Westminster | |
---|---|
Former borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
![]() Westminster in London 1868-85 | |
![]() Westminster in London 1885-1918 | |
1545–1918 | |
Seats | two to 1885, then one |
Created from | Middlesex |
Replaced by | Westminster Abbey (abolished 1950) Westminster St George's (also known as Westminster, St George's Hanover Square) (received Knightsbridge exclave) |
During its existence contributed to new seat(s) of: | Strand (abolished 1918) St George's, Hanover Square (abolished 1950) |
Westminster was a parliamentary constituency in the Parliament of England to 1707, the Parliament of Great Britain 1707–1800 and the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801. It returned two members to 1885 and one thereafter.
The constituency was first known to have been represented in Parliament in 1545 and continued to exist until the redistribution of seats in 1918. The constituency's most famous former representatives are John Stuart Mill and Charles James Fox. The most analogous contemporary constituency is Cities of London and Westminster.
1885-1918: The Westminster district, and Close of Collegiate Church of St. Peter. [1]
The constituency was formed in 1545 from part of the county constituency of Middlesex and returned two members of parliament until 1885.
The City of Westminster is a district of Inner London. Its southern boundary is on the north bank of the River Thames. It is today combined with Marylebone to the north. It is west of the diminutive City of London, fixed with four MPs in 1298, and the north part of Lambeth, created a broad constituency in 1832. It is south-west of Holborn and St. Pancras which in 1832 were both placed in a wider seat named Finsbury and to the east of Kensington and Chelsea which were dealt with similarly in a seat named Chelsea.
In the 1885 redistribution of seats the constituency (virtually identical to the Metropolitan Borough of Westminster which was created in 1900) was divided into three single-member seats. The south-eastern part, including the traditional heart of Westminster and such important centres of power as the Houses of Parliament and the seat of government in Whitehall, continued to be a constituency called Westminster. By official definition the areas retained were "the Westminster district and Close of the Collegiate Church of St Peter"; a seat named Strand was created in the north-east and a seat, St George's, Hanover Square, in the west.
In the 1918 redistribution the three seats were cut to two: Westminster St George's in the west and Westminster Abbey in the east, the latter wholly containing and slightly larger than the 1885–1918 Westminster seat (except for its Knightsbridge exclave which lay some way off in the west).
The Westminster constituency represented the centre of British government and had a large electorate so that it was independent of the control of a patron. Before the Reform Act 1832 the right to vote was held by the male inhabitants paying scot and lot (a kind of local property tax). The franchise was the largest of any borough in the kingdom, and only the county constituency of Yorkshire had more voters. Sedgwick estimated the electorate at about 8,000 in the first half of the eighteenth century. Namier and Brooke estimated that there were about 12,000 voters later in the century. The large size of the electorate made contested elections immensely expensive.
In the sixteenth century the Church officials associated with Westminster Abbey had a large influence in the area, but as the community became bigger that became less important. The Court (or His Majesty's Treasury) had some legitimate influence (by the standards of the age), because of the royal residences and government offices in the borough. The use of public funds to bribe the electorate was not unknown, during close elections (see the comments about the cost of the 1780 and 1784 contests below). Local landowners who were prepared to stir up ill-will by threatening to evict or raise the rents of tenants voting the wrong way, could also affect the result.
Unlawful means were sometimes used to make sure that the right candidates were elected. In 1722 the election of two Tories was declared void because of rioting which prevented some Whigs voting. In 1741 a Whig returning officer called upon the assistance of some troops to close the poll before the Tory candidates could catch up to the Whig votes.
The House of Commons declared the 1741 election void with the ringing resolution that "the presence of a regular body of armed soldiers at an election of members to sit in Parliament, is a high infringement of the liberties of the subject, a manifest violation of the freedom of election and an open defiance of the laws and constitution of this kingdom".
By the eighteenth century it was normal for the members to be Irish peers, the sons of peers or baronets, as it was thought appropriate for them to be of high social standing so as to be worthy to represent the seat.
The Treasury spent the enormous sums of more than £8,000 in 1780 and £9,000 in 1784, in unsuccessful attempts to defeat the opposition Whig leader Charles James Fox. So expensive were these contests that for the next general election in 1790, the government and opposition leaders reached a formal agreement for each to have one member returned unopposed. However, in the event a second Whig candidate did appear, but the Tory (the famous Admiral Lord Hood) and Fox were re-elected without too much difficulty.
The last MP for this constituency, William Burdett-Coutts, was connected with a family prominent in City of Westminster politics since the eighteenth century. He himself was born in the United States in 1851, his grandparents on both sides having been British subjects. After he married Baroness Burdett-Coutts in 1881 he changed his surname from Bartlett to Burdett-Coutts. He represented the area from 1885 until 1918 and continued to sit for the Abbey division until his death in 1921.
The English civil year started on 25 March until 1752 (Scotland having changed to 1 January in 1600). The years used in this article have been converted to the new style where necessary. Old style dates would be a year earlier than the new style for days between 1 January and 24 March. No attempt has been made to compensate for the eleven days which did not occur in September 1752 in both England and Scotland as well as other British controlled territories (when the day after 2 September was 14 September), so as to bring the British Empire fully in line with the Gregorian calendar.
Some of the members elected during this period have been identified. The year first given is for the initial meeting of the Parliament, with the month added where there was more than one Parliament in the year. If a second year is given this is a date of dissolution. Early Parliaments sometimes only existed for a few days or weeks, so dissolutions in the same year as the first meeting are not recorded in this list If a specific date of election is known this is recorded in italic brackets. The Roman numerals in brackets, following some names, are those used to distinguish different politicians of the same name in 'The House of Commons' 1509–1558 and 1558–1603.
Westminster was the constituency of fraudulent businessman Augustus Melmotte, who gained election as a Conservative, in Anthony Trollope's satirical novel, The Way We Live Now (published 1875).
In multi-member elections the bloc voting system was used. Voters could cast a vote for one or two candidates, as they chose. The leading candidates with the largest number of votes were elected.
In by-elections and all elections after 1885, to fill a single seat, the first past the post system applied.
After 1832, when registration of voters was introduced, a turnout figure is given for contested elections. In two-member elections, when the exact number of participating voters is unknown, this is calculated by dividing the number of votes by two. To the extent that electors did not use both their votes this will be an underestimate of turnout.
Where a party had more than one candidate in one or both of a pair of successive elections change is calculated for each individual candidate, otherwise change is based on the party vote. Change figures at by-elections are from the preceding general election or the last intervening by-election. Change figures at general elections are from the last general election.
Candidates for whom no party has been identified are classified as Non Partisan. The candidate might have been associated with a party or faction in Parliament or consider himself to belong to a particular political tradition. Political parties before the nineteenth century were not as cohesive or organised as they later became. Contemporary commentators (even the reputed leaders of parties or factions) in the eighteenth century did not necessarily agree who the party supporters were. The traditional parties, which had arisen in the late seventeenth century, became increasingly irrelevant to politics in the eighteenth century (particularly after 1760), although for some contests in some constituencies party labels were still used. It was only towards the end of the century that party labels began to acquire some meaning again, although this process was by no means complete for several more generations.
Sources: The results for elections before 1790 were taken from the History of Parliament Trust publications on the House of Commons. The results from 1790 until the 1832 general election are based on Stooks Smith and from 1832 onwards on Craig. Where Stooks Smith gives additional information to the other sources this is indicated in a note.
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Gilbert Gerard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Thomas Clarges | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Philip Warwick | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Richard Everard | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Thomas Clarges | Defeated | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Thomas Elliot | Defeated | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Stephen Fox | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | William Pulteney | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Philip Matthews | Defeated | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | William Waller | Defeated | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | William Pulteney | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Francis Wythens | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | William Waller | Defeated | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | John Cutler | Defeated | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Philip Matthews | Defeated | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | William Pulteney | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | William Waller | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Richard Tufton | Defeated | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Charles Bonython | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Michael Arnold | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Gilbert Gerard | Defeated | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | William Dolbern | Defeated | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Pulteney | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Philip Howard | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Roger Langley | Defeated | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Charles Bonython | Defeated | N/A | N/A | |
Radical | Philip Matthews | Defeated | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Walter Clarges | Defeated | N/A | N/A | |
Radical | James Dewey | Defeated | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Wortley-Montagu | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Thomas Crosse | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Archibald Hutcheson | 4,024 | 32.7 | N/A | |
Tory | John Cotton | 3,853 | 31.4 | N/A | |
Whig | William Lowndes | 2,215 | 18.0 | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Crosse | 2,197 | 17.9 | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Montagu | 4,835 | 30.9 | +30.9 | |
Whig | George Carpenter | 4,515 | 28.8 | +28.8 | |
Tory | John Cotton | 3,485 | 22.3 | −9.1 | |
Tory | Thomas Clarges | 2,827 | 18.1 | +18.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Cavendish | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | William Clayton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Wager | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | William Clayton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Wager | 3,686 | 27.0 | N/A | |
Whig | William Clayton | 3,533 | 25.8 | N/A | |
Tory | Edward Vernon | 3,290 | 24.1 | New | |
Tory | Charles Edwin | 3,161 | 23.1 | New |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | John Perceval | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Charles Edwin | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Granville Leveson-Gower, Viscount Trentham | 2,873 | 42.3 | N/A | |
Whig | Peter Warren | 2,858 | 42.1 | N/A | |
Tory | Thomas Clarges | 544 | 8.0 | N/A | |
Tory | Thomas Dyke | 514 | 7.6 | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Granville Leveson-Gower, Viscount Trentham | 4,811 | 50.8 | +8.5 | |
Tory | George Vandeput [15] | 4,654 | 49.2 | +49.2 | |
Majority | 157 | 1.6 | N/A | ||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Cornwallis | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Edward Cornwallis | 3,385 | 48.1 | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | John Crosse | 3,184 | 45.2 | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | James Oglethorpe | 261 | 3.7 | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Charles Sackville | 209 | 3.0 | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Edward Cornwallis | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | William Pulteney | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Edwin Sandys | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Hugh Percy | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Edwin Sandys | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Hugh Percy | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Robert Bernard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Government/Northite | Hugh Percy | 4,994 | 33.8 | N/A | |
Government/Northite | Thomas Pelham-Clinton | 4,774 | 32.3 | N/A | |
Radical | Hervey Redmond Morres | 2,531 | 17.1 | N/A | |
Radical | Charles Stanhope | 2,342 | 15.9 | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Humphrey Cotes | 130 | 0.9 | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Charles Stanhope | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George Capell-Coningsby | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | George Brydges Rodney | 4,994 | 35.6 | +35.6 | |
Whig | Charles James Fox | 4,878 | 34.8 | +34.8 | |
Tory | Thomas Pelham-Clinton | 4,157 | 29.6 | −2.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles James Fox | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Cecil Wray | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles James Fox | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Samuel Hood | 6,588 | 35.4 | +35.4 | |
Whig | Charles James Fox | 6,126 | 32.9 | −1.9 | |
Whig | Cecil Wray | 5,895 | 31.7 | +31.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Townshend | 6,392 | 53.4 | +53.4 | |
Tory | Samuel Hood | 5,569 | 46.6 | +11.2 | |
Majority | 823 | 6.9 | N/A | ||
Whig gain from Tory | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles James Fox | 3,516 | 41.8 | +8.9 | |
Tory | Samuel Hood | 3,217 | 38.2 | +2.8 | |
Whig | John Horne Tooke | 1,679 | 20.0 | +20.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles James Fox | 5,160 | 40.3 | −1.5 | |
Tory | Alan Gardner | 4,814 | 37.6 | −0.6 | |
Whig | John Horne Tooke | 2,819 | 22.0 | +2.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles James Fox | 2,671 | 39.3 | −1.0 | |
Tory | Alan Gardner | 2,431 | 35.8 | −1.9 | |
Radical | John Graham (Westminster candidate) | 1,693 | 24.9 | New | |
Majority | 4,124 | 10.9 | −4.7 | ||
Turnout | 6,795 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | ||||
Tory hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles James Fox | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hugh Percy | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Samuel Hood | 5,478 | 37.2 | +1.4 | |
Whig | Richard Brinsley Sheridan | 4,758 | 32.3 | −7.0 | |
Radical | James Paull | 4,481 | 30.5 | +5.6 | |
Majority | 277 | 1.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 14,717 | ||||
Tory hold | Swing | ||||
Whig gain from Radical | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Francis Burdett | 5,134 | 37.0 | +37.0 | |
Whig | Thomas Cochrane | 3,708 | 26.8 | +26.8 | |
Whig | Richard Brinsley Sheridan | 2,615 | 18.9 | −13.5 | |
Tory | John Elliot (Westminster candidate) | 2,137 | 15.4 | −21.8 | |
Radical | James Paull | 269 | 1.9 | −28.6 | |
Majority | 93 | 11.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 13,594 | ||||
Whig gain from Tory | Swing | ||||
Whig hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Francis Burdett | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Cochrane | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Thomas Cochrane | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Samuel Romilly | 5,339 | 34.3 | N/A | |
Whig | Francis Burdett | 5,238 | 33.7 | N/A | |
Tory | Murray Maxwell | 4,808 | 30.9 | New | |
Radical | Henry Hunt | 84 | 0.5 | N/A | |
Whig | Douglas Kinnaird | 65 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Radical | John Cartwright | 23 | 0.2 | N/A | |
Majority | 430 | 2.8 | −8.6 | ||
Turnout | 15,557 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | ||||
Whig hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | George Lamb | 4,465 | 53.38 | +22.47 | |
Whig | John Hobhouse | 3,861 | 46.2 | +46.2 | |
Radical | John Cartwright | 38 | 0.5 | +0.3 | |
Majority | 604 | 7.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,364 | ||||
Tory gain from Whig | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Francis Burdett | 5,327 | 36.4 | +2.7 | |
Whig | John Hobhouse | 4,882 | 33.3 | +33.3 | |
Tory | George Lamb | 4,436 | 30.3 | −0.6 | |
Majority | 446 | 3.0 | +0.2 | ||
Turnout | 14,645 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | ||||
Whig hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Francis Burdett | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | John Hobhouse | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Francis Burdett | Unopposed | |||
Radical | John Hobhouse | Unopposed | |||
Radical hold | |||||
Radical hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Francis Burdett | Unopposed | |||
Radical | John Hobhouse | Unopposed | |||
Radical hold | |||||
Radical hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | John Hobhouse | Unopposed | |||
Radical hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Francis Burdett | 3,248 | 43.1 | N/A | |
Radical | John Hobhouse | 3,214 | 42.6 | N/A | |
Radical | De Lacy Evans | 1,076 | 14.3 | N/A | |
Majority | 2,138 | 28.3 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 4,453 | 38.5 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 11,576 | ||||
Radical hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Radical hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | John Hobhouse | Unopposed | |||
Radical hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | De Lacy Evans | 2,027 | 44.1 | +29.8 | |
Radical | John Hobhouse | 1,835 | 39.9 | −2.7 | |
Tory | Bickham Escott | 738 | 16.0 | New | |
Majority | 1,097 | 23.8 | −4.5 | ||
Turnout | 4,600 | 39.7 | +1.2 | ||
Registered electors | 11,576 | ||||
Radical hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Francis Burdett | 2,747 | 40.0 | −3.1 | |
Radical | De Lacy Evans | 2,588 | 37.7 | +23.4 | |
Conservative | Thomas John Cochrane | 1,528 | 22.3 | N/A | |
Majority | 1,060 | 15.4 | −12.9 | ||
Turnout | 4,254 | 32.1 | −6.4 | ||
Registered electors | 13,268 | ||||
Radical hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Radical hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Francis Burdett | 3,567 | 53.9 | +31.6 | |
Radical | John Temple Leader | 3,052 | 46.1 | −31.6 | |
Majority | 515 | 7.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 6,619 | 43.4 | +11.3 | ||
Registered electors | 15,262 | ||||
Conservative gain from Radical | Swing | +31.6 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | John Temple Leader | 3,793 | 37.5 | −2.5 | |
Radical | De Lacy Evans | 3,715 | 36.7 | −1.0 | |
Conservative | George Murray | 2,620 | 25.9 | +3.6 | |
Majority | 1,095 | 10.8 | −4.6 | ||
Turnout | 6,350 | 41.6 | +9.5 | ||
Registered electors | 15,262 | ||||
Radical hold | Swing | −2.2 | |||
Radical hold | Swing | −1.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry John Rous | 3,338 | 33.8 | +7.9 | |
Radical | John Temple Leader | 3,281 | 33.2 | −4.3 | |
Radical | De Lacy Evans | 3,258 | 33.0 | −3.7 | |
Majority | 57 | 0.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 6,596 | 47.9 | +6.3 | ||
Registered electors | 13,767 | ||||
Conservative gain from Radical | Swing | +7.9 | |||
Radical hold | Swing | −4.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | De Lacy Evans | 3,843 | 56.9 | −10.7 | |
Conservative | Henry John Rous | 2,906 | 43.1 | +10.6 | |
Majority | 937 | 13.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 6,749 | 45.6 | −2.3 | ||
Registered electors | 14,801 | ||||
Radical gain from Conservative | Swing | −10.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | De Lacy Evans | 3,139 | 29.1 | −38.5 | |
Whig | Charles Lushington | 2,831 | 26.3 | N/A | |
Whig | Charles Cochrane | 2,819 | 26.2 | N/A | |
Conservative | William Montagu | 1,985 | 18.4 | −16.1 | |
Turnout | 7,185 | 49.3 | +1.4 | ||
Registered electors | 14,572 | ||||
Majority | 308 | 2.9 | N/A | ||
Radical hold | Swing | ||||
Majority | 846 | 7.9 | N/A | ||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Shelley | 4,199 | 32.2 | −20.3 | |
Radical | De Lacy Evans | 3,756 | 28.8 | −0.3 | |
Conservative | William Montagu | 3,373 | 25.9 | +7.5 | |
Radical | William Coningham [11] | 1,716 | 13.2 | N/A | |
Turnout | 6,522 (est) | 43.8 (est) | −5.5 | ||
Registered electors | 14,883 | ||||
Majority | 443 | 3.4 | −4.5 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −10.0 | |||
Majority | 383 | 2.9 | — | ||
Radical hold | Swing | −3.9 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | De Lacy Evans | Unopposed | |||
Whig | John Shelley | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 13,182 | ||||
Radical hold | |||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | De Lacy Evans | Unopposed | |||
Liberal | John Shelley | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 13,801 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert Grosvenor | 4,534 | 35.2 | N/A | |
Liberal | John Stuart Mill | 4,525 | 35.1 | N/A | |
Liberal-Conservative | William Henry Smith | 3,824 | 29.7 | New | |
Majority | 701 | 5.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,354 (est) | 66.6 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 12,546 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Henry Smith | 7,648 | 37.3 | +7.6 | |
Liberal | Robert Grosvenor | 6,584 | 32.1 | −3.1 | |
Liberal | John Stuart Mill | 6,284 | 30.6 | −4.5 | |
Majority | 1,064 | 5.7 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 14,082 (est) | 74.6 (est) | +8.0 | ||
Registered electors | 18,879 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +7.6 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −3.5 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Henry Smith | 9,371 | 35.7 | +17.0 | |
Conservative | Charles Russell | 8,681 | 33.1 | +14.4 | |
Liberal | Thomas Buxton | 4,749 | 18.1 | −14.0 | |
Liberal | William Codrington | 3,435 | 13.1 | −17.5 | |
Majority | 3,932 | 15.0 | +9.3 | ||
Turnout | 13,118 (est) | 66.1 (est) | −8.5 | ||
Registered electors | 19,845 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +16.4 | |||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +15.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Henry Smith | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Henry Smith | 9,093 | 29.3 | −6.4 | |
Conservative | Charles Russell | 8,930 | 28.8 | −4.3 | |
Liberal | John Morley | 6,564 | 21.2 | +3.1 | |
Liberal | Arthur Hobhouse | 6,443 | 20.8 | +7.7 | |
Majority | 2,366 | 7.6 | −7.4 | ||
Turnout | 15,515 (est) | 73.6 (est) | +7.5 | ||
Registered electors | 21,081 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −4.8 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | −6.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Algernon Percy | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Henry Smith | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Decades: |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Burdett-Coutts | 3,991 | 69.7 | +11.6 | |
Liberal | Edward Spencer Beesly | 1,736 | 30.3 | −11.7 | |
Majority | 2,255 | 39.4 | +31.8 | ||
Turnout | 5,727 | 74.7 | +1.1 (est) | ||
Registered electors | 7,670 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +11.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Burdett-Coutts | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Burdett-Coutts | 3,548 | 64.9 | N/A | |
Liberal | Leif Jones | 1,916 | 35.1 | New | |
Majority | 1,632 | 29.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 5,464 | 68.5 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 7,971 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Burdett-Coutts | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Burdett-Coutts | 2,715 | 86.1 | N/A | |
Ind. Conservative | H.H. Montague-Smith | 439 | 13.9 | New | |
Majority | 2,276 | 72.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 3,154 | 42.8 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 7,367 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Burdett-Coutts | 3,167 | 60.7 | −25.4 | |
Liberal | Vere Hobart | 2,054 | 39.3 | New | |
Majority | 1,113 | 21.4 | −50.8 | ||
Turnout | 5,221 | 69.3 | +26.5 | ||
Registered electors | 7,539 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Burdett-Coutts | 3,917 | 69.1 | +8.4 | |
Liberal | Vere Hobart | 1,751 | 30.9 | −8.4 | |
Majority | 2,166 | 38.2 | +16.8 | ||
Turnout | 7,284 | 77.8 | +8.5 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +8.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Burdett-Coutts | 3,397 | 73.4 | +4.3 | |
Liberal | Harry de Pass | 1,228 | 26.6 | −4.3 | |
Majority | 2,169 | 46.8 | +8.6 | ||
Turnout | 7,284 | 63.5 | −14.3 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +4.3 |
Windsor (/ˈwɪnzə/) is a constituency of the House of Commons in the UK Parliament represented since 2024 by Jack Rankin of the Conservative Party. It was re-created for the 1997 general election after it was abolished following the 1970 general election and replaced by the Windsor and Maidenhead constituency.
Inverness Burghs was a district of burghs constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1708 to 1801 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1918. It elected one Member of Parliament (MP).
Inverness-shire was a county constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1708 to 1801 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 until 1918.
Cambridge University was a university constituency electing two members to the British House of Commons, from 1603 to 1950.
Oxford University was a university constituency electing two members to the British House of Commons, from 1603 to 1950. The last two members to represent Oxford University when it was abolished were A. P. Herbert and Arthur Salter.
Tain Burghs was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1708 to 1801 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1832, sometimes known as Northern Burghs. It was represented by one Member of Parliament (MP).
Berkshire was a parliamentary constituency in England, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of England until 1707, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1885. The county returned two knights of the shire until 1832 and three between 1832 and 1885.
Buckinghamshire is a former United Kingdom Parliamentary constituency. It was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1885.
Cornwall is a former county constituency covering the county of Cornwall, in the South West of England. It was a constituency of the House of Commons of England then of the House of Commons of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1832. It was represented by two Knights of the Shire, elected by the bloc vote system.
Middlesex was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800, then of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 until abolished in 1885. It returned two members per election by various voting systems including hustings.
The City of London was a United Kingdom parliamentary constituency. It was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1950.
Wallingford was a parliamentary constituency in England, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of England until 1707, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1885.
Bristol was a two-member constituency, used to elect members to the House of Commons in the Parliaments of England, Great Britain (1707–1800), and the United Kingdom. The constituency existed until Bristol was divided into single member constituencies in 1885.
Portsmouth was a borough constituency based upon the borough of Portsmouth in Hampshire. It returned two members of parliament (MPs) to the Parliaments of England, Great Britain and from 1801 the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, elected by the bloc vote system.
Liskeard was a parliamentary borough in Cornwall, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1295 until 1832, and then one member from 1832 until 1885. The constituency was abolished by the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885.
Nottinghamshire was a county constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1832. It was represented by two Members of Parliament (MPs), traditionally known as Knights of the Shire.
Oxfordshire was a county constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1885. It was represented by two Members of Parliament. In 1832 this was increased to three Members of Parliament. The constituency was abolished in 1885, being split into three single member divisions.
Stamford was a constituency in the county of Lincolnshire of the House of Commons for the Parliament of England to 1706 then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1918. It was represented by two Members of Parliament until 1868 when this was reduced to one.
Norfolk was a County constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England from 1290 to 1707, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1832. It was represented by two Members of Parliament. In 1832 the county was divided for parliamentary purposes into two new two member divisions – East Norfolk and West Norfolk.
Flint Boroughs was a parliamentary constituency in north-east Wales which returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom and its predecessors, from 1542 until it was abolished for the 1918 general election.