TNT equivalent

Last updated
Ton of TNT
Atomic blast Nevada Yucca 1951.jpg
The explosion from a 14 kiloton nuclear test at the Nevada Test Site, in 1951.
General information
Unit system Non-standard
Unit ofenergy
Symboltorton of TNT
Conversions
1 t in ...... is equal to ...
    SI base units    4.184 Gigajoules
    CGS    109 calories
    US customary    3.968×106 BTU
   Non-SI metric   1.162×103 kWh

TNT equivalent is a convention for expressing energy, typically used to describe the energy released in an explosion. The ton of TNT is a unit of energy defined by that convention to be 4.184  gigajoules , [1] which is the approximate energy released in the detonation of a metric ton (1,000 kilograms) of TNT. In other words, for each gram of TNT exploded, 4184 joules (or one large Calorie = 1,000 calories) of energy is released.

Contents

This convention intends to compare the destructiveness of an event with that of traditional explosive materials, of which TNT is a typical example, although other conventional explosives such as dynamite contain more energy.

Kiloton and megaton

The "kiloton (of TNT)" is a unit of energy equal to 4.184 terajoules (4.184×1012 J).

The "megaton (of TNT)" is a unit of energy equal to 4.184 petajoules (4.184×1015 J).

The kiloton and megaton of TNT have traditionally been used to describe the energy output, and hence the destructive power, of a nuclear weapon. The TNT equivalent appears in various nuclear weapon control treaties, and has been used to characterize the energy released in such other highly destructive events as an asteroid impact. [2]

Historical derivation of the value

Alternative values for TNT equivalency can be calculated according to which property is being compared and when in the two detonation processes the values are measured. [3] [4] [5] [6]

Where for example the comparison is by energy yield, an explosive's energy is normally expressed for chemical purposes as the thermodynamic work produced by its detonation. For TNT this has been accurately measured as 4686 J/g from a large sample of air blast experiments, and theoretically calculated to be 4853 J/g. [7]

But, even on this basis, comparing the actual energy yields of a large nuclear device and an explosion of TNT can be slightly inaccurate. Small TNT explosions, especially in the open, don't tend to burn the carbon-particle and hydrocarbon products of the explosion. Gas-expansion and pressure-change effects tend to "freeze" the burn rapidly. A large open explosion of TNT may maintain fireball temperatures high enough so that some of those products do burn up with atmospheric oxygen. [8]

Such differences can be substantial. For safety purposes a range as wide as 2673–6702 J has been stated for a gram of TNT upon explosion. [9]

So, one can state that a nuclear bomb has a yield of 15 kt (6.3×1013 J); but an actual explosion of a 15000 ton pile of TNT may yield (for example) 8×1013 J due to additional carbon/hydrocarbon oxidation not present with small open-air charges. [8]

These complications have been sidestepped by convention. The energy liberated by one gram of TNT was arbitrarily defined as a matter of convention to be 4184 J, [10] which is exactly one kilocalorie.

A kiloton of TNT can be visualized as a cube of TNT 8.46 metres (27.8 ft) on a side.

Grams TNTSymbolTons TNTSymbolEnergy [Joules]Energy [Wh]Corresponding mass loss
gram of TNTgmicroton of TNTμt4.184×103 J or 4.184 kilojoules1.162 Wh46.55 pg
kilogram of TNTkgmilliton of TNTmt4.184×106 J or 4.184 megajoules1.162 kWh46.55 ng
megagram of TNTMgton of TNTt4.184×109 J or 4.184 gigajoules1.162 MWh46.55 μg
gigagram of TNTGgkiloton of TNTkt4.184×1012 J or 4.184 terajoules1.162 GWh46.55 mg
teragram of TNTTgmegaton of TNTMt4.184×1015 J or 4.184 petajoules1.162 TWh46.55 g
petagram of TNTPggigaton of TNTGt4.184×1018 J or 4.184 exajoules1.162 PWh46.55 kg

Conversion to other units

1 ton TNT equivalent is approximately:

Examples

Megatons of TNTEnergy [Wh]Description
1×10−121.162 Wh≈ 1 food Calorie (large Calorie, kcal), which is the approximate amount of energy needed to raise the temperature of one kilogram of water by one degree Celsius at a pressure of one atmosphere.
1×10−91.162 kWhUnder controlled conditions one kilogram of TNT can destroy (or even obliterate) a small vehicle.
1×10−811.62 kWhThe approximate radiant heat energy released during 3-phase, 600 V, 100 kA arcing fault in a 0.5 m × 0.5 m × 0.5 m (20 in × 20 in × 20 in) compartment within a 1-second period. [11] [ further explanation needed ]
1.2×10−813.94 kWhAmount of TNT used (12 kg) in Coptic church explosion in Cairo, Egypt on December 11, 2016 that left 25 dead [12]
(1–44)×10−61.16–51.14 MWhConventional bombs yield from less than one ton to FOAB's 44 tons. The yield of a Tomahawk cruise missile is equivalent to 500 kg of TNT, or approximately 0.5 tons. [13]
1.9×10−62.90 MWhThe television show MythBusters used 2.5 tons of ANFO to make "homemade" diamonds.
5×10−4581 MWhA real 0.5-kilotonne-of-TNT (2.1 TJ) charge at Operation Sailor Hat. If the charge were a full sphere, it would be 1 kilotonne of TNT (4.2 TJ).
500 tons of TNT (5 by 10 m (17 by 34 ft)) awaiting detonation at Operation Sailor Hat. Sailor Hat Shot.jpg
500 tons of TNT (5 by 10 m (17 by 34 ft)) awaiting detonation at Operation Sailor Hat.
(1–2)×10−31.16–2.32 GWhEstimated yield of the Oppau explosion that killed more than 500 at a German fertilizer factory in 1921.
2.3×10−32.67 GWhAmount of solar energy falling on 4,000 m2 (1 acre) of land in a year is 9.5 TJ (2,650 MWh) (an average over the Earth's surface).
3×10−33.49 GWhThe Halifax Explosion in 1917 was the accidental detonation of 200 tons of TNT and 2,300 tons of Picric acid
4×10−39.3 GWh Minor Scale, a 1985 United States conventional explosion, using 4,744 tons of ANFO explosive to provide a scaled equivalent airblast of an eight kiloton (33.44 TJ) nuclear device, [14] is believed to be the largest planned detonation of conventional explosives in history.
(1.5–2)×10−217.4–23.2 GWhThe Little Boy atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, exploded with an energy of about 15 kilotons of TNT (63 TJ), and the Fat Man atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945, exploded with an energy of about 20 kilotons of TNT (84 TJ). The modern nuclear weapons in the United States arsenal range in yield from 0.3 kt (1.3 TJ) to 1.2 Mt (5.0 PJ) equivalent, for the B83 strategic bomb.
11.16 TWhThe energy contained in one megaton of TNT (4.2 PJ) is enough to power the average American household for 103,000 years. [15] The 30 Mt (130 PJ) estimated upper limit blast power of the Tunguska event could power the same average home for more than 3,100,000 years. The energy of that blast could power the entire United States for 3.27 days. [16]
33.5 TWhThe total energy of all explosives used in World War II, including the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atom bombs, is estimated to have been three megatons of TNT.
8.610 TWhThe energy released by a typical tropical cyclone in one minute, primarily from water condensation. Winds constitute 0.25% of that energy. [17]
21.525 TWhThe complete conversion of 1 kg of matter into pure energy would yield the theoretical maximum (E = mc2) of 89.8 petajoules, which is equivalent to 21.5 megatons of TNT. No such method of total conversion as combining 500 grams of matter with 500 grams of antimatter has yet been achieved. In the event of proton–antiproton annihilation, approximately 50% of the released energy will escape in the form of neutrinos, which are almost undetectable. [18] Electron–positron annihilation events emit their energy entirely as gamma rays.
2428 TWhApproximate total yield of the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens.
25–10029–116 TWhDuring the Cold War, the United States developed hydrogen bombs with maximum theoretical yields of 25 megatons of TNT (100 PJ). The Soviet Union developed a prototype weapon, nicknamed the Tsar Bomba, which was tested at 50 Mt (210 PJ), but had a maximum theoretical yield of 100 Mt (420 PJ). [19] The effective destructive potential of such a weapon varies greatly, depending on such conditions as the altitude at which it is detonated, the characteristics of the target, the terrain, and the physical landscape upon which it is detonated.
26.330.6 TWh Megathrust earthquakes 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake released record ME surface rupture energy, or potential for damage at 26.3 megatons of TNT (110 PJ).
200232 TWhThe total energy released by the eruption of Mt. Krakatoa in Indonesia in 1883.
540628 TWhThe total energy produced worldwide by all nuclear testing and combat combined, from the 1940s until the present is about 540 megatons.[ citation needed ]
1,4601.69 PWhThe total global nuclear arsenal is about 15,000 nuclear warheads [20] [21] [22] with a destructive capacity of around 1460 megatons [23] [24] [25] [26] or 1.460 gigatons (1,460 million tons) of TNT.
104,400121 PWhThe total solar irradience energy received by Earth in the upper atmosphere per hour.
875,0001,000 PWhApproximate yield of the last eruption of the Yellowstone supervolcano.
6×1066,973 PWhThe estimated energy at impact when the largest fragment of Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 struck Jupiter is equivalent to 6 million megatons (6 trillion tons) of TNT.
9.32×10610,831 PWhThe energy released in the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami was over 200,000 times the surface energy and was calculated by the USGS at 3.9×1022 joules, [27] slightly less than the 2004 Indian Ocean quake. This is equivalent to 9,320 gigatons of TNT, or approximately 600 million times the energy of the Hiroshima bomb.
9.56×10611,110 PWh Megathrust earthquakes record huge MW values, or total energy released. The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake released 9,560 gigatons TNT equivalent.
1×108116,222 PWhThe approximate energy released when the Chicxulub impact caused the mass extinction 65–66 million years ago was estimated to be equal to 100 teratons (i.e. 100 exagrams or approximately 220.462 quadrillion pounds) of TNT (a teraton equals 1 million megatons). That is roughly 8 billion times stronger than each of the bombs that hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the most energetic event on the history of Earth for hundreds of millions of years, far more powerful than any volcanic eruption, earthquake or firestorm. Such an explosion annihilated everything within a thousand miles of the impact in a split second. Such energy is equivalent to that needed to power the whole Earth for several centuries.
3×108 - 119×108349 EWh to 14 ZWhLater estimates for the Chicxulub impactor energy have climbed to between 300 million megatons and 11,900 million megatons. [28]
5.972×10156.94×1027 WhThe explosive energy of a quantity of TNT the mass of Earth.
7.89×10159.17×1027 WhTotal solar output in all directions per day.
1.98×10212.3×1033 WhThe explosive energy of a quantity of TNT the mass of the Sun.
(2.4–4.8)×1028(2.8–5.6)×1040 WhA type 1a supernova explosion gives off 1–2×1044 joules of energy, which is about 2.4–4.8 hundred billion yottatons (24–48 octillion (2.4–4.8×1028) megatons) of TNT, equivalent to the explosive force of a quantity of TNT over a trillion (1012) times the mass of the planet Earth. This is the astrophysical standard candle used to determine galactic distances.
(2.4–4.8)×1030(2.8–5.6)×1042 WhThe largest type of supernova observed, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) release more than 1046 joules of energy. [29]
1.3×10321.5×1044 WhA merger of two black holes, resulting in the first observation of gravitational waves, released 5.3×1047 joules

Relative effectiveness factor

The relative effectiveness factor (RE factor) relates an explosive's demolition power to that of TNT, in units of the TNT equivalent/kg (TNTe/kg). The RE factor is the relative mass of TNT to which an explosive is equivalent: The greater the RE, the more powerful the explosive.

This enables engineers to determine the proper masses of different explosives when applying blasting formulas developed specifically for TNT. For example, if a timber-cutting formula calls for a charge of 1 kg of TNT, then based on octanitrocubane's RE factor of 2.38, it would take only 1.0/2.38 (or 0.42) kg of it to do the same job. Using PETN, engineers would need 1.0/1.66 (or 0.60) kg to obtain the same effects as 1 kg of TNT. With ANFO or ammonium nitrate, they would require 1.0/0.74 (or 1.35) kg or 1.0/0.42 (or 2.38) kg, respectively.

Calculating a single RE factor for an explosive is, however, impossible. It depends on the specific case or use. Given a pair of explosives, one can produce 2× the shockwave output (this depends on the distance of measuring instruments) but the difference in direct metal cutting ability may be 4× higher for one type of metal and 7× higher for another type of metal. The relative differences between two explosives with shaped charges will be even greater. The table below should be taken as an example and not as a precise source of data.


Some Relative Effectiveness factor examples[ citation needed ]
Explosive, gradeDensity
(g/ml)
Detonation
vel. (m/s)
Relative
Effectiveness
Ammonium nitrate (AN + <0.5% H2O)0.882700 [30] 0.42
Mercury(II) fulminate 4.4242500.51 [31]
Black powder (75%  KNO3 + 19%  C + 6%  S, ancient explosives)1.656000.55 [32]
Tanerit Simply (93% granulated  AN + 6%  red P + 1%  C)0.9027500.55
Hexamine dinitrate (HDN)1.3050700.60
Dinitrobenzene (DNB)1.5060250.60
HMTD (hexamine peroxide)0.8845200.74
ANFO (94%  AN + 6% fuel oil)0.9252700.74
TATP (acetone peroxide)1.1853000.80
Tovex Extra (AN water gel) commercial product1.3356900.80
Hydromite 600 (AN water emulsion) commercial product1.2455500.80
ANNMAL (66%  AN + 25%  NM + 5%  Al + 3%  C + 1% TETA)1.1653600.87
Amatol (50%  TNT + 50%  AN)1.5062900.91
Nitroguanidine 1.3267500.95
Trinitrotoluene (TNT)1.6069001.00
Hexanitrostilbene (HNS)1.7070801.05
Nitrourea 1.4568601.05
Tritonal (80%  TNT + 20%  aluminium)*1.7066501.05
Nickel hydrazine nitrate (NHN)1.7070001.05
Amatol (80%  TNT + 20%  AN)1.5565701.10
Nitrocellulose (13.5% N, NC; AKA guncotton)1.4064001.10
Nitromethane (NM)1.1363601.10
PBXW-126 (22% NTO, 20% RDX, 20% AP, 26% Al, 12% PU's system)*1.8064501.10
Diethylene glycol dinitrate (DEGDN)1.3866101.17
PBXIH-135 EB (42% HMX, 33% Al, 25% PCP-TMETN's system)*1.8170601.17
PBXN-109 (64% RDX, 20% Al, 16% HTPB's system)*1.6874501.17
Triaminotrinitrobenzene (TATB)1.8075501.17
Picric acid (TNP)1.7173501.17
Trinitrobenzene (TNB)1.6073001.20
Tetrytol (70%  tetryl + 30%  TNT)1.6073701.20
Dynamite, Nobel's (75% NG + 23% diatomite)1.4872001.25
Tetryl 1.7177701.25
Torpex (aka HBX, 41%  RDX + 40%  TNT + 18% Al + 1% wax)*1.8074401.30
Composition B (63%  RDX + 36%  TNT + 1%  wax)1.7278401.33
Composition C-3 (78%  RDX)1.6076301.33
Composition C-4 (91%  RDX)1.5980401.37
Pentolite (56% PETN + 44%  TNT)1.6675201.33
Semtex 1A (76%  PETN + 6%  RDX)1.5576701.35
Hexal (76% RDX + 20% Al + 4% wax)*1.7976401.35
RISAL P (50%  IPN + 28%  RDX + 15%  Al + 4%  Mg + 1%  Zr + 2%  NC)*1.3959801.40
Hydrazine mononitrate1.5985001.42
Mixture: 24% nitrobenzene + 76% TNM 1.4880601.50
Mixture: 30% nitrobenzene + 70% nitrogen tetroxide 1.3982901.50
Nitroglycerin (NG)1.5977001.54
Methyl nitrate (MN)1.2179001.54
Octol (80% HMX + 19% TNT + 1% DNT)1.8386901.54
Nitrotriazolon (NTO)1.8781201.60
DADNE (1,1-diamino-2,2-dinitroethene, FOX-7)1.7783301.60
Gelignite (92% NG + 7% nitrocellulose)1.6079701.60
Plastics Gel® (in toothpaste tube: 45% PETN + 45% NG + 5% DEGDN + 4% NC)1.5179401.60
Composition A-5 (98% RDX + 2% stearic acid)1.6584701.60
Erythritol tetranitrate (ETN)1.7282061.60
Hexogen (RDX)1.7887001.60
PBXW-11 (96% HMX, 1% HyTemp, 3% DOA)1.8187201.60
Penthrite (PETN)1.7784001.66
Ethylene glycol dinitrate (EGDN)1.4983001.66
Trinitroazetidine (TNAZ)1.8586401.70
Octogen (HMX grade B)1.8691001.70
Hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (HNIW; AKA CL-20)1.9793801.80
Hexanitrobenzene (HNB)1.9794001.85
MEDINA (Methylene dinitroamine)1.6587001.93
DDF (4,4’-Dinitro-3,3’-diazenofuroxan)1.98100001.95
Heptanitrocubane (HNC)1.929200N/A
Octanitrocubane (ONC)1.95106002.38

*: TBX (thermobaric explosives) or EBX (enhanced blast explosives), in a small, confined space, may have over twice the power of destruction. The total power of aluminized mixtures strictly depends on the condition of explosions.

Nuclear examples

Nuclear weapons and the most powerful non-nuclear weapon examples
Weapon Total yield
(kilotons of TNT)
Weight
(kg)
Relative
Effectiveness
Bomb used in Oklahoma City (ANFO based on racing fuel)0.00182,3000.78
GBU-57 bomb (Massive Ordnance Penetrator, MOP)0.003513,6000.26
Grand Slam (Earthquake bomb, M110)0.00659,9000.66
BLU-82 (Daisy Cutter)0.00756,8001.10
MOAB (non-nuclear bomb, GBU-43)0.0119,8001.13
FOAB (advanced thermobaric bomb, ATBIP)0.0449,1004.83
Davy Crockett (nuclear device), set to lower yield0.022231,000
Davy Crockett (nuclear device), set to higher yield1.02343,500
Hypothetical suitcase nuke 2.53180,000
Fat Man (dropped on Nagasaki) A-bomb 2046004,500
Classic (one-stage) fission A-bomb 2242050,000
W88 modern thermonuclear warhead (MIRV)4703551,300,000
Typical (two-stage) nuclear bomb 500–1000650–1120900,000
W56 thermonuclear warhead1,200272–3084,960,000
B53 nuclear bomb (two-stage)9,00040502,200,000
B41 nuclear bomb (three-stage)25,00048505,100,000
Tsar nuclear bomb (three-stage)50,000–56,00026,5002,100,000

See also

Related Research Articles

Tonne Metric unit of mass equivalent to 1,000 kilograms

The tonne is a non-SI metric unit of mass equal to 1,000 kilograms. It is commonly referred to as a metric ton in the United States. It is equivalent to approximately 2,204.6 pounds, 1.102 short tons (US) or approximately 0.984 long tons (UK). The official SI unit is the megagram, a less common way to express the same mass.

Tsar Bomba Most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated

The Soviet RDS-202 hydrogen bomb, known to the Western nations as Tsar Bomba, was the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created. Tested on 30 October 1961 as an experimental verification of calculation principles and multi-stage thermonuclear weapon designs, it also remains the most powerful human-made explosive ever detonated.

Nuclear weapon design Process by which nuclear WMDs are designed and produced

Nuclear weapon designs are physical, chemical, and engineering arrangements that cause the physics package of a nuclear weapon to detonate. There are three existing basic design types:

Operation Ivy series of American nuclear tests

Operation Ivy was the eighth series of American nuclear tests, coming after Tumbler-Snapper and before Upshot–Knothole. The two explosions were staged in late 1952 at Eniwetok Atoll in the Pacific Proving Ground in the Marshall Islands.

Effects of nuclear explosions Type and severity of damage caused by nuclear weapons

The effects of a nuclear explosion on its immediate vicinity are typically much more destructive and multifaceted than those caused by conventional explosives. In most cases, the energy released from a nuclear weapon detonated within the lower atmosphere can be approximately divided into four basic categories:

Project Plowshare term for United States plan to use nuclear explosives for peaceful construction purposes

Project Plowshare was the overall United States program for the development of techniques to use nuclear explosives for peaceful construction purposes. As part of the program, 31 nuclear warheads were detonated in 27 separate tests. Plowshare was the US portion of what are called Peaceful Nuclear Explosions (PNE); a similar Soviet program was carried out under the name Nuclear Explosions for the National Economy.

Operation Whetstone

The United States's Whetstone nuclear test series was a group of 46 nuclear tests conducted in 1964-1965. These tests followed the Operation Niblick series and preceded the Operation Flintlock series.

Operation Crosstie

Operation Crosstie was a series of 48 nuclear tests conducted by the United States in 1967–1968 at the Nevada Test Site. These tests followed the Operation Latchkey series and preceded the Operation Bowline series.

Project Orion (nuclear propulsion) Nuclear explosion-powered spacecraft

Project Orion was a study of a spacecraft intended to be directly propelled by a series of explosions of atomic bombs behind the craft. Early versions of this vehicle were proposed to take off from the ground ; later versions were presented for use only in space. Six non-nuclear tests were conducted using models. The project was eventually abandoned for multiple reasons such as the Partial Test Ban Treaty which banned nuclear explosions in space as well as concerns over nuclear fallout.

Antimatter weapon Theoretical weapon using antimatter

An antimatter weapon is a theoretically possible device using antimatter as a power source, a propellant, or an explosive for a weapon. Antimatter weapons cannot yet be produced due to the current cost of production of antimatter given the extremely limited technology available to create it in sufficient masses to be viable in a weapon, and the fact that it annihilates upon touching ordinary matter, making containment very difficult.

B83 nuclear bomb Type of Unguided bomb

The B83 thermonuclear weapon is a variable-yield unguided bomb developed by the United States in the late 1970s, entering service in 1983. With a maximum yield of 1.2 megatons, it is the most powerful nuclear free-fall weapon currently in the United States arsenal. It was designed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and the first underground test detonation of the production B83 took place on 15 December 1984 in Nevada at Area U19ac.

There have been many extremely large explosions, accidental and intentional, caused by modern high explosives, boiling liquid expanding vapour explosions (BLEVEs), older explosives such as gunpowder, volatile petroleum-based fuels such as petrol, and other chemical reactions. This list contains the largest known examples, sorted by date. An unambiguous ranking in order of severity is not possible; a 1994 study by historian Jay White of 130 large explosions suggested that they need to be ranked by an overall effect of power, quantity, radius, loss of life and property destruction, but concluded that such rankings are difficult to assess. The weight of an explosive does not directly correlate with the energy or destructive impact of an explosion, as these can depend upon many other factors such as containment, proximity, purity, preheating, and external oxygenation.

Nuclear weapon yield Energy released in nuclear weapons explosions

The explosive yield of a nuclear weapon is the amount of energy released when that particular nuclear weapon is detonated, usually expressed as a TNT equivalent (the standardized equivalent mass of trinitrotoluene which, if detonated, would produce the same energy discharge), either in kilotons (kt—thousands of tons of TNT), in megatons (Mt—millions of tons of TNT), or sometimes in terajoules (TJ). An explosive yield of one terajoule is equal to 0.239 kilotonnes of TNT. Because the accuracy of any measurement of the energy released by TNT has always been problematic, the conventional definition is that one kiloton of TNT is held simply to be equivalent to 1012 calories.

Minor Scale Test conducted on June 27, 1985 by the United States Defense Nuclear Agency

Minor Scale was a test conducted on June 27, 1985, by the United States Defense Nuclear Agency involving the detonation of several thousand tons of conventional explosives to simulate the explosion of a small nuclear bomb. The purpose of the test was to evaluate the effect of nuclear blasts on various pieces of military hardware, particularly new, blast-hardened launchers for the Midgetman ballistic missile.

The United States's Touchstone nuclear test series was a group of 13 nuclear tests conducted in 1987-1988. These tests followed the Operation Musketeer series and preceded the Operation Cornerstone series.

The United States's Sculpin nuclear test series was a group of 7 nuclear tests conducted in 1990-1991. These tests followed the Operation Aqueduct series and preceded the Operation Julin series.

The United States's Bedrock nuclear test series was a group of 27 nuclear tests conducted in 1974-1975. These tests followed the Operation Arbor series and preceded the Operation Anvil series.

Operation Project 56 was a series of 4 nuclear tests conducted by the United States in 1955-1956 at the Nevada Test Site. These tests followed the Operation Wigwam series and preceded the Operation Redwing series.

Project 57 was an open-air nuclear test conducted by the United States at the Nellis Air Force Range in 1957, following Operation Redwing, and preceding Operation Plumbbob. The test area, also known as Area 13, was a 10 miles (16 km) by 16 miles (26 km) block of land abutting the northeast boundary of the Nevada National Security Site.

References

  1. "Tons (Explosives) to Gigajoules Conversion Calculator". unitconversion.org.
  2. "Joules to Megatons Conversion Calculator". unitconversion.org.
  3. Sorin Bastea, Laurence E. Fried, Kurt R. Glaesemann, W. Michael Howard, P. Clark Souers, Peter A. Vitello, Cheetah 5.0 User's Manual, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2007.
  4. Maienschein, Jon L. (2002). Estimating equivalency of explosives through a thermochemical approach (PDF) (Technical report). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. UCRL-JC-147683. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 21, 2016.
  5. Maienschein, Jon L. (2002). Tnt equivalency of different explosives – estimation for calculating load limits in heaf firing tanks (Technical report). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. EMPE-02-22.
  6. Cunningham, Bruce J. (2001). C-4/tnt equivalency (Technical report). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. EMPE-01-81.
  7. Cooper, Paul W. (1996). Explosives Engineering. New York: Wiley-VCH. p. 406. ISBN   978-0-471-18636-6.
  8. 1 2 Charles E. Needham (October 3, 2017). Blast Waves. p. 91. ISBN   978-3319653822. OCLC   1005353847. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved January 25, 2019.
  9. Blast effects of external explosions (Section 4.8. Limitations of the TNT equivalent method) Archived August 10, 2016, at the Wayback Machine
  10. "Appendix B8 – Factors for Units Listed Alphabetically". 2009-07-02. In NIST SI Guide 2008
  11. "Arc blast Tri-Nitro-Toluene TNT Trotyl equivalent – ARCAD INC". arcblasts.com.
  12. Atassi, Basma; Sirgany, Sarah; Narayan, Chandrika (December 13, 2016). "Local media: Blast at Cairo cathedral kills at least 25". CNN . Retrieved 5 April 2017.
  13. Homer-Dixon, Thomas F; Homer-Dixon, Thomas (2002). The Ingenuity Gap. p. 249. ISBN   978-0-375-71328-6.
  14. TECH REPS INC ALBUQUERQUE NM (1986). "Minor Scale Event, Test Execution Report". hdl:100.2/ADA269600.Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  15. "Frequently Asked Questions – Electricity". United States Department of Energy. 2009-10-06. Retrieved 2009-10-21. (Calculated from 2007 value of 936 kWh monthly usage)
  16. "Country Comparison :: Electricity – consumption". The World Factbook. CIA. Archived from the original on 2012-01-28. Retrieved 2009-10-22. (Calculated from 2007 value of 3,892,000,000,000 kWh annual usage)
  17. "NOAA FAQ: How much energy does a hurricane release?". National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration. August 2001. Retrieved 2009-06-30. cites 6E14 watts continuous.
  18. Borowski, Stanley K. (March 1996). Comparison of Fusion/Antiproton Propulsion systems (PDF). 23rd Joint Propulsion Conference. NASA Glenn Research Center. doi:10.2514/6.1987-1814. hdl:2060/19960020441.[ permanent dead link ]
  19. See Currently deployed U.S. nuclear weapon yields Archived September 7, 2016, at the Wayback Machine , Complete List of All U.S. Nuclear Weapons Archived December 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine , Tsar Bomba Archived June 17, 2016, at the Wayback Machine , all from Carey Sublette's Nuclear Weapon Archive.
  20. "Status of World Nuclear Forces". fas.org.
  21. "Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance". armscontrol.org.
  22. "Global nuclear weapons: downsizing but modernizing". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 13 June 2016.
  23. Kristensen, Hans M.; Norris, Robert S. (May 3, 2016). "Russian nuclear forces, 2016". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 72 (3): 125–134. Bibcode:2016BuAtS..72c.125K. doi: 10.1080/00963402.2016.1170359 via Taylor and Francis+NEJM.
  24. Kristensen, Hans M; Norris, Robert S (2015). "US nuclear forces, 2015". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 71 (2): 107. Bibcode:2015BuAtS..71b.107K. doi:10.1177/0096340215571913.
  25. "Minimize Harm and Security Risks of Nuclear Energy". Archived from the original on 2014-09-24. Retrieved 2017-05-04.
  26. Kristensen, Hans M; Norris, Robert S (2015). "Chinese nuclear forces, 2015". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 71 (4): 77. Bibcode:2015BuAtS..71d..77K. doi:10.1177/0096340215591247.
  27. "USGS.gov: USGS WPhase Moment Solution". Earthquake.usgs.gov. Archived from the original on 14 March 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2011.
  28. Durand-Manterola, H. J.; Cordero-Tercero, G. (2014). "Assessments of the energy, mass and size of the Chicxulub Impactor". arXiv: 1403.6391 [astro-ph.EP].
  29. Maselli, A.; Melandri, A.; Nava, L.; Mundell, C. G.; Kawai, N.; Campana, S.; Covino, S.; Cummings, J. R.; Cusumano, G.; Evans, P. A.; Ghirlanda, G.; Ghisellini, G.; Guidorzi, C.; Kobayashi, S.; Kuin, P.; LaParola, V.; Mangano, V.; Oates, S.; Sakamoto, T.; Serino, M.; Virgili, F.; Zhang, B.- B.; Barthelmy, S.; Beardmore, A.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bersier, D.; Burrows, D.; Calderone, G.; Capalbi, M.; Chiang, J. (2014). "GRB 130427A: A Nearby Ordinary Monster". Science. 343 (6166): 48–51. arXiv: 1311.5254 . Bibcode:2014Sci...343...48M. doi:10.1126/science.1242279. PMID   24263134.
  30. US Army FM 3–34.214: Explosives and Demolition, 2007, page 1–2.
  31. Whitehall Paraindistries
  32. "FM 5–250" (PDF). bits.de. United States Department of the Army. Retrieved 23 October 2019.