| Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S | |
|---|---|
| Decided April 17, 2012 | |
| Full case name | Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S |
| Citations | 566 U.S. 399 ( more ) |
| Holding | |
| A generic manufacturer may employ the counterclaim provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act to force correction of a use code that inaccurately describes the brand's patent as covering a particular method of using a drug. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kagan, joined by unanimous |
| Concurrence | Sotomayor |
| Laws applied | |
| Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 | |
Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399(2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a generic manufacturer may employ the counterclaim provision of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 to force correction of a use code that inaccurately describes the brand's patent as covering a particular method of using a drug. [1] [2]
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .