Three-center four-electron bond

Last updated

The 3-center 4-electron (3c–4e) bond is a model used to explain bonding in certain hypervalent molecules such as tetratomic and hexatomic interhalogen compounds, sulfur tetrafluoride, the xenon fluorides, and the bifluoride ion. [1] [2] It is also known as the Pimentel–Rundle three-center model after the work published by George C. Pimentel in 1951, [3] which built on concepts developed earlier by Robert E. Rundle for electron-deficient bonding. [4] [5] An extended version of this model is used to describe the whole class of hypervalent molecules such as phosphorus pentafluoride and sulfur hexafluoride as well as multi-center π-bonding such as ozone and sulfur trioxide.

Contents

There are also molecules such as diborane (B2H6) and dialane (Al2H6) which have three-center two-electron bond (3c-2e) bonds.

History

While the term "hypervalent" was not introduced in the chemical literature until 1969, [6] Irving Langmuir and G. N. Lewis debated the nature of bonding in hypervalent molecules as early as 1921. [7] [8] While Lewis supported the viewpoint of expanded octet, invoking s-p-d hybridized orbitals and maintaining 2c–2e bonds between neighboring atoms, Langmuir instead opted for maintaining the octet rule, invoking an ionic basis for bonding in hypervalent compounds (see Hypervalent molecule, valence bond theory diagrams for PF5 and SF6). [9]

In a 1951 seminal paper, [3] Pimentel rationalized the bonding in hypervalent trihalide ions (X
3
, X = F, Br, Cl, I) via a molecular orbital (MO) description, building on the concept of the "half-bond" introduced by Rundle in 1947. [4] [5] In this model, two of the four electrons occupy an all in-phase bonding MO, while the other two occupy a non-bonding MO, leading to an overall bond order of 0.5 between adjacent atoms (see Molecular orbital description).

More recent theoretical studies on hypervalent molecules support the Langmuir view, confirming that the octet rule serves as a good first approximation to describing bonding in the s- and p-block elements. [10] [11]

Examples of molecules exhibiting three-center four-electron bonding

σ 3c–4e

π 3c–4e

Structure and bonding

Molecular orbital description

Figure 1: Diagram illustrating s molecular orbitals of the triiodide anion. Triiodide molecular orbitals.png
Figure 1: Diagram illustrating σ molecular orbitals of the triiodide anion.

The σ molecular orbitals (MOs) of triiodide can be constructed by considering the in-phase and out-of-phase combinations of the central atom's p orbital (collinear with the bond axis) with the p orbitals of the peripheral atoms. [12] This exercise generates the diagram at right (Figure 1). Three molecular orbitals result from the combination of the three relevant atomic orbitals, with the four electrons occupying the two MOs lowest in energy – a bonding MO delocalized across all three centers, and a non-bonding MO localized on the peripheral centers. Using this model, one sidesteps the need to invoke hypervalent bonding considerations at the central atom, since the bonding orbital effectively consists of two 2-center-1-electron bonds (which together do not violate the octet rule), and the other two electrons occupy the non-bonding orbital.

Valence bond (natural bond orbital) description

Figure 2: A donor-acceptor interaction diagram illustrating construction of the triiodide anion s natural bond orbitals from I2 and I fragments. I3-NBOs.png
Figure 2: A donor-acceptor interaction diagram illustrating construction of the triiodide anion σ natural bond orbitals from I2 and I fragments.

In the natural bond orbital viewpoint of 3c–4e bonding, the triiodide anion is constructed from the combination of the diiodine (I2) σ molecular orbitals and an iodide (I) lone pair. The I lone pair acts as a 2-electron donor, while the I2 σ* antibonding orbital acts as a 2-electron acceptor. [12] Combining the donor and acceptor in in-phase and out-of-phase combinations results in the diagram depicted at right (Figure 2). Combining the donor lone pair with the acceptor σ* antibonding orbital results in an overall lowering in energy of the highest-occupied orbital (ψ2). While the diagram depicted in Figure 2 shows the right-hand atom as the donor, an equivalent diagram can be constructed using the left-hand atom as the donor. This bonding scheme is succinctly summarized by the following two resonance structures: I—I···I ↔ I···I—I (where "—" represents a single bond and "···" represents a "dummy bond" with formal bond order 0 whose purpose is only to indicate connectivity), which when averaged reproduces the I—I bond order of 0.5 obtained both from natural bond orbital analysis and from molecular orbital theory.

Figure 3: Diagram depicting the natural bond orbital donor-acceptor interaction in neon difluoride. The central Ne atom acts as the donor, while the out-of-phase combination of the peripheral F atoms acts as the acceptor. The two orbitals have been overlaid on the same molecule framework. NeF2-DA.tif
Figure 3: Diagram depicting the natural bond orbital donor-acceptor interaction in neon difluoride. The central Ne atom acts as the donor, while the out-of-phase combination of the peripheral F atoms acts as the acceptor. The two orbitals have been overlaid on the same molecule framework.

More recent theoretical investigations suggest the existence of a novel type of donor-acceptor interaction that may dominate in triatomic species with so-called "inverted electronegativity" [13] ; that is, a situation in which the central atom is more electronegative than the peripheral atoms. Molecules of theoretical curiosity such as neon difluoride (NeF2) and berylium dilithide (BeLi2) represent examples of inverted electronegativity. [13] As a result of unusual bonding situation, the donor lone pair ends up with significant electron density on the central atom, while the acceptor is the "out-of-phase" combination of the p orbitals on the peripheral atoms. This bonding scheme is depicted in Figure 3 for the theoretical noble gas dihalide NeF2.

SN2 transition state modeling

The valence bond description and accompanying resonance structures A—B···C ↔ A···B—C suggest that molecules exhibiting 3c–4e bonding can serve as models for studying the transition states of bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

Covalent bond Chemical bond that involves the sharing of electron pairs between atoms

A covalent bond, also called a molecular bond, is a chemical bond that involves the sharing of electron pairs between atoms. These electron pairs are known as shared pairs or bonding pairs, and the stable balance of attractive and repulsive forces between atoms, when they share electrons, is known as covalent bonding. For many molecules, the sharing of electrons allows each atom to attain the equivalent of a full outer shell, corresponding to a stable electronic configuration. In organic chemistry, covalent bonds are much more common than ionic bonds.

Conjugated system System of connected p orbitals with delocalized electrons increasing molecular stability.

In chemistry, a conjugated system is a system of connected p orbitals with delocalized electrons in a molecule, which in general lowers the overall energy of the molecule and increases stability. It is conventionally represented as having alternating single and multiple bonds. Lone pairs, radicals or carbenium ions may be part of the system, which may be cyclic, acyclic, linear or mixed. The term "conjugated" was coined in 1899 by the German chemist Johannes Thiele.

Octet rule Chemical rule of thumblets

The octet rule is a chemical rule of thumb that reflects the observation that main group elements tend to bond in such a way that each atom has eight electrons in its valence shell, giving it the same electronic configuration as a noble gas. The rule is especially applicable to carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and the halogens, but also to metals such as sodium or magnesium.

In chemistry, resonance is a way of describing bonding in certain molecules or ions by the combination of several contributing structures into a resonance hybrid in valence bond theory. It has particular value for describing delocalized electrons within certain molecules or polyatomic ions where the bonding cannot be expressed by one single Lewis structure.

Chemical polarity electrostatic property of a molecule

In chemistry, polarity is a separation of electric charge leading to a molecule or its chemical groups having an electric dipole moment, with a negatively charged end and a positively charged end.

Lewis structures, also known as Lewis dot diagrams, Lewis dot formulas,Lewis dot structures, electron dot structures, or Lewis electron dot structures (LEDS), are diagrams that show the bonding between atoms of a molecule and the lone pairs of electrons that may exist in the molecule. A Lewis structure can be drawn for any covalently bonded molecule, as well as coordination compounds. The Lewis structure was named after Gilbert N. Lewis, who introduced it in his 1916 article The Atom and the Molecule. Lewis structures extend the concept of the electron dot diagram by adding lines between atoms to represent shared pairs in a chemical bond.

A hypervalent molecule (the phenomenon is sometimes colloquially known as expanded octet) is a molecule that contains one or more main group elements apparently bearing more than eight electrons in their valence shells. Phosphorus pentachloride (PCl5), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), chlorine trifluoride (ClF3), the chlorite (ClO2) ion, and the triiodide (I3) ion are examples of hypervalent molecules.

In chemistry, orbital hybridisation is the concept of mixing atomic orbitals into new hybrid orbitals suitable for the pairing of electrons to form chemical bonds in valence bond theory. Hybrid orbitals are very useful in the explanation of molecular geometry and atomic bonding properties and are symmetrically disposed in space. Although sometimes taught together with the valence shell electron-pair repulsion (VSEPR) theory, valence bond and hybridisation are in fact not related to the VSEPR model.

In chemistry, the valence or valency of an element is a measure of its combining power with other atoms when it forms chemical compounds or molecules.

A 3-center 2-electron (3c–2e) bond is an electron-deficient chemical bond where three atoms share two electrons. The combination of three atomic orbitals form three molecular orbitals: one bonding, one non-bonding, and one anti-bonding. The two electrons go into the bonding orbital, resulting in a net bonding effect and constituting a chemical bond among all three atoms. In many common bonds of this type, the bonding orbital is shifted towards two of the three atoms instead of being spread equally among all three. An example of a 3c–2e bond is the trihydrogen cation H+
3
. This type of bond is also called banana bond.

Quadruple bond type of chemical bond between two atoms involving eight electrons

A quadruple bond is a type of chemical bond between two atoms involving eight electrons. This bond is an extension of the more familiar types double bonds and triple bonds. Stable quadruple bonds are most common among the transition metals in the middle of the d-block, such as rhenium, tungsten, technetium, molybdenum and chromium. Typically the ligands that support quadruple bonds are π-donors, not π-acceptors.

The 18-electron rule is a chemical rule of thumb used primarily for predicting and rationalizing formulas for stable transition metal complexes, especially organometallic compounds. The rule is based on the fact that the valence shells of transition metals consist of nine valence orbitals, which collectively can accommodate 18 electrons as either bonding or nonbonding electron pairs. This means that the combination of these nine atomic orbitals with ligand orbitals creates nine molecular orbitals that are either metal-ligand bonding or non-bonding. When a metal complex has 18 valence electrons, it is said to have achieved the same electron configuration as the noble gas in the period. The rule is not helpful for complexes of metals that are not transition metals, and interesting or useful transition metal complexes will violate the rule because of the consequences deviating from the rule bears on reactivity. The rule was first proposed by American chemist Irving Langmuir in 1921.

The bifluoride ion is an inorganic anion with the chemical formula HF
2
.

The covalent radius of fluorine is a measure of the size of a fluorine atom; it is approximated at about 60 picometres.

A molecular orbital diagram, or MO diagram, is a qualitative descriptive tool explaining chemical bonding in molecules in terms of molecular orbital theory in general and the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) method in particular. A fundamental principle of these theories is that as atoms bond to form molecules, a certain number of atomic orbitals combine to form the same number of molecular orbitals, although the electrons involved may be redistributed among the orbitals. This tool is very well suited for simple diatomic molecules such as dihydrogen, dioxygen, and carbon monoxide but becomes more complex when discussing even comparatively simple polyatomic molecules, such as methane. MO diagrams can explain why some molecules exist and others do not. They can also predict bond strength, as well as the electronic transitions that can take place.

In quantum chemistry, a natural bond orbital or NBO is a calculated bonding orbital with maximum electron density. The NBOs are one of a sequence of natural localized orbital sets that include "natural atomic orbitals" (NAO), "natural hybrid orbitals" (NHO), "natural bonding orbitals" (NBO) and "natural (semi-)localized molecular orbitals" (NLMO). These natural localized sets are intermediate between basis atomic orbitals (AO) and molecular orbitals (MO):

Stereoelectronic effect effect on molecular structures, physical properties and reactivities due to the molecules electronic structures, in particular the interaction between atomic and/or molecular orbitals

In chemistry, primarily organic and computational chemistry, a stereoelectronic effect is an effect on molecular geometry, reactivity, or physical properties due to spatial relationships in the molecules' electronic structure, in particular the interaction between atomic and/or molecular orbitals. Phrased differently, stereoelectronic effects can also be defined as the geometric constraints placed on the ground and/or transition states of molecules that arise from considerations of orbital overlap. Thus, a stereoelectronic effect explains a particular molecular property or reactivity by invoking stabilizing or destabilizing interactions that depend on the relative orientations of electrons in space.

The σ-π model and equivalent-orbital model refer to two possible representations of molecules in valence bond theory. The σ-π model differentiates bonds and lone pairs of σ symmetry from those of π symmetry, while the equivalent-orbital model hybridizes them. The σ-π treatment takes into account molecular symmetry and is better suited to interpretation of aromatic molecules, although computational calculations of certain molecules tend to optimize better under the equivalent-orbital treatment. The two representations produce the same total electron density and are related by a unitary transformation of the occupied molecular orbitals; different localization procedures yield either of the two. In a 1996 review, Kenneth B. Wiberg concluded that "although a conclusive statement cannot be made on the basis of the currently available information, it seems likely that we can continue to consider the σ/π and bent-bond descriptions of ethylene to be equivalent. Ian Fleming goes further in a 2010 textbook, noting that "the overall distribution of electrons [...] is exactly the same" in the two models. Nevertheless, as pointed out in Carroll's textbook, at lower levels of theory, the two models make different quantitative and qualitative predictions, and there has been considerable debate as to which model is most useful conceptually and pedagogically.

A chalcogen bond is an attractive interaction in the family of σ-hole interactions, along with hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds. This family of attractive interactions has been modeled as an electron donor interacting with the σ* orbital of a C-X bond. Electron density mapping is often invoked to visualize the electron density of the donor and an electrophilic region on the acceptor, referred to as a σ-hole. Chalcogen bonds, much like hydrogen and halogen bonds, have been invoked in various non-covalent interactions, such as protein folding, crystal engineering, self-assembly, catalysis, transport, sensing, templation, and drug design.

Nontrigonal pnictogen compounds

Nontrigonal pnictogen compounds refer to tricoordinate trivalent pnictogen compounds that are not of typical trigonal pyramidal molecular geometry. By virtue of their geometric constraint, these compounds exhibit distinct electronic structures and reactivities, which bestow on them potential to provide unique nonmetal platforms for bond cleavage reactions.

References

  1. Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, Alan (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN   978-0-08-037941-8. p. 897.
  2. Weinhold, F.; Landis, C. Valency and bonding, Cambridge, 2005; pp. 275-306.
  3. 1 2 Pimentel, G. C. The Bonding of Trihalide and Bifluoride Ions by the Molecular Orbital Method. J. Chem. Phys.1951, 19, 446-448. doi : 10.1063/1.1748245
  4. 1 2 Rundle, R. E. (1947-06-01). "Electron Deficient Compounds1". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 69 (6): 1327–1331. doi:10.1021/ja01198a028. hdl: 2027/mdp.39015086438440 . ISSN   0002-7863.
  5. 1 2 Rundle, R. E. Electron Deficient Compounds. II. Relative Energies of "Half-Bonds". J. Chem. Phys.1949, 17, 671–675.doi : 10.1063/1.1747367
  6. Musher, J. I. (1969-01-01). "The Chemistry of Hypervalent Molecules". Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 8 (1): 54–68. doi:10.1002/anie.196900541. ISSN   1521-3773.
  7. Langmuir, Irving (1921-07-22). "TYPES OF VALENCE" (PDF). Science. 54 (1386): 59–67. Bibcode:1921Sci....54...59L. doi:10.1126/science.54.1386.59. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   17843674.
  8. Lewis, G. N. (1923). Valence and the Structure of Atoms and Molecules. New York: The New York Catalog Co.
  9. Jensen, William B. (2006-12-01). "The Origin of the Term "Hypervalent"". Journal of Chemical Education. 83 (12): 1751. Bibcode:2006JChEd..83.1751J. doi:10.1021/ed083p1751. ISSN   0021-9584.
  10. Reed, Alan E.; Weinhold, Frank. (1986-06-01). "On the role of d orbitals in sulfur hexafluoride". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 108 (13): 3586–3593. doi:10.1021/ja00273a006. ISSN   0002-7863.
  11. Magnusson, Eric (1990-10-01). "Hypercoordinate molecules of second-row elements: d functions or d orbitals?". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 112 (22): 7940–7951. doi:10.1021/ja00178a014. ISSN   0002-7863.
  12. 1 2 3 Landrum, Gregory A.; Goldberg, Norman; Hoffmann, Roald (1997-01-01). "Bonding in the trihalides (X
    3
    ), mixed trihalides (X
    2
    Y
    ) and hydrogen bihalides (X
    2
    H
    ). The connection between hypervalent, electron-rich three-center, donor–acceptor and strong hydrogen bonding". Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions. 0 (19): 3605–3613. doi:10.1039/a703736h. ISSN   1364-5447.
  13. 1 2 Landis, C. R.; Weinhold, F. (2013-05-06). "3c/4e σ̂-Type Long-Bonding: A Novel Transitional Motif toward the Metallic Delocalization Limit". Inorganic Chemistry. 52 (9): 5154–5166. doi: 10.1021/ic4000395 . ISSN   0020-1669. PMID   23597392.