Slavery among the indigenous peoples of the Americas

Last updated

Painting by Jean-Baptiste Debret depicting bandeiras enslaving Guarani people in the Brazilian interior. Indian Soldiers from the Coritiba Province Escorting Native Prisoners.jpg
Painting by Jean-Baptiste Debret depicting bandeiras enslaving Guaraní people in the Brazilian interior.

Slavery among the indigenous peoples of the Americas refers to slavery of and by the indigenous peoples of the Americas. It began during the Pre-Columbian era, when many societies across both continents enslaved prisoners of war or instituted systems of forced labor. Contact with Europeans transformed these practices, as the Spanish introduced chattel slavery through warfare and the cooption of existing systems. [1] [2] Other European powers followed suit, and from the 15th through the 19th centuries, enslaved between two and five million people. [lower-alpha 1] [3] [4] It had a devastating impact on many indigenous societies, contributing to the systematic genocide of indigenous peoples. [5] After the decolonization of the Americas, the enslavement of indigenous peoples continued in the frontier regions of some countries, notably parts of Brazil, Northern Mexico, and the Southwestern United States. Some indigenous groups adopted European-style chattel slavery during the colonial period, most notably the "Five Civilized Tribes" in the United States. [6] Far more were involved in the selling of indigenous slaves to European buyers.


Pre-Columbian era

Slavery and related practices of forced labor varied greatly between regions and over time.

In this illustration from the Ramirez Codex, the three men in the background represent slaves who were sacrificed as part of the funeral rites for the Aztec Emperor Auitzotl. The Funeral Rites of Auitzotl WDL6755.png
In this illustration from the Ramírez Codex, the three men in the background represent slaves who were sacrificed as part of the funeral rites for the Aztec Emperor Auitzotl.

In Mesoamerica, the most common forms of slavery were those of prisoners of war and debtors. People unable to pay back debts could be sentenced to work as slaves to the persons owed until the debts were worked off. The Mayan [7] [8] and Aztec [9] civilizations both practiced slavery. Warfare was important to Maya society, because raids on surrounding areas provided the victims required for human sacrifice, as well as slaves for the construction of temples. [10] Most victims of human sacrifice were prisoners of war or slaves. [11] Slavery was not usually hereditary; children of slaves were born free.

In the Inca Empire, workers were subject to a Mit'a in lieu of taxes which they paid by working for the government. [12] Each ayllu , or extended family, would decide which family member to send to do the work. It is debated whether this system of forced labor counts as slavery.

Many of the indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast, such as the Haida and Tlingit, were traditionally known as fierce warriors and slave-traders, raiding as far as California. [13] [14] [15] Slavery was hereditary, the slaves being prisoners of war. Their targets often included members of the Coast Salish groups. Among some tribes about a quarter of the population were slaves. [16] [17] One slave narrative was composed by an Englishman, John R. Jewitt, who had been taken alive when his ship was captured in 1802; his memoir provides a detailed look at life as a slave, and asserts that a large number were held.

Other slave-owning societies and tribes of the New World included the Tehuelche of Patagonia, the Kalinago of Dominica, the Tupinambá of Brazil, and the Pawnee of the Great Plains. [18] [19] [20]

European enslavement of indigenous peoples

European enslavement of indigenous Americans began with the Spanish colonization of the Caribbean. In Christopher Columbus's letter to Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand of Spain describing the native Taíno, he remarks that "They ought to make good and skilled servants" [21] and "these people are very simple in war-like matters... I could conquer the whole of them with 50 men, and govern them as I pleased". [22] The Catholic Monarchs initially rejected Columbus' enthusiasm for the slave trade. [23] But although they issued a decree in 1500 that specifically forbade the enslavement of indigenous people, they allowed three exceptions which were freely abused by colonial Spanish authorities: slaves taken in "just wars"; those purchased from other indigenous people; or those from groups alleged to practice cannibalism (such as the Kalinago). [4]

As other European colonial powers joined the Spanish, the practice of indigenous enslavement was expanded. The new international market for staple products like tobacco, sugar, and raw materials incentivized the creation of extraction- and plantation-based economies in colonies such as English Carolina, Spanish Florida, and (Lower) French Louisiana. At first, these employed the labor of enslaved people of mostly indigenous origins. [24] Among indigenous groups themselves, European influence greatly changed practices of slavery. [1] [2] Rather than integrating war captives into their own societies, they sold them to the Europeans. This created a vicious cycle of population decline, destructive wars, and an ever-weaker position compared with the Europeans. [lower-alpha 2] [25] [1] [2] [26] By the mid eighteenth century, population decline, frequent rebellions, and the availability of African slaves had caused a shift away from the large-scale enslavement of indigenous peoples. Although it would be continued on the frontiers, in the economic cores of settler societies indigenous slaves would be replaced with those of African origin.

Spainish colonies

Engraving of Spaniards enslaving indigenous Peruvians by Theodor de Bry. Native American slaves.jpg
Engraving of Spaniards enslaving indigenous Peruvians by Theodor de Bry.

By 1499, Spanish settlers on Hispaniola had discovered gold in the Cordillera Central. [27] This created a demand for large amounts of cheap labor, and an estimated 400,000 Taíno people from across the island were soon enslaved to work in gold mines. [28] As discussed above, this practice of enslaving native peoples was immediately but ineffectually opposed by the Spanish Crown. Succeeding governors were appointed and recalled, often because of stories about their treatment of native populations. [29] The Taíno people also resisted fiercely and had to be put down in a series of brutal massacres. [30] Nonetheless, forced labor continued and was institutionalized as the encomienda system during the first decade of the 16th century. [31] Under this system, private Spanish colonizers (encomenderos) were granted the right to the labor of groups of non-Christian indigenous people. [32] Although based on similar grants given during the Reconquista in Spain, in the Caribbean the system quickly became indistinguishable from the slavery it replaced [5] By 1508, the original Taíno population of 400,000 or more had been reduced to around 60,000. [28] Spanish slave-raiding parties travelled across the Caribbean and "carried off entire populations" to work their colonies. [33] Although disease is often pointed to as the cause of this population decline, the first recorded smallpox outbreak in the New World was not until 1518. [34] Historian Andrés Reséndez at the University of California, Davis asserts that even though disease was a factor, the indigenous population of Hispaniola would have rebounded the same way Europeans did following the Black Death if it were not for the constant enslavement they were subject to. [4] He says that "among these human factors, slavery was the major killer" of Hispaniola's population, and that "between 1492 and 1550, a nexus of slavery, overwork and famine killed more natives in the Caribbean than smallpox, influenza or malaria." [35] By 1521, the islands of the northern Caribbean were largely depopulated. [4]

Cover of the New Laws of 1542 Leyes Nuevas1.jpg
Cover of the New Laws of 1542

Members of the Spanish religious and legal professions were especially vocal in opposing the enslavement of native peoples. [36] The first speech in the Americas for the universality of human rights and against the abuses of slavery was given on Hispaniola, a mere nineteen years after the first contact. [37] Resistance to indigenous captivity in the Spanish colonies produced the first modern debates over the legitimacy of slavery. Friar Bartolomé de Las Casas, author of A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies, publicized the conditions of indigenous Americans and lobbied Charles V to guarantee their rights. [lower-alpha 3] The Spanish progressively restricted and outright forbade the enslavement of indigenous Americans in the early years of the Spanish Empire with the Laws of Burgos of 1512 and the New Laws of 1542. The latter replaced the encomienda with the repartimiento system, making the indigenous people (in theory) free vassals of the Spanish Crown. [38] Under repartimiento, Amerindians were paid wages for their work, but the work was still obligatory and still carried out under the supervision of a Spanish conquistador. [39] Legally, these labor obligations were not allowed to interfere with the Amerindians' own survival, with only 7-10% of the adult male population allowed to be assigned to work at any time. [40] The implementation of the New Laws and liberation of tens of thousands of indigenous Americans led to a number of rebellions and conspiracies by encomenderos which had to be put down by the Spanish crown. [41] Las Casas' writings gave rise to Spanish Black Legend , which Charles Gibson describes as "the accumulated tradition of propaganda and Hispanophobia according to which the Spanish Empire is regarded as cruel, bigoted, degenerate, exploitative and self-righteous in excess of reality". [42] [43] In later centuries, this would be used by other colonial powers to justify their own treatment of native populations as being at least superior to the Spanish alternative.

Despite being technically illegal, indigenous slavery continued in Spanish America for centuries. While the courts were instructed to "put special care in the good treatment and conservation of the Indians... Spanish masters resorted to slight changes in terminology, gray areas, and subtle reinterpretations to continue to hold Indians in bondage." [4] In Spain itself, the use of indigenous slaves did not end until the early 1600s. Spanish movement north after discovery of vast deposits of silver resulted in the "just" Mixtón and Chichimeca Wars, enslaving of thousands of people. Evem further north, Franciscan missions were granted ten years of labor from surrounding peoples, but in practice maintained them in perpetual servitude. [44] [45] Slavery was a major cause of the Pueblo Revolt of 1680 and other unrest among the indigenous people of northern Mexico. Following the revolt, the business of providing enslaved people for the New Mexico market passed into the hands of the Navajo, Utes, Comanches, and Apaches. When the market for slaves began to dry up in the early 18th century, the surplus and ex-slaves settled in New Mexico, forming communities of so-called Genízaros. [4] In 1672, Mariana of Austria freed the enslaved indigenous people of Mexico. [46] On 12 June 1679, Charles II issued a general declaration freeing all indigenous slaves in Spanish America. In 1680 this was included in the Recopilación de las leyes de Indias, a codification of the laws of Spanish America. [47] The Kalinago, "cannibals," were the only exception. [48] The royal anti-slavery crusade did not end the enslavement of indigenous people in Spain's American possessions, but, in addition to resulting in the freeing of thousands of enslaved people, it ended the involvement and facilitation by government officials of enslaving by the Spanish; purchase of slaves remained possible but only from indigenous enslavers such as the Kalina or the Comanches. [49] [4]

Cerro Rico in the town of Potosi was the most important source of silver in South America, and in all of Spanish America until Guanajuato in Mexico surpassed it in the 18th century. Old Potosi.jpg
Cerro Rico in the town of Potosí was the most important source of silver in South America, and in all of Spanish America until Guanajuato in Mexico surpassed it in the 18th century.

In the Viceroyalty of Peru, the repartimiento system was particularly harsh. [50] The colonial government repurposed the Inca mit'a system under their own administration. For over two centuries, thirteen thousand mitayos were forcefully conscripted every year to work in the silver mines of Potosí, Caylloma, and Huancavelica. [4] [51] Mitayos were forced to carry backbreaking loads in extreme conditions from the depths of the mine up to the surface. [52] [53] Falls, accidents, and illnesses (including mercury poisoning from the refinement process) were all commonplace. [54] [53] To avoid the repartimiento, thousands fled their traditional villages and forfeited their ayllu land rights. From the 16th to late 17th centuries, Upper Peru lost nearly 50% of its indigenous population. [55] This only increased the burden on the remaining natives, and by the 1600s, up to half of the eligible male population (as opposed to the repartimiento's original 7-10%) might find themselves working at Potosí in any given year. Laborers were paid, but the pay was dismal: just the cost of traveling to Potosí and back could be more than a mitayo was paid in a year, and so many of them chose to remain in Potosí as wage workers when their service was finished. [56] [39]

In Chile, Spanish occupation of the lands of the Mapuche was vigorously contested for 3 centuries in the Arauco War. In 1608, shortly after the war began, Philip III formally lifted the prohibition on indigenous slavery for Mapuches caught in war, legalizing what had already become common practice. [57] [58] Legalization made Spanish slave raiding increasingly common, and Mapuche slaves were exported north to places such as La Serena and Lima in Peru. [59] [58] These raids were an underlying cause of the large Mapuche uprising of 1655. [60] The uprising continued for an entire decade, and led Philip III's successor Philip IV to change course. [61] [62] Although he died without freeing the slaves outright, his successors would continue his policy towards abolition. [63] Mariana of Austria, serving as regent, freed all the indigenous slaves in Peru who had been captured in Chile. [46] After receiving a plea from the Pope, she also freed the slaves of the southern Andes. [64] On 12 June 1679, Charles II issued a general declaration freeing all indigenous slaves in Spanish America. But despite these royal decrees, little changed in reality. There was strong resistance from local elites, such as Governor Juan Enríquez who simply refused to publish Charles II's decrees. [4]

French colonies

Illustation of a Meskwaki slave, circa 1732 Slave Of Fox Indians In Illinois Country Or Nepissing Indians In French Colonial Canada.jpg
Illustation of a Meskwaki slave, circa 1732

Enslavement of indigenous peoples was practiced in New France from the 17th century. It played a less important role than in Spanish or British colonies because the economy centered on the fur trade with Iroquoian- and Algonquian-speaking peoples. [65] [66] But the metal weapons these groups acquired from trade were used to devastating effect against the Pawnee and Meskwaki further to the west, and captured slaves were sometimes gifted or traded back to the French. [67] [68] The name Panismahas , a subtribe of the Pawnee, likely became corrupted into a generic term for any slaves of indigenous origin in New France: Panis . [69] Enslavement of panis was formalized through colonial law in 1709, with the passage of the Ordinance Rendered on the Subject of the Negroes and the Indians called Panis. [70] Indigenous slaves could only be kept in bondage while they stayed within the colony, but in practice enslaved individuals remained enslaved regardless of where they travelled. [70] In 1747, the colonial administration proposed permitting the trade of First Nations slaves for slaves of African descent. However, these attempts were quashed by the French government, who feared it would jeopardize their strong relations with native tribes. [70] In Lower Louisiana and especially the French West Indies, planters generally preferred using African slaves, though in Louisiana some held panis as household servants. Thus Louis Antoine de Bougainville concluded in 1757 that the Panis played "the same role in America that the Negroes do in Europe."

The importation of panis began to decline in the decade prior to the 1760 Conquest of New France. [70] While the Articles of Capitulation of Montreal allowed the enslavement of First Nations people to continue, by the late-18th century it had largely been eclipsed by the Atlantic slave trade. [70] Historian Marcel Trudel has discovered 4,092 recorded enslaved people throughout Canadian history, of which 2,692 were indigenous, enslaved mostly by the French, and 1,400 Black people enslaved mostly by the British, together enslaved by about 1,400 enslavers. [71] Trudel also noted 31 marriages took place between French colonists and aboriginal slaves. [71]

British colonies

The massacre of the Pequot resulted in the enslavement of some of the survivors by English colonists. Pequot Enslaved.jpg
The massacre of the Pequot resulted in the enslavement of some of the survivors by English colonists.

During the 17th and 18th centuries, English colonists in New England frequently exported Native slaves to other mainland possessions as well as the "sugar islands" of the Caribbean. [72] [73] The source of slaves was mainly prisoners of war, including women and children. [74] [lower-alpha 4] [75] Yet the 1677 work The Doings and Sufferings of the Christian Indians documents how imprisoned members of English-allied forces were enslaved and sent to Caribbean destinations. [lower-alpha 5] [76] [77] [lower-alpha 6]

The enslavement and trafficking of indigenous American people was also practiced in the Province of Carolina, where historian Alan Gallay notes that during this period more slaves were exported from than imported to the major port of Charles Town. [4] [78] What set Carolina apart from the other English colonies on the Atlantic coast of North America was a substantial population of potential slaves in its hinterlands. [79] The superiority of English trade goods over that of the competing French and Spanish also played an important role in centralizing trade in Carolina. [80] Sometimes the colonists captured the slaves themselves, but more often bought them from native tribes who came to specialize in slave raids. One of the first of these was the Westo, followed by many others including the Yamasee, Chickasaw, and Muscogee. Traded goods, such as axes, bronze kettles, Caribbean rum, European jewelry, needles, and scissors, varied among the tribes, but the most prized were rifles. [81] The depletion of indigenous populations coupled with revolts (such as the Yamasee War) would eventually lead to Native Americans being replaced with African slaves in the colonial southeast. [82]

The exact number of Native Americans who were enslaved is unknown because vital statistics and census reports were at best infrequent. [83] Historian Alan Gallay estimates that from 1670 to 1715, British slave traders sold between 24,000 and 51,000 Native Americans from what is now the southern part of the U.S. [84] Andrés Reséndez estimates that between 147,000 and 340,000 Native Americans were enslaved in North America, excluding Mexico. [85] Even after the Indian Slave Trade ended in 1750 the enslavement of Native Americans continued in the west, and also in the Southern states mostly through kidnappings. [86] [44]

Portuguese Brazil

In Brazil, colonists were heavily dependent on indigenous labor during the initial phases of settlement to maintain the subsistence economy, and natives were often captured by expeditions called bandeiras ("Flags", from the flag of Portugal they carried in a symbolic claiming of new lands for the country). Bandeirantes frequently targeted Jesuit reductions, capturing thousands of natives from them in the early 1600s. [40] In 1629, Antônio Raposo Tavares led a bandeira, composed of 2,000 allied índios, "Indians", 900 mamelucos, "mestizos" and 69 whites, to find precious metals and stones and to capture Indians for slavery. This expedition alone was responsible for the enslavement of over 60,000 indigenous people. [87] [88] [89] [90] Conflict between settlers who wanted to enslave Indians and Jesuits who sought to protect them was common throughout the era, particularly as disease reduced the Indian populations. In 1661, for example, Padre António Vieira's attempts to protect native populations lead to an uprising and the temporary expulsion of the Jesuits in Maranhão and Pará. [40] The importation of African slaves began midway through the 16th century, but the enslavement of indigenous peoples continued well into the 19th century.

Indigenous slavery after colonial independence

United States

After the mid-1700s, it becomes more difficult to track the history of Native American enslavement in what became the United States outside of the territories that would be acquired from the Mexican-American War. Indian slavery had declined in scale significantly, and those that remained were not recorded or not distinguished from African slaves. [83] For example, in Rhode Island Sarah Chauqum was listed her as a mulatto, but she won her freedom by proving her Narragansett identity. [91] That said, records and slave narratives archived by the Works Progress Administration (WPA) clearly indicate that the enslavement of Native Americans continued in the 1800s, mostly through kidnappings. One example is a WPA interview with a former slave, Dennis Grant, whose mother was full-blooded Native American. [86] She was kidnapped as a child near Beaumont, Texas in the 1850s, made a slave, and later forced to become the wife of another enslaved person.

Southwestern states

Many Native Americans were enslaved during the California Genocide by American settlers. "Protecting The Settlers" Illustration by JR Browne for his work "The Indians Of California" 1864.jpg
Many Native Americans were enslaved during the California Genocide by American settlers.

The Mexican–American War brought large swathes of territory into the United States where Native American slavery was practiced at scale, and the states and territories created to govern these lands often legalized or expanded the practice. The Indian Act of 1850 sanctioned the enslavement of Native Americans in California under the guise of stopping vagrancy. [92] [44] The act "facilitated removing California Indians from their traditional lands, separating at least a generation of children and adults from their families, languages, and cultures...and indenturing Indian children and adults to Whites." [93] [94] Due to the nature of California court records, it is difficult to estimate of the number of Native Americans enslaved as a result of the legislation. Benjamin Madley places the number at somewhere between 24,000 to 27,000, including 4,000 to 7,000 children. [95] During the period the legislation was in effect, the Native Californian population of Los Angeles decreased from 3,693 to 219 people. Although the California legislature repealed parts of the statute after the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution abolished involuntary servitude in 1865, it was not repealed in its entirety until 1937. [96] [97]

Both debt peonage and Navajo slaveholding were well established in New Mexico when it became a territory. [98] Native American slaves were in the households of many prominent New Mexicans, including the governor and Kit Carson. [99] [100] Black slaves, in contrast, were vanishingly rare. [101] The Compromise of 1850 allowed New Mexico to choose its own stance on slavery, and in 1859, it was formally legalized. [102] This move was not without opposition: soon after the treaty had been signed, a group of prominent New Mexicans petitioned Congress to prevent slavery from being made legal. They were likely motivated by their desire for self-government and a fear of invasion by the slave state of Texas. [103] [104] On June 19, 1862, Congress prohibited slavery in all US territories. Prominent New Mexicans petitioned the Senate for compensation for the 600 Indian slaves that were going to be set free. [105] The Senate denied their request and sent federal agents to abolish slavery. But the years from 1864-1866 saw an expansion rather than a decline of Native American enslavement in New Mexico. This was a consequence of the Long Walk of the Navajo, during which the federal government organized some 53 separate death marches of Navajo from their land in what is now Arizona to eastern New Mexico. [106] [107] Taking advantage of their vulnerable position, Mexican and Ute enslavers captured many Navajo and sold them as slaves in places as far away as Conejos County, Colorado. [4] [108] [109] [110] Thus, when Special Indian Agent J.K. Graves visited in June 1866, he found that slavery was still widespread, and many of the federal agents had slaves. In his report, he estimated that there were 400 slaves in Santa Fe alone. [4] On March 2, 1867, Congress passed the Peonage Act of 1867, which specifically targeted New Mexican slavery. [111] After this act, the number of slaves taken dropped sharply in the 1870s. [4]


Shortly after the Mormon pioneers settled Salt Lake City on the lands of the Western Shoshone, Weber Ute, [112] and Southern Paiute, [113] conflict with nearby Native American groups began. At the Battle at Fort Utah, Brigham Young led the enslavement of many Timpanogo women and children. [114] [ page needed ] In the winter of 1849-1850, after expanding into Parowan, Mormons attacked a group of Indians, killing around 25 men and taking the women and children as slaves. [115] News of the enslavement reached the US Government, who appointed Edward Cooper as Indian Agent to combat enslavement in September 1850. [116] [117] But at the encouragement of Mormon leaders, the Mormon participation in the Indian slave trade continued to expand. [118] [119] In 1851, Apostle George A. Smith gave Chief Peteetneet and Walkara talking papers that certified "it is my desire that they should be treated as friends, and as they wish to Trade horses, Buckskins and Piede children, we hope them success and prosperity and good bargains." [120] In May 1951 Brigham Young met with settlers in the Parawon region and encouraged them to "buy up the Lamanite children as fast as they could". [121]

However, the Mormons strongly opposed the New Mexican slave trade, which caused sometimes dramatic conflicts with the slave traders. When Don Pedro León Luján was caught violating the Nonintercourse Act in November 1851 by attempting to trade slaves with the Indians without a valid license, he and his party were prosecuted. [122] His property was seized and the child slaves were sold to Mormon families in Manti. In another incident, Ute Chief Arrapine demanded that the Mormons purchase a group of children that they had prevented him from selling to the Mexicans. When they refused, he executed the captives. [123]

In March 1852, the Utah Territory formally legalized Indian slavery with the Act for the relief of Indian Slaves and Prisoners. [124] Mormons continued taking children from their families long after the slave traders left and even began to actively solicit children from parents. They also began selling Indian slaves to each other. [125] By 1853, each of the hundred households in Parowan had one or more Southern Paiute children kept as slaves. [126] Indian slaves were used for both domestic and manual labor. [127] The practice of Indian enslavement concerned the Republican Party, who had made anti-slavery one of the pillars of their platform. While considering appropriations for the Utah Territory, Representative Justin Smith Morrill criticized its laws on Indian slavery. He said that the laws were unconcerned about the way the Indian slaves were captured, noting that the only requirement was that the Indian be possessed by a white person through purchase or otherwise. He said that Utah was the only American government to enslave Indians, and said that state-sanctioned slavery "is a dreg placed at the bottom of the cup by Utah alone". [119] He estimated that in 1857 there were 400 Indian slaves in Utah, but historian Richard Kitchen estimates far more went unrecorded because of their high mortality rate: over half died by their early 20s. [128] Those who survived and were released generally found themselves without a community, full members of neither their original tribes nor the white communities in which they were raised. [4] The Republicans' abhorrence of slavery in Utah delayed Utah's entrance as a state into the Union.


The Spanish missions in Mexican California continued to use forced Indian labor even after Mexican independence, the so-called "Mission Indians" Mission Indians.jpg
The Spanish missions in Mexican California continued to use forced Indian labor even after Mexican independence, the so-called "Mission Indians"

After Mexico gained independence from Spain in 1821, Mexico enacted the Treaty of Córdoba, which decreed that indigenous tribes within its borders were citizens of Mexico. Officially, the newly independent Mexican government proclaimed a policy of social equality for all ethnic groups, and the genízaros were officially considered equals to their vecino (villagers of mainly mixed racial background) and Pueblo neighbors. [129] Vicente Guerrero abolished slavery in 1829. But this never was completely put into practice. The Mexican slave trade continued to flourish, because the Mexican War of Independence had disrupted the defenses at the border. For decades the region was subject to raids by Apaches, Kiowas, and large Comanche war parties who looted, killed and took slaves. The average price for a boy slave was $100, while girls brought $150 to $200. [130] Girls demanded a higher price because they were thought to be excellent house keepers and they were frequently used as sex slaves. Bent's Fort, a trading post on the Santa Fe Trail, was one customer of the enslavers, as were Comancheros, Hispanic traders based in New Mexico. Some border communities in Mexico itself were also in the market for slaves. But in general, Mexican landowners and magnates turned to debt peonage, advancing money to workers on terms that were impossible to meet. Laws were passed requiring servants to complete the terms of any contract for service, essentially reinstating slavery in a new form. [4]

The Mexican secularization act of 1833 "freed" the indigenous people attached to the missions of California, providing for distribution of land to mission indigenous people and sale of remaining grazing land. But through grants and auctions, the bulk of the land was transferred to wealthy Californios and other investors. Any indigenous people who had received land soon fell into debt peonage and became attached to the new Ranchos. The workforce was supplemented with indigenous people who had been captured. [4]

Indigenous involvement in colonial and postcolonial slavery

Indigenous peoples participated in the colonial era slave trade in several ways. During the period of widespread enslavement of indigenous peoples, tribes such as the Westo, [131] Yamasee, [82] Shawnee [131] and others actively enslaved members of other tribes for sale to European settlers. As discussed above, this trade was especially prominent around the Province of Carolina in the 17th and early 18th centuries. In what would become the southwestern United States, the Comanche, Chiricahua, and Ute peoples played a similar role capturing and selling slaves, first to Mexican and then American settlers. [4] In Brazil, many bandeirantes (who captured and enslaved many indigenous peoples) were of indigenous or Mameluco origins themselves.

Some indigenous groups also adopted the European practice of African chattel slavery. [132] All Five Civilized Tribes—the Cherokee, Muscogee, Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw nations—adopted slavery. During the Trail of Tears, they took with them several thousand African slaves. [133] The fact that the Cherokee nation held African slaves played a role in their decision to side with the Confederacy in the American Civil War. [134] In 2017, a dispute erupted over whether the descendants of the Cherokee freedmen should be considered citizens of the Cherokee Nation.

See also


  1. Rushforth estimates "between two and four million Indian slaves", while Reséndez estimates between 2.462 and 4.985 million indigenous people were enslaved.
  2. "The English empire was also able to consume as much of the natives' commodities as the natives could produce, including the trade in enslaved indigenous people. This trade infected the South: it set in motion a gruesome series of wars that engulfed the region. For close to five decades, virtually every group of people in the South lay threatened by destruction in these wars. Huge areas became depopulated, thousands of indigenous people died, and thousands more indigenous people were forcibly relocated to new areas in the South or exported from the region."
  3. In 2007, Castro challenged the position of Bartolomé de las Casas as a central human-rights figure: "rather than viewing him as the ultimate champion of indigenous causes, we must see the Dominican friar as the incarnation of a more benevolent, paternalistic form of ecclesiastical, political, cultural and economic imperialism rather than as a unique paradigmatic figure". See: Castro, The Other Face, Duke, 2007, p 8.
  4. While Philip and the vast majority of hostile Natives were killed outright during the war or sold into slavery in the West Indies, the friendly Wampanoag at Manomet Ponds retained their lands.
  5. But this shows the prudence and fidelity of the Christian Indians; yet notwithstanding all this service they were, with others of our Christian Indians, through the harsh dealings of some English, in a manner constrained, for want of shelter, protection, and encouragement, to fall off to the enemy at Hassanamesit, the story whereof follows in its place; and one of them, viz. Sampson, was slain in fight, by some scouts of our praying Indians, about Watchuset; and the other, Joseph, taken prisoner in Plymouth Colony, and sold for a slave to some merchants at Boston, and sent to Jamaica, but upon the importunity of Mr. Elliot, which the master of the vessel related to him, was brought back again, but not released. His two children taken prisoners with him were redeemed by Mr. Elliot, and afterward his wife, their mother, taken captive, which woman was a sober Christian woman and is employed to teach school among the Indians at Concord, and her children are with her, but her husband held as before, a servant; though several that know the said Joseph and his former carriage, have interceded for his release, but cannot obtain it; some informing authority that he had been active against the English when he was with the enemy.
  6. Sampson was killed by some English scouts near Wachuset, and Joseph was captured and sold into slavery in the West Indies

Related Research Articles

European colonization of the Americas Settlement and conquest of North and South America by Europeans

Although the Norse had explored and colonized northeastern North America c. 1000 CE, a later and more well known wave of European colonization of the Americas took place in the Americas between about 1500 CE and 1800 CE, during the Age of Exploration. During this period of time, several European empires—primarily Spain, Portugal, Britain, and France—began to explore and claim the natural resources and human capital of the Americas, resulting in the displacement and disestablishment of some Indigenous Nations, and the establishment of several settler-colonial states. Some formerly European settler colonies—including New Mexico, Alaska, the Prairies/northern Great Plains, and the "Northwest Territories" in North America; the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, the Yucatán Peninsula, and the Darién Gap in Central America; and the northwest Amazon, the central Andes, and the Guianas in South America—remain relatively rural, sparsely populated and Indigenous into the 21st century, however several settler-colonial states, including Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Argentina, and the United States grew into settler-colonial empires in their own right. Russia began colonizing the Pacific Northwest, starting in the mid-eighteenth century, seeking pelts for the fur trade.. Many of the social structures—including religions, political boundaries, and linguae francae—which predominate the western hemisphere in the 21st century are the descendants of the structures which were established during this period.

Slavery in the colonial history of the United States Slavery in the European colonies that became the United States

Slavery in the colonial history of the United States, from 1526 to 1776, developed from complex factors, and researchers have proposed several theories to explain the development of the institution of slavery and of the slave trade. Slavery strongly correlated with the European colonies' demand for labor, especially for the labor-intensive plantation economies of the sugar colonies in the Caribbean and South America, operated by Great Britain, France, Spain, Portugal and the Dutch Republic.

Slavery in the United States

Slavery in the United States was the legal institution of human chattel slavery, comprising the enslavement primarily of Africans and African Americans, that existed in the United States of America from its founding in 1776 until the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865. Slavery was established throughout European colonization in the Americas. From early colonial days, it was practiced in Britain's colonies, including the Thirteen Colonies which formed the United States. Under the law, an enslaved person was treated as property and could be bought, sold, or given away. Slavery lasted in about half of U.S. states until 1865. As an economic system, slavery was largely replaced by sharecropping and convict leasing.

Colonial Brazil Portuguese 1500-1822/1825 possession in South America

Colonial Brazil comprises the period from 1500, with the arrival of the Portuguese, until 1815, when Brazil was elevated to a kingdom in union with Portugal as the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and the Algarves. During the early 300 years of Brazilian colonial history, the economic exploitation of the territory was based first on brazilwood extraction, which gave the territory its name; sugar production ; and finally on gold and diamond mining. Slaves, especially those brought from Africa, provided most of the work force of the Brazilian export economy after a brief period of Indian slavery to cut brazilwood.

<i>Encomienda</i> Labor system used in various former Spanish colonial territories

The encomienda was a Spanish labor system that rewarded conquerors with the labor of particular groups of conquered non-Christian people. The laborers, in theory, were provided with benefits by the conquerors for whom they labored, the Catholic religion being a principal benefit. The encomienda was first established in Spain following the Christian conquest of Moorish territories, and it was applied on a much larger scale during the Spanish colonization of the Americas and the Spanish Philippines. Conquered peoples were considered vassals of the Spanish monarch. The Crown awarded an encomienda as a grant to a particular individual. In the conquest era of the sixteenth century, the grants were considered to be a monopoly on the labor of particular groups of indigenous peoples, held in perpetuity by the grant holder, called the encomendero, and their descendants.

Population history of Indigenous peoples of the Americas

Population figures for the Indigenous people of the Americas prior to colonization have proven difficult to establish. Scholars rely on archaeological data and written records from European settlers. By the end of the 20th century most scholars gravitated toward an estimate of around 50 million—with some historians arguing for an estimate of 100 million or more.

Slavery in colonial Spanish America Economic and social institution central to the operation of the Spanish Empire

Slavery in the Spanish American colonies was an economic and social institution which existed throughout the Spanish Empire including Spain itself. In its American territories, Spain displayed an early abolitionist stance towards indigenous people although Native American slavery continued to be practiced, particularly until the New Laws of 1543. The Spanish empire, however was involved in the enslavement people of African origin. Although the Spanish themselves played a very minor role in the Atlantic slave trade compared to other European empires, in absolute terms, the Spanish Empire was a major recipient of African slaves, with around 22% of the Africans delivered to American shores ending up in the Spanish Empire.

Black Indians are Native American people — defined as Native American due to being affiliated with Native American communities and being culturally Native American – who also have significant African American heritage. Many Indigenous peoples of the Eastern Woodlands, such as the Narragansett, Pequot, Wampanoag and Shinnecock, as well as people from the nations historically from the Southeast, such as Seminole, Creek and Cherokee, have a significant degree of African and often European ancestry as well.

History of Utah

The History of Utah is an examination of the human history and social activity within the state of Utah located in the western United States.

Slavery in Georgia is known to have been practiced by European colonization. During the colonial era, the practice of slavery in Georgia soon became surpassed by industrial-scale plantation slavery.

Slavery among Native Americans in the United States Native Americans owning, and being, slaves

Slavery among Native Americans in the United States includes slavery by and slavery of Native Americans roughly within what is currently the United States of America.

Afro-Mexicans Mexicans of predominantly African descent

Afro-Mexicans, also known as Black Mexicans, are Mexicans who have visible heritage from Sub-Saharan Africa and identify as such. As a single population, Afro-Mexicans include individuals descended from both free and enslaved black Africans who arrived to Mexico during the colonial era, as well as post-independence migrants. The latter include Afro-descended people from neighboring English, French, and Spanish-speaking countries of the Caribbean and Central America, descendants of enslaved Africans who escaped to Mexico from the Deep South during Slavery in the United States, and to a lesser extent recent migrants directly from Africa. Today, there are localized communities in Mexico with significant although not predominant African ancestry. These are mostly concentrated in specific communities, including the populations of the Costa Chica of Oaxaca, Huetamo, Michoacán, Lázaro Cárdenas, Michoacán, Guerrero, Veracruz and some cities in northern Mexico.

Slavery in Latin America

Slavery in Latin America was an economic and social institution which existed in Latin America from before the colonial era until its legal abolition in the newly independent states during the 19th century, although it continued illegally in some regions into the 20th century. Slavery in Latin America began in the precolonial period, when indigenous civilizations including the Maya and Aztec enslaved captives taken in war. After the conquest of Latin America by the Spanish and Portuguese, over 4 million enslaved Africans were taken to Latin America via the Atlantic slave trade, roughly 3.5 million of those to Brazil.

Indian slave trade in the American Southeast

Native Americans living in the American Southeast were enslaved through warfare and purchased by European colonists throughout the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries, as well as held in captivity through Spanish-organized forced labor systems in Florida. Emerging colonies in Virginia, Carolina, and Georgia imported Native Americans and incorporated them into chattel slavery systems, where they intermixed with slaves of African descent, who would come to outnumber them. Their demand for slaves affected communities as far west as present-day Illinois and the Mississippi River and as far south as the Gulf Coast. The trade in enslaved Native Americans sent tens of thousands of them outside the region to New England and the Caribbean as a profitable export.

History of slavery in Florida

The history of slavery in Florida predates the period of European colonization and was practiced by various indigenous peoples. Enslaved Africans were imported into Florida via the Atlantic slave trade, beginning in the period of Spanish colonial rule, and Black slavery in the region continued after Florida came under British then American control. Slavery in Florida was theoretically abolished the 1863 Emancipation Proclamation issued by President Lincoln, though as the state was part of the Confederacy this had little effect.

Act for the relief of Indian Slaves and Prisoners

The Act for the relief of Indian Slaves and Prisoners, which was passed on March 7, 1852 in the Utah Territory, dealt with Indian slavery. A similar law, the Act in Relation to Service, which had made slavery legal in the territory, had been passed on February 4, 1852.

Slavery in New Mexico had varying legality and levels of enforcement until 1867, when the U.S. Congress banned slavery in the territories. Spain had introduced slavery to the area, Mexico tried to restrict it, as a U.S. territory it was made fully legal again until the Peonage Act of 1867 would officially abolish slavery in the U.S. Territory of New Mexico. During these years, however, black slavery was rare in New Mexico with most slaves being Native Americans. Today, it has been argued that slavery exists in the form of human trafficking.

This article treats the topic of slavery as it occurred in the borders of what is now the state of Utah. Under Spanish and Mexican rule, Utah was a major source of illegal slave raids by Mexican, Ute and Navajo slave traders, particularly on Paiute tribes. When Mormon pioneers entered Utah, they introduced African slavery and provided a local market for Indian slavery. After the Mexican–American War, Utah became part of the United States and slavery was officially legalized in Utah Territory on February 4, 1852 with the passing of the Act in Relation to Service. It was repealed on June 19, 1862 when Congress prohibited slavery in all US territories.

Native American slave ownership

Africans were enslaved by Native Americans from the colonial period until the United States' Civil War. The interactions between Native American and Africans in the antebellum United States is complex. Maintaining institutions of slavery for profit relied largely on Africans enslaved by white American settlers and Native Americans both before and after the United States gained independence via the American Revolutionary War.

Slavery of Mapuches was commonplace in 17th-century Chile and a direct consequence of the Arauco War. When Spanish conquistadors initially subdued indigenous inhabitants of Chile there was no slavery but a form servitude called encomienda. However, this form of forced labour was harsh and many Mapuche would end up dying in the Spanish gold mines in the 16th century.


  1. 1 2 3 Lauber 1913, pp. 25-47.
  2. 1 2 3 Gallay 2009.
  3. Rushforth 2014, pp. 9.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Reséndez 2016.
  5. 1 2 Moses, A. Dirk (April 2010). "Raphael Lemkin, Culture, and the Concept Of Genocide" (PDF). The Oxford Handbook of Genocide Studies. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232116.013.0002 . Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  6. Roberts, Alaina. "How Native Americans adopted slavery from white settlers". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
  7. Foias 2014.
  8. "Maya Social Structure". Tarlton Law Library. University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved 7 August 2021.
  9. Hernández 2012.
  10. "Maya Society". Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  11. "Aztec". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  12. Canseco 1999, p. 63.
  13. Ames, Kenneth M.; Maschner, Herbert D. G. (1999). Peoples of the northwest coast: their archaeology and prehistory. London: Thames & Hudson, p. 196.
  14. Green, Jonathan S. (1915). Journal of a tour on the north west coast of America in the year 1829, containing a description of a part of Oregon, California and the north west coast and the numbers, manners and customs of the native tribes. New York city: Reprinted for C. F. Heartman, p. 45.
  15. Ames, Kenneth M. (2001). "Slaves, Chiefs and Labour on the Northern Northwest Coast". World Archaeology 33 (1): 1–17., p. 3.
  16. "UH - Digital History". Archived from the original on 15 July 2007.
  17. "Warfare". Gatineau: Canadian Museum of History. 30 November 1998. Archived from the original on 23 September 2008. Retrieved 14 October 2015.
  18. Sweeney, James L. (2007). "Caribs, Maroons, Jacobins, Brigands, and Sugar Barons: The Last Stand of the Black Caribs on St. Vincent" Archived 2012-02-27 at the Wayback Machine , African Diaspora Archaeology Network, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, March 2007, retrieved 26 April 2007
  19. Ginzburg 2012.
  20. Helle, Richard. "Slavery". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  21. Robert H. Fuson, ed., The Log of Christopher Columbus, Tab Books, 1992, International Marine Publishing, ISBN   0-87742-316-4.
  22. Columbus (1991, p. 87). Or "these people are very simple as regards the use of arms … for with fifty men they can all be subjugated and made to do what is required of them." (Columbus & Toscanelli, 2010, p. 41)
  23. Reséndez 2016, pp. 553–554.
  24. Gallay 2002, pp. 181-182.
  25. Gallay 2002, pp. 176-179, 204-205.
  26. Perdue 1979.
  27. Floyd 1973, pp. 44.
  28. 1 2 Hartlyn, Jonathan (1998). The Struggle for Democratic Politics in the Dominican Republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. p. 26. ISBN   0-8078-4707-0.
  29. Noble, David Cook. "Nicolás de Ovando" in Encyclopedia of Latin American History and Culture, vol.4, p. 254. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons 1996.
  30. Rodriguez, Junius P. (2007). Encyclopedia of Slave Resistance and Rebellion. 1. p. 184. ISBN   978-0-313-33272-2. Archived from the original on 19 September 2016. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  31. Ida Altman, et al., The Early History of Greater Mexico, Pearson, 2003, p. 47
  32. Anghiera Pietro Martire D' (July 2009). De Orbe Novo, the Eight Decades of Peter Martyr D'Anghera. BiblioBazaar. p. 181. ISBN   978-1-113-14760-8.
  33. Reséndez 2016, pp. 726-787.
  34. Francis, John M. (2005). Iberia and the Americas culture, politics, and history: A Multidisciplinary Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO.
  35. Reséndez 2016, pp. 17.
  36. Tierney, Brian (1997). The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law, and Church Law, 1150-1625. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 270–272. ISBN   0802848540.
  37. Aspinall, Dana E.; Lorenz, Edward C.; Raley, J. Michael (2015). Montesinos' Legacy: Defining and Defending Human Rights for Five Hundred Years. Lexington Books. ISBN   978-1498504140.
  38. Suárez Romero, Miguel Ángel (11 August 2017). "La Situación Jurídica del Indio Durante la Conquista Española en América". Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de México. 54 (242): 229. doi: 10.22201/fder.24488933e.2004.242.61367 .
  39. 1 2 3 Tutino, John (2018). The Mexican Heartland: How Communities Shaped Capitalism, a Nation, and World History, 1500-2000. Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvc774tz.5. ISBN   978-0-691-17436-5.
  40. 1 2 3 Burkholder & Johnson 2019.
  41. Yeager, Timothy J. (December 1995). "Encomienda or Slavery? The Spanish Crown's Choice of Labor Organization in Sixteenth-Century Spanish America". The Journal of Economic History. 55 (4): 842–859. doi:10.1017/S0022050700042182.
  42. Gibson, Charles. "The Colonial Period in Latin American History". Hathi Trust. Service Center for Teachers of History. Retrieved 15 November 2019.
  43. Maybury-Lewis 2002, p. 44.
  44. 1 2 3 Castillo, Ed (2021). "Short Overview of California Indian History". Native American Heritage Commission. State of California. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  45. Beasley, Delilah L. (1918). "Slavery in California," The Journal of Negro History, Vol. 3, No. 1. (Jan.), pp. 33–44.
  46. 1 2 Reséndez 2016, pp. 136.
  47. Reséndez 2016, pp. 137.
  48. Reséndez 2016, pp. 137-138.
  49. Reséndez 2016, pp. 146-147.
  50. Spodek, Howard (February 2005). The World's History, Third Edition: Combined Volume (pages 457-458). Prentice Hall. ISBN   978-0-13-177318-9.
  51. Burkholder & Johnson 2019, pp. 83.
  52. Burkholder & Johnson 2019, pp. 155.
  53. 1 2 Bakewell, 130.
  54. "BBC - A History of the World - About: Transcripts - Episode 80 - Pieces of eight" . Retrieved 7 May 2016.
  55. Burkholder & Johnson 2019, pp. 125-126.
  56. Bakewell, 125.
  57. Reséndez 2016, pp. 127-128.
  58. 1 2 Valenzuela Márquez 2009, pp. 231-233.
  59. Valenzuela Márquez 2009, pp. 234-236.
  60. Barros Arana 2000, pp. 348.
  61. Reséndez 2016, pp. 128.
  62. Molina 1809, pp. 294.
  63. Reséndez 2016, pp. 128-129.
  64. Reséndez 2016, pp. 136-137.
  65. Johnston, Andrew John Bayly (2001). Control and Order in French Colonial Louisbourg, 1713–1758. MSU Press. pp. 8–9. ISBN   978-0-8701-3570-5. JSTOR   10.14321/j.ctt7zt68f.
  66. "History". Fortress of Louisbourg Association. Archived from the original on 23 July 2010. Retrieved 23 April 2015.
  67. Hyde 1988.
  68. Rushforth, Brett (January 2006). "Slavery, the Fox Wars, and the Limits of Alliance". The William and Mary Quarterly. 63 (1): 53–80.
  69. Hyde 1988, pp. 24.
  70. 1 2 3 4 5 Lawrence, Bonita (8 May 2020). "Enslavement of Indigenous People in Canada". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Historica Canada. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  71. 1 2 Cooper, Afua. The Untold Story of Canadian Slavery and the Burning of Old Montreal, (Toronto:HarperPerennial, 2006)
  72. Lauber 1913, pp. 25-48.
  73. Alan Gallay 2009.
  74. Bodge 1906, pp. 479.
  75. Winiarski, Douglas L. (2004). "A Question of Plain Dealing: Josiah Cotton, Native Christians, and the Quest for Security in Eighteenth-Century Plymouth County". New England Quarterly. 77 (3): 368–413.
  76. Gookin 1836, p. 423.
  77. Bodge 1906, pp. 109.
  78. Gallay 2002, pp. 316, 298–301.
  79. Gallay 2002, pp. 972-975.
  80. Gallay 2002, pp. 1028-1030.
  81. Snyder, Christina (2010). Slavery in Indian Country: The Changing Face of Captivity in Early America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN   978-0674048904.
  82. 1 2 Brown, Philip M. 1975. "Early Indian Trade in the Development of South Carolina: Politics, Economics, and Social Mobility during the Proprietary Period, 1670–1719." The South Carolina Historical Magazine 76 (3): 118–28.
  83. 1 2 Lauber 1913, pp. 105-117.
  84. Gallay 2002.
  85. Reséndez 2016, pp. 324.
  86. 1 2 Yarbrough 2008, pp. 112–123.
  87. "Bandeira" . Retrieved 16 February 2017.
  88. "History of Brazil - the Bandeirantes" . Retrieved 16 February 2017.
  89. António Rapôso Tavares Archived 2012-09-01 at the Wayback Machine
  90. Colonial Brazil: Portuguese, Tupi, etc Archived 2009-04-02 at the Wayback Machine
  91. Newell 2009, pp. 33-666.
  92. Beasley, Delilah L. (1918). "Slavery in California". The Journal of Negro History. 3 (1): 33–44.
  93. Johnston-Dodds, Kimberly (2002). "Early California Laws and Policies Related to California Indians" (PDF). California Research Bureau of the California State Library. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 December 2017. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  94. Blakemore, Erin. "California's Little-Known Genocide". HISTORY. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
  95. Madley, Benjamin. "NorCal Native Writes of California Genocide". JPR Jefferson Public Radio.
  96. Dutschke, Dwight (2014). "A History of American Indians in California" (PDF). California Office of Historic Preservation, Five Views: An Ethnic Historic Site Survey for California. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
  97. Johnston-Dodds, Kimberly. "Early California Laws and Policies Related to California Indians" (PDF). 50 California Research Bureau, California State Library. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 October 2014. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
  98. Hunt 2000, pp. 268.
  99. Miller & Smith 1975, pp. 803.
  100. Johnson, Susan Lee. "The Removal of Monuments: What about Kit Carson?". We'reHistory. Retrieved 18 August 2021.
  101. Kaubisch, Barret. "The New Mexico Territory Slave Code (1859-1862)". Black Past. Retrieved 18 August 2021.
  102. "An Act To Provide For The Protection Of Property In Slaves In This Territory". Black Past. Primary Document. Retrieved 18 August 2021.
  103. Roberts 2006, pp. 108–109.
  104. Gonzalez-Berry 2000, pp. 100.
  105. Snodgrass 2011, pp. 556.
  106. Anderson, Gary C. Ethnic Cleansing and the Indian: The Crime that Should Haunt America. University of Oklahoma Press. Oklahoma City, 2014.
  107. Lee, Lloyd ed. Navajo Sovereignty. Understandings and visions of the Diné People. University of Arizona Press: Tucson, 2017.
  108. Forbes 1960.
  109. Dunlay 2000, pp. 202-216.
  110. Brooks 2002, pp. passim.
  111. Wasniewski et al. 2014, p. 52.
  112. Fowler, Don D. (1971). "Anthropology of the Numa: John Wesley Powell's Manuscripts on the Numic Peoples of Western North America, 1868-1880" (PDF). Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press (14): 7. doi:10.5479/SI.00810223.14.1. S2CID   162581418. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 September 2019.
  113. Ellis, Terry (30 December 2013). "History of Salt Lake County". Retrieved 10 May 2020.
  114. Farmer 2008.
  115. Reséndez 2016, pp. 274.
  116. Congressional Series of United States Public Documents, Volume 688. 1853. p. 7.
  117. Blackhawk 2009, pp. 239-240.
  118. Holt 2006, pp. 25.
  119. 1 2 United States. Congress (1857). The Congressional Globe, Part 2. Blair & Rives. p.  287-288.
  120. Richard S. Van Wagoner & Steven C. Walker. A Book of Mormons.
  121. American Historical Company, American Historical Society (1913). Americana, Volume 8. New York: National Americana Society. p. 83.
  122. Melton, Carol Willcox. "United States V. Don Pedro Leon Lujan et al.: 1851-52". JRank Articles. Retrieved 18 August 2021.
  123. Jones, Daniel Webster (1890), "Chapter VIII", Forty Years Among the Indians, Salt Lake City, Utah: Juvenile Instructor Office, p. 53, OCLC   3427232 , retrieved 24 May 2021
  124. Acts, Resolutions, and Memorials Passed at the ... Annual, and Special Sessions, of the Legislative Assembly of the Territory of Utah. Brigham H. Young, Printers. 1866. pp. 87–88.
  125. Knack 2004, pp. 56.
  126. Knack 2004, pp. 57.
  127. Blackhawk 2009, pp. 240.
  128. Kitchen, Richard (2002). "Mormon-Indian Relations in Deseret: Intermarriage and Indenture, 1847 to 1877". Dissertation, Arizona State University.
  129. Rael-Galvéz 2002.
  130. VanLeer, Twila (21 February 1995), "Chief Watched Way of Life Vanish", Deseret News
  131. 1 2 Gallay 2002, pp. 882-883.
  132. McLoughlin, William G. (1 January 1974). "Red Indians, Black Slavery and White Racism: America's Slaveholding Indians". American Quarterly. 26 (4): 367–385. doi:10.2307/2711653. JSTOR   2711653.
  133. Smith, Ryan P. "How Native American Slaveholders Complicate the Trail of Tears Narrative". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
  134. Gibson, Arrell (1981). Oklahoma, a History of Five Centuries. University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN   0-8061-1758-3.


Further reading