Thomas Young (scientist)

Last updated

Thomas Young

Thomas Young by Briggs cropped.jpg
Portrait by Henry Perronet Briggs, 1822
Born(1773-06-13)13 June 1773
Died10 May 1829(1829-05-10) (aged 55)
London, England
Alma mater University of Edinburgh Medical School
University of Göttingen
Emmanuel College, Cambridge
Known for Wave theory of light
Double-slit experiment
Young–Dupré equation
Young–Helmholtz theory
Young–Laplace equation
Young temperament
Young's Modulus
Young's rule
Scientific career
Fields Physics
Young Thomas signature.jpg

Thomas Young FRS (13 June 1773 10 May 1829) was a British polymath who made notable contributions to the fields of vision, light, solid mechanics, energy, physiology, language, musical harmony, and Egyptology. He was instrumental in the decipherment of Egyptian hieroglyphs, specifically the Rosetta Stone.


Young has been described as "The Last Man Who Knew Everything". [1] His work influenced that of William Herschel, Hermann von Helmholtz, James Clerk Maxwell, and Albert Einstein. Young is credited with establishing Christiaan Huygens' wave theory of light, in contrast to the corpuscular theory of Isaac Newton. [2] Young's work was subsequently supported by the work of Augustin-Jean Fresnel. [3]

Personal life

Young belonged to a Quaker family of Milverton, Somerset, where he was born in 1773, the eldest of ten children. [4] [5] By the age of fourteen, Young had learned Greek, Latin, French, Italian, Syriac, Samaritan Hebrew, Arabic, Biblical Aramaic, Persian, Turkish, and Ge'ez. [5] [6]

Young began to study medicine in London at St Bartholomew's Hospital in 1792, moved to the University of Edinburgh Medical School in 1794, and a year later went to Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany, where he obtained the degree of doctor of medicine in 1796 from the University of Göttingen. [7] In 1797 he entered Emmanuel College, Cambridge. [8] In the same year he inherited the estate of his grand-uncle, Richard Brocklesby, which made him financially independent, and in 1799 he established himself as a physician at 48 Welbeck Street, London [5] (now recorded with a blue plaque). Young published many of his first academic articles anonymously to protect his reputation as a physician. [9]

In 1801, Young was appointed professor of natural philosophy (mainly physics) at the Royal Institution. [10] In two years, he delivered 91 lectures. In 1802, he was appointed foreign secretary of the Royal Society, [11] of which he had been elected a fellow in 1794. [12] He resigned his professorship in 1803, fearing that its duties would interfere with his medical practice. His lectures were published in 1807 in the Course of Lectures on Natural Philosophy and contain a number of anticipations of later theories. [5] [13]

In 1811, Young became physician to St George's Hospital, and in 1814 he served on a committee appointed to consider the dangers involved in the general introduction of gas for lighting into London. [14] In 1816 he was secretary of a commission charged with ascertaining the precise length of the seconds pendulum (the length of a pendulum whose period is exactly 2 seconds), and in 1818 he became secretary to the Board of Longitude and superintendent of the HM Nautical Almanac Office. [5] [15]

Young was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1822. [16] A few years before his death he became interested in life insurance, [17] and in 1827 he was chosen as one of the eight foreign associates of the French Academy of Sciences. [5] In the same year he became a first class corresponding member, living abroad, of the Royal Institute of the Netherlands. [18] In 1828, he was elected a foreign member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. [19]

In 1804, Young married Eliza Maxwell. They had no children. [20]

Young died in his 56th year in London on 10 May 1829, having suffered recurrent attacks of "asthma". His autopsy revealed atherosclerosis of the aorta. [21] His body was buried in the graveyard of St. Giles Church at Farnborough, in the county of Kent. Westminster Abbey houses a white marble tablet in memory of Young, [22] bearing an epitaph by Hudson Gurney: [23] [24]

Sacred to the memory of Thomas Young, M.D., Fellow and Foreign Secretary of the Royal Society Member of the National Institute of France; a man alike eminent in almost every department of human learning. Patient of unintermitted labour, endowed with the faculty of intuitive perception, who, bringing an equal mastery to the most abstruse investigations of letters and of science, first established the undulatory theory of light, and first penetrated the obscurity which had veiled for ages the hieroglyphs of Egypt. Endeared to his friends by his domestic virtues, honoured by the World for his unrivalled acquirements, he died in the hopes of the Resurrection of the just. —Born at Milverton, in Somersetshire, 13 June 1773. Died in Park Square, London, 10 May 1829, in the 56th year of his age.

Young was highly regarded by his friends and colleagues. He was said never to impose his knowledge, but if asked was able to answer even the most difficult scientific question with ease. Although very learned he had a reputation for sometimes having difficulty in communicating his knowledge. It was said by one of his contemporaries that, "His words were not those in familiar use, and the arrangement of his ideas seldom the same as those he conversed with. He was therefore worse calculated than any man I ever knew for the communication of knowledge." [25]

Religious views

Though he sometimes dealt with religious topics of history in Egypt and wrote about the history of Christianity in Nubia, not much is known about Young's personal religious views. [26] On George Peacock's account, Young never spoke to him about morals, metaphysics or religion, though according to Young's wife, his attitudes showed that "his Quaker upbringing had strongly influenced his religious practices." [27] Authoritative sources have described Young in terms of a cultural Christian Quaker. [28] [29]

Hudson Gurney informed that before his marriage, Young had to join the Church of England, and was baptized later. [30] Gurney stated that Young "retained a good deal of his old creed, and carried to his scriptural studies his habit of inquisition of languages and manners," rather than the habit of proselytism. [31] Yet, the day before his death, Young participated in religious sacraments; as reported in David Brewster's Edinburgh Journal of Science: "After some information concerning his affairs, and some instructions concerning the hierographical papers in his hands, he said that, perfectly aware of his situation, he had taken the sacraments of the church on the day preceding. His religious sentiments were by himself stated to be liberal, though orthodox. He had extensively studied the Scriptures, of which the precepts were deeply impressed upon his mind from his earliest years; and he evidenced the faith which he professed; in an unbending course of usefulness and rectitude." [32]


Wave theory of light

In Young's own judgment, of his many achievements the most important was to establish the wave theory of light set out by Christiaan Huygens in his Treatise on Light (1690). [33] [34] To do so, he had to overcome the century-old view, expressed in the venerable Newton's Opticks , that light is a particle. Nevertheless, in the early 19th century Young put forth a number of theoretical reasons supporting the wave theory of light, and he developed two enduring demonstrations to support this viewpoint. With the ripple tank he demonstrated the idea of interference in the context of water waves. With Young's interference experiment, the predecessor of the double-slit experiment, he demonstrated interference in the context of light as a wave.

Plate from "Lectures" of 1802 (RI), pub. 1807 Young-Thomas-Lectures1807-Plate XXX.jpg
Plate from "Lectures" of 1802 (RI), pub. 1807

Young, speaking on 24 November 1803, to the Royal Society of London, began his now-classic description of the historic experiment: [35]

The experiments I am about to relate ... may be repeated with great ease, whenever the sun shines, and without any other apparatus than is at hand to every one. [36]

In his subsequent paper, titled Experiments and Calculations Relative to Physical Optics (1804), Young describes an experiment in which he placed a card measuring approximately 0.85 millimetres (0.033 in) in a beam of light from a single opening in a window and observed the fringes of colour in the shadow and to the sides of the card. He observed that placing another card in front or behind the narrow strip so as to prevent the light beam from striking one of its edges caused the fringes to disappear. [37] This supported the contention that light is composed of waves. [38]

Young performed and analysed a number of experiments, including interference of light from reflection off nearby pairs of micrometre grooves, from reflection off thin films of soap and oil, and from Newton's rings. He also performed two important diffraction experiments using fibres and long narrow strips. In his Course of Lectures on Natural Philosophy and the Mechanical Arts (1807) he gives Grimaldi credit for first observing the fringes in the shadow of an object placed in a beam of light. Within ten years, much of Young's work was reproduced and then extended by Augustin-Jean Fresnel.

Young's modulus

Young's Mathematical Elements of Natural Philosophy Young - Mathematical elements of natural philosophy, 2002 - 3933182 F.tif
Young's Mathematical Elements of Natural Philosophy

Young described the characterization of elasticity that came to be known as Young's modulus, denoted as E, in 1807, and further described it in his Course of Lectures on Natural Philosophy and the Mechanical Arts. [39] However, the first use of the concept of Young's modulus in experiments was by Giordano Riccati in 1782—predating Young by 25 years. [40] Furthermore, the idea can be traced to a paper by Leonhard Euler published in 1727, some 80 years before Thomas Young's 1807 paper.

The Young's modulus relates the stress (pressure) in a body to its associated strain (change in length as a ratio of the original length); that is, stress = E × strain, for a uniaxially loaded specimen. Young's modulus is independent of the component under investigation; that is, it is an inherent material property (the term modulus refers to an inherent material property). Young's Modulus allowed, for the first time, prediction of the strain in a component subject to a known stress (and vice versa). Prior to Young's contribution, engineers were required to apply Hooke's F = kx relationship to identify the deformation (x) of a body subject to a known load (F), where the constant (k) is a function of both the geometry and material under consideration. Finding k required physical testing for any new component, as the F = kx relationship is a function of both geometry and material. Young's Modulus depends only on the material, not its geometry, thus allowing a revolution in engineering strategies.

Young's problems in sometimes not expressing himself clearly were shown by his own definition of the modulus: "The modulus of the elasticity of any substance is a column of the same substance, capable of producing a pressure on its base which is to the weight causing a certain degree of compression as the length of the substance is to the diminution of its length." When this explanation was put to the Lords of the Admiralty, their clerk wrote to Young saying "Though science is much respected by their Lordships and your paper is much esteemed, it is too learned ... in short it is not understood." [41]

Vision and colour theory

Young has also been called the founder of physiological optics. In 1793 he explained the mode in which the eye accommodates itself to vision at different distances as depending on change of the curvature of the crystalline lens; in 1801 he was the first to describe astigmatism; [42] and in his lectures he presented the hypothesis, afterwards developed by Hermann von Helmholtz, (the Young–Helmholtz theory), that colour perception depends on the presence in the retina of three kinds of nerve fibres. [5] [43] This foreshadowed the modern understanding of colour vision, in particular the finding that the eye does indeed have three colour receptors which are sensitive to different wavelength ranges.

Young–Laplace equation

In 1804, Young developed the theory of capillary phenomena on the principle of surface tension. [44] He also observed the constancy of the angle of contact of a liquid surface with a solid, and showed how from these two principles to deduce the phenomena of capillary action. In 1805, Pierre-Simon Laplace, the French philosopher, discovered the significance of meniscus radii with respect to capillary action.

In 1830, Carl Friedrich Gauss, the German mathematician, unified the work of these two scientists to derive the Young–Laplace equation, the formula that describes the capillary pressure difference sustained across the interface between two static fluids.

Young was the first to define the term "energy" in the modern sense. [45] He also did work on the theory of tides paralleling that of Laplace and anticipating more well-known work by Airy.

Young's equation and Young–Dupré equation

Young's equation describes the contact angle of a liquid drop on a plane solid surface as a function of the surface free energy, the interfacial free energy and the surface tension of the liquid. Young's equation was developed further some 60 years later by Dupré to account for thermodynamic effects, and this is known as the Young–Dupré equation.


In physiology Young made an important contribution to haemodynamics in the Croonian lecture for 1808 on the "Functions of the Heart and Arteries," where he derived a formula for the wave speed of the pulse [46] and his medical writings included An Introduction to Medical Literature, including a System of Practical Nosology (1813) and A Practical and Historical Treatise on Consumptive Diseases (1815). [5]

Young devised a rule of thumb for determining a child's drug dosage. Young's Rule states that the child dosage is equal to the adult dosage multiplied by the child's age in years, divided by the sum of 12 plus the child's age.


In an appendix to his 1796 Göttingen dissertation De corporis hvmani viribvs conservatricibvs there are four pages added proposing a universal phonetic alphabet (so as 'not to leave these pages blank'; lit.: "Ne vacuae starent hae paginae, libuit e praelectione ante disputationem habenda tabellam literarum vniuersalem raptim describere"). It includes 16 "pure" vowel symbols, nasal vowels, various consonants, and examples of these, drawn primarily from French and English.

In his Encyclopædia Britannica article "Languages", Young compared the grammar and vocabulary of 400 languages. [1] In a separate work in 1813, he introduced the term Indo-European languages, 165 years after the Dutch linguist and scholar Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn proposed the grouping to which this term refers in 1647.

Egyptian hieroglyphs

Young made significant contributions to the decipherment of ancient Egyptian writing systems. He started his Egyptology work rather late, in 1813, when the work was already in progress among other researchers.

He began by using an Egyptian demotic alphabet of 29 letters built up by Johan David Åkerblad in 1802 (14 turned out to be incorrect). Åkerblad was correct in stressing the importance of the demotic text in trying to read the inscriptions, but he wrongly believed that demotic was entirely alphabetic. [47]

By 1814 Young had completely translated the "enchorial" text of the Rosetta Stone [5] (using a list with 86 demotic words), and then studied the hieroglyphic alphabet but initially failed to recognise that the demotic and hieroglyphic texts were paraphrases and not simple translations. [48]

There was considerable rivalry between Young and Jean-François Champollion while both were working on hieroglyphic decipherment. At first they briefly cooperated in their work, but later, from around 1815, a chill arose between them. For many years they kept details of their work away from each other.

Some of Young's conclusions appeared in the famous article "Egypt" he wrote for the 1818 edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica. [5]

When Champollion finally published a translation of the hieroglyphs and the key to the grammatical system in 1822, Young (and many others) praised his work. Nevertheless, a year later Young published an Account of the Recent Discoveries in Hieroglyphic Literature and Egyptian Antiquities, [5] with the aim of having his own work recognised as the basis for Champollion's system.

Young had correctly found the sound value of six hieroglyphic signs, but had not deduced the grammar of the language. Young himself acknowledged that he was somewhat at a disadvantage because Champollion's knowledge of the relevant languages, such as Coptic, was much greater. [49]

Several scholars have suggested that Young's true contribution to Egyptology was his decipherment of the demotic script. He made the first major advances in this area; he also correctly identified demotic as being composed by both ideographic and phonetic signs. [50]

Subsequently, Young felt that Champollion was unwilling to share the credit for the decipherment. In the ensuing controversy, strongly motivated by the political tensions of that time, the British tended to champion Young, while the French mostly championed Champollion. Champollion did acknowledge some of Young's contribution, but rather sparingly. However, after 1826, when Champollion was a curator in the Louvre, he did offer Young access to demotic manuscripts. [51]

In England, while Sir George Lewis still doubted Champollion's achievement as late as 1862, others were more accepting. For example, Reginald Poole, and Sir Peter Le Page Renouf both defended Champollion. [52]


Young developed Young temperament, a method of tuning musical instruments.


Later scholars and scientists have praised Young's work although they may know him only through achievements he made in their fields. His contemporary Sir John Herschel called him a "truly original genius". [53] Albert Einstein praised him in the 1931 foreword to an edition of Isaac Newton's Opticks . Other admirers include physicist Lord Rayleigh and Nobel Physics laureate Philip Anderson.

Thomas Young's name has been adopted as the name of the London-based Thomas Young Centre, an alliance of academic research groups engaged in the theory and simulation of materials.

Young Sound in eastern Greenland was named in his honour by William Scoresby (1789–1857). [54]

Selected writings

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rosetta Stone</span> Ancient Egyptian stele with inscriptions in three writing systems

The Rosetta Stone is a stele of granodiorite inscribed with three versions of a decree issued in 196 BC during the Ptolemaic dynasty of Egypt, on behalf of King Ptolemy V Epiphanes. The top and middle texts are in Ancient Egyptian using hieroglyphic and Demotic scripts, respectively, while the bottom is in Ancient Greek. The decree has only minor differences across the three versions, making the Rosetta Stone key to deciphering the Egyptian scripts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Egyptian hieroglyphs</span> Formal writing system used by ancient Egyptians

Egyptian hieroglyphs were the formal writing system used in Ancient Egypt for writing the Egyptian language. Hieroglyphs combined logographic, syllabic and alphabetic elements, with more than 100 distinct characters. Cursive hieroglyphs were used for religious literature on papyrus and wood. The later hieratic and demotic Egyptian scripts were derived from hieroglyphic writing, as was the Proto-Sinaitic script that later evolved into the Phoenician alphabet. Through the Phoenician alphabet's major child systems, the Egyptian hieroglyphic script is ancestral to the majority of scripts in modern use, most prominently the Latin and Cyrillic scripts and the Arabic script, and possibly the Brahmic family of scripts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jean-François Champollion</span> French classical scholar, decipherer of Egyptian hieroglyphs (1790–1832)

Jean-François Champollion, also known as Champollion le jeune, was a French philologist and orientalist, known primarily as the decipherer of Egyptian hieroglyphs and a founding figure in the field of Egyptology. Partially raised by his brother, the scholar Jacques Joseph Champollion-Figeac, Champollion was a child prodigy in philology, giving his first public paper on the decipherment of Demotic in his late teens. As a young man he was renowned in scientific circles, and read Coptic, Ancient Greek, Latin, Hebrew and Arabic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antoine Isaac Silvestre de Sacy</span> French linguist and orientalist (1758–1838)

Antoine Isaac, Baron Silvestre de Sacy, was a French nobleman, linguist and orientalist. His son, Ustazade Silvestre de Sacy, became a journalist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heinrich Karl Brugsch</span> German Egyptologist (1827–1894)

Heinrich Karl Brugsch was a German Egyptologist. He was associated with Auguste Mariette in his excavations at Memphis. He became director of the School of Egyptology at Cairo, producing numerous very valuable works and pioneering the decipherment of Demotic, the simplified script of the later Egyptian periods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacques-Joseph Champollion-Figeac</span> French archaeologist (1778–1867)

Jacques-Joseph Champollion-Figeac, also known as Champollion l'aîné was a French archaeologist, elder brother of Jean-François Champollion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">W. Andrew Robinson</span> British author and newspaper editor

William Andrew Coulthard Robinson is a British author and former newspaper editor.

In optics, the corpuscular theory of light states that light is made up of small discrete particles called "corpuscles" which travel in a straight line with a finite velocity and possess impetus. This was based on an alternate description of atomism of the time period.

<i>Egypt</i> (TV series) 2005 British television docudrama series

Egypt is a BBC television docudrama serial portraying events in the history of Egyptology from the 18th through early 20th centuries. It originally aired on Sunday nights at 9 pm on BBC1 in 2005. The first two episodes explored the work of Howard Carter and his archaeological quest in Egypt in the early part of the twentieth century. The next two episodes focused on the eccentric explorer "The Great Belzoni" played here by Matthew Kelly. The final two episodes dramatise the discovery and deciphering of the Rosetta Stone by Jean-François Champollion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Johan David Åkerblad</span> Swedish diplomat and orientalist

Johan David Åkerblad was a Swedish diplomat and orientalist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decipherment of ancient Egyptian scripts</span>

The writing systems used in ancient Egypt were deciphered in the early nineteenth century through the work of several European scholars, especially Jean-François Champollion and Thomas Young. Ancient Egyptian forms of writing, which included the hieroglyphic, hieratic and demotic scripts, ceased to be understood in the fourth and fifth centuries AD, as the Coptic alphabet was increasingly used in their place. Later generations' knowledge of the older scripts was based on the work of Greek and Roman authors whose understanding was faulty. It was thus widely believed that Egyptian scripts were exclusively ideographic, representing ideas rather than sounds, and even that hieroglyphs were an esoteric, mystical script rather than a means of recording a spoken language. Some attempts at decipherment by Islamic and European scholars in the Middle Ages and early modern times acknowledged the script might have a phonetic component, but perception of hieroglyphs as purely ideographic hampered efforts to understand them as late as the eighteenth century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jed Buchwald</span> American historian

Jed Zachary Buchwald is Doris and Henry Dreyfuss Professor of History at Caltech. He was previously director of the Dibner Institute for the History of Science and Technology at MIT. He won a MacArthur Fellowship in 1995 and was elected to the American Philosophical Society in 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philae obelisk</span> Obelisk found at Philae, Egypt

The Philae obelisk is one of a pair of twin obelisks erected at Philae in Upper Egypt in the second century BC. It was discovered by William John Bankes in 1815, who had it brought to Kingston Lacy in Dorset, England, where it still stands today. The Greek and Egyptian hieroglyphic inscriptions on the obelisk played a role in the decipherment of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs.

The decade of the 1790s in archaeology involved some significant events.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karl Richard Lepsius</span> German Egyptologist and linguist (1810–1884)

Karl Richard Lepsius was a pioneering Prussian Egyptologist, linguist and modern archaeologist.

Antoine Galland was a publisher and printer during the French Revolution and First Empire. As a printer, he joined the Commission des Sciences et des Arts, a body of technical experts (savants) sent to Egypt in 1798 to aid the work of the French expeditionary force in its successful invasion. He was therefore in Cairo when the newly discovered Rosetta Stone arrived in the city. With two other experts he was called on to make lithographic copies from the stone. These copies, the first seen in Europe, were used by Silvestre de Sacy and Johan David Åkerblad in their early attempts to decipher the hieroglyphic and demotic scripts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jean-Joseph Marcel</span>

Jean-Joseph Marcel was a French printer and engineer. He was also a savant who accompanied Napoleon's 1798 campaign in Egypt as a member of the Commission des Sciences et des Arts, a corps of 167 technical experts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lettre à M. Dacier</span>

Lettre à M. Dacier is a letter sent in 1822 by the Egyptologist Jean-François Champollion to Bon-Joseph Dacier, secretary of the French Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres. It is the founding text upon which Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs were first systematically deciphered by Champollion, largely on the basis of the multilingual Rosetta Stone.

Young's interference experiment, also called Young's double-slit interferometer, was the original version of the modern double-slit experiment, performed at the beginning of the nineteenth century by Thomas Young. This experiment played a major role in the general acceptance of the wave theory of light. In Young's own judgement, this was the most important of his many achievements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caylus vase</span> Egyptian alabaster jar

The Caylus vase is an Egyptian alabaster jar dedicated in the name of the Achaemenid king Xerxes I in Egyptian hieroglyphs and Old Persian cuneiform, which in 1823 played an important role in the modern decipherment of cuneiform and the decipherment of ancient Egyptian scripts.


  1. 1 2 Robinson, Andrew (2007). The Last Man Who Knew Everything: Thomas Young, the Anonymous Genius who Proved Newton Wrong and Deciphered the Rosetta Stone, among Other Surprising Feats. Penguin. ISBN   978-0-13-134304-7.
  2. Kipnis, Naum S. (1991). History of the Principle of Interference of Light. Springer. p. 65. ISBN   9780817623166.
  3. Nolte, David D. (2023). Interference: The History of Optical Interferometry and the Scientists Who Tamed Light (Oxford University Press, 2023). Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0192869760.pp. 45-84
  4. "Thomas Young". School of Mathematics and Statistics University of St Andrews, Scotland. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Wikisource-logo.svg One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain :  Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Young, Thomas". Encyclopædia Britannica . Vol. 28 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 940.
  6. Singh, Simon (October 1999). The Code Book: The Evolution of Secrecy from Mary, Queen of Scots to Quantum Cryptography (1st ed.). New York: Doubleday. pp. 207–208. ISBN   978-0-385-49532-5.
  7. "Thomas Young (1773–1829)". Andrew Gasson. 5 May 2016. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  8. "Young, Thomas (YN797T)". A Cambridge Alumni Database. University of Cambridge.
  9. Robinson, Andrew (2006). The Last Man Who Knew Everything: Thomas Young, the Anonymous Polymath Who Proved Newton Wrong, Explained How We See, Cured the Sick and Deciphered the Rosetta Stone. Oneworld Publications. p. 4. ISBN   978-1851684946.
  10. "Ri Professors". Royal Institution. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  11. "THOMAS YOUNG (1773–1829)". Emmanuel College. Archived from the original on 31 August 2017. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  12. "Portrait of Thomas Young". Royal Society. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  13. Morgan, Michael (2002). "Thomas Young's Lectures on Natural Philosophy and the Mechanical Arts". Perception. 31 (12): 1509–1511. doi: 10.1068/p3112rvw .
  14. Weld, Charles Richard (2011). A History of the Royal Society: With Memoirs of the Presidents. Cambridge University Press. pp. 235–237. ISBN   9781108028189.
  15. Wood, Alexander; Oldham, Frank (1954). Thomas Young: Natural Philosopher, 1773-1829. CUP Archive. pp. 304–308.
  16. "Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter Y" (PDF). American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved 8 September 2016.
  17. Peacock, George (1855). Life of Thomas Young: M.D., F.R.S., &c.; and One of the Eight Foreign Associates of the National Institute of France. J. Murray. p.  403.
  18. "Thomas Young (1773 - 1829)". Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Archived from the original on 22 August 2020.
  19. Cooper, David K.C. (2013). Doctors of Another Calling: Physicians Who Are Known Best in Fields Other than Medicine. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 98–101. ISBN   9781611494679.
  20. O'Connor, J. J.; Robertson, E. F. (2006). "Thomas Young". School of Mathematics and Statistics University of St Andrews, Scotland.
  21. Bruce Fye, W.; Willis Hurst, J. (1997), "Thomas Young", Clinical Cardiology, 20 (1): 87–88, doi:10.1002/clc.4960200119, PMC   6656136 , PMID   8994746
  22. 'The Abbey Scientists' Hall, A.R. p58: London; Roger & Robert Nicholson; 1966
  23. Samuel Austin Allibone (1871). A Critical Dictionary of English Literature: And British and American Authors, Living and Deceased, from the Earliest Accounts to the Middle of the Nineteenth Century. Containing Thirty Thousand Biographies and Literary Notices, with Forty Indexes of Subjects, Volume 3. J. B. Lippincott & Co. p. 2904.
  24. Wood, Alexander; Oldham, Frank (1954). Thomas Young Natural Philosopher 1773–1829. Cambridge University Press. p. 331.
  25. "Peacock's Life of Dr Young" by George Peacock, D.D., F.R.S., etc. Dean of Ely, Lowndean Professor of Astronomy University of Cambridge, etc. quoted in "The Living Age" by E. Littell, Second Series, Volume X, 1855, Littell, Son and Company, Boston.
  26. Wood, Alexander. 2011. Thomas Young: Natural Philosopher 1773–1829. Cambridge University Press. p. 56
  27. Wood, Alexander. 2011. Thomas Young: Natural Philosopher 1773–1829 . Cambridge University Press. p. 329
  28. Peacock & Leitch., Miscellaneous works of the late Thomas Young (1855), London, J. Murray, p. 516: "he was pre-eminently entitled to the high distinction of a Christian, patriot, and philosopher."
  29. Wood, Alexander. 2011. Thomas Young: Natural Philosopher 1773–1829. Cambridge University Press. p. XVI
  30. Wood, Alexander. 2011. Thomas Young: Natural Philosopher 1773–1829 . Cambridge University Press. p. 56
  31. Wood, Alexander. 2011, p. 56
  32. Brewster, David. 1831. The Edinburgh Journal of Science . Vol. 8, Blackwood. pp. 204;207
  33. "Thomas Young (1773–1829)". UC Santa Barbara. Retrieved 5 September 2016.
  34. Haidar, Riad. "Thomas Young and the wave theory of light" (PDF). Bibnum. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 September 2016. Retrieved 5 September 2016.
  35. Shamos, Morris (1959). Great Experiments in Physics. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. pp. 96–101.
  36. Young, Thomas (1804). "Bakerian Lecture: Experiments and calculations relative to physical optics". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 94: 1–2. Bibcode:1804RSPT...94....1Y. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1804.0001 . S2CID   110408369.
  37. Magie, William Francis (1935). A Source Book in Physics. Harvard University Press. p. 309
  38. Both Young and Newton were eventually shown to be partially correct, as neither wave nor particle explanations alone can explain the behaviour of light. See e.g.
  39. Young, Thomas (1845). Course of Lectures on Natural Philosophy and the Mechanical Arts. London: Taylor and Walton. p.  106. modulus thomas young.
  40. Truesdell, Clifford A. (1960). The Rational Mechanics of Flexible or Elastic Bodies, 1638–1788: Introduction to Leonhardi Euleri Opera Omnia, vol. X and XI, Seriei Secundae. Orell Fussli.
  41. "Structures, or Why Things Don't Fall Down" by J. E. Gordon, Penguin Books, 1978.
  42. Young, Thomas (1801). "On the mechanics of the eye". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 91: 23–88. Bibcode:1801RSPT...91...23Y. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1801.0004 .
  43. Young, T. (1802). "Bakerian Lecture: On the Theory of Light and Colours". Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 92: 12–48. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1802.0004 .
  44. Young, Thomas (1805). "An Essay on the Cohesion of Fluids". Phil. Trans. 95: 65–87. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1805.0005 . JSTOR   107159. S2CID   116124581.
  45. Weber, Wilhelm (1878). "Elektrodynamische Massbestimmungen insbesondere über die Energie der Wechselwirkung". Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physischen Classe der königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. S. Hirzel. p.  650.
  46. Tijsseling, A.S., Anderson, A. (2008). Thomas Young's research on fluid transients: 200 years on. BHR Group. ISBN   978-1-85598-095-2.{{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  47. E.A.W. Budge, [1893], The Rosetta Stone. p132
  48. Young's first publications are as follows: "Letter to the Rev. S. Weston respecting some Egyptian Antiquities". With four copper plates [published under the name of his friend William Rouse Boughton, but written by Young], Archeologia Britannica. London, 1814. Vol. XVIII. P. 59-72; [Anonymous publication], Museum Criticum of Cambridge, Pt. VI., 1815 (this includes the correspondence which took place between Young, Silvestre de Sacy and Akerblad)
  49. Singh, Simon. "The Decipherment of Hieroglyphs". BBC. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
  50. Adkins & Adkins 2000, p. 277.
  51. "Jean-François Champollion". Great Historians. Archived from the original on 20 April 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
  52. Thomasson 2013.
  53. Buick, Tony (2010). The Rainbow Sky: An Exploration of Colors in the Solar System and Beyond. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 81. ISBN   9781441910530.
  54. Place names, NE Greenland

Works cited

Further reading