A¹ homotopy theory

Last updated

In algebraic geometry and algebraic topology, branches of mathematics, A1homotopy theory or motivic homotopy theory is a way to apply the techniques of algebraic topology, specifically homotopy, to algebraic varieties and, more generally, to schemes. The theory is due to Fabien Morel and Vladimir Voevodsky. The underlying idea is that it should be possible to develop a purely algebraic approach to homotopy theory by replacing the unit interval [0, 1], which is not an algebraic variety, with the affine line A1, which is. The theory has seen spectacular applications such as Voevodsky's construction of the derived category of mixed motives and the proof of the Milnor and Bloch-Kato conjectures.

Contents

Construction

A1 homotopy theory is founded on a category called the A1 homotopy category . Simply put, the A1 homotopy category, or rather the canonical functor , is the universal functor from the category of smooth -schemes towards an infinity category which satisfies Nisnevich descent, such that the affine line A1 becomes contractible. Here is some prechosen base scheme (e.g., the spectrum of the complex numbers ).

This definition in terms of a universal property is not possible without infinity categories. These were not available in the 90's and the original definition passes by way of Quillen's theory of model categories. Another way of seeing the situation is that Morel-Voevodsky's original definition produces a concrete model for (the homotopy category of) the infinity category .

This more concrete construction is sketched below.

Step 0

Choose a base scheme . Classically, is asked to be Noetherian, but many modern authors such as Marc Hoyois work with quasi-compact quasi-separated base schemes. In any case, many important results are only known over a perfect base field, such as the complex numbers, it's perfectly fine to consider only this case.

Step 1

Step 1a: Nisnevich sheaves. Classically, the construction begins with the category of Nisnevich sheaves on the category of smooth schemes over . Heuristically, this should be considered as (and in a precise technical sense is) the universal enlargement of obtained by adjoining all colimits and forcing Nisnevich descent to be satisfied.

Step 1b: simplicial sheaves. In order to more easily perform standard homotopy theoretic procedures such as homotopy colimits and homotopy limits, replaced with the following category of simplicial sheaves.

Let Δ be the simplex category, that is, the category whose objects are the sets

{0}, {0, 1}, {0, 1, 2}, ...,

and whose morphisms are order-preserving functions. We let denote the category of functors . That is, is the category of simplicial objects on . Such an object is also called a simplicial sheaf on .

Step 1c: fibre functors. For any smooth -scheme , any point , and any sheaf , let's write for the stalk of the restriction of to the small Nisnevich site of . Explicitly, where the colimit is over factorisations of the canonical inclusion via an étale morphism . The collection is a conservative family of fibre functors for .

Step 1d: the closed model structure. We will define a closed model structure on in terms of fibre functors. Let be a morphism of simplicial sheaves. We say that:

The homotopy category of this model structure is denoted .

Step 2

This model structure has Nisnevich descent, but it does not contract the affine line. A simplicial sheaf is called -local if for any simplicial sheaf the map

induced by is a bijection. Here we are considering as a sheaf via the Yoneda embedding, and the constant simplicial object functor .

A morphism is an -weak equivalence if for any -local , the induced map

is a bijection. The -local model structure is the localisation of the above model with respect to -weak equivalences.

Formal Definition

Finally we may define the A1 homotopy category.

Definition. Let S be a finite-dimensional Noetherian scheme (for example the spectrum of the complex numbers), and let Sm/S denote the category of smooth schemes over S. Equip Sm/S with the Nisnevich topology to get the site (Sm/S)Nis. The homotopy category (or infinity category) associated to the -local model structure on is called the A1-homotopy category. It is denoted . Similarly, for the pointed simplicial sheaves there is an associated pointed homotopy category .

Note that by construction, for any X in Sm/S, there is an isomorphism

X ×SA1
S
X,

in the homotopy category.

Properties of the theory

Wedge and smash products of simplicial (pre)sheaves

Because we started with a simplicial model category to construct the -homotopy category, there are a number of structures inherited from the abstract theory of simplicial models categories. In particular, for pointed simplicial sheaves in we can form the wedge product as the colimit

and the smash product is defined as

recovering some of the classical constructions in homotopy theory. There is in addition a cone of a simplicial (pre)sheaf and a cone of a morphism, but defining these requires the definition of the simplicial spheres.

Simplicial spheres

From the fact we start with a simplicial model category, this means there is a cosimplicial functor

defining the simplices in . Recall the algebraic n-simplex is given by the -scheme

Embedding these schemes as constant presheaves and sheafifying gives objects in , which we denote by . These are the objects in the image of , i.e. . Then using abstract simplicial homotopy theory, we get the simplicial spheres

We can then form the cone of a simplicial (pre)sheaf as

and form the cone of a morphism as the colimit of the diagram

In addition, the cofiber of is simply the suspension. In the pointed homotopy category there is additionally the suspension functor

given by

and its right adjoint

called the loop space functor.

Remarks

The setup, especially the Nisnevich topology, is chosen as to make algebraic K-theory representable by a spectrum, and in some aspects to make a proof of the Bloch-Kato conjecture possible.

After the Morel-Voevodsky construction there have been several different approaches to A1 homotopy theory by using other model category structures or by using other sheaves than Nisnevich sheaves (for example, Zariski sheaves or just all presheaves). Each of these constructions yields the same homotopy category.

There are two kinds of spheres in the theory: those coming from the multiplicative group playing the role of the 1-sphere in topology, and those coming from the simplicial sphere (considered as constant simplicial sheaf). This leads to a theory of motivic spheres Sp,q with two indices. To compute the homotopy groups of motivic spheres would also yield the classical stable homotopy groups of the spheres, so in this respect A1 homotopy theory is at least as complicated as classical homotopy theory.

Motivic analogies

Eilenberg-Maclane spaces

For an abelian group the -motivic cohomology of a smooth scheme is given by the sheaf hypercohomology groups

for . Representing this cohomology is a simplicial abelian sheaf denoted corresponding to which is considered as an object in the pointed motivic homotopy category . Then, for a smooth scheme we have the equivalence

showing these sheaves represent motivic Eilenberg-Maclane spaces [1] pg 3.

The stable homotopy category

A further construction in A1-homotopy theory is the category SH(S), which is obtained from the above unstable category by forcing the smash product with Gm to become invertible. This process can be carried out either using model-categorical constructions using so-called Gm-spectra or alternatively using infinity-categories.

For S = Spec (R), the spectrum of the field of real numbers, there is a functor

to the stable homotopy category from algebraic topology. The functor is characterized by sending a smooth scheme X / R to the real manifold associated to X. This functor has the property that it sends the map

to an equivalence, since is homotopy equivalent to a two-point set. Bachmann (2018) has shown that the resulting functor

is an equivalence.

Related Research Articles

In mathematics, a sheaf is a tool for systematically tracking data attached to the open sets of a topological space and defined locally with regard to them. For example, for each open set, the data could be the ring of continuous functions defined on that open set. Such data are well behaved in that they can be restricted to smaller open sets, and also the data assigned to an open set are equivalent to all collections of compatible data assigned to collections of smaller open sets covering the original open set.

In algebraic geometry, motives is a theory proposed by Alexander Grothendieck in the 1960s to unify the vast array of similarly behaved cohomology theories such as singular cohomology, de Rham cohomology, etale cohomology, and crystalline cohomology. Philosophically, a "motif" is the "cohomology essence" of a variety.

In mathematics, an algebraic stack is a vast generalization of algebraic spaces, or schemes, which are foundational for studying moduli theory. Many moduli spaces are constructed using techniques specific to algebraic stacks, such as Artin's representability theorem, which is used to construct the moduli space of pointed algebraic curves and the moduli stack of elliptic curves. Originally, they were introduced by Alexander Grothendieck to keep track of automorphisms on moduli spaces, a technique which allows for treating these moduli spaces as if their underlying schemes or algebraic spaces are smooth. After Grothendieck developed the general theory of descent, and Giraud the general theory of stacks, the notion of algebraic stacks was defined by Michael Artin.

In mathematics, the derived categoryD(A) of an abelian category A is a construction of homological algebra introduced to refine and in a certain sense to simplify the theory of derived functors defined on A. The construction proceeds on the basis that the objects of D(A) should be chain complexes in A, with two such chain complexes considered isomorphic when there is a chain map that induces an isomorphism on the level of homology of the chain complexes. Derived functors can then be defined for chain complexes, refining the concept of hypercohomology. The definitions lead to a significant simplification of formulas otherwise described (not completely faithfully) by complicated spectral sequences.

In mathematics, a simplicial set is an object composed of simplices in a specific way. Simplicial sets are higher-dimensional generalizations of directed graphs, partially ordered sets and categories. Formally, a simplicial set may be defined as a contravariant functor from the simplex category to the category of sets. Simplicial sets were introduced in 1950 by Samuel Eilenberg and Joseph A. Zilber.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Triangulation (topology)</span>

In mathematics, triangulation describes the replacement of topological spaces by piecewise linear spaces, i.e. the choice of a homeomorphism in a suitable simplicial complex. Spaces being homeomorphic to a simplicial complex are called triangulable. Triangulation has various uses in different branches of mathematics, for instance in algebraic topology, in complex analysis or in modeling.

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a presheaf on a category is a functor . If is the poset of open sets in a topological space, interpreted as a category, then one recovers the usual notion of presheaf on a topological space.

In mathematics, the Leray spectral sequence was a pioneering example in homological algebra, introduced in 1946 by Jean Leray. It is usually seen nowadays as a special case of the Grothendieck spectral sequence.

In mathematics, Kan complexes and Kan fibrations are part of the theory of simplicial sets. Kan fibrations are the fibrations of the standard model category structure on simplicial sets and are therefore of fundamental importance. Kan complexes are the fibrant objects in this model category. The name is in honor of Daniel Kan.

In mathematics, Hochschild homology (and cohomology) is a homology theory for associative algebras over rings. There is also a theory for Hochschild homology of certain functors. Hochschild cohomology was introduced by Gerhard Hochschild (1945) for algebras over a field, and extended to algebras over more general rings by Henri Cartan and Samuel Eilenberg (1956).

In algebraic geometry, the Nisnevich topology, sometimes called the completely decomposed topology, is a Grothendieck topology on the category of schemes which has been used in algebraic K-theory, A¹ homotopy theory, and the theory of motives. It was originally introduced by Yevsey Nisnevich, who was motivated by the theory of adeles.

In mathematics, the cotangent complex is a common generalisation of the cotangent sheaf, normal bundle and virtual tangent bundle of a map of geometric spaces such as manifolds or schemes. If is a morphism of geometric or algebraic objects, the corresponding cotangent complex can be thought of as a universal "linearization" of it, which serves to control the deformation theory of . It is constructed as an object in a certain derived category of sheaves on using the methods of homotopical algebra.

In algebraic geometry, the h topology is a Grothendieck topology introduced by Vladimir Voevodsky to study the homology of schemes. It combines several good properties possessed by its related "sub"topologies, such as the qfh and cdh topologies. It has subsequently been used by Beilinson to study p-adic Hodge theory, in Bhatt and Scholze's work on projectivity of the affine Grassmanian, Huber and Jörder's study of differential forms, etc.

In mathematics, more specifically in homotopy theory, a simplicial presheaf is a presheaf on a site taking values in simplicial sets. Equivalently, a simplicial presheaf is a simplicial object in the category of presheaves on a site. The notion was introduced by A. Joyal in the 1970s. Similarly, a simplicial sheaf on a site is a simplicial object in the category of sheaves on the site.

Derived algebraic geometry is a branch of mathematics that generalizes algebraic geometry to a situation where commutative rings, which provide local charts, are replaced by either differential graded algebras, simplicial commutative rings or -ring spectra from algebraic topology, whose higher homotopy groups account for the non-discreteness of the structure sheaf. Grothendieck's scheme theory allows the structure sheaf to carry nilpotent elements. Derived algebraic geometry can be thought of as an extension of this idea, and provides natural settings for intersection theory of singular algebraic varieties and cotangent complexes in deformation theory, among the other applications.

In algebraic geometry, Bloch's higher Chow groups, a generalization of Chow group, is a precursor and a basic example of motivic cohomology. It was introduced by Spencer Bloch and the basic theory has been developed by Bloch and Marc Levine.

This is a glossary of properties and concepts in algebraic topology in mathematics.

In algebraic geometry, a presheaf with transfers is, roughly, a presheaf that, like cohomology theory, comes with pushforwards, “transfer” maps. Precisely, it is, by definition, a contravariant additive functor from the category of finite correspondences to the category of abelian groups.

In mathematics, compact objects, also referred to as finitely presented objects, or objects of finite presentation, are objects in a category satisfying a certain finiteness condition.

In mathematics, derived noncommutative algebraic geometry, the derived version of noncommutative algebraic geometry, is the geometric study of derived categories and related constructions of triangulated categories using categorical tools. Some basic examples include the bounded derived category of coherent sheaves on a smooth variety, , called its derived category, or the derived category of perfect complexes on an algebraic variety, denoted . For instance, the derived category of coherent sheaves on a smooth projective variety can be used as an invariant of the underlying variety for many cases. Unfortunately, studying derived categories as geometric objects of themselves does not have a standardized name.

References

  1. Voevodsky, Vladimir (15 July 2001). "Reduced power operations in motivic cohomology". arXiv: math/0107109 .

Survey articles and lectures

Motivic homotopy

Foundations

Motivic Steenrod algebra

Motivic adams spectral sequence

Spectra

Bloch-Kato

Applications

References