The Cambridge Union ChamberThe Cambridge Union Society
The Baldwin/Buckley Debate was a televised debate of The Cambridge Union Society held on 18th February 1965, which has since come to be seen as one of the most historic and influential intellectual debates on race relations in America. James Baldwin, an influential African American writer and activist, and William F. Buckley, a leading conservative intellectual, debated the motion, “The American dream is at the expense of the American Negro.”
The proposition, led by Baldwin, won by a landslide majority of 380, with the ‘Ayes’ receiving 544 votes to the ‘Noes’ 164.
The debate came at a time of great change, with the Voting Rights Act being passed just months later in the US. Broadcast at the time live on the BBC, it was later rebroadcast on stations across America. In the years since several books and dramatic reproductions, along with countless articles, both academic and media, have been produced about the debate and its impact.
Background
In the early 1960s, Baldwin and Buckley were both firmly entrenched on the American intellectual and political scene, frequently appearing in all forms of media.
Buckley founded and edited the National Review, a conservative editorial magazine (sometimes described as the originator of modern American conservatism[1]), and was a leading conservative 'talking head.' He opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.[2] Baldwin, already well known in the US, rose to international fame in 1962 with the publication of his 20,000-word essay called “Letter from a Region in My Mind”, and by mid-1963, with the publication of The Fire Next Time, he was second only to King as “the face” of the Civil Rights Movement.[3]
In the years preceding the debate, both were engaged in 'intellectual combat' For example, in 1962 Baldwin appeared in a televised debate on segregation opposite the National Review's lead on civil rights, James Jackson Kilpatrick. For his part, Buckley saw himself as having a duty to warn the country to resist the ideas of someone he saw as an 'eloquent menace'.[3]
James Baldwin was visiting the UK to promote his third novel, Another Country, and his publicist Corgi Books contacted the Union to ask if they would be interested in him addressing the chamber.[4] The President replied saying that he would be welcome to participate in a debate, an offer to which he agreed. To find a suitable opponent, the committee spent a week contacting various notable Segregationist Senators, before learning that conveniently Buckley was on a skiing holiday in Switzerland. Buckley quickly agreed to participate in the debate, and the 40 guineas paid by the BBC to broadcast the debate paid for the cost of flying Buckley and his companions in from Switzerland.[5]
The debate
As is traditional at the Cambridge Union, an institution described as 'the world's oldest and most prestigious debating society',[3] the debate took place on a Thursday evening after dinner. An over-capacity crowd of more than 700 students and guests of the Union were packed into the debating chamber, which is modelled after the British House of Commons. A further 500 additional people filled the other rooms on the Union premises, which received a live broadcast organised by the B.B.C.
The debate was chaired by Lent 1965 President Peter Fullerton of Gonville & Caius College. On the recorded program, the debate was introduced from inside the chamber by past Union President and then MP, Norman St John-Stevas (later Baron St John of Fawsley).
The motion presented was that “The American dream is at the expense of the American Negro.” While there were five speakers for the motion and five against, the most notable were James Baldwin and William F. Buckley, giving the debate its popular moniker. As is standard for Union debates, the speaker order alternated between those speaking in proposition and opposition to the motion. All speakers other than Baldwin and Buckley were student members of the society.
Those who spoke in proposition were:
David Heycock, Pembroke (Who proposed the motion and spoke first)
In the BBC recording, only the speeches student proposer and opposer, along with those of Baldwin and Buckley, were included.
There exists in the Cambridge Union archives books recording the minutes of debates stretching back to the origins of the society in 1815, meaning the exact timings of the debate are known. The debate began at 20:45. Baldwin spoke for 24 minutes between 21:17 and 21:41, with Buckley following, speaking for 29 minutes between 21:43 and 22:12. The debate ended upon reaching the length agreed with the BBC, with the house dividing with the ringing of the division bell at 22:41. The results were announced by the President at 22:59.[6]
The proposition, led by Baldwin, won by a landslide majority of 380, with the ‘Ayes’ receiving 544 votes to the ‘Noes’ 164.
Baldwin's speech
James Baldwin
"There is scarcely any hope for the American dream, because the people who are denied participation in it, by their very presence, will wreck it."
Rather than a traditional Union speech, something that often combines the art of intellect with wit, Baldwin delivered a sermon on the dangers of white supremacy to both the 'subjugators' and 'subjugated'.[3] As a work of rhetoric, it is widely seen as among his best, some going so far as to say it 'surpasses even the best of Martin Luther King or JFK'.[7]
Baldwin's central arguments were about the systemic exploitation of African Americans and the deep-seated racism within American society. His impassioned plea for understanding, empathy, and justice can be broken down into five themes as follows:[8]
1. Systemic racism: Baldwin contended that the social, economic, and political systems in the United States were built on the exploitation of African Americans. This oppression had occurred from the time of slavery until the 1960s and was a fundamental part of the American dream's foundation.
"The American Dream is at the expense of the American Negro. I picked the cotton, and I carried it to the market, and I built the railroads under someone else's whip for nothing."
2. Dehumanization: He posited that the oppression of African Americans had not only harmed those oppressed but also dehumanized the oppressors. This dehumanization manifests in the denial of the humanity of African Americans, which Baldwin argued, was a necessary precondition to justify their mistreatment.
"The real question is really a kind of apathy and ignorance, which is the price we pay for segregation. That's what segregation means. You don't know what's happening on the other side of the wall because you don't want to know."
3. Individual versus collective responsibility: Baldwin insisted that the responsibility for addressing systemic racism doesn't lie with African Americans but with the whole American society. It was the moral duty of all Americans to challenge and change the system.
I am not a ward of America. I am not an object of missionary charity. I am one of the people who built the country. Until this moment, there is scarcely any hope for the American Dream."
4. Reality of the American Dream: Baldwin challenged the idea of the American Dream, stating that it wasn't a reality for many African Americans who had been denied the same opportunities as their white counterparts. This, he argued, was the fundamental contradiction at the heart of the American Dream.
It comes as a great shock around the age of 5, 6, or 7 to discover that the flag to which you have pledged allegiance, along with everybody else, has not pledged allegiance to you."
5. Call to consciousness: Baldwin closed with a call to consciousness, urging people, especially white Americans, to confront the ugly realities of racism and the need for change. He maintained that America would never realize its dream until it faced its nightmare – the legacy of racism and exploitation.
The future of the Negro in this country is precisely as bright or as dark as the future of the country. It is entirely up to the American people whether or not they are going to try to find out in their own hearts why it was necessary for them to have a nigger in the first place."
Upon resuming his seat at the end of his speech, Baldwin received a standing ovation lasting over a minute from the gathered members, an endorsement unprecedented in Union history at the time.[9]
Buckley's reply
William F. Buckley Jr.
Although throughout the 1950s and early 1960s, Buckley opposed federal civil rights legislation and expressed support for continued racial segregation in the South, in the years proceeding the debate, and potentially as a result of the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing, Buckley had grown more accommodating of the Civil Rights movement.[10]
Nevertheless, Buckley fundamentally disagreed with the concept of structural racism and placed a large amount of blame for lack of economic growth on the black community itself. This formed the core of Buckley's argument in the debate. His speech[8] can be broken down into 6 themes as follows:
1. Individual responsibility: Buckley placed a strong emphasis on individual responsibility rather than systemic factors. He argued that the challenges faced by African Americans were largely due to cultural and behavioral factors, not systemic racism.
""We must also reach through to the Negro people and tell them that their best chances are in a mobile society. The most mobile society in the world is the United States of America. And it is precisely that mobility which will give opportunities to the Negroes which they must be encouraged to take.""
2. Progress over time: Buckley contended that the conditions for African Americans had been improving over time, citing advancements in economic conditions, educational opportunities, and civil rights.
"I profoundly believe that the American Negro has made and is making extraordinary and heroic efforts to rid himself of the heritage that was inflicted on him, it seems to me, not by the American community, but by nature and by certain specific historical circumstances."
3. Distinction between North and South: He suggested that the egregious racial issues were primarily in the Southern states, rather than a national issue. By making this point, he aimed to underscore that racism was not an intrinsic part of the American dream.
4. American Dream for All: Buckley argued that the American dream was not inherently at the expense of the American Negro. Rather, he claimed that the American dream could and should be attainable for everyone, including African Americans.
"There are individual Negroes, who are among those in the world who are most eloquent. The problem that concerns us here tonight is the disparity in the civilization of the Negro community and the white community."
5. Communism critique: Buckley also criticized what he perceived to be communist influences within the Civil Rights Movement. He associated these elements with attempts to destabilize the American system rather than genuinely seeking racial equality.
"The fact of the matter is that the animadversions against America... by Mr. Baldwin come out in a long and predictable continuum of such complaints, most of them unjustified."
6. Critique of Baldwin: Buckley critiqued Baldwin's position as being overly emotional and not acknowledging the progress made toward racial equality. While Baldwin spoke before Buckley, meaning he could not address Buckley's arguments directly, Buckley made Baldwin the centrepiece of his speech.[9]Brian Balogh states that one of Buckley's key points was that the audience's own reaction to Baldwin is demonstrative of the fact that that some African Americans are treated equally, that African Americans were not uniformly discriminated against.
"It is quite impossible in my judgment to deal with the indictment of Mr. Baldwin unless one is prepared to deal with him as a white man, unless one is prepared to say to him the fact that your skin is black is utterly irrelevant to the arguments that you raise."
Buckley was repeatedly interrupted during his speech by points of information (to an extent a standard practise during Union debates), by contrast Baldwin had spoken without interruption.
Contemporary response, impact and legacy
Aftermath
Broadcast live on the BBC that evening, it was later re-broadcast across America repeatedly on several networks. The New York Times carried a piece on the 'wild applause' received by Baldwin the following day.[5]
The debate occurred at a time of critical importance to the Civil Rights movement, taking place just three days before the assassination of Malcolm X, a week before the murder of Baldwin's friend Jimmie Lee Jackson, and a few weeks before the 'Bloody Sunday' events of the Selma to Montgomery March.[11]
During this time Buckley was attempting to explain away his loss in Cambridge as an “orgy of anti-Americanism,” that precluded any meaningful exchange of ideas. Buckley would say later that he had never lost a debate by such a wide margin, but nevertheless that it was the debate about which he had the most pride because he refused to “give them one goddam inch.[12]
Rematch
Almost immediately on their arrival back to the United States, David Susskind invited both Baldwin and Buckley onto his program, Open End for a rematch of the same debate. Without the formal debate structure provided by the Union to allow him to develop his argument fully, Baldwin did not perform as well this time round.[5] Instead Buckley irritated Baldwin to the extent that Baldwin 'tuned out', something he later said was 'to his eternal dishonour'.[12] Some days after this, Buckley would go onto launch his third bid to become New York's mayor, running a populist campaign.
Legacy
In the following years the debate has come to be seen as a significant moment in both Baldwin and Buckley's career, as well as more broadly the American Civil Rights Movement and it and its impact has been intensely studied across the English-speaking world, but especially in the USA.
It has been argued that the debate 'anticipated' the ways in which the US would address racial inequality in the aftermath of the civil rights movement and into the dawn of the era of neoliberalism in the 1970s.[13]
Buckley recounted the story of the 1965 debate, with his mildly biased perspective, throughout his life, once calling it “the most satisfying debate I ever had.”[5] Yet Buckley himself later changed his stance from that presented in the debate, stating he wished National Review had been more supportive of civil rights legislation in the 1960s.[14] He further said he believed an African American President would be elected 'within decades' and believed such an event would be a "welcome tonic for the American soul"[15] Despite his claims of anti-Americanism, Buckley went on to debate twice more in Cambridge, notably in 1973 on Women's Liberation against Germaine Greer.[16]
Little is known of what Baldwin thought of the debate.
In his piece on the debate Brian Balogh notes how the contemporary political divide seems to have changed its position with respect to this question. While the conservative position in 1965 was that African Americans were in a better position than the majority of the world's population, in the 2016 Presidential Campaign, the conservatives messaging was that 'life is hell' for them. This contrasted with Clinton's messaging which stressed themes of empowerment, improvement, and the work left to be done.[9]
The debate was viewed by millions on its original broadcast, and continues to receive millions of views online.
The Fire is Upon Us
In 2019 Nicholas Buccola, an American writer and lecturer in political thought who holds the Chair in Political Science at Linfield University in McMinnville, Oregon, wrote a much lauded history and analysis of the debate. His book The Fire is Upon Us won the Francis Fuller award for non-fiction writing.[17] The work focuses on the clash of ideas seen in the debate and looks at the personal histories of both Baldwin and Buckley as exemplifying the wider Civil Rights debate in America, in particular how their arguments still resonate today.[18]
In theatre
The debate has frequently been reenacted theatrically, often in an educational setting,[19] but also professionally - recently by the 'American Vicarious' theatre company, who toured throughout the US and UK,[20] as well as by the 'Elevator Repair Company' in 2022.[21]
Modern reimagining
As part of the 55th anniversary celebrations of the March on Washington, Harvard Professor Khalil Gibran Muhammad and Canadian-American political commentator/speechwriter David Frum debated an updated motion inspired by the original, that "The American Dream Is Still at the Expense of African Americans.”[22]
This reimagining came in the context of the George Floyd Protests of 2020, with Muhamed arguing for the continued relevance of Baldwin's arguments in the debate:
"Baldwin's voice as a novelist, as an essayist, as a critic of the hypocrisies of the nation and its core contradictions, speaks to this moment in ways that few other writers can."
Related Research Articles
Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister, activist, and political philosopher who was one of the most prominent leaders in the civil rights movement from 1955 until his assassination in 1968. A black church leader and a son of early civil rights activist and minister Martin Luther King Sr., King advanced civil rights for people of color in the United States through the use of nonviolent resistance and nonviolent civil disobedience against Jim Crow laws and other forms of legalized discrimination.
The civil rights movement was a social movement and campaign from 1954 to 1968 in the United States to abolish legalized racial segregation, discrimination, and disenfranchisement in the country. The movement had its origins in the Reconstruction era during the late 19th century and had its modern roots in the 1940s, although the movement made its largest legislative gains in the 1960s after years of direct actions and grassroots protests. The social movement's major nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience campaigns eventually secured new protections in federal law for the civil rights of all Americans.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. The decision partially overruled the Court's 1896 decision, Plessy v. Ferguson, which held that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality, a doctrine that had come to be known as "separate but equal." The Court's unanimous decision in Brown and its related cases paved the way for integration, was a major victory of the civil rights movement, and a model for many future impact litigation cases.
James Arthur Baldwin was an American writer and civil rights activist who garnered acclaim for his essays, novels, plays, and poems. His 1953 novel Go Tell It on the Mountain has been ranked among the best English-language novels. His 1955 essay collection Notes of a Native Son helped establish his reputation as a voice for human equality. Baldwin was a well-known public figure and orator, especially during the civil rights movement in the United States.
The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, also known as simply the March on Washington or the Great March on Washington, was held in Washington, D.C., on August 28, 1963. The purpose of the march was to advocate for the civil and economic rights of African Americans. At the march, final speaker Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., standing in front of the Lincoln Memorial, delivered his historic "I Have a Dream" speech in which he called for an end to racism and racial segregation.
William Frank Buckley Jr. was an American conservative writer, public intellectual, and political commentator.
James Morris Lawson Jr. is an American activist and university professor. He was a leading theoretician and tactician of nonviolence within the Civil Rights Movement. During the 1960s, he served as a mentor to the Nashville Student Movement and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. He was expelled from Vanderbilt University for his civil rights activism in 1960, and later served as a pastor in Los Angeles for 25 years.
The Cambridge Union Society, also known as the Cambridge Union, is a debating and free speech society in Cambridge, England, and the largest society in the University of Cambridge. The society was founded in 1815 and is the second oldest continuously running debating society in the world, behind the University of St Andrews Union Debating Society. Additionally, the Cambridge Union has served as a model for the foundation of similar societies at several other prominent universities, including the Oxford Union and the Yale Political Union. The Union is a private society with membership open to all students of Cambridge University and Anglia Ruskin University. The Cambridge Union is a registered charity and is completely separate from the Cambridge University Students' Union.
The Fire Next Time is a 1963 non-fiction book by James Baldwin, containing two essays: "My Dungeon Shook: Letter to my Nephew on the One Hundredth Anniversary of the Emancipation" and "Down at the Cross: Letter from a Region of My Mind".
The Militia Act of 1862 was an Act of the 37th United States Congress, during the American Civil War, that authorized a militia draft within a state when the state could not meet its quota with volunteers. The Act, for the first time, also allowed African-Americans to serve in the militias as soldiers and war laborers. Previous to it, since the Militia Acts of 1792, only white male citizens were permitted to participate in the militias.
"Going to Meet the Man" is a short story by American author James Baldwin. It was published in 1965 in the short story collection of the same name.
No Name in the Street is American writer and poet James Baldwin's fourth non-fiction book, first published in 1972. Baldwin describes his views on several historical events and figures: Francisco Franco, McCarthyism, the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Huey Newton, Bobby Seale, Eldridge Cleaver, and the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. The book also covers the Algerian War and Albert Camus' take on it.
The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws introduced in the Southern United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that enforced racial segregation, "Jim Crow" being a pejorative term for an African American. Such laws remained in force until 1965. Formal and informal segregation policies were present in other areas of the United States as well, even as several states outside the South had banned discrimination in public accommodations and voting. Southern laws were enacted by white-dominated state legislatures (Redeemers) to disenfranchise and remove political and economic gains made by African Americans during the Reconstruction era. Such continuing racial segregation was also supported by the successful Lily-white movement.
The Report to the American People on Civil Rights was a speech on civil rights, delivered on radio and television by United States President John F. Kennedy from the Oval Office on June 11, 1963, in which he proposed legislation that would later become the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Expressing civil rights as a moral issue, Kennedy moved past his previous appeals to legality and asserted that the pursuit of racial equality was a just cause. The address signified a shift in his administration's policy towards strong support of the civil rights movement and played a significant role in shaping his legacy as a proponent of civil rights.
African Americans and Jewish Americans have interacted throughout much of the history of the United States. This relationship has included widely publicized cooperation and conflict, and—since the 1970s—it has been an area of significant academic research. Cooperation during the Civil Rights Movement was strategic and significant, culminating in the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The Baldwin–Kennedy meeting of May 24, 1963 was an attempt to improve race relations in the United States. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy invited novelist James Baldwin, along with a large group of cultural leaders, to meet Kennedy in an apartment in New York City. The meeting became antagonistic and the group reached no consensus. The black delegation generally felt that Kennedy did not understand the full extent of racism in the United States. Ultimately the meeting demonstrated the urgency of the racial situation and was a positive turning point in Kennedy's attitude towards the Civil Rights Movement.
In the United States, black genocide is the argument that the systemic mistreatment of African Americans by both the United States government and white Americans, both in the past and the present, amounts to genocide. The decades of lynchings and long-term racial discrimination were first formally described as genocide by a now-defunct organization, the Civil Rights Congress, in a petition which it submitted to the United Nations in 1951. In the 1960s, Malcolm X accused the US government of engaging in human rights abuses, including genocide, against black people, citing long-term injustice, cruelty, and violence against blacks by whites.
The history of the 1954 to 1968 American civil rights movement has been depicted and documented in film, song, theater, television, and the visual arts. These presentations add to and maintain cultural awareness and understanding of the goals, tactics, and accomplishments of the people who organized and participated in this nonviolent movement.
I Am Not Your Negro is a 2016 German-American documentary film and social critique film essay directed by Raoul Peck, based on James Baldwin's unfinished manuscript Remember This House. Narrated by actor Samuel L. Jackson, the film explores the history of racism in the United States through Baldwin's recollections of civil rights leaders Medgar Evers, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr., as well as his personal observations of American history. It was nominated for Best Documentary Feature at the 89th Academy Awards and won the BAFTA Award for Best Documentary.
The history of black people in Cambridge, UK cannot easily be separated from the history of Cambridge University. The university has attracted students from Africa and the African diaspora to the town of Cambridge for more than two centuries. Several notable black people had a Cambridge association in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and at the end of the eighteenth century Cambridge became a centre of abolitionist sentiment. From the end of the nineteenth century the university started to admit black students in larger numbers. In recent decades, however, the relatively low number of black students admitted to the university has become a topic of media comment and public concern.
↑ McClure, Daniel. "The Possession of History and American Innocence: James Baldwin, William F. Buckley, Jr., and the 1965 Cambridge Debate". Manchester University.
↑ Felzenberg, Alvin S. (2017). A Man and His Presidents: The Political Odyssey of William F. Buckley Jr. New Haven/London: Yale University Press. pp.159–60. ISBN978-0-300-16384-1. I once believed we could evolve our way up from Jim Crow. I was wrong. Federal intervention was necessary.
McClure, Daniel R, The Possession of History and American Innocence: James Baldwin, William F. Buckley, Jr., and the 1965 Cambridge Debate. (Manchester University Press).
Vaught, Seneca, James Baldwin vs. William F. Buckley, Jr. for the Soul of America. (2014).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
