Sulaimon v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform

Last updated
Sulaimon v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform
Coat of arms of Ireland.svg
Court Supreme Court of Ireland
Full case nameFaisol Oluwanifemi Sulaimon (an infant), suing by his Father and Next Friend Fatai A. Ayimla Sulaimon v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform [2012] IESC 63
Decided21 December 2012
Citation(s)[2012] IESC 63
Transcript(s) https://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2012/S63.html
Case history
Appealed fromHigh Court
Appealed toSupreme Court
Court membership
Judges sittingDenham C.J., Murray J., Hardiman J., Fennelly J., O'Donnell J.
Case opinions
The Supreme Court quashed the Minister's decision on the refusal to issue a Certificate of Nationality
Decision byHardiman J.
ConcurrenceDenham C.J., Murray J., Fennelly J.
Keywords
Citizenship; Citizenship (Acquisition of); lus soli; Minor; Residence Permit

Sulaimon v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform [2012] IESC 63; [1] was an Irish Supreme Court case which upheld a judgment of the High Court which had previously quashed the decision of the appellant in this case, the Minister for Justice and Equality on his refusal to grant a minor a Certificate of Nationality. The court held that the respondent's father met the criteria based on citizenship calculation of lawful residence in the State and therefore, was entitled to an Irish passport as an Irish citizen. [1] [2]

Contents

Background

The respondent in this case was a minor. His father sought an Irish passport on his behalf under the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956, which addressed the entitlement to Irish citizenship of persons born to certain non-nationals. The issue was whether the infant respondent was entitled to a certificate of Irish nationality from the Minister of Justice, and where applicable, could he also obtain an Irish passport and be treated as an Irish citizen, like his father and sister. [1] [3]

The minor's application for a passport was based on his father having lawfully resided in the State for five years, who had received two different letters from the Office of the Minister. The first letter (dated 7 July 2005) informed him that the Minister had granted him permission to reside in the country for a period of two years from the date of the letter. The second letter (dated 7 July 2007) granted him a further three years to lawfully reside in the State. [1] In both letters, the respondent's father was instructed to attend Garda National Immigration Bureau in order to get his passport stamped and to update his permission registration, which he did as instructed. After fulfilling the lawful residency criteria for Irish nationality, the respondent's father applied for an Irish passport for him. However, the application for the minor's passport was rejected based on a residency calculation of the applicant's father, which was believed to be 3 days short of the necessary period for the respondent to be eligible for an Irish passport. [4]

Holding of the High Court

The High Court, by way of judicial review, found that the minor was entitled to a Certificate of Nationality on the grounds that his father had fulfilled the necessary time period. The Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform appealed the decision.

Judgement of the Supreme Court

Interpretation of Statutory Provisions

A large part of this case dealt with ascertaining how certain statutes should be interpreted. The following sections of the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 2004 [5] were considered:

Further, the court considered section 6 of the Irish Nationality and Immigration Act 1956, which provides that: "A person born in the island of Ireland shall not be entitled to be an Irish citizen unless a parent of that person has, during the period of four years immediately preceding the person's birth, been resident in the island of Ireland for a period of not less than three years or periods the aggregate of which is not less than three years." [8]

The court placed particular emphasis on section 4 and 5, stating that the Act clearly contemplated that at least two permissions may be identified. The first of these is the permission granted by the Minister and the second is the permission granted by an immigration officer on behalf of the Minister. The Act thus conferred a separate power on the Minister to grant the permission contained in the letters to the applicant's father, and contemplated another power through the immigration officer (agent) acting on the minister's behalf.

The word "permission" under section 5 of the Act, was interpreted to mean that a "ministerial permission" is to be regarded as being of the same nature as the permission granted under Section 4 of the Act. O'Donnell J. decided that the Act correctly recognised that the Minister does have the power to grant permission and the Act does not set out any procedure nor prescribe any particular formality on how such permission should be granted. Therefore, the letter from the Minister is the grant of permission and the Garda National Immigration Bureau's role is to provide the documents evidencing the registration of such permission.

Holding of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court, which confirmed that Mr Sulaimon's periods of residency in the State were sufficient for Naturalization purposes, despite the Garda National Immigration Bureau residency calculation gap. [9] The Supreme Court held that the citizenship calculation of the applicant's father's permission in the state, had met the residency criteria, the logical basis for this decision, is the fact that the Minister for Justice had issued a letter to Mr Sulaimon granting him permission to remain in the state, and that Mr Sulaimon had remained as a legal resident in the state during the permitted period stated in that letter. [9] The judges confirmed that Mr Sulaimon's first permission was operative from when he received the letter indicating that the Minister had granted him permission to reside in the state, therefore, the judges of the Supreme Court dismissed the Minister's arguments and dismissed the appeal. [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States nationality law</span> History and regulations of American citizenship

United States nationality law details the conditions in which a person holds United States nationality. In the United States, nationality is typically obtained through provisions in the U.S. Constitution, various laws, and international agreements. Citizenship is established as a right under the Constitution, not as a privilege, for those born in the United States under its jurisdiction and those who have been "naturalized". While domestic documents often use the words citizenship and nationality interchangeably, nationality is a broader term that refers to national identity and formal membership in a nation, while citizen is reserved to nationals who are have the recognized status of citizenship.

Permanent residency is a person's legal resident status in a country or territory of which such person is not a citizen but where they have the right to reside on a permanent basis. This is usually for a permanent period; a person with such legal status is known as a permanent resident. In the United States, such a person is referred to as a green card holder but more formally as a Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Common Travel Area</span> Open borders area comprising the United Kingdom, Ireland, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands

The Common Travel Area is an open borders area comprising the United Kingdom, Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands. The British Overseas Territories are not included. Based on agreements that are not legally binding, the internal borders of the CTA are subject to minimal controls and can normally be traversed by British and Irish citizens with minimal identity documents. The maintenance of the CTA involves co-operation on immigration matters between the British and Irish authorities.

In law, an alien is any person who is not a citizen or a national of a specific country, although definitions and terminology differ to some degree depending upon the continent or region. More generally, however, the term "alien" is perceived as synonymous with foreign national.

The right of abode is an individual's freedom from immigration control in a particular country. A person who has the right of abode in a country does not need permission from the government to enter the country and can live and work there without restriction, and is immune from removal and deportation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Belonger status</span> Legal status recognizing close ties to a specific territory

Belonger status is a legal classification normally associated with British Overseas Territories. It refers to people who have close ties to a specific territory, normally by birth or ancestry. The requirements for belonger status, and the rights that it confers, vary from territory to territory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South African nationality law</span> Codifies citizenship

South African nationality law details the conditions by which a person is a national of South Africa. The primary law governing nationality requirements is the South African Citizenship Act, 1995, which came into force on 6 October 1995.

Nationality law is the law of a sovereign state, and of each of its jurisdictions, that defines the legal manner in which a national identity is acquired and how it may be lost. In international law, the legal means to acquire nationality and formal membership in a nation are separated from the relationship between a national and the nation, known as citizenship. Some nations domestically use the terms interchangeably, though by the 20th century, nationality had commonly come to mean the status of belonging to a particular nation with no regard to the type of governance which established a relationship between the nation and its people. In law, nationality describes the relationship of a national to the state under international law and citizenship describes the relationship of a citizen within the state under domestic statutes. Different regulatory agencies monitor legal compliance for nationality and citizenship. A person in a country of which he or she is not a national is generally regarded by that country as a foreigner or alien. A person who has no recognised nationality to any jurisdiction is regarded as stateless.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Irish nationality law</span> History and regulations of Irish citizenship

The primary law governing nationality of Ireland is the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act, 1956, which came into force on 17 July 1956. Ireland is a member state of the European Union (EU) and all Irish nationals are EU citizens. They are entitled to free movement rights in EU and European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries and may vote in elections to the European Parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of British nationality law</span> History of United Kingdom citizenship and related concepts

This article concerns the history of British nationality law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British nationality law and the Republic of Ireland</span> Status of citizens of Ireland living in the United Kingdom

Irish citizens in the United Kingdom enjoy a special status when residing there, due to the close proximity of the island of Great Britain and the island of Ireland and the historical ties between the two islands. Irish citizens from the Republic of Ireland are considered to have automatic and permanent permission to live in the United Kingdom and are eligible to vote, stand for public office, and serve in non-reserved government positions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Malaysian nationality law</span> History and regulations of Malaysian citizenship

Malaysian nationality law details the conditions by which a person is a national of Malaysia. The primary law governing nationality requirements is the Constitution of Malaysia, which came into force on 27 August 1957.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Canadian nationality law</span> History of citizenship in Canada

The history of Canadian nationality law dates back over three centuries, and has evolved considerably over that time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Right of abode in the United Kingdom</span> British immigration status

The right of abode (ROA) is an immigration status in the United Kingdom that gives a person the unrestricted right to enter and live in the UK. It was introduced by the Immigration Act 1971 which went into effect on 1 January 1973. This status is held by British citizens, certain British subjects, as well as certain Commonwealth citizens with specific connections to the UK before 1983. Since 1983, it is not possible for a person to acquire this status without being a British citizen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brazilian nationality law</span> History and regulations of Brazilian citizenship

Brazilian nationality law details the conditions by which a person is a national of Brazil. The primary law governing nationality requirements is the 1988 Constitution of Brazil, which came into force on 5 October 1988.

Stamp 4 refers to the stamp number, or immigration status, given to an individual with permission to reside in Ireland. It is issued to people on work visas/work authorisations, to the spouse of an Irish citizen, to the spouse of an EU citizen, to refugees, to people with Irish Born Child residency and those with long-term residency status. Once a person has been granted Stamp 4 status by the Irish Department of Justice, he or she is to report to their local Garda National Immigration Bureau in order to receive the physical card, or "Certificate of Registration". The card shows the holder's Stamp 4 status, as well as their photograph and other personal details.

Removal proceedings are administrative proceedings to determine an individual's removability under United States immigration law. Removal proceedings are typically conducted in Immigration Court by an immigration judge (IJ).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British nationality law</span> History and regulations of British citizenship

The primary law governing nationality in the United Kingdom is the British Nationality Act 1981, which came into force on 1 January 1983. Regulations apply to the British Islands, which include the UK itself and the Crown dependencies, and the 14 British Overseas Territories.

Multiple citizenship is a person's legal status in which a person is at the same time recognized by more than one country under its nationality and citizenship law as a national or citizen of that country. There is no international convention that determines the nationality or citizenship status of a person, which is consequently determined exclusively under national laws, that often conflict with each other, thus allowing for multiple citizenship situations to arise.

<i>Dimbo v Minister for Justice</i> Supreme Court of Ireland case

The case of Dimbo v Minister for Justice[2008] IESC 26; [2008] 27 ILT 231; [2008] 5 JIC 0101 was a Supreme Court that held that when deciding to make a deportation order in relation to the parents of an Irish born citizen under s.3 of the Immigration Act 1999, the state must consider facts that are specific to the individual child, his or her age, current educational progress, development and opportunities and his/her attachment to the community.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Sulaimon v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform [2012] IESC 63, 21 December 2012, retrieved 2020-01-11
  2. "Judges dismiss Minister's appeal in passport case". The Irish Times. Retrieved 2024-04-12.
  3. "Court says State action in passport case 'dispiriting'". The Irish Times. Retrieved 2024-04-12.
  4. Sulaimon -v- Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform.
  5. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2004/act/38/enacted/en/index.html
  6. "S.6A, Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 2004". Irish Statute Book.
  7. "S. 6B (4) Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 2004".
  8. "S.6, Irish Nationality and Immigration Act, 1956". Irish Statute Book.
  9. 1 2 "RESIDENCE PERMISSION POST SULAIMON". Brophy Solicitor. 2013-02-21. Retrieved 2020-01-12.
  10. pilaireland (2016-03-09). "PILA Bulletin | Public Interest Law Alliance". PILA. Retrieved 2024-04-12.