Syntactic hierarchy

Last updated

Syntax is concerned with the way sentences are constructed from smaller parts, such as words and phrases. Two steps can be distinguished in the study of syntax. The first step is to identify different types of units in the stream of speech and writing. In natural languages, such units include sentences, phrases, and words. The second step is to analyze how these units build up larger patterns, and in particular to find general rules that govern the construction of sentences.http://people.dsv.su.se/~vadim/cmnew/chapter2/ch2_21.htm

Contents

This can be broken down into constituents, which are a group of words that are organized as a unit, and the organization of those constituents. They are organized in a hierarchical structure, by embedding inside one another to form larger constituents. [1]

History

Universal Grammar: the Chomskyan view

In Chomsky’s view, humans are born with innate knowledge of certain principles that guide them in developing the grammar of their language. In other words, Chomsky’s theory is that language learning is facilitated by a predisposition that our brains have for certain structures of language. [2] This implies in turn that all languages have a common structural basis: the set of rules known as "universal grammar". [3] The theory of universal grammar entails that humans are born with an innate knowledge (or structural rules) of certain principles that guide them in developing the grammar of their language. [2]

Structural Linguistics: Saussurean Influences

Regarded as the "Founder of Structural Linguistics", which reflects the concept of structuralism, Ferdinand de Saussure stated the ways in which human culture requires an overarching structure to relate to in order to communicate. [4] He defines language to be different than human speech, which is fundamental and essential to language. While speech is a combination of several disciplines (i.e. physical, psychological, etc.) and is part of an individual and their society, language is a system of classification of its own entity. [5]

De Saussure argues that in written language, words are chained together in sequence on the chain of speaking, and therefore gain relations based on the linear nature of language. [5] Language, however, is not simply a classification for universal concepts, as translating from one language to another proves to be a difficult task. [6] Each Languages organizes their own world differently, and do not name existing categories, rather articulate their own. [6] This idea explains that though languages can differ within levels of Syntactic Hierarchy, all languages encompass the same set of levels.

The Levels of Syntactic Hierarchy

This diagram represents the order in which the levels of Syntactic Hierarchy appear. The Levels of Syntactic Hierarchy .jpg
This diagram represents the order in which the levels of Syntactic Hierarchy appear.

Groups of sentences (text) [7]

Separate sentences can combine together to create one sentence. [7] For example, the sentence “The boy chased the ball” and “He didn’t catch it” can be combined together. You can do this in many ways including stringing one sentence after the other or joining the sentences with conjunctions. [7]

1. “The boy chased the ball; he didn’t catch it.”

2. “The boy chased the ball, but he didn’t catch it.”

3. “The boy chased the ball, and he didn’t catch it.”

Sentence [7]

Phrases combined to form sentences. [7] The phrase “the girl” combines with the phrase “ran away” to form the sentence: “The girl ran away.”

Phrases [7]

Words combine to form phrases. [7] The word “the” combines with “girl” to form the phrase: “The girl” [7]

Words [7]

Morphemes combine to form words. [8] Morphemes belong to categories that determine how they combine. [8] For example, the word 'manageable' is made up of two morphemes 'manage' which is a verb and 'able' which is an adjective, these categories tell the morphemes how to combine so they form the word 'manageable.' [8]

Morphemes [7]

Smallest meaningful unit in a word. [8] For example, “boys” has two morphemes “boy” and “-s.”

Phonemes [7]

A unit of sound such as individual consonants and vowels of a language. [8] For example, /p/, /t/ and /æ/ are phonemes in English.

Phonetic form [7]

A subset of sounds which demonstrates the different variations of a phoneme. [8] Diacritics can be used to represent this, for example aspiration can be added to the letter /p/ in the word /pʰɪt/.

Unsegmented Speech [7]

Refers to ambiguous streams of words with spaces in between. For example, this can represent how an infant may hear human speech. [8]

Analysis of Syntactic Hierarchy Levels

Sentence

This illustration demonstrates how phrases combine to form a sentence. Sentence illustration .jpg
This illustration demonstrates how phrases combine to form a sentence.

Sentences are the hierarchal structure of combined phrases. When constructing a sentence, two types of phrases are always necessary: Noun Phrase (NP) and Verb Phrase (VP), forming the simplest possible sentence. [10] What determines whether a sentence is grammatically constructed (i.e. the sentence makes sense to a native speaker of the language), is its adherence to the language's phrase structure rules, allowing a language to generate large numbers of sentences. [10] Languages cross-linguistically differ in their phrase structure rules, resulting in the difference of order of the NP and VP, and other phrases included in a sentence. Languages which do have the similar phrase structure rules, however, will translate so that a sentence from one language will be grammatical when translated into the target language.

French example:

The French sentence directly translates to English, demonstrating that the phrase structures of both languages are very similar.

This diagram demonstrates how two phrases combine to form a sentence. In this case, it is both a noun phrase and a verb phrase TheGirlRanAwaySentence.jpg
This diagram demonstrates how two phrases combine to form a sentence. In this case, it is both a noun phrase and a verb phrase

Phrase

The idea that words combine to form phrases. For example, the word “the” combines with word “dog” to form the phrase “the dog”. [7] A phrase is a sequence of words or a group of words arranged in a grammatical way to combine and form a sentence. There are five commonly occurring types of phrases; Noun phrases (NP), Adjective phrases (AdjP), Verb phrases (VP), Adverb Phrases (AdvP), and Prepositional Phrases (PP).

Hierarchical combinations of words in their formation of phrasal categories are apparent cross-linguistically- for example, in French:

French examples:

Noun phrase

A noun phrase refers to a phrase that is built upon a noun. For example, “ The dog” or “the girl” in the sentence “the dog loved the girl” act as noun phrases.

Verb phrase

Verb phrase refers to a phrase that is composed of at least one main verb and one or more helping/auxiliary verb (every sentence needs at least one main verb). For example, the word “loved the girl” in the sentence “the dog loved the girl” acts as a verb phrase.

see also Adjective phrases (AdjP), Adverb phrases (AdvP), and Prepositional phrases (PP)

Phrase structure rules
A diagram which demonstrates how phrase structure rules take syntactic categories and create phrases TheDogLovedTheGirlSentence.jpg
A diagram which demonstrates how phrase structure rules take syntactic categories and create phrases

A phrase structure tree shows that a sentence is both linear string of words and a hierarchical structure with phrases nested in phrases (combination of phrase structures).

A phrase structure tree is a formal device for representing speaker’s knowledge about phrase structure in speech. [11]

The syntactic category of each individual word appears immediately above that word. In this way, “the” is shown to be a determiner, “child” is a noun, and so on.

Word

The subdomain that deals with words is morphology, which states that words are made up of morphemes which combine in a regular and rule-governed fashion. [8]

For example, the word 'national' is made up of two morphemes 'nation' which is a noun and '-al' which is a suffix that means pertaining to, this meaning helps us in categorizing '-al' as an adjective. These categories aid in arranging the morphemes so they can combine in a way that will form the word 'national,’ which is an adjective.

Morphology states that words come in categories, and the morphemes that join together to create the word assign the category. [8] The two main categories are open class, where new words can be created and closed class where there is a limited number of members. [8] Within both of these categories there are further sub-categories. Open class includes: nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs, and closed class includes: prepositions, determiners, numerals, complementizers, auxiliaries, modals, coordinators, and negation/affirmation. [8] These sub categories can be further broken down for example, verbs can be either transitive or intransitive. These categories can be identified with semantic criteria about what a word means, for instance nouns are said to be people, places, or things while verbs are actions. Words are all placed in these categories and depending on their category they follow specific rules that determine their word order. [8]

Cross-Linguistically other languages form words similarly to English. This is done by having morphemes of different categories combine in a rule governed fashion in order to create the word.

French example:

Minimalist Theory of Syntax

Syntactic hierarchy may be the most basic and assumed component of almost all syntactic theories, and yet the minimalist theory of syntax views a clause or group of words as a string, rather than as components of a hierarchical system. [12] While this theory prioritizes linearity over hierarchy, hierarchical structure is still analyzed if it "generates correct data" [12] or if there is "direct evidence for it". [12] In this way, it appears that syntactic hierarchy still plays an important role in even the minimalist theories.

Artificial language

In artificial languages, lexemes, tokens, and formulas are usually found among the basic units. [1]

See also

  • Level of detail (writing)
  • Semiotics
  • Syntax
  • Grammar
  • Further reading

    Related Research Articles

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Language</span> Structured system of communication

    Language is a structured system of communication that consists of grammar and vocabulary. It is the primary means by which humans convey meaning, both in spoken and written forms, and may also be conveyed through sign languages. Human language is characterized by its cultural and historical diversity, with significant variations observed between cultures and across time. Human languages possess the properties of productivity and displacement, which enable the creation of an infinite number of sentences, and the ability to refer to objects, events, and ideas that are not immediately present in the discourse. The use of human language relies on social convention and is acquired through learning.

    In linguistics, morphology is the study of words, including the principles by which they are formed, and how they relate to one another within a language. Most approaches to morphology investigate the structure of words in terms of morphemes, which are the smallest units in a language with some independent meaning. Morphemes include roots that can exist as words by themselves, but also categories such as affixes that can only appear as part of a larger word. For example, in English the root catch and the suffix -ing are both morphemes; catch may appear as its own word, or it may be combined with -ing to form the new word catching. Morphology also analyzes how words behave as parts of speech, and how they may be inflected to express grammatical categories including number, tense, and aspect. Concepts such as productivity are concerned with how speakers create words in specific contexts, which evolves over the history of a language.

    In linguistics, syntax is the study of how words and morphemes combine to form larger units such as phrases and sentences. Central concerns of syntax include word order, grammatical relations, hierarchical sentence structure (constituency), agreement, the nature of crosslinguistic variation, and the relationship between form and meaning (semantics). There are numerous approaches to syntax that differ in their central assumptions and goals.

    A syntactic category is a syntactic unit that theories of syntax assume. Word classes, largely corresponding to traditional parts of speech, are syntactic categories. In phrase structure grammars, the phrasal categories are also syntactic categories. Dependency grammars, however, do not acknowledge phrasal categories.

    In grammar, a phrase—called expression in some contexts—is a group of words or singular word acting as a grammatical unit. For instance, the English expression "the very happy squirrel" is a noun phrase which contains the adjective phrase "very happy". Phrases can consist of a single word or a complete sentence. In theoretical linguistics, phrases are often analyzed as units of syntactic structure such as a constituent. There is a difference between the common use of the term phrase and its technical use in linguistics. In common usage, a phrase is usually a group of words with some special idiomatic meaning or other significance, such as "all rights reserved", "economical with the truth", "kick the bucket", and the like. It may be a euphemism, a saying or proverb, a fixed expression, a figure of speech, etc.. In linguistics, these are known as phrasemes.

    Phrase structure rules are a type of rewrite rule used to describe a given language's syntax and are closely associated with the early stages of transformational grammar, proposed by Noam Chomsky in 1957. They are used to break down a natural language sentence into its constituent parts, also known as syntactic categories, including both lexical categories and phrasal categories. A grammar that uses phrase structure rules is a type of phrase structure grammar. Phrase structure rules as they are commonly employed operate according to the constituency relation, and a grammar that employs phrase structure rules is therefore a constituency grammar; as such, it stands in contrast to dependency grammars, which are based on the dependency relation.

    A noun phrase – or NP or nominal (phrase) – is a phrase that usually has a noun or pronoun as its head, and has the same grammatical functions as a noun. Noun phrases are very common cross-linguistically, and they may be the most frequently occurring phrase type.

    Lexical semantics, as a subfield of linguistic semantics, is the study of word meanings. It includes the study of how words structure their meaning, how they act in grammar and compositionality, and the relationships between the distinct senses and uses of a word.

    In linguistics, X-bar theory is a model of phrase-structure grammar and a theory of syntactic category formation that was first proposed by Noam Chomsky in 1970 reformulating the ideas of Zellig Harris (1951), and further developed by Ray Jackendoff, along the lines of the theory of generative grammar put forth in the 1950s by Chomsky. It attempts to capture the structure of phrasal categories with a single uniform structure called the X-bar schema, basing itself on the assumption that any phrase in natural language is an XP that is headed by a given syntactic category X. It played a significant role in resolving issues that phrase structure rules had, representative of which is the proliferation of grammatical rules, which is against the thesis of generative grammar.

    In linguistics, a determiner phrase (DP) is a type of phrase headed by a determiner such as many. Controversially, many approaches, take a phrase like not very many apples to be a DP, headed, in this case, by the determiner many. This is called the DP analysis or the DP hypothesis. Others reject this analysis in favor of the more traditional NP analysis where apples would be the head of the phrase in which the DP not very many is merely a dependent. Thus, there are competing analyses concerning heads and dependents in nominal groups. The DP analysis developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and it is the majority view in generative grammar today.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Generative grammar</span> Theory in linguistics

    Generative grammar is a theoretical approach in linguistics that regards grammar as a domain-specific system of rules that generates all and only the grammatical sentences of a given language. In light of poverty of the stimulus arguments, grammar is regarded as being partly innate, the innate portion of the system being referred to as universal grammar. The generative approach has focused on the study of syntax while addressing other aspects of language including semantics, morphology, phonology, and psycholinguistics.

    In linguistics, the head or nucleus of a phrase is the word that determines the syntactic category of that phrase. For example, the head of the noun phrase boiling hot water is the noun water. Analogously, the head of a compound is the stem that determines the semantic category of that compound. For example, the head of the compound noun handbag is bag, since a handbag is a bag, not a hand. The other elements of the phrase or compound modify the head, and are therefore the head's dependents. Headed phrases and compounds are called endocentric, whereas exocentric ("headless") phrases and compounds lack a clear head. Heads are crucial to establishing the direction of branching. Head-initial phrases are right-branching, head-final phrases are left-branching, and head-medial phrases combine left- and right-branching.

    In linguistics, branching refers to the shape of the parse trees that represent the structure of sentences. Assuming that the language is being written or transcribed from left to right, parse trees that grow down and to the right are right-branching, and parse trees that grow down and to the left are left-branching. The direction of branching reflects the position of heads in phrases, and in this regard, right-branching structures are head-initial, whereas left-branching structures are head-final. English has both right-branching (head-initial) and left-branching (head-final) structures, although it is more right-branching than left-branching. Some languages such as Japanese and Turkish are almost fully left-branching (head-final). Some languages are mostly right-branching (head-initial).

    In linguistics, especially within generative grammar, phi features are the morphological expression of a semantic process in which a word or morpheme varies with the form of another word or phrase in the same sentence. This variation can include person, number, gender, and case, as encoded in pronominal agreement with nouns and pronouns. Several other features are included in the set of phi-features, such as the categorical features ±N (nominal) and ±V (verbal), which can be used to describe lexical categories and case features.

    In linguistics, nominalization or nominalisation is the use of a word that is not a noun as a noun, or as the head of a noun phrase. This change in functional category can occur through morphological transformation, but it does not always. Nominalization can refer, for instance, to the process of producing a noun from another part of speech by adding a derivational affix, but it can also refer to the complex noun that is formed as a result.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Lucien Tesnière</span> French linguist (1893–1954)

    Lucien Tesnière was a prominent and influential French linguist. He was born in Mont-Saint-Aignan on May 13, 1893. As a senior lecturer at the University of Strasbourg (1924) and later professor at the University of Montpellier (1937), he published many papers and books on Slavic languages. However, his importance in the history of linguistics is based mainly on his development of an approach to the syntax of natural languages that would become known as dependency grammar. He presented his theory in his book Éléments de syntaxe structurale, published posthumously in 1959. In the book he proposes a sophisticated formalization of syntactic structures, supported by many examples from a diversity of languages. Tesnière died in Montpellier on December 6, 1954.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Biolinguistics</span> Study of the biology and evolution of language

    Biolinguistics can be defined as the study of biology and the evolution of language. It is highly interdisciplinary as it is related to various fields such as biology, linguistics, psychology, anthropology, mathematics, and neurolinguistics to explain the formation of language. It seeks to yield a framework by which we can understand the fundamentals of the faculty of language. This field was first introduced by Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, professor of Linguistics and Cognitive Science at the University of Arizona. It was first introduced in 1971, at an international meeting at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

    The term linguistic performance was used by Noam Chomsky in 1960 to describe "the actual use of language in concrete situations". It is used to describe both the production, sometimes called parole, as well as the comprehension of language. Performance is defined in opposition to "competence"; the latter describes the mental knowledge that a speaker or listener has of language.

    Merge is one of the basic operations in the Minimalist Program, a leading approach to generative syntax, when two syntactic objects are combined to form a new syntactic unit. Merge also has the property of recursion in that it may be applied to its own output: the objects combined by Merge are either lexical items or sets that were themselves formed by Merge. This recursive property of Merge has been claimed to be a fundamental characteristic that distinguishes language from other cognitive faculties. As Noam Chomsky (1999) puts it, Merge is "an indispensable operation of a recursive system ... which takes two syntactic objects A and B and forms the new object G={A,B}" (p. 2).

    The lexicalist hypothesis is a hypothesis proposed by Noam Chomsky in which he claims that syntactic transformations only can operate on syntactic constituents. It says that the system of grammar that assembles words is separate and different from the system of grammar that assembles phrases out of words.

    References

    1. 1 2 Carnie, Andrew (2013) Syntax: A Generative Introduction. 3rd edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    2. 1 2 "Tool Module: Chomsky's Universal Grammar". thebrain.mcgill.ca. Retrieved 2017-12-13.
    3. "Tool Module: Chomsky's Universal Grammar". thebrain.mcgill.ca. Retrieved 2017-12-06.
    4. Blackburn, Simon (2008). The Oxford dictionary of philosophy (2nd ed., rev ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780199541430. OCLC   191929574.
    5. 1 2 de Saussure, Ferdinand (1915). Bally, Charles; Sechehaye, Albert (eds.). Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Baskin, Wade. McGraw-Hill Book Company. pp. 15, 123.
    6. 1 2 Culler, Johnathon (1986). Ferdinand de Saussure . Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. pp.  33.
    7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Burton, Strang; Dechaine, Rose-Marie; Vatikiotis-Bateson, Eric (2012). Linguistics for dummies. Ontario: Juha Wiley & Sona Canada, Ltd.
    8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sportiche, Dominique; Koopman, Hilda; Stabler, Edward (2014). An Introduction to Syntactic Analysis and Theory. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 9–11. ISBN   978-1-4051-0016-8.
    9. Yule, George (2015). The Study of Language. United Kingdom: Cambridge University: Cambridge. p. 87. ISBN   9781107658172.
    10. 1 2 Yule, George (2015). The Study of Language. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. p. 87. ISBN   9781107658172.
    11. Borsley, Robert. D (1996). Modern phrase structure grammar. Blackwell. ISBN   0631184066.
    12. 1 2 3 Dowty, David (January 27, 1989). "Toward a Minimalist Theory of Syntactic Structure". Tilburg Conference on Discontinuous Constituency: 10–62. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.453.7014 .