Trust in numbers

Last updated
Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life
Author Theodore Porter
LanguageEnglish
Subjects Sociology of quantification
Politics
History of Statistics
Publisher Princeton University Press
Publication date
1995
Pages328
ISBN 978-0691029085

Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life is a book by Theodore Porter, published in 1995 by Princeton University Press, [1] that proposes that quantification in public life is driven by bureaucratic necessities to obtain legitimacy through objectivity.

Contents

Synopsis

In 'Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life', Theodore Porter reverses the classic notion that quantification descends from the successes of natural sciences being adopted by other disciplines, to investigate instead the opposite movement, whereby quantification is driven by political, administrative and bureaucratic necessities to standardize, communicate, and obtain legitimacy through objectivity. [2]

The appeal of numbers is especially compelling to bureaucratic officials who lack the mandate of a popular election, or divine right, p. 8. [1]

After noting how officials fear being criticized for arbitrariness and bias, he concludes:

A decision made by the numbers (or by explicit rules of some other sort) has at least the appearance of being fair and impersonal, p. 8. [1]

Thus, "trust may sometimes be based less on the solidity of the numbers themselves than on the needs of expert and client communities". [3]

Main

Defined as the book that comes closest to establishing a common theoretical language for Sociology of quantification, [4] the work of Porter adopts a historical and sociological style of analysis that is indebted to Bruno Latour and Steven Shapin. [2] An important element of Porter's analysis concerns the meaning of objectivity and how it has arisen historically, and what role numbers have played in its construction. [2] For Porter, 'mechanical objectivity' is sought and obtained via quantitative methods that ensure a procedural forms of accountability. He calls these procedures 'technologies of distance' that ensure compliance with impersonal rules excluding bias and personal preferences. [5]

Based on a number of case studies in different countries - actuaries in the UK and US, engineers in France and in the US - Porter demonstrates that the allure of quantitative and standardized measures does not derive from their success in the natural sciences, but arise from the need of professional groups to "respond to external social and political pressures demanding accountability". [5]

The author traces the history of Cost-benefit analysis in a way that make evident the bureaucratic and political conflicts whereby actuaries and experts of different disciplines fought to maintain structures of power and privilege within national styles and contexts. In the US, tensions existed between the Bureau of Reclamation and the Army Corp of Engineers. Each institutions produced cost benefit analyses that were designed to favor the respective interests of the two institutions and their respective stakeholders. In Victorian England actuaries and the accountants fought to thwart attempts by the authorities to introduce standards of accounting, as to defend the nuanced expertise of the respective crafts. [3] In a sense, the work of Porter makes clear how objectivity is an alternative to personal trust. [6] He illustrate the point by comparing the practices and contexts of the Army Corp of Engineers in the US versus those of Les Ingénieurs des Ponts et Chaussées in France, pp. 114–190. [1]

The very last chapter of Trust In Numbers shows - following a critical path opened by Sharon Traweek, p. 222 [1] - that in the most highly developed and leading research communities, for example among high-energy physicists, numbers and quantification are not center stage - a place that is taken by a community of trust, where a “personal knowledge” is at play, that ensures the creativity and vitality of the discipline, a point made by other STS scholars. [7] [8] As noted by the author, the quantitative element of 'mechanical objectivity' is more present in academic fields like economics, sociology and psychology than they are in physics. This chapter has been suggested as the most relevant for practicing research scientists. [3]

For sociologist Trevor Pinch the most important aspect of this book is to demystify the concept that the more mathematical the science the higher its prestige, and to achieve this through a comparative investigation of how different sciences make use of mathematics in different contexts". [2]

"Trust in Numbers" has been suggested as of particular relevance to the field of Digital Humanities. [6]

Reception

In 1997, Porter was awarded the Ludwik Fleck Prize for Trust in Numbers. [5] More than 40 reviews have been written about the book, including from Michel Callon, Philip Mirowski, Sheila Jasanoff, Roy MacLeod, Mary S. Morgan, Trevor Pinch, Jerry Ravetz, Jessica Riskin, E. Roy Weintraub, and many others. [5]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social science</span> Branch of science that studies society and its relationships

Social science is one of the branches of science, devoted to the study of societies and the relationships among members within those societies. The term was formerly used to refer to the field of sociology, the original "science of society", established in the 18th century. In addition to sociology, it now encompasses a wide array of academic disciplines, including anthropology, archaeology, economics, geography, linguistics, management, communication studies, psychology, culturology and political science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Authority</span> Legitimate power to decide or authorize

Authority is commonly understood as the legitimate power of a person or group over other people. In a civil state, authority may be practiced by legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government, each of which has authority and is an authority. The term "authority" has many nuances and distinctions within various academic fields ranging from sociology to political science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Science studies</span> Research area analyzing scientific expertise

Science studies is an interdisciplinary research area that seeks to situate scientific expertise in broad social, historical, and philosophical contexts. It uses various methods to analyze the production, representation and reception of scientific knowledge and its epistemic and semiotic role.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantitative research</span> All procedures for the numerical representation of empirical facts

Quantitative research is a research strategy that focuses on quantifying the collection and analysis of data. It is formed from a deductive approach where emphasis is placed on the testing of theory, shaped by empiricist and positivist philosophies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Science and technology studies</span> Academic field

Science and technology studies (STS) or science, technology, and society is an interdisciplinary field that examines the creation, development, and consequences of science and technology in their historical, cultural, and social contexts.

Rational-legal authority is a form of leadership in which the authority of an organization or a ruling regime is largely tied to legal rationality, legal legitimacy and bureaucracy. The majority of the modern states of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries are rational-legal authorities, according to those who use this form of classification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public sociology</span> Subfield of sociology

Public sociology is a subfield of the wider sociological discipline that emphasizes expanding the disciplinary boundaries of sociology in order to engage with non-academic audiences. It is perhaps best understood as a style of sociology rather than a particular method, theory, or set of political values. Since the twenty-first century, the term has been widely associated with University of California, Berkeley sociologist Michael Burawoy, who delivered an impassioned call for a disciplinary embrace of public sociology in his 2004 American Sociological Association (ASA) presidential address. In his address, Burawoy contrasts public sociology with what he terms "professional sociology", a form of sociology that is concerned primarily with addressing other academic sociologists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social construction of technology</span> Theory in science and technology studies

Social construction of technology (SCOT) is a theory within the field of science and technology studies. Advocates of SCOT—that is, social constructivists—argue that technology does not determine human action, but that rather, human action shapes technology. They also argue that the ways a technology is used cannot be understood without understanding how that technology is embedded in its social context. SCOT is a response to technological determinism and is sometimes known as technological constructivism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theodore Porter</span> American historian (born 1953)

Theodore M. Porter is a professor who specializes in the history of science in the Department of History at UCLA. He has authored several books, including The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820-1900; and Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, the latter a vast reference for sociology of quantification. His most recent book, published by Princeton University Press in 2018, is Genetics in the Madhouse: The Unknown History of Human Heredity. He graduated from Stanford University with an A.B. in history in 1976 and earned a Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1981. In 2008, he was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. In 2023, he received the George Sarton Medal for lifetime achievement from the History of Science Society.

The history of the social sciences has its origins in the common stock of Western philosophy and shares various precursors, but began most intentionally in the early 18th century with the positivist philosophy of science. Since the mid-20th century, the term "social science" has come to refer more generally, not just to sociology but to all those disciplines which analyze society and culture, from anthropology to psychology to media studies.

In mathematics and empirical science, quantification is the act of counting and measuring that maps human sense observations and experiences into quantities. Quantification in this sense is fundamental to the scientific method.

Sensitivity auditing is an extension of sensitivity analysis for use in policy-relevant modelling studies. Its use is recommended - i.a. in the European Commission Impact assessment guidelines and by the European Science Academies- when a sensitivity analysis (SA) of a model-based study is meant to demonstrate the robustness of the evidence provided by the model in the context whereby the inference feeds into a policy or decision-making process.

<i>Science on the Verge</i> 2016 book

Science on the verge is a book written in 2016 by group of eight scholars working in the tradition of Post-normal science. The book analyzes the main features and possible causes of the present science's crisis.

Quantitative storytelling (QST) is a systematic approach to exploring the many frames potentially legitimate in a scientific study or controversy. QST assumes that, in an interconnected society, multiple frameworks and worldviews are legitimately upheld by different entities and social actors. QST looks critically at models used in evidence-based policy. Such models are often reductionist in that tractability is achieved at the expense of suppressing available evidence. QST suggests corrective approaches to this practice.

The sociologyof quantification is the investigation of quantification as a sociological phenomenon in its own right.

Ethics of quantification is the study of the ethical issues associated to different forms of visible or invisible forms of quantification. These could include algorithms, metrics/indicators, statistical and mathematical modelling, as noted in a review of various aspects of sociology of quantification.

The French movement of statactivism advocates for the mobilization of statistics in support to social movements and agendas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrea Saltelli</span> Italian researcher (born 1953)

Andrea Saltelli is an Italian scholar specializing in quantification using statistical and sociological tools. He has extended the theory of sensitivity analysis to sensitivity auditing, focusing on physical chemistry, environmental statistics, impact assessment and science for policy. He is currently Counsellor at the UPF Barcelona School of Management.

<i>The Politics of Large Numbers</i> 1998 book by Alain Desrosières (English translation of 1993 original

The Politics of Large Numbers:A History of Statistical Reasoning is a book by French statistician, sociologist and historian of science, Alain Desrosières, which was originally published in French in 1993. The English translation, by Camille Naish, was published in 1998 by Harvard University Press.

<i>The New Politics of Numbers</i> 2022 book by multiple authors

The New Politics of Numbers: Utopia, evidence and democracy is a multi-author book edited by sociologists Andrea Mennicken and Robert Salais and published in 2022 by Palgrave Macmillan.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton University Press.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Pinch, T. (1996). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Theodore M. Porter. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1786–1787.
  3. 1 2 3 Ravetz, J. R. (1997). In Numbers We Trust | Issues in Science and Technology. Issues in Science and Technology, 13(2). Retrieved from https://issues.org/ravetz/.
  4. ↑ Popp Berman, E., & Hirschman, D. (2018). The Sociology of Quantification: Where Are We Now? Contemporary Sociology, 47(3), 257–266.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Hagendijk, R. (1999). An Agenda for STS: Porter on Trust and Quantification in Science, Politics and Society. Social Studies of Science, 29(4), 629–637.
  6. 1 2 Koller, G. (2012, October 4). Trust in Numbers. Review for the Digital Humanities. Retrieved from https://wethink.hypotheses.org/758.
  7. ↑ Collins, H. M. (1975). The Seven Sexes: A Study in the Sociology of a Phenomenon, or the Replication of Experiments in Physics. Sociology, 9(2), 205–224.
  8. ↑ Ravetz, J. R. (1971). Scientific knowledge and its social problems, Oxford University Press.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.