Tibet Improvement Party

Last updated

Tibet Improvement Party
Tibetan nameནུབ་བོད་ལེགས་བཅོས་སྐྱིད་སྡུག
Chinese name西藏革命黨
Leader Pandatsang Rapga
FounderPandatsang Rapga
Founded1939 (1939)
Dissolveddefunct circa 1950 (1950)
Headquarters Kalimpong
Ideology Three Principles of the People
Secularism
International affiliation Kuomintang

The Tibet Improvement Party (Tibetan : ནུབ་བོད་ལེགས་བཅོས་སྐྱིད་སྡུག, Wylie : nub-bod-legs-bcos-skyid-sdug, lit.'West Tibet Reform Association'; [1] Chinese :西藏革命黨; pinyin :Xīzàng Gémìngdǎng, lit.'Tibet Revolutionary Party') was a nationalist, revolutionary, anti-feudal and pro-Republic of China political party in Tibet. It was affiliated with the Kuomintang and was supported by mostly Khampas, with the Pandatsang family playing a key role.

Contents

Names

The Tibetan, Chinese, and English versions of the party names all have separate meanings. The Chinese name (Chinese :西藏革命黨; pinyin :Xīzàng Gémìngdǎng) means "Tibet Revolutionary Party". [2] In English, it is known as the Tibet Improvement Party or alternatively the Tibetan Progressive Party. [3] [4] The Tibetan name (Tibetan : ནུབ་བོད་ལེགས་བཅོས་སྐྱིད་སྡུག, Wylie : nub-bod-legs-bcos-skyid-sdug) translates as "West Tibet Reform Association".

Background

Gendun Chopel Gendun Chophel.jpg
Gendün Chöpel

The party was founded in 1939 in Kalimpong in India by Pandatsang Rapga, [5] who came from the extensive Pandatsang family, a wealthy wool merchant family from Kham. [6] The other core members of the movement were Thubten Kunphela, the Buddhist reformist monk Gendün Chöpel [7] and the poet Canlocen. Kunphela was the most powerful man in Tibet after the 13th Dalai Lama, Thubten Gyatso, in the period between 1931 and 1933. After the death of the Dalai Lama, Kunphela lost his dominant position and was exiled. In 1937, he managed to flee, settling in Kalimpong.

Beliefs

The party considered the then government of Tibet as entirely outdated and feudal, and sought a modern, secular government which would improve infrastructure, introduce newer technology, better education, and a standing army.

Pandatsang Rapga was strongly influenced by the ideas of Sun Yat-sen, and especially his Three Principles of the People. He believed that change in Tibet would only be possible in a manner similar to when the Qing Dynasty was overthrown in China, and borrowed the theories and ideas of the Kuomintang as the basis for his model for Tibet. The party was funded by the Kuomintang and by the Pandatsang family. It was said that Rapga "was a devout believer in the political ideology of Sun Yat-sen and had translated some of Sun's more important writings into Tibetan", including the Three Principles of the People. The Kuomintang General Huang Musong, who was also Chairman of the Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission, talked Rapga into traveling to China in 1936 to join the commission. The Tibet Improvement Party had "a hundred or so sympathizers among Khamba traders" according to Melvyn C. Goldstein. [8] Rapga hailed the three principles of Dr. Sun for helping Asian peoples against foreign imperialism and called for the feudal system to be overthrown. In addition, he stated that "The Sanmin Zhuyi was intended for all peoples under the domination of foreigners, for all those who had been deprived of the rights of man. But it was conceived especially for the Asians. It is for this reason that I translated it. At that time, a lot of new ideas were spreading in Tibet", during an interview in 1975 by Dr. Heather Stoddard. [9]

The ultimate goal of the party regarding the future of Tibet was that Tibet would become an autonomous republic within the Republic of China. Rapga stated that the party goal was revolution and "liberation of Tibet from the existing tyrannical government". [6]

It is challenging to assess the actual political power of the party. The Tibetan government of the Dalai Lama controlled the western part of Kham, constituting one-third of the entire Kham region. However, there was significant support for certain ideas of the movement. The relationship between many Khampas and the Tibetan government in Lhasa was highly negative. Hundreds of traders from Kham and a section of the Pandatsang family viewed the party as a tool to establish an independent Kham state, equally independent of both China and the Dalai Lama's Tibetan state. The 9th Panchen Lama Thubten Choekyi Nyima, who was also pro-Chinese and worked with the Republic of China, also adopted the ideas of Sun Yat-sen like Rapga. [10]

Activities

The Republic of China Kuomintang government under Chiang Kai-shek sought to extend Chinese influence in Tibet. Chiang covertly propped up and financed Rapga and his movement. Rapga wanted to battle the Tibetan Army with a pro-China Khampa militia, seeking Chiang's assistance in September 1943 right before the Cairo Conference. Rapga used the term "hopelessly ill-suited for the modern world" to describe the Tibetan government of the Dalai Lama, and the Tibet Improvement Party openly supported the Kuomintang and the Republic of China against the Lhasa government of Tibet. Chiang gave a Chinese passport to Rapga, as well as 100,000 yuan every month. [11] [12]

In 1945, Rapga sent Gendün Chöphel on a mission to Lhasa via Tawang and Bhutan to draw maps of the area, while masquerading as a pilgrim beggar monk. [13]

The end of the movement

When Rapga placed a request for 2,000 membership cards and 4,000 membership forms, the British official H. E. Richardson caught wind of his activities in Kalimpong and the existence of the Tibet Improvement Party. The British deliberated among themselves whether the Tibetan government should be tipped off about the party. [14]

On 10 April, The Tibet Improvement Party was reported to the Tibetan government by Richardson. [15] The extradition of Rapga was then demanded by the Tibetan government on 26 April. However, since Rapga declared himself a national of China,[ citation needed ] Richardson could not go through with the extradition. Richardson instead advised deportation to China. On 19 June 1946, Rapga's house was raided by the police under British orders for plotting revolution, counterfeiting, and spying. Rapga destroyed all relevant party documents beforehand, since he was tipped off by the Chinese commissioner in Delhi, but the police searched a suit pocket and found letters documenting Rapga's correspondence with the Chinese over the Tibet Improvement Party. [16] Subsequently, Rapga was ordered to be deported from British India. However, he requested assistance from the Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission in China to halt the deportation. [17] Rapga was expelled from British India in 1947 to Shanghai. Kunphela was also expelled and went to Nanjing.

In 1946, Gendün Chöpel disguised as a monk and went to Tibet on behalf of Rapga, to gather intelligence and support for the party. However, he was quickly arrested by the Tibetans and imprisoned until 1950. This event led to the end of the movement.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panchen Lama</span> Prominent figure in Tibetan Buddhism

The Panchen Lama is a tulku of the Gelug school of Tibetan Buddhism. The Panchen Lama is one of the most important figures in the Gelug tradition, with its spiritual authority second only to the Dalai Lama. Along with the council of high lamas, he is in charge of seeking out the next Dalai Lama. Panchen is a portmanteau of Pandita and Chenpo, meaning "great scholar".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kham</span> Traditional region of Tibet

Kham is one of the three traditional Tibetan regions, the others being Domey also known as Amdo in the northeast, and Ü-Tsang in central Tibet. The official name of this Tibetan region/province is Dotoe. The original residents of Kham are called Khampas, and were governed locally by chieftains and monasteries. Kham covers a land area distributed in multiple province-level administrative divisions in present-day China, most of it in Tibet Autonomous Region and Sichuan, with smaller portions located within Qinghai and Yunnan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xikang</span> Nominal former province of the Republic of China

Xikang was a nominal province formed by the Republic of China in 1939 on the initiative of prominent Sichuan warlord Liu Wenhui and retained by the early People's Republic of China. The former territory of Xikang is now divided between the Tibet Autonomous Region and Sichuan province.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thubten Choekyi Nyima, 9th Panchen Lama</span> Panchen Lama of Tibet (1883–1937)

Thubten Choekyi Nyima (1883–1937), often referred to as Choekyi Nyima, was the ninth Panchen Lama of Tibet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reting Rinpoche</span> Tibetan Buddhist title

Reting Rinpoche was a title held by abbots of Reting Monastery, a Buddhist monastery in central Tibet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xinhai Lhasa turmoil</span>

The Xinhai Lhasa turmoil was an ethnic clash in Lhasa, Tibet, as well as a series of mutinies following the Wuchang Uprising. It effectively resulted in the end of Qing rule in Tibet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ngapoi Ngawang Jigme</span> Tibetan politician (1910–2009)

Ngapoi Ngawang Jigme was a Tibetan senior official who assumed various military and political responsibilities both before and after 1951 in Tibet. He is often known simply as Ngapo in English sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1959 Tibetan uprising</span> Uprising in Lhasa, Tibet, against the Peoples Republic of China

The 1959 Tibetan uprising began on 10 March 1959, when a revolt erupted in Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, which had been under the effective control of the People's Republic of China (PRC) since the Seventeen Point Agreement was reached in 1951. The initial uprising occurred amid general Chinese-Tibetan tensions and a context of confusion, because Tibetan protesters feared that the Chinese government might arrest the 14th Dalai Lama. The protests were also fueled by anti-Chinese sentiment and separatism. At first, the uprising mostly consisted of peaceful protests, but clashes quickly erupted and the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) eventually used force to quell the protests. Some of the protesters had captured arms. The last stages of the uprising included heavy fighting, with high civilian and military losses. The 14th Dalai Lama escaped from Lhasa, while the city was fully retaken by Chinese security forces on 23 March 1959. Thousands of Tibetans were killed during the 1959 uprising, but the exact number of deaths is disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China</span> 1950–51 annexation of territory in Asia

Tibet came under the control of People's Republic of China (PRC) after the Government of Tibet signed the Seventeen Point Agreement which the 14th Dalai Lama ratified on 24 October 1951, but later repudiated on the grounds that he had rendered his approval for the agreement under duress. This occurred after attempts by the Tibetan Government to gain international recognition, efforts to modernize its military, negotiations between the Government of Tibet and the PRC, and a military conflict in the Chamdo area of western Kham in October 1950. The series of events came to be called the "Peaceful Liberation of Tibet" by the Chinese government, and the "Chinese invasion of Tibet" by the Central Tibetan Administration and the Tibetan diaspora.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phuntsok Wangyal</span> Tibetan politician

Phüntsok Wangyal Goranangpa, also known as Phüntsog Wangyal, Bapa Phüntsok Wangyal or Phünwang, was a Tibetan politician. A major figure in modern Sino-Tibetan relations, he is best known for being the founder and leader of the Tibetan Communist Party. He was arrested by the Chinese authorities in 1960 and subsequently spent 18 years in the infamous Chinese high security prison Qincheng in solitary confinement. After his release he lived in Beijing until his death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tibet (1912–1951)</span> Former de facto state in East Asia

Tibet was a de facto independent state in East Asia that lasted from the collapse of the Qing dynasty in 1912 until its annexation by the People's Republic of China in 1951.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sino-Tibetan War of 1930–1932</span> War in China and Tibet

The Sino-Tibetan War, also known as the Second Sino-Tibetan War, was a war that began in May and June 1930 when the Tibetan Army under the 13th Dalai Lama invaded the Chinese-administered eastern Kham region, and the Yushu region in Qinghai, in a struggle over control and corvée labor in Dajin Monastery. The Tibetan Army, with support of the British, easily defeated the Sichuan army, which was focused on internal fights. Ma clique warlord Ma Bufang secretly sent a telegram to Sichuan warlord Liu Wenhui and the leader of the Republic of China, Chiang Kai-shek, suggesting a joint attack on the Tibetan forces. The Republic of China then defeated the Tibetan armies and recaptured its lost territory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Chamdo</span> Military campaign by China to retake region in Tibet

The Battle of Chamdo occurred from 6 to 24 October 1950. It was a military campaign by the People's Republic of China (PRC) to take the Chamdo Region from a de facto independent Tibetan state. The campaign resulted in the capture of Chamdo and the annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pandatsang Rapga</span> Tibetan politician

Pandatsang Rapga was a Khampa revolutionary during the first half of the 20th century in Tibet. He was pro-Kuomintang and pro-Republic of China, anti-feudal, anti-communist. He believed in overthrowing the Dalai Lama's feudal regime and driving British imperialism out of Tibet, and acted on behalf of Chiang Kai-shek in countering the Dalai Lama. He was later involved in rebelling against communist rule.

The 1934 Khamba rebellion was a rebellion in the western regions of Kham in Xikang against the Tibetan Government and the Sichuan Warlord Liu Wenhui. It consisted of Khamba tribesmen led by the Pandatsang family; two brothers of the family, Pandatsang Togbye and Pandatsang Rapga, led the revolt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tibetan Army</span> Armed forces of Tibet from 1913 to 1959

The Tibetan Army was the armed forces of Tibet from 1913 to 1959. It was established by the 13th Dalai Lama shortly after he proclaimed the independence of Tibet in 1912, and was modernised with the assistance of British training and equipment. It was dissolved by the Chinese government following the failed 1959 Tibetan uprising.

In 1910, Qing China sent a military force of 2,000 troops to Tibet, then a Qing protectorate, ostensibly to assert imperial authority. It led to turmoil in Tibet and caused the Dalai Lama to flee to British India. It also caused a serious rupture in Sino-Tibetan relations that eventually led to Tibet's declaration of independence in 1912.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gyalo Thondup</span> Brother of the 14th Dalai Lama

Gyalo Thondup, born c.1927, is the second-eldest brother of the 14th Dalai Lama. He often acted as the Dalai Lama's unofficial envoy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Priest and patron relationship</span>

The priest and patron relationship, also written as priest-patron or cho-yon, is the Tibetan political theory that the relationship between Tibet and China referred to a symbiotic link between a spiritual leader and a lay patron, such as the historic relationship between the Dalai Lama and the Qing emperor. They were respectively spiritual teacher and lay patron rather than subject and lord. Chöyön is an abbreviation of two Tibetan words: chöney, "that which is worthy of being given gifts and alms", and yöndag, "he who gives gifts to that which is worthy".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thubten Kunphela</span>

Thubten Kunphel, commonly known as Kunphela, was a Tibetan politician and one of the most powerful political figures in Tibet during the later years of the 13th Dalai Lama's rule, known as the "strong man of Tibet". Kunphela was arrested and exiled after the death of the Dalai Lama in 1933. He later escaped to India and became a co-founder of the India-based Tibet Improvement Party with the aim of establishing a secular government in Tibet. He worked in Nanking after the attempt to start a revolution in Tibet failed, and returned to Tibet in 1948.

References

Citations

  1. 西藏革命党考实
  2. Original from the University of Michigan London School of Economics and Political Science (1986). Government and opposition, Volume 21. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Retrieved 27 December 2011. Tibetan (ie Xizang) Improvement Party. In Chinese: Xizang Gemingdang: Tibet Revolutionary Party. In English: Tibetan Progressist Party. « India Office Records, L/P&S/l 2/4210 Coll. 36/39, 23 October 1943. 36 Oral information.
  3. Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1989). Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland. Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland. p. 306. Retrieved 27 December 2011. Calcutta). The Chinese name for this movement was Xizang gemingdang, roughly "Revolutionary party of the Western Provinces" (Xizang being a general Chinese designation for Tibet, beside Xifan); and the English name usually given it was apparently the Tibetan Progressive Party. Heather Stoddard devotes many interesting pages to her research on this "progressive", or "revolutionary",
  4. Original from Northwestern University Government and opposition, Volume 21. London School of Economics and Political Science. 1986. Retrieved 27 December 2011. In Chinese: Xizang Gemingdang: Tibet Revolutionary Party. In English: Tibetan Progressist Party.
  5. Arpi, Claude. "The Karma of Tibet" (PDF). pp. 51, 53, 56, 66, 80, 94, 95, 96, 97. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  6. 1 2 Melvyn C. Goldstein (1991). A history of modern Tibet, 1913-1951: the demise of the Lamaist state. Vol. 1 of A History of Modern Tibet (reprint, illustrated ed.). University of California Press. p. 450. ISBN   0-520-07590-0 . Retrieved 27 December 2011.
  7. Luo, Jia (2009). REFORM IN TIBET AS A SOCIAL MOVEMENT (PDF) (A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Education Graduate Department of Sociology & Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto). pp. 32. 37. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  8. Gray Tuttle (2007). Tibetan Buddhists in the Making of Modern China (illustrated ed.). Columbia University Press. p. 152. ISBN   978-0-231-13447-7 . Retrieved 27 December 2011.
  9. Gray Tuttle (2007). Tibetan Buddhists in the Making of Modern China (illustrated ed.). Columbia University Press. p. 152. ISBN   978-0-231-13447-7 . Retrieved 27 December 2011.
  10. Gray Tuttle (2007). Tibetan Buddhists in the Making of Modern China (illustrated ed.). Columbia University Press. p.  153. ISBN   978-0-231-13447-7.
  11. Hsiao-ting Lin (2010). Modern China's ethnic frontiers: a journey to the west. Vol. 67 of Routledge studies in the modern history of Asia (illustrated ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 95. ISBN   978-0-415-58264-3 . Retrieved 27 December 2011.
  12. Lin, Hsaio-Ting (2011). Tibet and Nationalist China's Frontier: Intrigues and Ethnopolitics, 1928-49. Contemporary Chinese Studies Series. UBC Press. p. 145. ISBN   978-0774859882 . Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  13. Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1991). A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State. University of California Press. p. 453. ISBN   0520911768 . Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  14. Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1991). A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State. University of California Press. p. 454. ISBN   0520911768 . Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  15. Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1991). A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State. University of California Press. p. 456. ISBN   0520911768 . Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  16. Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1991). A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State. University of California Press. p. 458. ISBN   0520911768 . Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  17. Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1991). A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State. University of California Press. p. 460. ISBN   0520911768 . Retrieved 24 April 2014.

Cited sources