Fair Trading Tribunal of New South Wales

Last updated

The Fair Trading Tribunal of New South Wales was a tribunal that had jurisdiction to deal with consumer disputes in New South Wales. It was established on 1 March 1999 and it was abolished on 25 February 2002.

Contents

History

The tribunal was created to take over the functions of the Commercial Tribunal of New South Wales, the Consumer Claims Tribunal of New South Wales, the Building Disputes Tribunal of New South Wales, and the Motor Vehicle Repairs Disputes Committee of New South Wales. A review in 1997 was prompted by the New South Wales Government’s concern to ensure that all of those tribunals were operating both fairly and efficiently, and were providing a system of dispute resolution that was meeting those objectives [Second Reading speech Mr Whelan in the New South Wales Legislative Assembly on 20 October 1998].

The key reform to the former tribunals was to increase efficiency and effectiveness through a common membership structure of one tribunal, the elimination of duplicated registry services, and an improved capacity to co-ordinate proceedings and the potential to better utilise resources. In addition, it was hoped it would avoid overlap between jurisdictions and reduce artificial distinctions and confusion for the community where a number of tribunals had concurrent jurisdiction…

The volume, speciality and nature of disputes in the residential area were such that the maintenance of a separate Residential Tribunal of New South Wales was justified.

Jurisdiction

The tribunal was established under Fair Trading Tribunal Act 1998 (NSW). The actual jurisdiction of the tribunal was conferred by other legislation, for example, the Fair Trading Act 1987 or the Home Building Act.

The tribunal’s jurisdiction also included a number of stand-alone adjudicative functions, such as the jurisdiction of the Director-General of the Department of Fair Trading and the Motor Vehicle Repair Disputes Committee to deal with disputes between consumers and motor dealers; the jurisdiction conferred on the Director-General of the Department of Fair Trading by the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 1941 to review commissions and fees rendered by licensees; and consumer claims for compensation rejected by the travel compensation fund trustees which are currently reviewed by a specially convened committee appointed by the Minister.

Organisation

The Fair Trading Tribunal was organised into 4 divisions, namely a Commercial Division, a Home Building Division, a Motor Vehicles Division, and a Consumer Claims Division. As mentioned previously, residential matters were kept separately in the Residential Tribunal.

The tribunal was to conduct proceedings with as little formality and technicality and with as much expedition as the requirements of the case permitted. The tribunal was not be bound by the rules of evidence and it had the discretion to inform itself as it thought fit.

A party to a dispute had the carriage of his or her own case. However, the tribunal had the discretion to allow representation where it was appropriate. Factors such as the value of the matters, the complexity or capacity of parties to present their own case were considered when deciding whether representation should be allowed.

Appeals

Parties to a dispute could seek the leave of the tribunal for an internal rehearing. Specific grounds had to be satisfied to exercise this option. This was intended to prevent the tribunal from being inundated with unmeritorious applications for rehearings.

Appeals on questions of law continued to be available to the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

Abolition

The legislation for the tribunal required a review to be conducted two years after commencement. Following that review, it was recommended that the tribunal and the Residential Tribunal be merged. The New South Wales government decided to establish the new tribunal in 2000. The tribunal was replaced by the Consumer Tenancy and Trader Tribunal of New South Wales.

Caseload

According to its Annual Review, In the 2000-2001 financial year, the Fair Trading Tribunal received about 13,500 applications.

Related Research Articles

Small-claims courts have limited jurisdiction to hear civil cases between private litigants. Courts authorized to try small claims may also have other judicial functions, and go by different names in different jurisdictions. For example, it may be known as a county or magistrate's court. These courts can be found in Australia, Brazil, Canada, England and Wales, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, New Zealand, Philippines, Scotland, Singapore, South Africa and the United States.

Australian administrative law defines the extent of the powers and responsibilities held by administrative agencies of Australian governments. It is basically a common law system, with an increasing statutory overlay that has shifted its focus toward codified judicial review and to tribunals with extensive jurisdiction.

The Lands Tribunal was a tribunal in the United Kingdom created by the Lands Tribunal Act 1949 that had jurisdiction in England and Wales and Northern Ireland, although in the Northern Ireland context the term Lands Tribunal normally refers to a different body, the Lands Tribunal for Northern Ireland. The Lands Tribunal was unusual in having both first instance and appellate jurisdiction. The functions of the Lands Tribunal were transferred to the Upper Tribunal in June 2009 by the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2009.

Federal Circuit Court of Australia Australian court

The Federal Circuit Court of Australia, formerly known as the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia or the Federal Magistrates Service, is an Australian court with jurisdiction over matters broadly relating to family law and child support, administrative law, admiralty law, bankruptcy, copyright, human rights, industrial law, migration, privacy and trade practices.

The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) was formed by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 in the state of Victoria, Australia. As part of the Victorian Justice system the Tribunal sits 'below' the Magistrates Court in the court hierarchy. However the Tribunal itself is not a Court as it is a creature of statute and has no inherent jurisdiction or powers. VCAT was primarily a forum for litigants-in-person and the participation of lawyers or other legal representatives is not encouraged in some List areas, substantially reducing the cost of litigation. However some of the List areas will by necessity require parties to have some form of representation.

Land and Environment Court of New South Wales court in New South Wales, Australia

The Land and Environment Court of New South Wales is a court within the Australian court hierarchy established pursuant to the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) to hear environmental, development, building and planning disputes. The Court’s jurisdiction, confined to the state of New South Wales, Australia, includes merits review, judicial review, civil enforcement, criminal prosecution, criminal appeals and civil claims about planning, environmental, land, mining and other legislation.

Court of Disputed Returns (New South Wales)

The Court of Disputed Returns in New South Wales is a court within the Australian court hierarchy established initially pursuant to the Parliamentary Electorates and Elections Amendment Act, and since 2017 pursuant to the Electoral Act 2017. The jurisdiction of the Court is exercised by the Supreme Court of New South Wales and the Court considers petitions concerning the validity of any election or return under the Act. The Court is concerned with elections held for the New South Wales Parliament and local government elections within the state.

The Residential Tribunal of New South Wales was a tribunal which had jurisdiction to deal with tenancy disputes in New South Wales. It replaced the Residential Tenancies Tribunal of New South Wales on 1 March 1999.

Workers Compensation Commission of New South Wales

The Workers Compensation Commission of New South Wales is a tribunal in the Australian State of New South Wales. It has unlimited jurisdiction within the state in workers compensation matters.

The Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of New South Wales was a tribunal that specialises in resolving consumer disputes in New South Wales, a state of Australia. The tribunal has concurrent jurisdiction in respect of certain consumer claims with the normal civil courts of New South Wales. In other areas of consumer law, it has exclusive jurisdiction. It was created on 25 February 2002 and ceased to function on 31 December 2013, its function assumed by the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT).

Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) is a government agency that protects and promotes the interests of consumers and is based in the Australian state of Victoria. It is responsible for reviewing and advising the Victorian Government on consumer legislation and industry codes; advising and educating consumers, tenants, traders and landlords on their rights, responsibilities and changes to the law; registering and licensing businesses and occupations; conciliating disputes between consumers and traders, tenants and landlords; and enforcing and ensuring compliance with consumer laws. It is a business unit of the Department of Justice and Community Safety.

OMVIC regulates motor vehicle sales in Ontario. Administering and enforcing the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act on behalf of the Ontario Ministry of Government and Consumer Services (MGCS), OMVIC's mandate is to maintain a fair and informed marketplace by protecting the rights of consumers, enhancing industry professionalism and ensuring fair, honest and open competition for registered motor vehicle dealers.

Ombudsmen in Australia are independent agencies who assist when a dispute arises between individuals and industry bodies or government agencies. Government ombudsman services are free to the public, like many other ombudsman and dispute resolution services, and are a means of resolving disputes outside of the court systems. Australia has an ombudsman assigned for each state; as well as an ombudsman for the Commonwealth of Australia. As laws differ between states just one process, or policy, cannot be used across the Commonwealth. All government bodies are within the jurisdiction of the ombudsman.

Arbitration Act 1996 United Kingdom legislation

The Arbitration Act 1996 is an Act of Parliament which regulates arbitration proceedings within the jurisdiction of England and Wales and Northern Ireland.

Administrative law in Singapore Law of Singapores government agencies

Administrative law in Singapore is a branch of public law that is concerned with the control of governmental powers as exercised through its various administrative agencies. Administrative law requires administrators – ministers, civil servants and public authorities – to act fairly, reasonably and in accordance with the law. Singapore administrative law is largely based on English administrative law, which the nation inherited at independence in 1965.

Illegality in Singapore administrative law Singaporean judicial review doctrine

Illegality is one of the three broad headings of judicial review of administrative action in Singapore, the others being irrationality and procedural impropriety. To avoid acting illegally, an administrative body or public authority must correctly understand the law regulating its power to act and to make decisions, and give effect to it.

Exclusion of judicial review in Singapore law

Exclusion of judicial review has been attempted by the Parliament of Singapore to protect the exercise of executive power. Typically, this has been done though the insertion of finality or total ouster clauses into Acts of Parliament, or by wording powers conferred by Acts on decision-makers subjectively. Finality clauses are generally viewed restrictively by courts in the United Kingdom. The courts there have taken the view that such clauses are, subject to some exceptions, not effective in denying or restricting the extent to which the courts are able to exercise judicial review. In contrast, Singapore cases suggest that ouster clauses cannot prevent the High Court from exercising supervisory jurisdiction over the exercise of executive power where authorities have committed jurisdictional errors of law, but are effective against non-jurisdictional errors of law.

References