It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it . The article may be deleted if this message remains in place for seven days, i.e., after 17:32, 28 August 2025 (UTC). Find sources: "Comparison of multi-model databases" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR |
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page . (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Comparison of multi-model databases (database management systems).
| Database | SQL | Document | Graph | Object | License | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ArangoDB | No | Yes | Yes | No | Business Source License 1.1 | Full ACID, pessimistic locking, configurable durability [1] |
| Azure Cosmos DB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Proprietary | Full ACID within a partition, multiple consistency models |
| CrateDB | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Apache 2 License | Eventual consistency, Optimistic concurrency control |
| EnterpriseDB | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Proprietary | Full ACID |
| Informix | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Proprietary | Full ACID, pessimistic locking, multiple consistency models, configurable durability |
| MarkLogic | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Proprietary | Full ACID |
| OrientDB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Apache 2 License | Full ACID, even distributed |
| SAP HANA | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Proprietary | Full ACID |
| Virtuoso | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Proprietary or GNU GPL v2 | Full ACID |