Waring's problem

Last updated

In number theory, Waring's problem asks whether each natural number k has an associated positive integer s such that every natural number is the sum of at most s natural numbers raised to the power k. For example, every natural number is the sum of at most 4 squares, 9 cubes, or 19 fourth powers. Waring's problem was proposed in 1770 by Edward Waring, after whom it is named. Its affirmative answer, known as the Hilbert–Waring theorem, was provided by Hilbert in 1909. [1] Waring's problem has its own Mathematics Subject Classification, 11P05, "Waring's problem and variants".

Contents

Relationship with Lagrange's four-square theorem

Long before Waring posed his problem, Diophantus had asked whether every positive integer could be represented as the sum of four perfect squares greater than or equal to zero. This question later became known as Bachet's conjecture, after the 1621 translation of Diophantus by Claude Gaspard Bachet de Méziriac, and it was solved by Joseph-Louis Lagrange in his four-square theorem in 1770, the same year Waring made his conjecture. Waring sought to generalize this problem by trying to represent all positive integers as the sum of cubes, integers to the fourth power, and so forth, to show that any positive integer may be represented as the sum of other integers raised to a specific exponent, and that there was always a maximum number of integers raised to a certain exponent required to represent all positive integers in this way.

The number g(k)

For every , let denote the minimum number of th powers of naturals needed to represent all positive integers. Every positive integer is the sum of one first power, itself, so . Some simple computations show that 7 requires 4 squares, 23 requires 9 cubes, [2] and 79 requires 19 fourth powers; these examples show that , , and . Waring conjectured that these lower bounds were in fact exact values.

Lagrange's four-square theorem of 1770 states that every natural number is the sum of at most four squares. Since three squares are not enough, this theorem establishes . Lagrange's four-square theorem was conjectured in Bachet's 1621 edition of Diophantus's Arithmetica ; Fermat claimed to have a proof, but did not publish it. [3]

Over the years various bounds were established, using increasingly sophisticated and complex proof techniques. For example, Liouville showed that is at most 53. Hardy and Littlewood showed that all sufficiently large numbers are the sum of at most 19 fourth powers.

That was established from 1909 to 1912 by Wieferich [4] and A. J. Kempner, [5] in 1986 by R. Balasubramanian, F. Dress, and J.-M. Deshouillers, [6] [7] in 1964 by Chen Jingrun, and in 1940 by Pillai. [8]

Let and respectively denote the integral and fractional part of a positive real number . Given the number , only and can be used to represent ; the most economical representation requires terms of and terms of . It follows that is at least as large as . This was noted by J. A. Euler, the son of Leonhard Euler, in about 1772. [9] Later work by Dickson, Pillai, Rubugunday, Niven [10] and many others has proved that

No value of is known for which . Mahler [11] proved that there can only be a finite number of such , and Kubina and Wunderlich [12] have shown that any such must satisfy . Thus it is conjectured that this never happens, that is, for every positive integer .

The first few values of are:

1, 4, 9, 19, 37, 73, 143, 279, 548, 1079, 2132, 4223, 8384, 16673, 33203, 66190, 132055, 263619, 526502, 1051899, ... (sequence A002804 in the OEIS ).

The number G(k)

From the work of Hardy and Littlewood, [13] the related quantity G(k) was studied with g(k). G(k) is defined to be the least positive integer s such that every sufficiently large integer (i.e. every integer greater than some constant) can be represented as a sum of at most s positive integers to the power of k. Clearly, G(1) = 1. Since squares are congruent to 0, 1, or 4 (mod 8), no integer congruent to 7 (mod 8) can be represented as a sum of three squares, implying that G(2) ≥ 4. Since G(k) ≤ g(k) for all k, this shows that G(2) = 4. Davenport showed [14] that G(4) = 16 in 1939, by demonstrating that any sufficiently large number congruent to 1 through 14 mod 16 could be written as a sum of 14 fourth powers (Vaughan in 1986 [15] and 1989 [16] reduced the 14 biquadrates successively to 13 and 12). The exact value of G(k) is unknown for any other k, but there exist bounds.

Lower bounds for G(k)

Bounds
1 = G(1) = 1
4 = G(2) = 4
4 ≤ G(3) ≤ 7
16 = G(4) = 16
6 ≤ G(5) ≤ 17
9 ≤ G(6) ≤ 24
8 ≤ G(7) ≤ 33
32 ≤ G(8) ≤ 42
13 ≤ G(9) ≤ 50
12 ≤ G(10) ≤ 59
12 ≤ G(11) ≤ 67
16 ≤ G(12) ≤ 76
14 ≤ G(13) ≤ 84
15 ≤ G(14) ≤ 92
16 ≤ G(15) ≤ 100
64 ≤ G(16) ≤ 109
18 ≤ G(17) ≤ 117
27 ≤ G(18) ≤ 125
20 ≤ G(19) ≤ 134
25 ≤ G(20) ≤ 142

The number G(k) is greater than or equal to

2r+2if k = 2r with r 2, or k = 3 × 2r;
pr+1if p is a prime greater than 2 and k = pr(p 1);
(pr+1 − 1)/2  if p is a prime greater than 2 and k = pr(p 1)/2;
k + 1for all integers k greater than 1.

In the absence of congruence restrictions, a density argument suggests that G(k) should equal k + 1.

Upper bounds for G(k)

G(3) is at least 4 (since cubes are congruent to 0, 1 or −1 mod 9); for numbers less than 1.3×109, 1290740 is the last to require 6 cubes, and the number of numbers between N and 2N requiring 5 cubes drops off with increasing N at sufficient speed to have people believe that G(3) = 4; [17] the largest number now known not to be a sum of 4 cubes is 7373170279850, [18] and the authors give reasonable arguments there that this may be the largest possible. The upper bound G(3) ≤ 7 is due to Linnik in 1943. [19] (All nonnegative integers require at most 9 cubes, and the largest integers requiring 9, 8, 7, 6 and 5 cubes are conjectured to be 239, 454, 8042, 1290740 and 7373170279850, respectively.)

13792 is the largest number to require 17 fourth powers (Deshouillers, Hennecart and Landreau showed in 2000 [20] that every number between 13793 and 10245 required at most 16, and Kawada, Wooley and Deshouillers extended [21] Davenport's 1939 result to show that every number above 10220 required no more than 16). Numbers of the form 31·16n always require 16 fourth powers.

68578904422 is the last known number that requires 9 fifth powers (Integer sequence S001057, Tony D. Noe, Jul 04 2017), 617597724 is the last number less than 1.3×109 that requires 10 fifth powers, and 51033617 is the last number less than 1.3×109 that requires 11.

The upper bounds on the right with k = 5, 6, ..., 20 are due to Vaughan and Wooley. [22]

Using his improved Hardy-Littlewood method, I. M. Vinogradov published numerous refinements leading to

in 1947 [23] and, ultimately,

for an unspecified constant C and sufficiently large k in 1959. [24]

Applying his p-adic form of the Hardy–Littlewood–Ramanujan–Vinogradov method to estimating trigonometric sums, in which the summation is taken over numbers with small prime divisors, Anatolii Alexeevitch Karatsuba obtained [25] (1985) a new estimate of the Hardy function (for ):

Further refinements were obtained by Vaughan in 1989. [16]

Wooley then established that for some constant C, [26]

Vaughan and Wooley's survey article from 2002 was comprehensive at the time. [22]

See also

Notes

  1. Hilbert, David (1909). "Beweis für die Darstellbarkeit der ganzen Zahlen durch eine feste Anzahl n-ter Potenzen (Waringsches Problem)". Mathematische Annalen (in German). 67 (3): 281–300. doi:10.1007/bf01450405. MR   1511530. S2CID   179177986.
  2. Remember we restrict ourselves to natural numbers. With general integers, it is not hard to write 23 as the sum of 4 cubes, e.g. or .
  3. Dickson, Leonard Eugene (1920). "Chapter VIII". History of the Theory of Numbers. Vol. II: Diophantine Analysis. Carnegie Institute of Washington.
  4. Wieferich, Arthur (1909). "Beweis des Satzes, daß sich eine jede ganze Zahl als Summe von höchstens neun positiven Kuben darstellen läßt". Mathematische Annalen (in German). 66 (1): 95–101. doi:10.1007/BF01450913. S2CID   121386035.
  5. Kempner, Aubrey (1912). "Bemerkungen zum Waringschen Problem". Mathematische Annalen (in German). 72 (3): 387–399. doi:10.1007/BF01456723. S2CID   120101223.
  6. Balasubramanian, Ramachandran; Deshouillers, Jean-Marc; Dress, François (1986). "Problème de Waring pour les bicarrés. I. Schéma de la solution" [Waring's problem for biquadrates. I. Sketch of the solution]. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série I (in French). 303 (4): 85–88. MR   0853592.
  7. Balasubramanian, Ramachandran; Deshouillers, Jean-Marc; Dress, François (1986). "Problème de Waring pour les bicarrés. II. Résultats auxiliaires pour le théorème asymptotique" [Waring's problem for biquadrates. II. Auxiliary results for the asymptotic theorem]. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série I (in French). 303 (5): 161–163. MR   0854724.
  8. Pillai, S. S. (1940). "On Waring's problem g(6) = 73". Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 12: 30–40. doi:10.1007/BF03170721. MR   0002993. S2CID   185097940.
  9. L. Euler, "Opera posthuma" (1), 203–204 (1862).
  10. Niven, Ivan M. (1944). "An unsolved case of the Waring problem". American Journal of Mathematics . 66 (1). The Johns Hopkins University Press: 137–143. doi:10.2307/2371901. JSTOR   2371901. MR   0009386.
  11. Mahler, Kurt (1957). "On the fractional parts of the powers of a rational number II". Mathematika . 4 (2): 122–124. doi:10.1112/s0025579300001170. MR   0093509.
  12. Kubina, Jeffrey M.; Wunderlich, Marvin C. (1990). "Extending Waring's conjecture to 471,600,000". Math. Comp. 55 (192): 815–820. Bibcode:1990MaCom..55..815K. doi:10.2307/2008448. JSTOR   2008448. MR   1035936.
  13. Hardy, G. H.; Littlewood, J. E. (1922). "Some problems of Partitio Numerorum: IV. The singular series in Waring's Problem and the value of the number G(k)". Mathematische Zeitschrift. 12 (1): 161–188. doi:10.1007/BF01482074. ISSN   0025-5874.
  14. Davenport, H. (1939). "On Waring's Problem for Fourth Powers". Annals of Mathematics . 40 (4): 731–747. Bibcode:1939AnMat..40..731D. doi:10.2307/1968889. JSTOR   1968889.
  15. Vaughan, R. C. (1986). "On Waring's Problem for Smaller Exponents". Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. s3-52 (3): 445–463. doi:10.1112/plms/s3-52.3.445.
  16. 1 2 Vaughan, R. C. (1989). "A new iterative method in Waring's problem". Acta Mathematica. 162 (0): 1–71. doi:10.1007/BF02392834. ISSN   0001-5962.
  17. Nathanson (1996 , p. 71).
  18. Deshouillers, Jean-Marc; Hennecart, François; Landreau, Bernard; I. Gusti Putu Purnaba, Appendix by (2000). "7373170279850". Mathematics of Computation. 69 (229): 421–439. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-99-01116-3 .
  19. U. V. Linnik. "On the representation of large numbers as sums of seven cubes". Mat. Sb. N.S. 12(54), 218–224 (1943).
  20. Deshouillers, Jean-Marc; Hennecart, François; Landreau, Bernard (2000). "Waring's Problem for sixteen biquadrates – numerical results". Journal de théorie des nombres de Bordeaux . 12 (2): 411–422. doi: 10.5802/jtnb.287 .
  21. Deshouillers, Jean-Marc; Kawada, Koichi; Wooley, Trevor D. (2005). "On Sums of Sixteen Biquadrates". Mémoires de la Société mathématique de France. 1: 1–120. doi:10.24033/msmf.413. ISSN   0249-633X.
  22. 1 2 Vaughan, R. C.; Wooley, Trevor (2002). "Waring's Problem: A Survey". In Bennet, Michael A.; Berndt, Bruce C.; Boston, Nigel; Diamond, Harold G.; Hildebrand, Adolf J.; Philipp, Walter (eds.). Number Theory for the Millennium. Vol. III. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters. pp. 301–340. ISBN   978-1-56881-152-9. MR   1956283.
  23. Vinogradov, Ivan Matveevich (1 Sep 2004) [1947]. The Method of Trigonometrical Sums in the Theory of Numbers. Translated by Roth, K.F.; Davenport, Anne. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. ISBN   978-0-486-43878-8.
  24. "I. M. Vinogradov, "On an upper bound for $G(n)$", Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 23:5 (1959), 637–642". Math-Net.Ru (in Russian). Retrieved 18 Apr 2024.
  25. Karatsuba, A. A. (1985). "On the function G(n) in Waring's problem". Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Math. 27 (49:5): 935–947. Bibcode:1986IzMat..27..239K. doi:10.1070/IM1986v027n02ABEH001176.
  26. Vaughan, R. C. (1997). The Hardy–Littlewood method. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Vol. 125 (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   0-521-57347-5. Zbl   0868.11046.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Riemann zeta function</span> Analytic function in mathematics

The Riemann zeta function or Euler–Riemann zeta function, denoted by the Greek letter ζ (zeta), is a mathematical function of a complex variable defined as

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Goldbach's conjecture</span> Even integers as sums of two primes

Goldbach's conjecture is one of the oldest and best-known unsolved problems in number theory and all of mathematics. It states that every even natural number greater than 2 is the sum of two prime numbers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Floor and ceiling functions</span> Nearest integers from a number

In mathematics, the floor function (or greatest integer function) is the function that takes as input a real number x, and gives as output the greatest integer less than or equal to x, denoted x or floor(x). Similarly, the ceiling function maps x to the smallest integer greater than or equal to x, denoted x or ceil(x).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Goldbach's weak conjecture</span> Solved conjecture about prime numbers

In number theory, Goldbach's weak conjecture, also known as the odd Goldbach conjecture, the ternary Goldbach problem, or the 3-primes problem, states that

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Analytic number theory</span> Exploring properties of the integers with complex analysis

In mathematics, analytic number theory is a branch of number theory that uses methods from mathematical analysis to solve problems about the integers. It is often said to have begun with Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet's 1837 introduction of Dirichlet L-functions to give the first proof of Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions. It is well known for its results on prime numbers and additive number theory.

In number theory, a formula for primes is a formula generating the prime numbers, exactly and without exception. Formulas for calculating primes do exist, however, they are computationally very slow. A number of constraints are known, showing what such a "formula" can and cannot be.

In mathematics, the Hardy–Ramanujan–Littlewood circle method is a technique of analytic number theory. It is named for G. H. Hardy, S. Ramanujan, and J. E. Littlewood, who developed it in a series of papers on Waring's problem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colossally abundant number</span> Type of natural number

In number theory, a colossally abundant number is a natural number that, in a particular, rigorous sense, has many divisors. Particularly, it is defined by a ratio between the sum of an integer's divisors and that integer raised to a power higher than one. For any such exponent, whichever integer has the highest ratio is a colossally abundant number. It is a stronger restriction than that of a superabundant number, but not strictly stronger than that of an abundant number.

In mathematics, a Kloosterman sum is a particular kind of exponential sum. They are named for the Dutch mathematician Hendrik Kloosterman, who introduced them in 1926 when he adapted the Hardy–Littlewood circle method to tackle a problem involving positive definite diagonal quadratic forms in four as opposed to five or more variables, which he had dealt with in his dissertation in 1924.

Euclid's theorem is a fundamental statement in number theory that asserts that there are infinitely many prime numbers. It was first proven by Euclid in his work Elements. There are several proofs of the theorem.

Additive number theory is the subfield of number theory concerning the study of subsets of integers and their behavior under addition. More abstractly, the field of additive number theory includes the study of abelian groups and commutative semigroups with an operation of addition. Additive number theory has close ties to combinatorial number theory and the geometry of numbers. Two principal objects of study are the sumset of two subsets A and B of elements from an abelian group G,

In number theory, Vinogradov's theorem is a result which implies that any sufficiently large odd integer can be written as a sum of three prime numbers. It is a weaker form of Goldbach's weak conjecture, which would imply the existence of such a representation for all odd integers greater than five. It is named after Ivan Matveyevich Vinogradov, who proved it in the 1930s. Hardy and Littlewood had shown earlier that this result followed from the generalized Riemann hypothesis, and Vinogradov was able to remove this assumption. The full statement of Vinogradov's theorem gives asymptotic bounds on the number of representations of an odd integer as a sum of three primes. The notion of "sufficiently large" was ill-defined in Vinogradov's original work, but in 2002 it was shown that 101346 is sufficiently large. Additionally numbers up to 1020 had been checked via brute force methods, thus only a finite number of cases to check remained before the odd Goldbach conjecture would be proven or disproven. In 2013, Harald Helfgott proved Goldbach's weak conjecture for all cases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Landau's problems</span> Four basic unsolved problems about prime numbers

At the 1912 International Congress of Mathematicians, Edmund Landau listed four basic problems about prime numbers. These problems were characterised in his speech as "unattackable at the present state of mathematics" and are now known as Landau's problems. They are as follows:

  1. Goldbach's conjecture: Can every even integer greater than 2 be written as the sum of two primes?
  2. Twin prime conjecture: Are there infinitely many primes p such that p + 2 is prime?
  3. Legendre's conjecture: Does there always exist at least one prime between consecutive perfect squares?
  4. Are there infinitely many primes p such that p − 1 is a perfect square? In other words: Are there infinitely many primes of the form n2 + 1?
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divisor summatory function</span> Summatory function of the divisor-counting function

In number theory, the divisor summatory function is a function that is a sum over the divisor function. It frequently occurs in the study of the asymptotic behaviour of the Riemann zeta function. The various studies of the behaviour of the divisor function are sometimes called divisor problems.

In mathematics, a Beatty sequence is the sequence of integers found by taking the floor of the positive multiples of a positive irrational number. Beatty sequences are named after Samuel Beatty, who wrote about them in 1926.

In mathematics and statistics, sums of powers occur in a number of contexts:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Riemann hypothesis</span> Conjecture on zeros of the zeta function

In mathematics, the Riemann hypothesis is the conjecture that the Riemann zeta function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part 1/2. Many consider it to be the most important unsolved problem in pure mathematics. It is of great interest in number theory because it implies results about the distribution of prime numbers. It was proposed by Bernhard Riemann, after whom it is named.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anatoly Karatsuba</span> Russian mathematician (1937–2008)

Anatoly Alexeyevich Karatsuba was a Russian mathematician working in the field of analytic number theory, p-adic numbers and Dirichlet series.

The Waring–Goldbach problem is a problem in additive number theory, concerning the representation of integers as sums of powers of prime numbers. It is named as a combination of Waring's problem on sums of powers of integers, and the Goldbach conjecture on sums of primes. It was initiated by Hua Luogeng in 1938.

In mathematics, Vinogradov's mean value theorem is an estimate for the number of equal sums of powers. It is an important inequality in analytic number theory, named for I. M. Vinogradov.

References