Towards Specific and Accurate Criteria to Evaluate Arab and International Strategic Studies Centers (2012/2013)

Last updated

Preface

In view of the extremely complex and overlapping domestic and international challenges, risks and threats facing the world at the internal and external levels, as well as the variety of means of dealing with them, and their diverse horizontal and vertical implications, most countries have become dependent on science and knowledge to provide solutions to the various challenges they face in order to prevent them from transforming into risks or threats. Increased attention has therefore been paid to the role played by strategic studies centers in supporting the decision-making process, devising strategies, proposing policies and informing public opinion. A number of criteria are employed to evaluate strategic studies centers and think-tanks in general, but the evaluation process is seen as lacking accuracy and impartiality, and the role of strategic research institutions is considered weak and incompatible with contemporary world developments for the following reasons:

• Absence of evaluation of a clear connection between research institutions and their three main audiences, namely policy-makers,
academic institutions and community service organizations.
• Absence of overarching criteria, whether in terms of the multiplicity of topics covered by research institutions, or the multiplicity
of activities or work within local, regional and international frameworks.
• Lack of criteria pertaining to the capacity to convey ideas, and reach out to, and influence the public through the communication
and social media channels provided by modern technologies.
• Absence of criteria pertaining to means of capitalizing on the benefits of globalization, such as cooperation agreements with
local, regional and international research institutions, and the flexibility to attain goals in agreement with experts other than
the permanent researchers of the research institution.

In view of the importance of devising a realistic, scientific and practical rating system for the most important think-tanks at both the Arab and international levels that is impartial, transparent and credible, the criteria used to evaluate strategic studies centers and their organization have been reconsidered to take into account the weaknesses highlighted above. Therefore, a set of accurate and specific criteria has been devised to evaluate Arab and international strategic studies centers.

Main Criteria for Evaluating Strategic Studies Centers

The following are the most important criteria for developing a scientific, realistic and accurate rating of Arab and international strategic studies centers:

First: Criteria associated with the nature, role and mission of the research institution

(1) The extent of the institution’s success in attaining its established goals.
(2) The volume of research activities carried out by the institution, and their diversity in terms of lectures, symposia,
conferences and discussion panels.
(3) The ability of the institution to attract elite regional and international decision-makers, intellectuals, researchers, academics
and experts to take part in its various activities.
(4) The openness to other research institutions and the implications thereof on the nature of its work, output and activities.
(5) The capacity of the research institution to respond immediately to local, regional and international events and
developments by producing reports, policy papers and studies.

Second: Criteria associated with the ability to support decision- and policy-makers

(1) The level of communication between the institution and decision- and policy-makers in the relevant country.
(2) The role of the research institution in supporting national decision-making and developing internal and external strategies
and policies.
(3) The number of reports and studies submitted to decision-makers, whether at their request or on the initiative
of the research institution itself.
(4) The extent of the research institution’s participation in the process of evaluating proposals submitted to decision-makers,
such as draft laws and executive directives.
(5) The capacity of the research institution to provide practical and realistic solutions to the challenges faced
by the community and bridge the gap between theory and practice in terms of policy.

Third: Criteria relating to the institution’s effective academic contribution

(1) The research institution’s delivery of academic periodical(s), peer-reviewed by distinguished referees.
(2) The volume of research prepared by the institution and its importance and relevance to the institution’s goals.
(3) The level of interest among researchers in publishing papers in the peer-reviewed academic periodical(s) issued by the
research institution.
(4) The number of publications issued by the research institution, and the extent of the media coverage they attract.
(5) The practical and academic services provided by the institution – such as conferences and seminars, and opportunities
for researchers to submit scholarly research.
(6) The research institution’s efforts in the academic development of human resources through internal and external
qualification and training programs, as well as the involvement of the institution’s researchers in academic fora held
by other institutions.
(1) The volume of coverage of the institution and its researchers in traditional media (newspapers/television).
(2) The research institution’s interest in communicating with the general public through social networks
(e.g., Twitter, Facebook, YouTube) and the extent of public interaction with the institution through such networks.
(3) The research institution’s delivery of periodicals issued to serve the community and address a non-specialized audience.
(4) The research institution’s role in education, qualification and training (its programs and their quality)
to serve academic research.
(5) The transparency, credibility, impartiality, and scholarly nature of the approach adopted by the institution in addressing
topics and issues of relevance to society.

Rankings of the Most Important Research and Strategic Studies Centers in the Arab World

In light of the above-mentioned criteria, and considering the fact that the following evaluation is the first serious effort to objectively and accurately examine the works of strategic studies centers and their achievement of the goals that support their three main recipients (i.e. policy-makers, academia and society), the process of evaluation resulted in the following rankings at the Arab and international levels. In order to protect its neutrality and impartiality, the ECSSR is not included in the evaluation. Furthermore, the ECSSR is a non-profit institution and does not seek any kind of funding.

01 Carnegie Middle East Center
Republic of Lebanon
02 Brookings Doha Center
State of Qatar
03 Bahrain Center for Strategic, International and Energy Studies
Kingdom of Bahrain
04 Center for Strategic and Future Studies
State of Kuwait
05 Middle East Studies Center
Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
06 Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies Arab
Republic of Egypt
07 Center for Arab Unity Studies
Republic of Lebanon
08 Dubai School of Government (DSG)
United Arab Emirates
09 King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
10 The Moroccan Interdisciplinary Center for Strategic and International Studies
Kingdom of Morocco

Rankings of the Most Important International Research and Strategic Studies Centers

Applying the above criteria to 219 strategic studies centers in the 25 non-Arab countries that have the largest number of research centers, resulted in the following rankings. In order to preserve its neutrality and impartiality, the ECSSR is not included in the evaluation. Furthermore, the ECSSR is a non-profit institution and does not seek any kind of funding.

01 Brookings Institution
United States of America
02 Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House)
United Kingdom
03 Center for Strategic and International Studies
United States of America
04 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
United States of America
05 Council on Foreign Relations
United States of America
06 International Institute for Strategic Studies
United Kingdom
07 Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Kingdom of Sweden
08 German Institute for International and Security Affairs
Federal Republic of Germany
09 RAND Corporation
United States of America
10 Jeju Peace Institute
Republic of South Korea
11 French Institute of International Relations
French Republic
12 Middle East Institute
Republic of Singapore
13 Center for European Policy Studies
Kingdom of Belgium
14 The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Utited States of America
15 Chinese Academy of Social Sciences People’s
Republic of China
16 Russian International Affairs Council
Russian Federation
17 Centre for Civil Society
Republic of India
18 Japan Institute of International Affairs
Japan
19 Shanghai Institute for International Studies
People’s Republic of China
20 Institute for National Security Studies
Israel

[1]

Related Research Articles

United Nations University Academic and research arm of the United Nations

The United Nations University (UNU), established in 1973, is the academic and research arm of the United Nations. It is headquartered in Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan, with diplomatic status as a UN institution. Since 2010, UNU has been authorized by the United Nations General Assembly to grant degrees. It also provides a bridge between the UN and the international academic, policy-making and private sector communities.

The National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS) is a U.S.-based membership organization for private, nonprofit, K-12 schools. Founded in 1963, NAIS represents independent schools and associations in the United States, including day, boarding, and day/boarding schools; elementary and secondary schools; boys', girls', and coeducational schools. NAIS has affiliate members internationally as well.

The Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) is an American think tank based in Washington, D.C., focused on the foreign policy of the United States as it pertains to the countries in the Near East. Established in 1985, the institute's mission statement says that it seeks "to advance a balanced and realistic understanding of American interests in the Middle East and to promote the policies that secure them."

German Institute for Economic Research

The German Institute for Economic Research or more commonly DIW Berlin is one of the leading economic research institutes in Germany. It is an independent, non-profit academic institution which is involved in basic research and policy advice. DIW Berlin was founded in 1925 as the Institute for Business Cycle Research and was later renamed.

Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies

The Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies is an Israeli think tank based in Tel Aviv, Israel, focused on the contemporary study and analysis of the Middle East and Africa. Its stated primary mission is to serve as a resource for decision makers and the public at large, both in Israel and internationally, though it differentiates itself from other similar organizations by refraining from recommending specific policies outright.

Geoffrey Kemp American presidential advisor

Geoffrey Kemp is an American academic and writer on international relations. He is the Director of Regional Strategic Programs at the Center for the National Interest, and has held posts in academia and in the U.S. Government.

The Health Effects Institute (HEI) is an independent, non-profit corporation specializing in research on the health effects of air pollution. It is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Van Leer Jerusalem Institute

The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute (VLJI) is a center for the interdisciplinary study and discussion of issues related to philosophy, society, culture, and education. The Institute was established in order to create a body of knowledge and discourse which gives expression to the wide range of disciplines and opinions in Israel. The contribution of a core of renowned scholars facilitates the implementation of reforms and new approaches in various social spheres.

The Begin–Sadat Center for Strategic Studies is a conservative Israeli think tank conducting policy-relevant research on Middle Eastern and global strategic affairs, particularly as they relate to the national security and foreign policy of Israel and regional peace and stability. The center's mission is to contribute to promoting peace and security in the Middle East, through policy-oriented researches on national security in the Middle East. It is located at the Social Sciences Faculty of Bar-Ilan University. The center was founded by Thomas Hecht, a Canadian-Jewish leader, and was dedicated to Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, who signed the Egypt–Israel Peace Treaty, the first peace agreement ever signed between Israel and an Arab country.

AAB College is a non-public university in Fushë Kosovë, Kosovo. It was founded in 2002 as an institution of higher education in mass communication. In 2008, it had expanded to eight departments. AAB College is the first non-public institution of higher education in Kosovo. AAB College was established after the war in Kosovo when new socio-economic and cultural circumstances appeared for Kosovo citizens by breaking so the settings of a long monopoly of education in our country.

The Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences was founded in 1958 and is China's oldest institution for the humanities and social sciences. It is the country's second largest such institution, after the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) in Beijing. Besides funds from the municipal government of Shanghai, the academy draws financial support from non-governmental sources at home and abroad.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Egypt) Runs the diplomatic relations of the Arab Republic of Egypt with other countries

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Arab Republic of Egypt is the Egyptian government ministry which oversees the foreign relations of Egypt. On 17 July 2014 Sameh Shoukry was appointed Minister of Foreign Affairs.

The Regional Center for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (RCREEE) is an intergovernmental organization with diplomatic status that aims to enable and increase the adoption of renewable energy and energy efficiency practices in the Arab region. RCREEE teams with regional governments and global organizations to initiate and lead clean energy policy dialogues, strategies, technologies and capacity development in order to increase Arab states' share of tomorrow's energy.

Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research organization

Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research (JIPR), formerly the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies, is an independent policy think tank located in Jerusalem, Israel. The Institute conducts policy studies on Jerusalem, innovation policy (R&D), environmental policy and the management of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The Institute's studies and recommendations serve as resources for governmental bodies, public institutions, civil organizations and the public.

Center for Strategic Studies under the President of Azerbaijan

The Center for Strategic Studies under the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan (SAM) is Azerbaijan’s first governmental, non-profit think tank founded on November 12, 2007 by the Decree of the President, Ilham Aliyev. Its headquarters is in Baku, Azerbaijan.

Marine Corps War College Military training institution in the United States of America

The Marine Corps War College (MCWAR), is the senior school of the Marine Corps University, providing Joint Professional Military Education (JPME) to selected United States military officers, civilian Government officials, and international military officers. The College prepares officers for future senior command and staff responsibilities requiring exceptional operational competence, sound military judgment, and strategic thinking. The college is located within the Marine Corps University aboard Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia.

Bassma Kodmani Syrian academic

Bassma Kodmani is a Syrian academic and former spokesperson of the Syrian National Council. She is the Executive Director of the Arab Reform Initiative, a network of independent Arab research and policy institutes working to promote democracy in the Arab world.

The Partnership for Peace Consortium is a network of over 800 defense academies and security studies institutes across 60 countries. Founded in 1998 during the NATO Summit, the PfPC was chartered to promote defense institution building and foster regional stability through multinational education and research, which the PfPC accomplishes via a network of educators and researchers. It is based at the George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies in Garmisch, Germany. According to the PfPC Annual Report of 2012, in 2012 eight hundred defense academies and security studies institutes in 59 countries worked with the PfPC in 69 defense education/defense institution building and policy-relevant events. The Consortium publishes an academic quarterly journal CONNECTIONS in English and Russian. The journal is run by an international Editorial Board of experts and is distributed to over 1,000 institutions in 54 countries.

The Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP) is a semi-autonomous research unit under Thailand’s Ministry of Public Health. It was established in 2007 as a non-profit organization in order to take responsibility for appraising a wide range of health technologies and programs, including pharmaceuticals, medical devices, interventions, individual and community health promotion, and disease prevention as well as social health policy to inform policy decisions in Thailand. HITAP assumes an advisory role to health governmental authorities by providing rigorous scientific evidence through professional assessment of health data in support of public decision-making. These assessments cover a range of topics including system design, selection of technologies for assessment, and the actual assessment of those selected and agreed upon by relevant government agencies. In this effort, HITAP publishes research and studies in the following areas: methodological development, databases and guidelines; knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) and capacity development; technology assessments on drugs, medical devices, medical procedures, disease prevention and health promotion measures; benefit packages of care – mixing screening and treatments; and other public health policies, e.g. evaluation of Thailand’s government compulsory license policy.

CERCA Institute

Centres de Recerca de Catalunya is the corporative denomination of a group of centers of excellence based in Catalonia, called CERCA Centers, and the institution that coordinates them, called CERCA or I-CERCA.

References

  1. http://www.ecssr.ae