Zeppelin-Staaken VGO.I

Last updated

VGO.I
Zeppelin-Staaken VGO-I.jpg
RoleHeavy bomber
National originGermany
Manufacturer Zeppelin-Staaken
First flight11 April 1915
Primary user Imperial German Navy
Number built1
Developed into Zeppelin-Staaken VGO.II
Zeppelin-Staaken VGO.III

The Zeppelin-Staaken VGO.I, redesignated Zeppelin-Staaken RML.1 in naval service, was a heavy bomber built in Germany in 1915 and which saw limited service during World War I. [1] Although only one example was built, it served as a prototype for further Riesenflugzeuge ("giant aircraft") by Zeppelin-Staaken. [1] Its "VGO" designation was assigned because the aircraft was constructed by Versuchsbau Gotha-Ost, [1] a division of Gothaer Waggonfabrik. At the time of its constuction, it was the largest plane in the world. [2]

Contents

Design

The VGO.I was a four-bay, equal-span biplane with slightly negative wing stagger. [3] Of mostly conventional configuration it diverged most noticeably from the designs of the day not only by its size, but by its biplane horizontal stabilisers, its two fins, and its tricycle undercarriage. Its two pilots sat in an open cockpit, [4] and the crew also included a mechanic for each of its three engines, [4] and two machine-gunners. One engine was mounted in the nose, driving a tractor propeller, and the other two were mounted in nacelles in the interplane gap and drove pusher propellers. [3] These nacelles were large enough to accommodate a mechanic, who could make his way into them in flight (a requirement of the Riesenflugzeuge specification). The fuselage included a bomb bay large enough to carry a 1,000-kilogram (2,200 lb) bomb. [3] As defensive armament, the VGO.I carried two machine guns in the fuselage, one firing upward and the other downward. Later, machine guns would also be fitted to the fronts of the engine nacelles. [5]

The design proved very underpowered, and two more engines were eventually added, one to each nacelle. [6] The two engines in each nacelle were geared together to drive a common propeller. [7]

The structure was a mixture of wood and welded steel tube, covered in canvas. [3] Late in its service life, some of the canvas covering was replaced by cellon to help reduce the aircraft's visibility. [7]

Development

Around the outbreak of World War I, Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin became interested in the potential of a very large aeroplane to overcome the operational limitations of the airships for which he and his company were famous. [8] He was aware of a pre-war project by Hellmuth Hirth and Gustav Klein to build a giant biplane with transatlantic range, and recruited them to work on building an aircraft that could carry a 1,000-kilogram (2,200 lb) bomb over a range of 600 kilometres (370 mi). [8] With Robert Bosch, Zeppelin financed the Versuchsbau Gotha-Ost venture, and appointed Professor Alexander Baumann to lead the project. [9] From the outset, this was a private venture, but Zeppelin soon secured the interest and support of both the Army and the Navy. [10] At the same time the War Office opposed the project. [10]

Design work began in September 1914 and was complete by December. [10] Construction was delayed in January 1915 because the Maybach HS engines were not yet ready. [10] The aircraft first flew on 11 April 1915 [4] and on 6 June was flown to the Maybach factory in Friedrichshafen for testing by the Imperial German Navy. [5] The HS engine was a new design, and its unreliability proved a constant problem, culminating in a forced landing at Geroldsgrün after two of the three engines failed in flight. [5] The heavily damaged aircraft was salvaged and taken back to Gotha. [5]

The VGO.I was rebuilt with many modifications. [5] These included redesigned engine nacelles that incorporated a gunner's position in their fronts, [5] and a redesigned and enlarged tail to improve directional control. [11] Both were changes that had already been incorporated into the VGO.II design. [12] Improved cooling for the still-troublesome HS engines was also provided. [11] In this new form, it flew again on 16 February 1916 and was accepted for naval service by June. [11]

Operational history

The VGO.1 received the designation RML.1, for Reichs Marine Landflugzeuge (Imperial Navy landplane) and a unit, Kommando RLM.1, was established to test it in combat on the Eastern front. [11] The RML.1 was deployed to Auce in June 1916, but due to a series of engine and undercarriage failures, did not reach there until the end of July. [11] In mid August, the RML.1 flew a series of raids. [13] On 15 August, it attacked the railway terminal at Sloka. [13] The next day, it attacked the Russian air station at Läbara, and the day after that, the air station at Ruhnu Island and a troop encampment at Kemeri. [13] A second raid on Kemeri was to take place on 24 August but was aborted due to an overheating engine. [13]

On 1 September, two engines failed in quick succession while the RML.1 was outbound on a night raid. [13] The pilots guided it to a forced landing in a pine forest. [13] The fuselage was salvaged and sent back to Staaken, but Kommando RML.1 was disestablished, and its personnel reassigned. [6] The aircraft itself was rebuilt again, with new wings and engines. [6] This time, five Maybach Mb.IVa engines were installed, each with a similar power output to the original HS engines. [6] One engine was installed in the nose, as before, but the other four were installed two to each nacelle, geared together to drive a common propeller. [14] During this rebuild, some of the fuselage covering was replaced with cellon, [7] as part of a Unsichtbare Flugzeug (invisible aircraft) test, intended to reduce the visibilty of large aircraft. [7] A completely new tail was built, and this was also covered in cellon. [7]

The newly rebuilt VGO.I flew on 10 March 1917, but suffered an engine failure in the port nacelle. [7] As its pilots brought it back to the airfield, they needed to use hard rudder to balance the assymetrical thrust. [7] Unfortunately, a problem with the rudder pedals jamming at high deflections that had been noted in ground tests had not yet been corrected. [7] As a result, once on the ground and with its rudders jammed, the VGO.I could not be steered, and collided with the side of a hangar. [7] One pilot was killed instantly, and the other died a few hours later. [7] The VGO.I was not rebuilt again. [7]

Operators

Imperial German Navy
Kommando RML.1

Specifications (after first rebuild)

Data from Kroschel & Stützer 1994, p.133, and as noted

General characteristics

Performance

Armament

Notes

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeppelin-Staaken R.VI</span> Heavy bomber aircraft model

The Zeppelin-Staaken R.VI was a four-engined German biplane strategic bomber of World War I, and the only Riesenflugzeug design built in any quantity.

<i>Riesenflugzeug</i> Imperial German bomber class; largest warplanes of World War I

A Riesenflugzeug, sometimes colloquially referred to in English as an R-plane, was any member of a class of large World War I German bombers, possessing at least three aircraft engines, although usually four or more engines. These large multi-engine aircraft could fly several hours with larger bomb loads than the smaller Grossflugzeug bombers such as the Gotha G.V.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gotha WD.27</span> Type of aircraft

The Gotha WD.27 was a long-range maritime patrol floatplane developed during World War I by Gothaer Waggonfabrik (Gotha) for the Imperial German Navy's Naval Air Service. It was a large, four-engine aircraft with the same general layout as the WD.22; a conventional floatplane with engines grouped in tractor-pusher pairs on the lower wings. Three aircraft were ordered in early 1918, but the first prototype was not completed until after the end of the war in November. It may not have flown before it was ordered to be destroyed by the victorious Allies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeppelin-Staaken</span> Former German aircraft manufacturer

Zeppelin-Staaken, was a German aircraft manufacturer originally named Versuchsbau G.m.b.H. Gotha-Ost when it was formed in mid-1914 by Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin and Robert Bosch. The company rented facilities in Gotha with the objective to build large, long-range bomber aircraft. Alexander Baumann was hired by Zeppelin as the head designer. The company moved to the village of Staaken, near Berlin, in mid-1916 and was renamed Flugzeugwerft G.m.b.H., although it was commonly known as Zeppelin-Staaken.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeppelin-Lindau Rs.I</span> Type of aircraft

The Zeppelin-Lindau Rs.I was a large three-engined biplane flying boat designed by Claudius Dornier and built during 1914–15 on the German side of Lake Constance. It was destroyed in a storm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siemens-Schuckert R.II</span> Type of aircraft

The Siemens-Schuckert R.II was a prototype bomber aircraft built in Germany during World War I. It was one of six aircraft based on the Siemens-Schuckert R.I that were originally intended to be identical, but which each developed in a different direction and were designated as different aircraft types by the German Inspectorate of Flying Troops. Although the R.II was the first of the batch to be completed, it was the last accepted into military service, and then only as a trainer.

The Siemens-Schuckert R.IV was a bomber aircraft built in Germany during World War I. It was one of six aircraft based on the Siemens-Schuckert R.I that were originally intended to be identical, but which each developed in a different direction and were designated as different aircraft types by the German Inspectorate of Flying Troops. The Maybach HS engines specified by the Idflieg proved unreliable, but with these engines were replaced by Benz Bz.IV engines, the R.IV saw service on the Eastern Front before being relegated to training duties.

The Siemens-Schuckert R.V was a bomber aircraft built in Germany during World War I. It was one of six aircraft based on the Siemens-Schuckert R.I that were originally intended to be identical, but which each developed in a different direction and were designated as different aircraft types by the German Inspectorate of Flying Troops. Development of the R.V benefited from the experience that Siemens-Schuckert and the Idflieg had gained with the R.II, R.III, and R.IV, particularly in its choice of powerplants, where the R.V was spared from the troublesome Maybach HS engine. Between September 1916 and February 1917, the aircraft saw service on the Eastern Front before it was damaged in an accident and dismantled for spare parts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siemens-Schuckert R.VII</span> Type of aircraft

The Siemens-Schuckert R.VII was a bomber aircraft built in Germany during World War I. It was one of six aircraft based on the Siemens-Schuckert R.I that were originally intended to be identical, but which each developed in a different direction and were designated as different aircraft types by the German Inspectorate of Flying Troops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeppelin-Staaken R.XVI</span> Type of aircraft

The Zeppelin-Staaken R.XVI(Av) was a very large bomber (Riesenflugzeug), designed and built in Germany during 1918.

The Zeppelin-Staaken R.XV was an Imperial German bomber of World War I. An incremental improvement to the Zeppelin-Staaken R.VI, this was one of a series of large strategic bombers called Riesenflugzeuge, intended to be less vulnerable than dirigibles in use at the time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeppelin-Staaken R.XIV</span> Type of aircraft

The Zeppelin-Staaken R.XIV was a development of the Zeppelin-Staaken R.VI. This was one of a series of large bombers called Riesenflugzeuge, intended to be less vulnerable than the dirigibles in use at the time.

The Zeppelin-Staaken R.VII was six-engined large bomber - a Riesenflugzeug - of Imperial Germany, intended to be less vulnerable than the airships in use at the time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeppelin-Staaken R.V</span> Type of aircraft

The Zeppelin-Staaken R.V was one of a series of large bombers called Riesenflugzeugen, intended to be less vulnerable than the rigid airships in use at the time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeppelin-Staaken Riesenflugzeuge</span> Type of aircraft

The Zeppelin-Staaken Riesenflugzeuge were a series of very large bomber aircraft - Riesenflugzeuge, usually powered by four or more engines, designed and built in Germany from 1915 to 1919.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maybach Mb.IV</span>

The Maybach Mb.IV, originally designated Maybach HS,, was a six cylinder in-line piston engine of 250 hp (190 kW) output, originally developed for use in airships. It was also used for large aircraft such as the Zeppelin-Lindau Rs.I giant seaplane.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeppelin-Lindau Rs.II</span> Type of aircraft

The Zeppelin-Lindau Rs.II was a biplane flying boat, designed by Claudius Dornier as a follow-on to his Zeppelin-Lindau Rs.I and built during 1914–1915 on the German side of Lake Constance. Initially this aircraft was powered by three engines mounted inside the hull driving three pusher propellers via gearboxes and shafts. The later version was powered by four engines in two push-pull nacelles mounted between the wings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeppelin-Lindau Rs.III</span> Flying boat

The Zeppelin-Lindau Rs.III was a large four-engined monoplane flying boat designed by Claudius Dornier and built during 1917 on the German side of Lake Constance at the Zeppelin-Lindau works.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeppelin-Staaken L</span> Type of aircraft

The Zeppelin-Staaken L was an experimental long-range maritime patrol floatplane developed during World War I by Zeppelin-Staaken for the Imperial German Navy's Naval Air Service. Derived from the Zeppelin-Staaken R.VI heavy bomber, it was a large, four-engine aircraft with a crew of seven men. Its engines were grouped in tractor-pusher pairs between the wings. A single aircraft was ordered for evaluation purposes in 1917. It was destroyed in a crash in June 1918 with the death of everyone aboard.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Gray & Thetford 1992, p.582
  2. Szigeti 2007, p.12
  3. 1 2 3 4 Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.213
  4. 1 2 3 Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.212
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.214
  6. 1 2 3 4 Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.217
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.218
  8. 1 2 Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.209
  9. Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.210–11
  10. 1 2 3 4 Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.211
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.215
  12. Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.214–15
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.216
  14. Haddow & Grosz 1988, p.217–18
  15. Cooksley 2000, p.42

Bibliography