Speed of light

Last updated

Speed of light
Earth to Sun - en.png
On average, sunlight takes 8 minutes and 17 seconds to travel from the Sun to Earth.
Exact value
metres per second 299792458
Approximate values (to three significant digits)
kilometres per hour 1080000000
miles per second 186000
miles per hour [1] 671000000
astronomical units per day173 [Note 1]
parsecs per year0.307 [Note 2]
Approximate light signal travel times
one foot 1.0 ns
one metre 3.3 ns
from geostationary orbit to Earth119 ms
the length of Earth's equator 134 ms
from Moon to Earth1.3 s
from Sun to Earth (1 AU)8.3 min
one light-year 1.0 year
one parsec 3.26 years
from the nearest star to Sun (1.3 pc)4.2 years
from the nearest galaxy to Earth70000 years
across the Milky Way 87400 years
from the Andromeda Galaxy to Earth2.5 million years

The speed of light in vacuum, commonly denoted c, is a universal physical constant that is exactly equal to 299,792,458 metres per second (approximately 300,000 kilometres per second; 186,000 miles per second; 671 million miles per hour). [Note 3] According to the special theory of relativity, c is the upper limit for the speed at which conventional matter or energy (and thus any signal carrying information) can travel through space. [4] [5] [6]


All forms of electromagnetic radiation, including visible light, travel at the speed of light. For many practical purposes, light and other electromagnetic waves will appear to propagate instantaneously, but for long distances and very sensitive measurements, their finite speed has noticeable effects. Any starlight viewed on Earth is from the distant past, allowing humans to study the history of the universe by viewing distant objects. When communicating with distant space probes, it can take minutes to hours for signals to travel. In computing, the speed of light fixes the ultimate minimum communication delay. The speed of light can be used in time of flight measurements to measure large distances to extremely high precision.

Ole Rømer first demonstrated in 1676 that light does not travel instantaneously by studying the apparent motion of Jupiter's moon Io. Progressively more accurate measurements of its speed came over the following centuries. In a paper published in 1865, James Clerk Maxwell proposed that light was an electromagnetic wave and, therefore, travelled at speed c. [7] In 1905, Albert Einstein postulated that the speed of light c with respect to any inertial frame of reference is a constant and is independent of the motion of the light source. [8] He explored the consequences of that postulate by deriving the theory of relativity and, in doing so, showed that the parameter c had relevance outside of the context of light and electromagnetism.

Massless particles and field perturbations, such as gravitational waves, also travel at speed c in vacuum. Such particles and waves travel at c regardless of the motion of the source or the inertial reference frame of the observer. Particles with nonzero rest mass can be accelerated to approach c but can never reach it, regardless of the frame of reference in which their speed is measured. In the theory of relativity, c interrelates space and time and appears in the famous mass–energy equivalence, E = mc2. [9]

In some cases, objects or waves may appear to travel faster than light (e.g., phase velocities of waves, the appearance of certain high-speed astronomical objects, and particular quantum effects). The expansion of the universe is understood to exceed the speed of light beyond a certain boundary.

The speed at which light propagates through transparent materials, such as glass or air, is less than c; similarly, the speed of electromagnetic waves in wire cables is slower than c. The ratio between c and the speed v at which light travels in a material is called the refractive index n of the material (n = c/v). For example, for visible light, the refractive index of glass is typically around 1.5, meaning that light in glass travels at c/1.5200000 km/s (124000 mi/s); the refractive index of air for visible light is about 1.0003, so the speed of light in air is about 90 km/s (56 mi/s) slower than c.

Numerical value, notation, and units

The speed of light in vacuum is usually denoted by a lowercase c, for "constant" or the Latin celeritas (meaning 'swiftness, celerity'). In 1856, Wilhelm Eduard Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch had used c for a different constant that was later shown to equal 2 times the speed of light in vacuum. Historically, the symbol V was used as an alternative symbol for the speed of light, introduced by James Clerk Maxwell in 1865. In 1894, Paul Drude redefined c with its modern meaning. Einstein used V in his original German-language papers on special relativity in 1905, but in 1907 he switched to c, which by then had become the standard symbol for the speed of light. [10] [11]

Sometimes c is used for the speed of waves in any material medium, and c0 for the speed of light in vacuum. [12] This subscripted notation, which is endorsed in official SI literature, [13] has the same form as related electromagnetic constants: namely, μ0 for the vacuum permeability or magnetic constant, ε0 for the vacuum permittivity or electric constant, and Z0 for the impedance of free space. This article uses c exclusively for the speed of light in vacuum.

Use in unit systems

Since 1983, the constant c has been defined in the International System of Units (SI) as exactly299792458 m/s; this relationship is used to define the metre as exactly the distance that light travels in vacuum in 1299792458 of a second. By using the value of c, as well as an accurate measurement of the second, one can thus establish a standard for the metre. [14] As a dimensional physical constant, the numerical value of c is different for different unit systems. For example, in imperial units, the speed of light is approximately 186282 miles per second, [Note 4] or roughly 1 foot per nanosecond. [Note 5] [15] [16]

In branches of physics in which c appears often, such as in relativity, it is common to use systems of natural units of measurement or the geometrized unit system where c = 1. [17] [18] Using these units, c does not appear explicitly because multiplication or division by 1 does not affect the result. Its unit of light-second per second is still relevant, even if omitted.

Fundamental role in physics

The speed at which light waves propagate in vacuum is independent both of the motion of the wave source and of the inertial frame of reference of the observer. [Note 6] This invariance of the speed of light was postulated by Einstein in 1905, [8] after being motivated by Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism and the lack of evidence for motion against the luminiferous aether. [19] It has since been consistently confirmed by many experiments. [Note 7] It is only possible to verify experimentally that the two-way speed of light (for example, from a source to a mirror and back again) is frame-independent, because it is impossible to measure the one-way speed of light (for example, from a source to a distant detector) without some convention as to how clocks at the source and at the detector should be synchronized. [20] [21]

By adopting Einstein synchronization for the clocks, the one-way speed of light becomes equal to the two-way speed of light by definition. [20] [21] The special theory of relativity explores the consequences of this invariance of c with the assumption that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference. [22] [23] One consequence is that c is the speed at which all massless particles and waves, including light, must travel in vacuum. [24] [Note 8]

The Lorentz factor g as a function of velocity. It starts at 1 and approaches infinity as v approaches c. Lorentz factor.svg
The Lorentz factor γ as a function of velocity. It starts at 1 and approaches infinity as v approaches c.

Special relativity has many counterintuitive and experimentally verified implications. [26] These include the equivalence of mass and energy (E = mc2), length contraction (moving objects shorten), [Note 9] and time dilation (moving clocks run more slowly). The factor γ by which lengths contract and times dilate is known as the Lorentz factor and is given by γ = (1 − v2/c2)−1/2, where v is the speed of the object. The difference of γ from 1 is negligible for speeds much slower than c, such as most everyday speeds in which case special relativity is closely approximated by Galilean relativity  but it increases at relativistic speeds and diverges to infinity as v approaches c. For example, a time dilation factor of γ = 2 occurs at a relative velocity of 86.6% of the speed of light (v = 0.866 c). Similarly, a time dilation factor of γ = 10 occurs at 99.5% the speed of light (v = 0.995 c).

The results of special relativity can be summarized by treating space and time as a unified structure known as spacetime (with c relating the units of space and time), and requiring that physical theories satisfy a special symmetry called Lorentz invariance, whose mathematical formulation contains the parameter c. [29] Lorentz invariance is an almost universal assumption for modern physical theories, such as quantum electrodynamics, quantum chromodynamics, the Standard Model of particle physics, and general relativity. As such, the parameter c is ubiquitous in modern physics, appearing in many contexts that are unrelated to light. For example, general relativity predicts that c is also the speed of gravity and of gravitational waves, [30] and observations of gravitational waves have been consistent with this prediction. [31] In non-inertial frames of reference (gravitationally curved spacetime or accelerated reference frames), the local speed of light is constant and equal to c, but the speed of light can differ from c when measured from a remote frame of reference, depending on how measurements are extrapolated to the region. [32]

It is generally assumed that fundamental constants such as c have the same value throughout spacetime, meaning that they do not depend on location and do not vary with time. However, it has been suggested in various theories that the speed of light may have changed over time. [33] [34] No conclusive evidence for such changes has been found, but they remain the subject of ongoing research. [35] [36]

It is generally assumed that the speed of light is isotropic, meaning that it has the same value regardless of the direction in which it is measured. Observations of the emissions from nuclear energy levels as a function of the orientation of the emitting nuclei in a magnetic field (see Hughes–Drever experiment), and of rotating optical resonators (see Resonator experiments) have put stringent limits on the possible two-way anisotropy. [37] [38]

Upper limit on speeds

According to special relativity, the energy of an object with rest mass m and speed v is given by γmc2, where γ is the Lorentz factor defined above. When v is zero, γ is equal to one, giving rise to the famous E = mc2 formula for mass–energy equivalence. The γ factor approaches infinity as v approaches c, and it would take an infinite amount of energy to accelerate an object with mass to the speed of light. The speed of light is the upper limit for the speeds of objects with positive rest mass, and individual photons cannot travel faster than the speed of light. [39] This is experimentally established in many tests of relativistic energy and momentum. [40]

Event A precedes B in the red frame, is simultaneous with B in the green frame, and follows B in the blue frame. Relativity of Simultaneity.svg
Event A precedes B in the red frame, is simultaneous with B in the green frame, and follows B in the blue frame.

More generally, it is impossible for signals or energy to travel faster than c. One argument for this follows from the counter-intuitive implication of special relativity known as the relativity of simultaneity. If the spatial distance between two events A and B is greater than the time interval between them multiplied by c then there are frames of reference in which A precedes B, others in which B precedes A, and others in which they are simultaneous. As a result, if something were travelling faster than c relative to an inertial frame of reference, it would be travelling backwards in time relative to another frame, and causality would be violated. [Note 10] [43] In such a frame of reference, an "effect" could be observed before its "cause". Such a violation of causality has never been recorded, [21] and would lead to paradoxes such as the tachyonic antitelephone. [44]

Faster-than-light observations and experiments

There are situations in which it may seem that matter, energy, or information-carrying signal travels at speeds greater than c, but they do not. For example, as is discussed in the propagation of light in a medium section below, many wave velocities can exceed c. The phase velocity of X-rays through most glasses can routinely exceed c, [45] but phase velocity does not determine the velocity at which waves convey information. [46]

If a laser beam is swept quickly across a distant object, the spot of light can move faster than c, although the initial movement of the spot is delayed because of the time it takes light to get to the distant object at the speed c. However, the only physical entities that are moving are the laser and its emitted light, which travels at the speed c from the laser to the various positions of the spot. Similarly, a shadow projected onto a distant object can be made to move faster than c, after a delay in time. [47] In neither case does any matter, energy, or information travel faster than light. [48]

The rate of change in the distance between two objects in a frame of reference with respect to which both are moving (their closing speed) may have a value in excess of c. However, this does not represent the speed of any single object as measured in a single inertial frame. [48]

Certain quantum effects appear to be transmitted instantaneously and therefore faster than c, as in the EPR paradox. An example involves the quantum states of two particles that can be entangled. Until either of the particles is observed, they exist in a superposition of two quantum states. If the particles are separated and one particle's quantum state is observed, the other particle's quantum state is determined instantaneously. However, it is impossible to control which quantum state the first particle will take on when it is observed, so information cannot be transmitted in this manner. [48] [49]

Another quantum effect that predicts the occurrence of faster-than-light speeds is called the Hartman effect: under certain conditions the time needed for a virtual particle to tunnel through a barrier is constant, regardless of the thickness of the barrier. [50] [51] This could result in a virtual particle crossing a large gap faster than light. However, no information can be sent using this effect. [52]

So-called superluminal motion is seen in certain astronomical objects, [53] such as the relativistic jets of radio galaxies and quasars. However, these jets are not moving at speeds in excess of the speed of light: the apparent superluminal motion is a projection effect caused by objects moving near the speed of light and approaching Earth at a small angle to the line of sight: since the light which was emitted when the jet was farther away took longer to reach the Earth, the time between two successive observations corresponds to a longer time between the instants at which the light rays were emitted. [54]

A 2011 experiment where neutrinos were observed to travel faster than light turned out to be due to experimental error. [55] [56]

In models of the expanding universe, the farther galaxies are from each other, the faster they drift apart. For example, galaxies far away from Earth are inferred to be moving away from the Earth with speeds proportional to their distances. Beyond a boundary called the Hubble sphere, the rate at which their distance from Earth increases becomes greater than the speed of light. [57] These recession rates, defined as the increase in proper distance per cosmological time, are not velocities in a relativistic sense. Faster-than-light cosmological recession speeds are only a coordinate artifact.

Propagation of light

In classical physics, light is described as a type of electromagnetic wave. The classical behaviour of the electromagnetic field is described by Maxwell's equations, which predict that the speed c with which electromagnetic waves (such as light) propagate in vacuum is related to the distributed capacitance and inductance of vacuum, otherwise respectively known as the electric constant ε0 and the magnetic constant μ0, by the equation [58]

In modern quantum physics, the electromagnetic field is described by the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED). In this theory, light is described by the fundamental excitations (or quanta) of the electromagnetic field, called photons. In QED, photons are massless particles and thus, according to special relativity, they travel at the speed of light in vacuum. [24]

Extensions of QED in which the photon has a mass have been considered. In such a theory, its speed would depend on its frequency, and the invariant speed c of special relativity would then be the upper limit of the speed of light in vacuum. [32] No variation of the speed of light with frequency has been observed in rigorous testing, putting stringent limits on the mass of the photon. [59] The limit obtained depends on the model used: if the massive photon is described by Proca theory, [60] the experimental upper bound for its mass is about 10−57 grams; [61] if photon mass is generated by a Higgs mechanism, the experimental upper limit is less sharp, m10−14  eV/c2   (roughly 2 × 10−47 g). [60]

Another reason for the speed of light to vary with its frequency would be the failure of special relativity to apply to arbitrarily small scales, as predicted by some proposed theories of quantum gravity. In 2009, the observation of gamma-ray burst GRB 090510 found no evidence for a dependence of photon speed on energy, supporting tight constraints in specific models of spacetime quantization on how this speed is affected by photon energy for energies approaching the Planck scale. [62]

In a medium

In a medium, light usually does not propagate at a speed equal to c; further, different types of light wave will travel at different speeds. The speed at which the individual crests and troughs of a plane wave (a wave filling the whole space, with only one frequency) propagate is called the phase velocity  vp. A physical signal with a finite extent (a pulse of light) travels at a different speed. The overall envelope of the pulse travels at the group velocity  vg, and its earliest part travels at the front velocity  vf. [63]

The blue dot moves at the speed of the ripples, the phase velocity; the green dot moves with the speed of the envelope, the group velocity; and the red dot moves with the speed of the foremost part of the pulse, the front velocity. Frontgroupphase.gif
The blue dot moves at the speed of the ripples, the phase velocity; the green dot moves with the speed of the envelope, the group velocity; and the red dot moves with the speed of the foremost part of the pulse, the front velocity.

The phase velocity is important in determining how a light wave travels through a material or from one material to another. It is often represented in terms of a refractive index. The refractive index of a material is defined as the ratio of c to the phase velocity vp in the material: larger indices of refraction indicate lower speeds. The refractive index of a material may depend on the light's frequency, intensity, polarization, or direction of propagation; in many cases, though, it can be treated as a material-dependent constant. The refractive index of air is approximately 1.0003. [64] Denser media, such as water, [65] glass, [66] and diamond, [67] have refractive indexes of around 1.3, 1.5 and 2.4, respectively, for visible light.

In exotic materials like Bose–Einstein condensates near absolute zero, the effective speed of light may be only a few metres per second. However, this represents absorption and re-radiation delay between atoms, as do all slower-than-c speeds in material substances. As an extreme example of light "slowing" in matter, two independent teams of physicists claimed to bring light to a "complete standstill" by passing it through a Bose–Einstein condensate of the element rubidium. The popular description of light being "stopped" in these experiments refers only to light being stored in the excited states of atoms, then re-emitted at an arbitrarily later time, as stimulated by a second laser pulse. During the time it had "stopped", it had ceased to be light. This type of behaviour is generally microscopically true of all transparent media which "slow" the speed of light. [68]

In transparent materials, the refractive index generally is greater than 1, meaning that the phase velocity is less than c. In other materials, it is possible for the refractive index to become smaller than 1 for some frequencies; in some exotic materials it is even possible for the index of refraction to become negative. [69] The requirement that causality is not violated implies that the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric constant of any material, corresponding respectively to the index of refraction and to the attenuation coefficient, are linked by the Kramers–Kronig relations. [70] [71] In practical terms, this means that in a material with refractive index less than 1, the wave will be absorbed quickly. [72]

A pulse with different group and phase velocities (which occurs if the phase velocity is not the same for all the frequencies of the pulse) smears out over time, a process known as dispersion. Certain materials have an exceptionally low (or even zero) group velocity for light waves, a phenomenon called slow light. [73] The opposite, group velocities exceeding c, was proposed theoretically in 1993 and achieved experimentally in 2000. [74] It should even be possible for the group velocity to become infinite or negative, with pulses travelling instantaneously or backwards in time. [63]

None of these options allow information to be transmitted faster than c. It is impossible to transmit information with a light pulse any faster than the speed of the earliest part of the pulse (the front velocity). It can be shown that this is (under certain assumptions) always equal to c. [63]

It is possible for a particle to travel through a medium faster than the phase velocity of light in that medium (but still slower than c). When a charged particle does that in a dielectric material, the electromagnetic equivalent of a shock wave, known as Cherenkov radiation, is emitted. [75]

Practical effects of finiteness

The speed of light is of relevance to communications: the one-way and round-trip delay time are greater than zero. This applies from small to astronomical scales. On the other hand, some techniques depend on the finite speed of light, for example in distance measurements.

Small scales

In computers, the speed of light imposes a limit on how quickly data can be sent between processors. If a processor operates at 1  gigahertz, a signal can travel only a maximum of about 30 centimetres (1 ft) in a single clock cycle — in practice, this distance is even shorter since the printed circuit board refracts and slows down signals. Processors must therefore be placed close to each other, as well as memory chips, to minimize communication latencies, and care must be exercised when routing wires between them to ensure signal integrity. If clock frequencies continue to increase, the speed of light may eventually become a limiting factor for the internal design of single chips. [76] [77]

Large distances on Earth

Acoustic representation of the speed of light, at every beep the light makes a full circle around the equator

Given that the equatorial circumference of the Earth is about 40075 km and that c is about 300000 km/s, the theoretical shortest time for a piece of information to travel half the globe along the surface is about 67 milliseconds. When light is traveling in optical fibre (a transparent material) the actual transit time is longer, in part because the speed of light is slower by about 35% in optical fibre, depending on its refractive index n. [Note 11] Straight lines are rare in global communications and the travel time increases when signals pass through electronic switches or signal regenerators. [79]

Although this distance is largely irrelevant for most applications, latency becomes important in fields such as high-frequency trading, where traders seek to gain minute advantages by delivering their trades to exchanges fractions of a second ahead of other traders. For example, traders have been switching to microwave communications between trading hubs, because of the advantage which radio waves travelling at near to the speed of light through air have over comparatively slower fibre optic signals. [80] [81]

Spaceflight and astronomy

A beam of light is depicted travelling between the Earth and the Moon in the time it takes a light pulse to move between them: 1.255 seconds at their mean orbital (surface-to-surface) distance. The relative sizes and separation of the Earth-Moon system are shown to scale. Earth and Moon speed of light by James O'Donoghue.gif
A beam of light is depicted travelling between the Earth and the Moon in the time it takes a light pulse to move between them: 1.255 seconds at their mean orbital (surface-to-surface) distance. The relative sizes and separation of the Earth–Moon system are shown to scale.

Similarly, communications between the Earth and spacecraft are not instantaneous. There is a brief delay from the source to the receiver, which becomes more noticeable as distances increase. This delay was significant for communications between ground control and Apollo 8 when it became the first crewed spacecraft to orbit the Moon: for every question, the ground control station had to wait at least three seconds for the answer to arrive. [82]

The communications delay between Earth and Mars can vary between five and twenty minutes depending upon the relative positions of the two planets. As a consequence of this, if a robot on the surface of Mars were to encounter a problem, its human controllers would not be aware of it until 5–20 minutes later. It would then take a further 5–20 minutes for commands to travel from Earth to Mars. [83]

Receiving light and other signals from distant astronomical sources takes much longer. For example, it takes 13 billion (13×109) years for light to travel to Earth from the faraway galaxies viewed in the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field images. [84] [85] Those photographs, taken today, capture images of the galaxies as they appeared 13 billion years ago, when the universe was less than a billion years old. [84] The fact that more distant objects appear to be younger, due to the finite speed of light, allows astronomers to infer the evolution of stars, of galaxies, and of the universe itself. [86]

Astronomical distances are sometimes expressed in light-years, especially in popular science publications and media. [87] A light-year is the distance light travels in one Julian year, around 9461 billion kilometres, 5879 billion miles, or 0.3066 parsecs. In round figures, a light year is nearly 10 trillion kilometres or nearly 6 trillion miles. Proxima Centauri, the closest star to Earth after the Sun, is around 4.2 light-years away. [88]

Distance measurement

Radar systems measure the distance to a target by the time it takes a radio-wave pulse to return to the radar antenna after being reflected by the target: the distance to the target is half the round-trip transit time multiplied by the speed of light. A Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver measures its distance to GPS satellites based on how long it takes for a radio signal to arrive from each satellite, and from these distances calculates the receiver's position. Because light travels about 300000 kilometres (186000 mi) in one second, these measurements of small fractions of a second must be very precise. The Lunar Laser Ranging experiment, radar astronomy and the Deep Space Network determine distances to the Moon, [89] planets [90] and spacecraft, [91] respectively, by measuring round-trip transit times.


There are different ways to determine the value of c. One way is to measure the actual speed at which light waves propagate, which can be done in various astronomical and Earth-based setups. It is also possible to determine c from other physical laws where it appears, for example, by determining the values of the electromagnetic constants ε0 and μ0 and using their relation to c. Historically, the most accurate results have been obtained by separately determining the frequency and wavelength of a light beam, with their product equalling c. This is described in more detail in the "Interferometry" section below.

In 1983 the metre was defined as "the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1299792458 of a second", [92] fixing the value of the speed of light at 299792458 m/s by definition, as described below. Consequently, accurate measurements of the speed of light yield an accurate realization of the metre rather than an accurate value of c.

Astronomical measurements

Measurement of the speed of light from the time it takes Io to orbit Jupiter, using eclipses of Io by Jupiter's shadow to precisely measure its orbit. Io eclipse speed of light measurement.svg
Measurement of the speed of light from the time it takes Io to orbit Jupiter, using eclipses of Io by Jupiter's shadow to precisely measure its orbit.

Outer space is a convenient setting for measuring the speed of light because of its large scale and nearly perfect vacuum. Typically, one measures the time needed for light to traverse some reference distance in the Solar System, such as the radius of the Earth's orbit. Historically, such measurements could be made fairly accurately, compared to how accurately the length of the reference distance is known in Earth-based units.

Ole Christensen Rømer used an astronomical measurement to make the first quantitative estimate of the speed of light in the year 1676. [93] [94] When measured from Earth, the periods of moons orbiting a distant planet are shorter when the Earth is approaching the planet than when the Earth is receding from it. The difference is small, but the cumulative time becomes significant when measured over months. The distance travelled by light from the planet (or its moon) to Earth is shorter when the Earth is at the point in its orbit that is closest to its planet than when the Earth is at the farthest point in its orbit, the difference in distance being the diameter of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. The observed change in the moon's orbital period is caused by the difference in the time it takes light to traverse the shorter or longer distance. Rømer observed this effect for Jupiter's innermost major moon Io and deduced that light takes 22 minutes to cross the diameter of the Earth's orbit. [93]

Aberration of light: light from a distant source appears to be from a different location for a moving telescope due to the finite speed of light. SoL Aberration.svg
Aberration of light: light from a distant source appears to be from a different location for a moving telescope due to the finite speed of light.

Another method is to use the aberration of light, discovered and explained by James Bradley in the 18th century. [95] This effect results from the vector addition of the velocity of light arriving from a distant source (such as a star) and the velocity of its observer (see diagram on the right). A moving observer thus sees the light coming from a slightly different direction and consequently sees the source at a position shifted from its original position. Since the direction of the Earth's velocity changes continuously as the Earth orbits the Sun, this effect causes the apparent position of stars to move around. From the angular difference in the position of stars (maximally 20.5 arcseconds) [96] it is possible to express the speed of light in terms of the Earth's velocity around the Sun, which with the known length of a year can be converted to the time needed to travel from the Sun to the Earth. In 1729, Bradley used this method to derive that light travelled 10210 times faster than the Earth in its orbit (the modern figure is 10066 times faster) or, equivalently, that it would take light 8 minutes 12 seconds to travel from the Sun to the Earth. [95]

Astronomical unit

An astronomical unit (AU) is approximately the average distance between the Earth and Sun. It was redefined in 2012 as exactly 149597870700 m. [97] [98] Previously the AU was not based on the International System of Units but in terms of the gravitational force exerted by the Sun in the framework of classical mechanics. [Note 12] The current definition uses the recommended value in metres for the previous definition of the astronomical unit, which was determined by measurement. [97] This redefinition is analogous to that of the metre and likewise has the effect of fixing the speed of light to an exact value in astronomical units per second (via the exact speed of light in metres per second). [100]

Previously, the inverse of c expressed in seconds per astronomical unit was measured by comparing the time for radio signals to reach different spacecraft in the Solar System, with their position calculated from the gravitational effects of the Sun and various planets. By combining many such measurements, a best fit value for the light time per unit distance could be obtained. For example, in 2009, the best estimate, as approved by the International Astronomical Union (IAU), was: [101] [102]

light time for unit distance: tau = 499.004783836(10) s,
c = 0.00200398880410(4) AU/s = 173.144632674(3) AU/d.

The relative uncertainty in these measurements is 0.02 parts per billion (2×10−11), equivalent to the uncertainty in Earth-based measurements of length by interferometry. [103] Since the metre is defined to be the length travelled by light in a certain time interval, the measurement of the light time in terms of the previous definition of the astronomical unit can also be interpreted as measuring the length of an AU (old definition) in metres. [Note 13]

Time of flight techniques

One of the last and most accurate time of flight measurements, Michelson, Pease and Pearson's 1930-1935 experiment used a rotating mirror and a one-mile (1.6 km) long vacuum chamber which the light beam traversed 10 times. It achieved accuracy of +-11 km/s. Michelson speed of light measurement 1930.jpg
One of the last and most accurate time of flight measurements, Michelson, Pease and Pearson's 1930–1935 experiment used a rotating mirror and a one-mile (1.6 km) long vacuum chamber which the light beam traversed 10 times. It achieved accuracy of ±11 km/s.
Diagram of the Fizeau apparatus:
.mw-parser-output figure[typeof="mw:File/Thumb"] .image-key>ol{margin-left:1.3em;margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output figure[typeof="mw:File/Thumb"] .image-key>ul{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output figure[typeof="mw:File/Thumb"] .image-key li{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}@media(min-width:300px){.mw-parser-output figure[typeof="mw:File/Thumb"] .image-key,.mw-parser-output figure[typeof="mw:File/Thumb"] .image-key-wide{column-count:2}.mw-parser-output figure[typeof="mw:File/Thumb"] .image-key-narrow{column-count:1}}@media(min-width:450px){.mw-parser-output figure[typeof="mw:File/Thumb"] .image-key-wide{column-count:3}}
Light source
Beam-splitting semi-transparent mirror
Toothed wheel-breaker of the light beam
Remote mirror
Telescopic tube Fizeau-int.svg
Diagram of the Fizeau apparatus:
  1. Light source
  2. Beam-splitting semi-transparent mirror
  3. Toothed wheel-breaker of the light beam
  4. Remote mirror
  5. Telescopic tube

A method of measuring the speed of light is to measure the time needed for light to travel to a mirror at a known distance and back. This is the working principle behind experiments by Hippolyte Fizeau and Léon Foucault.

The setup as used by Fizeau consists of a beam of light directed at a mirror 8 kilometres (5 mi) away. On the way from the source to the mirror, the beam passes through a rotating cogwheel. At a certain rate of rotation, the beam passes through one gap on the way out and another on the way back, but at slightly higher or lower rates, the beam strikes a tooth and does not pass through the wheel. Knowing the distance between the wheel and the mirror, the number of teeth on the wheel, and the rate of rotation, the speed of light can be calculated. [104]

The method of Foucault replaces the cogwheel with a rotating mirror. Because the mirror keeps rotating while the light travels to the distant mirror and back, the light is reflected from the rotating mirror at a different angle on its way out than it is on its way back. From this difference in angle, the known speed of rotation and the distance to the distant mirror the speed of light may be calculated. [105] Foucault used this apparatus to measure the speed of light in air versus water, based on a suggestion by François Arago. [106]

Today, using oscilloscopes with time resolutions of less than one nanosecond, the speed of light can be directly measured by timing the delay of a light pulse from a laser or an LED reflected from a mirror. This method is less precise (with errors of the order of 1%) than other modern techniques, but it is sometimes used as a laboratory experiment in college physics classes. [107]

Electromagnetic constants

An option for deriving c that does not directly depend on a measurement of the propagation of electromagnetic waves is to use the relation between c and the vacuum permittivity ε0 and vacuum permeability μ0 established by Maxwell's theory: c2 = 1/(ε0μ0). The vacuum permittivity may be determined by measuring the capacitance and dimensions of a capacitor, whereas the value of the vacuum permeability was historically fixed at exactly ×10−7 Hm−1 through the definition of the ampere. Rosa and Dorsey used this method in 1907 to find a value of 299710±22 km/s. Their method depended upon having a standard unit of electrical resistance, the "international ohm", and so its accuracy was limited by how this standard was defined. [108] [109]

Cavity resonance

Electromagnetic standing waves in a cavity Waves in Box.svg
Electromagnetic standing waves in a cavity

Another way to measure the speed of light is to independently measure the frequency f and wavelength λ of an electromagnetic wave in vacuum. The value of c can then be found by using the relation c = . One option is to measure the resonance frequency of a cavity resonator. If the dimensions of the resonance cavity are also known, these can be used to determine the wavelength of the wave. In 1946, Louis Essen and A.C. Gordon-Smith established the frequency for a variety of normal modes of microwaves of a microwave cavity of precisely known dimensions. The dimensions were established to an accuracy of about ±0.8 μm using gauges calibrated by interferometry. [108] As the wavelength of the modes was known from the geometry of the cavity and from electromagnetic theory, knowledge of the associated frequencies enabled a calculation of the speed of light. [108] [110]

The Essen–Gordon-Smith result, 299792±9 km/s, was substantially more precise than those found by optical techniques. [108] By 1950, repeated measurements by Essen established a result of 299792.5±3.0 km/s. [111]

A household demonstration of this technique is possible, using a microwave oven and food such as marshmallows or margarine: if the turntable is removed so that the food does not move, it will cook the fastest at the antinodes (the points at which the wave amplitude is the greatest), where it will begin to melt. The distance between two such spots is half the wavelength of the microwaves; by measuring this distance and multiplying the wavelength by the microwave frequency (usually displayed on the back of the oven, typically 2450 MHz), the value of c can be calculated, "often with less than 5% error". [112] [113]


An interferometric determination of length. Left: constructive interference; Right: destructive interference. Interferometer sol.svg
An interferometric determination of length. Left: constructive interference; Right: destructive interference.

Interferometry is another method to find the wavelength of electromagnetic radiation for determining the speed of light. [Note 14] A coherent beam of light (e.g. from a laser), with a known frequency (f), is split to follow two paths and then recombined. By adjusting the path length while observing the interference pattern and carefully measuring the change in path length, the wavelength of the light (λ) can be determined. The speed of light is then calculated using the equation c = λf.

Before the advent of laser technology, coherent radio sources were used for interferometry measurements of the speed of light. [115] Interferometric determination of wavelength becomes less precise with wavelength and the experiments were thus limited in precision by the long wavelength (~4 mm (0.16 in)) of the radiowaves. The precision can be improved by using light with a shorter wavelength, but then it becomes difficult to directly measure the frequency of the light. [116]

One way around this problem is to start with a low frequency signal of which the frequency can be precisely measured, and from this signal progressively synthesize higher frequency signals whose frequency can then be linked to the original signal. A laser can then be locked to the frequency, and its wavelength can be determined using interferometry. [116] This technique was due to a group at the National Bureau of Standards (which later became the National Institute of Standards and Technology). They used it in 1972 to measure the speed of light in vacuum with a fractional uncertainty of 3.5×10−9. [116] [117]


Until the early modern period, it was not known whether light travelled instantaneously or at a very fast finite speed. The first extant recorded examination of this subject was in ancient Greece. The ancient Greeks, Arabic scholars, and classical European scientists long debated this until Rømer provided the first calculation of the speed of light. Einstein's theory of special relativity postulates that the speed of light is constant regardless of one's frame of reference. Since then, scientists have provided increasingly accurate measurements.

History of measurements of c (in m/s)
<1638 Galileo, covered lanternsinconclusive [118] [119] [120] :1252 [Note 15]
<1667 Accademia del Cimento, covered lanternsinconclusive [120] :1253 [121]
1675 Rømer and Huygens, moons of Jupiter220000000 [94] [122] −27%
1729 James Bradley, aberration of light301000000 [104] +0.40%
1849 Hippolyte Fizeau, toothed wheel315000000 [104] +5.1%
1862 Léon Foucault, rotating mirror298000000±500000 [104] −0.60%
1875Werner Siemens260 000 000 [123]
1893 Heinrich Hertz 200 000 000 [124]
1907Rosa and Dorsey, EM constants299710000±30000 [108] [109] −280 ppm
1926 Albert A. Michelson, rotating mirror299796000±4000 [125] +12 ppm
1950Essen and Gordon-Smith, cavity resonator299792500±3000 [111] +0.14 ppm
1958K. D. Froome, radio interferometry299792500±100 [115] +0.14 ppm
1972Evenson et al., laser interferometry299792456.2±1.1 [117] −0.006 ppm
198317th CGPM, definition of the metre299792458 (exact) [92]

Early history

Empedocles (c. 490–430 BCE) was the first to propose a theory of light [126] and claimed that light has a finite speed. [127] He maintained that light was something in motion, and therefore must take some time to travel. Aristotle argued, to the contrary, that "light is due to the presence of something, but it is not a movement". [128] Euclid and Ptolemy advanced Empedocles' emission theory of vision, where light is emitted from the eye, thus enabling sight. Based on that theory, Heron of Alexandria argued that the speed of light must be infinite because distant objects such as stars appear immediately upon opening the eyes. [129]

Early Islamic philosophers initially agreed with the Aristotelian view that light had no speed of travel. In 1021, Alhazen (Ibn al-Haytham) published the Book of Optics , in which he presented a series of arguments dismissing the emission theory of vision in favour of the now accepted intromission theory, in which light moves from an object into the eye. [130] This led Alhazen to propose that light must have a finite speed, [128] [131] [132] and that the speed of light is variable, decreasing in denser bodies. [132] [133] He argued that light is substantial matter, the propagation of which requires time, even if this is hidden from the senses. [134] Also in the 11th century, Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī agreed that light has a finite speed, and observed that the speed of light is much faster than the speed of sound. [135]

In the 13th century, Roger Bacon argued that the speed of light in air was not infinite, using philosophical arguments backed by the writing of Alhazen and Aristotle. [136] [137] In the 1270s, Witelo considered the possibility of light travelling at infinite speed in vacuum, but slowing down in denser bodies. [138]

In the early 17th century, Johannes Kepler believed that the speed of light was infinite since empty space presents no obstacle to it. René Descartes argued that if the speed of light were to be finite, the Sun, Earth, and Moon would be noticeably out of alignment during a lunar eclipse. Although this argument fails when aberration of light is taken into account, the latter was not recognized until the following century. [139] Since such misalignment had not been observed, Descartes concluded the speed of light was infinite. Descartes speculated that if the speed of light were found to be finite, his whole system of philosophy might be demolished. [128] Despite this, in his derivation of Snell's law, Descartes assumed that some kind of motion associated with light was faster in denser media. [140] [141] Pierre de Fermat derived Snell's law using the opposing assumption, the denser the medium the slower light travelled. Fermat also argued in support of a finite speed of light. [142]

First measurement attempts

In 1629, Isaac Beeckman proposed an experiment in which a person observes the flash of a cannon reflecting off a mirror about one mile (1.6 km) away. In 1638, Galileo Galilei proposed an experiment, with an apparent claim to having performed it some years earlier, to measure the speed of light by observing the delay between uncovering a lantern and its perception some distance away. He was unable to distinguish whether light travel was instantaneous or not, but concluded that if it were not, it must nevertheless be extraordinarily rapid. [118] [119] In 1667, the Accademia del Cimento of Florence reported that it had performed Galileo's experiment, with the lanterns separated by about one mile, but no delay was observed. [143] The actual delay in this experiment would have been about 11 microseconds.

Romer's observations of the occultations of Io from Earth Illustration from 1676 article on Ole Romer's measurement of the speed of light.png
Rømer's observations of the occultations of Io from Earth

The first quantitative estimate of the speed of light was made in 1676 by Ole Rømer. [93] [94] From the observation that the periods of Jupiter's innermost moon Io appeared to be shorter when the Earth was approaching Jupiter than when receding from it, he concluded that light travels at a finite speed, and estimated that it takes light 22 minutes to cross the diameter of Earth's orbit. Christiaan Huygens combined this estimate with an estimate for the diameter of the Earth's orbit to obtain an estimate of speed of light of 220000 km/s, which is 27% lower than the actual value. [122]

In his 1704 book Opticks , Isaac Newton reported Rømer's calculations of the finite speed of light and gave a value of "seven or eight minutes" for the time taken for light to travel from the Sun to the Earth (the modern value is 8 minutes 19 seconds). [144] Newton queried whether Rømer's eclipse shadows were coloured. Hearing that they were not, he concluded the different colours travelled at the same speed. In 1729, James Bradley discovered stellar aberration. [95] From this effect he determined that light must travel 10,210 times faster than the Earth in its orbit (the modern figure is 10,066 times faster) or, equivalently, that it would take light 8 minutes 12 seconds to travel from the Sun to the Earth. [95]

Connections with electromagnetism

In the 19th century Hippolyte Fizeau developed a method to determine the speed of light based on time-of-flight measurements on Earth and reported a value of 315000 km/s. [145] His method was improved upon by Léon Foucault who obtained a value of 298000 km/s in 1862. [104] In the year 1856, Wilhelm Eduard Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch measured the ratio of the electromagnetic and electrostatic units of charge, 1/ε0μ0, by discharging a Leyden jar, and found that its numerical value was very close to the speed of light as measured directly by Fizeau. The following year Gustav Kirchhoff calculated that an electric signal in a resistanceless wire travels along the wire at this speed. [146]

In the early 1860s, Maxwell showed that, according to the theory of electromagnetism he was working on, electromagnetic waves propagate in empty space [147] at a speed equal to the above Weber/Kohlrausch ratio, and drawing attention to the numerical proximity of this value to the speed of light as measured by Fizeau, he proposed that light is in fact an electromagnetic wave. [148] Maxwell backed up his claim with his own experiment published in the 1868 Philosophical Transactions which determined the ratio of the electrostatic and electromagnetic units of electricity. [149]

"Luminiferous aether"

The wave properties of light were well known since Thomas Young. In the 19th century, physicists believed light was propagating in a medium called aether (or ether). But for electric force, it looks more like the gravitational force in Newton's law. A transmitting medium was not required. After Maxwell theory unified light and electric and magnetic waves, it was favored that both light and electric magnetic waves propagate in the same aether medium (or called the luminiferous aether). [150]

Hendrik Lorentz (right) with Albert Einstein (1921) Einstein en Lorentz.jpg
Hendrik Lorentz (right) with Albert Einstein (1921)

It was thought at the time that empty space was filled with a background medium called the luminiferous aether in which the electromagnetic field existed. Some physicists thought that this aether acted as a preferred frame of reference for the propagation of light and therefore it should be possible to measure the motion of the Earth with respect to this medium, by measuring the isotropy of the speed of light. Beginning in the 1880s several experiments were performed to try to detect this motion, the most famous of which is the experiment performed by Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley in 1887. [151] [152] The detected motion was found to always be nil (within observational error). Modern experiments indicate that the two-way speed of light is isotropic (the same in every direction) to within 6 nanometres per second. [153]

Because of this experiment Hendrik Lorentz proposed that the motion of the apparatus through the aether may cause the apparatus to contract along its length in the direction of motion, and he further assumed that the time variable for moving systems must also be changed accordingly ("local time"), which led to the formulation of the Lorentz transformation. Based on Lorentz's aether theory, Henri Poincaré (1900) showed that this local time (to first order in v/c) is indicated by clocks moving in the aether, which are synchronized under the assumption of constant light speed. In 1904, he speculated that the speed of light could be a limiting velocity in dynamics, provided that the assumptions of Lorentz's theory are all confirmed. In 1905, Poincaré brought Lorentz's aether theory into full observational agreement with the principle of relativity. [154] [155]

Special relativity

In 1905 Einstein postulated from the outset that the speed of light in vacuum, measured by a non-accelerating observer, is independent of the motion of the source or observer. Using this and the principle of relativity as a basis he derived the special theory of relativity, in which the speed of light in vacuum c featured as a fundamental constant, also appearing in contexts unrelated to light. This made the concept of the stationary aether (to which Lorentz and Poincaré still adhered) useless and revolutionized the concepts of space and time. [156] [157]

Increased accuracy of c and redefinition of the metre and second

In the second half of the 20th century, much progress was made in increasing the accuracy of measurements of the speed of light, first by cavity resonance techniques and later by laser interferometer techniques. These were aided by new, more precise, definitions of the metre and second. In 1950, Louis Essen determined the speed as 299792.5±3.0 km/s, using cavity resonance. [111] This value was adopted by the 12th General Assembly of the Radio-Scientific Union in 1957. In 1960, the metre was redefined in terms of the wavelength of a particular spectral line of krypton-86, and, in 1967, the second was redefined in terms of the hyperfine transition frequency of the ground state of caesium-133. [158]

In 1972, using the laser interferometer method and the new definitions, a group at the US National Bureau of Standards in Boulder, Colorado determined the speed of light in vacuum to be c = 299792456.2±1.1 m/s. This was 100 times less uncertain than the previously accepted value. The remaining uncertainty was mainly related to the definition of the metre. [Note 16] [117] As similar experiments found comparable results for c, the 15th General Conference on Weights and Measures in 1975 recommended using the value 299792458 m/s for the speed of light. [161]

Defined as an explicit constant

In 1983 the 17th meeting of the General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) found that wavelengths from frequency measurements and a given value for the speed of light are more reproducible than the previous standard. They kept the 1967 definition of second, so the caesium hyperfine frequency would now determine both the second and the metre. To do this, they redefined the metre as "the length of the path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299792458 of a second". [92]

As a result of this definition, the value of the speed of light in vacuum is exactly 299792458 m/s [162] [163] and has become a defined constant in the SI system of units. [14] Improved experimental techniques that, prior to 1983, would have measured the speed of light no longer affect the known value of the speed of light in SI units, but instead allow a more precise realization of the metre by more accurately measuring the wavelength of krypton-86 and other light sources. [164] [165]

In 2011, the CGPM stated its intention to redefine all seven SI base units using what it calls "the explicit-constant formulation", where each "unit is defined indirectly by specifying explicitly an exact value for a well-recognized fundamental constant", as was done for the speed of light. It proposed a new, but completely equivalent, wording of the metre's definition: "The metre, symbol m, is the unit of length; its magnitude is set by fixing the numerical value of the speed of light in vacuum to be equal to exactly 299792458 when it is expressed in the SI unit m s−1." [166] This was one of the changes that was incorporated in the 2019 redefinition of the SI base units, also termed the New SI. [167]

See also


  1. Exact value: (299792458 × 60 × 60 × 24 / 149597870700) AU/day.
  2. Exact value: (999992651 π / 10246429500) pc/y.
  3. It is exact because, by a 1983 international agreement, a metre is defined as the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1299792458 second. This particular value was chosen to provide a more accurate definition of the metre that still agreed as much as possible with the definition used before. See, for example, the NIST website [2] or the explanation by Penrose. [3] The second is, in turn, defined to be the length of time occupied by 9192631770 cycles of the radiation emitted by a caesium-133 atom in a transition between two specified energy states. [2]
  4. The speed of light in imperial and United States customary units is based on an inch of exactly 2.54 cm and is exactly
    299792458 m/s × 100 cm/m × 1/2.54 in/cm,
    which is exactly 186282 miles, 698 yards, 2 feet, and 5 21/127 inches per second.
  5. The exact value is 149896229/152400000ft/ns ≈ 0.98ft/ns.
  6. However, the frequency of light can depend on the motion of the source relative to the observer, due to the Doppler effect.
  7. See Michelson–Morley experiment and Kennedy–Thorndike experiment, for example.
  8. Because neutrinos have a small but non-zero mass, they travel through empty space very slightly more slowly than light. However, because they pass through matter much more easily than light does, there are in theory occasions when the neutrino signal from an astronomical event might reach Earth before an optical signal can, like supernovae. [25]
  9. Whereas moving objects are measured to be shorter along the line of relative motion, they are also seen as being rotated. This effect, known as Terrell rotation, is due to the different times that light from different parts of the object takes to reach the observer. [27] [28]
  10. It has been speculated that the Scharnhorst effect does allow signals to travel slightly faster than c, but the validity of those calculations has been questioned, [41] and it appears the special conditions in which this effect might occur would prevent one from using it to violate causality. [42]
  11. A typical value for the refractive index of optical fibre is between 1.518 and 1.538. [78]
  12. The astronomical unit was defined as the radius of an unperturbed circular Newtonian orbit about the Sun of a particle having infinitesimal mass, moving with an angular frequency of 0.01720209895 radians (approximately 1365.256898 of a revolution) per day. [99]
  13. Nevertheless, at this degree of precision, the effects of general relativity must be taken into consideration when interpreting the length. The metre is considered to be a unit of proper length, whereas the AU is usually used as a unit of observed length in a given frame of reference. The values cited here follow the latter convention, and are TDB-compatible. [102]
  14. A detailed discussion of the interferometer and its use for determining the speed of light can be found in Vaughan (1989). [114]
  15. According to Galileo, the lanterns he used were "at a short distance, less than a mile". Assuming the distance was not too much shorter than a mile, and that "about a thirtieth of a second is the minimum time interval distinguishable by the unaided eye", Boyer notes that Galileo's experiment could at best be said to have established a lower limit of about 60 miles per second for the velocity of light. [119]
  16. Between 1960 and 1983 the metre was defined as "the length equal to 1650763.73 wavelengths in vacuum of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the levels 2p10 and 5d5 of the krypton-86 atom". [159] It was discovered in the 1970s that this spectral line was not symmetric, which put a limit on the precision with which the definition could be realized in interferometry experiments. [160]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gravitational redshift</span> Shift of wavelength of a photon to longer wavelength

In physics and general relativity, gravitational redshift is the phenomenon that electromagnetic waves or photons travelling out of a gravitational well lose energy. This loss of energy corresponds to a decrease in the wave frequency and increase in the wavelength, known more generally as a redshift. The opposite effect, in which photons gain energy when travelling into a gravitational well, is known as a gravitational blueshift. The effect was first described by Einstein in 1907, eight years before his publication of the full theory of relativity.

Faster-than-light travel and communication are the conjectural propagation of matter or information faster than the speed of light. The special theory of relativity implies that only particles with zero rest mass may travel at the speed of light, and that nothing may travel faster.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Light</span> Electromagnetic radiation humans can see

Light, visible light, or visible radiation is electromagnetic radiation that can be perceived by the human eye. Visible light spans the visible spectrum and is usually defined as having wavelengths in the range of 400–700 nanometres (nm), corresponding to frequencies of 750–420 terahertz. The visible band sits adjacent to the infrared and the ultraviolet, called collectively optical radiation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luminiferous aether</span> Obsolete postulated medium for the propagation of light

Luminiferous aether or ether was the postulated medium for the propagation of light. It was invoked to explain the ability of the apparently wave-based light to propagate through empty space, something that waves should not be able to do. The assumption of a spatial plenum of luminiferous aether, rather than a spatial vacuum, provided the theoretical medium that was required by wave theories of light.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Motion</span> Change in the position of an object

In physics, motion is when an object changes its position with respect to a reference point in a given time. Motion is mathematically described in terms of displacement, distance, velocity, acceleration, speed, and frame of reference to an observer, measuring the change in position of the body relative to that frame with a change in time. The branch of physics describing the motion of objects without reference to their cause is called kinematics, while the branch studying forces and their effect on motion is called dynamics.

A physical constant, sometimes fundamental physical constant or universal constant, is a physical quantity that cannot be explained by a theory and therefore must be measured experimentally. It is distinct from a mathematical constant, which has a fixed numerical value, but does not directly involve any physical measurement.

A photon is an elementary particle that is a quantum of the electromagnetic field, including electromagnetic radiation such as light and radio waves, and the force carrier for the electromagnetic force. Photons are massless particles that always move at the speed of light when in vacuum. The photon belongs to the class of boson particles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Special relativity</span> Theory of interwoven space and time by Albert Einstein

In physics, the special theory of relativity, or special relativity for short, is a scientific theory of the relationship between space and time. In Albert Einstein's 1905 treatment, the theory is presented as being based on just two postulates:

  1. The laws of physics are invariant (identical) in all inertial frames of reference.
  2. The speed of light in vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of the motion of light source or observer.
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wave</span> Repeated oscillation around equilibrium

In physics, mathematics, engineering, and related fields, a wave is a propagating dynamic disturbance of one or more quantities. Periodic waves oscillate repeatedly about an equilibrium (resting) value at some frequency. When the entire waveform moves in one direction, it is said to be a traveling wave; by contrast, a pair of superimposed periodic waves traveling in opposite directions makes a standing wave. In a standing wave, the amplitude of vibration has nulls at some positions where the wave amplitude appears smaller or even zero. Waves are often described by a wave equation or a one-way wave equation for single wave propagation in a defined direction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gravity</span> Attraction of masses and energy

In physics, gravity (from Latin gravitas 'weight') is a fundamental interaction which causes mutual attraction between all things that have mass. Gravity is, by far, the weakest of the four fundamental interactions, approximately 1038 times weaker than the strong interaction, 1036 times weaker than the electromagnetic force and 1029 times weaker than the weak interaction. As a result, it has no significant influence at the level of subatomic particles. However, gravity is the most significant interaction between objects at the macroscopic scale, and it determines the motion of planets, stars, galaxies, and even light.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fine-structure constant</span> Dimensionless number that quantifies the strength of the electromagnetic interaction

In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as the Sommerfeld constant, commonly denoted by α, is a fundamental physical constant which quantifies the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zero-point energy</span> Lowest possible energy of a quantum system or field

Zero-point energy (ZPE) is the lowest possible energy that a quantum mechanical system may have. Unlike in classical mechanics, quantum systems constantly fluctuate in their lowest energy state as described by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Therefore, even at absolute zero, atoms and molecules retain some vibrational motion. Apart from atoms and molecules, the empty space of the vacuum also has these properties. According to quantum field theory, the universe can be thought of not as isolated particles but continuous fluctuating fields: matter fields, whose quanta are fermions, and force fields, whose quanta are bosons. All these fields have zero-point energy. These fluctuating zero-point fields lead to a kind of reintroduction of an aether in physics since some systems can detect the existence of this energy. However, this aether cannot be thought of as a physical medium if it is to be Lorentz invariant such that there is no contradiction with Einstein's theory of special relativity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wavenumber</span> Spatial frequency of a wave

In the physical sciences, the wavenumber, also known as repetency, is the spatial frequency of a wave, measured in cycles per unit distance or radians per unit distance. It is analogous to temporal frequency, which is defined as the number of wave cycles per unit time or radians per unit time.

Matter waves are a central part of the theory of quantum mechanics, being half of wave–particle duality. At all scales where measurements have been practical, matter exhibits wave-like behavior. For example, a beam of electrons can be diffracted just like a beam of light or a water wave.

Quantum mechanics is the study of matter and its interactions with energy on the scale of atomic and subatomic particles. By contrast, classical physics explains matter and energy only on a scale familiar to human experience, including the behavior of astronomical bodies such as the moon. Classical physics is still used in much of modern science and technology. However, towards the end of the 19th century, scientists discovered phenomena in both the large (macro) and the small (micro) worlds that classical physics could not explain. The desire to resolve inconsistencies between observed phenomena and classical theory led to a revolution in physics, a shift in the original scientific paradigm: the development of quantum mechanics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gravitational wave</span> Propagating spacetime ripple

Gravitational waves are waves of the intensity of gravity that are generated by the accelerated masses of binary stars and other motions of gravitating masses, and propagate as waves outward from their source at the speed of light. They were first proposed by Oliver Heaviside in 1893 and then later by Henri Poincaré in 1905 as the gravitational equivalent of electromagnetic waves. Gravitational waves are sometimes called gravity waves, but gravity waves typically refer to displacement waves in fluids. In 1916 Albert Einstein demonstrated that gravitational waves result from his general theory of relativity as ripples in spacetime.

In classical theories of gravitation, the changes in a gravitational field propagate. A change in the distribution of energy and momentum of matter results in subsequent alteration, at a distance, of the gravitational field which it produces. In the relativistic sense, the "speed of gravity" refers to the speed of a gravitational wave, which, as predicted by general relativity and confirmed by observation of the GW170817 neutron star merger, is equal to the speed of light (c).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cherenkov radiation</span> Electromagnetic radiation from a charged particle in a medium

Cherenkov radiation is electromagnetic radiation emitted when a charged particle passes through a dielectric medium at a speed greater than the phase velocity of light in that medium. A classic example of Cherenkov radiation is the characteristic blue glow of an underwater nuclear reactor. Its cause is similar to the cause of a sonic boom, the sharp sound heard when faster-than-sound movement occurs. The phenomenon is named after Soviet physicist Pavel Cherenkov.

In particle physics and physical cosmology, Planck units are a system of units of measurement defined exclusively in terms of four universal physical constants: c, G, ħ, and kB. Expressing one of these physical constants in terms of Planck units yields a numerical value of 1. They are a system of natural units, defined using fundamental properties of nature rather than properties of a chosen prototype object. Originally proposed in 1899 by German physicist Max Planck, they are relevant in research on unified theories such as quantum gravity.

In physics, natural unit systems are measurement systems for which certain physical constants have been set to 1 through nondimensionalization of physical units. For example, the speed of light c may be set to 1, and it may then be omitted, equating mass and energy directly E=m rather than using c as a conversion factor in the typical mass–energy equivalence equation E=mc2. A purely natural system of units has all of its dimensions collapsed, such that the physical constants completely define the system of units and the relevant physical laws contain no conversion constants.


  1. Larson, Ron; Hostetler, Robert P. (2007). Elementary and Intermediate Algebra: A Combined Course, Student Support Edition (4th illustrated ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 197. ISBN   978-0-618-75354-3.
  2. 1 2 "Definitions of the SI base units". physics.nist.gov. 29 May 2019. Retrieved 8 February 2022.
  3. Penrose, R (2004). The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. Vintage Books. pp.  410–411. ISBN   978-0-679-77631-4. ... the most accurate standard for the metre is conveniently defined so that there are exactly 299792458 of them to the distance travelled by light in a standard second, giving a value for the metre that very accurately matches the now inadequately precise standard metre rule in Paris.
  4. Moses Fayngold (2008). Special Relativity and How it Works (illustrated ed.). John Wiley & Sons. p. 497. ISBN   978-3-527-40607-4. Extract of page 497.
  5. Albert Shadowitz (1988). Special Relativity (revised ed.). Courier Corporation. p. 79. ISBN   978-0-486-65743-1. Extract of page 79.
  6. Peres, Asher; Terno, Daniel R. (6 January 2004). "Quantum information and relativity theory". Reviews of Modern Physics. 76 (1): 93–123. arXiv: quant-ph/0212023 . Bibcode:2004RvMP...76...93P. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.93. ISSN   0034-6861. S2CID   7481797.
  7. Gibbs, Philip (1997). "How is the speed of light measured?". The Physics and Relativity FAQ. Archived from the original on 21 August 2015.
  8. 1 2 Stachel, J. J. (2002). Einstein from "B" to "Z" – Volume 9 of Einstein studies. Springer. p. 226. ISBN   978-0-8176-4143-6.
  9. See, for example:
  10. Gibbs, P. (2004) [1997]. "Why is c the symbol for the speed of light?". Usenet Physics FAQ. University of California, Riverside. Archived from the original on 25 March 2010. Retrieved 16 November 2009. "The origins of the letter c being used for the speed of light can be traced back to a paper of 1856 by Weber and Kohlrausch [...] Weber apparently meant c to stand for 'constant' in his force law, but there is evidence that physicists such as Lorentz and Einstein were accustomed to a common convention that c could be used as a variable for velocity. This usage can be traced back to the classic Latin texts in which c stood for 'celeritas', meaning 'speed'."
  11. Mendelson, K. S. (2006). "The story of c". American Journal of Physics . 74 (11): 995–997. Bibcode:2006AmJPh..74..995M. doi:10.1119/1.2238887.
  12. See, for example:
  13. International Bureau of Weights and Measures (2006), The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (8th ed.), p. 112, ISBN   92-822-2213-6, archived (PDF) from the original on 4 June 2021, retrieved 16 December 2021
  14. 1 2 See, for example:
  15. Mermin, N. David (2005). It's About Time: Understanding Einstein's Relativity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 22. ISBN   0-691-12201-6. OCLC   57283944.
  16. "Nanoseconds Associated with Grace Hopper". National Museum of American History . Retrieved 1 March 2022. Grace Murray Hopper (1906–1992), a mathematician who became a naval officer and computer scientist during World War II, started distributing these wire "nanoseconds" in the late 1960s in order to demonstrate how designing smaller components would produce faster computers.
  17. Lawrie, I. D. (2002). "Appendix C: Natural units". A Unified Grand Tour of Theoretical Physics (2nd ed.). CRC Press. p. 540. ISBN   978-0-7503-0604-1.
  18. Hsu, L. (2006). "Appendix A: Systems of units and the development of relativity theories". A Broader View of Relativity: General Implications of Lorentz and Poincaré Invariance (2nd ed.). World Scientific. pp. 427–428. ISBN   978-981-256-651-5.
  19. Einstein, A. (1905). "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper". Annalen der Physik (Submitted manuscript) (in German). 17 (10): 890–921. Bibcode:1905AnP...322..891E. doi: 10.1002/andp.19053221004 . English translation: Perrett, W. Walker, J (ed.). "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies". Fourmilab . Translated by Jeffery, G. B. Retrieved 27 November 2009.
  20. 1 2 Hsu, J.-P.; Zhang, Y. Z. (2001). Lorentz and Poincaré Invariance. Advanced Series on Theoretical Physical Science. Vol. 8. World Scientific. pp. 543ff. ISBN   978-981-02-4721-8.
  21. 1 2 3 Zhang, Y. Z. (1997). Special Relativity and Its Experimental Foundations. Advanced Series on Theoretical Physical Science. Vol. 4. World Scientific. pp.  172–173. ISBN   978-981-02-2749-4 . Retrieved 23 July 2009.
  22. d'Inverno, R. (1992). Introducing Einstein's Relativity. Oxford University Press. pp.  19–20. ISBN   978-0-19-859686-8.
  23. Sriranjan, B. (2004). "Postulates of the special theory of relativity and their consequences". The Special Theory to Relativity. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. pp. 20ff. ISBN   978-81-203-1963-9.
  24. 1 2 Ellis, George F. R.; Williams, Ruth M. (2000). Flat and Curved Space-times (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 12. ISBN   0-19-850657-0. OCLC   44694623.
  25. Antonioli, Pietro; Fienberg, Richard Tresch; Fleurot, Fabrice; Fukuda, Yoshiyuki; Fulgione, Walter; Habig, Alec; Heise, Jaret; McDonald, Arthur B.; Mills, Corrinne; Namba, Toshio; Robinson, Leif J. (2 September 2004). "SNEWS: the SuperNova Early Warning System". New Journal of Physics . 6: 114. arXiv: astro-ph/0406214 . Bibcode:2004NJPh....6..114A. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/114. ISSN   1367-2630. S2CID   119431247.
  26. Roberts, T.; Schleif, S. (2007). Dlugosz, J. M. (ed.). "What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity?". Usenet Physics FAQ. University of California, Riverside. Archived from the original on 15 October 2009. Retrieved 27 November 2009.
  27. Terrell, J. (1959). "Invisibility of the Lorentz Contraction". Physical Review . 116 (4): 1041–1045. Bibcode:1959PhRv..116.1041T. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.116.1041.
  28. Penrose, R. (1959). "The Apparent Shape of a Relativistically Moving Sphere". Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society . 55 (1): 137–139. Bibcode:1959PCPS...55..137P. doi:10.1017/S0305004100033776. S2CID   123023118.
  29. Hartle, J. B. (2003). Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity. Addison-Wesley. pp.  52–59. ISBN   978-981-02-2749-4.
  30. Hartle, J. B. (2003). Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity . Addison-Wesley. p. 332. ISBN   978-981-02-2749-4.
  31. See, for example:
  32. 1 2 Gibbs, P. (1997) [1996]. Carlip, S. (ed.). "Is The Speed of Light Constant?". Usenet Physics FAQ. University of California, Riverside. Archived from the original on 2 April 2010. Retrieved 26 November 2009.
  33. Ellis, G. F. R.; Uzan, J.-P. (2005). "'c' is the speed of light, isn't it?". American Journal of Physics . 73 (3): 240–227. arXiv: gr-qc/0305099 . Bibcode:2005AmJPh..73..240E. doi:10.1119/1.1819929. S2CID   119530637. The possibility that the fundamental constants may vary during the evolution of the universe offers an exceptional window onto higher dimensional theories and is probably linked with the nature of the dark energy that makes the universe accelerate today.
  34. Mota, D. F. (2006). Variations of the Fine Structure Constant in Space and Time (PhD). arXiv: astro-ph/0401631 . Bibcode:2004astro.ph..1631M.
  35. Uzan, J.-P. (2003). "The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations". Reviews of Modern Physics . 75 (2): 403. arXiv: hep-ph/0205340 . Bibcode:2003RvMP...75..403U. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.403. S2CID   118684485.
  36. Amelino-Camelia, G. (2013). "Quantum Gravity Phenomenology". Living Reviews in Relativity. 16 (1): 5. arXiv: 0806.0339 . Bibcode:2013LRR....16....5A. doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-5. PMC   5255913 . PMID   28179844.
  37. Herrmann, S.; Senger, A.; Möhle, K.; Nagel, M.; Kovalchuk, E. V.; Peters, A. (2009). "Rotating optical cavity experiment testing Lorentz invariance at the 10−17 level". Physical Review D. 80 (100): 105011. arXiv: 1002.1284 . Bibcode:2009PhRvD..80j5011H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.105011. S2CID   118346408.
  38. Lang, K. R. (1999). Astrophysical formulae (3rd ed.). Birkhäuser. p. 152. ISBN   978-3-540-29692-8.
  39. See, for example:
  40. Fowler, M. (March 2008). "Notes on Special Relativity" (PDF). University of Virginia. p. 56. Retrieved 7 May 2010.
  41. See, for example:
  42. Liberati, S.; Sonego, S.; Visser, M. (2002). "Faster-than-c signals, special relativity, and causality". Annals of Physics . 298 (1): 167–185. arXiv: gr-qc/0107091 . Bibcode:2002AnPhy.298..167L. doi:10.1006/aphy.2002.6233. S2CID   48166.
  43. Taylor, E. F.; Wheeler, J. A. (1992). Spacetime Physics. W. H. Freeman. pp.  74–75. ISBN   978-0-7167-2327-1.
  44. Tolman, R. C. (2009) [1917]. "Velocities greater than that of light". The Theory of the Relativity of Motion (Reprint ed.). BiblioLife. p. 54. ISBN   978-1-103-17233-7.
  45. Hecht, E. (1987). Optics (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley. p. 62. ISBN   978-0-201-11609-0.
  46. Quimby, R. S. (2006). Photonics and lasers: an introduction. John Wiley and Sons. p. 9. ISBN   978-0-471-71974-8.
  47. Wertheim, M. (20 June 2007). "The Shadow Goes". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 August 2009.
  48. 1 2 3 Gibbs, P. (1997). "Is Faster-Than-Light Travel or Communication Possible?". Usenet Physics FAQ. University of California, Riverside. Archived from the original on 10 March 2010. Retrieved 20 August 2008.
  49. See, for example:
  50. Muga, J. G.; Mayato, R. S.; Egusquiza, I. L., eds. (2007). Time in Quantum Mechanics. Springer. p. 48. ISBN   978-3-540-73472-7.
  51. Hernández-Figueroa, H. E.; Zamboni-Rached, M.; Recami, E. (2007). Localized Waves. Wiley Interscience. p. 26. ISBN   978-0-470-10885-7.
  52. Wynne, K. (2002). "Causality and the nature of information" (PDF). Optics Communications . 209 (1–3): 84–100. Bibcode:2002OptCo.209...85W. doi:10.1016/S0030-4018(02)01638-3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 March 2009.
  53. Rees, M. (1966). "The Appearance of Relativistically Expanding Radio Sources". Nature . 211 (5048): 468. Bibcode:1966Natur.211..468R. doi:10.1038/211468a0. S2CID   41065207.
  54. Chase, I. P. "Apparent Superluminal Velocity of Galaxies". Usenet Physics FAQ. University of California, Riverside . Retrieved 26 November 2009.
  55. Reich, Eugenie Samuel (2 April 2012). "Embattled neutrino project leaders step down". Nature News . doi:10.1038/nature.2012.10371. S2CID   211730430 . Retrieved 11 February 2022.
  56. OPERA Collaboration (12 July 2012). "Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam". Journal of High Energy Physics . 2012 (10): 93. arXiv: 1109.4897 . Bibcode:2012JHEP...10..093A. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2012)093. S2CID   17652398.
  57. Harrison, E. R. (2003). Masks of the Universe. Cambridge University Press. p. 206. ISBN   978-0-521-77351-5.
  58. Panofsky, W. K. H.; Phillips, M. (1962). Classical Electricity and Magnetism . Addison-Wesley. p.  182. ISBN   978-0-201-05702-7.
  59. See, for example:
  60. 1 2 Adelberger, E.; Dvali, G.; Gruzinov, A. (2007). "Photon Mass Bound Destroyed by Vortices". Physical Review Letters. 98 (1): 010402. arXiv: hep-ph/0306245 . Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98a0402A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.010402. PMID   17358459. S2CID   31249827.
  61. Sidharth, B. G. (2008). The Thermodynamic Universe. World Scientific. p. 134. ISBN   978-981-281-234-6.
  62. Amelino-Camelia, G. (2009). "Astrophysics: Burst of support for relativity". Nature . 462 (7271): 291–292. Bibcode:2009Natur.462..291A. doi: 10.1038/462291a . PMID   19924200. S2CID   205051022.
  63. 1 2 3 Milonni, Peter W. (2004). Fast light, slow light and left-handed light. CRC Press. pp. 25 ff. ISBN   978-0-7503-0926-4.
  64. de Podesta, M. (2002). Understanding the Properties of Matter. CRC Press. p. 131. ISBN   978-0-415-25788-6.
  65. "Optical constants of H2O, D2O (Water, heavy water, ice)". refractiveindex.info. Mikhail Polyanskiy. Retrieved 7 November 2017.
  66. "Optical constants of Soda lime glass". refractiveindex.info. Mikhail Polyanskiy. Retrieved 7 November 2017.
  67. "Optical constants of C (Carbon, diamond, graphite)". refractiveindex.info. Mikhail Polyanskiy. Retrieved 7 November 2017.
  68. Cromie, William J. (24 January 2001). "Researchers now able to stop, restart light". Harvard University Gazette. Archived from the original on 28 October 2011. Retrieved 8 November 2011.
  69. Milonni, P. W. (2004). Fast light, slow light and left-handed light. CRC Press. p. 25. ISBN   978-0-7503-0926-4.
  70. Toll, J. S. (1956). "Causality and the Dispersion Relation: Logical Foundations". Physical Review . 104 (6): 1760–1770. Bibcode:1956PhRv..104.1760T. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.104.1760.
  71. Wolf, Emil (2001). "Analyticity, Causality and Dispersion Relations". Selected Works of Emil Wolf: with commentary. River Edge, N.J.: World Scientific. pp. 577–584. ISBN   978-981-281-187-5. OCLC   261134839.
  72. Libbrecht, K. G.; Libbrecht, M. W. (December 2006). "Interferometric measurement of the resonant absorption and refractive index in rubidium gas" (PDF). American Journal of Physics. 74 (12): 1055–1060. Bibcode:2006AmJPh..74.1055L. doi:10.1119/1.2335476. ISSN   0002-9505.
  73. See, for example:
  74. See, for example:
  75. Cherenkov, Pavel A. (1934). "Видимое свечение чистых жидкостей под действием γ-радиации" [Visible emission of pure liquids by action of γ radiation]. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR . 2: 451. Reprinted: Cherenkov, P. A. (1967). "Видимое свечение чистых жидкостей под действием γ-радиации" [Visible emission of pure liquids by action of γ radiation]. Usp. Fiz. Nauk. 93 (10): 385. doi:10.3367/ufnr.0093.196710n.0385., and in A. N. Gorbunov; E. P. Čerenkova, eds. (1999). Pavel Alekseyevich Čerenkov: Chelovek i Otkrytie[Pavel Alekseyevich Čerenkov: Man and Discovery]. Moscow: Nauka. pp. 149–153.
  76. Parhami, B. (1999). Introduction to parallel processing: algorithms and architectures. Plenum Press. p. 5. ISBN   978-0-306-45970-2.
  77. Imbs, D.; Raynal, Michel (2009). Malyshkin, V. (ed.). Software Transactional Memories: An Approach for Multicore Programming. 10th International Conference, PaCT 2009, Novosibirsk, Russia, 31 August – 4 September 2009. Springer. p. 26. ISBN   978-3-642-03274-5.
  78. Midwinter, J. E. (1991). Optical Fibers for Transmission (2nd ed.). Krieger Publishing Company. ISBN   978-0-89464-595-2.
  79. "Theoretical vs real-world speed limit of Ping". Pingdom. June 2007. Archived from the original on 2 September 2010. Retrieved 5 May 2010.
  80. Buchanan, Mark (11 February 2015). "Physics in finance: Trading at the speed of light". Nature. 518 (7538): 161–163. Bibcode:2015Natur.518..161B. doi: 10.1038/518161a . PMID   25673397.
  81. "Time is money when it comes to microwaves" . Financial Times. 10 May 2013. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 25 April 2014.
  82. "Day 4: Lunar Orbits 7, 8 and 9". The Apollo 8 Flight Journal. NASA. Archived from the original on 4 January 2011. Retrieved 16 December 2010.
  83. "Communications". Mars 2020 Mission Perseverance Rover. NASA. Retrieved 14 March 2020.
  84. 1 2 "Hubble Reaches the "Undiscovered Country" of Primeval Galaxies" (Press release). Space Telescope Science Institute. 5 January 2010.
  85. "The Hubble Ultra Deep Field Lithograph" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved 4 February 2010.
  86. Mack, Katie (2021). The End of Everything (Astrophysically Speaking). London: Penguin Books. pp. 18–19. ISBN   978-0-141-98958-7. OCLC   1180972461.
  87. "The IAU and astronomical units". International Astronomical Union . Retrieved 11 October 2010.
  88. Further discussion can be found at "StarChild Question of the Month for March 2000". StarChild. NASA. 2000. Retrieved 22 August 2009.
  89. Dickey, J. O.; et al. (July 1994). "Lunar Laser Ranging: A Continuing Legacy of the Apollo Program" (PDF). Science. 265 (5171): 482–490. Bibcode:1994Sci...265..482D. doi:10.1126/science.265.5171.482. PMID   17781305. S2CID   10157934.
  90. Standish, E. M. (February 1982). "The JPL planetary ephemerides". Celestial Mechanics. 26 (2): 181–186. Bibcode:1982CeMec..26..181S. doi:10.1007/BF01230883. S2CID   121966516.
  91. Berner, J. B.; Bryant, S. H.; Kinman, P. W. (November 2007). "Range Measurement as Practiced in the Deep Space Network" (PDF). Proceedings of the IEEE. 95 (11): 2202–2214. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2007.905128. S2CID   12149700.
  92. 1 2 3 "Resolution 1 of the 17th CGPM". BIPM. 1983. Retrieved 23 August 2009.
  93. 1 2 3 Cohen, I. B. (1940). "Roemer and the first determination of the velocity of light (1676)". Isis . 31 (2): 327–379. doi:10.1086/347594. hdl: 2027/uc1.b4375710 . S2CID   145428377.
  94. 1 2 3 "Demonstration tovchant le mouvement de la lumiere trouvé par M. Rŏmer de l'Académie Royale des Sciences" [Demonstration to the movement of light found by Mr. Römer of the Royal Academy of Sciences](PDF). Journal des sçavans (in French): 233–236. 1676.
    Translated in "A demonstration concerning the motion of light, communicated from Paris, in the Journal des Sçavans, and here made English". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society . 12 (136): 893–895. 1677. Bibcode:1677RSPT...12..893.. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1677.0024 .
    Reproduced in Hutton, C.; Shaw, G.; Pearson, R., eds. (1809). "On the Motion of Light by M. Romer". The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, from Their Commencement in 1665, in the Year 1800: Abridged. Vol. II. From 1673 to 1682. London: C. & R. Baldwin. pp. 397–398.
    The account published in Journal des sçavans was based on a report that Rømer read to the French Academy of Sciences in November 1676 (Cohen, 1940, p. 346).
  95. 1 2 3 4 Bradley, J. (1729). "Account of a new discovered Motion of the Fix'd Stars". Philosophical Transactions . 35: 637–660.
  96. Duffett-Smith, P. (1988). Practical Astronomy with your Calculator . Cambridge University Press. p.  62. ISBN   978-0-521-35699-2. Extract of page 62.
  97. 1 2 "Resolution B2 on the re-definition of the astronomical unit of length" (PDF). International Astronomical Union. 2012.
  98. "Supplement 2014: Updates to the 8th edition (2006) of the SI Brochure" (PDF). The International System of Units. International Bureau of Weights and Measures: 14. 2014.
  99. International Bureau of Weights and Measures (2006), The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (8th ed.), p. 126, ISBN   92-822-2213-6, archived (PDF) from the original on 4 June 2021, retrieved 16 December 2021
  100. Brumfiel, Geoff (14 September 2012). "The astronomical unit gets fixed". Nature . doi:10.1038/nature.2012.11416. ISSN   1476-4687. S2CID   123424704.
  101. See the following:
  102. 1 2 IAU Working Group on Numerical Standards for Fundamental Astronomy. "IAU WG on NSFA Current Best Estimates". US Naval Observatory. Archived from the original on 8 December 2009. Retrieved 25 September 2009.
  103. "NPL's Beginner's Guide to Length". UK National Physical Laboratory. Archived from the original on 31 August 2010. Retrieved 28 October 2009.
  104. 1 2 3 4 5 Gibbs, P. (1997). "How is the speed of light measured?". Usenet Physics FAQ. University of California, Riverside. Archived from the original on 21 August 2015. Retrieved 13 January 2010.
  105. Fowler, M. "The Speed of Light". University of Virginia. Retrieved 21 April 2010.
  106. Hughes, Stephan (2012). Catchers of the Light: The Forgotten Lives of the Men and Women Who First Photographed the Heavens. ArtDeCiel Publishing. p. 210. ISBN   978-1-62050-961-6.
  107. See, for example:
  108. 1 2 3 4 5 Essen, L.; Gordon-Smith, A. C. (1948). "The Velocity of Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves Derived from the Resonant Frequencies of a Cylindrical Cavity Resonator". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A . 194 (1038): 348–361. Bibcode:1948RSPSA.194..348E. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1948.0085 . JSTOR   98293.
  109. 1 2 Rosa, E. B.; Dorsey, N. E. (1907). "A new determination of the ratio of the electromagnetic to the electrostatic unit of electricity". Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. 3 (6): 433. doi: 10.6028/bulletin.070 .
  110. Essen, L. (1947). "Velocity of Electromagnetic Waves". Nature. 159 (4044): 611–612. Bibcode:1947Natur.159..611E. doi:10.1038/159611a0. S2CID   4101717.
  111. 1 2 3 Essen, L. (1950). "The Velocity of Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves Derived from the Resonant Frequencies of a Cylindrical Cavity Resonator". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A . 204 (1077): 260–277. Bibcode:1950RSPSA.204..260E. doi:10.1098/rspa.1950.0172. JSTOR   98433. S2CID   121261770.
  112. Stauffer, R. H. (April 1997). "Finding the Speed of Light with Marshmallows". The Physics Teacher . 35 (4): 231. Bibcode:1997PhTea..35..231S. doi:10.1119/1.2344657 . Retrieved 15 February 2010.
  113. "BBC Look East at the speed of light". BBC Norfolk website. Retrieved 15 February 2010.
  114. Vaughan, J. M. (1989). The Fabry-Perot interferometer. CRC Press. pp. 47, 384–391. ISBN   978-0-85274-138-2.
  115. 1 2 Froome, K. D. (1958). "A New Determination of the Free-Space Velocity of Electromagnetic Waves". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 247 (1248): 109–122. Bibcode:1958RSPSA.247..109F. doi:10.1098/rspa.1958.0172. JSTOR   100591. S2CID   121444888.
  116. 1 2 3 Sullivan, D. B. (2001). "Speed of Light from Direct Frequency and Wavelength Measurements". In Lide, D. R. (ed.). A Century of Excellence in Measurements, Standards, and Technology (PDF). CRC Press. pp. 191–193. ISBN   978-0-8493-1247-2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 August 2009.
  117. 1 2 3 Evenson, K. M.; et al. (1972). "Speed of Light from Direct Frequency and Wavelength Measurements of the Methane-Stabilized Laser". Physical Review Letters. 29 (19): 1346–1349. Bibcode:1972PhRvL..29.1346E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.1346. S2CID   120300510.
  118. 1 2 Galilei, G. (1954) [1638]. Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences. Crew, H.; de Salvio A. (trans.). Dover Publications. p. 43. ISBN   978-0-486-60099-4. Archived from the original on 30 January 2019. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
  119. 1 2 3 Boyer, C. B. (1941). "Early Estimates of the Velocity of Light". Isis . 33 (1): 24. doi:10.1086/358523. S2CID   145400212.
  120. 1 2 Foschi, Renato; Leone, Matteo (2009), "Galileo, measurement of the velocity of light, and the reaction times", Perception, 38 (8): 1251–1259, doi:10.1068/p6263, hdl: 2318/132957 , PMID   19817156, S2CID   11747908
  121. Magalotti, Lorenzo (2001) [1667], Saggi di Naturali Esperienze fatte nell' Accademia del Cimento (digital, online ed.), Florence: Istituto e Museo di Storia delle Scienze, pp.  265266 , retrieved 25 September 2015
  122. 1 2 Huygens, C. (1690). Traitée de la Lumière (in French). Pierre van der Aa. pp.  8–9.
  123. Buchwald, Jed; Yeang, Chen-Pang; Stemeroff, Noah; Barton, Jenifer; Harrington, Quinn (1 March 2021). "What Heinrich Hertz discovered about electric waves in 1887–1888". Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 75 (2): 125–171. doi:10.1007/s00407-020-00260-1. ISSN   1432-0657. S2CID   253895826.
  124. Hertz, Heinrich (1893). Electric Waves. London: Macmillan and Co.
  125. Michelson, A. A. (1927). "Measurement of the Velocity of Light Between Mount Wilson and Mount San Antonio". The Astrophysical Journal. 65: 1. Bibcode:1927ApJ....65....1M. doi:10.1086/143021.
  126. Weiner, John; Nunes, Frederico (2013). Light-Matter Interaction: Physics and Engineering at the Nanoscale (illustrated ed.). OUP Oxford. p. 1. ISBN   978-0-19-856766-0. Extract of page 1.
  127. Sarton, G. (1993). Ancient science through the golden age of Greece. Courier Dover. p. 248. ISBN   978-0-486-27495-9.
  128. 1 2 3 MacKay, R. H.; Oldford, R. W. (2000). "Scientific Method, Statistical Method and the Speed of Light". Statistical Science . 15 (3): 254–278. doi: 10.1214/ss/1009212817 . (click on "Historical background" in the table of contents)
  129. Ahmed, Sherif Sayed (2014). Electronic Microwave Imaging with Planar Multistatic Arrays. Logos Verlag Berlin. p. 1. ISBN   978-3-8325-3621-3. Extract of page 1
  130. Gross, C. G. (1999). "The Fire That Comes from the Eye". Neuroscientist. 5: 58–64. doi:10.1177/107385849900500108. S2CID   84148912.
  131. Hamarneh, S. (1972). "Review: Hakim Mohammed Said, Ibn al-Haitham". Isis . 63 (1): 119. doi:10.1086/350861.
  132. 1 2 Lester, P. M. (2005). Visual Communication: Images With Messages. Thomson Wadsworth. pp. 10–11. ISBN   978-0-534-63720-0.
  133. O'Connor, J. J.; Robertson, E. F. "Abu Ali al-Hasan ibn al-Haytham". MacTutor History of Mathematics archive . University of St Andrews . Retrieved 12 January 2010.
  134. Lauginie, P. (2004). Measuring Speed of Light: Why? Speed of what? (PDF). Fifth International Conference for History of Science in Science Education. Keszthely, Hungary. pp. 75–84. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 July 2015. Retrieved 12 August 2017.
  135. O'Connor, J. J.; Robertson, E. F. "Abu han Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Biruni". MacTutor History of Mathematics archive. University of St Andrews. Retrieved 12 January 2010.
  136. Lindberg, D. C. (1996). Roger Bacon and the origins of Perspectiva in the Middle Ages: a critical edition and English translation of Bacon's Perspectiva, with introduction and notes. Oxford University Press. p. 143. ISBN   978-0-19-823992-5.
  137. Lindberg, D. C. (1974). "Late Thirteenth-Century Synthesis in Optics". In Edward Grant (ed.). A source book in medieval science. Harvard University Press. p. 396. ISBN   978-0-674-82360-0.
  138. Marshall, P. (1981). "Nicole Oresme on the Nature, Reflection, and Speed of Light". Isis . 72 (3): 357–374 [367–374]. doi:10.1086/352787. S2CID   144035661.
  139. Sakellariadis, Spyros (1982). "Descartes' Experimental Proof of the Infinite Velocity of Light and Huygens' Rejoinder". Archive for History of Exact Sciences . 26 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1007/BF00348308. ISSN   0003-9519. JSTOR   41133639. S2CID   118187860.
  140. Cajori, Florian (1922). A History of Physics in Its Elementary Branches: Including the Evolution of Physical Laboratories. Macmillan. p. 76.
  141. Smith, A. Mark (1987). "Descartes's Theory of Light and Refraction: A Discourse on Method". Transactions of the American Philosophical Society . 77 (3): i–92. doi:10.2307/1006537. ISSN   0065-9746. JSTOR   1006537.
  142. Boyer, Carl Benjamin (1959). The Rainbow: From Myth to Mathematics. Thomas Yoseloff. pp. 205–206. OCLC   763848561.
  143. Foschi, Renato; Leone, Matteo (August 2009). "Galileo, Measurement of the Velocity of Light, and the Reaction Times". Perception. 38 (8): 1251–1259. doi:10.1068/p6263. hdl: 2318/132957 . ISSN   0301-0066. PMID   19817156. S2CID   11747908.
  144. Newton, I. (1704). "Prop. XI". Optiks. The text of Prop. XI is identical between the first (1704) and second (1719) editions.
  145. Guarnieri, M. (2015). "Two Millennia of Light: The Long Path to Maxwell's Waves". IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine. 9 (2): 54–56, 60. doi:10.1109/MIE.2015.2421754. S2CID   20759821.
  146. Kirchhoff, G. (1857). "Über die Bewegung der Elektricität". Ann. Phys. 178 (12): 529–244. Bibcode:1857AnP...178..529K. doi:10.1002/andp.18571781203.
  147. See, for example:
  148. O'Connor, J. J.; Robertson, E. F. (November 1997). "James Clerk Maxwell". School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews. Archived from the original on 28 January 2011. Retrieved 13 October 2010.
  149. Campbell, Lewis; Garnett, William; Rautio, James C. "The Life of James Clerk Maxwell", p. 544, ISBN   978-1773751399.
  150. Watson, E. C. (1 September 1957). "On the Relations between Light and Electricity". American Journal of Physics. 25 (6): 335–343. Bibcode:1957AmJPh..25..335W. doi:10.1119/1.1934460. ISSN   0002-9505.
  151. Consoli, Maurizio; Pluchino, Alessandro (2018). Michelson-Morley Experiments: An Enigma for Physics & The History of Science. World Scientific. pp. 118–119. ISBN   978-9-813-27818-9 . Retrieved 4 May 2020.
  152. Michelson, A. A.; Morley, E. W. (1887). "On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether". American Journal of Science . 34 (203): 333–345. doi:10.1366/0003702874447824. S2CID   98374065.
  153. French, A. P. (1983). Special relativity. Van Nostrand Reinhold. pp. 51–57. ISBN   978-0-442-30782-0.
  154. Darrigol, O. (2000). Electrodynamics from Ampére to Einstein . Clarendon Press. ISBN   978-0-19-850594-5.
  155. Galison, P. (2003). Einstein's Clocks, Poincaré's Maps: Empires of Time. W. W. Norton. ISBN   978-0-393-32604-8.
  156. Miller, A. I. (1981). Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity. Emergence (1905) and early interpretation (1905–1911) . Addison–Wesley. ISBN   978-0-201-04679-3.
  157. Pais, A. (1982). Subtle is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein . Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-520438-4.
  158. "Resolution 1 of the 15th CGPM". BIPM. 1967. Archived from the original on 11 April 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
  159. "Resolution 6 of the 15th CGPM". BIPM. 1967. Retrieved 13 October 2010.
  160. Barger, R.; Hall, J. (1973). "Wavelength of the 3.39-μm laser-saturated absorption line of methane". Applied Physics Letters. 22 (4): 196. Bibcode:1973ApPhL..22..196B. doi:10.1063/1.1654608. S2CID   1841238.
  161. "Resolution 2 of the 15th CGPM". BIPM. 1975. Retrieved 9 September 2009.
  162. Taylor, E. F.; Wheeler, J. A. (1992). Spacetime Physics: Introduction to Special Relativity (2nd ed.). Macmillan. p. 59. ISBN   978-0-7167-2327-1.
  163. Penzes, W. B. (2009). "Time Line for the Definition of the Meter" (PDF). NIST . Retrieved 11 January 2010.
  164. Adams, S. (1997). Relativity: An Introduction to Space–Time Physics. CRC Press. p. 140. ISBN   978-0-7484-0621-0. One peculiar consequence of this system of definitions is that any future refinement in our ability to measure c will not change the speed of light (which is a defined number), but will change the length of the meter!
  165. Rindler, W. (2006). Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 41. ISBN   978-0-19-856731-8. Note that [...] improvements in experimental accuracy will modify the meter relative to atomic wavelengths, but not the value of the speed of light!
  166. "The "explicit-constant" formulation". BIPM. 2011. Archived from the original on 11 August 2014.
  167. See, for example:

Further reading

Historical references

Modern references