's contacts in Washington were unable to secure him an additional extension. Eisenstein, Aleksandrov, and Tisse were allowed, after a month's stay at the U.S.-Mexico border outside Laredo, Texas, a 30-day "pass" to get from Texas to New York, [48] and thence depart for Moscow, while Kimbrough returned to Los Angeles with the remaining film.[ citation needed ]

Eisenstein toured the American South on his way to New York. In mid-1932, the Sinclairs were able to secure the services of Sol Lesser, who had just opened his distribution office in New York, Principal Distributing Corporation. Lesser agreed to supervise post-production work on the miles of negative—at the Sinclairs' expense—and distribute any resulting product. Two short feature films and a short subjectThunder Over Mexico based on the "Maguey" footage, [49] Eisenstein in Mexico, and Death Day respectively—were completed and released in the United States between the autumn of 1933 and early 1934. Eisenstein never saw any of the Sinclair-Lesser films, nor a later effort by his first biographer, Marie Seton, called Time in the Sun , [50] released in 1940. He would publicly maintain that he had lost all interest in the project. In 1978, Gregori Aleksandrov released – with the same name in contravention to the copyright – his own version, which was awarded the Honorable Golden Prize at the 11th Moscow International Film Festival in 1979. Later, in 1998, Oleg Kovalov edited a free version of the film, calling it "Mexican Fantasy".[ citation needed ]

Return to Soviet Union

Eisenstein c. 1935 Sergei Eisenstein 02.jpg
Eisenstein c. 1935

Eisenstein's foray into the West made the staunchly Stalinist film industry look upon him with a suspicion that would never completely disappear. He apparently spent some time in a mental hospital in Kislovodsk in July 1933, [51] ostensibly a result of depression born of his final acceptance that he would never be allowed to edit the Mexican footage. [52] He was subsequently assigned a teaching position at the State Institute of Cinematography where he had taught earlier, and in 1933 and 1934 was in charge of writing the curriculum. [53]

In 1935, Eisenstein was assigned another project, Bezhin Meadow , but it appears the film was afflicted with many of the same problems as ¡Que viva México!. Eisenstein unilaterally decided to film two versions of the scenario, one for adult viewers and one for children; failed to define a clear shooting schedule; and shot film prodigiously, resulting in cost overruns and missed deadlines. Boris Shumyatsky, the de facto head of the Soviet film industry, finally called a halt to the filming and cancelled further production. What appeared to save Eisenstein's career at this point was that Stalin ended up taking the position that the Bezhin Meadow catastrophe, along with several other problems facing the industry at that point, had less to do with Eisenstein's approach to filmmaking as with the executives who were supposed to have been supervising him. Ultimately this came down on the shoulders of Shumyatsky, [54] who in early 1938 was denounced, arrested, tried and convicted as a traitor, and shot.


Eisenstein was thence able to ingratiate himself with Stalin for 'one more chance', and he chose, from two offerings, the assignment of a biopic of Alexander Nevsky , with music composed by Sergei Prokofiev. [55] This time, he was assigned a co-scenarist, Pyotr Pavlenko, [56] to bring in a completed script; professional actors to play the roles; and an assistant director, Dmitri Vasilyev, to expedite shooting. [56]

The result was a film critically well received by both the Soviets and in the West, which won him the Order of Lenin and the Stalin Prize. [57] It was an allegory and stern warning against the massing forces of Nazi Germany, well played and well made. The script had Nevsky utter a number of traditional Russian proverbs, verbally rooting his fight against the Germanic invaders in Russian traditions. [58] This was started, completed, and placed in distribution all within the year 1938, and represented not only Eisenstein's first film in nearly a decade but also his first sound film.[ citation needed ]

Within months of its release, Stalin entered into a pact with Hitler, and Alexander Nevsky was promptly pulled from distribution. Eisenstein returned to teaching, and was assigned to direct Richard Wagner's Die Walküre at the Bolshoi Theatre. [57] After the outbreak of war with Germany in 1941, Alexander Nevsky was re-released with a wide distribution and earned international success. With the war approaching Moscow, Eisenstein was one of many filmmakers evacuated to Alma-Ata, where he first considered the idea of making a film about Tsar Ivan IV. Eisenstein corresponded with Prokofiev from Alma-Ata, and was joined by him there in 1942. Prokofiev composed the score for Eisenstein's film and Eisenstein reciprocated by designing sets for an operatic rendition of War and Peace that Prokofiev was developing. [59]

Ivan trilogy

Eisenstein's film Ivan the Terrible, Part I, presenting Ivan IV of Russia as a national hero, won Stalin's approval (and a Stalin Prize), [60] but the sequel, Ivan The Terrible, Part II, was criticized by various authorities and went unreleased until 1958. All footage from Ivan The Terrible, Part III was confiscated whilst the film was still incomplete, and most of it was destroyed, though several filmed scenes exist. [61] [62]

Personal life

In 1934, in the Soviet Union, Eisenstein married filmmaker and screenwriter Pera Atasheva (born Pearl Moiseyevna Fogelman; 1900 – 24 September 1965). [63] [64] [65] There have been debates about Eisenstein's sexuality, with a film covering Eisenstein's homosexuality allegedly running into difficulties in Russia. [66] [67] Eisenstein never publicly acknowledged his homosexuality, but it has long been a subject of debate. [68] .


Eisenstein suffered a heart attack on 2 February 1946, and spent much of the following year recovering. He died of a second heart attack on 11 February 1948, at the age of 50. [69] His body lay in state in the Hall of the Cinema Workers before being cremated on 13 February, and his ashes were buried in the Novodevichy Cemetery in Moscow. [70]

Film theorist

Eisenstein was a pioneer in the use of montage, a specific use of film editing. He and his contemporary Lev Kuleshov, two of the earliest film theorists, argued that montage was the essence of the cinema. His articles and books—particularly Film Form and The Film Sense—explain the significance of montage in detail.

His writings and films have continued to have a major impact on subsequent filmmakers. Eisenstein believed that editing could be used for more than just expounding a scene or moment, through a "linkage" of related images. Eisenstein felt the "collision" of shots could be used to manipulate the emotions of the audience and create film metaphors. He believed that an idea should be derived from the juxtaposition of two independent shots, bringing an element of collage into film. He developed what he called "methods of montage":

  1. Metric [71]
  2. Rhythmic [72]
  3. Tonal [73]
  4. Overtonal [74]
  5. Intellectual [75]

Eisenstein taught film-making during his career at GIK where he wrote the curricula for the directors' course; [76] his classroom illustrations are reproduced in Vladimir Nizhniĭ's Lessons with Eisenstein. Exercises and examples for students were based on rendering literature such as Honoré de Balzac's Le Père Goriot. [77] Another hypothetical was the staging of the Haitian struggle for independence as depicted in Anatolii Vinogradov's The Black Consul, [78] influenced as well by John Vandercook's Black Majesty. [79]

Lessons from this scenario delved into the character of Jean-Jacques Dessalines, replaying his movements, actions, and the drama surrounding him. Further to the didactics of literary and dramatic content, Eisenstein taught the technicalities of directing, photography, and editing, while encouraging his students' development of individuality, expressiveness, and creativity. [80] Eisenstein's pedagogy, like his films, was politically charged and contained quotes from Vladimir Lenin interwoven with his teaching. [81]

In his initial films, Eisenstein did not use professional actors. His narratives eschewed individual characters and addressed broad social issues, especially class conflict. He used stock characters, and the roles were filled with untrained people from the appropriate classes; he avoided casting stars. [82] Eisenstein's vision of communism brought him into conflict with officials in the ruling regime of Stalin. Like many Bolshevik artists, Eisenstein envisioned a new society which would subsidize artists totally,[ citation needed ] freeing them from the confines of bosses and budgets, leaving them absolutely free to create, but budgets and producers were as significant to the Soviet film industry as the rest of the world. Due to the fledgling war, the revolution-wracked and isolated new nation didn't have the resources to nationalize its film industry at first. When it did, limited resources—both monetary and equipment—required production controls as extensive as in the capitalist world.[ citation needed ]

Honours and awards



In Russian, and available online

Related Research Articles

Cinema of the Soviet Union Film history of the Soviet Union

The cinema of the Soviet Union includes films produced by the constituent republics of the Soviet Union reflecting elements of their pre-Soviet culture, language and history, albeit they were all regulated by the central government in Moscow. Most prolific in their republican films, after the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, were Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Ukraine, and, to a lesser degree, Lithuania, Belarus and Moldavia. At the same time, the nation's film industry, which was fully nationalized throughout most of the country's history, was guided by philosophies and laws propounded by the monopoly Soviet Communist Party which introduced a new view on the cinema, socialist realism, which was different from the one before or after the existence of the Soviet Union.

<i>Battleship Potemkin</i> 1925 film directed by Sergei Eisenstein

Battleship Potemkin, sometimes rendered as Battleship Potyomkin, is a 1925 Soviet silent film directed by Sergei Eisenstein and produced by Mosfilm. It presents a dramatized version of the mutiny that occurred in 1905 when the crew of the Russian battleship Potemkin rebelled against its officers.

<i>October: Ten Days That Shook the World</i> 1927 film by Sergei Eisenstein, Grigori Aleksandrov

October: Ten Days That Shook the World is a 1928 Soviet silent historical film by Sergei Eisenstein and Grigori Aleksandrov. It is a celebratory dramatization of the 1917 October Revolution commissioned for the tenth anniversary of the event. Originally released as October in the Soviet Union, the film was re-edited and released internationally as Ten Days That Shook The World, after John Reed's popular book on the Revolution.

<i>Alexander Nevsky</i> (film) 1938 film by Sergei Eisenstein

Alexander Nevsky is a 1938 historical drama film directed by Sergei Eisenstein. It depicts the attempted invasion of Novgorod in the 13th century by the Teutonic Knights of the Holy Roman Empire and their defeat by Prince Alexander, known popularly as Alexander Nevsky (1220–1263).

Vsevolod Pudovkin Soviet film director, screenwriter and actor

Vsevolod Illarionovich Pudovkin was a Russian and Soviet film director, screenwriter and actor who developed influential theories of montage. Pudovkin's masterpieces are often contrasted with those of his contemporary Sergei Eisenstein, but whereas Eisenstein utilized montage to glorify the power of the masses, Pudovkin preferred to concentrate on the courage and resilience of individuals. He was granted the title of People's Artist of the USSR in 1948.

Nikolay Cherkasov Soviet actor

Nikolay Konstantinovich Cherkasov was a Soviet and Russian actor. People's Artist of the USSR (1947).

Boris Shumyatsky Soviet film producer

Boris Zakharovich Shumyatsky was the de facto executive producer for the Soviet film monopoly from 1930 to 1937. He was executed as a traitor in 1938, following a "purge" of the Soviet film industry, and much information about him was expunged from the public record as a consequence.

<i>Ivan the Terrible</i> (1944 film) 1944 two-part film by Sergei Eisenstein

Ivan the Terrible is a two-part historical epic film about Ivan IV of Russia, written and directed by the filmmaker Sergei Eisenstein. It was commissioned by Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin, who admired and identified himself with Ivan.

Pavel Kadochnikov Soviet actor, film director and screenwriter

Pavel Petrovich Kadochnikov was a Soviet actor, film director and screenwriter. Among other notable roles he played in the film Ivan the Terrible, directed by Sergei Eisenstein. He received the Stalin Prize three times, was named a People's Artist of the USSR (1979) and a Hero of Socialist Labour (1985).

<i>Strike</i> (1925 film) 1924 film by Sergei Eisenstein

Strike is a 1925 silent film made in the Soviet Union by Sergei Eisenstein. It was Eisenstein's first full-length feature film, and he would go on to make The Battleship Potemkin later that year. It was acted by the Proletcult Theatre, and composed of six parts. It was in turn, intended to be one part of a seven-part series, entitled Towards Dictatorship, that was left unfinished. Eisenstein's influential essay, Montage of Attractions was written between Strike's production and premiere.

Eisenstein on Disney is a 1986 book edited by film critic Jay Leyda that collects and reprints the various literature that Sergei Eisenstein produced about Walt Disney. Eisenstein composed the majority of the text in 1941 after his introduction to the Hollywood culture industry. It was published much later than most of Leyda's other seminal works on Eisenstein and it presents a unique side of this highly theoretical Soviet film director who is an outsider to American pop culture.

Jay Leyda was an American avant-garde filmmaker and film historian, noted for his work on U.S, Soviet, and Chinese cinema, as well as his documentatary compilations on the day-to-day lives of Herman Melville and Emily Dickinson.

<i>Bezhin Meadow</i> 1937 film by Sergei Eisenstein

Bezhin Meadow is a 1937 Soviet film famous for having been suppressed and believed destroyed before its completion. Directed by Sergei Eisenstein, it tells the story of a young farm boy whose father attempts to betray the government for political reasons by sabotaging the year's harvest and the son's efforts to stop his own father to protect the Soviet state, culminating in the boy's murder and a social uprising. The film draws its title from a story by Ivan Turgenev, but is based on the life of Pavlik Morozov, a young Russian boy who became a political martyr following his death in 1932, after he denounced his father to Soviet government authorities and subsequently died at the hands of his family. Pavlik Morozov was immortalized in school programs, poetry, music, and in film.

Parvo (camera) 35mm motion picture camera

The Parvo was a 35mm motion picture camera developed in France by André Debrie. The patent was registered in 1908 by his father, Joseph Dules Debrie. The camera was relatively compact for its time. It was hand-cranked, as were its predecessors. To aid the camera operator in cranking at the correct speed, the camera had a built in tachometer.

Eduard Tisse Soviet cinematographer

Eduard Kazimirovich Tisse was a Soviet cinematographer.

Ivan Pyryev Soviet film director and screenwriter

Ivan Aleksandrovich Pyryev was a Soviet-Russian film director and screenwriter remembered as the high priest of Stalinist cinema. He was awarded six Stalin Prizes, served as Director of the Mosfilm studios (1954–57) and was, for a time, the most influential man in the Soviet motion picture industry.

<i>¡Que viva México!</i> film project begun in 1930 directed by Sergei Eisenstein

¡Que viva México! is a film project begun in 1930 by the Russian avant-garde director Sergei Eisenstein (1898–1948). It would have been an episodic portrayal of Mexican culture and politics from pre-Conquest civilization to the Mexican revolution. Production was beset by difficulties and was eventually abandoned. Jay Leyda and Zina Voynow call it Eisentein's "greatest film plan and his greatest personal tragedy".

Grigori Aleksandrov Soviet film director (1903-1983)

Grigori Vasilyevich Aleksandrov or Alexandrov was a prominent Soviet film director who was named a People's Artist of the USSR in 1947 and a Hero of Socialist Labor in 1973. He was awarded the Stalin Prizes for 1941 and 1950.

Alexander Dovzhenko Soviet filmmaker

Alexander Petrovich Dovzhenko or Oleksander Petrovych Dovzhenko, was a Soviet screenwriter, film producer and director. He is often cited as one of the most important early Soviet filmmakers, alongside Sergei Eisenstein, Dziga Vertov, and Vsevolod Pudovkin, as well as being a pioneer of Soviet montage theory.

Pyotr Pavlenko Soviet writer and screenwriter

Pyotr Andreyevich Pavlenko, , was a Soviet writer, screenwriter and war correspondent. He became a member of the CPSU in 1920.


  2. "Sergei Eisenstein – Russian film director and film theorist. Biography and interesting facts".
  3. Роман Соколов, Анна Сухорукова «Новые данные о предках Сергея Михайловича Эйзенштейна»: «Киноведческие записки» 102/103, 2013; стр. 314—323.
  4. Эйзенштейн 1968
  5. Bordwell 1993 , p. 1
  6. Seton 1952 , p. 19
  7. Seton 1952 , p. 20
  8. Seton 1952 , p. 22
  9. Al LaValley (2001). Eisenstein at 100. Rutgers University Press. p.  70. ISBN   9780813529714. As a committed Marxist, Eisenstein outwardly turned his back on his Orthodox upbringing, and took pains in his memoirs to stress his atheism.
  10. Sergei Eisenstein (1996). Richard Taylor (ed.). Beyond the stars: the memoirs of Sergei Eisenstein, Volume 5. BFI Publishing. p. 414. ISBN   9780851704609. My atheism is like that of Anatole France -- inseparable from adoration of the visible forms of a cult.
  11. Seton 1952 , p. 28
  12. Seton 1952 , pp. 34–35
  13. Seton 1952 , p. 35
  14. Эйзенштейн 1968
  15. Seton 1952 , p. 37
  16. Seton 1952 , p. 41
  17. Seton 1952 , p. 529
  18. Seton 1952 , pp. 46–48
  19. Seton 1952 , p. 61
  20. Christie & Taylor 1994 , pp. 87–89
  21. Эйзенштейн 1968
  22. Goodwin 1993 , p. 32
  23. "Socialist Realism | art". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-01-22.
  24. Eisenstein 1972 , p. 8
  25. Bordwell 1993 , p. 16
  26. Geduld & Gottesman 1970 , p. 12
  27. Montagu 1968 , p. 151
  28. Seton 1952 , p. 172
  29. Seton 1952 , p. 174
  30. Montagu 1968 , p. 209
  31. Seton 1952 , p. 167
  32. Seton 1952 , pp. 185–186
  33. Montagu 1968 , pp. 89–97
  34. Seton 1952 , p. 187
  35. Seton 1952 , p. 188
  36. Seton 1952 , p. 189
  37. 1 2 3 Geduld & Gottesman 1970 , p. 22
  38. Geduld & Gottesman 1970 , p. 23
  39. Bordwell 1993 , p. 19
  40. Left of Hollywood: Cinema, Modernism, and the Emergence of U.S. Radical Film Culture
  41. Seton 1952 , p. 513
  42. 1 2 Geduld & Gottesman 1970 , p. 281
  43. Eisenstein 1972 , p. 14
  44. Geduld & Gottesman 1970 , p. 132
  45. Seton 1952 , pp. 234–235
  46. Geduld & Gottesman 1970 , pp. 309–310
  47. 1 2 Geduld & Gottesman 1970 , p. 288
  48. Bordwell 1993 , p. 21
  49. Seton 1952 , p. 446
  50. Seton 1952 , p. 280
  51. Leyda 1960 , p. 299
  52. Bordwell 1993 , p. 140
  53. Seton 1952 , p. 369
  54. González Cueto, Irene (2016-05-23). "Warhol, Prokofiev, Eisenstein y la música – Cultural Resuena". Cultural Resuena (in Spanish). Retrieved 2016-10-12.
  55. 1 2 Bordwell 1993 , p. 27
  56. 1 2 Bordwell 1993 , p. 28
  57. Kevin McKenna. 2009. "Proverbs and the Folk Tale in the Russian Cinema: The Case of Sergei Eisenstein's Film Classic Aleksandr Nevsky." The Proverbial «Pied Piper» A Festschrift Volume of Essays in Honor of Wolfgang Mieder on the Occasion of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday, ed. by Kevin McKenna, pp. 277–92. New York, Bern: Peter Lang.
  58. Leyda & Voynow 1982 , p. 146
  59. Neuberger 2003 , p. 22
  60. Leyda & Voynow 1982 , p. 135
  61. Blois, Beverly. "Eisenstein's "Ivan The Terrible, Part II" as Cultural Artifact" (PDF).
  62. Bordwell 1993 , p. 33
  63. "Pera Atasheva" (in Russian). Retrieved 22 January 2018.
  65. Neuberger 2003 , p. 23
  66. Cavendish, Richard. "The Death of Sergei Eisenstein" . Retrieved 24 March 2014.
  67. Eisenstein 1949 , p. 72
  68. Eisenstein 1949 , p. 73
  69. Eisenstein 1949 , p. 75
  70. Eisenstein 1949 , p. 78
  71. Eisenstein 1949 , p. 82
  72. Nizhniĭ 1962 , p. 93
  73. Nizhniĭ 1962 , p. 3
  74. Nizhniĭ 1962 , p. 21
  75. Leyda & Voynow 1982 , p. 74
  76. Nizhniĭ 1962 , pp. 148–155
  77. Nizhniĭ 1962 , p. 143
  78. Seton 1952 , p. 185
  79. 1 2 Neuberger, Joan (2003). Ivan the Terrible: The Film Companion. I.B.Tauris. pp. 2, 9. ISBN   9781860645600 . Retrieved 22 January 2018.
  80. Hincks, Joseph (21 January 2018). "Google Doodle Celebrates the Films of Sergei Eisenstein". Time. Retrieved 22 January 2018.



Filmed biographies

Further reading