Sisters in Law (book)

Last updated
Sisters in Law
Sisters In Law Book Cover.jpg
Author Linda Hirshman
Audio read by Andrea Gallo
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SubjectLegal Feminism
GenreNon-fiction
Publisher Harper
Publication date
September 1, 2015

Sisters in Law: How Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Went to the Supreme Court and Changed the World is a 2015 non-fiction book by Linda Hirshman. The book examines the legal careers and judicial records of Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the first and second women appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Contents

Synopsis

The book follows the careers and backgrounds of the first two women to serve on the Supreme Court of the United StatesSandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg — and attempts to situate their respective biographies, ascent to the court, and judicial records within the broader context of the women's rights movement. Both women met with sexist challenges to their continued careers upon graduating from law school in the 1950s, but O'Connor acceded to the conservative values of putting her family first, and rose to power within Arizona's Republican Party mostly as a volunteer and socialite, until taking the reins as appointed majority leader in the Arizona State Senate. Ginsburg, with the support of her successful tax-attorney husband, chose the parallel routes of academia and activism, founding and heading the American Civil Liberties Union's Women's Rights Project. In this project, she sought to promote cases that would eradicate any formal inequalities between men and women, focusing to a great degree on challenging laws providing benefits to women, which she saw as promoting stereotypes of women as weak and incapable of independent action.

According to Hirshman's analysis, the two women used both their judicial skills and court politics to promote women's rights, though in different ways, as O'Connor remained a staunch Republican and Ginsburg was a classic liberal. Hirshman surveys major cases to prove her thesis that both women justices contributed to massive changes in women's rights, especially lauding Ginsburg, whom she compares with Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Jane Austen: “Mozart had, by many accounts, five operatic masterpieces. Jane Austen’s reputation rests on five novels. . . . In five landmark cases over less than a decade, [Ginsburg] largely transformed the constitutional status of women in America.” [1] [2]

Hirshman also focuses on the relationship between the two justices, using as an example the Virginia Military Institute case, United States v. Virginia , which struck down the long-standing male-only admission policy of the school, and is widely considered "the jewel in the crown" of Ginsburg's majority opinions. As the senior justice, O'Connor could have written the opinion, but in an act of generosity, demurred, saying, "This should be Ruth's." [2] [3]

Background

Author Linda Hirshman is a lawyer, philosopher and cultural historian, whose focus is on social movements such as the struggle against sexual and gender violence, gay rights and women's rights. As a lawyer, she focused mostly on labor law, appearing before the Supreme Court in three cases (one win, one loss and one draw), including Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority , a landmark case in which the Court held that the Congress has the power under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution to extend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which requires that employers provide minimum wage and overtime pay to their employees, to state and local governments. [4]

Hirshman has also been a professor of philosophy and women's studies at Brandeis University, professor of law at Chicago-Kent College of Law, and visiting professor at Northwestern Law School. Hirshman received a PhD in Philosophy from University of Illinois Chicago, a Juris Doctor from University of Chicago Law School and a Bachelor of Arts from Cornell University.

Reception

Sisters in Law became a bestseller, appearing on The New York Times and The Washington Post bestseller lists.

Critical reception

According to The New York Times critic Linda Greenhouse, "There is a fascinating book struggling to emerge from the narrative structure Linda Hirshman has imposed on rich material." [5] She notes that Hirshman is an obvious admirer of Ginsburg, but is less sure how to present conservative O'Connor as a champion of women's rights, which is the thesis of the book, ultimately settling for describing her strategy as one of defense, in which "she would not permit the courts to roll the equality ball backward," while Ginsburg, for her part, "played offense," advocating for change.

Kirkus Reviews called Sisters in Law "[a]n intelligent, evenhanded look at a changing society and its legal foundations." [6] Publishers Weekly gave the book a positive review, citing in particular "the unusual step of addressing the influence that Supreme Court law clerks can have on the Court’s decision-making," and the "quality time" Hirshman spends "discussing the evolution of the constitutional theories that the justices apply when analyzing such flash-point issues as reproductive rights and workplace sexual harassment." The review also lauds "Hirshman’s conversational style and deep analysis of several precedent-setting constitutional cases [that] should appeal to both casual and professional readers. [7]

In 2019 a play premiered based on the book, also called Sisters in Law. The book was adapted for the stage by playwright Jonathan Shapiro, and Patricia McGregor directed. [8] Tovah Feldshuh portrayed Ginsburg, and Stephanie Faracy portrayed O'Connor. The Hollywood Reporter deemed that the timing of the production was perfect, given that "the conundrum of the #MeToo era is that even while women are being empowered with agency, they're still making only 79 cents on the dollar compared to men, reproductive rights are being quietly scaled back and a Supreme Court justice with sexual assault charges leveled against him was seated without a thorough investigation." [9] The review found the production to be visually strong, and intelligently rendered, as the two characters relitigate major cases that marked their respective careers. However, the review also found that "Sisters in Law's greatest deficiency is that it's all head and no heart." [9]

According to the Los Angeles Times , the dialog of the play is engaging, marked by "beautifully paced and illuminating banter", and positively noted the performances, costume design and set design. [8] Notwithstanding the general praise of the review, reviewer Margaret Gray nevertheless finds that the play oversimplifies two complex characters, and disapproves of some of the techniques used to make the spectator expect that what occurs on stage is close to what happened in reality, an expectation not delivered in the production. [8]

Publication history

United States:

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sandra Day O'Connor</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1981 to 2006

Sandra Day O'Connor is an American lawyer, former politician, and jurist who served as the first female associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1981 to 2006. She was both the first woman nominated and the first confirmed to the court. A moderate conservative, O'Connor was known for her precisely researched opinions. Nominated by President Ronald Reagan, she was considered a swing vote for the Rehnquist Court and the first four months of the Roberts Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1993 to 2020

Joan Ruth Bader Ginsburg was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1993 until her death in 2020. She was nominated by President Bill Clinton to replace retiring justice Byron White, and at the time was viewed as a moderate consensus-builder. Ginsburg was the first Jewish woman and the second woman to serve on the Court, after Sandra Day O'Connor. During her tenure, Ginsburg authored the majority opinions in cases such as United States v. Virginia (1996), Olmstead v. L.C. (1999), Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. (2000), and City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York (2005). Later in her tenure, Ginsburg received attention for passionate dissents that reflected liberal views of the law. She was dubbed "the Notorious R.B.G.", a moniker she later embraced.

Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the administrators of estates cannot be named in a way that discriminates between sexes. In Reed v. Reed the Supreme Court ruled for the first time that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibited differential treatment based on sex.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nina Totenberg</span> American journalist (born 1944)

Nina Totenberg is an American legal affairs correspondent for National Public Radio (NPR) focusing primarily on the activities and politics of the Supreme Court of the United States. Her reports air regularly on NPR's news magazines All Things Considered, Morning Edition, and Weekend Edition. From 1992 to 2013, she was also a panelist on the syndicated TV political commentary show Inside Washington.

United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States struck down the long-standing male-only admission policy of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) in a 7–1 decision. Justice Clarence Thomas, whose son was enrolled at the university at the time, recused himself.

Linda Redlick Hirshman is an American lawyer, pundit, and the author of multiple books on the law, women's studies, and philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roberts Court</span> Period of the US Supreme Court since 2005

The Roberts Court is the time since 2005 during which the Supreme Court of the United States has been led by John Roberts as Chief Justice. Roberts succeeded William Rehnquist as Chief Justice after the latter's death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2003 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down seven per curiam opinions during its 2003 term, which began October 6, 2003 and concluded October 3, 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rehnquist Court</span> Period of the US Supreme Court from 1986 to 2005

The Rehnquist Court was the period in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States during which William Rehnquist served as Chief Justice. Rehnquist succeeded Warren Burger as Chief Justice after the latter's retirement, and Rehnquist held this position until his death in 2005, at which point John Roberts was nominated and confirmed as Rehnquist's replacement. The Rehnquist Court is generally considered to be more conservative than the preceding Burger Court, but not as conservative as the succeeding Roberts Court. According to Jeffrey Rosen, Rehnquist combined an amiable nature with great organizational skill, and he "led a Court that put the brakes on some of the excesses of the Earl Warren era while keeping pace with the sentiments of a majority of the country."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Erwin Griswold</span> American lawyer (1904–1994)

Erwin Nathaniel Griswold was an American appellate attorney and legal scholar who argued many cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. Griswold served as Solicitor General of the United States (1967–1973) under Presidents Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard M. Nixon. He also served as the dean of Harvard Law School for 21 years. Several times he was considered for appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court. During a career that spanned more than six decades, he served as member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and as president of the American Bar Foundation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Burger Court</span> Period of the US Supreme Court from 1969 to 1986

The Burger Court was the period in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1969 to 1986, when Warren Burger served as Chief Justice of the United States. Burger succeeded Earl Warren as Chief Justice after the latter's retirement, and served as Chief Justice until his retirement, at which point William Rehnquist was nominated and confirmed as Burger's replacement. The Burger Court is generally considered to be the last liberal court to date. It has been described as a "transitional" court, due to its transition from having the liberal rulings of the Warren Court to the conservative rulings of the Rehnquist Court.

<i>My Own Words</i> 2016 book by Ruth Bader Ginsburg

My Own Words is a 2016 book by American Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her biographers Mary Hartnett and Wendy W. Williams. The book is a collection of Bader Ginsburg's speeches and writings dating back to the eighth grade. It was Bader Ginsburg's first book since becoming a Supreme Court Justice in 1993.

Malvina French Shanklin Harlan (1839–1916), informally known as "Mallie", was the wife of U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan, the grandmother of Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan II, and the author of a 1915 memoir entitled Some Memories of a Long Life, 1854–1911. Her memoir remained unpublished until 2001, when it was published at the instigation of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

<i>On the Basis of Sex</i> 2018 film by Mimi Leder

On the Basis of Sex is a 2018 American biographical legal drama film based on the life and early cases of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was the second woman to serve as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. Directed by Mimi Leder and written by Daniel Stiepleman, it stars Felicity Jones as Ginsburg. Armie Hammer, Justin Theroux, Jack Reynor, Cailee Spaeny, Sam Waterston, and Kathy Bates feature in supporting roles.

Califano v. Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the different treatment of men and women mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 402(f)(1)(D) constituted invidious discrimination against female wage earners by affording them less protection for their surviving spouses than is provided to male employees, and therefore violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case was brought by a widower who was denied survivor benefits on the grounds that he had not been receiving at least one-half support from his wife when she died. Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the court, ruling unconstitutional the provision of the Social Security Act which set forth a gender-based distinction between widows and widowers, whereby Social Security Act survivors benefits were payable to a widower only if he was receiving at least half of his support from his late wife, while such benefits based on the earnings of a deceased husband were payable to his widow regardless of dependency. The Court found that this distinction deprived female wage earners of the same protection that a similarly situated male worker would have received, violating due process and equal protection.

<i>RBG</i> (film) 2018 American film

RBG is a 2018 American documentary film focusing on the life and career of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the second female Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States after Sandra Day O'Connor. After premiering at the 2018 Sundance Film Festival, the film was released in the United States on May 4, 2018. The film was directed and produced by Betsy West and Julie Cohen.

Scalia/Ginsburg is a 2015 comic opera by composer-librettist Derrick Wang about the relationship between United States Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Called "a dream come true" by Justice Ginsburg, the opera has been broadcast nationally on the radio in the United States, produced in the United States and internationally, and featured on Live with Carnegie Hall.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Death and state funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg</span> 2020 death of a US Supreme Court justice

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, died from complications of metastatic pancreatic cancer on September 18, 2020, at the age of 87. Her death received immediate and significant public attention; a vigil at the Supreme Court plaza in Washington, D.C., was held that same evening. Memorials and vigils were held in several U.S. cities, including Chicago, New York City, and San Francisco.

<i>Ruth: Justice Ginsburg in Her Own Words</i> 2019 American film

Ruth: Justice Ginsburg in Her Own Words is an 2019 American documentary film, directed and produced by Freida Lee Mock, written by Mock and M.A. Golán. It follows Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the second female Supreme Court of the United States Associate Justice.

References

  1. Howe, Amy (21 September 2015). "Book review: Linda Hirshman's Sisters in Law". Howe on the Court. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
  2. 1 2 Hirshman, Linda (September 1, 2015). Sisters in Law: How Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Went to the Supreme Court and Changed the World. Harper. ISBN   978-0062238467.
  3. Nina Totenberg. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg And Sandra Day O'Connor, 'Sisters In Law'". NPR.org. Archived from the original on March 20, 2022. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
  4. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority , 469 U.S. 528 (1985). PD-icon.svg This article incorporates public domain material from this U.S government document.
  5. Greenhouse, Linda (14 September 2015). "'Sisters in Law' Looks at Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Published 2015)". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
  6. "Sisters in Law". Kirkus Reviews. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
  7. "Nonfiction Book Review: Sisters in Law: How Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Went to the Supreme Court and Changed the World by Linda Hirshman. Harper, $28.99 (416p) ISBN 978-0-06-223846-7". Publishers Weekly. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
  8. 1 2 3 Gray, Margaret (1 October 2019). "Review: Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sandra Day O'Connor, the stage show, in 'Sisters in Law'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
  9. 1 2 Reife, Jordan (28 September 2019). "'Sisters in Law': Theater Review | Hollywood Reporter". Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 7 October 2020.