Last updated

Temporal range:
Cambrian Stage 3 Present,
518–0  Ma [1]
Vertebrata 002.png
Diversity of vertebrates: Acipenser oxyrinchus (Actinopterygii), an African bush elephant (Tetrapoda), a tiger shark (Chondrichthyes) and a river lamprey (Agnatha).
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Superphylum: Deuterostomia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Olfactores
Subphylum: Vertebrata
J-B. Lamarck, 1801 [2]

Ossea Batsch, 1788 [2]

Vertebrates ( /ˈvɜːrtəbrɪts,-ˌbrts/ ) [3] are deuterostomal animals with bony or cartilaginous axial endoskeleton — known as the vertebral column, spine or backbone — around and along the spinal cord, including all fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. The vertebrates consist of all the taxa within the subphylum Vertebrata ( /ˌvɜːrtəˈbrtə/ ) [4] (chordates with backbones) and represent the overwhelming majority of the phylum Chordata, with currently about 69,963 species described. [5]


Vertebrates comprise groups such as the following infraphyla and classes:

Extant vertebrates vary in body lengths ranging from the frog species Paedophryne amauensis , at as little as 7.7 mm (0.30 in), to the blue whale, at up to 33 m (108 ft). Vertebrates make up less than five percent of all described animal species; the rest are described as invertebrates, an informal polyphyletic group comprising all that lack vertebral columns, which include non-vertebrate chordates such as lancelets.

The vertebrates traditionally include the hagfish, which do not have proper vertebrae due to their loss in evolution, [7] though their closest living relatives, the lampreys, do. [8] Hagfish do, however, possess a cranium. For this reason, the vertebrate subphylum is sometimes referred to as Craniata or "craniates" when discussing morphology. Molecular analysis since 1992 has suggested that hagfish are most closely related to lampreys, [9] and so also are vertebrates in a monophyletic sense. Others consider them a sister group of vertebrates in the common taxon of Craniata. [10]


The word vertebrate derives from the Latin word vertebratus (Pliny), meaning joint of the spine. [11] A similarly derived word is vertebra , which refers to any of the irregular bones or segments of the spinal column. [12]

Anatomy and morphology

All vertebrates are built along the basic chordate body plan: a rigid axial endoskeleton (vertebral column and/or notochord) running along the length of the animal, [13] dorsal to the gut tube, with a hollow dorsal nerve cord (the neural tube, which develops into the brain and spinal cord) running more dorsal to it. The endoskeleton continues beyond the anus and often forms an elongated tail (post-anal tail). [14] All vertebrates also possess pharyngeal arches, as well as an iodine-concentrating organ called the endostyle, which develops into the thyroid in adults.

Vertebral column

Fossilized skeleton (cast) of Diplodocus carnegii, showing an extreme example of the backbone that characterizes the vertebrates. Naturkundemuseum Berlin - Dinosaurierhalle.jpg
Fossilized skeleton (cast) of Diplodocus carnegii , showing an extreme example of the backbone that characterizes the vertebrates.

With only one exception, the defining characteristic of all vertebrate is the vertebral column, in which the embryonic notochord found in all chordates is replaced by a segmented series of mineralized elements called vertebrae separated by fibrocartilaginous intervertebral discs, which are derived embryonically and evolutionarily from the notochord. Hagfish are the only extant vertebrate whose notochord persists and is not integrated/ replaced by the vertebral column.

A few vertebrates have secondarily lost this feature and retain the notochord into adulthood, such as the sturgeon [15] and coelacanth. Jawed vertebrates are typified by paired appendages (fins or limbs, which may be secondarily lost), but this trait is not required to qualify an animal as a vertebrate.


Gill arches bearing gills in a pike Gills (esox).jpg
Gill arches bearing gills in a pike

All basal vertebrates are aquatic and breathe with gills. The gills are carried right behind the head, bordering the posterior margins of a series of openings from the pharynx to the exterior. Each gill is supported by a cartilaginous or bony gill arch. [16] The bony fish have three pairs of arches, cartilaginous fish have five to seven pairs, while the primitive jawless fish have seven. The vertebrate ancestor no doubt had more arches than this, as some of their chordate relatives have more than 50 pairs of gills. [14] In jawed vertebrates, the first gill arch pair evolved into the jointed jaws and form an additional oral cavity ahead of the pharynx. Research also suggests that the sixth branchial arch contributed to the formation of the vertebrate shoulder, which separated the head from the body. [17]

In amphibians and some primitive bony fishes, the larvae bear external gills, branching off from the gill arches. [18] These are reduced in adulthood, their function taken over by the gills proper in fishes and by lungs in most amphibians. Some amphibians retain the external larval gills in adulthood, the complex internal gill system as seen in fish apparently being irrevocably lost very early in the evolution of tetrapods. [19]

While the more derived vertebrates lack gills, the gill arches form during fetal development, and form the basis of essential structures such as jaws, the thyroid gland, the larynx, the columella (corresponding to the stapes in mammals) and, in mammals, the malleus and incus. [14]

Central nervous system

The central nervous system of vertebrates is based on the hollow dorsal nerve cord running along the dorsal aspect of the notochord. Of particular importance and unique to vertebrates is the presence of neural crest cells, which are progenitor cells critical to coordinating the functions of cellular components. [20] Neural crest cells migrate through the body from the dorsal nerve cord during development, and initiate the formation of neuronal ganglia and structures such as the jaws and skull. [21] [22] [23] The peripheral nervous system forms when neural crest cells branch out laterally from the dorsal nerve cord and migrate together with the mesodermal somites to innervate the various different structures that develop in the body.

The vertebrates are the only chordate group with neural cephalization, and their neural functions are centralized towards a series of vesicular enlargements in the head, which give rise to a brain. A slight swelling of the anterior end of the nerve cord is found in invertebrate chordates such as lancelets (a sister subphylum known as the cephalochordates), though it lacks eyes and other complex special sense organs comparable to those of vertebrates. Other chordates do not show any trends towards cephalization. [14]

The rostral end of the neural tube is expanded by a thickening of the walls and expansion of the central canal of spinal cord into three primary brain vesicles: the prosencephalon (forebrain), mesencephalon (midbrain) and rhombencephalon (hindbrain), which are further differentiated in the various vertebrate groups. [24] Two laterally placed retinas and optical nerves form around outgrowths from the midbrain, except in hagfish, though this may be a secondary loss. [25] [26] The forebrain is more well-developed in most tetrapods and subdivided into the telencephalon and diencephalon, while the midbrain dominates in many fish and some salamanders. Vesicles of the brain are usually bilaterally symmetrical, giving rise to the paired cerebral hemispheres in mammals. [24]

The resulting anatomy of the central nervous system with a single hollow nerve cord dorsal to the gut tube, headed by a series of (typically paired) brain vesicles, is unique to vertebrates. Other invertebrates with well-developed central nervous systems such as arthropods and cephalopods, have a ventral nerve cord made of segmental ganglia on the opposite side of the gut tube, with a split brain stem circumventing the foregut around each side to form a brain on the dorsal side of the mouth. [14]

Another distinct neural feature of vertebrates is the axonal/dendritic myelination in both central (via oligodendrocytes) and peripheral nerves (via neurolemmocytes). Although myelin insulation is not unique to vertebrates — many annelids and arthropods also have myelin sheath formed by glia cells, with the Kuruma shrimp having twice the conduction velocity of any vertebrates — vertebrate myelination is annular and non-fenestrated, and the combination of myelination and encephalization have given vertebrates a unique advantage in developing higher neural functions such as complex motor coordination and cognition. It also allows vertebrates to evolve larger sizes while still maintaining considerable body reactivity, speed and agility (in contrast, invertebrates typically become sensorily slower and motorically clumsier with larger sizes), which are crucial for the eventual adaptive success of vertebrates in seizing dominant niches of higher trophic levels in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Molecular signatures

In addition to the morphological characteristics used to define vertebrates (i.e. the presence of a notochord, the development of a vertebral column from the notochord, a dorsal nerve cord, pharyngeal gills, a post-anal tail, etc.), molecular markers known as conserved signature indels (CSIs) in protein sequences have been identified and provide distinguishing criteria for the subphylum Vertebrata. [27] Specifically, 5 CSIs in the following proteins: protein synthesis elongation factor-2 (EF-2), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3), adenosine kinase (AdK) and a protein related to ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase are exclusively shared by all vertebrates and reliably distinguish them from all other metazoan. [27] The CSIs in these protein sequences are predicted to have important functionality in vertebrates.

A specific relationship between Vertebrates and Tunicates is also strongly supported by two CSIs found in the proteins Rrp44 (associated with exosome complex) and serine palmitoyltransferase, that are exclusively shared by species from these two subphyla but not Cephalochordates, indicating Vertebrates are more closely related to Tunicates than Cephalochordates. [27]

Evolutionary history

External relationships

Originally, the "Notochordata hypothesis" suggested that the Cephalochordata is the sister taxon to Craniata (Vertebrata). This group, called the Notochordata, was placed as sister group to the Tunicata (Urochordata). Although this was once the leading hypothesis, [28] studies since 2006 analyzing large sequencing datasets strongly support Olfactores (tunicates + vertebrates) as a monophyletic clade, [29] [30] [27] and the placement of Cephalochordata as sister-group to Olfactores (known as the "Olfactores hypothesis"). As chordates, they all share the presence of a notochord, at least during a stage of their life cycle.

The following cladogram summarizes the systematic relationships between the Olfactores (vertebrates and tunicates) and the Cephalochordata.


  Amphioxiformes (lancelets)  Branchiostoma lanceolatum (Amphioxus lanceolatus).png


  Tunicata/Urochordata (sea squirts, salps, larvaceans)  Salpa scheme.png


 Vertebrata  Haikouichthys4.png

First vertebrates

The early vertebrate Haikouichthys Haikouichthys cropped.jpg
The early vertebrate Haikouichthys

Vertebrates originated during the Cambrian explosion, which saw a rise in organism diversity. The earliest known vertebrates belongs to the Chengjiang biota [31] and lived about 518 million years ago. [1] These include Haikouichthys , Myllokunmingia , [31] Zhongjianichthys , [32] and probably Haikouella . [33] Unlike the other fauna that dominated the Cambrian, these groups had the basic vertebrate body plan: a notochord, rudimentary vertebrae, and a well-defined head and tail. [34] All of these early vertebrates lacked jaws in the common sense and relied on filter feeding close to the seabed. [35] [ page needed ] A vertebrate group of uncertain phylogeny, small eel-like conodonts, are known from microfossils of their paired tooth segments from the late Cambrian to the end of the Triassic. [36]

From fish to amphibians

Acanthostega, a fish-like early labyrinthodont. Acanthostega BW.jpg
Acanthostega , a fish-like early labyrinthodont.

The first jawed vertebrates may have appeared in the late Ordovician (~445 mya) and became common in the Devonian period, often known as the "Age of Fishes". [37] The two groups of bony fishes, the actinopterygii and sarcopterygii, evolved and became common. [38] The Devonian also saw the demise of virtually all jawless fishes save for lampreys and hagfish, as well as the Placodermi, a group of armoured fish that dominated the entirety of that period since the late Silurian as well as the eurypterids, dominant animals of the preceding Silurian, and the anomalocarids. By the middle of the Devonian, several droughts, anoxic events and oceanic competition lead a lineage of sarcopterygii to leave water, eventually establishing themselves as terrestrial tetrapods in the succeeding Carboniferous.

Mesozoic vertebrates

Amniotes branched from amphibious tetrapods early in the Carboniferous period. The synapsid amniotes were dominant during the late Paleozoic, the Permian, while diapsid amniotes became dominant during the Mesozoic. In the sea, the teleosts and sharks became dominant. Mesothermic synapsids called cynodonts gave rise to endothermic mammals and diapsids called dinosaurs eventually gave rise to endothermic birds, both in the Jurassic. [39] After all dinosaurs except birds went extinct by the end of the Cretaceous, birds and mammals diversified and filled their niches.

After the Mesozoic

The Cenozoic world saw great diversification of bony fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. [40] [41]

Over half of all living vertebrate species (about 32,000 species) are fish (non-tetrapod craniates), a diverse set of lineages that inhabit all the world's aquatic ecosystems, from snow minnows (Cypriniformes) in Himalayan lakes at elevations over 4,600 metres (15,100 feet) to flatfishes (order Pleuronectiformes) in the Challenger Deep, the deepest ocean trench at about 11,000 metres (36,000 feet). Many fish varieties are the main predators in most of the world's freshwater and marine water bodies . The rest of the vertebrate species are tetrapods, a single lineage that includes amphibians (with roughly 7,000 species); mammals (with approximately 5,500 species); and reptiles and birds (with about 20,000 species divided evenly between the two classes). Tetrapods comprise the dominant megafauna of most terrestrial environments and also include many partially or fully aquatic groups (e.g., sea snakes, penguins, cetaceans).


There are several ways of classifying animals. Evolutionary systematics relies on anatomy, physiology and evolutionary history, which is determined through similarities in anatomy and, if possible, the genetics of organisms. Phylogenetic classification is based solely on phylogeny. [42] Evolutionary systematics gives an overview; phylogenetic systematics gives detail. The two systems are thus complementary rather than opposed. [43]

Traditional classification

Traditional spindle diagram of the evolution of the vertebrates at class level Spindle diagram.jpg
Traditional spindle diagram of the evolution of the vertebrates at class level

Conventional classification has living vertebrates grouped into seven classes based on traditional interpretations of gross anatomical and physiological traits. This classification is the one most commonly encountered in school textbooks, overviews, non-specialist, and popular works. The extant vertebrates are: [14]

In addition to these, there are two classes of extinct armoured fishes, the Placodermi and the Acanthodii, both considered paraphyletic.

Other ways of classifying the vertebrates have been devised, particularly with emphasis on the phylogeny of early amphibians and reptiles. An example based on Janvier (1981, 1997), Shu et al. (2003), and Benton (2004) [44] is given here († = extinct):

Diversity of various groups of vertebrates through the geologic ages. The width of the bubbles signifies the diversity (number of families). Fish evolution.png
Diversity of various groups of vertebrates through the geologic ages. The width of the bubbles signifies the diversity (number of families).

While this traditional classification is orderly, most of the groups are paraphyletic, i.e. do not contain all descendants of the class's common ancestor. [44] For instance, descendants of the first reptiles include modern reptiles, mammals and birds; the agnathans have given rise to the jawed vertebrates; the bony fishes have given rise to the land vertebrates; the traditional "amphibians" have given rise to the reptiles (traditionally including the synapsids or mammal-like "reptiles"), which in turn have given rise to the mammals and birds. Most scientists working with vertebrates use a classification based purely on phylogeny, [45] organized by their known evolutionary history and sometimes disregarding the conventional interpretations of their anatomy and physiology.

Phylogenetic relationships

In phylogenetic taxonomy, the relationships between animals are not typically divided into ranks but illustrated as a nested "family tree" known as a phylogenetic tree. The cladogram below is based on studies compiled by Philippe Janvier and others for the Tree of Life Web Project and Delsuc et al., [46] [47] and complemented (based on [48] , [49] and [50] ). A dagger (†) denotes an extinct clade, whereas all other clades have living descendants.

The galeaspid Nochelaspis maeandrine from the Devonian period NochelaspisMaeandrine-PaleozoologicalMuseumOfChina-May23-08.jpg
The galeaspid Nochelaspis maeandrine from the Devonian period
The placoderm Dunkleosteus terrelli from the Devonian period Dunkleosteus terrelli - Cleveland Museum of Natural History - 2014-12-26 (21137540331).jpg
The placoderm Dunkleosteus terrelli from the Devonian period
The acanthodian fish Diplacanthus acus from the Devonian period Diplacanthus acus (acanthodian fish) from Waterloo Farm.jpg
The acanthodian fish Diplacanthus acus from the Devonian period
The early ray-fin Cheirolepis canadensis from the Devonian period Cheirolepis canadensis.jpg
The early ray-fin Cheirolepis canadensis from the Devonian period
The tetrapodomorph Tiktaalik roseae from the Devonian period Tiktaalik roseae.jpg
The tetrapodomorph Tiktaalik roseae from the Devonian period
The early tetrapod Seymouria from the Permian period Seymouria Tambach Lovers.jpg
The early tetrapod Seymouria from the Permian period
The synapsid "mammal-like reptile" Dimetrodon limbatus from the Permian period Tellus Dimetrodon.jpg
The synapsid "mammal-like reptile" Dimetrodon limbatus from the Permian period
The bird-like dinosaur Archaeopteryx lithographica from the Jurassic period Archaeopteryx fossil.jpg
The bird-like dinosaur Archaeopteryx lithographica from the Jurassic period

Note that, as shown in the cladogram above, the †"Ostracodermi" (armoured jawless fishes) and †"Placodermi" (armoured jawed fishes) are shown to be paraphylectic groups, separated from Gnathostomes and Eugnathostomes respectively. [51] [52]

Also note that Teleostei (Neopterygii) and Tetrapoda (amphibians, mammals, reptiles, birds) each make up about 50% of today's vertebrate diversity, while all other groups are either extinct or rare. The next cladogram shows the extant clades of tetrapods (the four-limbed vertebrates), and a selection of extinct (†) groups:

Note that reptile-like amphibians, mammal-like reptiles, and non-avian dinosaurs are all paraphyletic.

The placement of hagfish on the vertebrate tree of life has been controversial. Their lack of proper vertebrae (among with other characteristics found in lampreys and jawed vertebrates) led phylogenetic analyses based on morphology to place them outside Vertebrata. Molecular data, however, indicates they are vertebrates closely related to lampreys. A study by Miyashita et al. (2019), 'reconciliated' the two types of analysis as it supports the Cyclostomata hypothesis using only morphological data. [53]

Number of extant species

The number of described vertebrate species are split between tetrapods and fish. The following table lists the number of described extant species for each vertebrate class as estimated in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2014.3. [54]

Vertebrate groupsImageClassEstimated number of
described species [54] [55]
totals [54]


so need to
in water
Jawless Fish Eptatretus polytrema.jpg Myxini
Eudontomyzon danfordi Tiszai ingola.jpg Hyperoartia
Jawed Shark fish chondrichthyes.jpg cartilaginous
Carassius wild golden fish 2013 G1.jpg ray-finned
Coelacanth-bgiu.png lobe-finned
Tetrapods Lithobates pipiens.jpg amphibians 7,30233,278


adapted to
on land
Florida Box Turtle Digon3.jpg reptiles 10,711
Squirrel (PSF).png mammals 5,513
Secretary bird (Sagittarius serpentarius) 2.jpg birds 10,425
Total described species66,178

The IUCN estimates that 1,305,075 extant invertebrate species have been described, [54] which means that less than 5% of the described animal species in the world are vertebrates.

Vertebrate species databases

The following databases maintain (more or less) up-to-date lists of vertebrate species:

Reproductive systems

Nearly all vertebrates undergo sexual reproduction. They produce haploid gametes by meiosis. The smaller, motile gametes are spermatozoa and the larger, non-motile gametes are ova. These fuse by the process of fertilisation to form diploid zygotes, which develop into new individuals.


During sexual reproduction, mating with a close relative (inbreeding) often leads to inbreeding depression. Inbreeding depression is considered to be largely due to expression of deleterious recessive mutations. [56] The effects of inbreeding have been studied in many vertebrate species.

In several species of fish, inbreeding was found to decrease reproductive success. [57] [58] [59]

Inbreeding was observed to increase juvenile mortality in 11 small animal species. [60]

A common breeding practice for pet dogs is mating between close relatives (e.g. between half- and full siblings). [61] This practice generally has a negative effect on measures of reproductive success, including decreased litter size and puppy survival. [62] [63] [64]

Incestuous matings in birds result in severe fitness costs due to inbreeding depression (e.g. reduction in hatchability of eggs and reduced progeny survival). [65] [66] [67]

Inbreeding avoidance

As a result of the negative fitness consequences of inbreeding, vertebrate species have evolved mechanisms to avoid inbreeding.

Numerous inbreeding avoidance mechanisms operating prior to mating have been described. Toads and many other amphibians display breeding site fidelity. Individuals that return to natal ponds to breed will likely encounter siblings as potential mates. Although incest is possible, Bufo americanus siblings rarely mate. [68] These toads likely recognize and actively avoid close kin as mates. Advertisement vocalizations by males appear to serve as cues by which females recognize their kin. [68]

Inbreeding avoidance mechanisms can also operate subsequent to copulation. In guppies, a post-copulatory mechanism of inbreeding avoidance occurs based on competition between sperm of rival males for achieving fertilization. [69] In competitions between sperm from an unrelated male and from a full sibling male, a significant bias in paternity towards the unrelated male was observed. [69]

When female sand lizards mate with two or more males, sperm competition within the female's reproductive tract may occur. Active selection of sperm by females appears to occur in a manner that enhances female fitness. [70] On the basis of this selective process, the sperm of males that are more distantly related to the female are preferentially used for fertilization, rather than the sperm of close relatives. [70] This preference may enhance the fitness of progeny by reducing inbreeding depression.


Mating with unrelated or distantly related members of the same species is generally thought to provide the advantage of masking deleterious recessive mutations in progeny [71] (see heterosis). Vertebrates have evolved numerous diverse mechanisms for avoiding close inbreeding and promoting outcrossing [72] (see inbreeding avoidance).

Outcrossing as a way of avoiding inbreeding depression has been especially well studied in birds. For instance, inbreeding depression occurs in the great tit (Parus major) when the offspring are produced as a result of a mating between close relatives. In natural populations of the great tit, inbreeding is avoided by dispersal of individuals from their birthplace, which reduces the chance of mating with a close relative. [73]

Purple-crowned fairywren females paired with related males may undertake extra-pair matings that can reduce the negative effects of inbreeding, despite ecological and demographic constraints. [67]

Southern pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor) appear to avoid inbreeding in two ways: through dispersal and by avoiding familiar group members as mates. [74] Although both genders disperse locally, they move outside the range where genetically related individuals are likely to be encountered. Within their group, individuals only acquire breeding positions when the opposite-sex breeder is unrelated.

Cooperative breeding in birds typically occurs when offspring, usually males, delay dispersal from their natal group in order to remain with the family to help rear younger kin. [75] Female offspring rarely stay at home, dispersing over distances that allow them to breed independently or to join unrelated groups.


Parthenogenesis is a natural form of reproduction in which growth and development of embryos occur without fertilization.

Reproduction in squamate reptiles is ordinarily sexual, with males having a ZZ pair of sex determining chromosomes, and females a ZW pair. However, various species, including the Colombian Rainbow boa (Epicrates maurus), Agkistrodon contortrix (copperhead snake) and Agkistrodon piscivorus (cotton mouth snake) can also reproduce by facultative parthenogenesis—that is, they are capable of switching from a sexual mode of reproduction to an asexual mode—resulting in production of WW female progeny. [76] [77] The WW females are likely produced by terminal automixis.[ citation needed ]

Mole salamanders are an ancient (2.4–3.8 million year-old) unisexual vertebrate lineage. [78] In the polyploid unisexual mole salamander females, a premeiotic endomitotic event doubles the number of chromosomes. As a result, the mature eggs produced subsequent to the two meiotic divisions have the same ploidy as the somatic cells of the female salamander. Synapsis and recombination during meiotic prophase I in these unisexual females is thought to ordinarily occur between identical sister chromosomes and occasionally between homologous chromosomes. Thus little, if any, genetic variation is produced. Recombination between homeologous chromosomes occurs only rarely, if at all. [79] Since production of genetic variation is weak, at best, it is unlikely to provide a benefit sufficient to account for the long-term maintenance of meiosis in these organisms.[ citation needed ]


Two killifish species, the mangrove killifish (Kryptolebias marmoratus) and Kryptolebias hermaphroditus , are the only known vertebrates to self-fertilize. [80] They produce eggs and sperm by meiosis and routinely reproduce by self-fertilisation. This capacity has apparently persisted for at least several hundred thousand years. [81] Each individual hermaphrodite normally fertilizes itself through uniting inside the fish's body of an egg and a sperm that it has produced by an internal organ. [82] In nature, this mode of reproduction can yield highly homozygous lines composed of individuals so genetically uniform as to be, in effect, identical to one another. [83] [84] Although inbreeding, especially in the extreme form of self-fertilization, is ordinarily regarded as detrimental because it leads to expression of deleterious recessive alleles, self-fertilization does provide the benefit of fertilization assurance (reproductive assurance) at each generation. [83]

The Living Planet Index, following 16,704 populations of 4,005 species of vertebrates, shows a decline of 60% between 1970 and 2014. [85] Since 1970, freshwater species declined 83%, and tropical populations in South and Central America declined 89%. [86] The authors note that, "An average trend in population change is not an average of total numbers of animals lost." [86] According to WWF, this could lead to a sixth major extinction event. [87] The five main causes of biodiversity loss are land-use change, overexploitation of natural resources, climate change, pollution and invasive species. [88]

See also


  1. Tetrapoda are cladistically included within Sarcopterygii. [6]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chordate</span> Phylum of animals having a dorsal nerve cord

A chordate is a deuterostomic animal belonging to the phylum Chordata. All chordates possess, at some point during their larval or adult stages, five distinctive physical characteristics (synapomorphies) that distinguish them from other taxa. These five synapomorphies are a notochord, a hollow dorsal nerve cord, an endostyle or thyroid, pharyngeal slits, and a post-anal tail. The name "chordate" comes from the first of these synapomorphies, the notochord, which plays a significant role in chordate body plan structuring and movements. Chordates are also bilaterally symmetric, have a coelom, possess a closed circulatory system, and exhibit metameric segmentation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tetrapod</span> Superclass of the first four-limbed vertebrates and their descendants

A tetrapod is any four-limbed vertebrate animal of the superclass Tetrapoda. Tetrapods include all extant and extinct amphibians and amniotes, with the latter in turn evolving into two major clades, the sauropsids and synapsids. Some tetrapods such as snakes, legless lizards, and caecilians had evolved to become limbless via mutations of the Hox gene, although some do still have a pair of vestigial spurs that are remnants of the hindlimbs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hagfish</span> Family of eel-shaped, slime-producing animal

Hagfish, of the class Myxini and order Myxiniformes, are eel-shaped jawless fish. Hagfish are the only known living animals that have a skull but no vertebral column, although they do have rudimentary vertebrae. Hagfish are marine predators and scavengers who can defend themselves against other larger predators by releasing copious amounts of slime from mucous glands in their skin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agnatha</span> Infraphylum of jawless fish

Agnatha is an infraphylum of jawless fish in the phylum Chordata, subphylum Vertebrata, consisting of both living (cyclostomes) and extinct species. Among recent animals, cyclostomes are sister to all vertebrates with jaws, known as gnathostomes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gnathostomata</span> Infraphylum of vertebrates

Gnathostomata are the jawed vertebrates. Gnathostome diversity comprises roughly 60,000 species, which accounts for 99% of all living vertebrates, including humans. In addition to opposing jaws, living gnathostomes have true teeth, paired appendages, the elastomeric protein of elastin, and a horizontal semicircular canal of the inner ear, along with physiological and cellular anatomical characters such as the myelin sheaths of neurons, and an adaptive immune system that has the discrete lymphoid organs of spleen and thymus, and uses V(D)J recombination to create antigen recognition sites, rather than using genetic recombination in the variable lymphocyte receptor gene.

<i>Haikouichthys</i> Extinct genus of jawless fishes

Haikouichthys is an extinct genus of craniate that lived 518 million years ago, during the Cambrian explosion of multicellular life. Haikouichthys had a defined skull and other characteristics that have led paleontologists to label it a true craniate, and even to be popularly characterized as one of the earliest fishes. Cladistic analysis indicates that the animal is probably a basal chordate or a basal craniate; but it does not possess sufficient features to be included uncontroversially even in either stem group. It was formally described in 1999.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amniote</span> Clade of tetrapods including reptiles, birds and mammals

Amniotes are tetrapod vertebrate animals belonging to the clade Amniota, a large group that comprises the vast majority of living terrestrial and semiaquatic vertebrates. Amniotes evolved from amphibian ancestors during the Carboniferous period and further diverged into two groups, namely the sauropsids and synapsids. They are distinguished from the other living tetrapod clade — the non-amniote lissamphibians — by the development of three extraembryonic membranes, thicker and keratinized skin, and costal respiration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fish anatomy</span> Study of the form or morphology of fishes

Fish anatomy is the study of the form or morphology of fish. It can be contrasted with fish physiology, which is the study of how the component parts of fish function together in the living fish. In practice, fish anatomy and fish physiology complement each other, the former dealing with the structure of a fish, its organs or component parts and how they are put together, such as might be observed on the dissecting table or under the microscope, and the latter dealing with how those components function together in living fish.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Craniate</span> Clade of chordates, member of the Craniata

A craniate is a member of the Craniata, a proposed clade of chordate animals with a skull of hard bone or cartilage. Living representatives are the Myxini (hagfishes), Hyperoartia, and the much more numerous Gnathostomata. Formerly distinct from vertebrates by excluding hagfish, molecular and anatomical research in the 21st century has led to the reinclusion of hagfish as vertebrates, making living craniates synonymous with living vertebrates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tunicate</span> Marine animals, subphylum of chordates

A tunicate is a marine invertebrate animal, a member of the subphylum Tunicata. It is part of the Chordata, a phylum which includes all animals with dorsal nerve cords and notochords. The subphylum was at one time called Urochordata, and the term urochordates is still sometimes used for these animals. They are the only chordates that have lost their myomeric segmentation, with the possible exception of the 'seriation of the gill slits'. However, doliolids still display segmentation of the muscle bands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Notochord</span> Flexible rod-shaped structure in all chordates

In zoology and developmental anatomy, the notochord is an elastic, rod-like anatomical structure found in many deuterostomal animals. A notochord is one of five synapomorphies used to define a species as a chordate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lepospondyli</span> Polyphyletic group of tetrapodomorphs

Lepospondyli is a diverse taxon of early tetrapods. With the exception of one late-surviving lepospondyl from the Late Permian of Morocco, lepospondyls lived from the Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) to the Early Permian and were geographically restricted to what is now Europe and North America. Five major groups of lepospondyls are known: Adelospondyli; Aïstopoda; Lysorophia; Microsauria; and Nectridea. Lepospondyls have a diverse range of body forms and include species with newt-like, eel- or snake-like, and lizard-like forms. Various species were aquatic, semiaquatic, or terrestrial. None were large, and they are assumed to have lived in specialized ecological niches not taken by the more numerous temnospondyl amphibians that coexisted with them in the Paleozoic. Lepospondyli was named in 1888 by Karl Alfred von Zittel, who coined the name to include some tetrapods from the Paleozoic that shared some specific characteristics in the notochord and teeth. Lepospondyls have sometimes been considered to be either related or ancestral to modern amphibians or to Amniota. It has been suggested that the grouping is polyphyletic, with aïstopods being primitive stem-tetrapods, while recumbirostran microsaurs are primitive reptiles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cyclostomi</span> Superclass of jawless fishes

Cyclostomi, often referred to as Cyclostomata, is a group of vertebrates that comprises the living jawless fishes: the lampreys and hagfishes. Both groups have jawless mouths with horny epidermal structures that function as teeth called ceratodontes, and branchial arches that are internally positioned instead of external as in the related jawed fishes. The name Cyclostomi means "round mouths". It was named by Joan Crockford-Beattie.

Many vertebrates are limbless, limb-reduced, or apodous, with a body plan consisting of a head and vertebral column, but no adjoining limbs such as legs or fins. Jawless fish are limbless but may have preceded the evolution of vertebrate limbs, whereas numerous reptile and amphibian lineages – and some eels and eel-like fish – independently lost their limbs. Larval amphibians, tadpoles, are also often limbless. No mammals or birds are limbless, but some feature partial limb-loss or limb reduction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine vertebrate</span> Marine animals with a vertebrate column

Marine vertebrates are vertebrates that live in marine environments. These are the marine fish and the marine tetrapods. Vertebrates are a subphylum of chordates that have a vertebral column (backbone). The vertebral column provides the central support structure for an internal skeleton. The internal skeleton gives shape, support, and protection to the body and can provide a means of anchoring fins or limbs to the body. The vertebral column also serves to house and protect the spinal cord that lies within the column.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Branchial arch</span> Bony "loops" present in fish, which support the gills

Branchial arches, or gill arches, are a series of bony "loops" present in fish, which support the gills. As gills are the primitive condition of vertebrates, all vertebrate embryos develop pharyngeal arches, though the eventual fate of these arches varies between taxa. In jawed fish, the first arch develops into the jaws. The second gill arch develops into the hyomandibular complex, which supports the back of the jaw and the front of the gill series. The remaining posterior arches support the gills. In amphibians and reptiles, many elements are lost including the gill arches, resulting in only the oral jaws and a hyoid apparatus remaining. In mammals and birds, the hyoid is simplified further.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lamprey</span> Order of jawless fish

Lampreys are a group of jawless fish comprising the order Petromyzontiformes. The adult lamprey is characterized by a toothed, funnel-like sucking mouth. The common name "lamprey" is probably derived from Latin lampetra, which may mean "stone licker", though the etymology is uncertain. Lamprey is sometimes seen for the plural form.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of fish</span> Origin and diversification of fish through geologic time

The evolution of fish began about 530 million years ago during the Cambrian explosion. It was during this time that the early chordates developed the skull and the vertebral column, leading to the first craniates and vertebrates. The first fish lineages belong to the Agnatha, or jawless fish. Early examples include Haikouichthys. During the late Cambrian, eel-like jawless fish called the conodonts, and small mostly armoured fish known as ostracoderms, first appeared. Most jawless fish are now extinct; but the extant lampreys may approximate ancient pre-jawed fish. Lampreys belong to the Cyclostomata, which includes the extant hagfish, and this group may have split early on from other agnathans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fish gill</span> Organ that allows fish to breathe underwater

Fish gills are organs that allow fish to breathe underwater. Most fish exchange gases like oxygen and carbon dioxide using gills that are protected under gill covers (operculum) on both sides of the pharynx (throat). Gills are tissues that are like short threads, protein structures called filaments. These filaments have many functions including the transfer of ions and water, as well as the exchange of oxygen, carbon dioxide, acids and ammonia. Each filament contains a capillary network that provides a large surface area for exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of tetrapods</span> Evolution of four legged vertebrates and their derivatives

The evolution of tetrapods began about 400 million years ago in the Devonian Period with the earliest tetrapods evolved from lobe-finned fishes. Tetrapods are categorized as animals in the biological superclass Tetrapoda, which includes all living and extinct amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. While most species today are terrestrial, little evidence supports the idea that any of the earliest tetrapods could move about on land, as their limbs could not have held their midsections off the ground and the known trackways do not indicate they dragged their bellies around. Presumably, the tracks were made by animals walking along the bottoms of shallow bodies of water. The specific aquatic ancestors of the tetrapods, and the process by which land colonization occurred, remain unclear. They are areas of active research and debate among palaeontologists at present.


  1. 1 2 Yang, Chuan; Li, Xian-Hua; Zhu, Maoyan; Condon, Daniel J.; Chen, Junyuan (2018). "Geochronological constraint on the Cambrian Chengjiang biota, South China" (PDF). Journal of the Geological Society. 175 (4): 659–666. Bibcode:2018JGSoc.175..659Y. doi:10.1144/jgs2017-103. ISSN   0016-7649. S2CID   135091168. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
  2. 1 2 Nielsen, C. (July 2012). "The authorship of higher chordate taxa". Zoologica Scripta. 41 (4): 435–436. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.2012.00536.x. S2CID   83266247.
  3. "vertebrate". Unabridged (Online). n.d.
  4. "Vertebrata". Unabridged (Online). n.d.
  5. "Table 1a: Number of species evaluated in relation to the overall number of described species, and numbers of threatened species by major groups of organisms". IUCN Red List. 18 July 2019.
  6. Ahlberg, Per Erik (2021). "A comparative genomic framework for the fish-tetrapod transition". Science China Life Sciences. 64: 664–666. doi: 10.1007/s11427-021-1903-x .
  7. Ota, Kinya G.; Fujimoto, Satoko; Oisi, Yasuhiro; Kuratani, Shigeru (25 January 2017). "Identification of vertebra-like elements and their possible differentiation from sclerotomes in the hagfish". Nature Communications. 2: 373. Bibcode:2011NatCo...2..373O. doi:10.1038/ncomms1355. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   3157150 . PMID   21712821.
  8. Kuraku; et al. (December 1999). "Monophyly of Lampreys and Hagfishes Supported by Nuclear DNA–Coded Genes". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 49 (6): 729–35. Bibcode:1999JMolE..49..729K. doi:10.1007/PL00006595. PMID   10594174. S2CID   5613153.
  9. Stock, D.; Whitt, G. S. (7 August 1992). "Evidence from 18S ribosomal RNA sequences that lampreys and hagfish form a natural group". Science. 257 (5071): 787–789. Bibcode:1992Sci...257..787S. doi:10.1126/science.1496398. PMID   1496398.
  10. Nicholls, H. (10 September 2009). "Mouth to Mouth". Nature. 461 (7261): 164–166. doi: 10.1038/461164a . PMID   19741680.
  11. "vertebrate". Online Etymology Dictionary.
  12. "vertebra". Online Etymology Dictionary.
  13. Waggoner, Ben. "Vertebrates: More on Morphology". UCMP. Retrieved 13 July 2011.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Romer, A.S. (1949): The Vertebrate Body. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia. (2nd ed. 1955; 3rd ed. 1962; 4th ed. 1970)
  15. Liem, K. F.; Walker, W. F. (2001). Functional anatomy of the vertebrates: an evolutionary perspective. Harcourt College Publishers. p. 277. ISBN   978-0-03-022369-3.
  16. Scott, T. (1996). Concise encyclopedia biology . Walter de Gruyter. p.  542. ISBN   978-3-11-010661-9.
  17. Brazeau, Martin D.; Castiello, Marco; El Fassi El Fehri, Amin; Hamilton, Louis; Ivanov, Alexander O.; Johanson, Zerina; Friedman, Matt (20 November 2023). "Fossil evidence for a pharyngeal origin of the vertebrate pectoral girdle". Nature. 623 (7987): 550–554. Bibcode:2023Natur.623..550B. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06702-4 . hdl: 10044/1/107350 .
  18. Szarski, Henryk (1957). "The Origin of the Larva and Metamorphosis in Amphibia". The American Naturalist. 91 (860): 283–301. doi:10.1086/281990. JSTOR   2458911. S2CID   85231736.
  19. Clack, J. A. (2002): Gaining ground: the origin and evolution of tetrapods. Indiana University Press , Bloomington, Indiana. 369 pp
  20. Teng, Lu; Labosky, Patricia A. (2006). "Neural Crest Stem Cells". Neural Crest Induction and Differentiation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Vol. 589. pp. 206–212. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-46954-6_13. ISBN   978-0-387-35136-0. ISSN   0065-2598. PMID   17076284.
  21. Gans, C.; Northcutt, R. G. (1983). "Neural crest and the origin of vertebrates: a new head". Science. 220 (4594): 268–273. Bibcode:1983Sci...220..268G. doi:10.1126/science.220.4594.268. PMID   17732898. S2CID   39290007.
  22. Bronner, M. E.; LeDouarin, N. M. (1 June 2012). "Evolution and development of the neural crest: An overview". Developmental Biology. 366 (1): 2–9. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.12.042. PMC   3351559 . PMID   22230617.
  23. Dupin, E.; Creuzet, S.; Le Douarin, N.M. (2007) "The Contribution of the Neural Crest to the Vertebrate Body". In: Jean-Pierre Saint-Jeannet, Neural Crest Induction and Differentiation, pp. 96–119, Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN   9780387469546. doi : 10.1007/978-0-387-46954-6_6. Full text
  24. 1 2 Hildebrand, M.; Gonslow, G. (2001): Analysis of Vertebrate Structure. 5th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York
  25. "Keeping an eye on evolution". 3 December 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
  26. "Hyperotreti".
  27. 1 2 3 4 Gupta, Radhey S. (January 2016). "Molecular signatures that are distinctive characteristics of the vertebrates and chordates and supporting a grouping of vertebrates with the tunicates". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 94 (Pt A): 383–391. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.09.019. ISSN   1055-7903. PMID   26419477.
  28. Stach, Thomas (2008). "Chordate phylogeny and evolution: a not so simple three‐taxon problem". Journal of Zoology. 276 (2): 117–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00497.x .
  29. Delsuc, F (2006). "Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates" (PDF). Nature. 439 (7079): 965–968. Bibcode:2006Natur.439..965D. doi:10.1038/nature04336. PMID   16495997. S2CID   4382758. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
  30. Dunn, C.W. (2008). "Broad phylogenetic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life". Nature. 452 (7188): 745–749. Bibcode:2008Natur.452..745D. doi:10.1038/nature06614. PMID   18322464. S2CID   4397099.
  31. 1 2 Shu, D-G.; Luo, H-L.; Conway Morris, S.; Zhang, X-L.; Hu, S-X.; Chen, L.; Han, J.; Zhu, M.; Li, Y.; Chen, L-Z. (1999). "Lower Cambrian vertebrates from south China". Nature. 402 (6757): 42–46. Bibcode:1999Natur.402...42S. doi:10.1038/46965. ISSN   0028-0836. S2CID   4402854.
  32. Shu, D. (2003). "A paleontological perspective of vertebrate origin". Chinese Science Bulletin. 48 (8): 725–735. doi:10.1360/03wd0026.
  33. Chen, J.-Y.; Huang, D.-Y.; Li, C.-W. (1999). "An early Cambrian craniate-like chordate". Nature. 402 (6761): 518–522. Bibcode:1999Natur.402..518C. doi:10.1038/990080. S2CID   24895681.
  34. Waggoner, B. "Vertebrates: Fossil Record". UCMP. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 15 July 2011.
  35. Tim Haines, T.; Chambers, P. (2005). The Complete Guide to Prehistoric Life . Firefly Books.
  36. Donoghue, P. C. J.; Forey, P. L.; Aldridge, R. J. (May 2000). "Conodont affinity and chordate phylogeny". Biological Reviews. 75 (2): 191–251. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00045.x. PMID   10881388. S2CID   22803015.
  37. Encyclopædia Britannica: a new survey of universal knowledge, Volume 17. Encyclopædia Britannica. 1954. p. 107.
  38. Berg, L. R.; Solomon, E. P.; Martin, D. W. (2004). Biology. Cengage Learning. p. 599. ISBN   978-0-534-49276-2.
  39. Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L. (2005). Ecology and behaviour of Mesozoic reptiles . Springer. p.  6. ISBN   9783540224211.
  40. Pires, Mathias; Mankin, Brian; Silvestro, Daniele; Quental, Tiago (26 September 2018). "Diversification dynamics of mammalian clades during the K–Pg mass extinction". Biology Letters . 14 (9). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0458 . PMC   6170748 via Proceedings of the Royal Society.
  41. Lowery, Christopher; Fraass, Andrew (8 April 2019). "Morphospace expansion paces taxonomic diversification after end Cretaceous mass extinction". Nature Ecology & Evolution . 3 (6): 900–904. Bibcode:2019NatEE...3..900L. doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0835-0. hdl: 1983/fb08c3c1-c203-4780-bc90-5994ec1030ff . S2CID   102354122 via Nature.
  42. Andersen, N. M.; Weir, T. A. (2004). Australian water bugs: their biology and identification (Hemiptera-Heteroptera, Gerromorpha & Nepomorpha). Apollo Books. p. 38. ISBN   978-87-88757-78-1.
  43. Hildebran, M.; Gonslow, G. (2001): Analysis of Vertebrate Structure. 5th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, page 33: Comment: The problem of naming sister groups
  44. 1 2 Benton, M.J. (1 November 2004). Vertebrate Palaeontology (Third ed.). Blackwell Publishing. pp. 33, 455 pp. ISBN   978-0632056378. Archived from the original on 19 October 2008. Retrieved 16 March 2006.
  45. Irie, Naoki (26 December 2018). "The phylum Vertebrata: a case for zoological recognition". Zoological Letters. 4 Article Number 32: 32. doi: 10.1186/s40851-018-0114-y . PMC   6307173 . PMID   30607258.
  46. Janvier, P. 1997. Vertebrata. Animals with backbones. Version 1 January 1997 (under construction). in The Tree of Life Web Project,
  47. Delsuc, F.; Philippe, H.; Tsagkogeorga, G.; Simion, P. (April 2018). "A phylogenomic framework and timescale for comparative studies of tunicates". BMC Biology. 16 (1). Tilak, M. K.; Turon, X.; López-Legentil, S.; Piette, J.; Lemaire, P.; Douzery, E. J.: 39. doi: 10.1186/s12915-018-0499-2 . PMC   5899321 . PMID   29653534.
  48. Friedman, Matt; Sallan, Lauren Cole (June 2012). "Five hundred million years of extinczion and recovery: A Phanerozoic survey of large-scale diversity patterns in fishes". Palaeontology. 55 (4): 707–742. Bibcode:2012Palgy..55..707F. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01165.x . S2CID   59423401.
  49. Zhu, Min; Ahlberg, Per E.; Pan, Zhaohui; Zhu, Youan; Qiao, Tuo; Zhao, Wenjin; Jia, Liantao; Lu, Jing (21 October 2016). "A Silurian maxillate placoderm illuminates jaw evolution". Science. 354 (6310): 334–336. Bibcode:2016Sci...354..334Z. doi:10.1126/science.aah3764. PMID   27846567. S2CID   45922669.
  50. Zhu, Min; Yu, Xiaobo; Ahlberg, Per Erik; Choo, Brian; Lu, Jing; Qiao, Tuo; Qu, Qingming; Zhao, Wenjin; Jia, Liantao; Blom, Henning; Zhu, You’an (25 September 2013). "A Silurian placoderm with osteichthyan-like marginal jaw bones". Nature. 502 (7470): 188–193. Bibcode:2013Natur.502..188Z. doi:10.1038/nature12617. ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   24067611. S2CID   4462506.
  51. Closed Access logo transparent.svg Giles, Sam; Friedman, Matt; Brazeau, Martin D. (12 January 2015). "Osteichthyan-like cranial conditions in an Early Devonian stem gnathostome". Nature . 520 (7545): 82–85. Bibcode:2015Natur.520...82G. doi:10.1038/nature14065. ISSN   1476-4687. PMC   5536226 . PMID   25581798.
  52. Benton, Michael J. (2009). Vertebrate Palaeontology (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. p. 44. ISBN   978-1-4051-4449-0.
  53. Miyashita, Tetsuto; Coates, Michael I.; Farrar, Robert; Larson, Peter; Manning, Phillip L.; Wogelius, Roy A.; Edwards, Nicholas P.; Anné, Jennifer; Bergmann, Uwe; Palmer, A. Richard; Currie, Philip J. (5 February 2019). "Hagfish from the Cretaceous Tethys Sea and a reconciliation of the morphological–molecular conflict in early vertebrate phylogeny". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 116 (6): 2146–2151. Bibcode:2019PNAS..116.2146M. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814794116 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   6369785 . PMID   30670644.
  54. 1 2 3 4 The World Conservation Union. 2014. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2014.3. Summary Statistics for Globally Threatened Species. Table 1: Numbers of threatened species by major groups of organisms (1996–2014).
  55. Nelson, Joseph S. (2016). Fishes of the World. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN   978-1-118-34233-6.
  56. Charlesworth, D.; Willis, J.H. (November 2009). "The genetics of inbreeding depression". Nat. Rev. Genet. 10 (11): 783–796. doi:10.1038/nrg2664. PMID   19834483. S2CID   771357.
  57. Gallardo, J.A.; Neira, R. (July 2005). "Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression in cultured Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): aggressiveness, dominance and intraspecific competition". Heredity (Edinb). 95 (6): 449–56. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800741 . PMID   16189545.
  58. Ala-Honkola, O.; Uddström, A.; Pauli, B.D.; Lindström, K. (2009). "Strong inbreeding depression in male mating behaviour in a poeciliid fish". J. Evol. Biol. 22 (7): 1396–1406. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01765.x. PMID   19486236. S2CID   44317000.
  59. Bickley, L.K.; Brown, A.R.; Hosken, D.J.; Hamilton, P.B.; Le Page, G.; Paull, G.C.; Owen, S.F.; Tyler, C.R. (February 2013). "Interactive effects of inbreeding and endocrine disruption on reproduction in a model laboratory fish". Evolutionary Applications. 6 (2): 279–289. Bibcode:2013EvApp...6..279B. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00288.x. PMC   3689353 . PMID   23798977.
  60. Ralls, K.; Ballou, J. (1982). "Effect of inbreeding on juvenile mortality in some small mammal species". Lab Anim. 16 (2): 159–66. doi: 10.1258/002367782781110151 . PMID   7043080.
  61. Leroy, G. (August 2011). "Genetic diversity, inbreeding and breeding practices in dogs: results from pedigree analyses". Vet. J. 189 (2): 177–182. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.06.016. PMID   21737321.
  62. van der Beek, S.; Nielen, A.L.; Schukken, Y.H.; Brascamp, E.W. (1999). "Evaluation of genetic, common-litter, and within-litter effects on preweaning mortality in a birth cohort of puppies". Am. J. Vet. Res. 60 (9): 1106–10. PMID   10490080.
  63. Gresky, C.; Hamann, H.; Distl, O. (2005). "[Influence of inbreeding on litter size and the proportion of stillborn puppies in dachshunds]". Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. (in German). 118 (3–4): 134–9. PMID   15803761.
  64. Leroy, G.; Phocas, F.; Hedan, B.; Verrier, E.; Rognon, X. (2015). "Inbreeding impact on litter size and survival in selected canine breeds" (PDF). Vet. J. 203 (1): 74–8. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.11.008. PMID   25475165. S2CID   27631883. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
  65. Keller, L. F.; Grant, P.R.; Grant, B.R.; Petren, K. (2002). "Environmental conditions affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression in survival of Darwin's finches". Evolution. 56 (6): 1229–39. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01434.x. PMID   12144022. S2CID   16206523.
  66. Hemmings, N. L.; Slate, J.; Birkhead, T. R. (2012). "Inbreeding causes early death in a passerine bird". Nat Commun. 3: 863. Bibcode:2012NatCo...3..863H. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1870 . PMID   22643890.
  67. 1 2 Kingma, S. A.; Hall, M. L.; Peters, A. (2013). "Breeding synchronization facilitates extrapair mating for inbreeding avoidance". Behavioral Ecology. 24 (6): 1390–1397. doi: 10.1093/beheco/art078 . hdl: 10.1093/beheco/art078 .
  68. 1 2 Waldman, B.; Rice, J.E.; Honeycutt, R.L. (1992). "Kin recognition and incest avoidance in toads". Am. Zool. 32: 18–30. doi: 10.1093/icb/32.1.18 .
  69. 1 2 Fitzpatrick, J. L.; Evans, J. P. (2014). "Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance in guppies" (PDF). J. Evol. Biol. 27 (12): 2585–94. doi:10.1111/jeb.12545. PMID   25387854. S2CID   934203. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
  70. 1 2 Olsson, M.; Shine, R.; Madsen, T.; Gullberg, A. Tegelström H (1997). "Sperm choice by females". Trends Ecol. Evol. 12 (11): 445–6. doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)85751-5. PMID   21238151.
  71. Bernstein, H.; Byerly, H.C.; Hopf, F.A.; Michod, R.E. (1985). "Genetic damage, mutation, and the evolution of sex". Science. 229 (4719): 1277–81. Bibcode:1985Sci...229.1277B. doi:10.1126/science.3898363. PMID   3898363.
  72. Pusey, A.; Wolf, M. (1996). "Inbreeding avoidance in animals". Trends Ecol. Evol. 11 (5): 201–6. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)10028-8. PMID   21237809.
  73. Szulkin, M.; Sheldon, B. C. (2008). "Dispersal as a means of inbreeding avoidance in a wild bird population". Proc. Biol. Sci. 275 (1635): 703–11. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0989. PMC   2596843 . PMID   18211876.
  74. Nelson-Flower, M. J.; Hockey, P. A.; O'Ryan, C.; Ridley, A. R. (2012). "Inbreeding avoidance mechanisms: dispersal dynamics in cooperatively breeding southern pied babblers". J Anim Ecol. 81 (4): 876–83. Bibcode:2012JAnEc..81..876N. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01983.x . PMID   22471769.
  75. Riehl, C.; Stern, C. A. (2015). "How cooperatively breeding birds identify relatives and avoid incest: New insights into dispersal and kin recognition". BioEssays. 37 (12): 1303–8. doi:10.1002/bies.201500120. PMID   26577076. S2CID   205476732.
  76. Booth, W.; Smith, C. F.; Eskridge, P. H.; Hoss, S. K.; Mendelson, J. R.; Schuett, G. W. (2012). "Facultative parthenogenesis discovered in wild vertebrates". Biol. Lett. 8 (6): 983–5. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0666. PMC   3497136 . PMID   22977071.
  77. Booth, W.; Million, L.; Reynolds, R. G.; Burghardt, G. M.; Vargo, E. L.; Schal, C.; Tzika, A. C.; Schuett, G. W. (2011). "Consecutive virgin births in the new world boid snake, the Colombian rainbow Boa, Epicrates maurus". J. Hered. 102 (6): 759–63. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esr080 . PMID   21868391.
  78. Bogart, J.P.; Bi, K.; Fu, J.; Noble, D.W.; Niedzwiecki, J. (February 2007). "Unisexual salamanders (genus Ambystoma) present a new reproductive mode for eukaryotes". Genome. 50 (2): 119–36. doi:10.1139/g06-152. PMID   17546077.
  79. Bi, K.; Bogart, J. P. (April 2010). "Probing the meiotic mechanism of intergenomic exchanges by genomic in situ hybridization on lampbrush chromosomes of unisexual Ambystoma (Amphibia: Caudata)". Chromosome Res. 18 (3): 371–82. doi:10.1007/s10577-010-9121-3. PMID   20358399. S2CID   2015354.
  80. Kanamori, Akira; Sugita, Yosuke; Yuasa, Yasufumi; Suzuki, Takamasa; Kawamura, Kouichi; Uno, Yoshinobu; Kamimura, Katsuyasu; Matsuda, Yoichi; Wilson, Catherine A; Amores, Angel; Postlethwait, John H (1 April 2016). "A Genetic Map for the Only Self-Fertilizing Vertebrate". G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 6 (4): 1095–1106. doi:10.1534/g3.115.022699. ISSN   2160-1836. PMC   4825644 . PMID   26865699.
  81. Tatarenkov, A.; Lima, S. M.; Taylor, D. S.; Avise, J. C. (25 August 2009). "Long-term retention of self-fertilization in a fish clade". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (34): 14456–9. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10614456T. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907852106 . PMC   2732792 . PMID   19706532.
  82. Sakakura, Yoshitaka; Soyano, Kiyoshi; Noakes, David L. G.; Hagiwara, Atsushi (2006). "Gonadal morphology in the self-fertilizing mangrove killifish, Kryptolebias marmoratus". Ichthyological Research. 53 (4): 427–430. Bibcode:2006IchtR..53..427S. doi:10.1007/s10228-006-0362-2. hdl: 10069/35713 . S2CID   9474211.
  83. 1 2 Avise, J. C.; Tatarenkov, A. (13 November 2012). "Allard's argument versus Baker's contention for the adaptive significance of selfing in a hermaphroditic fish". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 (46): 18862–7. Bibcode:2012PNAS..10918862A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217202109 . PMC   3503157 . PMID   23112206.
  84. Earley, R. L.; Hanninen, A. F.; Fuller, A.; Garcia, M. J.; Lee, E. A. (2012). "Phenotypic plasticity and integration in the mangrove rivulus (Kryptolebias marmoratus): a prospectus". Integr. Comp. Biol. 52 (6): 814–27. doi:10.1093/icb/ics118. PMC   3501102 . PMID   22990587.
  85. "Living Planet Report 2018 | WWF". Retrieved 21 May 2020.
  86. 1 2 Grooten, M.; Almond, R. E. A. (2018). Living Planet Report – 2018: Aiming Higher (PDF). WWF--World Wide Fund for Nature. ISBN   978-2-940529-90-2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
  87. "WWF Finds Human Activity Is Decimating Wildlife Populations". Time. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
  88. IPBES (25 November 2019). S. Diaz; J. Settele; E.S. Brondízio; H.T. Ngo; M. Guèze; J. Agard; A. Arneth; P. Balvanera; K.A. Brauman; S.H.M. Butchart; K.M.A. Chan; L.A. Garibaldi; K. Ichii; J. Liu; S.M. Subramanian; G.F. Midgley; P. Miloslavich; Z. Molnár; D. Obura; A. Pfaff; S. Polasky; A. Purvis; J. Razzaque; B. Reyers; R. Roy Chowdhury; Y.J. Shin; I.J. Visseren-Hamakers; K.J. Willis; C.N. Zay (eds.). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bonn: IPBES Secretariat. pp. 1–56. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3553579.