Bryant & Ors v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd

Last updated

Bryant & Ors v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd is a decision of the High Court of Australia. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

The case confirmed the abolition of the 'peak indebtedness rule' for Australian corporate liquidations. The rule had been previously deprecated by the Full Federal Court, and the High Court decided to confirm the lower court's ruling on appeal.

The peak indebtedness rule, was a previously applied common law rule that operated where a liquidator needed to identify unfair preference payments in a situation where the liquidated company and its creditor had an ongoing business account with each other (for example, an ongoing service contract). The rule allowed a liquidator to calculate the amount of an unfair preference payment by first, (1) identifying the highest amount of debt owed by the company to the creditor in the last 6 months, and then (2) assessing how much this indebtedness had been reduced by the date of the liquidation. The unfair preference at law would then be determined by obtaining the difference between these two figures. [3]

The High Court decided that Pt 5.7B of the Corporations Act didn't incorporate the common law 'peak indebtedness rule'. It additionally held that whether a 'transaction is, for commercial purposes, an integral part of a continuing business relationship' under s588FA(3)(a) involves a factual inquiry about the 'business character' of the transaction. Some of the transactions were found to have formed part of the continuing business relationship, while others occurred after the business relationship had finished, and so did not.

It was additionally held that to be an 'unfair preference' the 'deemed single transaction' needed to reduce the indebtedness of the liquidated company to its creditor. On the case's facts, the net indebtedness of the liquidated company to its creditor increased, so no finding of an unfair preference was made. [8]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liquidation</span> Winding-up of a company

Liquidation is the process in accounting by which a company is brought to an end in Canada, United Kingdom, United States, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Italy, and many other countries. The assets and property of the company are redistributed. Liquidation is also sometimes referred to as winding-up or dissolution, although dissolution technically refers to the last stage of liquidation. The process of liquidation also arises when customs, an authority or agency in a country responsible for collecting and safeguarding customs duties, determines the final computation or ascertainment of the duties or drawback accruing on an entry.

A number of legal systems make provision for companies trading while insolvent to be unlawful in certain circumstances, and provide for directors to become personally liable for a company's debts if they have acted improperly. In most legal systems, the liability in respect of unlawful transactions only extends for a certain period of time prior to the company going into liquidation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Insolvency</span> State of being unable to pay ones debts

In accounting, insolvency is the state of being unable to pay the debts, by a person or company (debtor), at maturity; those in a state of insolvency are said to be insolvent. There are two forms: cash-flow insolvency and balance-sheet insolvency.

An unfair preference is a legal term arising in bankruptcy law where a person or company transfers assets or pays a debt to a creditor shortly before going into bankruptcy, that payment or transfer can be set aside on the application of the liquidator or trustee in bankruptcy as an unfair preference or simply a preference.

An undervalue transaction is a transaction entered into by a company who subsequently goes into bankruptcy which the court orders be set aside, usually upon the application of a liquidator for the benefit of the debtor's creditors. This can occur where the transaction was seriously disadvantageous to the company and the company was insolvent or in immediate risk of becoming insolvent.

In law, a liquidator is the officer appointed when a company goes into winding-up or liquidation who has responsibility for collecting in all of the assets under such circumstances of the company and settling all claims against the company before putting the company into dissolution. Liquidator is a person officially appointed to 'liquidate' a company or firm. Their duty is to ascertain and settle the liabilities of a company or a firm. If there are any surplus, then those are distributed to the contributories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom insolvency law</span> Law in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

United Kingdom insolvency law regulates companies in the United Kingdom which are unable to repay their debts. While UK bankruptcy law concerns the rules for natural persons, the term insolvency is generally used for companies formed under the Companies Act 2006. Insolvency means being unable to pay debts. Since the Cork Report of 1982, the modern policy of UK insolvency law has been to attempt to rescue a company that is in difficulty, to minimise losses and fairly distribute the burdens between the community, employees, creditors and other stakeholders that result from enterprise failure. If a company cannot be saved it is liquidated, meaning that the assets are sold off to repay creditors according to their priority. The main sources of law include the Insolvency Act 1986, the Insolvency Rules 1986, the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, the Employment Rights Act 1996 Part XII, the EU Insolvency Regulation, and case law. Numerous other Acts, statutory instruments and cases relating to labour, banking, property and conflicts of laws also shape the subject.

<i>Re MC Bacon Ltd</i> (No 1)

Re MC Bacon Ltd [1990] BCLC 324 is a leading UK insolvency law case, concerning transactions at an undervalue and voidable preferences.

<i>British Eagle International Airlines Ltd v Compagnie Nationale Air France</i>

British Eagle International Air Lines Ltd v Cie Nationale Air France [1975] 1 WLR 758 is a UK insolvency law case, concerning priority of creditors in a company winding up.

Austin Australia was a Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, based 'design and construct' building organisation, specialising in complex buildings. It was originally formed in 1961 as a wholly owned subsidiary of The Austin Company, Cleveland, Ohio, initially under the name of Austin Anderson Pty Ltd, it changed its name to Austin Australia in 1982. With headquarters in Sydney and branches in Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide and South-East Asia, The Austin Company retained ownership of Austin Australia until 1997, when it was acquired by private Australian ownership. However, it retained an affiliation status with The Austin Company in the USA

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Virgin Islands company law</span>

The British Virgin Islands company law is the law that governs businesses registered in the British Virgin Islands. It is primarily codified through the BVI Business Companies Act, 2004, and to a lesser extent by the Insolvency Act, 2003 and by the Securities and Investment Business Act, 2010. The British Virgin Islands has approximately 30 registered companies per head of population, which is likely the highest ratio of any country in the world. Annual company registration fees provide a significant part of Government revenue in the British Virgin Islands, which accounts for the comparative lack of other taxation. This might explain why company law forms a much more prominent part of the law of the British Virgin Islands when compared to countries of similar size.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Virgin Islands bankruptcy law</span>

British Virgin Islands bankruptcy law is principally codified in the Insolvency Act, 2003, and to a lesser degree in the Insolvency Rules, 2005. Most of the emphasis of bankruptcy law in the British Virgin Islands relates to corporate insolvency rather than personal bankruptcy. As an offshore financial centre, the British Virgin Islands has many times more resident companies than citizens, and accordingly the courts spend more time dealing with corporate insolvency and reorganisation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cayman Islands company law</span> National economic law

Cayman Islands company law is primarily codified in the Companies Law and the Limited Liability Companies Law, 2016, and to a lesser extent in the Securities and Investment Business Law. The Cayman Islands is a leading offshore financial centre, and financial services form a significant part of the economy of the Cayman Islands. Accordingly company law forms a much more prominent part of the law of the Cayman Islands than might otherwise be expected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cayman Islands bankruptcy law</span>

Cayman Islands bankruptcy law is principally codified in five statutes and statutory instruments:

Australian insolvency law regulates the position of companies which are in financial distress and are unable to pay or provide for all of their debts or other obligations, and matters ancillary to and arising from financial distress. The law in this area is principally governed by the Corporations Act 2001. Under Australian law, the term insolvency is usually used with reference to companies, and bankruptcy is used in relation to individuals. Insolvency law in Australia tries to seek an equitable balance between the competing interests of debtors, creditors and the wider community when debtors are unable to meet their financial obligations. The aim of the legislative provisions is to provide:

Provisional liquidation is a process which exists as part of the corporate insolvency laws of a number of common law jurisdictions whereby after the lodging of a petition for the winding-up of a company by the court, but before the court hears and determines the petition, the court may appoint a liquidator on a "provisional" basis. Unlike a conventional liquidator, a provisional liquidator does not assess claims against the company or try to distribute the company's assets to creditors, as the power to realise the assets comes after the court orders a liquidation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong insolvency law</span> Financial regulation in Hong Kong

Hong Kong insolvency law regulates the position of companies which are in financial distress and are unable to pay or provide for all of their debts or other obligations, and matters ancillary to and arising from financial distress. The law in this area is now primarily governed by the Companies Ordinance and the Companies Rules. Prior to 2012 Cap 32 was called the Companies Ordinance, but when the Companies Ordinance came into force in 2014, most of the provisions of Cap 32 were repealed except for the provisions relating to insolvency, which were retained and the statute was renamed to reflect its new principal focus.

<i>Timberworld Ltd v Levin</i>

Timberworld Ltd v Levin was a landmark legal decision concerning whether the peak indebtedness rule operated in New Zealand. The peak indebtedness rule concerns how much a liquidator can claw back of the value paid to a creditor of a company, as part continuing business relationship, prior to the debtor companies liquidation. The Court of Appeal judgment rejected the liquidators contention that the rule should be adopted in New Zealand law.

<i>Re MC Bacon Ltd</i> (No 2)

Re MC Bacon Ltd [1991] Ch 127 is a UK insolvency law case relating specifically to the recovery the legal costs of the liquidator in relation to an application to set aside a floating charge as an unfair preference.

Metal Manufacturers Pty Ltd v Gavin Morton as Liquidator of MJ Woodman Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd & Anor is a decision of the High Court of Australia.

References

  1. "High Court insolvency ruling to stop 'unfair' creditor claims". Australian Financial Review. 2023-02-12. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
  2. "High Court rejects 'peak indebtedness rule' in unfair preferences case". www.holdingredlich.com. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
  3. 1 2 "Certainty: the peak indebtedness rule is no longer - Insight - MinterEllison". www.minterellison.com. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
  4. "Past its peak: the High Court of Australia confirms the abolition of the peak indebtedness rule for unfair preferences". APAC Restructuring, Turnaround and Insolvency Notes. 2023-03-07. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
  5. Hendriks, Anna (2021-07-15). "The Abolishment of the Peak Indebtedness Rule". JHK Legal Commercial Lawyers. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
  6. "Chapter closed! High Court confirms the peak indebtedness rule and statutory set-off are no longer applicable to unfair preference claims | Turks". turkslegal.com.au. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
  7. "Peak uncertainty – wait and see the ultimate effect - From Red to Black 2021 - Clayton Utz". www.claytonutz.com. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
  8. "Bryant & Ors v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd" (PDF).